in a dictator, very rich, can you believe this? nobody could believe it. back in 2019, venezuela was overwhelmed by protests with the speaker of parliament. one guide though, declared himself entering presence of the country, is kind of to say it was supported by the president. trump, who claimed president my doors position was a legitimate, i've been, his wetlands were demanding freedom on the rule of law. but cus appeared to be more focused on the countries or results as than defending a legit democratic freedoms. us has been accused of seizing oil from countries where it has conducted that your operations a form, a rocky president said $150000000000.00 of oil money had been stolen from middle eastern country since the us invaded the 2 decades ago. soon, officials, claimants lost all aggressive to 80 percent of the countries. all production was being funded. daily. trump has opened the said multiple times. the us has been taking oil from syria, but we are leaving soldiers to secure the oil. now we may have to fight for the oil . that's okay,

but we keep in the oil. remember that i've always said that keep the oil. we want to keep the oil $45000000.00 a month. the, we're keeping the oil, we have the oil, the oil is secure. we left and troops behind only for the oil. we did leave. so just because what do you think the oil weight, security oil, other than that there's no reason for it in our opinion, and we've secured the oil and therefore a small number of us troops will remain in the area where they have the oil. multi j edits of the mind grabbing adults old news outlet says the us is now after it's next target. so this is the reality of us foreign policy. you know enough to look back to the eighty's, even the seventy's. and if you look at just about every single intervention america's done, you know where you mentioned syria, iraq, libya, most americans, presidents think that way, they may not be quite so, but it is. i'm clumsy. when talking about oil, i don't think we should,

we should make the mistake that is under the republicans. i think a little presents look at, look around the world and see where they can send troops and creates these security situations whereby they americans present themselves a saving the situation. and part of the deal is to cross go for the energy countries. you would just, there was a record report about and kind of num, uganda is now a real if you're present with mrs. a right now, you must be really worried that you are sitting on 12 trillion dollars worth of gold. and the americans are now starting to make the river in austin, very aggressive comments. the incorrect upper w relations are continuing to improve as united are under its president visited. he's took his accounts about anything that's strengthening types. we discussed ways to further strengthen economic cooperation and the strategic partnership between our 2 nations and ways to promote regional stability towards the prosperous future for all. so high level meet thing is the 1st in nearly

a decade. and it comes on the heels of richard bad ones. recently election of lead us expressed, hopeful, deepening ties in the future. and it's also an official style to the signing of a comprehensive economic partnership agreement between the 2 countries this year. it's also about the 50th anniversary of a different monthly relations between the 2 nations. a warming relations with saint on crowd number b, all yet a know the example of refreshments across the mid least. that was serious resubmitted through the r, a bleak saudi arabia under, on have also renewed size of the decades of facilities. international relations specialist measurements, rocky polo says that the trend may worries certain western players most probably the western countries, especially united states of america, is not happy. that original countries are not competing that corporate corporate. of course, they're not going to announce that the, the, the process is bothering him. but most strongly, they really, you know,

that they have some kind of finger that they can post, been in a, in a, in a field such as need be a, such as easy as a to, is made the, to the in that they can, you know, create the kind of new version of loss of power by so you're getting close by, you know, supporting some countries against other it could be in, in, in syria. it could be in libya, it could be in human, you know, it, it could be able to answer that. it says almost evidence that western countries are not totally controlling that agent. they are not the time mining and the policies of the regional power. similarly, by led to the relations in the me that this, or not defined or directed by the west or by the united states of america. so this is the new course affection in the region. a n t o t t and the united startup companies are likely to corporate more in the future.

also the notable investigation and to be attacked on the node stream pipeline has come in. so to on the declining influence on credibility of the us and mid rushes, ongoing minutes, you operation and you play the percentage of the, of, particularly of, of the african and central asian and south asian countries that have changed from being pro america to be pro russia is really quite the rhetoric that is more than much more than half the world's population, supports russia in the war and not, not the united states. this was never the way it was. we've lost so much credibility and in around the world, a small issues or thoughts has attracted so much debates. the media continues to come up with new versions of events with us outlets reporting that jim and investigators suspect poland was the operating base for the node stream sabotaged group. well, so i was denied delegation once again accusing bush,

all this other thoughts, but without providing any evidence of the contributes at metro mazda. as more so you may remember the story peddled in the western press of the random bunch of ukrainian duties supposedly rented the yacht loaded up with a bunch of explosives. sell that out to the middle of the sea. died down knowing exactly where the north street pipeline was planted. explosives on it, re surfaced white to safety and then supposedly watch the sunset as their handiwork took out. tons of concrete and steel all was absolutely 0 help from any nation state. now investigative journalist seymour hersh is quick to debunk all of these tales as soon as they drop, insisting that the us and norway actually ran the show and that they had jeremy's busing. well, the western press is circling back yet again with another round of details. this time citing german investigators who were pointing the finger at polling this time

stating, talked a logical data like satellite navigation details suggesting that the yacht took some d tours into polish waters. and alleging that this terrorism pleasure cruise was arranged by a travel agency in warsaw. the wall street journal is also reporting that this wasn't exactly your grandmas travel agency unless you're granny's annual pleasure cruises with the girls from the bridge club, or also organized by a tour operator. it's part of a network of ukrainian companies with links to ukranian intelligence. as the media is reporting that this and drama the ship was so now poland has suddenly been shot to center stage and this latest episode of the north stream mystery. and they're not too happy about having this spotlight on them with everyone. suddenly giving them some side, i so instead of offering some explanation or some insight to refute this new, the information and these details based on the box while they just pointed that

russia without any particular reason or evidence, holland is walking in some well worn foot steps though with the new jerk, russia blaming, russia is most likely behind as i'm 99 percent certain of and i think it's pretty clear someone did this and the only people in that region who are both the motive and the capability to have done it are russian or russian forces who sabotaged ignored stream to pipeline. the russians. remember, after seymour hersh has revelations pointed to american government involvement in the north stream sabotage. suddenly the blame narrative shifted to the government of ukraine. basically, ukraine in every way imaginable has been used as washington, battering ram against russia, a good investment as hillary clinton and senator lindsey graham has said it takes the dense so washington doesn't have to. and when it's job of doing that is done,

it's tossed on the pile with all of the other ones, useful reading change tools of washington's speaking, of which the belgian price is not reporting that the c, i a is trying to drag belgium into its efforts to toss you create onto the bus. that's how you learn from well informed sources that are military intelligence service. then receive a visit from the american intelligence agency, c i a t shirts, information about the possible involvement of your crane. b, c. i a was not allowed to say from whom the americans had obtained information about this. it illustrates how western intelligent services, including the belgian ones, have been aware for months that ukraine itself is probably involved in one of the most brutal and ventures the tax on the european energy infrastructure. a hey, whatever happened to washington sticking with ukraine for quote, as long as it takes us president joe biden said earlier this year, just 4 months later, now the us exactly like the honeymoon is over going around bad. nothing. he has on

the down low to a, to european findings, basically say, how to read the print exacting desperate. well, hey, you picked it out. maybe you're part of the problem, or maybe you're a big part of the reason why you cray is so crazy. leasing us at terms of getting dissenting opinions have intensified in the west, the only acceptable public narrative on the one you create remaining on to russian . the mainstream media reports are based on the size to fits acceptable public discourse is that these mind that we saw explains. the new zealand national radio broadcasts are r, n z is currently bank in on emission to investigate how certain stories about the quaint conflict were allegedly manipulated to align with the pro russian viewpoint . the story has been corrected. reading and usually what is concerned and takes these matter extremely seriously. we are investigating and have taking appropriate action. those concerns were raised after at least 15 articles published by the

broadcaster, seems to have been modified on the website. so even corporate language favoring most goes position. now here is one of the latest examples of these articles before and after the edits. the original articles were driven by a much more western note, as well as the edited version is currently being investigated. as things like the word cool to describe the 2014 made in revolution, as well as references to russian concerns about ukrainian new and as the groups. the individual in question is being investigated and has been placed on leave while the broadcaster examines the matter and investigation is on our way to be alleged conduct of one employee. the employee has been placed on leave while we look into these matters. we have corrected the stories and added an explanatory note to each article. we are getting other articles to check whether there are further problems

that hunt for pro russian narratives in the west is nothing new, but he has which it's big at the moment, as all you need now is to vocalize opposing views around the ukraine. conflict is senior a you official has or is your member space to spend more money to address what they perceive as russian propaganda. in many countries, the narrative, the trashes, not the grocer, but the victim is on the rice. we underestimate the influence of russian propaganda . indeed, preventing people from considering alternative perspectives is incurred is, let's also not forget the entire etc of the you, as well as canada, hasn't bend artsy in hopes of silence in most of those words. that's been followed by social media. restricted access to our t is content and microsoft and apple, removing it from the app store is binding. our t or older russian media oppose in your narrative is completely democratic. it

appears acceptable to adopt in narrow and biased view. this is. 8 the notion of balance, we were able to impose the restrictive measures on the kremlin propaganda machinery and effectively banned from updating without or so. sorry we said you to be, i knew the brand name for more, but i think it was individual on doing that. we. i know that back in the freedom of expression that just take the freedom of expression and when it comes to pro ukrainian narrative, well, that's more, that's fine. there's no such word as propaganda for western media coverage. but we must also mention a landmark report published by researchers as fairly, as university of adelaide, exposing quite a bit amount of ukrainian vol accounts on twitter, pushing their agenda. and of course, it was through media has remained completely silent about the findings of that

paper. as they refuse to show ukraine a negative light. so apparently freedom of speech is only acceptable when others we, we do your version of events, a system on there to oppose it. the accuse of spreading propaganda. it really begs the question of why we have them of expression and the democratic principles they proclaim abruptly lose their meaning in the face of opposing belief. ukrainian media outlets has been using voltage of russian emergency services, trying to pass it off as a new relief efforts in the footed areas of the coast on region. a video was initially shown on the channel, appraising efforts of the countries emergency workers to help save civilian lives. below the voltage featured workers in russian uniforms and using boats with the russian emergencies in minute administered insignia, the tunnels management. so as opposed to they said they would find all those responsible for the mishap with the video. now the movie from all of the channels

accounts offer and. busy of correspondence on this, roper says west of the new printing media outlets have been repeatedly called out, misleading their audience. we have to keep in mind that a new credit, any assault club, pro russian announcement, even if it's already a criminal case. so of course, uh, from their point of view they have to find the people i'm, i'm quite surprised that the don't charge them even with some something hard about what's interesting is that with german media set a rush, it didn't help at all. and so on. and what be interesting though, which is western media, if for example, german and english or whatever, what take this incident to show them what at 1st it disapproves that direction to help the people who work themselves this customer. so it's a nice uh thing against the rest of propaganda, which said rush, i didn't anything very interesting sign on of how primitive do you suggest you create and also west and propaganda as they showed themselves so that they, they allowing and if it comes out what they are firing the people who did the

mistake so well, some of you have to take with you if it would be so serious. and finally, russia has the modernized, it's always made machine gun, which is now capable of penetrating on the vehicles with long range. rapid fire sees eager to cut a shanker report from one of russia's most famous machine gun factories. lucas looked at this factory behind me, was named in honor of an engineer who turns a small wester russian town of cover off into a machine gun manufacturing capital. it is here that large caliber weapons of exceptional quality and power have been produced for decades. the factories, flagship product, is a chord machine gun, one of the most powerful in century guns in the world. this assembled by hands, which guarantees quality this machine gun with the caliber of 12.7 millimeters, is capable of damaging, lightly armored combat vehicles at a distance of up to 2 kilometers. targeted soldiers within that range have almost

no chance, even with the most modern body armor. this is a time machine gun capable of firing up to $600.00 rounds per minutes. and in addition to its incredible destructive power, it is also a precision weapons. in northern europe, machine gun up such a caliber for example. but what's your score? browning? machine guns, recalls, hardwood firing sources. there is no need to talk about precise shooting. they are no, but the court machine gun has been used. recoiled due to its muscle break because of the shooting accuracy is increased, and the impact on the sugar and the recoil damping system is the administrative assistant system. will that send you the call? the chart is a large caliber, defensive weapons that allows you to effectively defend your positions of the combat zone. this is the only machine gun of this caliber in the world that can fire on a bi part of the quote to me. and here's the chord machine gun has several modifications . if we talk about the advantages of them difficult ition for the infantry,

this machine gun can be placed both on the installation and on the rec without any tools. that is 1000000 carriers. the machine gun is widely used in this version. as i told you, it does not take much time to remove the machine gun, put it on the bipolar and fired from an unprepared but session. these uh its main advantages. this is the only 12.7 kind of the machine gun in the world that flies from a bipolar look. let me tell you. so you had another unusual machine gun produced at this factory. it is called the pitch in. nic, thanks to it's well designed. cooling system, there was no need to change the barrel after a certain number of shots, which is still characteristic of many other machine guns around the world. soon after the start of the russian military operations, soldiers who have been using these arms and combat zones have noted the exceptional quality of these weapons manufactured f as plants. well,

that's are up for now. be sure to check out all websites, all the com photos, the latest breaking news and updates. and in the meantime, we'll see you back here at the top of the architects wants the show. they just don't have to shape house because the application and engagement trails when so many find themselves will support, we choose to look for common ground, the the

the hello and welcome to cross software. all things are considered computer level. there are rules, then there are rules. this is how some nato countries approach you, greens, membership in the alliance will be us by know, troy alliance attempt to invite kids into the club to some kind of back door at the upcoming summit in building this the discuss this issue and more and joined by my guest martin j in marrow cash. he's an award winning journalist and commentator in budapest we cross to george sidney. while we use a pod cast, read the guy goal, which can be found on youtube and the locals. are a gentleman,

cross type rules in effect, that means you can jump any time you want, and i would appreciate it. i will start out with george in budapest. we have the upcoming a nato summit in, in bill us, and there's a flurry of rewards about, you know, what to do for ukraine because in 2018 there was a promise that one day will happen. well, that seems like a distant memory, considering what's happened, particularly over the last 16 months. and we have to always be cautious as a well need to buy it. so rules does not allow members to join if they have territorial disputes. well, i think you ukraine is in kind of that category right now, george. but it's something you and i've talked about for a very long time, is that the rules don't mean much to this alliance will break their own rules if it sits their own purposes. george yeah, so they might be the, they will break their own rules. the problem that they have is, are, they are poised by the room. but top, i mean, simmons is saying to them they don't need no stinking nato membership, you know,

and 5 is fine by which time ukraine will have been completely defeated by russia. i need major membership. now i need nato to be fighting on my side now. and doesn't quite know what to do with this arguments. so they're coming up with all of these so convoluted ideas where maybe we can go through have some bilateral agreements. so maybe from so poland can guarantee ukraine. but what's the advantage of bronze to guarantee you know, security, but ukraine, that means fonts will be just on the hook to fight on behalf of the ukraine. well, george, what should we do? have the precedence, you know, the, the, the u. k. and friends made security data entry is the poll. when did the 9? i don't want it. i don't need help, but the polls and now we have, i'm on this for the rest moose in the form and nato secretary general will now says as a advisor to the ukraine government, he says, well,

maybe we can create something called the coalition of the willing so colon, and the bolt explains, you know, they go in and fight on the ukraine's behalf. and of course, what happens then is that if, in the sense that fighting 8 in ukraine, russia targets, poland, unable to explain to them, they will scream, article 5, optical 5 were under its, are made the one for old. i know for one, nathan must enter the war. well, universe, most of the things that we're old buddies stupid because we don't realize what, what he's proposing. so essentially, they think that they can sneak ukraine through the back door, but there isn't the formal invitation. but in effect, major was still managed to get into this war on your grades, but i thought, well, we have to all remember recipes of the former head of nato. you have to propose something to get that fat paycheck that he's getting from the ukraine, which the americans are subsidizing. ok. martin the, the, they're trying to square

a circle right here. again, you know, they have their rules. but, you know, there was some kind of expeditionary force from poland. well, that's an nato country, but as far as russia is concerned, i mean, and there's one thing that i think is very important that is almost never ever mentioned in the discourse, is that, you know, we always hear about article 5, but there is an article one of the treaty and basically, and i'm just going to use common parlance here, don't start being ours. okay. and this is essentially, it's some are proposing again to break their own rules, which, you know, i wouldn't be surprised when they do because they do it all the time. are. yeah, but what is the price for breaking those rules? i mean, you have something now, which is i would say completely unprecedented on a much very much a tony point now in ukraine. more we, what we're seeing now is a group of countries in eastern europe combat recent and regressed goal. bang that fist on the table to say we need that to membership, you claim,

let's not talk about it in months, or whenever less actually talk about it as a reality. that could happen right now because they see the any way for the, for any development, positive on the west side for any progress they see the subject, but to boost subjects. best talked about. so this was another, talked about the to be subject all ukraine shortage of soldiers. and this is really in my view, what's central to this whole and they to debate, you know, so let's keep things on and on about minutes, equipment. they wouldn't never touch the subject of the numbers of soldiers that the needs. now, you know, we're side of us. colonels, i've been interviewed on the internet a new, a very well informed because of getting the information on the ground rules and from the pentagon bass saying that savanski hasn't lost undersized soldiers. that thing is lost. plus the 250000 men talking about press gains, rounding up men over the age of 48 years old, who go to 3 out lifestyle on the, on the bus on the front. so the real issue is mand sold is on the ground. we still

reports recently in the u. k. of 50 s s o, which is already operating in you find this quite a high number of special forces to operate behind enemy lines. and i see what we're seeing inmates of now is a double bout admission from nate. so and from this group of more gun, her members, one what nature was done, what was the police done in the last 15 months? is nowhere near enough. they really haven't received anything and they've underestimated every single 100 and underestimate about of money, the number of bits of them up the amount of kids. and they've underestimated the result of russians there and, and to the 2nd point really is the, um, let me talk about military kit and searches, you know, the estimation i think is so under estimated to be, could be looking at now. i'm tripling or quadrupling the actual ministry support. so these countries are saying they're talking about the possibility of going into

ukraine, some of the soldiers into crime. but along with the nature, mondays with them, with a month, i simply from their own governments. and the russians will just simply accept, obviously, but that this is not nature is no the west by to just jump. right. these are not nato troops up to this is just the business which really absurd. because george, i mean, this is the kind of big beside is that number one, with some, miraculously you, with the nato, except, you know, you propane into the alliance, the rule that would determine the russians know why, what is called, in what way. and then this kind of this, you know, wave the magic wand and say the 12 components are part of nature, but these troops are not part of new to, but they're both listed. so, i mean, this is kind of the, this is a circle jerk here, george the best. right? and, and the thing is that they are also convinced that russia is afraid of made so. so i think we'll look at, let's see, is sneak in poland,

and the voltage states and whoever wants to joining this coalition of link and russell say hey, we don't want to hit bolen because if we go on bones going to scream all the go. 5, then more of will with nato, and we are afraid of nato, because nato is much bigger, much stronger than we are. and, you know, went already to go. nuclear and nato, however is ready to go on euclid. so that is, that's the argument that we can essentially bring in additional uh, manpower and rusher will simply not there. to hit this ramp, i would just simply slink away in defeat. that's the argument. but of course, you know, why should russia except this, i mean, the, you know, once, once you're in and you're fighting the other deal grades be hop in ukraine, russia will hit you and will extend the war. i mean, you live, it was a fed target. well, publish and basis, bullish, logistics, and the supply lines. everything will be if the game and, you know,

then it will be up to later what the are usually better to escalate. been using their argument is that, you know, this is a bi lateral, this is a by law so much it can say, well we're going to buy laterally bomb q. and they the argument tables in on itself, martin jump it because they're making a huge assumption which is the boots and went through that. and the reason why is because the track record on page and side has been very much about the escalation. he's never risen to the base. he's always back down because he knows was implications of the terrific dream discuss. i mean, it's a we possibly, i mean is it? i can hardly believe what i'm saying. oh, we actually possibly looking at the early stages of a nuclear war. i mean, this is where this will heading. you know, when you, when you start talking about, could we even imagine the 3 of us a few months ago talking about troops on the ground in ukraine. you know, when i was talking about british and american soldiers and it had been inevitably arriving the was read talking about low numbers and probably cover. so this is

being that i think is, makes a lot of sense. and we did have totally flows, is what is waiting and sources, and you can bet your bottom dollar. the british us estimates what would rocket would go, right. so because a british of probably being the most gun hope of old western nations, even more than america in terms of what we're actually doing on the ground and lead to so you know, we, we are getting into a very, very dangerous situation of escalation where we assume the person will not escalate if we escalate, but i don't think we can, we can, we can bank on that. i think now the, now it's, if it's turning now to, you know, there are many american mainstream journalists now who are actually being and submit that the russia is stuck now to is no longer relevant if it ever was, you know, and that ukraine is taking huge losses on the battlefield and if we all gonna make any difference in ukraine, you know, we, we need to do something much, much, much bigger on a much bigger scale. and i think that's really what they told me. this is is

negotiating and working out now with it's with it some whole.