years at this move by, so i'm going to sort of the country know being more d to include the african union in the g. 20 block is one you just select to bring the see 20 policy. remember, india has reached out to more than $120.00 countries that the global south the confuse up the funding. we saw several issues, issues in the a wants to highlight on the g 20 that form issues that are leaving and the developing in the developed world. for example, the world prices, the fuel prices, and now she prices, india wants to bring all. what do you this on the platform lead to unzip that low in the a will be hosting the more lead to us in new delhi or so this proposal is by the time industry of the country a really a step forward in eclipse. it will and includes the global pro. oh yeah, my colleague and by that time i me, i spoke with the parent guests and they said that including african states and the

g. 20 is not any fair. it's also in line with today's new global reality of multi polarity, the the, the, the union gum seemed a deep voice to benefit. you couldn't be expedited because then what would happen. one of the was going to be on the portal won't be slightly because of the law i just for be on. no i just pretty much literally just next to the united nations. and do you have to do that? you should, if we see them via you go the shuttle the coolest of what we're doing, a little more. what do you need to order? but these are changing city that for levi not be in very specific sense. only sense . and that's kind of what you mean. the other piece from africa like guns, they have to use the gun

informed everything from the sure. beautiful. what in fear to put in with a gene. so when they expire. so any expansion of the g to at least based on member of consensus, how likely is this? is this proposal to succeed? and what would the ramos a ramifications be if they were any? and he says, one of the major change is kind of dependent. mckee seemed to be held india, so these little suite a for india, we've also here with child about in the last year end of the page and they also been successful obviously for us to just say it is not difficult for what kind of is like being the kind of a child that i shared because there always is it in but if you look at the with the, the a always use it with this kind of horse and like that miss, you should be in the house. so it's going to be

a bit difficult for them as soon as we get the call. but i the least that is we say that the world is changing. we will have a lot of categories as i applied for the mileage you made it push with inclusion actually got. so i feel like it's going to succeed because there's a lot of good with the possible kind of this is going to succeed in the width as much as they may not make it. i don't think they have a choice yet. they have to pay for the votes of being counted in the west african nation of molly to decide whether the country will adopt a new constitution. it's all ahead of next year's presidential election. molly has undergoing a couple of coolers in the past 3 years and the support is of video constitution say it'll pay the way for a transition to severely a new rule. political and rest though, has faith, the country, and been ongoing jihad, as insurgency in the rural north. and critics say,

the french military forces deployed there have been very little to proud of violence. even in some of the addressing david exacerbated, i mean the, the officials, they're a model even expelled the french. i'm basset last year. let's uh, get a few more details. now with this local rippled malia and across the country come out in the large and most of the world is a recruiter put on the, on a new constitution, defend the tools that has been, they've gone through this of what i need to remove you from a west on the domain, so they both the a to point to for a millions of citizen where it is able to participate in the vote. the from the social conflict make has a little because the is the vote, the end of a suck career. how to avoid things some through in the capital a but my co many and the board is included with a you, in a believe through from them is an important that this the form of the use of process on the government. as well as the looks toward the future of this mission here. how if it, with reaction from a voters of the, you see,

the on the constitution is the fundamental act of the republic and determines, or are the laws we all have to be able to say yes or no to this constitution. it allows you to be through member of the country to be a citizen. for me, this vote is essential if we don't vote on the fundamental law. what are we going to vote on? i'm voting for my own safety. i advise people to come and vote. this is special because we are going through difficult times and people need to vote to change that . i was discussing visibility with our regional ex, but still i mean like i don't know who believes that the referendum at the end of the day will be passed to successfully since that $9.00 to $60.00 the independence of monday. that's all the time we have put in something from files, but now we are in creating something new. if we set up a disability for them based on that beautiful nation, which would be, it would be the for flip a little bit of cost,

but also the new stuff in terms of the contents of our both of these on in several times. that's why there is a big kind of uncles of how the new position, but that's up to, to the, to the gym at the left of where most of the adjustable to do for the 4th. but the results we have having no show clearly that's it. the yes is leaking and the monday we have a new post. this on the badging has lost out at washington saying that by increasing its military presence all around china is borders. the us is instigating a potential conflict to define expected military conflict where to arise between china and the us. it would not be caused by china taking provocative moves of sending military vessels and jets to a la or anywhere off the coast of california. rather,

it would be triggered by us worship, or plains close to china's territory in dealing with the country. the size of china mutual respect is the ground role. so this comes out of the us secretary of state, anthony blink. and all of a sudden he's in beijing for tools is trying to cool be increasing. we hate the tensions between both china around america is the highest level of visit by us officials in and roughly 5 years. as we understand beijing is reportedly being refusing phone calls from washington for months. we spoke on a with political analyst, alex reported by who says that military maneuvers by washington in a china region ultimately make redundant. lincoln's the diplomatic gestures in beijing. it's in a blink of an eye if that's how much attention china is going to be put on it. i did not see any red carpet being rolled out for anthony in his i guess a humiliation tour as i call it. i mean, where is joe biden?

in this, i mean, shouldn't he be visiting a china to try to work this out? we put a, a, a, you know, diplomatic person in charge here and the blinking. and he's scared of, uh, an air balloon a few months ago. so i don't see much is going to come from this at all. it would be like having a war ships off uh, you know, the west coast of california. uh, that would never happen. uh from, you know, chinese military for its navy would not to put its destroyers just off the shores of, you know, los angeles. it would be an absolute ludicrous move. but yet, here we see the americans being very provocative. tra, trying to see how close and how productive they can get to china. and i don't know, we could see a mistake potentially happened in the future. the saudi arabia's top different about, has conducted the countries highest level of visit to iran is the countries meant that long afraid ties though with the help of china. here's our corresponding with

more details. the one that i want to emphasize that the regions security and the security of any state in the region is a substantial and michael subject and the indisputable necessity for achieving a more secure, dynamic, and develop future and outcome and region. it's another big step to work for restoration of tires between your one, installing the array of the solid you for administer face plugin for part isn't 10 rod marking the 1st ever visit by top saudi officials to as long as 20161 to 2 countries separate ties before han was we're really welcome to buy his iranian counterpart, we'll say, and i'd be the young during a joint press conference that we diplomats heading out the we establishment of a diplomatic relations, which they said worst contribute to a fostering piece of security across the region bid for our house at his conveying the warm greetings of getting some morning crown friends mohammed decided on to the warning president, he said the king dam is looking forward to seeing president re see in we all of us

soon as possible. this only different i said, mutual respect, non interference, and the 2 countries internal affairs and commitment to the united nations charter will be prioritized in bilateral relations. he said that the 2 countries had discussed ways to ensure maritime security and reduced promo, operation of weapons of mass destruction. well, what's if you had the, we should point out the importance of cooperation that we know 2 countries where they go to regional secuity. the importance of somebody to i'm navigation and waterways and the same cooperation between old countries in the region doing show that they are free of weapons of mass destruction. the one in foreign minister for his part said jeff, one has never equated security with militarism and consider security to be a comprehensive concept which includes protocol, economic, cultural trade and social dimensions between all of the countries in the region. i

mean, i've been down here and added that he discussed a wide range of issues with his counterpart, which included trade ties and joints investment. in addition to accommodating solid, the tourist and total groups. how many be interested in visiting your want? i mean, i have the value and bid for our hon. have already met twice they 1st met in beijing to follow up on the china broker and reconciliation agreement. i've been, they met in early june in south africa on the side lines of the brick summits. where best are hon told. i mean, i have the money on that she would soon visit in mont and march the 2 sides agreed to reopen their embassies. within 2 months, the run reopened its embassy in re all on june 6, followed by its costs of the general engender and its mission to the organization of islamic cooperation. a day later, the reproach mind between the former adversaries has played positively into the regional affairs. it um and is decreasing, of course tensions across the region, including in the m. s, syria or iran,

entertain them head back opposing sides and the conflicts a team of scientists has created the world's 1st synthetic human embryos from stem cells. it's a breakthrough that ultimately sidestepped the natural methods of reproduction. now these are embryo like structures or at the earliest stages of development. they don't even have a heart or a brain, but include the right cells that would go on to form the present or even the embryo itself. so i to say the one day synthetic embryos will help to advance the understanding of various genetic diseases. however, the innovation does res, major ethical and legal issues. as we heard earlier when my colleague rachel blevins, discuss the topic with a panel of guest, a side now where it's a very nice in stage of development of this technology. the major break to it has a created is not in a substitute the human embryo. it is basically about dissolving many mysteries of

implantation. so the way the system condition of defeated miscarriages, which so many women was either facing. jen be probably onset by this, but definitely as any i must be such fools. we have to have very, very strict legal and ethical guidelines. the country is where the researches would be, you know, taking straight forward. and similarly that can also be in the edison. i really just kind of subs. so that is why yes, we are in a very, very news and stage of, of, of research. but there is a lot of support. so many people. i mean, this is such a new breakthrough that at present there is no regulation. so is that a mass of concern? and do you think the rules will be quickly made and brought into play fairly well, you're coming into the square science as a new club. um, regulation. so what do we do going forward?

yeah, because issues that have been raised, the issues that have been raised, legal issues, what happens to these individuals? what piece that by the way, so that the congress, what type is to the tissues? how do you describe them? i guess i believe i lot of issues that was we hope that's uh, regulations we be at the forefront rather than waiting for science to be anything less than then before concerns have been raised, the synthetic embryo still have some of the features of a natural embryo. and that's why it's unethical to carry out experiments on them. what do you think about that? and it's, it's, it's a lot of mistry, it does bring a lot of club my and a lot of confusion, especially when it comes to how then if we say that this a human embryos to be then destroyed. then once we're done doing our experiments,

because if that was someone, somebody is child, then of course that would bring a lot of uh you know, a pricing. so there is no specific answer to that. i guess it would depend on that . and also a lot of issues like what was the purpose of that a creation of the embryo and who is responsible for that embryo and you know, how, what are the guidelines when it comes to embryo destruction, so far we do not have any. i believe that needs to be a bigger discussion on how those embryos will be handled. i've a human i, they send me human and what drives the recall and fly to them and who makes those decisions in the head of the u. n. agency for supporting palestinian refugees is grateful for austria's support as the organization and struggles to remain financially sullivan. despite assistance from multiple countries. um, at least correspondent big steam, almost 6000000,

registered palestinian refugees rely on the united nations relief and works agency . those who lost the homes of to 1948 or shortly after the stablish ment or the state of israel. the agency has been operating for 75 years in camps across the occupied west bank in lebanon, jordan and syria, food healthcare education. the agency has contributed to the welfare in human development of 4 generations of palestinians. beneficiaries say the u. n. r w a is literally irreplaceable. to stay close down, where am i supposed to go? where will i get my medication? as a woman and the refugee with 3 kids that study in school, i feel fear, i fear for their grades. i fear what is going to happen tomorrow for their future. i'm afraid even when i sleep in homes and base fears have grounds. the un relief agency is on the verge of financial collapse. the deficit is close to $200000000.00

with just 24 percent of the $1600000000.00. the agency size is needed for 2023 funded so far. if the money doesn't coming, half a 1000000 boys and girls will not go to school. almost 60 percent of all funds go to educational purposes. thousands will not get live support and medications, and almost 2000000 will be left without live saving humanitarian assistance. the residence of palestinian refugee camp say they go to u n. r w a full life threatening emergencies, as well as daily routine assistance like bank transfers. but the role of the agency goes far beyond saving or improving lives. it means hope we are people who are waiting for the right to a down home. unfortunately, if we don't say anything about the u. n. r w a leaving us, it would mean we agree that we don't have any rights. let's be transparent. the u. n. r w a n u n, are the only witness to the suffering of the boosting and refugees,

there is no replacement for the u. n. r w a. not even that the listing and administration is even the be. i don't have the money for call listing and refugees. we are towing the u. n. r w a that they are the only ones that can sustain us and know our misery. you are the ones witnessing our expulsion. so the you follow for the why there is a shortfall. most of the agencies funding comes from the united states in 2021. the u. s. was the largest contributor, followed by germany, making up about 46 percent of the total contributions the agency receives from governments. the u is traditionally the 3rd largest give or earlier in march, the u. n. r w, a representative in gaza. and i was that some countries will reduce their donation, stacy, or with others, and not increasing their aid as planned. he said, the world's focus on the credit in crisis was some of the reasons surprise of you know, this agency being collab, we'd be hire even called the donors. and, you know,

i've got to come to den, the amount that we asked for if we'd be at least catastrophe. that's what it will affect the social tab click inside all 15. you know the societies on politically and culturally good inventory. you know, it will take them for the long term. the agency house being warning over them, pending chrysler's for months on the ground. people decided appealed to the international community using their own voices as got a camp is among the most densely populated palestinian refugee camps in the occupied west bank every day in the last week. local residents gather here at the entrance by testing against the closure of the u. n. r w a. just like for millions of others, the u. n. release agency is their only hope for survival and feeling alive. they doubt that they voice will be heard across the seas and oceans, but they say, what other toys do they have? just as we finished filming well armed local police arrived in several cars. to ask

for testers to clear the road they blocked, demonstrators obeyed this mentoring the small barricade, enrolling not their banners, but tomorrow at the same time, they will return to continue the fight. where are you from ocean archie, from palestine in administration. the story continues online as to most of us tories just check out the website on t thought. com. of course i to you is also across the telegram gap on, on the so what we've got to do is identify the threats that we have. it's crazy, even foundation, let it be an arms race is on often very dramatic. the only personally i'm going to resist. i don't see how that strategy will be success very clear. i think it was time time to sit down and talk

the it's crazy to think that in certain parts of the world, obesity is becoming that. but demick on other parts of the world, there's not no food that children are malnourished or dying from starvation. i'm christy, and you're watching the cost of everything where today we're going to be looking at the cost of food waste. how much perfectly good food is trash and disposed of globally every year, anywhere between 30 to 40 percent of all food produced globally for human consumption is lost or wasted. some of that waste comes from spoiler strain,

transport and other times it's from not being sold at the supermarket or being forgotten at the back of a person's refrigerator. while there's food loss at nearly every stage of food production and distribution, it is shocking how much perfectly good food is simply wasted. the food loss index estimates and globally around 14 percent of all food produced is loss from post harvested up to but excluding the retail stage. meanwhile, 17 percent of global food production is wasted at the household retail and food service level. meanwhile, millions of people are suffering from food and security every day to so while the world weighs about 1400000000 tons of food every year, the us is the biggest culprit, the us this car is more food than any other country in the world. nearly $40000000.00 tons every year. that equates to about $219.00 pounds of waste per

person. now in the us, 37 percent of food ways happens at the household level, which means that american consumers are over buying food. spoilage is a real issue and one of the biggest reasons why people throw out food more than 80 percent of americans discard perfectly good consumable food. because they misunderstand expiration labels. compared to the rest of the world, the us is less costly and plentiful, making impulsive food purchases. america also has a take out culture where it doesn't used food in its entirety. and composting isn't a natural part of our food prep routine. if people started buying, handling, consuming and budgeting for meals differently, it could make a big difference. food waste also contributes to wasted water and energy. it took to produce and generating greenhouse gases like methane, and c, o. 2 and chloral floor a carbons from agriculture. and if not consumed food waste and trickles down stream

to become the largest category of material placed and municipal landfills. these rotten vegetables or expired food also released methane and nitrogen, which are problematic greenhouse gases. while a very small portion of this food waste is donated or recycled, the majority goes straight to the landfills where it's incinerated and flows down the drain or left to rot. so has food ways become a global economic issue? or is it a social problem to explain more well bringing neural goldstein, editor and publisher of bio cycle so nor out what our country is doing with all this food waste. can they be redistributed or up cycled or does it all just go to spoilage in different countries have had different opportunities and it's also somewhat culturally uh, we find that uh, in, in many cities, people go to the market or stop by the, you know,

just the neighborhood shop every day on their way home to get what they need for the meal. so there's, there's not a lot of excess versus people that will go to the store and shop for a week and buy a bunch of stuff and they end up eating out 3 or 4 of those nights a week. so i think culturally that, that goes, that's a factor in it. uh, the other thing that we're seeing is food that is produced, but maybe not sold in time. there's a growing support for food for donating that food network for making sure the food especially perishable food stays safe. and you know, so let's say d, e and then for example, they'll get funding for refrigerated trucks or refrigerators in places to, to keep it as a bowl sourcing that they have a certain amount of upside clean,

you know, taking, taking food and, and making it using it as a rod greeting for something else. and then traditionally, and this is going on for, for many, many, many years is a recycling to that is no longer eligible for animal feed. so it still says staying within the food system. all that says we still throw away a lot of food that should have been eaten or could have to d y s, so little food recycled or up cycled. does it cost more to recycle then just to toss it in many places. the answer sadly is yes it's, it's even starting at the farm where there's crap said, you know, they picked up the highest quality that they'll get the most money for. and then the 2nd grade. yeah, the lower grade produce ends up staying, you know,

in the field because they can't, they're not going to get enough money for it to harvest it. so there's ways straight at the farm level. and then, as you know, when they, when it comes to figuring out what to do with food that needs to be thrown away it's, it's really crazy for all the infrastructure that's been created for donation. it's still a very small percentage of food that still available, gets donated, and then you basically end up with, well, you know what, just thrown away. it's easier and very developed countries. that's our culture. we've been very much just toss it away. it has no value. and so when folks like myself, we're in the field of organic recycling and food waste. recycling. it does at least have a better n use if it goes to composting to make soil amendment to the old healthy soil's

or to be what we call in aerobically digested to produce a bio gas that can be used to produce electricity or, or fuels. uh so there's, it's, and then yes, in many places it is or what cheaper just to throw it away then to go through the process of product collecting and processing it. how can countries reduce food waste and what countries have been the most successful at that? it's interesting, i was thinking about this question and i would say that the biggest challenge to getting as a country to reduce food waste, it starts with education and really realizing how much food is being thrown away. and then developing strategies to and programs to both reduce the amount of, of food that's wasted, introduce smart or buying habits and cooking habits and,

and then also re purposing, you know, in other words, let's just say, well, we see in the catering business, the food service is not putting out all the food you've made, but keeping some of it back because if it's not, sir, then it has to be that it can be donated even if it's prepared. so it's really in kitchen practices at food service businesses to reduce and, but really at the end of the day, it's just building that awareness and somehow putting in price, you know, making the cost of throwing in a way higher, you know, are the penalties for throw it, you know that it encourages you because what we've seen is when stores where the city, your state passes a mandate, you have to separate your food ways for grocery stores. and they'll offer a,

a lower price. they realize when they start separating it, how much eligible food they're throwing away. so sometimes when you either push them to force them to recycle it in separate it, it very quickly becomes evident how much is being yup. how much money they're wasting. now, billions of dollars are lost in food waste. how can this figure be reduced or were cooked so that it can go back into the economy or the producers? i would say it really has to do with this awareness of, of the amount of food that gets wasted.