looked that a long drawn out process would give way, united states and nato every opportunity to get more and more and more involved. and so we now see the latest and all that is f sixteens that are equipped to carry nuclear weapons. so this greatly widens the war. i mean, the, the russian military has to look at these eps exchange, as possibly using pasco nukes against russian troop formations. or this is a very much a war whitening scenario. so the real question that those of us who have been watching this conflict have is why the kremlin refuses to use sufficient force to bring it to an end. because the longer continuing is the more. busy that wes gets involved in the more the war widens, and the latest reports are that the, the russian military is considering or of what to do after the,

when these f sixteens appear, or will they have to, will the russians have to attack the european basis to which these planes operate? well, this is a very much a war whitening scenario. and so to me, most of the questions ask about the war are relevant. the only relevant question is why does rusher permit it to continue? when russia has the ability to end it immediately, all they have to do is use sufficient force and bye back in that we face a ever why me more a by sufficient force do you mean conventional weapons, mr. obviously, i mean, yes. yes of the russians don't need to use nuclear weapons, so that is the notion that you try and fight a war with the roger is ridiculously the capability of doing that. the notion that

nato can fire the conventional wars rusher is, is ridiculous. and so, but that's where we're headed, because as the war whiteness, it becomes more dangerous. and so i don't understand, and none of my colleagues, we don't understand why rusher takes this risk, is not a limited conflict any longer. i mean, food can say it's a limited middle to operation, but it's not limited when we have have 6 teams coming in from nato countries where we have long range missiles coming in from england and the united states. this is not a limited operation. and so the pretense that is so limited operation is long exposed. and so is the russians need to bring this to a close before it gets out of hand. and that is the only question about this

product. uh huh. just just pay it to the devil's advocate. advocates had them. so maybe in the west, the media have been saying that discounts if, as it hasn't fully dealt on the way yet, that ukraine is conducting, probing a talk to us as a see from your reaction. your position on the pictures of us, and i guess my question is rather than escalating further, do you think that if it comes to offensive doesn't meet the expectations of ukraine's allies then they will be forced to maybe push ukraine to with sense of the negotiating table because a some sustainable it's keeps applying. it was such a ministry 8. well, i don't, i don't think so the judge. so the washington started to say, look, the american foreign policy, which is controlled by the neo conservatives, is stated very clearly the personal goal of american foreign policy is to prevent the rise of russia or any country that could serve as

a constraint on us unilateralism. so united states cares nothing about new train. it is a weapon to be used against russia. so they will continue to use that weapons as long as it's available. and that's why the russian should take sufficient action to close this conflict. dell, they have the power, they have the conventional power. you know, why did they want to know the agreement that the west is going to hold? you know, we, we had the missed agreement which food and held to for 8 years while the rock americans built up an army for your train. we had the other days of food presenting to the average of the leaders. a trade is that you try and hit saw in the war that caused the russian withdrawal from cubes. well, why did you keep the secret all these years? you know this something here is not right?

and in the conflict needs to be ended, when you have such a powerful military as rush or sitting there permitting account or offensive from ukraine. i mean, this is nonsense. what, why does russia premiere account or offensive? but there's, if pressure doesn't, what you're trying to have, it's out or offensive is simply to store it. so the whole thing is, draw it out and out. it makes no sense and it widens in why was in big drums more dangerous. indeed on just want to bring it back as well. so those, those f sixteens that apparently will be supplied at some point in the future, i believe is some of your trading partners. i've always thought to training on the 16th. i know many in the west, the media said that ukraine doesn't have their superiority, and that's why the accounts are offensive. how stumbled will these f 16 is be a game changer on the battlefield over there become 2 lights? and so a few of them to make a difference they will not be

a game changer on the battlefield, but the ones that are coming 1st according to the reports from the night tonight to countries. all right, episode exchange that had been modified to carry tactical, new blue weapons. now i kremlin war, bladder has to say, why are they sending those? if all they want to do is challenge air spirit, or are they intending to use these planes for tactical nuclear weapons? the kremlin cannot overlook this, it would be taking unacceptable risk. and so that fact about the blade is a war. why the fact the trembling has to say, hey, this could be used for tactical weapons against our troop formations. so they would have to take some action. i guess you want the department of these planes is not

a question of shooting them down in the air. it's the question of why are tactical gear jeweler prepared for a little bit airplanes being given to you? right. that is the question. it is a very wide thing for winding development and spend the day. and indeed indeed, i'm talking about next year. now say if there were a republican presidents, which come to paula, do you think that ukraine should be worried about this and the like, if off it's i to reduced opposite sides. so keep this talk, this the top of me that you aid of financing. go into the war. you know, if this, if this conflict continues into the next year, then it's shame on the traveler. why is it letting a conflict continue that it can in, in, in a moment? that's the question. why does the privilege of let this conflict continue?

if that is the only question of any importance, the kremlin has the power to stop disconsolate because there's no comparison between ukrainian force and russian force. they are in comparable rush. it can stop this conflict immediately just by applying force. instead, it's fighting the conflict with the militia and a private military organizers. she just makes no sense. so the danger to every one is a continuation of a conflict that is ever widening. the president needs to stop the widening of this conflict by bringing it into intermedia and it has the force to do that the conventional force. so that is the question,

and that is the danger, the law under this conflict, 10 years, the more the war. well, why we have seen the whitening of the war 3 we so we certainly have to and then we will have to continue to wait to see how it's in faults over the coming weeks and months up. okay, well i was a former assistant secretary of the us treasury unfold the wall street journal and it's a fun and nice in to talk to you today on on c. thanks very much for your time. yes . and then use a recent rate by is ready for says on the west bank city of jenny and resulted in the death of a 7 palestinians and 90 people being injured. but it's not just the postilion community who's in the foreign line covering the conflicts car's risk. for journalists as well the,

let's see the best we've had our full threshold fits the rest of us with the hell nice. when it was still uses all the people around me with june list that were full of us together. over in the press, old fits and the trash load us will clear this, not a just me talking to a weak points on this side of the best. so he must have been pretty sure that the target was a joyous. i can say that it was a shooting the target donors in particular to keep them white, no pressure to be brought cost in any video for to a. so, and for any policy, and you know, in that area, this case is evidence that there are no laws that would be followed by unoccupied states. i opened the door when to something kicked me in my heart, something like an electrical shock. i wasn't sure if it was a buddhist arista, something hit me directly to do was still open and i shouted to the emergency guys

that i was hit. they took me instantly and when i reached the hospital they started the procedure. first, the, the x ray me to discover that it's a positive sign, my hot breaking through the guts and around the lungs and ended up behind the pancreas. the video is the intimidation of journalists, and at the same time it disrespects people's lives. the israel, a journalist for the state that supports him, but the bill is tv and journalist doesn't have a state that supports and protects him. we don't have an international system that curious about palestine and there's no boosting, you know, 40 that has tools to defend itself. the, the, when you into this field you have a message to deliver. oh my feelings. talk about the palestinian cause. never

expects this, a random product could change. one is just the opponents has adulthood, a new national anthem, excluding previous lines, about pride and gratitude for new freedom that were addressed to funds. the concept renews the best. let's be grateful for our freedom and new limits. say the line was originally written by a frenchman in 1961. at the museum i gained independence for years that had been calls to change the anthem, arguing that the lyrics express gratitude through the former colonizer a similar situation, has a leveled analogy. area where the has been outraged at funds of the powers chimed into the debates about nisha is national anthem is julia as not returned its own answer to that of 1960 two's words mentioned friends as an imperial ruler, coffee kwaku, a senior lecturer at woods university in johan, his back south africa explains that move nigeria to make the change very,

very important gesture from the share. and in fact, one of the most important thing that needs to be happening across if you are in colonial french, which means the former apologies, which are still colonized anyway. it's a sort of exercise, this kind of culturally gemini stuff in there for centuries. and one other ways to go live trim is, is to start with the enzyme because the answer is the embodiment of the identity of the nation. and it's summer. and if it hasn't been really made, probably as much of the side a r t, you know, suddenly, and that's a sudden, but also brings about most uh you are in western media. are the talk about how julia is not meddling with the french and, and uh, he's asked the guy, the same president saying change of dances are the ones are doing what they say. you know, historically is representative to, you know, that kind of suffering the one to 2 friends more than

a 1000000 people died in the gillian war uh, with, with french. so this is a really, a whole brand is history. and this legacy must be addressed one way or another principal complained all the time. they're trying to throw the weights around or anything against their phone. i'm calling. is that something that for the most part, africans moines more will sort of be either silent. but i think with the time africans will be vocal about it and dismiss them outright, blatant misstatements of scientific information that swats us presidential envoy for climate junk carries. being accused off by going want start us off the he said the greenhouse gas emissions killed. 15000000 people a year, globally, all tease calais goldman, so me 6 of the story. now over the years, countries have looked for ways in which to circumvent, along to me, fix of climate change. john carrie, the special presidential invoice for permits in the to

a finding administration says that $15000000.00 people have lost their lives due to emissions every single year. his statement is now being challenged by the protect public's trust to an ethics complaint. despite the norm itself, his claim mister kerry, did not cite any scientific evidence for it. now. is there any scientific research finding that 15000000 people the yearly, due to greenhouse gas emissions? mr. kerry, swimmingly misrepresented scientific findings to advance political considerations. climate change is caused primarily by greenhouse gas emissions causing sheets and trapped in to alta with the passions. now the u. s. is by far the largest historically me to responsible for over 20 percent of oil emissions and the u. s. coast behind. however, with one of this information to me seems to deflect and rather suggest that an older population of humans is the bigger contributing factor to this problem.

further insinuating, the africa and her birth rate last way at the home of this issue. i've been to number of african countries where they're very proud of their increased birth rate, but the fact is it's unsustainable for life to the lead loan. when you add the future numbers. can excellence is on typical of, with the number accountability when it comes to the rooms of the world and who bid today to blame it on an africa for centuries, the u. s. has gained in numerous capitalistic ways from burning fossil fuel redress is owed 5, a global north to the global south for the 1st will enrich wisdom countries. we have a high of carbon footprint, but regions most affected by time of change produced, lola carbon emissions. so we all need to be honest about we have would find ourselves. it is true that 20 countries, including the united states, i know responsible for 80 percent of all emissions. it is also true that $48.00

countries seems helps out here in africa are responsible for only 0.55 percent of the total emissions. america has been an emission to d cooler, rise africa, and introduce renewable energy as a face. country is like south africa who are facing some of the west economic crisis due to the energy crisis is pushed more and more away from coal, despite only contributing 1.5 percent carbon emissions from africa as a whole. non fact, some analysts have argued that the rash move away from cold is you to del, south africa deep into a crisis with watching countries like south africa, stuff up at the expense of wisdom images are not say no, guess what we are saying is over the next few years, guess replace as cold or replace this oil, significant proven reserves equivalent to 173.3 times. it's annual consumption, meaning it has about 173 years of coal lift it. advocates slips copious wisdom cash

objections to move us away from the once a. so we have a pos needs to keep a country in the continent field. now the fact that john kerry absolves the carbon footprint from the width and gives it a blanket approach to the world, is mostly and fixed. but as a kid, display of disrespect to africa. when john kerry says mother, nature does not care where those emissions come. this is what about language of skills. some are more responsible for the crisis than others. you know, john kerry africa is the continent that is in milton all to use its own resources to escape. all that to africa is full of cold, but african leaders have been convinced by europeans that the call is batch. meanwhile, european so you can call to stay rich, are we african stupid? the u. k. experienced sweltering with the conditions in the last few days with their reliance on renewables being tested as soon the panels burnt in the heat. but

it was in the wake of time exchange that the national grid requested for 2 units at the wrecks of on. so the prompts to be built into action using what's cool to fly at the demand for air conditioning. so what exactly does this tell us as africans, as we pave, i'm away away from coal. that doesn't slow me for our t to hands back. now the news, the us supreme court has rejected a bid by the navajo native american nations whose skill was, was of the tribe of the reservation struggles with a severe lot of volta infrastructure. but now the whole community says there's over 30 percent of the households like was in several states including arizona, utah, new mexico, back in 2003. the navajo filed a suit against the federal government for faith said access to water. and so it's $21.00 with the san francisco court of appeals sided with the navajo,

allowing them to defend their rights in the supreme court, which now has ruled that's both c, 184918. 68 treats is between federal authorities. and the navajo did not provide quote, affirmative steps, despite those agreements, guaranteeing water resources to the native american reservation. where does the now the nation go from here? to date the assets, to find out what was the rides, the united states, hold for them and produce an experience for me to, to edit american who has spend time at the department of motor vehicles. the neighborhood has waited patiently with someone, anyone to help them all into been sold repeatedly, that they have been standing in the wrong line and must try another to a civil rights. it's any robot. patello says that the us federal government is forcing native american people all fell and lived supreme court is continuing the long american tradition of breaking every single treaty they've made or made of population for the past 300 years. and the western hemisphere of this treaty was

entered into 11868, and a guarantee of the navajo nation are access to their own food, their own waterway. there are on the ability to be a nation within a nation to somebody autonomous from the us government. however, the supreme court ruled today that'd be united states and not have to provide water from the colorado river to the navajo reservation. and this is simply continuation of the us policy of attempting to starve. native americans off their own land, which can then be compet confiscated by set. there were some incorporated to your united states, the main body of politics. you cannot then thereafter safe. well now we started using up all of your resources that we stole from you, and therefore you can't have any of the resources that we have stolen from you. it is an absolutely absurd position. the court is taken. and frank court justice course at a conservative justice appointed by trumps, wrote the dissenting argument in this case where he makes it very clear the united states has continuing their traditions of line to native populations. and if he wants to be a beacon for human rights around the globe,

you have to have those at home 1st. that's right. so now my name is peter scotts and i'll be back again at the top of the hour. the latest news use analysis. why to the same rom just don't have to shape out after kids and engagement equals the trail. when so many find themselves worlds of parts, we choose to look for common ground, the the,

[000:00:00;00] the hello and welcome to cross stock where all things are considered. i'm peter lavelle, western governments and their pliant minions and the media. tell us we must venerate nato as if it were some kind of pious and benign institution. in fact, nato is a very dangerous and aggressive military alliance, and it's in panic mode. the processing the nature of natal, i'm joined by my guess, wilmer leon in washington. he's a political scientist, an author, as well as a radio talk show host and in washington state we have on 3 months down there. he is a writer, as well as a military and political analysts, or a gentleman called sac rules and effect. that means you can jump anytime you want,

and i always appreciate under you, let me go to you 1st and washington. you've got a pro list for the program, much appreciated nato. as i said in my introduction, isn't a state of panic. okay. if they don't let ukraine in which they won't get any time soon, i my money is on that it will never be part of nato. but i will let the people in thing take us than in washington in london, continue with their unicorn dreams. but if i do, if a permanent wait, keep it out, then we have a forever war. because the west is never gonna come to terms of the fact that it lost the conflict against russia. so nato is built itself a very dangerous hand for all of us on the day. in 1940. yeah. when we are most of the shingles off, there should be armies in france and you should remember shore show for plain that's you know, now the united kingdom break break on the in france. i was saying, stayed there. didn't do any good before french austin. know what went on, you know, for british and

a copy ginger. so he's the sanction fee for most approximations. uh and uh, what it needs to be imagined that day for some reason it extends your grade intimate or what they're going to do. you know, so i, it is so ridiculous, so reports for us. it is so piano driven that most people, but i'm updating this serious ma'am. and there is very, very little say, miles, because you're using dupont boston as well, or i absolutely because, i mean, this wasn't very well thought out. obviously we've seen what these people have done with the ip address in a rack with syria. it's the same group of people. okay. and oh, by the way, victoria knew and is in for her 2nd show. and because she was in the binding, the obama administration, when she started all approach shenanigans there with the legal transfer of power in 2014. but, you know, the, they expected the sanctions to work see they believe in these. it means fantasies

that the sanctions would do it and they wouldn't be known. it wouldn't be necessary to, to worry about rushing militarily. they've completely grossly miscalculated and they don't know what to do. because if they, what, if they induct ukraine into the, into the lines, then there's going to be world war 3. okay. then russian will start hitting military bases in poland, okay? but if it doesn't do it, you know, then they're in this case where they're going to try to do it. um, or i've gotta spend 2 point. oh, another 20 year more your thoughts? i don't think well, and i don't think if, if the definition of for away it forever, war is afghanistan, then i don't think that that's where we're headed. because now the global dynamic has shifted dramatically since the united states started the fight in afghanistan. in fact, the global landscape has shifted dramatically since the us provokes the conflict in

ukraine, and it's not shifted in favor of the us. i also believe that the sentiment in the us is shifting away from throwing more money down this dry well called ukraine. the world has developed into a multi polar versus a unipolar world, and this was never about ukraine. this has always been to your point about crippling russia in the industrialized in germany. and some will argue that the ultimate goal is to be china and that you have to go through russia in order to accomplish that. it's never been about ukranian democracy or sovereignty. it was about of the uh if it had been then the us through victoria newland would not have overthrown the democratically elected you on a coal which government. so even though we're seeing the united,

this is really been a money laundering state. yeah. that all the, that, that's what i had mentioned. dana said, i didn't mean the war. i meant the grist keep it. oh then yes, yes, but, but i don't think we're in for another 25 year investment. uh, that's why i think they're even creating money now. what it, what it, uh they, they just, they just uncovered a $6200000000.00 accounting error and the pentagon. they're trying to inject as much money into it now because i think they see the gravy train is coming to a halt. hole in the next and the address that because, you know, i mean nato can start and continue to flood you crane with equipment, but they can flooded with troops unless they want to commit their own troops. i mean, it's been rumored in westberg the go. the polls like foolish, we get involved with their own troops. so unofficially their troops are there

already. i mean, the, this is what, you know, the people are looking at this counter offensive that is going nowhere. would russia then take the offensive once they are counter offensive, sputters out on today. all we need to start with the fact the gun bind, which doesn't cover saucers, the radio flight serious combined war. the combined arms var, rochard from that's still their special melinda operation. as opposed to war, and on a good will there be 40 people there. oscillation, people manuals down lots of down all resources to do anything about this additional like it is. but it happens with this calm but our fanciful, whichever to body mean booting or chevy war. and that is where the, the, the solver place repair on the las strategic reserves. well, for your brain and general of the guide for,

i'm actually this year and i'm paying 20162017. but he has to be, he was on the roof of the past kind, almost long show on the, you know, a letter a few years or whatever the johnston jungle reassurance. and then if you stay there, you will see much more active books from the former asher, which i think is always going to happen. not just do not want to review the precise dates. and i think so, russia will go for their a goals. black sheet goals and now on that some this actually and that will be dead off a final objective both displays what with the special needs or operations. so yeah, we might see some certain things about the positions and especially this morning, myra deals that, well, i do not want them or try to go in there at the station. i see a basic rebuilding where they are do formation. they're a lot of people already. yeah. and even those who have being mobilized,