a good deal on yeah, it's a problem. oh, it's so far for constructing a house. this was in putting them they come in with their families. ended so cause very expensive. and in fact, if you look for a military reason of 4000 and soldier is like nothing. so it doesn't make sense to bring a $4000.00 a german soldier to redo, i'm you have to pay a lot of money. and even as i said, it's a parliamentary army, the drum and the bottle of and a did not degree i'm doing now to bring this to, to bring $4000.00 so the so does outside of government. yeah, i mean, yeah i people keep talking about this every other day. busy so when it comes to the ongoing calls that are in ukraine, at what level do we keep talking about potential escalations, i wanted to ask you, you said this contingent is actually pretty small, a full 1000. so just not so big. i mean, obviously, rusher is, is attempting to man inactive front line districts for nearly a 1000 kilometers. who do you think moscow should consider this a german deployment?

to be a threat in any way that i might be to adjust the end of kind of approval cation, the german government want to go, okay to russian and beloved option government. but if you look for military reasons what it can do, 4000 soldiers, they can do nothing. and of course, as you know, the german army, a lot of equipment, lot of tanks look out for ships in german. i mean, not working the we have to more than those ice our, me because of the last 20 years. government government did not invest a lot of money in the army. so it really tell you it's a cents less. it's the adjustment. and now the new location, which is also sends this and it costs about the money for government tax pay us. so that's the same of the german office. so going to look over german general. it says that the government defense to administer this idea is not a good idea, but you should not do it. and john bonham and did not degree. we have seen the

german army was enough around this time. it was the same most time because because german i'm is only found it for defend the german country and to act inside germany . if somebody takes germany and not to, to work outside the german do. so in my opinion of the soul just should not to go to the to, i'm, you know, is not a good idea. we should take all our soldiers who would stay in foreign countries back home to germany. and we should also stop at bro, okay. do actually have for nothing because it's not our, it's a little bit reading about some endocrine is not a drum and what we should find diplomatic solutions and be stripped, stop the pro monte politics and not to in the new a pull location. good. i mean, you, you called us a sense list for vacation. you also call it inexpensive provocation when you talk about, for example, infrastructure that needs to be set up to house up to full 1000 german troops.

along this way is border with russia. i mean, good. the nato states already have thousands of troops on the ground in pods of eastern europe. why deploy a another brigade independently? what's the point? is it just part of taking a why is it just pointing ticket? just the new point of the location of this though, it was one to 2 point one kid and he did not the, those big mrs own. uh, maybe even if his, his own party did not agree until now. so in my opinion of the rest of the central location, he wanted to do something without thinking about the, about what it follows when he went to do and, and now it's discussed and then, and germany and logo. so people in germany say no. and even of that sorta as we have already, and then the phone and countries be sure to bring all that sort of back to germany . because of government tax fails, pay for it to financing. it doesn't make sense except location and it,

and those costs as, as also the risk of the next world war. if we don't stop to locations until now, i think uh, russian government describes a con, russian government described. ready this kind of meant the don't to does any aggression against the drum in your countries. so we have to, to, to take the diplomatic waitress. big is, uh, is that option for donation and to, to find a solution for crane for us, for germany. the only solution can be, don't finish those of all because german also pay the government taxpayer has paid for $1100000.00. ok, you mean if you choose to be paid already, it isn't quite the amount of time in the meantime with the economy facing now with according a secondary stage of this recession donor linda and a german m p. joining us here if i play goodness a really interesting analysis there. i appreciate your comment. tribble so you

again, sometime soon. thank you. thank you very much. res united gives you a nice evening. thank you you too. so what was i like a thought to be an invitation to put just another interview, sign into john kerry trying to defend decades of us foreign policy in the hot seat or the american especially avoid a crime. it probably didn't plan earlier in the day on have me think of the world that his government invited iraq based on a lie. you americans have committed a crime is aggression to guys, iraq and the country to the south are asking, should george bush be tried? why wasn't george bush tried properly? so you do you support this? no. no, no. because there's never been a direct process or accusation brought up against president bush himself. have there been abuses in the course of that works? yes. why isn't it a crime to invade iraq based on a lie? no, no, no, no. well, you didn't know it was a lie at the time. you know,

the evidence that was produced, people didn't know that it was the lines that it was all, but bush was lying. he was lying d because he, sir, i'm not going to read debate the iraq war with you here. right now we spent a lot of time doing that previously. i was opposed to going and i thought it was the wrong thing to do. but we gave the president the power redirected belief in the congress based on the light. and when we knew it was a lie, people stood up and did the right thing. so stood up, ended up with a quick reminder. of course, american launch is minutes renovation of a rock in 2003. it's small, it's a long time we'll kill hundreds of thousands now. it was all based on claims of baghdad, weapons of mass destruction. at a time, a lot of people knew it was on true, of course later it was the fact one true. we spoke to political and listen, phil make a show on stone, who says, carries deflection simply doesn't hold up because the carriers party is now making that has this position. of course, gary, being the politician that he is. and also i would say hypocrite,

but he is as now saying, well, you can't compare the rock or with this because of the rock where he's saying was not a war of aggression. when he said there was no direct charges like as. and then the peach meant or something. i mean, what, what does that even mean? because when it comes to a powerful countries like united states, basically there is no one to hold the united states accountable in the united states. people themselves don't have enough power over the federal government to really hold, you know, these people accountable for war crimes or, or on unjust war as, for example, things like this. um, so yeah, i mean, it doesn't really mean anything to say that that he wasn't charged. i mean, johnson was in charge for the vietnam war. and, you know, bush senior, wasn't charged for the 1st goal for a bomb. it wasn't charged federal strikes it because it wasn't strong charged to serve anymore. so it means it's kind of a silly thing to say legislation kindly making its way through the us congress. so

to stop funding, the un commission that investigates is riley actions and crimes against palestinians. a reason for that proposal, a republican congressman blame to the continuous criticism of israel, basically it's so in other words, let's get this changed easily. oil is routinely attacked and on the mind to across the entire system while the world's was human rights abuses. to remain, frankly, relatively, i'm touched, the effectiveness and the we just for you, we use so the united nations and you and bodies do not familiar with support. for the un commission of inquiry investigates is riley violations of international law, particularly human rights abuses and the palestinians in occupied territories. the u. s. is the u. n's biggest contributor to the proposed budget costs would amount to over $700000000.00. and washington also aimed to will eliminate the office of

a special representative published in unit affairs that is inside the us state department. so we heard from a pro palestinian activist from jerusalem on what is a very sensitive topic. is there any forces have up as we understand killed a $112.00 palestinians. uh since uh, january that is uh between january and i may of this year its a apparently i'm old and died during the same period last year. well i, we spoke to a number of issues about this. i have to listen to this in the support thing, the is a prototype, ignition against palestinians and so forth. thing is that a violation of human rights of palestinians. they are supporting the violation of the international law. but is it a, this is what america is when it comes to, to, for us the news, even if it is that i wouldn't throw on that to make them on guys, up the americans will do nothing. and they will keep on throwing value and, and,

and, and not sticking any see this step against. busy any as a good issue. so this is the equation in, in, inside both congress and on the white house. the americans keep listening to a fax to the jewish not be in washington. see these eats, they keep listening to that. i mean, globally is a, goes to the present sniff in yahoo and they don't want to listen to the palestinians. they don't want to see the students. israel is moving forward with plans to build more settlements on palestinian land in the west bank. it is despite the global community, even america, condemning those moves as a legal well, the $5000.00 homes are set to be built, but as for now and those specific dates have been set up for the development. but us has now stopped funding scientific research with his rarely academic institutions in the west bank. and it doesn't seem to be backing the middle eastern

country entirely on many coal unit, lateral expansion. you've been very clear about this, that unilateral actions such as this one, such as settlement advancement, will only insight tensions. and under 9 the prospect of a 2 state solution wiley, we spoke with the palestinian analyst on his riley affairs. he says that washington's criticism of the jewish settlements on palestine yolanda the end of the day don't ever lead to any actions being taken against, telling me that the additional position they always say that they are against the to prevent policy. but they make no action. can the united states it's, it's the, uh, what all is it i am, i assume it is where i can give you like their time from spending a donation to sit there for months. and so is there not any organization working on the links for 3 months and at least bank? no, they don't do that. so if they feel please donate these action these activities go

on and they do nothing except the issue and get statements when they make is that a implement? and then they are billing. but i think by keeping, by doing this me out on leave and cutting june as an end to continue to it's fullest. they, we, he aware of what we see. no action. i guess don has some of the us embassies, deputy chief of mission for questioning over a controversial statement about fighting terrorism in the south asian country, taking a what it considers the american support for geneva india have atlas the pakistan's concerns and disappointment at the unwarranted one sided and misleading references to it in the joint statements were convey to the us side. it was stressed that the united states should refrain from issuing statements that may be construed as an encouragement of india is baseless and politically motivated, narrative against pakistan. it was also emphasized the counter terrorism

cooperation between pakistan in the us had been progressing well and then in enabling environment centered around trust and understanding was imperative to further solidifying pakistan us ties. well, in the joint statement that pakistan took issue with us president biden, and india is prime minister cold on his mom about to ensure that his territory is never used for any terrorist activities of the us state department echo that signed him and just days later. and even gave a backhanded compliment to pack us, don praising its anti terror efforts by saying so much more still needs to be done . we remain committed to working with pakistan to address the shared threat posed by terrace groups throughout the region. we do recognize that pakistan has taken some important steps to counter terrace groups in line with the completion of its financial f, as in task force action plans at the same time. however, we have also been consistent on the importance of pakistan continuing to take steps

to permanently dismantle all terrace groups, including locks are a to you, but chase and mohammed and their various front organizations. well, adult maria saltado, head of the south asian strategic stability institute. i just spoke with archie about washington's history of using terrorism about, excuse me, fighting terrorism in other countries. we would have appreciated this comment. i had it not being the fact that the united states actually left us on this done with isaac left on this done with one trillion dollars that the us defense budget being spent over there and, and the entire region in the mess. and as you are there russia, if i could sun china, i've kind of sun and even iran and it, given the rest of the region is suffering not only refugee influx we suffering through film and drug trafficking, the stuff in with the kind of that some of the biggest drug problems, and most importantly be, or even not short, it's either the cells uh, you know, has actually less of kind of son. so the bigger question is, is that if you are fighting against terrorism and it is no big country after i've

got a son just given so many lives, a flip, our fight against that hasn't been focused on some details and focus on these have lost their lives the, the net amount of damage. sure country has run into billions of dollars. it's not trillions. and then they have the audacity to tell us that we should do more. i think this would have been a practical and wise had been most left of kind of stunning a mess and had be all much depth with the us intervention. msm aware tourism has been a natural outcome from the places where they have a phone from the city from. meanwhile, they ron is i dedicated an entire week to exposing a well us double standard builds on human rights, shutting life on washington's actions. in the early days off of the islamic revolution, that's a shed, some light on this is a corresponding yusef, just a recounting and exposing the american human rights. this is the theme of this conference held into wrong in that shedding why somebody us rights abuses, any of our officials, rights activists and victims of us sanctions on the wrong are present here to

provide physical evidence. so be us as dual take on the issue of human rights, maybe patients and and this is, was a function of the start and you as a life, as a patient, like other people that's today are here. are patients, butterfly patient tell us of the patient and they have lots of problem and the about their drugs in death situation from one or 2 years that we can we can do indeed our button binders are uh drugs from uh, another country, canada i bluetooth the us claims that medicine is exempt from the sanctions. but here's an interesting point. there are different types of sanctions direct and

indirect. but the type of sanctions that have never been addressed, or the networks sanctions, which do not allow me to conduct banking transactions with entities that transform my payment to the pharmaceutical companies. such sanctions prevent me from working with medical firms. events comes as far as the annual patient and the american and human rights where it talks, the series of tragic incidents. any law, all falling within the same time frame when hundreds of iranians were killed in 2 years after the victory up in 1979 is mama trevor, those rights activists here say, you know, those instances support for something. it was can be traced. one of the most tragic incidents was the 1988 downing of an iranian airliner by the u. s. navy, which killed all the 290 people on board the doing plane for 35 years on there. one is, are still waiting for an apology. from washington, i believe that that's a captain of the ship william rogers. maybe it was his name rogers. i know his last

name is rogers. uh. i believe that he knew it was a passenger plane and he was ordered to to shoot it down. and uh, unfortunately, hundreds of innocent people lost their lives its, it's a great tragedy. i, i'm not aware it maybe maybe they did, but i'm not aware of the us government ever paid any kind of reparations or damages to the iranian families that sent lost family members on that flight. in 1981, the notorious terrace groups majority in a common organization known as the m k. o m u k. well, i'm the headquarters overwhelms as well. i'm a group of party dealing several officials, including your ones. then just as chief mohammed, the history activists, abm, toyota, our group has enjoyed significant support from washington website. all you is at the chevy and one of the in humane actions carried out by the moon, off in your head, deemed have led their supporters to stop backing them. despite their 40 years of

support for the m k. o, the west had to finally retreat from the tower group and can no longer rely on them . the us says use the m k o as a criminal tool over the past 40 years. but now it has come to realize that it has stained its reputation with the m k o n. this has forced to us to back down on the group. the m. k. o was also allegedly responsible for the assassination of topic iranian nuclear scientists. in the 20 ten's, we're going to choose a cecelia to have engineered guitar attacks. but the most recent one was the assassination of top your money and military commander. general ross, i'm sorry, money. this time, washington admitted, but it directly carried out would be attach. i gotcha. although the american officials have tried to justify their actions, we have talked to international rapid to, from the un like missed call the marks to confirm the international crime committed by the us. and declared that the assassination of general solve money is a blatant human rights violations on an international scale. goes on us has lost

its for whole video on since more than 4 decades ago. memories if left in the country seem to be indelible, this is not the end of the story yet. washington continues to create even sweeter memories for the one. yes, as it intensifies, it's harsh as the sanctions where she wanted one with her one does humanitarian side effects all with impunity. usability are too well. meantime, era and as us rush to help it develop 10 new oil and gas fields is supposed to be. but really, and this of dollars as we continue to see mega partnerships being stage to meet the process of being most of what we are back to with the, [000:00:00;00]

the, the welcome to was a part. historically, any new technology has been matched with a mix of fear and excitement, but the advent of artificial intelligence has created a new possibility of humans becoming redundant, if not completely obsolete, would be a revolution already on the way calculus to set the rules and the boundaries both for themselves and for that latest creation. we'll discuss them now and join, but g, l e s a n a i f, assist and an expert on india and a i. mr. ellis is great to talk to thank you very much for your time. thank you very much, i'll sign up or having me in the show on that. also for choosing this i don't think

because the video 11 does days most of ours. absolutely. and let me start with the, perhaps a very personally biased question because you know, after years of my covering, uh, global politics and seeing how decisions are made and implement that i have huge doubts about ethics because we live in a day and age when the, the influence of vested interest is enormous when i disregard will just feel values, but basic humanities all around. sorry, i think it's very hard to believe that anything faces this cost can be implemented truthfully as a policy. what makes you hopeful about that? the copies walk? it keeps us going right. whether rates, uh, not just about technology, but in general, i like that to be honest. i'm not that of domestic ven, yasu pointed out like, oh, how much will be the implementation bar when it comes to. right? because as we have seen, the ethics, i think of watching or ethics, why say right?

but companies like to go minds. they have you care about the ethics, right? i think in recently you'll see as homework by the creator of the be the coming and say, oh it does is scary, but then the rest and why did you release it, right? why, why? i mean they're being deleted. so the, if you look at the original, hoping i the whole company started to save you money from me. i. and then you launch this to what i'm going to for the in between. and then you've got mine's, i'm worried about this thing. so this raises the question, right, how much, how much all worries, genuine, in this case, us. so i'll be hosting from time to time, brother, we have talking about climate change or any of those things, right? it's, it's very difficult to get people behind on the go. uh, or how do i say social goals and, but now that we are in, that's right off. uh, let's do people losing job like a border maybe gilbert to have this as being made by the stores. we have to do something about it. let's, let's talk about that in detail because, um,

you also have a, someone geopolitical perspective because you mentioned that the, a i asked is discourse a for now. it least is dominated by the western prospectus and south course from lack of diversity. can you give some examples of that? so uh, ethics is that's up to the corporate culture, right, of how people both see you. so i kind of things is not the same. the other part of the word, the same business with you. for example, i will give you 2 countries, claudia, and about these 2 countries. i'll share and then i'll go to our federal technology . right. and the job will be done to batch them together as is ation economic powerhouse us. but when you look at how they approach they, i do recently it's, it's a totally different idea. for example, victorian policy makers has laid it out that a i is a to it, right? it should be to buy to buy a human. so let's have the extreme and of a spectrum. you know, i as a do it as you like, jump round. they being, they have a robot run day, how robots i can get of the other. so it's

a lot more how does a good a bit technology right now, the japanese documents tutors and these, these are these look for building society by, by and all where humans a i, n, roll woods reside together. so the extreme end of the spectrum, no. europe, the house on very between rachelle and how to get this done. but of you, you as an hour difference, i'm going to vote and get it all ready for somebody to get someone on the hills privacy right. the to comes to is done go just like a very many people lives the live, enjoy the family. the idea of privacy may be very much different from lot and person in the house, right? oh, okay, but privacy is something that essentially directional within. but when we deal with the artificial intelligence, it's essentially dealing with the collective psyche because artificial intelligence feeds on the big data and, you know, simple logically, you know, all societies a different because they, you know, approach was problems in a different way. and that was chris, genuine diversity if, as you say,

the current discourse and perhaps the current technology, to some extent is dominated by one strand of thought, one way of flies. isn't there a threat of extinction? north of humanity, but as these diversity within key humanity evidently, definitely. so there is this uh, business part. explain monday enough and also be under to explore the tony problem . right. you have a tony that is coming out of control. you have a live art and you can change the task of the 20 by the 20 by default is going to the left track. there. find people are crap. and by pulling deliver you can change of direction to the right track. but only one person who stop. so this question is, what do we wow, that's impressive. now i keep asking this question, i know, or i need someone from a new country or a new region i'll discussing immediately. so it's quite clear, if i offer specials or anyone from you or all, or doing extra for me to go, they will say they won't do anything. because 1st of all, the europe is generally st. by pulling the,

the work they're migrating one person to save the fight. i like my present, but they're modeling one person, right? i the same time, some people, the one person's life easy, very valuable as a find people. but when you bring this question to india or china or some, you know, you shouldn't go to this thing, finalized is always bigger than one. so this is now imagine this guy know the got lots of bits of driving car. dude, i said active managers and like the what is the philosophy, what? uh, mr. ellis, this is a very interesting uh, foster experiment to consider, especially given again, the current state of jail. polk is because, uh, western countries historically have lunch for more wars with 5 bigger a. that's those them, any of these certain kinds of countries that's supposedly i'm not concerned about the value of a single human life now. you politically and i think it's unlikely as well. the world is moving away from western head,

germany and towards more diversity towards multiple direct to do you see the same tribe happening in the field all a i i think one good example. i think the vehicle thinking about they are people tends to avoid talking about china because they've been doing some phenomenal work . i mean increasing the starting. i have done, but please more i got big was than us. right. there's even a saying that's i know he's leading, they are right now who's looking at, you know, so yeah, it has like a totally different already do from what you guys or jane or anyone is putting forward. right. became old as a. we know. yeah. you're right. because we are the biggest export of the talented may, i may be on the sunday i'd be been always also, but with the technology, we have a program we're going to be home. fantastic. i and i kind of because of choosing be decided to choose a i, to sort of ours, which you like all the problems like the big created this, say i start to do, besides is a, i for all we want. overhead gave all those to be at those, but they, i be fixed. if there is an educational issues, we are the other day i because over to the biggest economic sector,

the media of it on was the bus and it was a what, what those boys been bored. we want to make it more efficient by using. yeah. that's why we been doing a no easy this language models coming out. and why do we have them to behave use their language models. and we used a program called box of need, which is a national, a language drive relation initiated you because we are going to do over so language on hundreds or on numbers of languages. so we use this box any layer, i'm the upgrade to do was to rich people to access these kind of phenomena language model technology, right? you tell people who can speak to these models through this process, my voice and of a get done with the benefits of get farmer wisely and many other things. so that's where we've been doing. i'm done. that's where we want to be. the leaders will be start off, acknowledge it across the board. and that sounds very inspiring because you know, and your work and provide many examples of how

a i can narrow uh the gaps that the exist between privileged and disadvantaged groups done at least bring some very message certain development. and i think an argument can be made that there is a natural synergy, you know, between a i and such huge countries like india or china that you are bound to use, big data. but all always in the west of your here, this here are all of those big browser at the top of tyron control. and what have you do those issues concern you? are they as much a read to you as a, to some of your western colleagues? yeah, i think this is one thing, so when i even know where i tell them when i'm working they i, someone from us or some of us immediately brings of the dominator, or are we going to be leaving under at a i rule, our machines are going to take over, but if i to the is my job safe. so there is this different bus. thank you, right? the focus, more on jobs, understood what it would perhaps play that and i and i, and gotten those rolling,