this advisory proves done that please bring some very necessary development, and i think an argument can be made that there is a natural synergy, you know, between a i and such huge countries like india or china that you're bound to use big data, but always in the west, you're here, this fear all of those big browser at the tall attire and control and what have you do those issues concern you? are they as much a read to you as a to some of your western colleagues? yeah, i think this is one thing. so when i even know where i tell them when i'm working, they, i, someone from us, or someone from us, immediately brings of the dominator. or are we going to be living under at a rule or machine or they're going to take over. but if i to the is my job safe. so there is this different bus, but the right, the focus more on jobs. and as opposed to doing, it says, well, it would perhaps play that and i and i, and got a new role in your rising today. i of this monster, but it's like, uh, i'd like

a hammer. if i have another number, i can use it to put a name on my wall and the same number i can use the deluxe on wednesday. if it's the person who is folding the home or no, you don't, people like it on the coming all those to be the extension of the printer. so that a, i move dominique, the thing is binding me by an agent and it doesn't how any motion. it doesn't have to go through human evolution, right? the dominant, straight v, how us you must be titled into associated with the intelligence and vp something far into the board to do that. that's i wasn't sure. but mister ellis, this is a very interesting question to consider again as an assist or as a philosopher, because i am for one the, a big fan of the ancient history, ancient literature. and what strikes me is a sort of this humanize ation of the humans that is going on. i mean, the split between the mental intellectual capacity of the psychological or ethical capacity, which always distinguish us as

a species. and i think my concern is that any new technology comes to, to him would charge a certain aspect of our nature and desensitized another. and i wonder how does a i play into that? is it more likely to balance those in balance is, or is it more likely to exacerbate them? so it just depends on how we build the suicide. it'd be be how to control it. right now if you go to judge b d, all right, which is a very powerful language model. you oscar to do some let's i really don't, i'd wise or advice or government currently doesn't do that. why? because of the program to ensure that these kind of advisors are not given out, right? so these are being brought down by too much control by us. now, because the humans are the smartest, let's say smart doesn't go video to advise be in the bottom being that i'm donating the spot. but so be things on something that more smarter than us to end up dominating or, you know, look at the history of going in isn't many billions of right the orders of the

civilization mclension. we advise technology ended up taking or colonizing the lower one. but here, the prism is a, i doesn't the power in need to don't mean it's a do it right now. it all depends on how well it's a to, if you are a south korean the right. but the, as you said before, if you are, let's say a japanese, you're more likely to see it as a partner. um, i've heard you say that when we move on that spectra and allow, you know, more of a partner life qualities to the allows for the who are realization of its positive potential. can you explain what it means because it sounds like actually giving up the controls and, and trusting yourself to them own really shouldn't be sure. so the thing is, be sure to call the check points, which are now guidelines frameworks or do accept regulation to ensure that they, i will often know this framework or does this all we shouldn't be going on, right? so that's all the but i'm worried mostly that can sense of what is the current

situation possible, the dependency people are taking. so you just leave the advisors that come into this language more of the house and up wasn't already committing suicide in bed. you originally, based on the top of the job board, we're seeing and maybe are there is something going on by would you be the that you'd be the grunge, you'd be the now people be broad going to this model. so really just that, why is that even do they get that you like and why they're really just people are, why do they act up on these things? like certainly the job situation. i mean my, my biggest worry at this point is job. i've used recently. oh, i saw that one of the indian memory, but like thyroid are on the read the number of people because that incorporating a i and to rewrite the house environment document board took saying that almost kind of a big of a 1000000 full time jobs are exposed organization, now, people to try to balance a new kind of jobs are coming in, right? but my question here is, imagine you are a copier and it's our 50 and on the computer you are a job is not taken over by

a language. yeah. you invested a lot of money and a lot of the, of your life into this craft and then all of a sudden, i mean soul and they weren't really are totally doors very there are new kind of don't. yeah. like that. and then burger king. right. our the find the item, the doesn't make any sense. absolutely. well, what makes sense is taking a short break right now, but they will be back to these fascinating conversation and the moment, stay tuned. the so what we've got to do is identify the threats that we have. it's crazy from foundation. let it be an arms race is on all sides. very dramatic. the only personally, i'm going to resist. i don't see how that strategy will be successful,

very political time. time to sit down and talk the welcome back to was a part of ellis, i'm a i ethicist as an expert on engine a i, mr. ally. as of before the break with mentions dipping into sections between the, the field, a religious or theological studies and the a i essex. and i heard you say that what does it in particular offers a very distinct way of thinking of are those technologies? can you elaborate in that? yes, so i think a lot has to come from this book written by those. uh, uh, i got a mission, right. the famous all had hung love. don't you ever been up and dusting book that

looks like they are coming up with this perspective. now, the whole question about, let's say we create a sending machine re b, b. so now when we send out an hour away, i'd be having to create or, or the general dentist which will be equal into humans. and uh, you know, send in machines which got be and do other things right now lets it'd be operator, but anything i want to do with this um, from what i, how that's anything sending hassar got to be 100 human. it should how it has a saw. i bought it, but this billing is really bright. and then if that's the case, then what about human rights? does it apply to these indian machines? then? what about labor laws? so the actual don't as much is already though as of work. so that's a question, right? the moment of your intelligence assessment in the machine, then the whole questions will come, right? the be able to create us, we are becoming creat all intelligence, right? so that means that the not only distresses we're coming to, but i'm to be honest,

we don't have any answers at this point. there is a difference between uh, artificial intelligence and artificial consciousness. can you explain what's the boundary between the 2 of them? so what we, how right now is, uh, so the field of technology goes along, back 5060 or above the age old i yeah. right. age and income. do despite like, uh, even sounds barbie's idea pretty easily. but yeah, the opportunity to go must go in and produce like, but we have gone through many models, many male building, then we have this machine learning deep learning, which does take us and so far. now what we, how is a more than one thing? very good, right? charge you with a gun, right? edit do almost anything effectively with to or maybe better than the magenta. again, do paintings. amazingly, right? dot again the it may just bark a judge of really gone through a few minutes or a body drawn to go forward, right on say. so once you build

a doors that can do multiple things, or why don't you build a i to, is that, let's say, based on the and that is, that is capable of identifying itself as an entity. i think that's what i use a lot to pursue, a consciousness is being created. and the problem is recently, i think, i think the advice 6 months ago or 67 months ago, there was this uh, gentleman called blake when he was an engineer with blue blue. she was working on this long don't we just move his language mode. he actually said the model of the game turned in on people. i mean, i, i, i don't really do much better because we still are very at least asian dental. but i don't know what he was gone bids that this model was sent in both of our i to badge mental health issues already. now the question is, nor did more of us india and or not, but how it will make us believe, right when you try to talk to you, ask it. otherwise, it gives you a very solid advice that upon you are starting to think that this is

a conscious entity, right? this is not just a computer program that is only good in trouble understanding the sequence of words organic. that's what is perspective helps here as well. because, you know, what's important ultimately in the religious way of life is the transition from suffering to freedom. but suffering is very important. that's where the sort of the work of the soul happens. that's where you actually build up consciousness. and if that comes to you as old resumes or you know, past package, the question is, um, you know what the real humans do with that? because i know, for example, from psychologist managers, i college is extremely concerned about the use of, let's say, pornography right now. not because of any and like moral issues, but because humans lost the ability to communicate with other humans because they don't like suffering. they don't like frustration, they look for easy waste for themselves, but you know that, that seems like a very direct way to again, to humanizing. yeah,

that's true. i'm the more you under my products, like you pointed out the japanese they are doing it, but the more you angle more pride this to is it. oh it's our behavior. like the bought it. all right, there are, there are use cases where uh, i think i recently saw a b, b school, a kindergarten teacher saying usually the baby. so comes to the board, call her mom the teacher because. ringback happens right, there's a young kid, right? i accidentally, but now they're, they all going her. alexa, in human that psych here we always have these sort of conflict between homeostasis and these try for novelty. and we have a bias for homeless spaces, but the lives sort of pushes us so often in very uncomfortable ways to a to was normal to i wonder if that something like that could be configured into the a i algorithms. and again, is that safe? because you will have to, you know, receive that some level of control for that. so i think this are, you know, a d,

right, that's what we need our brand new use this document, or i think it's being already being done through social media and all right. this is the whole amount of pollution that's happening now with a i think a, we don't know what to be the next agent a i right, that's the, that's the reason why i going to give you a great answer by the, by the time the independence normalization things without change, right? because of the only thing we are portable at these predicting our own future. so we, we don't know what will happen, right? that whole different comes with a or a thought about how these companies, you know, whether it's met or microsoft or google, or whoever wants to use it, right. of course they, they all are using is going to go to them. you know, if the dog died starting tomorrow, are using it right to do that sense of novelty. no, you find that on a very important point to work on. real estate is right vs. so that's a really long time using but be more than all of that. how do i status go? that's somebody be humans, preferably and that's large,

be helping. so you just recently, right? we had a small, small doors that gave a little bit a little bit later. but convenience, i know when this genie is out of the border, people are starting to i keep getting bad. i mean, for 20 years and i keep mentioning others always do brokers right. things will change, but everyone likes to believe that things are going to be the same going for you also mentioned in your reading something very interesting. and this is sort of, uh, a i being wise because of the historical bias because it fits on big data. and obviously, if you know any big data is a reflection of our current state of affairs with the intrinsic historical discrimination or privilege. is there a best point of time i at least are there any ways all accounting for that? yeah, so a bias has to be in a model for a long time. man, advisor, read be as you go forward as well. so there isn't nothing, it's pretty much done by this this uh, academy ship bought us called back. i,

i'm not sure i'm to pronounce your name, right. she used to judge you, be the do how that going was a i have i from the doesn't about adult under notice, but it always ended up referring the doctor and i think he and the nurse as she now she makes it up again. the female isn't those doctors always the me, the nurses always, the theme is a big scandal. so show us the model or more over on the bus or from have already there. now the problem be addressing bias is that technology or technologist then do i, that's a good by adding more technology, right? they believe that this technology so it does solution is i'm a pro. so i do have a problem with the video and fixed by adding more technology and a more of the technology you, i, the better you will get. but that's as far as most of the problem we have is that the dental ignore my disciplinary approach. a hearing or speak. uh, it makes me wonder what is actually a known by state. is it just something that is scientifically proven and measured?

and if that's the case, then that the real exclude, they're very large portion of human existence. i think i'll tell you what we also have a good rest of the relative clause and you are what these are known by us do so far that i can say, i began to say it just a i, but even the definition of just done just as it is always already but, but i want want guns. i, i want to diag won't discriminate. people based on certain elements like gender, ethnicity or race color language that will big would start. right? due to how right? but so, so imagine you're, i'm a government, i'm a person of color and i'm going for an, i mean, i'm interested, i'm going to, i'm going for it by do something to, to alone application. now if it is, i don't know if it is this commentary towards me, that's a case of advice or we'll see him. this is gone. but the final obligation out toward the us does the system use right? well, it was giving a lower risk or for white man who uh, who, who are on

a surfboard condition, or it can be different also uh sort of uh sort. why would be the blockage by giving a higher score even though they were also has more about this of, i'm either on or some of these things like that, right? so these, this is the, is, is it the is, it is something that is convent upon out of the humans to do it within our own soul, rather than trying to outsource it to some technological to them. because on some level it's very convenient. but at the same time, i mean, what makes you manage the unique is our log nature. i mean, we all have very unique filters onto this reality. and this is ultimately, you know, the, the beauty of, uh, the spacious. so the, the more we tried to create the good by the technological means the, the more just stop and to be frank with you sounds. and that's why i, that's why i believe, you know, i am or i or this is are. and what do we need more ideas? we know more day was best with the right. what is right done wrong. we're supposed to decide those things when you have more, but the more people from more,

for example there's, there's a report that says dot and i'm going to get house or create. at that point every 6 seconds. i'm based on that. many of the stores are on the bills, right? the homework numbers. how many of those are now there is another 5 that will say that congress, like most of the, which i was only 6 percent of the country. i think the only thing is 30. how. what is there a presentation in your building to was know you better give me the it's not limited to us. it's the but i think the finding, the 2nd largest user often do be doing it a did use the word as you're building towards that to use every there and your best buy has more of the people sitting in dividing. how really, how well, like you bought it, all these different ideas are no different way of looking at the what are different kinds of will be address or incorporate or. so that's why i think you say you need that. i have, i only have less than a minute for that question, but it's the most interesting question for, for me, because ultimately, you know,

human intelligence is not just the intelligence. it's not only about the brain is not only about the body, it's about the soul. and it's about the rational about the feelings, and ultimately it's about a connection with the divine. do you think technology can ever be installed? that's a $1000000000.00 rest in the house. 30 seconds to answer. i don't think. i don't think it's a good idea to see technology as a replacement for over spirituality or our spiritual belief, stride those, those are a baby on done technology that doesn't do well. and that may be the argument against the entrepreneur filing this technology too much because there is a certain uniqueness insistent dignity, flawed dignity in being human. and perhaps the vicious intelligently and consciously tried to preserve that true. i think i'm not of out of under more wisely, but everyone sees an easy way of getting more people to adopt this technology. by under more pricing, it is easier. so it's about the, i don't,

but it's also easier to get it misused. anyway, is it in a fascinating conversation? thank you very much for that, mr. ellis on our does lessons and thank you for watching hopes to see her again. and it was a part of the, [000:00:00;00] the, the,

the, the issue. because you have defended the constitution as well as the lives, security, and freedom of our fellow compatriots. you have essentially saved our country from a civil war. the move in years saw that the russian people were not on their side and the rest are present or right. the bottom imprudent stein thing. russian service man who counts with the bod. no new to me. saying that loyal service prevented a loving, simple. united states seeks to stop funding the un body, which is in charge of investigating his writing crimes against palestinians. meanwhile, television funds to build thousands more of new homes on contested other stimuli

also added this house program a un next about cold on washington due on. so for the abuses inflicted on inmates to know torres, one of them, of a sense of saying that us owes an apology, as well as a long overdue closure. all that comes in jupiter and they rhonda indicates an entire week to exposing what it calls us human rights double standards, highlighting washington's options in the early is often based on make revolution, but did till hundreds of iranian citizen. the, all right there, shortage of news of this hours program here at all to international and a 0 main stream. narratives on this channel is time for your new life from us. and so the russian president, vladimir putin has addressed the members of the countries armed forces at the

kremlin, finding them full, preventing a civil, let's shoot, it goes to the certainly stores you have defended the constitution as well as the lives security and freedom of our fellow compatriots, you have essentially saved our country from a civil war foot you just in a difficult situation. you pass your loyalty to the people of russia and your devotion to your military oath. you showed responsibility for the motherland and its future. we did not have to remove any battle units from the combat zone. comrades of ours have fallen in the fight against the mutineers. the mutineers saw that the russian people were not on their side when it gets to you. while they are russian leader also have commented on the government's relationship with the bob ned group, he did ultimately admit that the private military company has been fully financed by moscow sticker states and ask for the wagner group. we always treated as fighters and commanders with great respect because of the courage and heroism they

had been showing you to our soldiers and officers of the russian army as well as volunteers worked in combat conditions with no less dedication and also showed her wisdom and self sacrifice at the same time, those who served and worked in the doctor group were respected in our country. and i also want to note that the maintenance of the entire faulkner group was fully provided by the states. we fully financed this group from the defense ministry and the state budgets due from may 2022 to may, 2023. the state allocated 86262000000 roubles to wagner for monetary maintenance and incentive payments. meanwhile, the neighboring bell arose, the army has been put on full combat readiness. the country is president alexander, to look a shanker, to live at that update in his 1st speech following the fail bogged them using the head of states that the events in russia were of key concern as both nation share a common homeless. it was a, one of

a threat posed against by the roost by certain western apartments. and while you somewhere questionnaire catch up, one of the most ventures think as i understood it was not the situation itself with how it might have developed with all the consequences to follow. that was the most dangerous thing. i also understood that a brutal decision was made, judging by the implication of put in speech to eliminate that. i suggested that wouldn't, should take his time. let's talk to pre gordon and he's can monitors. i said. bill, russian president, alexander lucas angle made a speech at today's ceremony while conferring the rank of general the leaders of the nation's law enforcement agencies. in his speech, he spoke about his role in resolving the recent crisis in russia. as lucas inter noted, the threats of russia collapsing would also be a threat to bubble roofs, which would surely quote,

parish under the rubble comparing what happens to the attempted coo and bell ruse 3 years ago. a little different goes, trust that quote, color revolutions don't happen without a reason. nevertheless, it was not without external influence. as the west poses a threat by actively expanding the need to block. the president spoke of constant provocations on the country's borders withdrawal and flying in horses being dropped minds being planted. and the military installations being built particularly in ukraine in this regard, moscow in minsk find themselves in the same boat as, according to look into the west, would take advantage of the turmoil. it's just a quick reminder of what happened. saturday. is wagner forces to control over the russian and southern, come out and send her on the rough stuff on don't offer the group claim that its own comes behind the front lines. i mean targeted by russian armed forces. moscow dismissed the allegations of this information involved in a group of bonds through 3 russian regions. so that in march to moscow, before

a southern stoppage happened, delfino agreement was struck between the ballad, russian president and the wagner chief in coordination with boot and the broker deal. so forces turn around and head back to their original bases. now as are the events unfolded and no wagner ran to the real stuff ridge and the articles appeared in western media, speculating whether or not this was the end of vladimir putin. us sentence, lindsey graham chimed in and openly expressed. it is his desire for the downfall of the russian president. meanwhile, republican presidential candidate nikki haley, accused joe biden and come out of harris of missing the opportunity to take advantage of the crisis and russia. this weekend's events show that the russian leadership is in a week or position and the ukrainian leadership is called presidents. vitamin harris weren't asleep at the switch. we could be sending a real message, not just to russia, but to the dictators in china and iran,

as well. but it was 24 hours a shuck russia. was it a wake up call a bad omen? was the president, the fellow roost really the one that say the russian federation and how the whole military newton, the come to effect and then phase lot of questions and offices right. and how it ought to be thought. com, the, the key pass our last offer, the former us president brock obama who just admitted the crimea, had a compelling interest to re unite with russia and advise that would be a great enterprise and added that instead of such statements, obama should look within and admit to the mistakes that he's made in the ukraine of that time is not the frame that we're talking about today. there's a reason why there was not an armed invasion of try me, or because crimea was full of a lot of russian speakers. and there was some sympathy to the view that russia was

representing of interest the right at the time the, the granting parliament itself still had a number of russian sympathizers and the politics inside ukraine were more complicated. weird. and most importantly, what for if mister brock obama publicly states that russia's annexation of crime in 2014 was legal and justified. then we should not be surprised that today there is a full scale russian aggression in europe and a large scale war of aggression, those taking hundreds of thousands of lives. and that international law practically does not exist. maybe it's time to started meeting critical mistakes instead of coming up with new excuses. slaughter of falling crude as how often do you credit and government in february 2014, a thousands of people flooded the streets of crime is larger city. expressing that distrust of p a less than a month later. the crime in parliament dates vote to join russia. the decision was cemented when a referendum was held,

and over 90 percent of voters did choose to leave it praying. however, for some powers still ultimately say no to recognizing the results of that by russia is been working hard to create a pretext for being able to invade further. brushes, talked about russian speaking minority citizens or under siege. they're not referendum in the crime. it is illegitimate. and illegal, it was spetchko together in 10 days and held a point of the russian collection in february and march of 2014. russia carried out it's an exception of the crime me and peninsula through brutal force. best buy more now, causing lots of political analysts or joining capital. joining us now from powered . why here we're knology international joint. it's always a great pleasure to have you on this program. always appreciate your insight on your comment for you. we were just showing pictures of what was that referendum

vote for those of primary to join the russian federation. and i, frankly, i'll never forget it. i remember cnn was on location. my for my colleague, michael to whom was, was a withdrawal costing life from crimea. he was surprised to say we were saying 3 generations of people voting, a grandparents parents that they're even brought that kids as well with a line of people going around the city blocks. and, and, you know, honestly, the western media didn't know what to say, frankly, in a here we have a rock, obama left office over 6 years ago. now finally admitting that cry, millions were largely in favor of joining russia. john, how we get into this point. now, why is obama saying this now? do you think i a little harder for show normal for asking a question. he, he hasn't done no, a lot of interviews that are subject to the interviews on, on his for policy. so i think it was, you know, one of those moments where the question gets asked and you dig and you get an