successful, very good. i think it was time time to sit down and talk the . the headlines on off the international testified. whitehouse is points to dispatch deadly plus the problems to ukraine, munitions that germany is against the sending. well, nato maintains a neutral stop radioactive water is those have to be pumped off to the coast of japan. as to china comes down on the sea, food imports. all those details are outside the company. we are not in the manner in which a lot of other countries are they have already matter. we cannot make objectives to india as foreign minister was on

a 4 day visit to the east africa nation of tons. any of the g 20 chair, a new delhi focus is on building ties with emerging economies of the global south. and it's growing multi po, the what the news without the predictable mainstream narrative, your top storage right now. what else, the international and straight to the united states, where despite the pledge to phase out cluster munitions in 2016 because of the risk the civilians, washington is now announced have plans to send a controversial weapons to key f. the ukraine has been requesting cluster munitions in order to defend its own sovereign territory. the cluster munitions that we would provide have done rates far below what russia is doing. we're closely coordinating with ukraine as it has requested these munitions. ukraine is committed to post conflict, the mining efforts to mitigate any potential harm to civilians. as weapons are

quite powerful, they're quite destructive. now they've been used by both parties currently in ukraine, so they're not a new edition. but what is new is that, you know, the fact that the us who is claiming not to be a party to the conflict is yet again taking another escalade. we step at us itself stopped using these weapons, used them in the rack, and use them in previous conflicts, of course, but stopped using them in 2016 themselves to start to stockpile the munitions. now it says it wants to sort of start forwarding to forwarding them into this. the me going to renew crane the reaction even from us base to human rights groups, which is unusual, has, has been one of condemnation. and you know, they cite the destructive power of these weapons and these are dpi, cm's, you know, at the dual purpose and prove cluster munitions which can disperse tiny bomb. and it's over at large areas. and they have huge destructive power on the battlefield.

but they also leave the potential for civilians to be harmed. by the way we can actually hear what human rights watch had to say about this. the use of cluster munitions in areas with civilians makes an attack indiscriminate in violation of international humanitarian law and possibly a war crime. the cluster munitions that the united states is considering sending to ukraine are more than 20 years old. scatter over a wide area and have a notoriously high failure rate, meaning they could remain deadly for years. so as you can see, uh these are quite dangerous weapons and they don't just at the much of effective on the file seal against the military. you have any, your armored enemies there also have a potential terrible lagging effect on local civilian population. so of course, it will be american children who are injured by these in the post conflicts scenario or farmers plowing and feel the ukrainians and potentially russians. but also this comes in the context if you will call the sending of depleted uranium. so

it seems just alucard attitude to these weapons is very much in evidence here that as well, america could condemn the use which they did. there are $0.04 illegal, cluster bombs and vacuum bombs being used by the russian. if that's true, what is the next step of this in ministration? is there a red line for how much violence will be tolerated against civilians in this manner? that's illegal to potentially more right. it is, it would be, i don't have any confirmation of that. we have seen the reports. if, if that were true, it would potentially be a war crime feel. but the also condemned their use sincere you and russian use them against terrorist. and we can actually have a look at that. now, initial open source reporting highlights the use of cluster bombs by russian forces in several populated areas including hama and edward's tax. using these uh, imprecise weapons, only continue to cause a necessary so you know, the russians have been indiscriminate. they've been reckless in syria.

they seem to have no difficulty dropping cluster munitions around we're civilians and. ready me, so as you can see, and you know, do as i say, not as i do from, from the united states. and it's important. remember, the united states has dropped thousands of tons of these new nations in their various military misadventures. going back as far as con, podium vs non. and these new nations are actually killing civilians still today after those conflicts, which ended decades ago. again, another game changer, this isn't going to have a definitive impact on the playing and, but we'll see that you, it's not going to happen. it's only going to really expand and expand the number of civilians and unfortunate accomplishments on the ukraine inside who would probably have to die before this conference slip just brought to it to an end. it also represents the reality that you find is know, been used as a very cynical to bar 3 for western weapon systems. most of the things that are

being dumped into your brain. as i mentioned, the view and this week have never been used on the modern battlefield before. other know, being used in a vague cynical way by the military industrial complex that to gauge their effective a successful. so a dangerous escalation, another red line pushed forward, and this inc for mental move towards more, more munitions, more, more of these policies. so we're gonna have to watch this space very carefully. and as the conflict drives on with more little munitions applied to key if by washington, a us defense department official state is it wildly humanitarian situation is something to worry about. a russian victory would be much worse for ukraine. i'm as concerned about the humanitarian circumstance as anybody. but the worst thing for civilians in ukraine is for russia to win the war. and so it's important that they don't when we discuss that, will this with a full mark, us army officer, scott bennett. he says the remnants of these costs, the ball must, will end up beyond you crate and ultimately be used as weapons of tara. is there

going to be a leasing these cluster bombs that will have not a one percent rate of, of, of, of a mishap. these are so old, they're going to have a 10 percent or 15 percent rate of lack of explosion. they are very lethal, but they were, they will explode later. and that's where the real danger comes in is i see these weapons purposely being deployed as mobile mines. they will take them apart, they will use the speakers and you will see them ending up in childhood playgrounds in ukraine. nothing is belong beyond in skis in human a. busy lunacy nothing, of course is beyond the un nato, and bite in this lunacy. but they will be taking this cluster bombs are part and they will to be deploying them to impact civilian lives. this is going to be unleashed beyond ukraine. so it is not just using them as cluster bombs,

it's using them is improvised explosive devices and weapons of terrorism. there's pathological delusion. there is narcissism beyond anything we've seen in a political regime and, and politicians in the military. i think they are losing their entire sense of identity and reality. these are not people that exercise traditional diplomatic language or self reflection or moderation. or how can we live in co existence together? the american government under divided administration and the it's f b i n, c i a in a t, f and department of defense have lost all real accountability to the people because no people know americans want this conflict and want this war. but they are being forced into it by these tyrants and you see the essence of purity coming out in their pathological mania. see to think that they can deploy the sort of weapons incomplete, hippe, hippe, ok, prosy and in come in,

in conflict to what they themselves have accused others of doing the china is imposing a defacto by and on impulse of japanese sea food as following the island nations decision to begin dumping water contaminated by the 2011 fukushima nuclear disaster straight into the sea and comes off the united nations atomic watched all ready to report, claiming the whole fund would be safe of the japanese side whitewash their discharge plan. nuclear polluted water is nuclear, polluted water, no matter what the japanese site says. they cannot package polluted water as normal water and they cannot truck. the consequences and responsibility is caused by forcibly discharging polluted water into the sea. spilled water can not be gathered up again and the bad consequences of the plan cannot be reversed. we urged a pathway to stop trying to show its responsibilities and honestly responsible, legitimate concerns of the international community. they must stop promoting the plan on discharging nuclear polluted water into the siegel and properly disposed of

nuclear polluted water in a scientific st. transparent and negotiated matter, china is bad on japanese. the food products comes while depends making final preparations to dump nuclear contaminated water into the sea. and will this issue has raised many concerns among chinese consumers over the quality and the safety of japanese food, the director general of the u. n's, atomic watch dog, a rough l rossi has related the release of the radio active water saying that the scientific work of the agents need shall be trusted. the agreements that we have uh, with the, with the coal and with the government of japan are permanent in the sense that as i said, the other day until the last girl and perhaps you to your wheels in terms of evaluating, assessing at the, at, we will be there, if we see a problem,

a deviation, we're really media, the race, the alarm, if i can say or talk to, to the government, talk to, to typical. i need to be for them to take the new society decisions. one has to test the scientific work of the uh, we are new 12, we do not take sites. we look at the science window, but the problem, and we have an assessment. and then we can, we can discuss is interesting that he mentions of a trust in the scientific world that it has been reported that some scientist behind this report has dealt with some disagreements and scores. when the director general was asked about this, he simply brushed it off and did not elaborate according to a global times research center survey over 80 percent of respondents in 11 countries in the asia pacific region say that the plan is simply irresponsible. 190 percent have express negative sentiments over the plan and 94 percent have said

that the move will have a negative effect on the whole world, not just the region itself. and it is very important also to note that some chinese sea food vendors are incomplete support of china is decisions. so is, is a chinese citizen food safety is definitely of the most important for me. i would products on purchase through legitimate channels and we only sell them with the permission of the government. we will not sell japanese products now or in the near future. and with this issue concerns the health of future generations about how does the c belongs to the whole world and all of humanity. the japanese release of new fluid contaminated water into the secret costs are versus the pollution i won't choose to jump in is true in the near future. and it's not just the chinese citizens that are worried because the plan has been controversial since it's announcement in 2021. we've even local japanese people also expressing concerns over the contamination of the water, japanese fishing, and the food groups have also voice their concerns about their livelihoods as the

fear that consumers would rather avoid buying their products. and from japan, we go to south korea where the plan has also prompted some south korean retailers to stockpile sea salt, which has led to a search and prices in korea. and from korea, we go to the environmental group, green peas, who has long been critical of the plan itself. warranty and that the remaining radioactive materials can accumulate in the food chain and call in and said for continued long term storage. and japan has not yet specified the date to start the waste water release. but what we do know for sure is that it would take that case to complete the company as well. here we cannot exactly predict the effects we will see over the next 30 or 40 years, or even in a 100 years, even taking into account modern modeling techniques and modern computers. the earth is a very complex system. after all, and the world's oceans are

a large and almost completely unexplored part of it, any introduction of radioactive substances requires some kind of response from living organisms. we aren't going to speculate about the various limbs, fish might grow. we'll leave that to the imagination. but some kind of add up taishan must take place. maybe they will become more tolerant to this increased radiation or some species may disappear. but it should be understood that the i a experts have studied this question. and although some people may have suspicions about geo political motors at the moment, we have no reason not to trust the i e, a as an organization. there are representatives of various countries there and researches on going in terms of commercial fish. if they are exposed to this tritium isotope, that every batch will have to be checked. i emphasize every batch and not just once a year in additional monitoring of the fish and sea food cutting the region will have to become mandatory. the, the palestinian authority is quoting out of the us voted size is

a policy of annexed ation. and the pos side comes as washington is moving ahead with plans to build this new embassy in jerusalem on land. which according to the palestinians, was taken from them by force to do united states through its illegal decision to recognize jerusalem as a capital of an occupying power. and to build an embassy on private property and endowments lands, which was seized in 1948 from palestinian owners, among whose heirs are residents of jerusalem. and american citizens violates international law and supports policies of annexation and apartheid. instead of policies that serve adjust and less than piece, well the us officially move december say from tel aviv to jerusalem off the recognizing that there's the capital of israel in 2017. now it did cause controversy across the our world and was met with condemnation by a palestinian human rights organization, which are said that both the us on to israel quote,

directly and deliberately violate the obligations to international law. washington's and you embassy, you said to be built on line that according to palestinians was stolen from their ancestors. the status of jerusalem has long been a subject of dispute between israelis and palestinians. israel has held control over the entire city since the end of a 6 day war in 1967. however, palestinians consider east jerusalem a part of what they called occupied territory of israel. or is there any law or i should say has long erased the east and west divide? considered it a unified capital of the state will be heard from some palestinians living that have listened to what they have to say. the problem next to the american decision to move exam, because it contradicts american foreign policy, especially since more than the embassy and the to stay in solution. now, the biggest tragedies that they even move the embassy onto the listing and land owned by miller. this is even bigger contradiction from the embassy was already

built on palestinian land to the reproductive wasn't telling me it's still on pallets in the land because you know, opinions as our 1st napkins is really pushing derives of all of the support and international military financial more power from america to america is the tip of a single year in the struggle with those 2 years. and everything done by america with the airbus newton regimes have been for recruiting now in controlling their political decisions on which is always in favor of the occupying state. and all of the, the, the, the, the us is the one encouraging to occupied the break international loan and built their treat patients state. the national level of jerusalem isn't occupied city, according to international norm. you as a brags about democracy, the right of self determination. and international law and submit to this brief on this w, as in general to say about a student in one of the people that we spoke with alex label and also from jerusalem, who shared with us his family is the story of the line that is found to be the new side for the american embassy, a store that is sort of for overdue feeds,

and that, that conferences and g decision or whatever deeds or initiatives. what do i decided that i faxed them? what makes the issue this goes with our land? is that it was in the woods, you know, and bellman supposed $7.00, black church preferences are in about appropriate just to be able to move over and take an endowment catches sort of say, a test for me to go to decline this in the survey stuff the suspect was from the tradition. so i was, i think that maybe we can discuss because that flies and that's actually the of that better. see this is out jesus. that's actually good that i lies for this. is that say that it's, is this a, is make them over,

look the facts that are human rights and to properties, to live, to their own homes in the emerging multi polar world africa and india kind of cooperate to see both of their economies rise to gather the message from india is foreign minister and bossing on a full day visit of the east africa nation of tunzia as new w focuses on building tides with emerging economies of the global. so the approach to actually god today is to create more of a task like that to invest in africa, to work with us across to create capacities enough. so that the rise of africa also takes place as countries like india are rising. and they should be external affairs, minister of india is in the country of tens. and yes, we do know that those 2 countries have had, by natural ties and have

a long standing good relationship between the 2 countries. now the minister has had a long list of an agenda during his 4 day visits to the african states. and this includes the inspection of what's the supply project in pennsylvania as well as some of the, the details of tens are near will be meeting with them. and the staff exams, the boss, as well as a restriction that will be taking place on an indian naval ship that is currently in attends in year not the minister went on to speak a fox of the relations and the ties that to the country has with india as one of his projections in terms of what he sees, what people see would be the growing of africa and tense india as a whole. we are not as in extractive economy, we are not in the manner in which a lot of other countries are they have already model economic objectives for us. this is a broader deep partnership. do know that the relationship between india and tens in

mia is characterized by it's heavy infrastructure, investment, large scale projects, as well as a focus on a natural resources. and we also know that there's been a lot of training in terms of human development in the resources sick to as well as chancellor was in technology. now, in the as engagements in africa, the holding queue collaborations in industry such as pharmaceuticals to the communications and renewables and the ink to spence and as because of the software lines is a one that the searching fee of putting a full uh, fox news host tucker calls and it was given a key and a view off that he was fine by the broadcasting giant saying he wasn't actually surprised by the decision to drop him, considering how openly he's been expressing his opinion. but they were always very nice to me and they always let me see what it was. not one time did they tell me not to say anything. so i was always grateful to fox and i am in retrospect grateful to fox for that. so that never changed. up until the moment they called me

and said, you know, we're taking the show off the air and so i can only speculate, i know. but i do think as a general matter, not even about me to warn you. crane is a red line for, for a lot of people in business in politics and you see it in our politics in the us where the leaders of the republican party in the congress really are a pulse of, in my view, are now supporting some in cluster bombs to create well, this is tucker, charles is 1st major interview, and yet it he discussed as you just heard, that it appears the issue of the brain is a red line that it is simply not acceptable in mainstream media outlets in the united states. to question us policy with regards to dumping huge amounts of weapons and spending hundreds of millions of dollars on weapons being sent to kia. and that policy seems to be the unwritten, the rule by which careers rise and fall within the u. s. media outlets. now in the

interview, tucker carlson also stated that while in the past he's disagreed strongly with donald trump. he does admire the fact that donald trump seems to be the only major us politician who is speaking up with regards to ukraine and questioning biden's policy. you know, trump is the only person with stature and the republican party really, who's saying, wait a 2nd, you know, why are we supporting an english warn you? crane? and everyone in washington is wrong. everyone and trump is right on that question. and it's a big question. that war is re shaping the world, a 3 shaping economy of the world. the 3 shipping populations, the crate is losing the war. obviously the united states could and ukrainians are dying and huge numbers in the countries being destroyed. and so the us could force a piece like tonight, they could me a uniquely, they have that power and they won't. and they're continuing to that ukrainians to

be killed in the country to be devastated. the refugees in that region, the number of people killed in that war. i mean europe will never be the same because of this war. tucker carlson also say. busy about immigration policy and he touched on the january, the 6 events, the capital riot that happened as donald trump was leaving office, that he said that he spoke with capital police chief at the time, stevens son, who said that it was on dispute, that it was very clear that there were federal informants among the crowd helping the events to go down as they did now. it's important to know that there had been loss suits by the former employer at tucker carlson, fox news saying that he does not have the right to do interviews like this where to continue to produce episodes of his show on twitter. they argue that they own him under contract law and that you should be silenced, even though he's no longer appearing on box new. however, at the moment we see litigation continuing,

but tucker carlson continues to do interviews and do his show. as litigation goes on, fox is arguing, he doesn't have the right to continue doing interviews like this. so very interesting to see what tucker carlson had to say. this is the voice that was banned from mainstream airwaves in the united states to the skies over syria. now we're a russian fight to drive has intercepted yet another unmanned american repoed drawing is the 2nd day in a row of the us, apple. it's released the stipend, regarding the incident, claiming the russian pilots world fault and that they were being very, very naughty russian military aircraft engaged in unsafe and unprofessional behavior. thursday 9 30 am local time. well, interaction with us, m q 9, drones carrying out our d, isis mission and syria, russian aircraft drops layers in front of the drones and food dangerously close and entering the safety of all aircraft involved. so in this video release via the us

air force or rush or not su, 355 or a scene shadowing the reboot drawing before it engages off the bonus and release is a parachute flat, as the whole incident took place in serial solver and a space where russian forces are stationed are the direct requests of the syrian government. it was now back in march, a repo you, avery entered the russian space over the black sea and then crossed into the waters below after being sprayed. right. have a look at that. sprayed by fuel from a russian fight to jed. now most goes administrator defenses are paisley well, the us and its allies of the possible ramifications for crossing into controlled s . washington's incursions into syria and as far as go back to 2014, when the us north, as driving some cruise missiles on the country claiming damascus was using chemical weapons. a claim to this day that still has not been proven. many american lawmakers of cold, for the withdrawal of us forces from syria. but those attendance as recently as

much, had been rejected by those who were holding true power in washington. and i discussed it with john list of steve us a who any he told us to the us statements about the drought instead of just simply political upticks was american troops, sincerely have no legitimate right to be in or above siri of this accusation, just for politics the by the americans for politic use, the americans gave it to syria illegally. the american military gave it to celia and work. it was the separate this, the kurdish separate this to create, to cause chaos in the, in syria, the american military who came and installed the scene and resources of oil gas. and we and our to for building the city and the people from it and making the city and the people to suffer the americans. they are, they are the number one cause of the worries you. yeah. and to see any crisis to

lead to last this long distortion had been finished locked time ago more but because the united states, they want to keep them, at least they are. they want to keep them at least intention. and that's why they are there. on the other hand, as you said, to the russians are in syria legally under the request below, legitimate syrian government. and that is the right of the shooting government under the international law, to have to ask each from any country. and that is belie, russia has met its database muslims in the pack, us thought i'd be sending a clear message to sweden. the upheld riley's to observe a sign into the day you stuff over the corral and the prime minister himself called for the demonstrations. his anger has grown across most of the country is following the boeing of a koran and stuff coating during the religious holiday last week. here we can see a hundreds of pack us on a most of them is marching towards the swedish embassy in his arm about hiring banners, condemning the desecration of the holy book and the money. the diplomatic ties with

sweden p 7 and even off of the sweetness, still hoping to join the lines bluffs of night. so you can notice every more about that right now, one line that these tells of that for you at your own leisure, our website is on the the executive. and i'm here to plan with you whatever you do. you do not watch my new

show. seriously. why watch something that's so different opinions that he won't get anywhere else. welcome to please do the have the state department c i a weapons, bankers, multi 1000000000 dollar corporations. choose your facts for you. go ahead, change and whatever you do. don't watch my show state main street because i'm probably going to make you comfortable. my show is called stretching time. but again, you probably don't wanna watch it because it might just change the way inside the flow and.