the, the way you bear with me, i think the i a e, a record is a trick. does it show some of the jets embassy to japan spoke a shame of both a plan from ven guaranteeing any scientific objectivity. so i cannot believe the objectivity of the i. e report on this issue, voicemail williams upon this is a matter of conscience and a responsibility for future generations, including our children and to sentence for the rest of their lives. i will be worried whenever i eat and i won't know it's all right for me to eat this. i think there will be a lot of follow up issues and that's why people are so angry. beating i more than 80 percent of the south korean suppose discharging the nuclear contaminated water from for be see man to the see the one sided data to each of the south korean government. and the ruling party in favor of japan is really hard to understand. that is why i'm here to protest with it. we were talking to a contributor called john. he gave us his view on this matter. the water is

a why don't they just bottle it? and they can market it under so you could see my blow, i make exclusive drinking water for the japanese politicians. i'm sure everyone will support that. but unfortunately, i think japan will proceed whizzer plan. you specially now they have the green lights, long international atomic energy agency. and now is it's one thing to make sure there's compliance to the standard is another thing to guarantee safety. you know, what basis do they have to say this is say perfectly safe to duty, especially that japan is releasing 1300000 metric tons of waste water into the ocean. and then we'll continue to do so whole 30 years. the rest of the world will just have to wait and see what effect of releasing these nuclear reactive water into the ocean for next 30 years and will bring. i mean, i mean, right now there's nothing to stop japan from doing so. you know, they've never effectively treating the ocean as a dumping box. a lot of the problem may not show up right away, but when they do,

you won't be too late. russia is a state home nuclear conglomerate. a rough awesome has shipped key components for a new power plant being built in northeastern china. and this one of the growing strategic partnership between the neighboring countries, the 1700 tons of equipment headed to china for the construction of power generating units at the nuclear facility. and we spoke with the plant expansion director. yeah . this to say regarding process how much we really appreciate our relations with russia, particularly this plant because these projects reflect the relations of our states . we have arrived and seen with our own eyes, how excellent the equipment was made. here. we have seen how well they have fulfilled the schedule for the project. i thanks so much for sharing your time with us here in moscow. com. telegram auto see and got have a of the old races. also yeah.

the up to date. so somebody can bill, this is a pond, it's the only certain outcome is that ukraine will not be invited to join the alliance any time. soon in the meantime, ukraine is asked to sacrifice its young man on a promise that will probably never be kent washington likes it now. the

. the hello and welcome to was a part russian military operation in ukraine of those 2 markets. first anniversary having dinner k, the millions of lives on both sides of the conflict, inter before and after. how well do the protagonist understand the child, their motives and goals and we've been damaged already inflicted? is any reconciliation even possible? well, to discuss it, i'm now enjoyed by geoffrey roberts, professor emeritus of history at the university college court. this is a robert's is great to talk to. thank you very much for your time. thank you for your invitation. as you pointed out in one of your articles at western media are

still awash with the theories and narratives. so what was on vladimir put his mind when he authorized this incursion into your brain? but according to you, the o, i miss one important factor. we just put into apocalyptic vision of a nuclear arm, few brain embedded in nato. what do you mean by that? and do you think that vision as apocalyptic as it may be? i have any grounding in reality it. what will it will it will i describe that the purchase decision to go to well with your crime as a decision to try the type of plan it prevents the right to prevent the continued build up of the nature ukrainian. ready is on russia's russian border. yeah. so he's basic perspective was that, that build up was on the media, retard french or russia in the meat or long. so what would actually represent the next essential french russian highs. view these arguments,

the set this by the time and again, since sense of all the guy was the roster, i have to type activities accrued i that right now because the big data problem will be the grades that are the situation. be western russia in the future. so that's, that, that's basically was a little but, but in the process leading up to the decision. um, if there's a particular monument, which i think might have to purchase calculations, the payment will because okay, so as over it will say, well there was a threat. we need to like we like it, we need to wait to prevent people. but obviously it was very risky, dangerous. i'm so tired, so such a huge defeated protein, somebody winters this particular moment, they thought they could the munich security conference that mid mid, mid february, with whence landscape makes a speech of the kind of friends that you cry with quiet new nuclear weapons. and this is actually the 1st uh no comment on in the west. impressive do not stations,

but the fact that the policy of oklahoma truly operation is supposed to be a uniform policy, a as in doors by old international organizations. now, professor roberts, you also argue that i believe that she was backed into the corner by the west and to recognize that fact that you know, he didn't have many great options, was not to endorse his perception or not to approve the war as a policy. but simply, i meant to this time with a meeting to the fact also requires some degree of analysis off of the western policy because pushing your nuclear armed adversary into the corner is hardly improved. and a wise, do you see any appetite for this kind of reflection in the west, especially given indeed disaster as uh, consequences both for your brain and to some extent for the european union flip

blah, blah. oh, i see. yeah. as you store it as a, an accommodation on the international test, i see my site, my function is to try to explain what, what's going on to, to explain people's motivations. right. and that's, that's what i'd be interested in relation to, to pushing on the russian decision to, to attack of you crying. now having said that, as, as you indicated, that doesn't mean the site that i accept pollutants russian. oh, and i agree with these calculations. i don't, i all right for the very beginning, i thought a post one. i continue to post. what does it need to do when we're having these discussions? we can travel or the full from the discussions that you see very clear view about what's going on. is it, well, yeah, what kinds clips long? actually just thousands of people to be killed wounded that ukraine has been a devastated. there is a, you know, a dog read all the risk, the names and torture it every single time,

thousands of ukrainian soldiers and russian soldiers died on, on the front. so we need to as far as i'm concerned, the war is i these all started, it needs to be go to the names tri city that says uh, search. so the soon as possible, you transferred me over to tech. can i, can i stop here, sir, for that? just a 2nd because i think this is a very important juncture because when, whenever i have these discussions about security and morality, they're always sort of, intertwined in a way that isn't very difficult to make sounds because i don't know a single human being who would say that war is a good thing. there is no one who approves a hor, i'm sure protection solved. doesn't improve a war. but why don't you come to matters of national security of morality and ethics and you know, they and they don't always play along with the, the printer over to of the, of the commander in chief and wasn't as also the moral duty of any commander in chief british commander issue from the american commander into the russian from

under each of our ukrainian one to defend the country. if they feel that as a central interest of being threatened is also tomorrow, duty of citizens to actually judge to political agents and their decisions and their consequences is tomorrow to take off outside observers like me to, to, to, to, to, to design my judgment is that that that decision was wrong. that other possibilities of we solve the problem is beauty. so i was still present drugs. i don't, i don't see that i reach the edge of the road too much again. so that's my ultimate is the purchase unit, continue to pursue the pos part of the policy. now, how is that the best thing i, i disagree with purchase decision to go to law? doesn't mean to say that i blind human autonomy for, well, i know i, i get it once as it is pretty slow with that decision. well, could you that would be no more and your boss. but all of us have responsibility to

the situations. what route put in uh no, i pulled the trigger out. what was the west that loyalty discount but by buddies night, so ukrainian military build up and brushed as bold as it was ukraine but but refusing expense meant to meet me make story against 5 since the well we've had, we've had the development of this competing top proxy will up between russia and west now who wrote before and that from put into apocalyptic perspective. going to war in ukraine uh, bad in the, in ukraine to stop this country from becoming another. nathan breach had, was not a difficult decision to make as you have the russians didn't make that decision in 2014. they didn't make that decision in 2020, and even in 2021. having a mazda is very sizable contingent on the border with your brain, put an engaged in the last round of diplomatic talks with his american counterpart . it was a violent which unfortunately,

left nothing. i assure that we should refuse, indeed apocalyptic. i would even say biblically apocalyptic visions, are you sure that it was nothing difficult decision for seem to me given every thank you, sad about the russians and the ukrainians being you know, essentially one people in his view. i makes not to difficult decision for him to make even what he believes situation. so it's the situation to be that that's what i was trying to uh to, to get to that a relation to that to that particular point. um but you're right, you mean you quoted what pollution didn't to didn't go to. ready or in 2014, actually issued from industry, strong and tremendous statesmanship. right. which was actually so disappointed when he did continued up the pulse of sites which i mean, i think that's true. the roberts to what i mean, diplomacy for the sake of diplomacy is the ruler 5. i mean,

ultimately the diplomacy should sir. uh, some practical goal. yeah. what else could he have done to uh, you know, make sure that the rushes concerns not only listen to but actually take in into account because, you know, it doesn't get higher the meeting with the american culture part of the machine saying essentially, well, you know, we will do what we will do i, i feet deep roughly. okay. so what we're talking about is the less than the response to the russian security proposal. so to step up twice for $21.00. yeah. yeah. i think actually that had been some progress in those negotiations. try, did you recall when punch in the, in the february i had a conversation with laboratory satellite remote wherever we owe it years with a different market mode. and the girl said no, this, that there's still hope we should still continue with these with this because yet we need to go through, i should trip. and i said that that perspective items that the policy was actually

achieving some results, right? not peoplesoft the some results. there was a possibility of more results in the future rather than i just talked to you and to minister of foreign minister. la ross for minnesota and roof is not responsible for the secures are 1st solo and a few 1000. and i received the, the security and briefings that president received. so, you know, a manual put is in a circle. many people with input ends in a circle were shocked and afraid of this action, as most of us here in russia, because it isn't consumables. for many russians still that we wouldn't be in war of, of our ukrainian neighbors. but at the same time, uh, you know, i, i bring back the, that's the question, what kind of a negotiated outcome would you welcome and do you think would, how to, uh, sort of turn the, the courses advance in some other more positive direction. yeah, i do. uh okay. we can, we can all have to just point back and forth. brett, uh i,

i would just like to put choose this actually. i think that i could see what he knows now about, well actually happens as a result. what position did they advertise, the consequences in the kind of one of these types of life? i think that he was, he wasn't comfortable. i think he was, he was decided that a lot prudent course of action would be to continue with the diplomacy, at least for least slightly lease for awhile. no, no, no, no. he says, i would say that is be very consistent and saying yes, he recognizes the consequences after she takes responsibility for it. i still think this eroticism by suspect that actually um yeah, i had a crystal at the end of february 2022. i don't think he would have been, he was taking decisions decision for but anyway he, he has to have this was looking question. i was not arguing retrospectively about what might happen whether diplomacy could have succeeded with his calculation. was

the correct one um a lot with the key issues. what happens next steps is how do we actually, how, how does this will come to an end to a secure piece? how do we repair relation between russia and the west, another company they live and those are actually very good questions. and you wrote the power to this operation who didn't have the reputation for being a realistic and pragmatic decision makers, perhaps to print magic so that the sum of keys uh, wasn't counterparts. and.