i miss you this case, you ask us to go to the german, danish and swedish authorities stubbornly did not present any intelligible reaction to our numerous requests and appeals. we have repeatedly drawing the attention of the security council. the fact that their entire reaction was reduced to routine replies with a refusal to call for 800 stream live ridiculous, and for a fresh pretext. they know totally ignore russia's requests, but also neglect the opinion of the un security council that demonstrates if an action of european states can be explained by only one thing, attempts to drag out time in order to cover up the traces of the true perpetrators of the crime, this is also eloquently evidenced by the apartment they quoted united information campaign into western media within the framework of which completely upset versions of what happened all being promoted you. while the security council meeting began with 2 journalists, jeff brodsky and bryce green presenting the facts about what went on with the nord

stream to pipeline, and how all the evidence and all roads seem to point to washington's involvement. now, when russian ambassador in a ben z, i talked to the floor of the un security council meeting, he pointed out that there seems to be a huge effort by the united states to change the conversation, to read direct to the conversation away from the facts of the case because it's pretty obvious that prior to the destruction of the north stream pipeline, the united states had threatened to carry out such action. and that kind of indicates that the united states probably is the perpetrator. here's what the russian ambassador had to say before the council dropped because you do you live with, how do you consider the repeated threats against the north stream from top us leadership, they voice this more than once. however, as soon as the inconvenient facts were revealed, the american center european allies begin to interfere in every possible way with the national investigation. they are much more profitable in this situation in

which western countries have complete freedom of action and impunity, and the framework of the so called rules based towards impose on the whole world, which has nothing to do with the international law. now it's also important to note that the representatives of sweden, denmark, and germany were not present for the meeting. they did not attend the un security council meeting. and in his remarks in bath during the bands and pointed out that even though it was on their territorial waters that this attack took place, the 3 countries seemed to be doing everything they can to prevent investigations from coming to a real conclusion about what happened. they're very afraid of what those results might show. so this is an interesting meeting of the un security council, russia presenting evidence and the united states and its allies simply dismissing it with broad statements and playing into anti russian hysteria. that's what we saw

at the un security council here today. the russian state duma has adopted a lawyer to establish the introduction of a digital verbal in russia. but the central bank of russia ponds the issue of this new car and see in addition to existing cash from traditional funding held in the bank. so it's a bit of a mucky subject, but i certainly got the chance to shed some light on it with all to contribute to present, you know, the different car and say it's not like just invented another, another full of currency. the very big difference where we is, how it is issued and how it is then the able to, you're able to transact with it. so for example, if we take uh, you know, your normal banking system, let's say you're sending roubles to india, for example. normally you would use a payment system, code swift. so that's what you would use to send money or whatever the well, that's a group of banks that got together and said this is how we should move money. and the problem is, russia has been removed from swift about from one bank rough eisenberg, but it also announced that they were drawing for the country next couple of months

. they've given they gave the russian government at little time notice to fix it. and this is really a solution, it's a new way in which to send roubles around the world, but also internally with the investor itself. i see i get it, i get it. so this is about kind of uh, getting around sanctions is getting around, being cut off from the swift system. mm hm. okay, so i get that. i get that. all right. but advantages, what about the monitors and benefits for people? yeah, this is really giving us the advantages we'll re is probably we're, we're hoping we don't know on specs that i think it is a reduction in fees. when you are using to, to send a digital video, you'll be using a block chain network. that's the same kind of network. so it's cryptic currencies . welcome, but this is not the crypt the current spaces be very clear. it is not a cryptic currency. it is a real real version of the ruble. it's built on the same technology, but it's not what we'd call the traditional kept the currency me doing that the transaction fees are less, but you don't have to pay any middle by. there's no middle not involved. it's from one will they to speak would encrypt that, which is like a bank accounts to another without wanting to meet or equal the corresponding bank,

which is usually what you use to transfer money into that see, but in russia, what so there's a tiny fee that's taking it to transfer between one by the isn't you arriving, then another bank that should disappear really with this new digital variable. mm. so a lot of people are talking about, um, i mean, i talked about it all the time here and i'll see you. there's a circle, d dollarization coalition. so many countries around the world and this processing, multi poto world or getting away from and the number one was out of college. he's out of the us dollars. is it possible that a bit of a digital rubel could be a part of this alternative to the green box? yeah, absolutely. i think so. where are you? you know, you brought that point out. we cover a lot on the program breaks. for example, we do know for a fact that there is a new steven committee that has been formed by brakes to look at a new car and see full that blog. now, at no rush, it has had to really come up with his id pretty quickly due to the current situation. but i think we could see this being a, a currency oboski dependencies that come together in some way, shape or form throughout the brakes. nations to make trade most most seamless. and

also exactly as you said, the challenge, the, the idea many of the us solar and getting rid of the ability for the united states to control the monetary system, the radio active water. well, china, so that if japan is so sure that the water contaminated by the fuqua's, she, my nuclear disaster is safe and it should go ahead and drink it. if some people think that contaminated fukushima water is drink apple and safe to swim, and then we suggest the japanese side make good use of that contaminated water for those people to drink and swim. and instead of making the international community nervous by discharging it into the c u a. previously the u ends, atomic energy agency gave its blessing to the japanese plan to dump the contaminated water into a very ocean. several nations and environment lists of oppose the decision, including officials from south korea. i you got jen? i would like to say that i a is conclusion regarding international safety standards

is limited to nuclear waste from normal nuclear power plants. now the nuclear waste from nuclear power plants that were next, it is be the closest how i am very concerned that director gross said in the media interview yesterday, that he would drink the contaminated water or swimming it. if mister grossi is assured that the focus she made contaminated water is safe enough, i would like to ask if he is willing to advise the government of japan, a water deprived country to use that water as drinking water more industrial or agricultural water. instead of discharging it into the sea level, south korea's leadership, however, expressed full support for the nuclear watchdog position. the agencies chief was made quite angry, demonstrated cc them right, that when he arrived in, sold off to visiting japan purchase, or say they're concerned about the risk. suppose to the nations people now and for future generations, including of course, the impact on the environment the we them with a, i think b,

i a report is a trick just to show some of the gmc for japan's focus stream of water plan from ven, guaranteeing any scientific objectivity. so i cannot believe the objectivity of the i a report on this issue, personnel williams, upon this matter of conscience and responsibility for future generations, including our children and descendants for the rest of their lives. i will be worried whenever i eat and i won't know it's all right for me to eat this. i think there will be a lot of follow up issues and that's why people are so angry. b, b, i more than 80 percent of the south korean. suppose discharging the nuclear contaminated water from for be see, man to the see the one sided data to each of the south korean government. and the ruling party in favor of japan is really hard to understand. that is why i'm here to protest. well, here we were talking to a contributor called john. he gave us his view on this matter. the water is a why don't they just bottle it and they can market it under the sushi mug. below i

make exclusive drinking water for the japanese politicians. i'm sure everyone will support that, but unfortunately, i think japan will proceed whizzer plan you specially now they have the green lights, long, international atomic energy agency. and now is it's one thing to make sure there's compliance to the standard is another thing to guarantee safety. you know, what basis do they have to say this is safe, perfectly safe to doing, especially that japan is releasing 1300000 metric tons of waste water into the ocean. and then we'll continue to do so whole 30 years. the rest of the world will just have to wait and see what effect of releasing these nuclear, the reactive water into the ocean for next 30 years and will bring any, any right now there's nothing to stop japan from doing so. you know, they've never effectively treating the ocean as a dumping box. a lot of the problem may not show up right away, but when they do,

you won't be too late. russia is a state home to nuclear conglomerate. a rough awesome has shipped key components for a new power plant being built in northeastern china. and this on the of the growing strategic partnership between the neighboring countries. the $1700.00 tons of equipment headed to china for the construction of power generating units at the nuclear facility. and we spoke with the plant expansion director. yeah. this to say regarding process how much we really appreciate our relations with russia, particularly this plant because these projects reflect the relations of our states . we have arrived and seen with our own eyes, how excellent the equipment was made. here. we have seen how well they have filled the schedule for the project. i, thanks so much for sharing your time with us here in moscow. com. telegram auto see and got have old of your life as the

today show summit in bill. this is a pond. it's the only certain outcome is that ukraine will not be invited to join the alliance any time soon. in the meantime, ukraine is asked to sacrifice this young man on a promise that will probably never be kept. washington likes it. the the

watching is why is that why in this control if i give but plenty of the store in this, they should have been a short order for now, i'm not going to say last week when i scan, when i am touch at your desktop session, that's just shiny or just a bunch of mine is when you sit on the set up on me. and then there is a, a growing attack about whether the dollar could soon be displaced by rival currency both as a reserved currency and central banks around the world. as well as the current to used in an overwhelming percentage of global trade. i'm sure i know he used on this edition of $360.00 view, we're going to look at one of the top rivals to the us dollar. and how this is

affecting the already to motors, relationship between united states and china. let's get started. the historically, the us dollar has been a strong currency and has been widely used in international trade in finance. however, in recent times, the power of the chinese you are also known as the ren min. b has been a growing steadily as china's economy has continued to expand and become more integrated with a global economy. a chinese government has taken steps to liberalize the you on and open up china's capital markets to, for an investors or foreign companies to assure you on denominated bonds and promoting the use of you on and cross border trade summit. the response of the world powers seems to produce the desired results and the chinese efforts have not been in bank. at the end of last month, china and brazil reached

a deal to trade in their own current streets, ditching the us and dollar as intermediary. china also has similar deals as brush up pakistan and several other countries. in february, the central bank of the rack announced the plans to allow trade with china to be settled directly in the u on currency for the 1st time to improve its access to foreign currency. those are defend the dollar, and say, rumors of its dest are greatly exaggerated. point out the greenback is an entrenched incumbent and widely trusted as a safe haven. but it's a confidence based on the past, give a false confidence regarding the us dollars future. joining me out to discuss the geopolitical and market analyst as well as the publisher of the gold goats and guns newsletter and a blog tom lou long ago. tom, thank you so much for joining me. thank you for having me. so i had to ask, is the dominance of the us dollar at risk, and who would we consider the major competitors to the us dollar currently as well?

it is, there are a lot of rest as you pointed down your opening. but at the same time, those risk in the near term are more mean than reality. right? uh, global the dollar sol settles, 90 percent of global trade. most funds are sold denominated and you know, buying a, the triple a rated. that's such like the, the, the, the, the, the us treasury and whatnot. there's a lot of money that wants to get out from underneath the dollar system. but it's going to take a long time for that to happen. and we're seeing all these steps being taken today . and they're laying the foundations for it, but it's not necessarily a thing that's, you know, going to change tomorrow. and this is, i think one of the they, the, the issues that we have, the kind of the big disconnects we have to rectify, in our, in our thinking here, a long term on the dollar, bare short term on the dollar bill. it all depends on what timeframe you're talking

about. well, and time is obviously very important. it all depends on current events and what is happening in, in the relationships between the various countries. but currently the u on seems to be the most popular currently being talked about to compete with a dollar from other countries. and why do you think this is? well, just because china has the most vibrant economy outside of the united states. right . and they have the balance sheet room at the people's bag of china to expand the currency and expand the use.