will continue things and then we may expect to the escalation of naperville because i don't see any sincere demand for peace in your vision. i don't, there's no piece of that. let me do some oversight. but that would be situation. and if you decide to keep up, this was in the interest of us, administrator the, you know, the people of ukraine at the forefront to fill the pockets of the us arguments companies. they want the ukranian people to die the west of during the war and ukraine for its own benefits that says the country proposes a 0 precondition these funds for the complex nature of the country is, is many lines from russia, china, as trips the idea expressed by russian foreign minister as gen summit in the concert, the

french a range and then all the parts of india, we do have a taking the lives of around 90 people in the region. the f b, i guess, grilled of unprecedented have lots of trust as he tested positive for us to district committee. you preside over the it hasn't the f, b, i's history. people trusted the f b, i more wind shape or whoever was running the place. the one you are and the reason is because you don't get straight answers. the thanks for joining us this thursday morning minus we just got to pretty all the latest news here not see from the russian thomas on the benefits of his military industrial complex. las the claim made by the rainy and supreme leader ali, how many following the nato summit in billing us to and lose and do you know, how is it what people of ukraine at the forefront to fill the pockets of the us

arguments companies. they want the ukranian people to die and continue to manufacture and sell weapons. it will supreme leader. it's a lot harmony match with a group of muslim clerics on wednesday. usually he brings up religious teachings in his meetings with seminary students. but this time he elaborated on the regional one worried developments to give examples on how the west hides behind the labels of liberalism and democracy. hopefully to achieve its go see highlighted passed examples of this western habits pointing to the example of a d i what you said for 2 years resulting in the exploitation of its resources and the power version of its people. he also referred to how france occupied l. jerry, casting doubts on the western power support for democracy, saying their claim is neither sincere nor real liter are further forwarded to the ukraine complex as a physical evidence showing that the west has not abandoned its colonialism and exports. the nation as cannon fodder to fill the pockets of the western arms

producers, the supreme leader said that the ukraine people must be killed only because the interest of western companies producing us. so in arms lies the pro long in the war and ukraine. facts before to say that the west is what do you get the ukraine war as and any time soon? so the, the one who we are went on to say that western powers are known after democracy. on the contrary, were you said they're 10100 percent opposed to a democracy that is not serving their interest when it comes to the crane warranted . one has time and again size to sit and talk and try to settle the dispute through diplomatic channels and without beach or feelings of the west. just today, secretary over was green party will st can on the more around them really still letter which she wrote to present have porton, or do you propose these plan between you, rains and russia? so all the knowledge of on says that the war will not benefit either side of the

conflict, and that the western honest producers will be the ultimate profit tiers. and the russia ukraine war irritates at some western defense officials with the complaints condemning they telephone says and say over to you have future membership, some setting that they've got 2 twin gomez. i think american people do deserve a degree of gratitude for um, uh, from us from the united states for, for their willingness to step up and, and from the rest of the world as well. whether you like you to know it's people. sometimes you're asking countries to develop their own stocks. you know, we're not amazon. i told them that last year when i drove 11 hours to be given a list of the following is the buns. because disappointment that ukraine hasn't got closer to obtaining nato membership, ukrainian leader responded to the u. k. defense minister of ben wallace, and the kid is grateful we won't have dyes, but maybe the minister wants something special. but it seems to me that we're

grateful to the people here since the minister of offense, lexi or the do offense, a wonderful relationship. so call him and thank him today, please see contributor rachel mazda and shows how the long anticipated summits has left the key of disappointed you. bringing presents libraries. zalinski showed up at nato's garden party and lithuania, looking like drive. he was firing off furious tweets, calling his native house weak, because he had already heard on route to the summit that they were going to be sending out a timeline for ukraine's needle membership. so he showed up all we really need to talk like crazy boyfriend who is going to campbell active and the guy who uses it and starts diagnosing you on the internet when you insist on taking it slow. he wanted an answer on exactly when they'd be ready. by the way, that's usually how you can tell us the most to lose when he likes the whiskey is and just can't play it cool. then something happens that change is wednesday soon.

most of most of the month we can state that the results of this summit are good, but we should receive an invitation that would be ideal. that sounds like what someone says after they flipped out to me now or else ultimatum failed. and now they're worried about being done. maybe it has something to do with reports in the western press. that members of the american delegation to the summit were quote, furious. suppose the winds keys treated a tax on nato. other alliance officials have already dropped, not so subtle hints that as much as the whiskey tries to call the shots like he's in charge of nato. in reality, he's really joel and constantly demanding to know from the adults where they are on the journey to membership. unless we ensure that ukraine, when this more under to be insured, that ukraine pervades. so some southern independence nation, there's no membership issue to be discussed. i also shouldn't think we shouldn't

lose sight of the fact that they are in a war with russia right now. there is a loser, so it's no, i just say at the present made clear there is a, there is an important reason for of nato right now, because it would instantly stay within simply i put the united states in a shooting war with russia. i. so with any potential a to membership for g as checked to be out of sight right now, talk has now turn to the security guarantees. the lithuanian president wants to take this to scatter bases around real much for that 1997 agreement that nato made with russia to not put permanent bases or nuclear weapons. a lot of the territory of the former soviet states that had just joined nato. so it looks like this is all turning out to be a very to v excuse for member countries to justify boosting their minimum of 2 percent and g d p agreed on back in 2006, even in practice after the decisions are made to transfer western to acts their

cash to the defense racket. there's hardly guarantee of accountability german leper tags used in ukraine that was announced back in the spring, was supposed to already be up and running in poland as of the end of may. but it isn't yet. and there now reports that poland was insisting on milking that particular task out and be paid a small fortune to the tunes of tens of thousands to repair each and every time. so it was the lease of the summit having secured the future, not for your premiums, not security for ukrainians either necessarily. but the facts or is that are really the big beneficiaries of the misery of the for any. and people want to discuss this more as cost live now to generalist on odds of is thomas's father, who is in rome, told us quite so give us good morning to you a. hi peter. thanks for having me. thank you. not successful. i just want to get

your thoughts on the out. believe it was kind of both a yes or no to you. great. and yes, you are closer than ever before to joining nato. but no, it's still not that i think it was a completely foretold conclusion. everyone knew that ukraine would not have been often uh, full nato membership. i think ukraine itself understood it. so i think this was a little bit of cost playing on all sides. um i, you know, i don't things and skills. so need as to think that he really would have been offered natal manville. yes. when everyone you know from bite and down had made it pretty clear that so long as of what was going on. that was not that was not going to happen. so, um, i think it says, you know, it's quite a tragic outcome. uh, though not for the reasons does it ask is as not because nato is not. uh, you know, awfully membership to ukraine offering more as he said. but rather, i would say for the exact opposite reason, because the only scenario that nato can conceive for ukraine is more

war. uh, you know, the current situation works just fine for nato and its the fact solita, i, you, washington. uh, that is a situation where the ukrainians keep fighting this proxy war on americas behalf. um, so you is the brands that are seeing that you know that the country and that livelihood is destroyed um and on a very small cost full america. um, which in fact is benefit in this benefit in economically, as you've mentioned, its almost manufacturers and making rapid profits. it's benefiting jill politically . of course, it's just as cheap the one of its long time strategic aims, which, i mean, it has always been to drive a wedge between western europe and russia. set objectives. uh okay. okay. well, i apologize for insurance and it's almost, i'm sorry. yeah, we, we, we don't have suicide. i just wanted to it's, it's a bit your brains on something else. obviously it's, you know, you say it's don't cover a $11516000000000.00 in aid on

a person soleski. it seems to books some of his colleagues in the left, the jake sullivan, and ben wallace, the u. k. defense minister for the support that has been given ukraine in this war . uh, what do you make of the situation, those, those tensions, the well, i mean, 1st of all, i can ukraine's is have you parents have nothing to be um, you know, with regards to the west uh, the west has contributed to the disaster in ukraine. uh, you know, the, uh, the, the on did that, did that describe that the victory, the ukraine in victoria at all costs strategy has been absolutely disastrous. and so, you know, the west has not been given weapons. ukraine out of generosity and sort of dowdy, has to be, you know, as we said already, but it's been giving these weapons because it is, it solves its own, its own interests. but of course, you know, tensions ability, you know,

growing factions even within western uh, establishments that i think are starting to think in terms of an off ramp. uh that you know, that realizing the doors not um is not going the way that we're hoping for. clearly the out of the much wanted counter offensive has been, has been a big failure. and so i think it was again, this is just a bit of cost playing. but i think there are factions within the west of establishment that, uh, you know, starting to wonder whether, you know, how long this war can, can, can go on for. and so, you know, i think that this will then be proposed supposed to be what the results of the accounts are offensive that clear it in between weeks and months as well. yes. i mean, they, you know, that's, that's the argument. you know, the argument is yes, we are we, we happy? sure. in the only ones ukraine has secured a strategic advantage on the terrain. but the strategic advantage, you know, is, you know, always fails to materialize. and so i think um, but you know, this,

you know, once, once you get another, you know, discount or offensive not using the old indoors also hoping for. i think the pressure for some form of diplomatic solution will, will be growing. and of course, you know, a major factor and all of this, you know, that the forthcoming elections in the us, i think that's, you know, that's clearly that to, you know, shift the balance very um, you know, that very, very forcefully. i think when it comes to when it comes to the war and so i think the way the establishment is kind of preparing a time be in the, in the event that the balance of power in washington shifts. but also the gentlest and acts of is thomas fuzzy on the outcome of that nature. somebody in billing us, thanks for joining us. it's been a pleasure. thank you. and they told, behaves like megalomaniacs and treats russia china relations as a threats with those at least to the where the roof is foreign minister on the

sidelines of the us, the on summit engine content of the natives, dolton l documents states interest oldenburg said that even there is a fred to nato. this only proves the urgency of our task, of con, 3 molding forms of colonialism and had gemini, ghost this. now, with all the correspondence of sauna boy co, hello again, ox on the russian. foreign minister certainly didn't. police punishes the well uh your carter is more than 10000 kilometers away from business, but the sort of deal is on the coast of the latest in the spending of capital r b. first, here in jakarta, 1st and foremost, because that's something that you can email to you. major partners off of being russia reach, at least from a geographical perspective, would be understandable because the restaurant east part of the north atlantic. but they also targeted china, which is worlds apart from where i need to. uh,

traditionally. uh, so it's uh sierra of implants, latest summit data summit then bill has mentioned uh china for 2 times and its communicate describing it ultimately as a threat to its uh, interest of a threat to its values. and that speaks of the fact that nato very rand itself not just to the east of europe, reaches the direct or the director of time is for the current facilities in your brain, but also to the east of the whole you ration, continent and taken aim of china and possibly draw some of the chinese neighbors and stacy on members into it's about parts to contain this uh, this country. now here is to say about the, the danger of such policy. i see it looks great. the united states and its allies,

are you trying hard to change? see, i'm a sense of security architecture in stoughton there. declared that security is not the regional, but a global task means their success is, is that the you were atlantic and the in the even region are indivisible. major mil dream for structures already planning to move to the region, including 2 countries that were invited to australia, new zealand to full japan, korea. japan, by the way, is already given a signal that it's not averse to the idea of hosting american nuclear weapons or according their own. this is a very serious and dangerous trend. administrative also said that uh, earlier in the day she had a series of meetings including a meeting with his uh, chinese call lake uh one e. they had on 5 ton of diplomacy and they directly does cost way. he does a, russia and china could use to counteract what they nato,

for expanding its policies, its influence, and possibly its infrastructure to this region. now, one of the ways of counteract seeing that pressure would be a strengthening of the so called a c on way. this is actually a, you know, assess, raising the geo political vernacular, ad ac on the way would be, it's very asian, a respectful measures way of solving everyday problems. now this is size for a phone. this for, it's in effectiveness, and i asked us again level of today about that coupon did unfair because of what has been done to address mundane issues that are the bread and butter of governmental work in a very non politicized manner. so they've been dealing with counter terrorism rad, with on to drive the issues with the tourism issues with education, to be boring,

and same issues. i actually benefits aside as, as a whole rather than politicizing. any particular concern which of western countries normally conduct their policies? and he believes that all the criticism of the recent criticism of ac on is primarily being driven by a western capital one to so just for them to draw a certain countries into their sphere of influence and use them as a babbling ground against trying not to smell, the chinese representative also commented on the issue of how international relations should be dealt with on various models and the differences and how the west of the east approach would have to say they come your china russia relationship is built on the basis of non alliance non confrontations and the non

targeting of any 3rd party, the reality on the military, political alliance model of the cold war. and has established a model of major country relations, which is fundamentally different from nato countries that put up small circles. so maybe a c on countries are indeed faced with a choice in, into these big power rivalry, or whether they want to proceed in the traditional a sound way. and i, it's just my personal opinion, but i think it's a good indication of where they're going to fall. or the members also want to be members of the brakes, including indonesia, which is the hosting b, a c on summit this year. and is a very influential uh country within this and trying neighborhoods. and the brakes, as we all know is also like us here. um is uh no need to fear in spaces of countries within bricks and within ac on subscribe to the principal of clocks,

shares or an indivisible security. i'm thus hopefully that will remain to be the case. have to wait since the opposite correspondence are some good coverage of the us in so many seem to come to thanks very much. was nato's china threatened narrative goes louder, so there's one west of media channels. dehumanizing rhetoric of the chinese with a guest on fox news making the x and chinese fights as a sneaking into the us us. but among the bar packs of mail is between 5 and 15, who are of military age. not coming with fish and engaging in chinese military rituals like drinking blood, wonderful making. the claim is now larger than gordon. stan, or writing a 2000 olds of china ads by 2011 for the foreign policy magazine in 2012. or he says, i have it right here. i admitted my prediction that the communist party would fall

by 2011. was wrong still, i've only off by one year, so he predicted then the cut off. so now we're in the year 2023, and the switches rhetoric around. now the state of china collapsing is claiming that chinese are coming to take over america. and so, and not in checking blood. so if, if people go to google search and they type in drinking, check it blood. miller res out is actually us. the top surgeries out is really likes it drinking snake blood and be heading chickens. wizard t us marine practice brain survival scale in island. as i told you, lead military around the world do as part of their junk go survival training and also as. busy to my team building exercise, i've gotten sure has the making these outrages claims since 2000 no one, you know, it has been to to, it's been 2 decades. yeah. and they keep telling you vice,

that even though china has a collapse yet because the orange and tells them what they want to hear, they want to hear that china is collapsing, they won't do it. the are the chinese people do? we're stuff like drinking live chicken blood and they want to hear that the us is actually the victim here as it back. i mean, while us is actually waiting more across the world another use, today's sparks flew as f b, i director christ already testified before the us house judiciary committee. republicans accused him a very responsibility for the public's distrust and his agency. you preside over the f. b i that has the lowest level of trust in the f, b, i's history. people trusted the f b i more who wouldn't share to whoever was running the place than when you are. and the reason is because you don't get straight answers. there was a lot of anticipation of the judiciary committee, hearing republicans said they were on the f. b i director re about abuse of power

in his agency. and it certainly was a grilling things got heated. i mean, talk of a recent court ruling that dealt with the issue of suppression of conservative speech. have you read the rulings, or as i've reviewed it with our office of general counsel, are you deeply disturbed by what they've told you about the rule? and if you haven't read it yourself, uh, obviously we're going to comply with the court's order of the court's preliminary injunction. we sent out guidance to the field in the headquarters about how to do that. we need assistance subject of ongoing litigation. and so i'll, i'll declined to comment further, let me tell you what the court concluded, because it, it shouldn't be the 1st thing you think about every morning and the last thing you think about at night, not on this information, broadly speaking, well, wait a minute, wait, a minute here, and i answered the questions you can in a minute. your star witness said in the litigation. elvis chant, who's in charge of this, so they do it on the basis of death. this information, we need to need a definition of what that is. our focus is on the line for hostile actors who

engage in covert efforts, familiarize our social media platforms, which is something that is not seriously and dispute always trans testified under oath in charge of this for you. you said 50 percent, you had a 50 percent success rate and having a ledge election this information taken down or censored that that wasn't just for an adversary, sir. that was american citizens. how do you answer for the democrats did not press re as hard as the republicans did get heated when the president's son, known for his laptop, his cocaine habit, and his shady dealings came up in the conversation. things got interesting when republican mat gates brought up a 100 biden text message. i'm sitting here with my father. i will make certain the between the man sitting next to me and every person he knows in my ability to for ever hold a grudge that you will regret not following here. waiting for the call with my father. sounds like a shakedown, doesn't it? director? as i'm not going to get into companies we do,

you seem deeply and curious about adult, incurious. are you protecting the bibles? absolutely not. the f b i the said you won't answer the, that is why you won't answer it because to every, to the millions of people who will see this. they know it is and your inability to acknowledge that is deeply revealing about you. the issue on capital hill was the politicization of policing agencies and the f. b i, director christopher ray was taking questions alongside the you are right now. right out of the gate at the i director re started ran, standing against the january 6th capital riot. you said it was criminal and had no place in our democracy, but re refuse to acknowledge whether any of the informants were among the crowd. you're talking the question because you don't want to answer for the fact that you had at least one and somehow missed understanding that some of the

individuals were very dangerous and that there were others inciting individuals to enter the capital after others broke windows. but he insisted that the f b, i is not being, are you or your staff, or the zillow or aries, weapon, isaac, the f, b i against the american people? absolutely not. the f b i is notorious for it's interrogation skills, getting suspects to confess and break down in mit. wrong doing. but what we learned from the hearing that just took place is the feds themselves. don't hold other an caleb moffatt, archie, new york. and finally, full days of provincial rain in india has cost floating along slides in the nations northern states including the capital mines. people have reports that they lost their lives so far. all to india correspondents were just on things as most of the withdrawal con, essentially the mounting. these regions in the india have been the most effective,

the unpredictable of abnormal reasons. so to say him cause flash floods last lie the left still cities of destructions in the fall. so a few few days in the last 4 or 5 days it has the deals around the people. this is in the last 4 days alone ask for local authorities a but it's not interest structure worth millions of dollars. people live.