what is happening now, what happens is the positive is that there is a selective, a distribution. they distribute most of the different up all of the aid supplies to their own people up to the, the. so if you are pro fish, if you are a pro american, if you are pro nichols, unless i or any other islamic jihad this to do, then you will get to a fair share or even more than the student government to decide. okay, forget about us as student government. let's get to the it's sister lease, but i think sunset in the sense to supervise the distribution of a this does not go when with the unmet it goes, this does not go well with less than others who wants to distribute it. convoys to their own people, us without kept balance. while another trips to do is with scudding nail is right ahead. and then i'm back at the top with all the stories that joined me, then bikes for now the

. so what we've got to do is identify the threats that we have that be an arms race is on all sides. very dramatic. the only personally, i'm going to resist. i don't see how that strategy will be successful. very good. i think it was time time to sit down. jp morgan has agreed to pay $290000000.00 to settle a lawsuit from former client. jeffrey epstein, 6 trafficky sky. now he's in on this edition of 360 view, we're going to tell you the latest developer of corporate accountability. let's get started. finance or, and convicted sex offender,

jeffrey epstein might have been found dead in his jo center in new york on august over the demand for transparency and accountability of all his business dealings are still making headlines. the latest is also those corporation knowingly still offered services or partnerships with the i've seen empire even after his 6 trafficking business had been exposed to the public. i've seen had connections to many problem business type cans and celebrities and the large power of his connections is obvious as seeking the truth and justice has been extremely difficult for those. looking. the latest when from the truth seekers involved the one of the world's largest banks, jp morgan chase, and a settlement the bank is when the $290000000.00 awarded to the victims. what was all the claims that the 1st financial there's a sexual abuse? it's in a statement, a public statement, jp morgan said, and the association with epstein was

a mistake. and we regret it. lawyers for the victims of plan to stick up to 30 percent of the settlement amounts for legal fees. court records also represented as the victims and a similar $75000000.00. settlement with deutsche bank even more damning was the accusation of steve victim and jane don't. one was sexually abused by just daily a former private banking chief and su friend them, which is a dollar amount to finally get the victims justice and more importantly for tides with the various businesses and the future. well, to help us discuss political in as carla nixon. thank you so much for joining us on this latest development in the epstein saga. the just ultimately we just want the truth. we just want the names of those that were involved in that scene island and what they're still involved with. do you agree? i do, but i think we want the deeper truth. the reality is, if we go back to alex acosta to where this kind of really all started on the big

scale, what we find out is that this was connected to intelligence. the 1st thing that we got was out the cost is told to leave this guy alone, because he's owned by intelligence. and even when we look at the latest developments regarding jp morgan, we find that jamie diamonds are a long time connections go back to the same exact people who were sponsoring jeffrey epstein. so for jamie and for jamie diamond or for jp morgan to say that by happenstance, they stumbled into this wealthy guy. and they just happened to do business with him strictly because of you know, they wanted to make a profit is absurdly generational. ties going back for many, many decades between this same p, those who put jamie diamond and bower, and the people who maintain the epstein empire all connected to intelligence. there is no such thing as happenstance with anything tied, but that's to do right now. if you still believe it, i have

a bridge in brooklyn to save $5.00. so let's start with this settlement. were you surprised at jp morgan actually settled? and do you think the tournament 290000000 to mine? i think that jp morgan had no choice that if it had been 2900000000, they would have had to pay it because they cannot afford for losses to go forward with the potential for deeply into the relationship between the leaders of their country. jamie diamond clear connections to epstein just daily could not stand transparency. so they had to pay out whatever it costs. and if you look at the kind of money that jp morgan has, this has pennies on the dollar to them. so still it's one of those, it looks like a lot of the common man do you and i would be probably, you know, deaf jp morgan just to drop in the bucket. but what factory thinks the involvement of just daily played into this in this factor of jp morgan settling? do you think he positive go? no, i think he's probably a middle man. i think he may be a handle more than likely not just uh, jeffrey epstein is assigned to handler assigned liaison because clearly if you look

at the connections between there, these are not, this is not just the business connections. there's a lot more to it than this. so they had to have someone who was a handler and from the sounds of things from what we see just daily, has at least many queues of being involved in physical relationships with young girls or young people in some manner. and so it certainly appears that, you know, i use this word read assembly, but he got some benefits from this additionally, and keep this in mind. if in fact, this is what it appears to be some kind of a honeypot, intelligent scandal by giving just the only these benefits he's now caught in the web also, and he cannot afford to run his mouth. should he ever feel then the need to do that? that's why i also have to look at just daily being such a big power broker in the jp morgan world, where i have to wonder and i mean, escape going on one hand. by the other hand, there's other people that probably we're involved with testing that are also clients. jp morgan, do you think they're saying, you know what,

you're already going to take the fall. you already have a public guy shot this disclose is being one of those. and a little black box. absolutely. i mean when we look at the, the, the, the, the, the way that the court has worked with them that everything that we've seen to ensure that we don't get transparency when it comes to this case. this is just enough. if just daily and jamie and jamie diamond at the very top are connected, been, they're not the only ones that connected in. they're not the only ones in the know . and i think they were my opinion. it appears that in some way, shape or form jp, an intelligence operation, right. are we ever that want to get to intelligence after the break? because that's a whole nother based on that side of it. but do you think jp morgan, in this, if they would have gone to a full trial, would have had to disclose even more than they were going to be willing to. so any amount of money was gonna be worth it to them to shut this down. exactly. it could never go to a full truck, but discovery would be amazing. exactly. so they couldn't, they could, they couldn't possibly do it. it didn't matter what the number was. they couldn't

go to a few to a full trial because of the names that would have been involved would just be too high ranking to powerpoint. and of course, jp morgan is not just a bank, it's also an, a geo political power broker. and that would have eventually come into the come into account the as part of the discussion. well, there's been a lot of focus on the lawyers of these victims. they're going to get a large chunk of this. but the same time, it's not only about the money, it's also about the information that we actually probably had a chance of probably getting the most information yet. said these lawyers if they were about more than just the money to that's hard to think wires, not just about the money. are you kidding me? or what should they have held out? they said they did, you know, i know i went full discovery. i want those little black books, i want to know you're quiet rogers, who put money in who put money out. well, you know, from the perspective of the lawyers, they are sworn to represent their being that to their clients and get them the best possible deal they are. and if i'm representing the client and there's $200290000000.00 sitting around who's going to say no,

just half that $290000000.00. we want information? no, i mean, i think there was, i would be have to be to take that money before it goes. so yeah, just the money's worth it. and if i doesn't have that from the perspective of the attorneys and their duty to act on behalf of that, and that check when somebody to the house under any of this information. yeah. so because what we're talking about something different, a good right, well, and i think it to the next segment. what we're talking about is how important it is for, if, if this is an intelligence operation, the people of the country or are being represented by this intelligence operate has a do a duty to let them know 2 things that the lawyers deserve. kind of the push back that they're getting the blow back they're getting because they are getting such a large chunk of what they've invested in it. do you think that may be that they should be to start thinking 30 percent of this? this wasn't your issue. why are you not doing this more for the common good of finding out about what happened at epstein island? no, i don't think so. they just, they're under the money grubbing. you know, if you're a car mechanic and somebody's going to pay you

a $100.00 to change the transmission $1.00, they are doing a job as long as they acted on behalf of their clients. i will defend the lawyers because that's what their job that 30 percent was agreed on. if it was a $100.00, they got 30. if it's a $1000000000.00, they get $300000000.00. i. i don't think it is the job of the attorneys, particularly in this case, to clear things up for the citizens. something that our now congress has a duty here for oversight that they are clearly not. um not, you know, not standing up for well, that's an interesting one that once again that's gonna go security as well. i also have to order how did this change, how, how do you think we would have it different if jeffrey epstein was still alive today for whatever reason that you know that he went on with jp morgan still be fighting this if x thing was still there or is this because so we're looking for someone to give us the answers. well, you know, it's kind of hard to answer that question because the reality is the 2 things. the, the prophy, epstein,

or industry probably linked the reason jeffrey epstein can't possibly be alive right now is because of the contradictions that you and i are talking about. so then where does design maxwell play into all of this? i mean, she's the other person knows the information besides the bank accounts that people of that were involved with it. where do you think she rolls out in, in all of this? and why is it, jp, why are we not talking more about her and this settlement again because of the connections that she, i mean, if you, that she maxwell. if you look at her father who had a book called robert maxwell is really super spy. if you look at just letting maxwell, if she wasn't in, it tells you operations operative, she'd be the black sheep and the family jimmy, the only person who isn't because those because her siblings are her father. we're so again, we get into an unfortunate circumstance where we're talking about the citizens of the united states and possibly other right to know what their, that their government is up to. no good, particularly when it involves the sexual trafficking of, of, of what i see young women could be young men also, but we don't know. so we have seen the 2 banks. i wanna focus still on this

settlement. we said to bake settle. are you thinking there's going to be other other businesses, other corporations that are going to be held liable for their dealings with jeffrey? i've seen, do you think they're seeing this? i'm riding on the wall going. oh my gosh. are we next? uh well, i put it like this. i think you've got other institutions that are looking at their options for a way out that are planning with their attorney saying if it comes to us, how much do we have to pay? how do we get out of this? because i think we're looking in the same way that you look at a web of shell companies that people use to hide their funds for ill gotten gains. i think there's going to be a web of banks accounts and re route money through to justify the, the amount of money that epstein had when he really didn't work a day in his life. well, but that's the thing. we're talking about banks. yeah. there's other things, water people, there's the water utilities, there's all sorts of folks who service that island that and had to know something. busy is going on prove that they continue to offer services knowing that something

wasn't right about that either or they can do to offer any services, even grocery delivery to jeffrey outstanding after his 1st couple of convictions. well here's what's very difficult. the um, the woman who started this case in the u. s. virgin islands, who was a, uh, a government employee or whatever the case may be to work in the us virgin islands government. 3 days after she started it, she was fired, she lost her job. so it is very difficult to do this when the president is said, if you go after these people, you're going to have some significant problems and in your life. so yes, you know, when people feel like look, i'm going to get paid to do a job. but if i run my mouth too much or is too many questions, med things are gonna happen to me. people tend to keep their mouth shut and fix the electricity and leave and don't ask any questions. and there's a bonus in it for you. that's the way the world works. wow. tell us all this time except now we're getting it in a literally a live motion at actually live action as we get it growing. thank you so much for joining a stick around it. because when we return after the break, we're going to continue this conversation and look at it this can we mean

a new era of accountability? invest the march, the 112011. the largest squeak ever recorded in japan is where interested. a 14 me to to nami devastates the focus fema each and you have pallets on the nuclear reactors are flooded. sparking id to be of any time in june is living in japan. and this nice to go to the area of the nuclear meltdown in progress. shima immediately drove me to talk to somebody about the gym

for ya. investigation stats. watch on tv, the the, the welcome back. i'm sky now. he's and you're watching the 360 view we're discussing the largest settlement yet for vick. this

could finally give us insight into his quiet list typical and was currently nixon and joined us to continue this conversation. okay, let's start for gifts curious, talk about the business side. do you think this settlement will influence the business community and their policies moving forward? other banks will think twice before interacting with people who have been convicted . i don't know of a sex crime. yeah, i do think i do think that they will be concerned. i think that the people involved felt that they were protest. acosta said, hey, this is a bit protected by intelligence. so i think that people felt that they were protected. if you get involved with seems to obtain a rate and the government's involved. don't worry about it. you're going to walk. i think now when some of these more powerful corporations are approached by intelligence, instead, we're going to do this, that insertions, they're going to be, they're going to be looking out for themselves a little bit more stringently concerned that something could come out in the long run regardless of whatever promises they get the call and here's what i find to be curious. we have seen bank start stop doing business with customers over ties with

russia or stop doing banks based on political opinions. and even during co that it was businesses that were staying open and not taking the vaccine. we've seen businesses in the past stopped doing for one reason. political reason. first is another, a social reason. why did it take a settlement like this in a, an idea of sex tracking, which is clear wrong? why is it taking this to get their realization when they've done it for other reasons? well, i hate to sound redundant, but because they felt they were for it, they were protected. there's a difference between someone who acts and believes that there's some level of um, you know, they could be held accountable in some way as opposed to those who have very powerful people saying, don't worry, we got you covered. and i think that's what we're looking at here. we're looking at banks, let's not forget when we look at these, but a banks, when you look at a h. s, v. c on and or you find connections to drug cartels. you find that. so i forget

a those are still loud. why are we solving wire? they stop, hsbc got caught a laundering money for drug cartels. they went out and hired jim coney brought him on the board to clean it right up and off they go. so they know a lot of times they can buy their way out of this by high, you know, just bringing in. so like high powered the neo liberal actors on board. we're talking about the separation of church and state and the west all the time. maybe we need separation of the banks and government, but we both know that would be unrealistic. unfortunately, government do feel though, if we do start seeing the standard, are we asking for trouble for down the road for possible allowance of discrimination interact with him and not with other depending on how popular how strong those ties are with government as well. but unfortunately now i, you know, i understand where you're going, but i think it's too late for that. if you look at what happened during the during cope, it's such as in canada where the government said the banks. oh well you donated a few $1.24 people literally donated $25.00 to the truckers had their accounts shut

down. so we saw our will arbitrarily and capriciously use their power against the least of us, but the most powerful for the most part, feel as though that they can act with impunity. and most of the time they do. this is one of the rare instances where, you know, some, some sunlight actually hit what was going on and people like you and i get to discuss it. and, but unfortunately it is just you and i, this is a bigger picture of this because like you said, this goes back to security. so let's talk about jeffrey. i've seen this security. what country do you think benefited most and what your social security, what exact actions do you think jeffrey, i've seen what service was he providing to those in the intelligence agencies? in my opinion, and this is speculation, right? cuz like i said, it's hard to get this wasted firm. we do know that there were a lot of cameras involved. we do know that there were a lot of very high ranking, powerful people involved. it appears to me that this was kind of the classic honeypot that basically they would bring people in,

they would get compromising video and or pictures and information regarding people that they had no business being there with. and then ultimately they could influence their decisions at a later date. i would say that an operation of this magnitude was more than one country since it was in the united states. and since it, admittedly, a part of the trump administration said as intelligence in the united states, clearly the, the us intelligence was involved. so you just ask, have to ask yourself, who, who would work with him? certainly the 5 eyes you would have to success. this is basically, this is really intelligence, the 5 eyes, the people that they work with on the data. we're here getting the information they needed for their nefarious activities. why is there not? and i get it you're, you're literally asking the kid to investigate the cookie jar thief. why are we not seeing large cries by politicians on both sides of the as because i will bit, i bet, probably 6070 percent of those like an office right now in congress had nothing to do with jeffrey. i've seen in any way. but why aren't they calling on both sides

out for congressional investigations into ties or are you concerned? my fear would be is because they know this is still a program being run in other ways. not. not he that yes, definitely. that they understand the dynamics of power in washington dc and let's face it. what happened is, jeffrey epstein, you know, who wants to get people don't know literally. jeffrey epstein was put in a cell with a man named nicholas tart, hardly only who was recently convicted for murdering for people when he so they tell us we're going to look out for jeffrey epstein. we have to take care of and make sure nothing happens. and they put them in a cell with a guy who's basically a mafia. gorilla school, literally to strangle this guy did that. the guy just happen to have 4 people with an unrelated, so we kill, excuse me, 3 people. so we killed the other 3 just because they were there, they put epstein in the cell with this guy and he committed suicide. so in viewing

that particular scenario, if you're i, where i ask what we knew about jeffrey epstein, based on what we learned, we'd probably, regardless of what we knew, it would probably come out. i don't know, nothing. right as well. yeah, we don't even go anything. that's a part of the problem with this, and it's not just the way, it's not just the american. what other intelligence agent does, a maxwell's father was given this huge stately funeral by the is really government . and he was not actually a member of here is apparently government, he's also a the why are these factors being the front pages of the new york times for get the government? where is the media and covering the story and putting these issues on the front page of every newspaper every day until they got their answer. well, all you have to do is read a couple of new york times stories, and you get to the 2nd or the 2nd paragraph and it says, anonymous intelligence officials tell us that fill in the blank turn on m s n d c. some of the above and they have intelligence officials, former retired, whatever intelligence official saying this and that. so there was an incestuous

relationship between the us and media if that's the right word to use and the intelligence agencies to a point where if there's told that's an area we're just going to leave alone sticks on stage, are literally intelligence operative. so certainly they would work with their comrades to continue and shop these types of activities. we talked about the america in the us intelligence, we talked about as really what other countries do you think i, we know, do we have in my 6 what other countries intelligence do you think would have had ties to jeffrey? i've seen him would find a beneficial to keep this client list off. well, since there was a member of the royal family who was intricately involved in this operation. and not saying what he was from the other end of it, and that he was accused prince andrew, shall we say he was at a minimum of twos to being involved with young girls. certainly i would say in my 6 would be involved. it would be, i don't know that they were, it would be reasonable to conclude that if in fact this is an intelligence agency knowing that wish it was a former, intel is rarely prime minister and that

a member of the royal family is allegedly involved. those are the 2 countries that i would look at 1st, but again, if you look at as an example, what happened with cross fire hurricane? we had most food from rome we had down or from uh, australia. so the 5 vises uh, you know, i think is one intelligence agency at this point. okay, so then going forward from this thing we, we had a problem with trust the media, we have problem with trust. the government shouldn't both of the as the working to prevent sex trafficking rings. now we're looking at private business being held accountable for it. is this a positive step? do you believe and accountability, at least for business? and will we ever see that happen for government and the truth perhaps? how strong the government was tied to epstein? i would say no, it's not the positive for this reason because what we're getting is a shell game. what we're getting is, oh, we caught the people that did it, and this was just some bad people doing bad things. so the accountability would be to trace this back to the intelligence agencies and find out who was behind this

and what it was, which they can't do. so you can address an issue if you can hold the people who are and we can, we can have the mask of who was involved, then we can go after just daily. we can go after bill gates, whoever people who were involved in on, on the periphery buttons up at masters are going to walk. and so therefore, i don't, i don't see this is a positive development for accountability. you would have thought $290000000.00 to be a wake up call. but i guess when you're as big as jp morgan and you realize you still have a lot more to lose, you keep your mouth shut. thank you so much for doing is currently on this issue and will continue to fall. we will keep this in the headlight when everybody else isn't. i am sky now. here's, and this has been your 360 view of the news affecting you say show us the

crane does exist, should exist. and it is precisely the best option, i suspect, for its future use of the cultures that are within it and turn it into something unique and flourishing. that that would finance and distinction, but not conflict but, but simply the difference between itself and its neighbors. the, [000:00:00;00] the

year usually specials, cheap. so i'm not sure if i give that to just the most of it is so cool. yeah. so but also wondering about okay, as a joke. oh, my god of those go up, go shooting and usually it's jim or something for most of which just of most of the people some of the but they would some of the him put the trust in some ways to grab a couple of them from national origins, if i need not shut off and i need to look at that. and i told me to jump to a new session and does not know much seeing much to the the

what happened is there she, this crime is senseless. there will be a response from russia and allow them to put involved in military response to the creating that to come the cry me a bridge funding. it's not good for the incident left. the mother and father dead under no portion door opportunity knocks around, offers india quote, special try, all right, see when it comes to oral exports of the 2 countries, 6 upholstered ties, despite width and pressure, the lick quality. and that's the best word, penny as president, and save that for financial system. of course, the confidence, the only way for it to post without asking for one financial system that the 3 of us us know, we are asking for financial system that dates fast for the

mid day and most go this tuesday. i'm going to need with your global use run up here on our t international. russian forces. ripple takes huge ukrainian drone attack on cry. mia? earlier on tuesday interest something 28 of them. that's according to the defense ministry. it comes a day after another. you printing that to kit the crime me in bridge damaging the crossing and killing 2 people. the russian president called bob incident, a senseless act of terrorism. and the most to book this one. i cheated with another terraced act was committed on the bridge. civilians were killed, a child was injured and left without parents. the family had left to go to crimea from the belgrade region. i asked to provide all the necessary assistance to the injured girl and her relatives to f. s. b. the investigative could have been instructed to investigate what happened is another terrorist attacked of the key of regime. this crime is senseless. from a military point of view,

it has no meaning that this is used for military transportation for a long time and cruel, because innocent civilians were injured and killed. of course, there will be a response from rush harry and a corresponding proposal to the as well. just some details on the rushes of the terrorist committee said to you printing unable to drones, damage the bridge in the early hours of monday. now the route is a key gateway from the russian midland to the peninsula. the attack of the russian leader say, teenage daughter on happens on the family's 1st holiday trip to crimea. russian investigators have opened a criminal, proven to be attack, can say, early findings point the finger squarely at authority. se works already underway and repairing the bridge and reopening it fully to traffic global affairs and security. busy as well as mark slip both to leave such incidents are you printing