that's my opinion, it appears that in some way, shape or form, jp morgan was helping to support unintelligence operation. are we ever that want to get to intelligence after the break? because it's a whole nother based on that side of it. but do you think jp morgan, in this, if they would have gone to a full trial, would have had to disclose even more than they were going to be willing to. so any amount of money was going to be worth it to them to shut this down. exactly. it could never go to a full truck, but discovery would be amazed that exactly. so they could, they could, they couldn't possibly do it. it didn't matter what the number was, they couldn't go to a few to a full trial because of the names that would have been involved would just be too high ranking to powerpoint. and of course, jp morgan is not just a bank, it's also an, a geo political power broker. and that would eventually come into the come into account the as part of the discussion. well, there's been a lot of focus on the lawyers of these victims. they're going to get a large chunk of this, but the same time, it's not only about the money,

it's also about the information that we actually probably had a chance of probably getting the most information yet. should these lawyers, if they were about more than just the money to that's hard to think wires, not just about the money. are you kidding me? or what should they have held out? they should they should, you know, i know i went full discovery. i want those little black books, i want to know you're quiet rogers, who put money in who put money out. well, you know, from the perspective of the lawyers, they are sworn to represent that to their clients and get them the best possible deal they are. and if i'm representing the client and there's 2cw2c9xw dollars sitting around who's going to say no, just past that 290000000 that we want information? no, i mean, i think the responsibility of the lawyers of their job would be have to be to take that money before it goes. so yeah, just say the money's worth it doesn't have that from the perspective of the attorneys and their duty to act on behalf of their clients. they have you gotta sign that check with somebody at the house under any of this information. yeah. so, cuz what we're talking about something different, a good right?

well, and i think it to the next segment. what we're talking about is how important it is for if, if this is an intelligence operation, the people of the once read or being represented by this intelligence operation have a right to know. and the government has a did a duty to let them know. 2 things that the law. busy of yours deserves kind of the push back that they're getting the blow back. they're getting because they are getting such a large chunk of what they've invested in it. do you think that may be that they should be deserving because they're getting demonize and saying, why are you taking 30 percent of this? this wasn't your issue. why are you not doing this more for the common good of finding out about what happened at epstein island? no, i don't think so. they deserve the money grubbing. you know, if you're a car mechanic and somebody's gonna pay you a $100.00 to change the transmission once the transmission has changed, if you're a $100.00, they are doing a job, as long as they acted on behalf of their clients. i will defend the lawyers because that's what their job that 30 percent was agreed on. if it was a $100.00, they got 30. if it's a $1000000000.00, they get $300000000.00. i. i don't think it is the job of the attorneys,

particularly in this case, to clear things up for the citizens. something that our now congress has a duty here for oversight that they are clearly not. um not, you know, not standing up for well that's an interesting one then once again, that's gonna go security as well. i also have to order. how did this change, how, how do you think we would have it different if jeffrey, i've seen, was still alive today for whatever reason that you know that he went on with jp morgan still be fighting this f. c was still there. is this because this actually because that's the same past and so we're looking for someone to give us the answers. well, you know, it's kind of hard to answer that question because the reality is, the 2 things, the, the problems that we have now and the death of jeffrey epstein or industry probably linked the reason jeffrey epstein can't possibly be alive right now is because of the contradictions that you and i are talking about. so then where does this line maxwell play into all of this? i mean, she's the other person knows the information besides the bank accounts that people

of that were involved with it. where do you think she rolls out in, in all of this? and why is it jp, are we not talking more about her this settlement again because of the connections that she have. mean if you that she has to intelligence. if you look at just plain maxwell, if you look at her father who had a book called, robert maxwell is really super spy. if you look at just waiting maxwell, if she wasn't in intelligence operations operative, she'd be the black sheep and the family jimmy. the only person who is it because those because her siblings are her father. we're. so again, we get into an unfortunate circumstance where we're talking about the citizens of the united states and possibly other countries that will go a name that have a right to know what their, that their government is up to. no good, particularly when it involves the sexual trafficking of, of, of what i see young women could be young men also, but we don't know. so we have seen the 2 banks. i wanna focus still on this settlement. we see the 2 big settle. are you thinking there's gonna be other other businesses, other corporations that are going to be held liable for their dealings with jeffrey?

i've seen, do you think they're seeing this already on the wall and going oh my gosh, are we next? uh well, i put it like this. i think you've got other institutions that are looking at their options for a way out that are planning with their attorney saying if it comes to us, how much do we have to pay? how do we get out of this? because i think we're looking in the same way that you look at a web of shell companies that people use to hide their funds for ill gotten gains. i think there's going to be a web of banks that are used to re route accounts and re route money through to justify the, the amount of money that epstein had when he really didn't work a day in his life. well, but that's the thing we're talking about banks. yeah. there's other things there's, there's electric providers, there's the water people, there's the water utilities. there's all sorts of folks who service that island that and had to know something. busy is going on as a lawyer or is it hard to prove that they continue to offer services knowing that something wasn't right about that either or they can do to offer any services,

even grocery delivery to jeffrey, i've sitting after his 1st couple of convictions. well here's what's very difficult, the um, the woman who started this case in the us version. and so it was a, a, a government employee or whatever the case may be, some work in the us virgin islands government. 3 days after she started it, she was fired, she lost her job. so it is very difficult to do this when the president is said, if you go after these people, you're going to have some significant problems and in your life. so yes, you know, when people feel like look, i'm going to get paid to do a job. but if i run my mouth too much or ask too many questions, bad things are going to happen to me. people tend to keep their mouth shut. hey, go turn on some water or fix the electricity and leave and don't ask any questions . and there's a bonus in it for you. that's the way the world works. wow. tell us all this time except now we're getting it in a literally a live motion at action live action as we get growing. thank you so much for joining us. stick around just because when we return after the break, we're going to continue this conversation and look at it. this. can we mean a new era of accountability? invest?

the 1834 prance invaded algeria and straight away the french started inhabiting it to strengthen their position. the column is known as the new ours, the best land. from day one, the local population was put into an unequal position and was briefly exploited. this caused them as discontent. the people of l g area began their long term fight for independence. in 1954, the banner of freedom was raised by the national liberation front. a guerrilla war

against the occupants broke out. the french tried to suppress, to rebuild you and using cruel measures. whole villages were wiped now, acts of torture and executions of civil people, including pregnant women, children and old people took place more than 2000000 people were born into concentration camps. however, these punitive measures didn't help. cl, jerry and patriots managed to induce france to start seize negotiations in 1962 heavy and the cords were assigned 14 l. jerry on the bass boards independence. but this was achieved at a colossal price. algeria by rights is considered to be a country of martyrs. according to the calculations of historians, the french colonists are responsible for the debts of one and a half 1000000 algerians. the

welcome back. i'm sky now. he's in, you're watching the 360 view. we're discussing the largest settlement yet for victims of jeffrey epstein. and if this could finally give us insight into his quiet list total and was currently nixon joins us to continue this conversation. okay, let's start before it gets through. sorry about the business side. do you think this settlement will influence the business community and their policies moving forward? other banks will think twice before interacting with people who have been convicted . i don't know of a sex crime. yeah, i do think i do think that they will be concerned. i think that the people involved felt that they were protected in the same way that alex will cost a cost to said hey, this is

a bit protected by intelligence. so i think that people felt that they were protected. if you get involved with some ship tannery and the government's involved, don't worry about it, you're going to walk. i think now when some of these more powerful corporations are approached by intelligence. instead, we're going to do this, that or the other. they're going to have more concerns. they're going to be uh, they're going to be looking out for themselves a little bit more on stringently concerned that something could come out in the long run, regardless of whatever promises they get, the kind of shares what i find to be curious, we have seen bank start stop doing business with customers over ties with russia or stop doing banks based on political opinions. and even during told that it was businesses that were staying open and not taking the vaccine, we've seen businesses in the past stopped doing for one reason. political reason. first is another, a social reason. why did it take a settlement like this in a, an idea of sex trafficking which is clear wrong? why is it taking this to get their realization when they've done it for other

reasons? well, i hate to sound redundant, but because they felt they were put to they were protected. there's a difference between someone who acts and believes that there is some level of um, you know, that could be held accountable in some way as opposed to those who have very powerful people saying, don't worry, we got you covered. and i think that's what we're looking at here. we're looking at banks, let's not forget when we look at these, but a banks, when you look at a h. s, v. c on an or you find connections to drug cartels. you find that. so i forget a those are still loud. why are we solving wire? they stop, hsbc got caught a laundering money for drug cartels. they went out in higher gym call need and brought him on. the board, cleaned it right up and off. they go. so they know a lot of times they can buy their way out of this by high, you know, just bringing in. so like high powered the neo liberal actors on board. we're talking about the separation of church and state and the west all the time. maybe we need separation of the banks and government, but we both know that would be uh,

unrealistic. unfortunately, government do feel though, if we do start seeing the standard, are we asking for trouble for down the road for possible allowance of discrimination by certain business? by encouraging business to interact with him and not with other depending on how popular, how strong those ties are with government as well. but unfortunately now i, you know, i understand where you're going, but i think it's too late for that. if you look at what happened during the during cope, it's such as in canada where the government said to banks, oh well, you donated a few $1.24 people literally donated $25.00 to the truckers had their accounts shut down. so we see that the people in power will arbitrarily and capriciously use their power against the least of us. but the most powerful for the most part, feel as though that they can act with impunity. and most of the time they do this is one of the rare instances where, you know, some, some sunlight actually hit what was going on. and people like you and i get to

discuss it. and, but unfortunately it is just you and i, this is a bigger picture of this because like you said, this goes back to security. so let's talk about jeffrey. i've seen this security. what country do you think benefited most? and what is your security? what exact actions do you think jeffrey, i've seen what service was he providing to those in the intelligence agencies? in my opinion, and this is speculation, right? cuz like i said, it's hard to get this one confirmed. we do know that there were a lot of cameras involved. we do know that there were a lot of very high ranking, powerful people involved. it appears to me that this was kind of the classic honeypot that basically they would bring people in, they would get compromising video and or pictures and information regarding people that they had no business being there with. and then ultimately they could influence their decisions at a later date. i would say that an operation of this magnitude was more than one country since it was in the united states. and since it, admittedly, i'm a part of the trump administration said i was told by in the disguise intelligence

in the united states, clearly the, the us intelligence was involved. so you just ask, have to ask yourself, who, who would work with him? certainly the 5 eyes you would have to success. this is basically, this is really intelligence, the 5 eyes, the people that they worked with on a day to day basis. and all likelihood were here getting the information they needed for their various activities. why is there not? and i get it you're, you're literally asking the kid to investigate the cookie jar thief. why are we not seeing large cries by politicians on both sides of the as because i will bit i, but probably 6070 percent of those like an office right now in congress had nothing to do with jeffrey i've seen in any way. but why aren't they calling on both sides out for congressional investigations into ties of our intelligence? with jeffrey options, are you concerned? my fear would be is because they know this is still a program being run in other ways. not, not he that yes, definitely. that they understand the dynamics of power in washington dc, and let's face it. what happen to jeffrey epstein, you know,

who wants to get people they'll know, literally jeffrey epstein was put in a cell with a man named nicholas tart, hardly only who was recently convicted for murdering for people when he gets. so they tell us we're going to look out for jeffrey epstein. we have to take care of and make sure nothing happens. and they put them in a cell with a guy who's basically a mafia. gorilla school, literally, he strangled this guy. did that. the guy just happen to have 4 people with an unrelated, so we kill, excuse me, 3 people certainly killed the other 3 just because they were there. they put epstein in the cell with this guy and he committed suicide. so in viewing that particular scenario, if you're i, where i ask what we knew about jeffrey epstein, based on what we learned, we'd probably, regardless of what we knew, it would probably come out. i don't know, nothing. right as well. yeah. we don't even go anything. but as a part of the problem with this, and it's not just the way it's not just the american,

what other intelligence agency then you mentioned israel. and the fact that does a maxwell's father was given this huge stately funeral by the is really government . and he was not actually a member of, here's apparently government, i was actually so which is never which is on heard of before. why are these factors being the front pages of the new york times for that? the government, where is the media and covering the story and putting these issues on the front page of every newspaper every day until they got their answer. well, all you have to do is read a couple of new york times stories, and you get to the 2nd or the 2nd paragraph, and it says, anonymous intelligence officials tell us that fill in the blanks turned on m s. n d c. cnn for all of them, all of the above and they have intelligence officials, former retired, whatever intelligence official saying this and that. so there was an incestuous relationship between the us and media if that's the right word to use. and the intelligence agencies to a point where if there's told that's an area we're just going to leave alone, they're going to do it. and the people that they are putting on sticks on stage are

literally intelligence operative. so certainly they would work with their comrades to can, to ensure that we remain in the dark about these types of activities. we talked about the america in the us intelligence, the doctor has really what other countries do you think we know? do we have in my 6 what other countries intelligence do you think would have had ties to jeffrey? i've seen him would find a beneficial to keep this client less thought. well, since there was a member of the royal family who was intricately involved in this operation, and not saying what he was from the other end of it and that he was accused prince andrew, shall we say he was at a minimum of twos to being involved with young girls, certainly i would say in my 6 would be involved, it would be, i don't know that they were, it would be reasonable to conclude that if in fact, this is an intelligence agency knowing that one of the jeffrey happens a proceeds associated with a former intel is rarely prime minister and that a member of the royal family is allegedly involved. those are the 2 countries that

i would look at 1st. but again, if you look at as an example, what happened with cross fire hurricane the, we had most food from rome we had down or from uh, australia. so the 5 i is, is, uh, you know, i think is one intelligence agency at this point. okay, so then going for from this thing we, we have a problem with trust the media, we have problem with trust of the government. shouldn't both of those be working to prevent sex trafficking rings? now we're looking at private business being held accountable for it. is this a positive step? do you believe and accountability at least for business? and will we ever see that happen for government and the truth? we have how strong the government was tied to epstein. i would say no, it's not the positive for this reason because what we're getting is a shell game. what we're getting is all we caught the people that did it, and this was just some bad people doing bad things. so the accountability would be to trace this back to the intelligence agencies and find out who was behind this and what it was, which they can't do. so you can't address an issue if you can hold the people who

are involved accountable, which we can, we can, we can have the mask of who was involved, then we can go after just daily, we can go after bill gates, whoever people who were involved on on the periphery, but those who actually the puppet masters are going to walk. and so therefore i don't, i don't see this is a positive development for accountability. you would have thought $290000000.00 to be a wake up call. but i guess when you're as big as jp morgan and you realize you still have a lot more to lose, you keep your mouth shut. thank you so much for doing is currently on this issue and will continue to fall. we will keep this in the headlight when everybody else isn't. i am sky now. here's, and this has been your 360 view of the news affecting you say show us the

i think ukraine does exist, should exist. and it is precisely the best option. i suspect for its future is to find that amalgam of the cultures that are within it and turn it into something unique and flourishing. that that would define it in distinction but not conflict but, but simply the difference between itself and its neighbors. the, [000:00:00;00] the,

the, the headlines on off the international as russia, it strikes back huge miss all solve those humble, ukrainian port cities. getting naval drove in facilities of moscow says, why do we spend mondays ukrainian terror attacks on the crime in britain of south africa. it gets ready to host a summit of the bricks group of countries next month. it reaffirms, it would not arrest light in a coach. and if he attends, we'll have a live discussion on that shortly. also like the american lead visit of russell's summit, deliberate, a final communicating in hopes of finding a united style on, on the credit card. the . all right, well, the top stores in a ton of guests. welcome to choose a headlines. one ology international. you won't be finding any mainstream narrative

is on this that must go, such as false as if conducted a series of retaliatory strikes on military targets in the ukranian full of cities of a desolate and to calliah. it is a response, the key of deadly attack on russia's crime in bridge of the russian ministry of defense says the precision strikes it aside, where ukrainian naval drones are being stored unprepared along with the ship yard and an oil facility that provided fuel to keeps forces it comes as a rough and forces reported that a massive ukrainian drone attack on crime it was repelled earlier on choose a van to sound $28.00 unmanned vehicles were intercepted. now the retaliatory thrives, came shortly after russia's president called for a military response to your crane's attack on the crime in bridge, which vladimir putin to describe as an act of power must do both. so this one actually did with another terraced act, was committed on the bridge. civilians were killed,

a child was injured and left without parents. the family had left to go to crimea from the belgrade region. i asked to provide all the necessary assistance to the injured girl and her relatives to f. s. b. the investigative committee and a number of other agencies had been instructed to investigate the incident in detail. what happened is another terrorist attacked of the key of regime. this crime is senseless. from a military point of view, it has no meaning since the crimean bridge has not been used for military transportation for a long time, and cruel, because innocent civilians were injured and killed. of course, there will be a response from russia. the ministry of defense is preparing the corresponding proposal. a rough it was and a tire is. committees had to ukrainian naval drones, attack the bridge in the early hours of monday and killed the mother and father and severely injured that to you. nice daughter of a spine is a key gateway from the russian mainland to the peninsula. russian investigators of

course, opened a criminal pro. they've said they're only finding squarely points, a key of authorities now say the bridge is fast being repaired and global affairs and security specialist talks about leah told us that incidents like this are basically a ukrainian attempt to shift public sentiment here in russia. the only way for the average game, so only hope not only of, of, not really of winning this conflict, but coming out of it in any type of complete situation is to shatter the morale of the russian people to make them turn on the government. they know that conflict cannot be one military. they know that they're already exhausted out of artillery shells and vehicles that can usually be supplied to the key every game. that's why they've always been more concerned about optics, about the information more than with any actual strategic value,

which is why they hit the civilian part of the bridge. both the us and the united kingdom had green lake have for you know, green lit for the coverage seem to launch attacks in cry. mia, so there beyond complicit. they're actively involved here. the long awaited somebody between 11 american leaders in the u in, in brussels. i didn't go in favor of western powers, a members of the cycled community of latin american and carry in the states appended the agenda with a harsh criticism, saying us lead sanctions at the end of the day. violate international using sanctions and blockades without the support of international law is something that only serves to penalize the most vulnerable parts of the population. we need peace to overcome the significant challenges we have to face instead of eliminating hunger for so many millions of human beings. we're spending billions of dollars to feed the war machinery which only causes more destruction and famines. the see like you,

summit is the moment to say enough. it's like when you're really angry with somebody . and so you just punch a wall over the yard and hope that they notice the resilient president statement here really captures the tone of the summit between the you and the community of latin american in caribbean countries, also known as you are. it's taking place this week, but it can best be described as i guess tense, if only because latin america for them. it's kind of like agreeing to meet up with an old high school power. who, you know, wants something from you every single time you see them, they pretty much say that, but they also try to frame it as something that's good for you and in your best interest. so the even went into this meeting, the 1st of its kind it 8 years with really clear objectives to get support for ukraine to get its hands on some resources and to get it cuts in on the regions, slow dance with china and russia. so right as a gate,

lula lambasted western sanctions without directly confronting the vineyards. yahoo, are you talking about so, and more often than not, they just blindly agree and follow us section. so he also made a very pointed reference there to the billions blown by the west on its military industrial complex using ukraine is a project. so again, that's not something on which the us is alone right now. they're all trying to get a slice of that particular pipe. now the honduran president joined in on this particular pylon and put brussels on the spot, demanding that the you stand up, get some washington's punitive measures taken against latin american countries. the seal of you summit must approve a resolution demand to the end of the blockade against cuba. it is necessary to empire st and the confiscation of goods, because we're all exposed to one day finding that our monetary reserves have been frozen in foreign banks. or we do not have the possibility of chartering transport

for the goods that are people's needs. we demand that elimination of the barriers that prevent us from normalizing our commercial relations with sister countries like nicaragua. so there's been an undercurrent of pricing was that meant throughout this entire meeting with europe's colonialist history in latin america and slavery in africa brought up and the prime minister of st. vincent and the grenadines, who's also present a pro 10 for a of c loc. also a vote restorations. he said that the summit can become yeah, the other venue for focusing on ukraine either and that. well, there are other places for that which are better suited. which probably meant that brussels had to throw like 20 percent of its content because that's all they ever seemed to be able to talk about these days. apparently, spanish president pedro sanchez invited you free and presently bombers with you to the summit. but apparently it was opposed by some of the latin american leaders. zalinski confirmed that himself rock moscow did not miss the opportunity to weigh

in on that particular offer. maybe zalinski the former ask for a pin star and a new version of the movie wedding process where he just goes around, barging in on global events from oscars to your vision and political meetings that don't actually involve his country. then. so even president nicholas venturo was not present at this summit, his vice president delsey rodriguez was keep in mind that the us still has a $15000000.00 bounty on maderos head. they've accused him of narco terrorism, even as washing then negotiated a venezuelan oil deal to help us economy amid the global energy instability and energy crunch that they helped create over at our rest of the sections. still, mid euro acura would be the same anti sanctions message as his regional counterparts. and a message that he issued from the same time as the state as the summit was getting,

getting into year i got locked out of the voice of venezuela. we'll be heard there the truth of venezuela to demand a distinction sees that the blockade see so that the aggression against venezuela seized pluck. brussels hasn't exactly been in the habit of standing up against washington's agenda, but it seems like lots in america wants to see proof of some kind of backbone that isn't just a trojan horse for washington's interest. and brussels has been trying for years now to see a trade deal with the latin american region, but its own farmers are pretty livid about that potential, particularly when it comes to beef from latin america. and it's potential to depress the prices of e u. farmer's own supply, which really seems to be one of the use big specializations these days. they did pretty much the same thing when they flooded eastern europe with ukrainian grain from the black sea grain deal. now the use seems to lack of vision beyond whatever washington puts in front of them at any given time, and for all of latin america's efforts here. well,

that really doesn't seem likely change anytime. just love to take this conversation