Skip to main content

tv   News  RT  July 21, 2023 12:00pm-12:30pm EDT

12:00 pm
skills to george mean we, you, we could all back. okay, so the bike and administration is for the war. overwhelmingly. trump is against vitamin. so support trump, you see what i mean? how it kinda plays that, that plays into that because it's clayton is mentioned, you know, the more you're educated about this, the more questions that are, that are brought up. but then there's also a political wedge issue. i'm against this because he's for me. i think there is part of that as well. george? yes. a without question. and uh and i think that's the problem. there's originally but with chrome and, and his acolytes is that they're constantly attacking by them. but it's not clear always what are they attacking by and follow because some of them are attacking buying but not doing, you know, do i have the ukraine and, and drum says what it wouldn't have happened if i were president, because i was so top and you know, built in with the dad to do anything with me and, and so, so of the difficulty however, is i,
12:01 pm
i agree with the police and is that there is the public perception of ukraine is very different from the perception of the foreign policy making absolutely gone home and supporting the ukraine, but because i think you've greenville, when they just want to go on bleeding. russia, however, the public as you know, as, as not being suicide yesterday by that will the polls show that there's no in, susie, as on board this, you know, no way do you see any demonstrations against russia i'm going to is see being in the bowl is money on the landscape. i don't, you know, we go on hand and you know there's no money, but this is no money for health care. no money for dental care, whatever. but does it promptly infinite amount of money? but uh, as soon as get the question that is, how do we get to some kind of democratic accountability? oh, well, we'll do back, we'll get to that with the war powers act that we just pay the past. the send, the 2nd half of the program. i claim nice a good george davis,
12:02 pm
a wonderful segue into the self destruction of mike pens by tucker carlson, which is very interesting is because, you know, as i said in my introduction, you know, much of the republican base is salary this year, but not the leads and this is one of the things that george and i have talked about a lot over ever since the conflict started this iteration of meaning in february of last year. is that now we're seeing the real start difference between well, the establishment and everybody else. well, it was interesting to watch tuckers is this the ration of a lot of these candidates over the past few days and you really, you're absolutely right about it. there's this dichotomy between the people in the audience and the sort of automaton sewer up on stage. mike, pen speaking we're, we're the perfect perfect robot, right? the neoconservative robot, and i think one interesting narrative emerged when you watched all of those interviews. it was this idea of we can walk and chew gum at the same time. and so
12:03 pm
they're having this very narrow debate right now. biden is too slow to get, gets into ukraine. we would really, the better. yeah, that's the spectrum. you know, and, and so there is no daylight at all between democrats and republicans. but you have this audience sitting there saying, wait a minute. why are we to this vacuum cleaner? that's ukraine. why are we doing this? when our bridges are collapsing in the united states? when we have a fit, no crisis pouring across our borders when it and they're working harder for less money is the us dollar continues to be the valued. so it's amazing to watch georgia definitely right. there is an absolute thirst for continuing the military industrial complex in the united states and just follow the money. and all of those mansions that pop up around washington dc. they're all fueled by the military, industrial complex and defense contractor. so the money is just, and then of course you'll have this you of all hearing next week. and the military
12:04 pm
industrial complex will make even more money. once that, that disclosure project comes out, they'll make trillions instead of billions. you know, judge, it was interesting. these are the nikki haley. let me see, might not have been obliterated, but she certainly learned her lesson from mike pence. ok meeting. she does doesn't really say anything substantive. she never has before. why should we expect that now? but the what the, the, the, the tucker interviews showed, it least if you, if you're interested in the topic of the, there are red lines. there are people have certain limits and they don't like being like, i like to, okay, it's for democracy. okay, so then why are there okay, well, it's about transparency. why can't you have an audit of all the money that's going? they're excited people, you know, people don't like to be treated. is it? yeah, the question, and it's was very striking that the in the 2016 when the
12:05 pm
trump um, what is this array to his full of his or republican opponents? he did it by a very clear a lie to about iraq. you absolutely. it was a comb job that and, and you went further, you said that they knew it was a tongue job. those deaths to thousands of americans are on them because they lied to the american public. and everyone assumed, well, this is the end of trauma. you know, you know, he, he dial survivors and he's the republican vote to seal the deal. yeah. you're absolutely right. we will lied to. and this was in south carolina, you know, where you're the home of all the veterans. yeah. so, so you have to write the people want, you know, the true. so and on and they told about ukraine about zalinski has been lies. and, and that is, that isn't any build and that's also explains dr. carson's notice reputation. i mean, he's standing among the republicans is extraordinary. and topic also has been the
12:06 pm
one person on the main stream media who has been absolutely outspoken on the the subject of the ukraine. yeah. yeah. he's not afraid. he's not afraid. everybody else has put into a pos you're being afraid of going to i find a bobby kennedy junior, this position on this very interesting to so you have a obviously he's not the front runner in the democratic primary because it, but i mean, he is prominent within the party and he'll to alternative media. he's very, very popular now, like in the mainstream here. but it was very interesting in about maybe not saying the same things, but both being skeptical and both being marginalized, uncensored and blocked by the main stream, media. and it's amazing to watch when they say something, what you're allowed then to cover in youtube censoring videos blocking shutting down entire channels because of what bobby kennedy junior has to say. i don't agree with him on everything at all. but i think when you have
12:07 pm
a candidate who's willing and afraid to come out and say, you know what, he says, i'm gonna shut down all the military bases around the world. do you ever think they're going to let him become president of the united states? when he says that i'm going to dismantle the military industrial complex. i'm going to take and shut down these military bases i did with my wife. how can i say that quite, and how can you say that you're going to feel the comment on? isn't that a comment on like, on the or seeing america you just said they'll never allow him to do that? well, i, well, what happened to the democratic process? yeah, i mean, that's beside, i think we're now really seeing through this facade that they need to do is go back seen these nuggets of bernie sanders right when, when m. s. nbc producers and whistle blowers and m. s. nbc came forward and admitted that they were told that they were not allowed to put bernie sanders on television right then even in their graphics that they had on their screen when they showed who's the poor, the candidates running for president. right now, it was interesting to see in, you know,
12:08 pm
andrew yang and other people removed from the graphic and they had comma harris on there who was pulling lower than bernie sanders lower. you have bernie sanders, who's winning, but you can't have him on the show. you can't do the man, i have to go to a hard break here. we're going to jump in here. we're going to go have a hard break late the pieces a x of today because there's a lot of that censorship on many topics in schools that start to just the migration topics. to my impression it went on this, the climate change, gone back and spent almost send them a call. you see it's, i mean, there was no, there was no way of debate. it was either or the s. and now it's about russia and
12:09 pm
it's about, yes, we have to fight russia and russia has to be taken off the map. the prospect where all the things are considered. i'm peter of eldest as a home addition to remind you, we're discussing some real news. the george in budapest here in the last new cycle, we had other senate rejects congressional powers over nato, article 5, and it was a vote of a losing 16 to 83. we entered the pro 1st part of the program, talking about the democratic process. now we're talking about drafting the constitution. is it someone else is another country is security needs, trump,
12:10 pm
states, and products. the constitution that exactly is a bit of a brass bull hasn't bade the prop uh, democratic uh, observation that, you know, optical 5 of the knows that bands are treated does not trump the us constitution of the decisions about going to will. i'm determined by congress and i need to, but this is where, you know, the american, the political elite is of no, no, no, you know, we, we've gone, discuss that. we have to be binding on articles live is binding on us because we were told many times the article vibe doesn't say that you automatically go to walk . but even when you look at the north atlantic treaty good, makes clear, obligated to go to walk in circumstances as long as you're in conformity with 0 nations laws and the constitution. and so it's the same except even the north
12:11 pm
atlantic treaty. it has to follow its own laws and its own constitution, but it is a measure of how far america has degenerated. because there was a time when there was senators who expressed discomfort with the united states joining nato, the senate, those who are expressing discomfort over the expansion of major the was a debate. i mean, wasn't much of a debate, but the least of what some debates in the ninety's about expanding nato. now, i mean, other than rand full and even he does, it has been rather weak. but the other than rampal, there's no one was a pay where the hell is the man you dragging of the americans into? yeah, well it judge them right in our podcast to discuss the right length with article one of the treaty is, which is never mentioned meaning don't look, always brief, resort to diplomatic means to resolve conflicts here. but clean. what is it?
12:12 pm
what is the reason why i brought this up in? it's something a trend that i have been observing for a long time. you're in lisbon. you're in portugal. and uh, you know, we boomed itself to nato because, you know, we breaks it, you know, the, the of the, you case a back door back into europe and under nato. and the, what's called versus just codified exactly the same thing. i got you, i found this are, i mean i didn't see it in the main street. i would have missed it completely if i hadn't gone to alternative media plane. well, you, i think you're hitting the nail on the head, which is what, what is happening to the united states. you're literally, you're literally taking away american sovereignty and you're turning it over to this global on elected body. and it really gets you off the hook. what we're seeing at the world health organization level. so the, you know, under a pandemic treaty, what happens? well, the united states government is irrelevant. it's based on elect in body that gets
12:13 pm
to decide with the future of these countries. and i think this is, i know there's. busy this chatter and talk about this unit polar order versus a multi polar order, but i really think it is actually the debate right now. do we want to give up sovereignty to these large organizations, the do hours at hard? and so individual countries, whether it's netherlands and having other farmers, you know, lots of their, you know, thousands of farms because of something that is drawn up in brussels or the united states pandemic policy is something that the organization or why are we sending so many billions of dollars into this cauldron that's destroying the united states. but all of these questions are not being asked by people in washington dc. you're right, ran paul, maybe the only one that was asking that question and then he's even bent over and allowed these things to past. oh there's no, there's no audit of the amount of money we're sending it. well, i guess i didn't get it. okay, i won't hold it up anymore. let's just push it through. so weak is
12:14 pm
a great way to describe it, and it's really, really troubling. the sentence rejection. you know, this constitution over the over this i, i'm really where we go from here and how much will you see that the united states and it just had to longer at warner rack, after 20 years, we took, we have to literally, when did we even announce a war, when did we actually actually put, when did congress approval war this? the did it, but the with the recent vote in and go to george right now they will, they will, they even refuse to affirm the constitution protect showing that they don't affirm the parameters and the sovereignty, but can use that word of the come see if they refuse to do that. that's extraordinary. never happened in our lifetime squared away quite strongly. remember a few days ago, they also had a vote, and it was, i think, some congressmen who had a stipulated is a condition of what that the binding them is. trace playing each strategy, what is it trying to achieve?
12:15 pm
and if it doesn't come unexplained what he's trying to achieve, then they'll be no more money. and that was, it goes little. so both adults, so you can, you are elected politicians who presumably are elected in order to oversee the proper spending of the taxpayers money saying don't, emma, we, we don't want to do that. you don't have to come to us. you don't have to explain how your, how you're spending all money and that's the same thing with the old. no, no, no we, we don't want it. would it? we trust you, you that all this money is, you know, 100000000000 do 100 bill and who knows how much money is being spent. yeah, it's whole being spent perfectly appropriately. we do with the tool. they need an audit of donald trump's businesses in new york city. yes, that's the key. exactly. yeah, that's the most important stuff. right? yeah. the meeting board and bucket what you're doing with tax way of money. i. you just go ahead and keep doing what you're doing. you know, clinton, one of the things that i find really we will all of this. remember that it's brandy
12:16 pm
to war and the rack and the same strategy is being used even though the new york said we lose our less of the watch. do we want or less? we, you know, we won't be, we won't fall for this again. but they are because the b, u. nato is phone is a supposed to be a defensive military organization so that you'd be talking about geo political positioning and security to a, a, a crusade, a crusade of the west. you mounted joseph browse, you know, the garden, they know all of this year. it is, the security is really kind of an after thought here because, you know, the whole idea of expenses being the visibility of security for all we are no longer in that we, we, you know, we, we got on tethered from that. okay. and, and as long as we're untethered from that, we're going to be living at a time to be in tennis insecurity, you know, by the way, facing, is watching. so that's a great point. it's a question i've asked for years when people would say to me, well this is for you when you hear the rhetoric from george w bush and,
12:17 pm
and all of them. and dick cheney and others, this is making us safer. that by going into a rack, you know, tie a yellow ribbon around a tree and in america, and this is making us safer. i mean, my brother was in baghdad. so during the gulf war and i mean how, how we see for was our security improved here. in the united states, by invading and destabilizing the middle east. like please explain that to me. i'd love to hear how that works. how are american troops in syria providing security for the united states and then shipping it to a rack? how i was sending hundreds of billions of dollars into ukraine, making people in iowa safer. please explain. i would love to hear how was it actually helping you crate george? i mean, they don't, you know, i've said on my program, you know, you know, in a rack and i've always didn't, we help them and, you know, maybe we should stop helping these be boys. they as these lead say, because the more a that is being sent to, to your brain,
12:18 pm
the longer the board or your brain gets, if it's absolute, the, there's a, you know, in x or a will cause and effect that the more money that pulls in the more native they get, the more a countries destroyed. i mean, what's happened the day, but what happens the syria? i mean, it will not have well, have obama not going on with this brilliant idea to affect regime change. you know, i saw was go before that. oh god, i don't see months ago you know, me, libya look what's happened is that or then it goes in that same wonderful year in 2011 and they said, you know, they had the sali and yeah, most goes, although haven't had that war yet and it's been goes up to the total devastation of the country of the country, and certainly hasn't done anything for the united states, but it's just the started, the many middle was even though back. so one of the george w bush's was, and this is really the legacy of nature, and even even going beyond what was,
12:19 pm
i mean, the game fact that he's had in this, then you're a little the divisiveness and you know, they, they, he's the area that's over well, many countries easier, but you know, basically have had quite a peaceful life. it wasn't, there wasn't any of this. and they made conflict between the, the, the, are terrible political bitten. this is mary and romania molto. but all of that is, is effect the is an effect of the us and they to expansion know, you know, the george gave a really good litany. a menu of failed mcclain, where we were, i have one minute left here but the different there's a big difference. this time you go to the, the u. s. is leading the collective west against a nuclear power called russia. that's been different. don't you think one minute? absolutely thing why they're continuing to push for, you know, saying well no nuclear power, nuclear weapons that's off the table. so we're running a big play underneath that nuclear threshold. we're going to play our little game
12:20 pm
in our little garden, expanding nato, and all of these additional countries. and funneling as much money as we can to the expansion of nato. and we're saying we're out of weapons now. i'll continue, we're out of weapons. so you know what, we need to ramp up on a war footing. you heard this in britain, you heard this last week in washington. we need to go to a war footing. now. what does that mean? well, we're out of weapons now. so we kaplan's more patriot missiles, more jets, expansion expansion expansion. what happens in data being a defensive organization? yeah, well i at the expense of health care and education and i know border security and all of that claim. it was wonderful having you on and what i think my guess in lisbon and in budapest and one's like our viewers are watching us here are dc. next time, remember prospect the to take a fresh look around as
12:21 pm
a life kaleidoscopic isn't just a shifted reality distortion. by power to division with no real live indians fixtures designed to really once a better wills. and is it just because it shows you presented? it is fine. can you see through their illusions, going underground? can the motions of this is just a full class. as most of those things, it's 5 live, live on some powers i'm pushing problem to directly intervene in the putting conflict. also as a power plant, which you can see behind me is now the only domestic electricity supply for this tree. it's working at maximum capacity on the current circumstances, able to cover even 10 percent of the regions needs during pick 10 functions season
12:22 pm
more than a pipe dream, a huge new rush production facility for the liquefied natural gas. and that basically launched in the northern pool city the final project will see 3 l n g nicholas location trains transpose 6600000 tons of allergy aids per yes. using this in all the tape technologies, the life of most of the in 30 minutes of news and views starting now. washington says it will provide an additional $380000000.00 and humanitarian assistance for applica . it's being seen as a move to counter rushes, activities on the continent by relying on such reflect those as possibly additional she, we've soviet union, the availability of kitchen cabinets, values, offices,
12:23 pm
debate. it's on the job for you to call opportunities of security and started to community business on market time. house. one can predict the shelf future targets for my life duties and us. what do you submit? because should anticipate this possibilities, a number full russia and this book sees into sa, hey, i'm old up. this is in africa, the kind of democracies to our bundle in the region. well, what we are seeing is that the legacy of this kind of seen advertise because of quite the data is one and a through altered history, the united states, and that to q objectives on the african fox news as a result of backs its policies. a lot to the reaction to be mixed with explanations, neglects and hawk hawk to attempt at 2 minutes here in the system. this even to this day, washington, primarily views the african continent as
12:24 pm
a problem to manage it stage off as a cost much shaping the next to seem to be. there is no question that in deepening and expanding these ties. us national security interests are being impacted from what we have seen in the past few months. i'm promising economy and demographic trends that have driven africa's emergency as quite a significant claim on the world stage. a lot of countries, a lot of causes and another allies kind of access to data. but the united states has the base to, to establish a clear and for active policy for africa. this is a strategic a blind spot policy makers cannot seem to shake. and one said that their competitors of do not have. here we don't see rush for creating fault lines in societies or engineering anti western sentiment. rather russia targets and exploits those countries where the spot lines already exist. wisdom countries associate the
12:25 pm
continents in a way that unix or social structures and they have established your own systems by giving per already to t economy. so bad that they have nobody to succeed, to, very, very concerned on the release should between russia and many of the countries off the african continent. it's to a point with throwing money into or radiation. countries has, once again become the west of main goal, just a minute and try and me to come across as if the off ways of to african countries. and china pays russia south africa has that essentially been subject to choose that side. and that also goes for the missing and you just erie in matches of african countries as well, which we have seen several times the how those interferences have made of matches
12:26 pm
worse, especially when it's construct and some african countries as these all the kind of tactics of my say that to me as you can countries look to russia in stage, because russia influenced in the african countries and public opinion as often being democracy. specifically mark moscow targets weak, unstable and failing states to seek their entry for influence. it is use this formula in countries like molly, the central african republic and sudan, all of which were in the throes of violence. instability and political uncertainty and possessing a dearth of transparency or democratic institutions for this political and security involvement often comes with a commercial component. under these political support and financial interest become entirely intertwined with those of host countries. making untangling these relationships even more difficult, then try as if the rest of the engagement in africa or with african countries, is new. when in actual fact, it is not. the relationship between russia and africa are back to me just to d,
12:27 pm
calling as ation. i mean, the soviet union, as you old know, established partnerships with african countries. soon all the big change, the independence it's, it's, it's an involvement. we're driven by a mixture of the economy, interest, and the need, the soviet union even engage many regions across the african box and as it, including the lives of my b as the likes of the. it also provided and support across a variety of fields ranging from industrial to military assistance. the russian influence on the continent is growing foster that at any point soonest begin the cold war. african lead is also very receptive to these moves and these aisle, which is a, by russia so much so that the us is concerned that african leaders have been too
12:28 pm
close to russia, which could put some of african the and the opportunity to add to benefits into the african leaders get political cover from russia at the united nations and other international for they get security for themselves at home. a continued hold on power off book revenue streams, and the counter to western lead reform processes. all of this is exposing the limitations of use diplomacy towards africa, but also the short sightedness office brought to, i mean, a relationship dominated by for an age to the detriment of foreign investment. even do russian images supplies. this was an example that demonstrated how insufficient this investment in africa's image is stick to since made it into a missed opportunity for the united states. as all of these elements could demonstrate a growing sense of fatigue within the wisdom, the forms of engagement with the african continent,
12:29 pm
and which is also calculated russia. meaning that this could explain the reasons why many african states have now started looking to rush, couple assistance and only oh, well, the united states, me stuck in old ways of doing business. russia is taking the opportunity to explore multiple avenues of engagement grants losses are being ignored by the west, and they will only get worse. now. that's the message from the russian present by them. if at some said, forces from other nations will be thrown into the conflict. now joined in the pseudo biology, correspondence shaped bows to get more on what was said, shade good, have you in the sea and that, but it says that the west is treating poland as an ex been level asset in the coffee. but why is that us?
12:30 pm
yeah, well i suppose president putin speaking at the russian security council, a very long comprehensive speech and some really, really interesting insights into that president putin's thinking. a lot of things that i've informed based on numerous channels on, on the russian side, ukrainian silence. i suppose it's centers around president putin's and russians view back to partner of that. you know, the poland is a key player here that poland has been energetically weaponized, if you like it against russia, present food, mentioning the soviet era when russian and even now there's recent polls suggest that it is anti russian sees now that this proxy war essentially against russia, there's exceptionally desperate attempts now to flood the battlefield with ever more weaponry at the backers. now see that this war is essentially failing. and he, he actually spoke very specifically about po.

13 Views

info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on