arizona sustaining the conflict by all means, especially as far as washington is concerned. g on the election, 124 divided by the distribution can afford to uh, have a uh that goes down to point oh, on their hands. anytime india and pakistan who remain neutral on the ukraine conflict, getting pressure from the southern western partners who are trying to convince them to change the tune on ukraine. because countries are receiving very cheap russian energy these days. and they perhaps seem to be more focused on domestic issues the but if lee has admitted that, almost all of the weight exported from ukraine under the black sea grain deal didn't actually go to african nations in need despite that being a major stipulation. but nevertheless, the western powers have actually tried to blame russia for food and security on the african continent, a 95 percent of ukrainian,

which is export it outside of africa. but if african countries don't receive that wheat, they will look forward elsewhere. and inevitably, the global price will rise. the consequence is that it will become more difficult for africa to buy it. but the stabilisation of regions that already face difficulties is clearly a problem that also affects europe. the tiny defense minister is suddenly a global agriculture expert. now, and the result is pretty much what you might expect. he is acknowledging. and finally somebody is. and the less the fact that the grain is not getting to africa, it's ending up in the but he's also trying to make people think that the greenville is really about feeding out her kind of when in reality it's just about making sure that you frame terms of profit by dumping their grain in europe, africa was barely even getting a fraction of it, judging by the united nations on data. and here this, the time minister is clutching his string pearls and imagining that it's going to

destabilize africa. now, if this keeps up, more like it's going to be stabilized europe, if they have to now feed their own grain to the pigs rather than using ukraine's for that purpose. and other western leaders are seeing similar sob stories about how russia is the bad guy for pulling out of the deal. this is something very studios that creates a lot of travel for many people. wait for an ice and they hung over their people. the result of rushes action today, weapon isaac food using it as a tool, as a weapon. it's war against ukraine. russia is responsible for denying food to people who are desperately need around the world and to contribute to rising prices . these products, apparently having no problem with the fact that western sanctions cause shipping and insurance problems that prevented brushing grain for being treated equally under the deal that was supposed to. also allow russian grains to be shipped out as

much as you crating rates or that russian president vladimir puts in repeatedly spelled it out for them like they were toddlers. that the grain under the deal was not getting to the countries most indeed. and that the whole thing was just really a dodge of protects to hamstring. russian exports was clearing the path for you, prince. and now both have and moscow or apparently both going to consider grain ships in the block c as potential carriers of military cargo. no more weapons deliveries to ukraine while pretending that it's humanitarian, cargo for starving africans. susan said that russia, if you consider returning to the deal, but the west has to 1st, you know, take off the clown shoes and try to be serious. and a few brain figure that it could just shrug off any potential problems, getting the grain oh, through the box, the ports and pivot to land for doors across europe. well, there are some sticking points with that because no less than cubes. best pal, poland, and other eastern european allies have put an end to creating grain landing in

their country. i want to make it clear. we will not open the border for grain products from ukraine on september. the 15th. we will only allow the transits, either that you were being commission will agree to jointly work how's regulations that will extend this band, or we will do it ourselves back in may europe's very own. queen ursula vander live european commissions. i'm elected president, stood alongside ukrainian president vladimir zalinski and promised that the you would get a grip on the fact that it could not manage to transport you praying rain through europe without dumping the food all over itself, like sometime toddler. and they said that, you know, they would sort out the rest with the member states who were suffering from classic examples of brussels and to be shipped there. but it's one of those rare points on which poultry and it really underscore that regardless of these e. u. member states added to towards russia. they are not going to hesitate to send

zalinski into the backseat, if it means protecting their own national interest and their own political backsides. delegation from the most on be pulled, the un security council. the key problem of the grain deal as must go, has previously said was that only a tiny fraction of the food supplies actually reached africa. according to you, in that around to 53 percent of export on the blacks, the deal is going to low income countries. it around 45 percent and there is to be need income states life and new york we go with that's kind of both end right. the starting by and joining us live good to see you. caleb has always sounds like some serious truthfulness being dropped to the un meeting. some of the key points, if you weren't sure of the un security council convened. and many countries spoke

prior to russia speaking a lot of allegations were level. and as we're reaching towards the end of the meeting, a half or a number of security council members in spoken, we heard deputy and passenger, dimitri pull janski's, then go ahead and get bach. many of the fingers that were pointed at russia. amenities allegations that were made, i was, he might, and i was listening. we listened carefully to your statements and were again struck by the degree of cynicism of the western members of the security council. i have a question for you. what did you actually expect from the very 1st days? would you everyone's attention to the fact that the initiative ceases to correspond to the originally stated goal? however, no steps have been taken to correct this trend. when we agree to the deal and heard calls to joint forces for global security, we expected an end to discrimination on the part of western states which imposed unprecedented sanctions against us. actually trying to organize

a blockade against our industries. the grain deal was important, not in our interest, but in the interest of the countries of the world that are most in need. as now throughout the meeting, the allegation was repeated. that blame was solely on the shoulders of russia for the great reign deals failure. uh and that was simply all. busy roches fault now, when the russian deputy ambassadors spoke, he pointed out the rush. it was willing to restore the deal. if you brain with the oldest end of the barge rush, i had extended the deal many times now. it was important to note that china spoke up and showed the not the whole world seems to by end of this logic and that they do indeed understand like other forces around the world understand that this green deal is a 2 way street rather than a one way street, here's what china had to say. and also the heat rush so has repeatedly stated in recent days that it is willing to concede the resume in the black sea grain and the

certificate if substantive progress can be made. and the only main agent helps that goes through process export of grain and fertilizer. so they'll china hopes that the relevant policies will act in maintaining international food security and alleviating the food crisis in developing countries. in particular, by working with relevant to you and agencies, the strengthens. i look and consultations, meeting each other halfway, striving for a balance solution with the to resume the exports of grain. and so to lies from russia, whether it's me who don't. now, polanski pointed out that much of the grain crisis was manufactured to make money grain futures, speculators are having a field day with the fluctuating prices and predicting the outcomes. and there's a lot of money to be made on this. in addition to that, uh, fully entity pointed out, the ukraine destroying the ammonia pipeline. that was a pretty big deal breaker. well, the termination, okay, level of the box,

a grain deals definitely triggered some changes, definitely in the conflict design and perhaps in the maritime zone as well. what can you tell us? well, a lot was made of the meeting by critics of russia about the fact that russia announced that every ship would now be inspected. however, the detractors of russia failed to mention that the ukrainian government is doing the same thing. they don't seem to have any outrage about yeah, taking such measures. it's also important to point out that for the last year, the ports that were being used under this green deal were in fact being carrying out and hosting concealed military activities, which is a clear violation of the deal who was supposed to shut the fuck. i think for taking into account the facts i have given, no one should have been surprised by the decision we made to terminate the black sea initiative and curtailed the maritime humanitarian cord. or over the course of

the year of the deal, which you have regime accumulated, significant military, industrial fuel and storage capacities and areas of it's lexi ports under cover, substantial human resources of the armed forces of ukraine and foreign mercenaries . we're also stationed there with the termination of the deal. we have an opportunity to correct the situation. the russian armed forces have been carrying out strikes on military industry facilities for fuel infrastructure and a munition depos of the armed forces of ukraine within the vicinity of odessa and took a life with precision sea and air based weapons. since july 15th it is to shift and the dispute is no rush i made clear before the un security council that they are willing to re open the deal ukraine can fulfill it. and. ready the bargain, however, that was pretty much ignored by western leaders who proceeded to point fingers and grandstand and blame russia for the entire situation. a lot of the asterix,

but it appears not of much, not much in terms of finding mutual understanding was really achieved at the 15 member body. that leaves the united nations, the un security council meeting. alright, kyler appreciated, thanks for that. so the rise of the multi polar world got this south africa now says more than 40 countries of lined up seeking to join the brick strategic group. all that ahead of the upcoming summer in johannesburg. next month, a south africa's envoy to the group. and they also clouds that brooks has become a rising power, which is good. this bruce is not at a close plot of countries breaks has always been changed. relationship with the logic, global community says 2013, but it says i had an outreach program whenever we've at summit we've had the brakes outreach and since 2016, the brakes for us. well,

we invite adidas from the global sol as well as he's going to need is to interact with bricks leaders. and we are going to be the same at the 15, but some of that would be hosted by south africa. the oldest in john, this book president from a full size invited on efforts and leaders as well as at least for the leaders from the global south leaders that currently it's the major a vision of bodies like the g 77. as in cat, a column, the gulf corporation console, and other sites for each the bodies to the summit to interact with the exhibits. so i think bruce has always been a closer. we have been open to talking before monkeys in the world. we do not distinguish between the north and south. we will talk to any entity that has the same vision for multi loses and they put a boat builder on it. well,

we do not much to lice large parts of the world because as you know, the developing luna comes for 85 percent of the global population. and yet we are on the margins of the decision making. there has been no reform united nation system, no reform of the security council. no reform of the bretton woods is a fusion. and that is one breaks is charting and you find a new block to find alternatives to the unjust and unfit, an ok, global governance. institutions that exist today. brits did not seek to become a governance because only saw what break 6 to do is become a major influence in an inclusive manner to work for change. we have looked through the periods of domination. we have looked through the beauty of the engine was we don't want that was where we have one or 2 global engine. one's. we don't want the union for the world. we talked to the judge, we don't want to buy for the world. we talk either just that because we have see

the divisions that springs to the global community and that works against creating a more inclusive look. what groups want us to see is it was, well, we have multiple, multiple phones, the fall market. the line so far from the ships for the betterment of our countries in the world and to make the united nation system reflective of the kind of global realities and that it is not today. so yeah. so one of the key issues being discussed by bricks, countries in the run up to the summit, is a way to transition away from the us dollar and international trade. that includes the creation of a bricks, currency, and the establishment of an alternative mechanism for payments. admittedly, that process is expected to take some time. but as russia says, countries need to free themselves from depending on the american green. meanwhile, increasingly more countries have been considering

a bigger role for currencies that are alternatives to the us dollar for international trade. it is now no longer possible to completely rely on western financial mechanisms as washington uses the dominant position of its national currency as a tool of political blackmail and punishment for supposedly undesirables. while the head of a state initiative called productivity south africa says the rising influence of the global south does pose a serious challenge to what he calls the traditional gemini, of the collective west. the now that the bricks is starting to liberate his power. and now that you've got over 40 countries wanting to join, there is no doubt in my mind that things are going to change. and this would be a nightmare for countries that have always occupied the dominant part of the table that i've always been very imposing in the way they do things. and i would say that

i've always been very, i don't get in the way they do things. and for me, this would lead to a huge focus on developing country apples. why your routines? because as developing countries, we've allowed it for too long that we'd be led by people who have no knowledge of the environments we come from. and the economies that we seek to enhance as so that we only have the same kind of strength and resources that the dominant partners have enjoyed. these a huge share of political and economic and just general your political shift, right. i think for many is the brakes. countries have always had to be inherent paula and was liberating that paula: the other countries that a very powerful countries, i mean, countries like mexico, countries like indonesia, country like all julia kind of like to buy. so basically saudi arabia,

so middle east america, all the countries, but i think historically very strong and south saul cooperation, members, in many instances of the south side and tie as well. so this promises to be and of course the meeting front season and there for some aging time in terms of global change. so pack of sizes are sticking to us neutral position and denies the country has supplied any weapons to ukraine or that message directly coming from the countries foreign minister a. this opportunity to reiterate, that we find it regrettable that such and media outlets have tried to publish unfounded reports alleging ministry suffice to ukraine. since the war began, we have not concluded any agreement for defense supplies to ukraine. keeping in view of principles consistent and non fox, perhaps a bit awkward or the statement was delivered at a joint news conference alongside his ukrainian counterpart, dimitri calais, but he's on

a 2 day visit to his lama by that is the 1st visit by ukrainian foreign minister since 1993, and of course while keith is looking for support in the conflict with russia, pack of stone has refused to take aside. we spoke with the editor in chief, all vietnam about telegraph tests, what a class that he says that despite the sudden pressure from some friends in the west coast on his choosing to strengthen his ties, instead with china and russia. but just sanity, if i can find, have been under the impression of i'm not getting on the bus on block as well, and this is a, a pockets on has history to come on the bachelor front. i'm not going to the list on block of, but i think things have got a gent pockets on has the buckets on government sticking. i love what are my you the house, dickens, and lubbock cn integrated in fast stuff. i could find the middle of the, but the fun, see, i'm not going to as an enemy, you know, and the american sentiment from the high end,

if i could find them all under the impression of the spot gets on like a minute. so i could find these know if i could find it, come but gomez, i decided to import, you know, the, i'm in g and o data from what i saw and no good. they should have gotten from the bucket finding use on the pockets on it, on the go menu to uh, you know, make elaborate. and uh, what's the relationship with the, uh, chinese and the russian. so i can tell you that that the box on has actually chosen to be in a russian lead book, and not the americans are going to become history. one has come to discuss if i could find out america. meanwhile, germany has been pushing another south asian nation india to condemn russia despite new daddy's neutral stones on the conflict. the country's advice translated robert

. hop back, deliver those comments on a visit to the indian capital that was supposed to be focusing on green energy said read yesterday and youtube and as of ongoing, i think it's not come to be the last on so, so i would be very, very glad and what even had in our relation, if you, if he's trying to key our language and say this as an aggressive, it's a one sided aggressive. it's put into more depth. a few of the from great hope india has been adamant that it shall remain neutral in regard to the ukraine conflict. the drum and vice chancellor noted india is traditional partnership with russia. but he insisted that new delhi should take the side of western apartments. india has refused to cape into pressure to adopt any sanctions against moscow. as russia is one of his largest energy supply has his india in his store and profess a capital too much. they need something they're asking for something that showed up

on this or dropped technology dish on of things to let them ask what they want. they have tried to hit on somebody guns. i've tried to jump right. but can you have any pull by what can you search for? what did you have things on its own? a list of genes did i do? do we have nothing to say? because you see we are able to horse the subject upstream the app. so it, we don't dictate what you have to see to make them see what they want to see if it is, he didn't want to have to do that a little bit to get it fixed. i think, did you realize this that this should not have raised this this shows that even the not do god face russia all, it's all. that's why it is amazing such a huge you know, the countries begging of the countries and the country like it built in strong pastry to be let me try that. that's why they are doing it because they realized

their calculations on calculations. if on draw they will give a shit about the blockade field. they thought they will be the, the, these goals which we are giving to you. great. they will be able to pressure she up the field in the stance on its own. but if the germans want to activate a just funny and they think they can do that at all. i think that will be the big mistake because they have not been understanding via the prism leadership stance. and what fall or just a bit of a side note, in fact, the india is trade with russia these days as many old rubles and rubies. additionally, india as been getting very cheap energy from russia, which it in ton sells to europe. of course you are if i still devouring russian energy, but you are paying politicians. well, it just went to the,

the, the hello and welcome across stock were all things are considered on people about american voters are rarely interested in foreign policy during election cycles. that said the issue between maybe the exception this time round, particularly among g o p voters, much of the republican base, a sour them ukraine policy. they see it as biden's war. the

discuss these issues and more enjoyed by my guess, door to send you what are we in budapest, he's a pod cast or the goggle, which can be found on youtube and locals. and in lisbon we crossteck, like morris is host of the redacted news podcasts and a former fox news baker. part gentleman, prospect music. the fact that needed to get a jump any time you want. and i always appreciated by george in budapest, it was very interesting how over the last few weeks out of the ukraine policies played out in the us presidential election. but having said that, a foreign minister lobrado said on the last new cycle, which i think is quite interesting said, we know what we're fighting for. what is the bike and ministration fighting for, as well as, as a very good question, as far as one can. so these 5 things will the right to keep the wall going in definitely um is doing good business for us on the manufacturers. and it's getting russians. honest. lindsey graham same is the best money i ever spent,

you know, the reference of buying. so i, and that's all is the only strategic objectives of it. is it possible to do some in the case of uh, buy them. i mean, when it comes to the republicans office, they, uh, they're all the, the neo cons. and there is donald trump and trump himself. however, as always, has been ambiguous. so mean he's not quite sure. does he want to be the tough guy who's going to, you know, stand out the boat and bring this waterman and photos they want to be the piece? make a will finally. uh then, you know, be, deliver what everyone obviously wants. so he's bringing in both ways, and this happened during his presidency with me. and when you tried to sit on 2 stools, tried to use a full in between the a, you know, cleaning. it's very interesting looking at the main stream media coverage of the conflict in ukraine and it's, it's about 99.9 percent in one direction. but at the same time, you have a lot of people and if you look in alternative media and the pod cast and whatnot

is almost the reverse, there's in an enormous amount of skepticism in this skepticism is only getting more intense as people actually learn more about the context of the conflict, your thoughts? i, i agree with you. i think that there's been an awakening when we were covering at the beginning of the war and drawing attention to this is not just started in february. this goes back many, many years. there's a lot of context here. let's talk about victoria newland. let's talk about all of the pieces under the obama administration that were put in place to get us to this point. the expansion of nato, and people would say, no, no, you can't talk about that. we were banned and blocked in censored and taken off youtube and now being there so that we, we, you know, you know how it goes, right? so you've, you've been expand now. i think there's this awakening, this unfolding. and even just among, i know anecdotes right, really don't fly, but even like among friends who are sort of, wow, maybe had, you know,

ukrainian flags flying or, or, or pulled up in their, their, their twitter bios. you've seen a removal of that. you've seen flags removed just even going around portugal, other parts of europe, where you've had all of these flags and subway stops and, and billboards. and everything had been removed. and i think there's a growing awareness, and i think it's starting to trickle into the main stream, and i'm encouraged by that. it's a i like when people become educated. yeah, yeah, but it's sometimes it's really hard to get it out there. it doesn't charge. i mean, we, you, we could all be very skeptical here and take a step back. okay. so the bite and administration is for the war, overwhelmingly, the trump is against bite. and so support trump, you see what i mean, how it kind of plays that, that plays into that because it's clayton is mentioned, you know, the more you're educated about this, the more questions that are, that are brought up. but then there's also a political wedge issue. i'm against this because he's for me, i think there is part of that as well. george? yes. uh without question. and uh,

and i think that's the problem. there's originally but with chrome and, and his acolytes is that they're constantly attacking by them. but it's not clear always what are they attacking by them full because some of them are attacking buying but not doing, you know, do i have the ukraine? and and drum says what it wouldn't have happened if i were president because i was so top and you know, built in with the dad to do anything with me and, and so, so it, uh, the difficulty however, is, i mean i, i agree with the weights and is that there is the public perception of ukraine is very different from the perception of the foreign policy making. you lead the policy making a lead is absolutely gone home and supporting the ukraine. but because i think you've greenville, when they just want to go on bleeding, russia. 7 however, the public, as you know, as, as not being as soon as the last thing about the polls show that there's knowing

susie, as my board doesn't, you know, no way do you see any demonstrations against russia. it's just costing a lot of money. and i think that point is slipping into people's consciousness. say we're spending all this money on the landscape. how come, you know, we go on and then, you know, there's no money, but this is no money by health care. and then what date with dental care, whatever, but does it promptly infinite amounts of money? but uh, as soon as get the question is, how do we get to some kind of democratic accountability? so let's get a public view. oh we'll, we'll do back. we'll get to that with the war powers act images. pay the past the some of the 2nd half of the program. i clayton, i think it george gave us a wonderful segue into the self destruction of mike pens by tucker carlson, which is very interesting is because, you know, as i said in my introduction, you know, but much of the republican base is souring on this here. but not the leads, and this is one of the things that george and i have talked about a lot over ever since the complex started this iteration of meaning and february of

last year. is that now we're seeing the real start difference between the establishment and everybody else? well, it was interesting to watch tuckers is this the ration of a lot of these candidates over the past few days and you really, you're absolutely right about it. there's this dichotomy between the people in the audience and the sort of automaton sewer up on stage mike pen spring. we're, we're the perfect perfect robot, right? the neoconservative robot. and i think one interesting narrative emerged when you watched all of those interviews. it was this idea of we can walk and chew gum at the same time. and so they're having this very narrow debate right now. biden is too slow to get, gets into ukraine. we would do it more quickly, and that's literally the spider. yeah, that's the spectrum.