of grain and fertilizers, china homestead, the relevant parties will act in maintaining international fu, secuity and alleviating the food crisis in developing countries. in particular, by working with relevant to you and agencies to strengthen, di, look, and consultations, meeting each other half way, striving for a balance solution with the legitimate concerns of all parties to resume the exports of grain and so to lies from russia. now, polanski pointed out that much of the grain prices was manufactured to make money grain futures, speculators are having a field day with the fluctuating prices and predicting the outcomes. and there's a lot of money to be made on this. in addition to that landscape pointed out the ukraine destroying the ammonia pipeline, that was a pretty big deal breaker. much has been made out of russia's announcement that they will consider all ships at this point to potentially be carrying military hardware. and a lot of cheap was thrown at russia for that announcement,

but to have made the exact same announcement. and this seems to be ignored by russia's detractors. and it is important to know that the ports that were set aside for humanitarian purposes under the grain deal have been used for military purposes . throughout the last year, boom was supposed to show completely on the move part. i think for taking into account the facts. i have given no one should have been surprised by the decision we made to terminate the black sea initiative and curtailed the maritime humanitarian cord or over the course of the year of the deal. the key of regime accumulated significant military industrial fuel and storage capacities. in areas of its black see ports under cover, substantial human resources of the armed forces of ukraine, and 4 and mercenaries were also stationed there. with the termination of the deal, we have an opportunity to correct the situation. the russian armed forces have been carried now. it strikes on military industry, facilities, fuel infrastructure, and

a munition depos of the armed forces of ukraine within the vicinity of odessa indic alive with precision sea and air based weapons. since july 15th, no russian made clear before the un security council that they are willing to re open the deal ukraine can fulfill its end of the bargain. however, that was pretty much ignored by western leaders who proceeded to point fingers and grandstand and blame russia for the entire situation. a lot of the asterix, but it appears not a much, not much in terms of finding mutual understanding was really achieved at the 15 member body. that leaves the united nations, the un security council meeting. we were talking about earlier with the policy analyst, the of a great, a greg of who shed his thoughts on what he thinks that russia chose to. well, not renew the black sea initiative, the documents and run it, some calls it saying the content knowledge is with the us to get to the who we are

. great. so that's this concerns is we're not, we're not meant for instance, that the worst i could push a button for people who would be to connect it to spanish. but i still have not been done, but it wouldn't be for us to search on the record for our products, new to a new port, still not working for, you know, for the well least inch. the insurance essentials on a shift, jonathan, russian, i agree to receive unfortunately wasn't able to this so many parts of the in or for us as a positions for this renewal. so i have to be met. so it's a bit disingenuous to expect. does it come through with, with going to renew and agreement of state as also before, even though this is going to show us band with me is this michael, we're not going to be the guy that with prison represent putting the upcoming is a process after gotta come and pick on who am i to have for them be able to discuss easily step in the countries and where he can continue to trade and go to our products. is that

a day of violent protest in kenya between people demonstrate is on the police? we have this report from nairobi on the bus, i log into some of the it has a c, d, c running. but the police and the protest of police brutality has been quite the same. and that area and people haven't been taught to invest in people to see. but i would say for this, as you can see, residents are being brought on the same from the housing in templeton, by for yourself. the government because is this the ip protect asking for this property? goodness to on the case the so called on that is the email will be headed over to which is of the company, the less people supposed to the last 3 days. i don't know much of it to the company

for each for the associated to position as me one police on my team now being abducted some i've been east of custody press. how does this to be released and was sent? you know, is that a new one for you? some of these on file that has been moved from one is in phase 2, monday and thursday. so believes this weekend to be a risk for the police and the system is being split up this country and they wanted to do this with the president and the next week. and this goes into the country. so that's the kind of for some solutions that we move the country for. how we love these things from what i'm seeing that. but we're the ones on 2 sides to be funny. and if there's anything that we discussed is the

general good people, right? that would be no need is, but you something that was due to protest to the cost of living in case it comes to one of the key architects of the us, coo and t, as in 2014 the my down qu, victoria neutral, and she's on our way to africa with $380000000.00. i wonder why it comes to the us congressional committee held a hearing this week on power competition in africa. have a list by relying on such fact those us possibly initial she with soviet union. the availability of could to cut an actual values offices the backend by called up for you to kind of meet the needs on the job for you to call opportunities of securing instruct, digit community business on market time house. one can predict most just future

targets for my life duties and us, what do you submit? because should anticipate this possibilities a number for russia on this proxy. so hope that by dip into the keels into saw, hey, i know that this is in africa because based with do not this dates on or that democracies to our bundle in the region. well, what we are seeing is that the legacy of this part of the scene applica has become quite the data is once and through altered history, the united states, and that to q objectives on the applicant, fox news. as a result of that, it's policies a lot to the reaction to be mixed with explanation, neglects and how hard to attempt at communitarian assistance. even to this day, washington, primarily the views of the african continent as a problem to the managed main stage off as a cost much sapient. the next to seem to be there is no question that in deepening

and expanding these ties. us national security interests are being impacted from what we have the past few months that i'm promising economy and demographic trends that have driven africa's emergency as quite a significant claim on the world stage. a lot of countries, a lot of causes and another allies, the tendency is to, to access. but the united states has the base to, to establish in clear and for active policy for africa. this is a strategic blind spots. i must say that most of you is published in a cuz i cannot seem to shake. and one said that their competitors, the deluxe have here we don't see russia creating fault lines in societies or engineering anti western sentiment. rather, russia targets and exploits those countries where these fault lines already exist. of wisdom countries associate the continents and the way that it was internal

dynamics or social structures. and they have established your own systems by giving per our which c g economy, x location. it's gotten so bad that they have nobody succeeds. it is very, very concerned on the release sions, between russia and many countries on the african continent. it's 2 point we don't even need into already did to african countries has, once again become the west of main goal to try and see legitimate. i've been try me to come across as the off ways to african countries and trying to pace russia. south africa has recently been subjected to immense pressure. you know that to choose that side. and that also goes for the missing and you just feelings when matches of african countries as well, which we have seen several times the how those use

a few races that should have made matches worse, especially when it's construct and some ethnic contention as these all the kind of tactics of my say that to me as a can country looks to russian stage. because why should influence in african countries and public opinion as often been overlooked by wisdom, democracy, specifically mark moscow targets weak, unstable and failing states to seek their entry for influence. it has use this formula in countries like molly, the central african republic and sudan, all of which were in the throes of violence, instability, and political uncertainty, and possessing a dearth of transparency or democratic institutions. this political and security involvement often comes with a commercial component. under these arrangements, russian security assistance, political support, and financial interest become entirely intertwined with those of host countries. making untangling these relationships even more difficult, then try to been traditional bilateral ties as if we're russians engagement in

africa or with african countries, as news, when an actual fact, it is not. the relation between russia and africa are backed by it's i geological commitment to d calling as they should. i mean, the soviet union as the old no established partnerships with african countries. soon after they claimed the independence, its, its involvement was driven by a mixture of economy, interest, and the need to build alliances. the soviet union even engaged, are many views across my african parts and engine, including the lives of my b as the likes of the. it also provided support across a variety of fields of ranging from industrial to military assistance. the russian influence on the continent is free, foster that at any point is the end of the cold war. african lead is also very

receptive to these moves, and these of which is a, by russia so much so that the u. s. is concerned that the african leaders have been too close to russia, which could put some of africa in the country life. so that's it. as blow the end of what you need to add to fitness in the team. could the african leaders get political cover from russia at the united nations and other international for they get security for themselves at home? a continued hold on power off book revenue streams, and a counter to western lead reform processes. all of this is exposing the limitations of use diplomacy towards africa and also the short. so i took this office voter engagement would be in the continental, i mean a relationship dominated by for an age to the. ringback to meant a for an investment, even do a search for attendance or to russian energy supplies was an example that had

demonstrated how insufficient this investment in africa's it need to speak to since made it into a missed opportunity to pull the united states. and i ended a line all of these elements could demonstrate a slowly, since the fatigue with in the wisdom, the forms of engagement with the african continents. and which is also coupled with a message. russia, meaning that this could explain the reasons why many african states and now started looking to russia for assistance and only more a wildly united states me stuck in old ways of doing business. russia is taking the opportunity to explore multiple avenues of engagement when we spoke to a political economist who believes the african countries of ton to russia because perhaps that frustrated by the western lead unipolar well, or because, you know,

a lot of countries in africa, you know, who had been in a pro soviet union in the past of abundance or chevy zoom, and then they thought that they're going to, they've been liberal democracy. you need for a lot of work. that's where you know their democratic rights and freedom with respect to. but after a 1991 a you know the work that has to. busy from being more war and particularly the situation of lead. yeah. because love yeah. let's get a stand and then your i had made do you know the older countries worried about what would be their role in that you need for our award? so there is a, you know, the silence prayer that they would be, you know, 1st that's good, you know, concert, this kind of glitch on the left side. and then now these, the emerges of flight to china, russia, look, you know, most of you can begin to see it's probably, this is probably the birds of a new multi point. i wrote it and then they could have for an alternative to some

of standard securities. so that's, that's, that's where the situation nice. and then we will say, you know, there's like a stop that's, you know, they would be, yeah, they did this, the current situation, or if you need some naturalism and that sort of intervention wouldn't be, you know, cabbage. so that's why they russians, you know, the african countries start looking towards. so, russia, in china, at the moment, the influence is power. but sometimes there are efforts to conceal one's intentions . and perhaps that seem to have been the case in new delhi as a german vice child to arrive to promote great energy. but instead went on to push the country to choose a side and ukraine conflict and condemned russia despite india's continued neutrality. on the issue, i said read yesterday utils. and as of ongoing, i think is not come see the last on so. so i would be very, very glad and would even have it in our relation if and yeah,

if he's trying to key our language and say this as an aggressive, it's a one sided aggressive. it's put into for that for great hub. and while a robot how back took note of india is close relationship with russia. he didn't sis but new delhi take the side of the west and partners. india has refused to cave into pressure to adopt any sanctions against mosca was rupture. is one of its largest energy suppliers. that's good the opinion. now i've been doing historian capital they need something that asking for something that showed up on this sort of technology, this on of things to let them ask what they want they apply to get on sort of goods of pride for the jump. right? let me pull by what can you search for? what did you think victim gene did i do? do we have nothing to say because you see we got to go to horse street. yeah. so what we don't dictate what you have to see to make them say what they want to put

the dispute in what you have to do that a good good. i think they should realize this that they should look have read this. this shows that even the not do god face russia audits or that's why it is amazing. such a huge you know, that countries begging of that and they go through, they can do to give us the credit. that's right. they are doing it because they realized the bit calculations all calculations if on the draw they won't give a shit because i'll be blocking the field. it's been called a flagrant violation of international law. according to all, jerry is the minister of foreign affairs. he says, israel is decision to recognize the west and so hire a dispute at territory as part of morocco actually flies in the face of a un resolution of the matter. the decision constitutes

a flagrant violation of international law, un security council decisions, and general assembly resolutions on the western sahara question. the decision can in no way legitimize sovereignty over occupied sahara lands. it shows agreement between the occupiers policies and their complicity in violating international law and encroaches upon the legitimate rights of the palestinian people to establish their independent states with jerusalem as its capital and of the sorry people to self determination. the un does not consider western sahara to be a part of morocco. the region also known as the as a white, a republic, uh if that independence, 5 decades ago with classes breaking out between locals, american troops over the years. and we spoke with political analyst a how much cell he who says there's nothing surprising about israel stats. it is not kaiser and western side of the kaiser. we're supposed to have

a spot of the monroe and the self economy. so it would be very been interesting to see if, let's say, uh the slide is, what do the san for the westbank country. there's other, as you said, you know, this is how is riley politics function. it is based on uh, uh, a discrimination to allow us to create uh, it is based on the self interest. and uh, uh, the analogy. uh, i mean, when would have hoped that the same uh, commission would apply to the should use on the matter issue. the did it just independent states. uh, but, well, not bad yet. and i don't think that comes with restriction or would be able to move in that direction. so. all right, that's it for now though. thank you for joining us here. and i'll see international from the entire news team here at moscow. you can catch up on all of us stories on god, odyssey, telegraph of course,

on air. don't mind the the, [000:00:00;00]

the hello and welcome to cross stop were all things are considered. i'm beautiful about american voters are rarely interested in foreign policy during election cycles. that said, the issue of ukraine may be the exception this time round, particularly among g o. p voters, much of the republican base, a sour them ukraine policy. they see it as biden's war the to discuss these issues and more, i'm joined by my guest door to send you what are we in budapest, he's a pod cast or the goggle which can be found on youtube and locals. and in lisbon

week rustic, like morris is host of the redacted news podcasts and a former fox news baker. part, gentleman cross stock needs and the fact that needed to get him jumped any time you want. and i always appreciated right, george in budapest, it was very interesting how over the last few weeks out of the ukraine policies played out in the us presidential election. but having said that, a foreign minister lobrado said on the last new cycle, which i think is quite interesting said we know what we're fighting for. what is the bike and ministration fighting for? very, very good questions. as far as one can tell, is fighting for the right to keep the wall going in definitely um is doing good business for us as the manufacturers. and it's getting russians. honest. lindsey graham same is the best money i ever spent. you know, the reference of buying, so i is actually the only strategic objectives of it. is it possible to do some

on the case of uh, buy them. i mean, when it comes to the republicans office, they, uh, they're all the, the neo cons and there is donald trump and trump himself. however, as always, has been ambiguous. so, mean he's not quite sure. does he want to be the tough guy who's going to, you know, stand on the boat and bring this waterman and photos they want to be the piece? make a will finally. uh then, you know, be, deliver what everyone obviously wants. so he's bringing it both ways and this happened during his presidency with me. and when you tried to sit on 2 stools, trying to use a full in between the a, you know, cleaning. it's very interesting looking at the main stream media coverage of the conflict in your brain and it's, it's about 99.9 percent in one direction. but at the same time you have a lot of people. and if you look in the alternative media and the pod cast and whatnot is almost the reverse, there's in an enormous amount of skepticism in this skepticism is only getting more

intense as people actually learn more about the context of the conflict. your thoughts? i, i agree with you. i think that there's been an awakening when we were covering at the beginning of the war and drawing attention to this is not just started in february. this goes back many, many years. there's a lot of context here. let's talk about victoria newland. let's talk about all of the pieces under the obama administration that were put in place to get us to this point. the expansion of nato and people would say, no, no, you can't talk about that. we were banned and blocked and censored and taken off youtube and now being there. so what is that we, we, you know, you know how it goes, right? so you've, you've been expanded. now i think there's this awakening, this unfolding, and even just them on, i know anecdotes, right? really don't fly, but even like among friends who are sort of, well, maybe had, you know, ukrainian flags flying or, or, or pulled up in their, their, their twitter bios. you've seen

a removal of that. you've seen flags removed just even going around portugal, other parts of europe where you had all of the flags and subway stops and, and billboards. and everything had been removed. and i think there's a growing awareness, and i think it's starting to trickle into the main stream, and i'm encouraged by that. it's a i like when people become educated. yeah, yeah. but it's sometimes it's really hard to get it out there in charge. i mean, we, you, we could all be very skeptical here and take a step back. okay. so the bike and administration is for the war, overwhelmingly, the trump is against bite. and so support trump, you see what i mean, how it kind of plays that, that plays into that because it's clayton is mentioned, you know, the more you're educated about this, the more questions that are, that are brought up. but then there's also a political wedge issue. i'm against this because he's for it is i think there is part of that as well. george? yes. uh without question. and uh, and i think that's the problem. there's originally but with chrome and,

and his acolytes is that they're constantly attacking by them. but it's not clear always what are they attacking by them full because some of them are attacking buying but not doing, you know, do i have a ukraine? and and drum says what it wouldn't have happened if i were president because i was so top and you know, built in with the dad to do anything with me and, and so, so the difficulty however, is, i mean i, i agree with the weights and is that there is, the public perception of ukraine is very different from the perception of the foreign policy making. you lead the policy making your lead is absolutely gone home and supporting the ukraine. but because i think you've greenville, when they just want to go on bleeding, russia. 7 however, the public, as you know, as, as not being as soon as the last thing about the polls show that there's knowing susie, as a board isn't you know, no way that you see any demonstrations against russia. it's just costing

a lot of money. and i think that point is saving into people's consciousness to say we're spending all this money on the landscape. how come, you know, we go ahead and then, you know, there's no money, but this is no money by health care. and then what date with dental care, whatever, but does it promptly infinite amounts of money? but uh, as soon as gets the question, that is, how do we get this all kind of democratic accountability. so it's gonna be a public view. oh, we'll do back, we'll get to that with the war powers act, images, pay the past the send, the 2nd half of the program. i claim that i like it. george gave us a wonderful segue into the self destruction of mike pens by tucker carlson, which is very interesting is because, you know, as i said in my introduction, you know, much of the republican base is souring on this here, but not the leads. and this is one of the things that george and i have talked about a lot over ever since the conflicts started this iteration of meaning in february of last year. is that now we're seeing the real start difference between the

establishment and everybody else. well, it was interesting to watch tuckers is this the ration of a lot of these candidates over the past few days and you really, you're absolutely right about it. there's this dichotomy between the people in the audience and the sort of automaton sewer up on stage. mike, pen speaking we're, we're the perfect perfect robot, right? the neoconservative robot, and i think one interesting narrative emerged when you watched all of those interviews. it was this idea of we can walk and chew gum at the same time. and so they're having this very narrow debate right now. biden is too slow to get, gets into ukraine. we would do it more quickly. and that's literally the spider. yeah, that's the spectrum, you know, and, and so there is no daylight at all between democrats and republicans. but you have this audience sitting there saying, wait a minute, why are we sending billions of dollars into this vacuum cleaner? that's ukraine. why are we doing this?

when our bridges are collapsing in the united states? when we have a fit? no crisis pouring across our borders when people can't afford their rent and they're working harder for less money is the us dollar continues to be the value. so i, it's amazing to watch this disconnected, but georgia definitely right. there is an absolute thirst for continuing the military industrial complex in the united states and just follow the money. and all of those mansions that pop up around washington dc. they're all fueled by the military industrial complex and defense contractor. so the money is just pouring into washington d. c. and then of course, you'll have this, you will hear in next week. and the military industrial complex will make even more money. once that disclosure project comes out, they'll make trillions instead of billions, you know, charge. it was interesting that nikki haley, let me see, might not have been obliterated, but you certainly learnt or less than from mike pence. ok, meeting,

she does doesn't really say anything subsystem she never has before. why should we expect it now? but the what the, the, the, the tucker interviews showed. it least if you, if you're interested in the topic of the, there are red lines there. people have certain limits and they don't like being lied to. okay, so it's for democracy. uh, okay, how did, why are their elections going on in ukraine? okay. well, it's about transparency. why can't you have an audit of all the money that's going? they're excited people. you know, people don't like to be treated as it is if they're children. yeah. then the question, and it's was very striking that the in the 2016 when the trump um, what is this array to is full of his or republican opponents. he did it by