to daylight at all between democrats and republicans. but you have this audience sitting there saying, wait a minute. why are we sending billions of dollars into this vacuum cleaner? that's ukraine. why are we doing this? when our bridges are collapsing in the united states? when we have a fit, know, crisis pouring across our borders, when people can't afford their rent and they're working harder for less money is the us dollar continues to be the value. so i, it's amazing to watch this disconnect. but georgia definitely right. there is an absolute thirst for continuing the military industrial complex in the united states and just follow the money. and all of those mansions that pop up around washington dc. they're all fueled by the military industrial complex and defense contractor. so the money is just pouring into washington d. c. and then of course, you'll have this you a full here and next week. and the military industrial complex will make even more money. once that disclosure project comes out, they'll make trillions instead of billions of you know, judge,

it was interesting. the has a, nikki haley, me see, might not have been obliterated, but she certainly learned her lesson from mike pence. ok meeting. she does, doesn't really say anything subsystem she never has before. why should we expect it now? but the, what the, the, the, the tucker interviews showed in least if you, if you're interested in the topic of the, there are red lines. there people have certain limits and they don't like being like, i like to, okay. it's for democracy. uh, okay. so then why are their elections going on in ukraine? okay. well, it's about transparency. why can't you have an audit of all the money that's going? they're excited people, you know, people don't like to be treated as it is if they're children. yeah. then the question, and it's was very striking that the, in the 2016 when the trump, um, what if this are a to,

is all of his or republican opponents. he did it by a very clear, unambiguous messages and we will like to about the rock. thank you. absolutely. it was a comb job that and and you went further, you said that they knew it was a con job. those people who, you know, the, that's the thousands of americans are on them because they lied to the american public and everyone assumed, well, this is the end of trump, you know, you know, he, he, gals survivors and he's the republican vote to seal the deal. yeah. you're absolutely right. we will lied to. and this was in south carolina, you know, where you're the home of all the veterans. yeah. so you're actually right. the people want, you know, the truth still. and the, and they told that everything that they've been told about ukraine about zalinski has been lies. and uh, and that is, that isn't any build. and that also explains dr. carson's notice recommendation. i mean, he's standing among the republican. it is extraordinary. and topic also has been

the one person on the main stream media who has been absolutely outspoken on the, the subject of the ukraine. yeah. because he's not afraid. he's not afraid. everybody else has put into a pos you're being afraid of going to i find a bobby kennedy junior, this position on this very interesting to. so you have a, obviously he's not the frontrunner in the democratic primary because there isn't a democratic primary. but i mean, he is prominent within the party and he'll to alternative media. he's very, very popular now, like in the main screen here, but it's very interesting. you have a bobby kennedy junior in trump, maybe not saying the same things, but both being skeptical, hosting skeptical and both being marginalized, uncensored and blocked by the mainstream media. and it's amazing to watch when they say something, what you're allowed, then to cover in the mainstream press or to have again,

youtube censoring videos blocking uh, shutting down entire channels because of what bobby kennedy junior has to say. i don't agree with him on, on everything at all, but i think when you have a candidate who's willing and afraid to come out and say, you know, why are we doing this? i won't, he says i'm gonna shut down all the military bases around the world. do you ever think they're going to let him become president of the united states? when he says that i'm going to dismantle the military industrial complex. i'm going to take and shut down these military base as i did with my wife and the how can i stay there quite, and how can you say that you're going to feel the comment on? isn't that a comment on the, on the um, the scituate patient of democracy in america, you just said they'll never allow him to do that? well, i, well, what happened to the democratic process? yeah, i mean, that's beside, i think we're now really seeing through this facade that the, it's the money, it's the donors. all you need to do is go back seen these nuggets of bernie sanders . right when, when m. s. n b c produced theirs and whistle blowers and m. s. nbc came forward and

admitted that they were told that they were not allowed to put bernie sanders on television right then even in their graphics that they had on their screen when they showed who's the core, the candidates running for president. right now, it was interesting to see in, you know, andrew yang and other people removed from the graphic and they had comma la harris on there who was pulling lower than bernie sanders. why? so she's pulling lower your bernie sanders who's winning, but you can't have him on the show. you can't do the man. i have to go to a hard break here. i'm going to jump in here. we're going to go have a hard break. and after that hard, great, we'll continue our discussion state the

more expensive and i'm here to plan with you. whatever you do, do not watch my new shelf. seriously. why watch something that's so different little opinions that he won't get anywhere else. welcome to please do the have the state department, c i a weapons, bankers, multi 1000000000 dollar corporations. choose your facts for you. go ahead, change and whatever you do. don't want my show stay main street because i'm probably going to make you uncomfortable. my show is called stretching time, but again, it's not, we don't want to watch it because it might just change the way inside the a. welcome back, across stuff where all things are considered either val, this is a home addition to remind you were discussing some real news,

the george in budapest year in the last new cycle. we had other senate rejects congressional powers over nato, article 5, and it was a vote of it losing 16 to 83. we ended the pro 1st part of the problem talking about the democratic process. now we're talking about trashing the constitution. is it someone else's? another country is security needs trends, the security needs of the united states and part of the constitution. what exactly is a bit of a brass bull, hasn't they've the prop, uh, democratic uh, observation that, you know, optical 5 of the nose advances treated does not trump the us call seduce the decisions about going to will i'm determined by congress and by the us present the

not determined by nature, but this is where, you know, the american, the political elite is of no, no, no, you know, we, we've gone, discuss that. we have to be binding on articles live is binding on it. but of course, we were told many times the article vibe doesn't say that you automatically go through. but even when you look at the north atlantic treaty good makes clear that you're only other obligated to go to walk in circumstances as long as your in conformity with 0 nations laws and the constitution. and so they accept theme in the north atlantic treaty, except that every nation has to follow its own laws and its own constitution, but it is a measure of how far america is the generated. because there was a time when they were senators who expressed discomfort with the

united states joining nato, the senators who are expressing discomfort over the expansion of major the was a debate. i mean, wasn't much of a debate, but the list of what strong debates in the ninety's about expanding nato. now, i mean, other than rand, full and even he, that is been rather weak. but you know, other than rampal, there's no one was a pay where the hell is the america. you dragging of the americans into? yeah, well, in judge georgia, in our podcast to discuss the great length with article one of the treaty is, which has never mentioned meaning, don't look, always refer, resort to diplomatic means to resolve conflicts here with claims. what is there, what is the reason why i brought this up in? it's something a trend that i have been observing for a long time. you're in lisbon. you're in portugal. and uh, you know, we've seen how the e u is subsumed itself to nato because, you know,

it breaks it. um, you know, the, the, uh, the case a back door back into europe is really a european union. but when it's assumed under nato, and the what's called versus just codified exactly the same thing. i got you, i found this article on anti war dot com. i mean, i didn't see it in the main street. i would have missed it completely if i hadn't gone to alternative media claim. well, you're, i think you're hitting the, the nail on the head, which is what it. well, george did to is what is happening to united states. you're literally, you're literally taking away american sovereignty and you're turning it over to this global on elected body. and it really gets you off the hook. we're seeing it at the world economic forum level, we're seeing at the world health organization level. so the, you know, under a pandemic treaty, what happens? well, the united states government is irrelevant. it's this on elected body that gets to decide with the future of these countries. and i think this is, i know there's all this chatter and talk about this unit polar order versus

a multi polar order, but i really think it is actually, this is the, this is the future. this is the debate right now. do we want to give up sovereignty to these large organizations that do not have the interest of the sovereign powers at heart? and so in the visual countries, whether it's in netherlands and having other farmers, you know, lots of their, you know, thousands of farms because of something that is drawn up in brussels or the united states pandemic policy is something that's drawn up by the world health organization or why are we sending so many billions of dollars into this cauldron that's destroying the united states. but all of these questions are not being asked by people in washington dc. you're right, ran paul, maybe the only one that was asking that question and then he's even bent over and allowed these things to past. oh there's no, there's no audit of the amount of money we're sending there. yeah, i asked for it. well, i guess i didn't get it. okay, i won't hold it up anymore. let's just push it through. so weak is

a great way to describe it, and it's really, really troubling. the sentence rejection. you know, this constitution over the, over this i, i'm really what i'm really worried about where we go from here and how much will you see the, the united states senate just had to finally announce that we're no longer at warner rack. after 20 years we, we have to literally, when we even announce a war, when did we actually actually put, when did congress approval war? is there somebody like it? is it but the with the recent vote in and go to george right now they will, they will they even refuse to a, from the constitution physics showing. yeah. they don't affirm the parameters and the sovereignty, but can use that word of the come see, they refused to do that. that's extraordinary. never happened in almost done this quite a while quite strongly. i remember a few days ago, they also had a vote, and it was, i think, some congressmen who had a stipulate as

a condition of more money for ukraine, that the by them is ration come to congress and explain each strategy. what is it trying to achieve? and if it doesn't come and explain what he's trying to achieve, then they'll be no more money. and that was opposed also voted down. so you can, you, alexis politicians who presumably are elected in order to oversee the patropolis spending over the taxpayers money saying don't mamma we, we don't want to do that yet. you don't have to come to us. you don't have to explain how your, how you're spending all money. and that's the same thing with the old and that are we, we don't want to do it. we trust you, you that all this money it is, you know, 100 bill in 200000000000. who knows how much money has been spent? yeah, it's whole being spent perfectly appropriately. we do with the tool that they need an audit of donald trumps businesses in new york city. yes. that's the key. exactly . yeah. that's the most important stuff. right? yeah, yeah. the yeah that, that, that, that's really important. but what you're doing with taxpayers money i,

you just go ahead and keep doing what you're doing. you know, clinton, one of the things that i find really bothers and that we shouldn't be surprised is that we will all of this. remember that from the to war and the rack and the same strategy is being used even though the new york said we lose our less of the watch deal. we weren't or less. we, you know, we won't be, we won't fall for this again. but they are because the b, u. nato is phone is a supposed to be a defense of military organization so that you'd be talking about geo political positioning and security. but it's transcended that into a, a, a crusade, a crusade of the west, you mounted joseph morales, you know, the garden, they know all of this year. it is, it security is really kind of an after thought here. because, you know, the whole idea of security during the cold war in the sense is being the visibility of security for all we are no longer in that we, we, you know, we, we got untethered from that. okay. and, and as long as we're untethered from that,

we're going to be living and autonomy to be in tennis insecurity. you know, by the way, facing, is watching. and that's a great point. it's a question i've asked for years when people would say to me, well this is for you when you hear the rhetoric from george w bush and, and all of them. and dick cheney and others, this is making us safer. that by going into a rack, you know, tie a yellow ribbon around a tree. and in america, this is making us the safer. i mean, my brother was in baghdad. so during the gulf war and i mean how, how we saved for was our security improved here. in the united states, by invading and destabilizing the middle east. like please explain that to me. i'd love to hear how that works. how are american troops in syria stealing syrian oil, providing security for the united states, and then shipping it to a rack? how i was sending hundreds of billions of dollars into ukraine, making people in iowa safer. please explain. i would love to hear how these drivers

right now could even go further. how is it actually helping ukraine? george? i mean, they, uh, you know, i've done my program, you know, you know, oh well, um we, they, us should stay in a rack and i've always, it didn't, we help them and, you know, maybe we should stop helping these be boys. they as these lead say, because the more a that is being sent to, to ukraine, the longer the more, the more people dine in, the smaller you frame gets. if it's absolutely the, there's a, you know, in x or it will cause and effect that the more money that pulls in, the more native they get, the more a countries destroyed. i mean, what's happened, the ukraine, i mean, is just the risk of it. but what happens to the syria? i mean, it will not happen. have obama not going on with this brilliant idea to affect regime change? you know, i saw was go before that. oh god, i don't see months ago, you know, look what happened in the, in libya look, was having

a 0 and then it goes in that same wonderful year in 2011 and they said, you know, they had the sali and human most goes, although haven't got that war in yemen has been, goes up to the total devastation of the country of the country, and certainly hasn't done anything for the united states. but it's just the distorted the many, you know, i'm obviously go back to one of the george w bush's wars. and this is really the legacy of nature and even even going beyond what was, i mean, the game pack that he's had in this been your, a little, the divisiveness and you know, they, they, his theory. it was overwhelmed. many countries easier. but you know, basically have had quite a peaceful life. it wasn't, there wasn't any of this at the ethnic complex. the they, they are terrible political bits. and this will, does now emerged in a country out in bulk area and romania molto. but all of that is, is effect the, is an effect of a us and they do expansion. know, you know,

the george dave who are really good letting me a menu of failed, of foreign policy became changed the claim where we already have one minute left here. but the difference is a big difference. this time you go to the, the u. s. is leading the collective west against a nuclear power called russia. that's a big difference. don't you think one minute? absolutely. it is. and i think you're, you're witnessing why they're continuing to push for, you know, saying well, no nuclear power, nuclear weapons that's off the table. so we're running up against this wall. okay, so then we're gonna play underneath that nuclear threshold. we're going to play our little game in our little garden, expanding nato, and all of these additional countries. and funneling as much money as we can to the expansion of nato, and we're saying we're out of weapons. now, i'll continue. we're out of weapons. so you know what? we need to ramp up on a war footing. you heard this in britain, you heard this last week in washington. we need to go to a war footing now. what does that mean while we're out of weapons now? so we need to expand within these parameters, more javelins, more patriot missiles,

more jets, expansion expansion expansion. what happens in natal being a defensive organization? yeah, well it at the expense of health care and education in the border security and all of that claim. it was wonderful having you on and what i think my guess and lisbon and in budapest and one's like our viewers are watching us. here are the see next time remember prospect was the features they asked as of today because there's a lot of folks censorship on many topics in schools that start to just the migration topic. to my impression it went on this atomic change call me back. it's fine to understand them a call. you see it's, i mean, there was no, there was no way of debate. it was, i don't know, that's never as and now it's about russia and it's about yes,

we have to find russia and russia has to be taken off the map, the stuff for the summer shift for the picture such as you the vehicle, is it the economic model have us the kinds of what it means, different experiments you if it's doesn't figure to testify this thing and say ok, then you must sort of deal with the compliance. the mortgage goes up developing bio chemical weapons inside of the

guns. good. to watch the news move in a solution, you know was when she to use the white glove to send it to the customer, our physical bodies because of the center state the fabric. sanchez, i've been doing this for 30 years and 2 languages around the world. i'm here in the united states interviewed for president's work and for the us as major television networks, i believe there should be honest, direct, and impactful the show is called direct impact. the

so somebody happened in america recently that made a lot of people in the united states take notice. in fact there were people even in different parts of the world who seem to take notice as well. so what happen? this fox news host, tucker carlson. we have now learned is going to be leaving the fox news network. one of the company's top post tucker carlson is now out. folks, news says it's policy and company with tucker costs and one of its most popular. i'm controversial presenting costs and hosted his last show this past friday. tucker carlson, suddenly no longer with cable news guy at fox news. why does that matter? i'll tell you what matters. it matters because he was the network's most watched. personality with the most watched news show. so why would they then let him go

when you ask? because and that's how cable news works. and as good as tucker's ratings were very something he maybe did not know about this business of ours. here. let me do this. let me take you through my own journey of how i came to know this secret about cable news that few, including my friend tucker, seem to not understand. it's really more about what they don't understand about the people who run the cable news companies. people like fox news owner, rupert murdoch here, let me take you back. i once had a conversation with a man who made murdock his billions of dollars. none other than roger is practically invented. fox news on the notion that america needed to have a conservative news network. so roger and i were friends,

and we used to talk quite regularly one day during one of those conversations. i remember i asked him, i asked roger rails who was building up and i can't build up fox news. why? he fired a particular host that day. despite the fact that she was quite popular. his answer tomorrow. he said to me, we'll just put somebody else there and nothing is going to change. they're watching her. they're watching us. they're watching fox news. that's what roger said, what do you mean by that? seeing what he meant by that is something that i found about the hardware. in my own case, is he like tucker, i want to show that was highly rated. in fact, it was often the highest rated show on cnn one day to my astonishment and disappointment. they fired me just like the same way. they fox just fired tucker girls. and as i sat there trying to figure out why they would fire me,

even though i had some of the highest ratings and the networks history. i remember the words of both roger rails and somebody else. jim walton st. jim walton was the president of cnn world wide who i worked for, i guess it was my boss right at the very top. and he and i also, i used to have frequent conversations including one where i found myself in mr. walton's office. i was feeling pretty good about myself because i was, well, i was sure that my show's ratings were ok. rick's list at the time my show was beating fox news ad m as nbc and the ratings. i was hoping for a pad on the back one instead. mr. walton says this to me is the presidency of them . he says, look here and cnn wreck. we don't care about ratings, they just don't matter. we don't make money off of our ratings. we make money off of subscriptions. yep. that's the secret. the cable news. it's not about what people watch. it's not even an exercise in democracy. really.

it's not even so much about journalism, really anymore. it's a business, it's a business, and the business is about clearance. you say once a channel, like fox or cnn, are guaranteed a place on directv and comcast and dish and verizon. they've made it. they really don't have to do much else. they have 100000000 subscribers before they even open their mouths. that is what i eventually came to understand. and that's what tucker maybe didn't understand. then again, maybe he did. maybe he knew that on cable news, you can challenge the status quote, but he did it in a way or maybe that that and that the dominion lawsuit is what really got him fired. because after all, his writings, as i learned from not one but 2 of the biggest names in cable news,

in terms of executives told me, ratings they just don't matter. and joining me now is uh, sabrina sal body. she's a, she's the cause of the revolutionary blackout network. and sabrina, thank you so much for joining us. i'm going to start with what your reaction was. the moment you heard that the fox news ad uh, essentially fired. it's the most popular and highest rated anchor in tucker crossing to. yeah, so i think for me, i was very much surprised. i didn't understand where fox news would hire a would fire one of their basically their top show i. so that was really interesting to me, but then i figured it must have something to do with something that he's been discussing on that show. more of the anti war, a rhetoric he's had, voices come on like armada and jimmy door that are anti war. and i wondered if that

was the reason why they decided to remove tucker cross. and so i really felt like it was the content that you probably discussed that they felt was a little too far for, for their audience. you know, i've been reading a lot and i mentioned those moments ago is i was setting this conversation between me and you of that. a lot of people don't understand the cable news does sound like it's money off of ratings. people that, oh my god, why would they do that? he has a, has, they don't care about ratings. they don't care about ratings. they make their money off subscriptions. it's a business. they're guaranteed, 800000 subscriber. pardon me? a 100000000 subscribers a year between directv and comcast, etc, etc. so what do they have? one guy doing, uh, you know, uh, 3 dot 3000000 viewers or another guy doing 2500000 viewers. it's kind of all the same to them, to business. it's not a, it's not an editorial news model like it used to be. that's right,

and i can imagine they'll probably be more changes over there or fox. i mean, we saw seeing and go through a re shuffle of sorts. they have a new manager that came in and decided to change the content on cnn and say that they're not just gonna focus on the liberal audience. they're also going to focus on the conservative audience as well. and we saw that with that trump town hall. so i think there are shift happening and mainstream media. i think part of that has to do with the fact that since joe bought in one of the presidential election, our viewers have dropped off off from mainstream media. trump did give them a lot of a lot of readings and a lot of support. so i think that they're trying to move the ball in different places to see what can bring more viewers back. but i think the reason my viewers are leaving, but by the way, let me just stop you with the trump. the truck was a circus. so everybody wanted to go and watch the start because they wanted to be in the big top. they wanted to buy tickets to watch a circus, and that's essentially what, what trump represents. and if that's why ratings were up, that's why ratings were, were rob, i, i,

i don't think it's necessarily that the business is changing. based on the guy who's in office. i don't think there's any difference between trump and obama, and biden, or any other president of the united states because the policies are essentially the same. and the business interests which have clenched fists with those policies . and the government are the ones that are really mandating what we watch or what we get on these cable channels. i think i, i leave it to you. you say what? i think people are starting to seek out independent media. i think they're tired of hearing the same narrative that you get from the state department and i think that they are starting to question things more.