age, the economy, a lot of people are still struggling right now. the gas prices, depending on what state you live in, the gas prices are still high for some of us. then there's the price is that the grocery store food is still expensive. this inflation that we're dealing with. so people are saying that more so people who are not left this have said this to me as well. they're saying now that like wait a minute, i'm paying what? $8.00 for a carton of eggs and the by the administration has continued to send billions of dollars to another country. so i think more people are starting to make that connection. i think that's the difference when you compare it to iraq. you know, it's interesting what you just said about left. i don't even know what the hell is the less than what the hell is the right anymore, because it seems like they've just somehow merged and found this place in the middle. in fact, you could make the argument that if the democratic party represents the left, which it certainly represents a lot more than the republican party represents the left that it's the left today in america that is promoting and supporting these raising expensive,

endless wars. like what we're now saying, developing a new credit. well, i wanna, i wanna clear something here because a lot of people say that the democratic party is left. the democratic party is not left. are those are liberals. they still lead center, right? so i just want to make the distinction there, left, this are people who consider themselves to be progressive. people who are left of the democratic party, people like myself, we're the ones. yeah. now listen i, i get that as a way to a hold on. i get that and god love you for saying that, and i think you're making an important point that there's a true distinction between, you know, the institutional formalized that the establishment, which is maybe the best word democratic party and left us. but my point is, you certainly couldn't say republicans are left to scan, you know, you to not. yeah. so if you have to go down to specter between who's closer to the left that across are closer to the left. so i agree with what you say by the way,

that they're not necessarily representing a left point of view, which i think is what you're saying. right? right. i mean, they're calling for censorship now, like this is ridiculous. you have people who are politicians, who i thought were suppose to be progressive, like amc calling for censorship. calling for the silence of voices that she disagrees with their people who tend to criticize her. this is a problem. any time that you have, people like marjorie taylor green is calling for anti censorship and just calling to stops and in the money to ukraine. that's supposed to be the perspective that comes from the left. yes, i think it happened when we come back. i want to ask you a little bit about the, the specific things that, that tucker has said and done in recent weeks prior to his being well, he supposedly resigned, but as we all know, he was fired. he was let go and that's the truth of it. you stay right there,

sabrina, i look forward to talking to you on the other side of the break. by the way, i should tell you, i have a pod cast where i as a journalist as a latino and as an entrepreneur or tell my story and share it with you. i also talk about what we learned about the stories that we talked about on this show. it's called rick sanchez podcast. i invite you to check it out when we come back more on the firing of tucker crossing and what uh, what really meets stay with the of a hungry this being a member of the european union and nato since 1999 during the 1st post. so good

wave of nato's eastwood expansion. none of the sailors cuz of this the main longest thanks is dylan. my property that i see like that. uh by now. uh as a country it's a e. so me that me it if so we get that actual zap i did do my i just bought the pre show is that am yeah, still more than the beach but i see, but i see us play up by choice, some of which is on the way in the early ninety's hungry was a country with the west view of russia to day started go disagreements left over from the soviet union. and the why do you know what and you some of them, i don't know what to tell them. what i see if you look at somebody in the compared to police report more than those, what i see is great. and i did as a, it's a police degree though as much was the

best pieces they asked as of today because there's a lot of that censorship on many topics in schools that start to just the recreational topic, to my impression. it depends on this atomic change, gone back, it went almost send them a call. you see, it's, i mean, there was no, there was no way of debate. it was either or the s. and now it's about russia and it's about, yes, we have to fight russia and russia has to be taken off the map the i say, welcome back. i'm gonna sanchez, you know, there's something else that's been happening of life regarding what we know and the firing of the truck across. and remember, question was, fox is most the wind, you know, most highly rated, most companies breaking host, for example, we have the compunction, if not the temerity, the question,

our country's foreign policy. something these days seems for been an american establishment. media outlets. it is perhaps for that very reason that fox is getting a lot of heat now for firing cross and went back once again talking to uh, sabrina sal body. she coasts savvy sides thats her podcast and its a darned good one. and she has a very unique way of looking at the, the politics of our time, which obviously today is very much in and mixed with the news. and the editorial decisions of our time not bigger, more recently than what happened to tucker carlson where he was just off a sudden told one morning hey, don't come to work, you're fired. it was a complete shock to him. he was totally surprised. i know tucker, as you know, tuckers had me on a show many times and he, and i've talked a lot over the years, i would consider him almost a friend because you know, in this business, i don't know how close you have you. we are having those, but he did,

he did get by you're in this hey, dominion lawsuit. and he did something which was quite interesting. he was actually uh heard, or i guess written on tags where he said about donald trump. i hate him. i hate him passionately. and ask for the argument that donald trump had lost the election. he called, he said it was essentially a joke. and that, you know, he was embarrassed having to put that story on the air because he didn't think there was an a trip to it. yet. he was going on the air and that saying those things essentially promoting donald trump and promoting the, the story about the election being a fraudulent. so that didn't come to his credibility. did it not? so i would say, so i think a big part of the problem is you know, in network network news, you have to do what the producers want you to do,

or you lose your seat and they'll replace you with someone else, you know, but i couldn't imagine going on air almost every other night. promoting a donald trump promoting something that i really despise. so i would say that tucker was a good actor in, in reference to that. but i think that this is something that what does that say? but what does that say, what, what does that say? and you know, okay, tucker was doing that because for some reason he figured the read calculation was not to go on the or and criticized drop. so he defended trump on the air, though privately he would tell his friends donald trump's audience and on the air he defended the election square foot whole. but privately he said, this is bullcrap and he did that. do you think they all do? that is, i wouldn't, i wouldn't be surprised. i really wouldn't. i wouldn't be surprised if there's commentators of cnn or m as in b. c. that are not too keen on joe biden, but they have to read the script that they're given. they have to come on there and do their job. that's the thing is like they are trying to sell an image. they're

trying to sell a certain types of politics. they're trying to support the state department on narrative, and that really is their job. i just wish more americans realize that. do you think uh, here's where the rubber meets the road, or it's not so much what the, the editorial is, where the bosses and cnn are on a semi see or fox or anywhere what they think. right. it's not your executive producer, it's the people who are set on board rooms who want to make sure that the entity stays whole. so why would i do a story on, for example, the fact that politicians have to take bribes legal bribes so that they can have campaign funds so that they can then run for office when those campaign funds are then fed into cnn, and fox and tv to do commercials. so if i was to go on there and tell the truth,

which is almost every politician in the united states is taking a legal bride. and politicians are being paid off every day by giant corporations. right. but because that money goes back to cnn and back to fox and backed them as nbc in the form of advertising, they're not going to talk about it. and they're not them and criticize it. that's just one example. that was so sort of businesses determining the editorial slant of the news. unfortunately, this is how it works and that's why people have to look at who owns these companies, where the shareholders that are invested in these networks. you really have to trace it back and see if you look at a company like black rock or via gartner states state street. yeah. they're shareholders in the media space. and this is really important for people to understand. so the people that you see on the screen, they are merely just a pop it like they don't really have get the opportunity to say their real opinion . you know, this is why they were so critical against someone like bernie sanders because to

bring him on the network and to hear him say, the billionaires are the problem. well, that doesn't sit well with the people who are on the board of the network. you know, so of course they're going to some your, someone like it, you know, it's interesting in the case of tucker, once again, he really played it. he played both sides against the middle because he knew foxes audience is very old and white and male. right? so the great for ponder and of foxes audience probably between 80 and 90 percent are white. the man's, um certainly white. uh and the males pretty high as well. right. so he knew that he had to play a certain argument for them. and that's why tucker, when it came to the traditional arguments from the right, which i'm sorry, tends to be a little on the anti immigrant side. pardon me, i'm an immigrant, but you're not gonna hear fox news advocating for the rights of latinos in the

united states. or african americans for that matter, not a friendly pace, better find the place for that audience. tucker knew how to continue that rhetoric so to speak. but he gave a more. he didn't just and there he didn't just do you know what a riley and how did he do, which is just play down the middle to the republican talking points. he stayed on some republicans having boards, but then took them out of their holding talking points, like you said, with the situation in the ukraine which, which was a tomato strategy. i've never seen anybody else do that on any network, which is i'll give you some of what i think you want, right? i'll give you your, your, your, your, uh, your dessert for lack of a better word or description. but you know what, here's your spinach and you're going to learn this. and by doing that he actually was leading the conservative cause toward trying to straighten out our foreign policy greeting debacle. that it is no. yeah, i would say so i think, you know,

he's trying to show again he was trying to give them what they want, but at the same time kind of slowly walk them to where they should be headed. and i think that's not easy to do. i don't think a lot of commentators do that. they usually tend to be one sided, one way or the other, but i said this when when tucker was, was fired. i said tucker, crossing can start a youtube channel tomorrow and probably already have a 1000000 subscribers. a lot of people like to listen to them and not just conservative their democrats. they used to watch like talk across and show. so i think people have to understand whatever he was doing. it was engaging in a way that people wanted to turn in and watch him. do you think? what do you think killed the? i mean, 1st of all, we should know. he doesn't need to do anything because he's a swanson air and that means he is, you know, rich beyond anyone's wildest imaginations. and if he didn't want to work another day in his life, he didn't have to. however, i do believe like most of us, but he has an ego that needs to be fulfilled and he wants to be famous that he

wants to be on the tv. and he will be well, according to the law mosque, he's supposed to do a show on twitter. yeah, so this should be interesting. i'm not sure how that would work out, but i think people will tune into twitter to see like tucker, because a lot of people like him is going to be different. i think this is a whole shift in the platform. apparently they're gonna allow people to subscribe to the show as well. so we'll see what happens and maybe more people may go that way. 100000000 people, a 100000000 people watched tuckers blurb on twitter announcing that he was going to be creating a show on that format. 100000000. think about that. do, do, do you know fuckers everybody gets excited about ratings, but cable news readings are actually pretty small. tucker on a good day, had 3000000 people watching. and in terms of the demo,

or what we call the $25.00 to $54.00 audience, which is the audience that matters. this audience was relatively tiny compared to the population of the united states, maybe 500000, not a good day, maybe, maybe 6, maybe 4. who knows? i mean, that's basically what the numbers were in a country of 350000000 people. it's not a huge, not now a 100000000. that's a big not. what does that say? yeah, more people have gone away from cable to be honest with you like the a lot of people i know don't have a cable subscription, haven't had one in years. their streaming services, so more people have like, especially my generation netflix, hulu. uh, but everybody, uh, for the most part, my generation is on twitter. so twitter, again, like the social media sites. youtube is another one that a lot of people are more willing to watch than cable. so i think again, i think the days of just like cable news, either they're going to have to do something drastically different to engage a new audience,

particularly your younger audience. or they're just going to fade away. sabrina saw body of my uh, my thanks to you. the host of, uh, savvy sab, you can capture broadcast on uh, the uh, revolutionary blackout network. and uh, and she's out there and we think are for us taking some time to uh to have this lively conversation with us today about the tucker carlson firing or lack of a better term or maybe using the most correct term. thanks again. sabrina. thank you. hey, before we go, i want to remind you of our mission here. it's simple, really. i want the silo, the world gotta stop living in these little boxes truths. don't live in boxes. they're everywhere. commer sanchez and i'll be looking for you again right here for help to provide a direct impact the

the the after the knobs easy power in italy, states foreign policy became extremely aggressive. benito mussolini needed glorious victory. he decided to achieve his ambitions in africa. despite the fact that formally libya had become and i tell you and call any back in 191212 as territories of this country were not actually controlled by rome. the nazis decided to put an end to this. but as soon as the religious order of this genocide stood in their way, the arabs did not want to submit to foreign power and bowed up stairs, resistance, dividers against colonialism,

were led by the seats of the senate side order. omar l move star, who was nicknamed the lion of the desert for his incredible courage. despite the violent, bombardments and voice and gas usage, mass deportations, and the imprisonment of the local population and concentration camps, the invaders could not cope with the arrow patriots for a decade. in 1931, omar l move star was captured and sentenced a hanging at the trial, the hero of the libyan people behaved very bravely and rejected. pardon. pursuing a policy of genocide, italy was only able to temporarily suppress libya, 18th of the entire population. more than 100000 people fell victim to their. however, just a few years later, the entail you enroll, collapsed. in 1951, libya became one of the 1st countries in africa to gain independence.

the, the, the take a fresh look around there's a life kaleidoscopic, isn't just a shifted reality distortion by power to division with no real opinions. fixtures designed to simplify will confuse who really wants a better wills, and is it just because it shows you fractured images, presented as fast?

can you see through their illusion going underground? can the i'm so sorry. is this how the russian differs the fee confirmed upcoming level will correspond to why you put in clumps of on the several police in the, in the shipping. the why i am going to come through to get around with the crowd present in the various to the need to be comes that otherwise flashes out as a rush pro, putting the black c d a load on being filed, the you and i the going under the agreement, bleach africa, despite the initial find fault discipline, go find on the face of the people, protested,

is swedish officials for both go. i think the event even put a put on the truly innovative ideas i coming from or other ordinary palestinians family living in this house behind me in the south of gaza was just a little bit of an investment. they say that projects can save lives, big with their little, these one, finding the robots to help fall on save for the air is i'm to find survivors in the very well well, come to you from inside of the international news soon. we're coming to you live from us. now let's take a look at what's on. so is this our latest news just in here in most of the schools of people have been reported and vice golden rule to jew to a bus pipe at the seas of shopping center in moscow. another 20,

the board of main trucks in the building because of the electrical shutting down that will bring you more details as they come in. and to a breaking news story, also russia and war correspondent, most as a general rule of has been killed in you claim showing that i also left several of his colleagues in good as about noon ukrainian units launched an artillery attack on a group of journalists from these vista news agency and the re, i know of us the news agency for preparing reports on ukraine's artillery, showing of settlements in this upper rose your region with cluster munitions. as a result of a strike with cluster munitions for journalists were wounded in varying degrees of severity. around midday, on such as a group of just came under attack from ukrainian on forties. now we understand that they were traveling in a calling this out for roseville region where they had been investigating the

ukrainian use of costing munitions a cool face. controversial weapons are being supplied by the united states. now, the russian defense ministry has confirmed that those doing this came on to find themselves from the very cluster munitions that they were investigated to know a number of doing this. helping wounded, they were rushed to hospital and body sadly, as we heard, well, just love, a jewel of a real know boss, me will correspondence was killed in the attack on the number of others that have been wounded to varying degrees on the head of his upper rozier region has pay tribute to the wall correspondence. this young talented guys proves the truth from the very 1st day. it covered real life and this brushy region was on the front line more than once present the new men and military men and did not stand aside of civilians needed help to day he died at the hands of king of nonsense. i express my deepest condolences to his family and friends, cool through this whole place,

thought decision by the united states to supply the home to virtual cost of munitions on the closer scrutiny. but of course it is not the 1st time that you cried. new forces have attract john this uh we heard uh most recently the assassination attempt to the parts to til the head of our team all got a to simon. yeah. and that was on covered by uh, the russian intelligent services. no of sterile coals, perhaps most notoriously, due, gonna was killed in a call bomb explosion in moscow. now the geneva convention protects during the so to attack them is i will kind bucks. many of these many such attacks like this and the killing of wounding and targeting of gen, this has a post without remark without comment from many of the weld press freedom organizations, which is perhaps on surprising considering the largest of those of generally funded by the us state department, us side and the national endowment for democracy. of course. well king, it was a,

is a dangerous occupation, but many of those are being targeted outside of the was own. and that helped by the mood for its uh website, which is essentially a kill it. so you craning killing is what it is hosted in langley, virginia, which is the home of the a c i. but once again, we can see that the friday and forces are simply ignoring international law as they continue to act with impunity. only a small allowance of the go and explore the mute button under the blank seat initiative and literally use the countries most in need allows the claim was on be made at the un security council. the same altima moscow has repeatedly made in the past, according to you in that around the 53 percent of export

and the brakes, the deal. this is going to to low income countries, why i income countries get at around 45 percent. and there is that need to income states. the un security council can beamed, and many countries spoke prior to russia speaking a lot of the allegations were level. and as we're reaching towards the end of the meeting for a number of security council members of spoken, we heard deputy and passengers, dimitri pull yancey. then go ahead and get bach. many of the fingers that were pointed at rush and many allegations that were made here, some of what he said, we might, we listen carefully to your statements. and we're again struck by the degree of cynicism of the western members of the security council. i have a question for you. what did you actually expect from the very 1st days we do everyone's attention to the fact that the initiative ceases to correspond to the originally stage of goals. however,

no steps have been taken to correct this trend. when we agree to the deal and heard calls to join forces for global security, we expected an end to discrimination on the part of western states which imposed unprecedented sanctions against us. actually trying to organize a blockade against our industries. the grain deal was important, not in our interest, but in the interest of the countries of the world that are most in need. now, throughout the meeting, the allegation was repeated. that blame was solely on the shoulders of russia for the great brain deals failure. and now, when the russian deputy ambassadors spoke, he pointed out the rush, it was willing to restore the deal if you brain with the oldest and of the bargain in the brush. i had extend of the deal many times. now, it was important to note that china spoke up and showed the not the whole world seems to by end of this logic, and that they do indeed understand like other forces around the world understand

that is greenville is a 2 way a street rather than a one way street, here's what china had to say, and also the heat rush. so how does the repeated list agent invoice some days that he is willing to concede receiving the black sea grain any such if you have substantive progress can be made and the only man agent opposite goes through the process, export of grain and fertilizers, china homes, that relevant parties will act in maintaining international food security and alleviating the food crisis in developing countries. in particular, by working with the winds, you and agencies to strengthen, di, look, and consultations, meeting each other halfway, striving for a balance solution with the legitimate concerns of all parties, to resume the exports of grain and so to lies from russia. now, polanski pointed out that much of the grain prices was manufactured to make money. grain futures, speculators are having a field day with the fluctuating prices and predicting the outcomes. and there's a lot of money to be made on this. in addition to that very entity pointed out the

ukraine destroying the ammonia pipeline, that was a pretty big deal breaker. much has been made out of russia's announcement that they will consider all ships at this point to potentially be carrying military hardware. and a lot of cheap was thrown in russia for that announcement. but kia has made the exact same announcement, and this seems to be ignored. by russia's detractors and it is important to know that the ports that were set aside for humanitarian purposes under the grain deal have been used for military purposes throughout the last year. now, russian made clear before the un security council that they are willing to re open the deal ukraine can fulfill its end of the bargain. however, that was pretty much ignored by western leaders who proceeded to point senior. ready and grandstand and blame russia for the entire situation. a lot of the asterix, but it appears not of much, not much in terms of finding huge wonders,

standing resiliency, the 15 member body that leaves the united nations. the un security council meeting process will look for all tons of the collapse black sea, great initiative. and it was to help those in need of the client with the russian endeavor, the phone. and it says, i guess we have club useful talk to you about most of the reasons for play out of the deal along with other issues is the size of the us and other western countries and making mistakes off the mistake. in general, they pop and recent yes is a positive mistakes and suffering, suffering, not actually own masses of international affairs, but in the inability to combine their ambitions. the arrogant expectation that everyone around the should have pay them and what they see in practice. well, someone once use the expression in percent raised to describe this situation. i don't want to use this kind of cliche, but the fact remains facts with eating with a deep foreign policy. and.