i left this, i've said this to me as well. they're saying now that like wait a minute, i'm paying what $8.00 for a carton of eggs. and the bind administration has continued to send billions of dollars to another country. so i think more people are starting to make that connection. i think that's the difference when you compare it to iraq. you know, it's interesting what you just said about left. i don't even know what the hell is the less than what the hell is the right anymore, because it seems like they've just somehow merged and found this place in the middle. in fact, you could make the argument that if the democratic party represents the left, which it certainly represents a lot more than the republican party represents the left that it's the left today in america that is promoting and supporting these raise the expensive endless wars. like what we're now seeing, developing a new credit. well, i wanna, i wanna clear something here because a lot of people say that the democratic party is left, the democratic party is not left, or those are liberals. they still lead center,

right? so i just want to make the distinction there, left, this are people who consider themselves to be progressive. people who are left of the democratic party, people like myself, we're the ones. yeah. now listen, i, i get that as a way to a hold on i, i get that and god love you for saying that. and i think you're making an important point that there's a true distinction between, you know, the institutional formalized that the establishment, which is maybe the best word democratic party and left us. but my point is, you certainly couldn't say republicans are left to scan. you know, you to not. yeah. so if you have to go down to specter between who's closer to the left democrats are closer to the left. so i agree with what you say by the way, that they're not necessarily representing a left point of view, which i think is what you're saying, right? are right. i mean, they're calling for censorship now, like this is ridiculous. you have people who are politicians, who i thought were suppose to be progressive,

like amc calling for censorship. calling for the silence of voices that she disagrees with their people who tend to criticize her. this is a problem. any time that you have, people like marjorie taylor green is calling for anti censorship and just calling to stops in, in the money to ukraine. that's supposed to be the perspective that comes from the left. yes, i think it happens when we come back. i want to ask you a little bit about the, the specific things that uh, that tucker has said and done in recent weeks prior to his, uh, being well, he supposedly resigned. but as we all know, he was fired. he was let go and that's the truth. of it you stay right there sabrina, i look forward to talking to you on the other side of the break. by the way, i should tell you, i have a pod cast where i as a journalist as a latino and as an entrepreneur or tell my story and share it with you. i also talk about what we learned about the stories that we talked about on the show. it's

called rick sanchez podcast. i invite you to check it out when we come back more on the firing of tucker cross and then what uh, what really meets stay with the a, a a, the the, the,

[000:00:00;00] the hungry is being a member of the european union, the nato, since 1999 during the 1st post, so good wave of nato's this would expansion number the status because of this, the me log a sense is dylan. i felt that i see like that uh by the quench its a. this is so me, i mean it of so we get back. i saw that but i did do my extra voice. i'm pretty sure the name. yeah. so much, not well beach, but i see, but i see us layouts by choice, some of which he strongly in the early ninety's hungry was

a country with the west view of russia to day star co disagreements left over from the soviet union. the why do you, what did you some of mine yours? i'm going to build on what i see if you follow up, you must somebody in the compare the police report more than otherwise, but i sees great and i did as a, it's a political though as much what the features a x of today because there's a lot of us have censorship on many topics in schools that start to just the migration topic. to my impression it went on with the climate change call me back. it's fine to understand them a call. you see it's, i mean, there was no, there was no way of debate. it was, i don't know. but, as of now it's about russia and it's about, yes, we have to fight russia and pressure has to be taken off the map.

the say, welcome back. i'm rick sanchez. you know, there's something else that's been happening of late regarding what we know in the firing of talk across and remember question was, fox is most, when you know, in most highly rated most to blue breaking host, for example, we have the compunction, if not the temerity the question, our country's foreign policy, something these days seems for been in american establishment media outlets. it is perhaps for that very reason that fox is getting a lot of heat now for firing crossing i went back once again talking to uh, sabrina sal body. she coast savvy sides, that's her podcast, and it's a darn good one. and she has a very unique way of looking at the, the politics of our time,

which obviously today is very much in and mixed with the news. and the editorial decisions of our time non bigger, more recently than what happened to tucker carlson where he was just off a sudden told one morning hey, don't come to work, you're fired. it was a complete shock to him. he was totally surprised. i know tucker, as you know, tuckers had me on a show many times and he and i have talked a lot over the years, i would consider him most a friend because you know, in this business, i don't know how close you have you. we are having those, but he did, he did get by, you're in this have dominion lawsuit and he did something which was quite interesting. he was actually uh heard, or i guess written on tags where he said about donald trump. i hate him. i hate him passionately. and ask for the argument that donald trump had lost the election. he called me, you said it was essentially a joke. and that, uh, you know,

he was embarrassed having to put that story on the air because he didn't think there was an a trip to it yet. he was going on the air and that saying those things essentially promoting donald trump and promoting the, the story about the election being a fraudulent. so that didn't cut to his credibility. did it not, as i would say. so i think a big part of the problem is, you know, in network network news, you have to do what the producers want you to do, or you lose your seat and they'll replace you with someone else, you know, but i couldn't imagine going on air almost every other night promoting a donald trump promoting something like that i really despise. uh so i would say that a tucker was a good actor in, in reference to that. but i think that this is something what, what does that say? but what does that say? what, what does that say? and you know, okay, tucker was doing that because for some reason he figured the read calculation was not to go on the or, and criticized drop. so he defended trump on the air, though privately he would tell his friends donald trump city,

and on the air he defended the election square foot whole. but privately he said, this is bullcrap and he did that. do you think they all do? that is, i wouldn't, i wouldn't be surprised. i really wouldn't. i wouldn't be surprised if there's commentators a cnn or a mist mbc that are not too keen on joe biden, but they have to read the script that they're given. they have to come on there and do their job. that's the thing is like they are trying to sell an image. they're trying to sell a certain types of politics. they're trying to support the state department on narrative, and that really is their job. i just wish more americans realized that. do you think uh, here's where the rubber meets the road. it's not so much what the, the editorial lists or the bosses cnn are on a 70 c or fox or anywhere. what they say right. is that your executive producer,

it's the people who are sit on board rooms, who want to make sure that the entity stays whole. so why would i do a story on, for example, the fact that politicians have to take bribes legal bribes so that they can have campaign funds so that they can then run for office when those campaign funds are then fed into cnn, and fox and tv to do commercials. so if i was to go on there and tell the truth, which is almost every politician in the united states is taking a legal bride. and politicians are being paid off every day by giant corporations. right. but because that money goes back to cnn and back to fox and back them as nbc in the form of advertising, they're not going to talk about it. and they're not them and criticize it. that's just one example that besides other businesses determining the editorial slab of the news. and unfortunately,

this is how it works. and that's why people have to look at who owns these companies, where the shareholders that are invested in these networks. you really have to trace it back and see if you look at a company like black rock or via gartner states state street. yeah. they're shareholders in the media space. and this is really important for people to understand. so the people that you see on the screen, they are merely just a pop it like they don't really have get the opportunity to say their real opinion . you know, this is why they were so critical against someone like bernie sanders because the bring him on the network and to hear him say, the billionaires are the problem. well, that doesn't sit well with the people who are on the board of the network. you know, so of course they're going to some your, someone like him. you know, it's interesting in the case of tucker, once again, he really played it. he played both sides against the middle because he knew foxes audience is very old and white and male. right? so the great for ponder and of foxes audience probably between 80 and 90 percent

are white. a man's, um certainly white. uh and the males pretty high as well. right. so he knew that he had to play a certain argument for them. and that's why tucker, when it came to the traditional arguments from the right, which i'm sorry, tends to be a little on the anti immigrant side. pardon me, i'm an immigrant, but you're not gonna hear fox news advocating for the rights of latinos in the united states. or african americans for that matter, not a friendly pace, better find the place for that audience. tucker knew how to continue that rhetoric so to speak. but he gave a more. he didn't just and there he didn't just do you know what a riley and how did he do, which is just play down the middle to the republican talking points. he stayed on some republicans having boards, but then took them out of the conduct reports like you said, with the situation in the ukraine which, which was

a tomato strategy. i've never seen anybody else do that on any network, which is i'll give you some of what i think you want, right? i'll give you your, your, your, your, uh, your dessert for lack of a better word or description. but you know what, here's your spinach and you're going to learn this. and by doing that he actually was leading the conservative cause toward trying to straighten out our foreign policy greeting debacle. that it is no or. yeah, i would say so i think, you know, he's trying to show again he was trying to give them what they want, but at the same time kind of slowly walk them to where they should be headed. and i think that's not easy to do. i don't think a lot of commentators do that. they usually tend to be one sided, one way or the other, but i said this when when tucker was, was fired. i said tucker, crossing can start a youtube channel tomorrow and probably already have a 1000000 subscribers. a lot of people like to listen to them and not just conservative their democrats. they used to watch like talk across and show. so i

think people have to understand whatever he was doing. it was engaging in a way that people wanted to turn in and watch him. do you think? what do you think killed the? i mean, 1st of all, we should know. he doesn't need to do anything because he's a swanson air and that means he is, you know, rich beyond anyone's wildest imaginations. and if he didn't want to work another day in his life, he didn't have to. however, i do believe like most of us, but he has an ego that needs to be fulfilled and he wants to be famous and he wants to be on the tv. and he will be well, according to the law mosque, he's supposed to do a show on twitter. yeah, so this should be interesting. i'm not sure how that will work out, but i think people will tune into twitter to see like tucker, because a lot of people like him is going to be different. i think this is a whole shift in the platform. apparently they're gonna allow people to subscribe to the show as well. so we'll see what happens and maybe more people may go that way. 100000000 people,

a 100000000 people watched tuckers blurb on twitter announcing that he was going to be creating a show on that. the format 100000000. think about that. do, do, do you know, tuckers, everybody gets excited about ratings, but cable news readings are actually pretty small. tucker, on a good day, had 3000000 people watching. and in terms of the demo, or what we call the $25.00 to $54.00 audience, which is the audience that matters. this audience was relatively tiny compared to the population of the united states, maybe 500000, not a good day, maybe, maybe 6, maybe 4. who knows? i mean, that's basically what the numbers were in a country of 350000000 people. it's not a huge, not now a 100000000. that's a big not. what does that say? yeah, more people have gone away from cable to be honest with you like the

a lot of people i know don't have cable subscription, haven't had one in years. their streaming services, so more people have like, especially my generation netflix, hulu. uh, but everybody, uh, for the most part, my generation is on twitter. so twitter, again, like the social media sites. youtube is another one that a lot of people are more willing to watch than cable. so i think again, i think the days of just like cable news, either they're going to have to do something drastically different to engage a new audience, particularly your younger audience. or they're just going to fade away. sabrina, somebody. my, uh, my thanks to you. the host of the savvy sab, you can catch her podcast on the revolutionary blackout network and, and she's out there. and we thank her for us taking some time to, to have those lively conversation with us today about the tucker carlson firing or lack of a better term or maybe using the most correct term. thanks again. sabrina. thank

you. hey, before we go, i want to remind you of our mission here. it's simple really. i want the silo the world. we've got stuff living in these little boxes truths. don't live in boxes everywhere. how much sanchez? and i'll be looking for you again, right here for help to provide a direct impact the the the watching wires and why in this country. what if i give borrowed money in the store in this they should have been a shorter one dinner, but i'm not going to stay less so kind scale. you know, when i am at your desktop session,

i am no. let's just shawn your, just in, when you bought a new born you sit on the, with the, the, the, the, by the early 1950. can you became one of the centers of resistance to colonialism. east africa. the british invaders infringed on the most basic rights of the local population. great britain pursued the policy of squeezing out the local population from their indigenous lands. the best airable areas were given to white farmers, dooming canyon stepfather, d, and hunger. this caused a sharp protest of the peasants and led to the emerging of the mile mile movement,

which started the fight against the invaders. the rebels felt themselves canyon land and freedom army. the spiritual leader of the movement would be anti colonial, active as jo, mo, kenyatta to freedom fighters used guerrilla tactics and attacked the individual units of the british troops. the latter responded with massive air rays and artillery effects. when suppressing the uprise of london relied on maximum cruelty over $50000.00 canyons were killed. about 300000 people were thrown into prisons and concentration camps, where tortures in no way inferior in girl z to the nazis was widely per access to the veracity of the colonialist only led the temporary success. in 1963, the british empire had to recognize the independence of gain. yeah. however, the colonial regime left behind a trail of blood and wounds that canyon nation has not recovered from on sale. now

the, the breaking news on the all t international at the school people the dead, the scolding booth, a gushes from a bust pipe. at the most go shopping center. a russian bull correspondent is killed by ukrainian across the bones with most skilled saying that t as on the west and on supplies best full responsibility for the attack. also this out white income come through to get around. 44 percent tend to various to they need to come to the states. the west launches on said rush, have a quick thing. the black sea deal with those on the big healthy you when. but at least 3 percent of the grain on the agreement reached off worker despite the initial plan. having

a found different goals signed on the streets of iran as people protest against swedish officials for again, authorizing a pro ron boning event the it's 8 pm. hey, in the russian capital, and this is on the international with the very latest world news update. it's good to happy with us that would begin with tragic news here in most go where for people that being confronted on schools in just is a college with a pipe burst at the seasons shopping center south west of the city of correspondent don't know. coral springs as mo, from the scene, as forwarding to emergency services, specifically the firefighters. the situation is now under control after a hot water pipe burst into a small scale mall, which you can see behind me. sending fox theme throughout the building. according to moscow is may or 4 people were killed and there, this is also being investigated. has

a case of criminal negligence. now that's according to russia's investigative committee. now media reports have also been saying that dozens of people have been injured around 10 of them have been hospitalized and emergency services have been working on the scene here for a long time. now there wasn't evacuation going on for some time, and we were even able to speak with a couple of people who were evacuated from the building. let's take a listen. movies really confused. it seems to be, i saw people looking alarmed on the 3rd floor where i work. i saw people looking down towards the escalators, we saw a steam rising and so smell of hot water. i went down to the 1st floor. all the water was on the 1st floor, then i went upstairs and we stood for 15 to 20 minutes and there was no announcement. no one said anything. people went to the shops and only after 15 to 20 minutes, the guard told us that it was time to go out, close everything and leave quickly. i was very worried and didn't understand why we weren't being evacuated earlier when the burst had just taken place. media reports

were saying that around 20 people were trapped inside the building, mostly on the 3rd floor and in the food court area. but we recently attended a press conference held by the emergency services. they said that the evacuation has been completed and nobody's left inside the building. and right now, the authorities are working inside to get to the bottom of what caused this pipe burst to the front line and brushes. is that for those your region now? where a will corresponding role still live is around the off has been killed by you crazy and shutting the door so that several of his colleagues wounded. moscow has blamed th of august west and sponsors for the atrocity. everything points to the fact that the attack on the journalist group was not a coincidence. the correspondence collected materials for a report on the shelling of the sap rosure regions settlements by key for she militants with cluster munitions which are banned in many countries of the world. those that are supplied to keep by the united states,

washington along with london in paris, which supply does the landscape regime with long range missiles, only verbally express concerned about the safety of journalists. but in fact, they are sponsors of terrorists. those guilty of the brutal massacre of a russian journalist will in every police suffer the punishment they deserve. the entire measure of responsibility will be shared by those who supply their keep proteges with cluster munitions. around midday, on such a group of just came under attack from ukrainian on forties. now we understand that they were traveling in a call and as i for roseville region, where they had been investigating the ukrainian use of costing me emissions because these controversial weapons are being supplied by the united states. now, the russian defense ministry has confirmed that those 2 and this came on to find themselves from the very cluster munitions that they were investigated to know a number of doing this, helping wounded,

they were rushed to hospital and very sadly, as we heard, well, just love a jewel of a real no boss, me will correspondence was killed in the attack on the number of others that have been wounded to varying degrees on the head of his upper rose. your region has pay tribute to the wall correspondence. this young talented guy spoke the truth from the very 1st day. he covered real life and this brushy region was on the front line more than once present the new men and military men and did not stand the side of civilians needed help to day he died at the hands of king of nazis. i express my deepest condolences to his family and friends. cool. so this whole place thought decision by the united states to supply the home traversal foster munitions on the closer scrooge. they would of course, it is not the 1st time that you cried. new forces have attacked john this uh, we heard a most recently the assassination attempt to the parts to, to the head of our team all got

a to so many. yeah. and that was on covered by the russian intelligence services. last year, recalls, perhaps most notoriously duke and i was killed in a call bomb explosion in moscow. now geneva convention protexture and the so to attack them is i will climb butts. uh, many of these many sought to attack. so like this and the killing a wounding and targeting of june. and this has a paused without remark without comment from many of the weld press freedom organizations, which is perhaps on surprising considering the largest of those of january funded by the us state department. us side on the national endowment for democracy. of course. well king, it was, or is it dangerous occupation? but many of those are being targeted outside of the was own and that helped by the marriage, bullets website, which is essentially a kill it. so you create new toners, what is hosted in langley, virginia,

which is the home of the a c i. but once again, we can see that the training and forces are simply ignoring international law as they continue to act with impunity. journalist on political analyst, jonesboro. these things, washington supports any ukrainian actions against civilians in washington, dc, and the nato allies just made very clear. i mean, they are fully supportive of kids. yes, i said we're going to an island. we're going to wipe out and kill and destroy the entire russian population. of done boss and crimea saying they overly mr. plans for genocide and they know the usa and they all have no says we will support you in that genocide. so unfortunately, you don't have to say that the death of the journalist will not make any difference . i will not impact west audiences at all. it will not impact western policy makers at all because they are firm, new and supportive of the policy of genocide. all of the rest of the population of,

of done boss and crime unit, which is what must formulate people. and this is going to be, this could be g unless, unless russia stops nato, unless it stops new, don't keep. this would be the worst genocide since the 2nd world war only a small amount of the grain exported from ukraine on to the black sea initiative ever reached the country's most in need of the claim. mozambique made it the un security council. the same argument. moscow has repeatedly made in the past, according to you in that, around the faith, 3 plus sense of export and the brakes. the deal. this is going to to low income countries. why our income come through to get around 45 percent, and there is to be need income states, the un security council can beans and many countries spoke prior to russia speaking a lot of the allegations were level,

and as we're reaching towards the end of the meeting after a number of security council members of spoken, we heard deputy and passengers, dimitri pully, and ski. then go ahead and deadlock, many of the fingers that were pointed at rush, i meant the allegations that were made here, some of what he said. we might, that was supposed to be, we listened carefully to your statements and were again struck by the degree of cynicism of the western members of the security council. i have a question for you. what did you actually expect from the very 1st days we drew everyone's attention to the fact that the initiative ceases to correspond to the originally stage goals? however, no steps have been taken to correct this trend. when we agree to the deal and heard calls to join forces for global security, we expected an end to discrimination on the part of western states which imposed the unprecedented sanctions against us. actually trying to organize a blockade against our industries. the grain deal was important,

not in our interest, but in the interest of the countries of the world that are most in need. now, throughout the meeting, the allegation was repeated that blame was solely on the shoulders of russia for the great brain deals failure. now, when the russian deputy ambassadors spoke, he pointed out the rush, it was willing to restore the deal. if you grand with a hold of the end of the bargain in the brush, i had extended the deal many times now. it was important to note that shyness spoke up and showed the not the whole world seems to by end of this logic and that they do indeed understand like other forces around the world understand that is green deal is a 2 way a street rather than a one way street, here's what china had to say, and also the heat rush so has repeatedly stated in recent days that he is willing to concede receiving the black sea grain any such if you have substantive progress can be made and the only men agent opposite goes to ross's export of grain and