experts have confirmed that this is true, they say inverters, transformers and all other equipment installed on this solar farm of open supplied by your bomb based companies. they didn't get to potential is there in our country . we should not say that there are sanctions, so we cannot do anything because they don't allow us to access a certain component. the solar plan is a small example that shows that if we want to achieve something, we can easily indigenous the samples and produce local versions that are more efficient than their for and peers. all of the components on the boards, the parts themselves, coding and programming are old, domestic and have been produced by number of knowledge based around in companies with western firms apps and from a raw's clean energy sector. local producers are increasingly partnering with major tech companies from it was closed, sound lies to boast. the capacity of the countries renewable energy level confirmed behind this project is now planning to be able to more sooner plants in the province of some not inviting russian companies to take part in the projects.

initially, the kid is actually a sanctions, the target, both iran and russia and the potentials existing in both countries can significantly help the decides to cope right into the renewable energy sector. i believe the level of engagement between the knowledge based companies of the 2 countries has so far not been up to the marketing to size can utilize the technologies of one another, $500.00 for now the total production of renewables. and it wrong stands that slightly over 1000 megawatt hours, that's less than one percent of the countries total electricity output. most of the electricity generated anyone comes from thermo power plants, which mostly want on natural gas. now the launch of this sooner form comes in line with efforts being rate, whether you want in governments to increase the share of clean energy use 210000 megawatt hours by 2025, 5000 megawatts of which were supplied by solar power. the use of the only off to dumb high and over to israel. now where 3 people have been injured

after a car rammed into a crowd of protesters that has people across the country vents or anger over the is really connect sets approval of a controversial judicial reform. a warning you might find the following images distressing. the footage of a car ploughing through protesters blocking a highway is circulating on social media, is really police have reportedly detained a 20 year old driver. the driver's motive is unclear. the intel of these protests turn violence and police use the times to subdue crowds, mounted police were also deployed at least 19 people have been arrested across the country. protest and tel aviv attracted large crowds of people who were seen

blocking roads lighting fires, and using fireworks. police use force to disperse the gathering, firing water cannons into the crowd. the government could face strikes, legal action and discontent for military reserve is and what's been described as israel's biggest domestic crisis. in decades, the israel's prime minister has defended the reform claiming the country supreme court will remain independent. hi, only told him i would do the necessary democratic move, which aims to restore the balance between the branches of government as it was for 50 years. we're past the correction to the reasonableness bill so that the

collective government can carry out policy based on the boat of the majority of people in the country. even disagreement with this matter change does not justify the disruption of causing suffering to millions of citizens who cannot get to work or to hospitals or to the airport. to get more on this was cross live now to center rockman pen knesset and really design as party member who supported the reform bill . a welcome sir. now you promoted this reform and one of the people who did, which is the source of much condemnation and protests. why did you support it? myself? i don't fear 1st. i don't think that this reform is the source of the coming be kind of mentation and, and food. i think uh, 1st this reform and introduce a checks and balances to the own chest and on balance is demetrius. it's not that disrupting checks and balances of democracy. i think the most a,

most of the approach and most of the people that are connected to this protest protesting the existence existence of because they do not protest this action or that action this legislation to the passage station leaders on the powder state. hopefully these government is the legitimate they do not accept the outcome of the election. investments is something that the democratic country can accept. well, i'm not know. then we also know that there are some indians, really army protesting against the reforms. is the coalition concerned that there may be security threats to the country because of this situation? and i think that the, i think that the security of the state of israel, i realize that the majority, vast majority of the people were serving and on the army and the reserve forces. i think that talking about i'm not going to the army or not joining the reserve

forces. this is at this talk is read on security of the state of israel, but i don't, i don't think it poses no security threat. i think this is the most of the letters and the motor is the department of the protest were sending around whenever the numbers were checked, it was discovered that it's mostly a p orest of many, many people who sign those petitions and they will not carmen will not fly, and then you know, for something like that or, or nothing active for and more than becky. and it's, it's a response. it's a hurting the image of the state of israel is hurting the security of the state of israel, just talking about it. but i don't think it poses a real threat, is the security of the state of the most. i'm an israel are also saying that the law was passed, a favor prime minister netanyahu because of the corruption accusations against him

. what do you say to that, and who do you think the law favors a good thing? the law has nothing to do the locations against prime minister, nothing. you know, it deals with issues or democracy and deal with issues when the minister is trying to x to make a policy decision based on his own better just move. and the court just makes it susan instead of him again, it does not exist in any other country in the world that i know that the court can just decide on the, on the, on the pointers, based on its own agenda against the better judgement of the elected officials and the self appointed course in israel, and create a self appointed and a high ranking officials list basically are appointed to by the court instead of by the elected officials or by the public and major decision. if we want to find

a b s t 0, so we cannot do it because the courts and forces views on the system is real. many, many examples. the situation when the court fears and government action based on the politics of the part of the judges instead of based on law or any other and legal rule. and that's my little credit because that's against the racial forms that need to be changed. but the new issue within israel was taken out of proportion by a position that decided these government, these legitimate and the fighting to take down the government not to try to protest this legit page. central rosman member of the religious scientist party. thank you very much. thank you. thank you us. and that's a rep for now for the latest breaking news, head over to r t dot com and be sure to follow us on odyssey rumble and gab from our content.

thanks for watching. we'll see you back at the top of the hour, the the, [000:00:00;00] the, the welcome to was a part worst coolers have low pointed out that having the united states as a security backer house to create a hold of moral hazard for its allies. cool. open become jo,

politically inflated and more resistant to compromises piece proposal. but when it comes to the war in the ukraine, is washington even interested in peace? well, to discuss that, i'm now joined by david pine, a former us army combust arms officer and military affairs commentator. supine is great to talk to thank you very much for your time. thank you so much revenue in your show. now i know that in addition to your military career and the analysis, you are also an avid historian and you read a lot of history books on that passion of yours began at the tender age of 11. if i'm not mistaken. and the conclusion that you derive from all of that is that the most worth of the united states has bought or has supported, made it less secure. do you think the war in ukraine is going to be the exception? no, no, not at all. in fact, it may be one of the greatest examples of making us less secure. i mean,

us national security interest, obviously, 1st and foremost is to preserve the great power peace with russia and china. and the way to do that force is uh through uh, pursuing uh diplomatic because she had a compromise agreements much as much as rushes proposed am i, i might know um and, and not to pursue uh you know, these uh escal ever escalating proxy words such as uh, the bite of history shes privily pursuing against russia and ukraine. national security interest, just like here they are in the eyes of the beholders. and i've heard many, a russian uh list suggests that for the americans, the, when your brain is a very sweet deal, you mentioned the proxy war. and it's actually a fairly well developed military doctrine that sees a war on the foreign land as a, as an acceptable. and in fact, uh, you know, genius, a change or a genius alternative for the kinetic,

for the actual kinetic conflicts in which the united states would have to lose money and soldiers. so why would they even abandon this? we deal when they can counter the nuclear adversary. through funding war in ukraine, i'm also sending a powerful my message to another adversary. i'm talking about china here to well, i think there's a lot of the 1st thing down on sides or, or, i guess not, not so much i proceeded, but a little mention downsized. us the involvement of warranty trade. and one of the biggest ones, of course, is the unilateral disarmament conditional assortment of us military us military has been studying vast amounts of high tech weapon systems. precision guided munitions in both rocket launch systems to ukraine. and these are weapons that we would need in order to fight. and i mean, to find a fight, a war, we think a great power such as china, for example, a little low when such a war. so,

but more importantly, i think the greatest threat that the us involvement is, is accomplishing is that it's increasing the chances of a cyber e a b, or nuclear exchange with the russian federation. and that's, that's where we don't want to fight because it's a war that could result in mass of destruction on both sides. now, this is actually a very interesting observation of yours, that the united states itself is left without a modern weaponry. and maybe that's due to the call kit calculation, that it would not have to face the battle with either russia in china. and in fact, i have heard the number of russian, the very respect that the russian military analyst, such as the one of the reasons why the united states allows itself to behave in such a way. uh, in relation to both of these countries is the loss of fear and the loss of this basic life assuring uh, feeling on this planet. because if you're, if you're actually allows us to, you know,

see the danger and try to prevent it. do you see any truth to that that the united states has become fearless? yes, absolutely. and that's one of the main problems i think with us for a policy and national security policy is that we no longer have the fear of if you the war to a large extent. i mean, the, as i were left or what the previously as i were left here and here in america has now become the problem or left over like warning potential nucular war, world war with the russian federation. and it is, you know, things that kind of change psyched and service such as myself or not, i would say. and so i work, but we are very adverse to uh, uh, these massive risks such as we're undertaking with uh, you know, potential world war with russia completely unnecessary. and there is no us strategic national security interest and you created all, i would say there was no interest us interested in ukraine. whereas it's

a very vital interest for the russian federation that ukraine be restored to a neutral buffer state. uh, separated it from uh, from nato countries. now, you mentioned that you describe yourself as a, as a conservative. and i wonder if there has indeed been a change of paradigm in the american strategic and security. thinking from seeing a war as a sort of a means of geo politics. the continuation of vegetables is by other means. but something that you do at the last resort to we're seeing more as simply a way of doing business in this day and age. how's the war become more acceptable to them? merican security and military establishment? well, i think there's a huge disconnect to this next question. there's a huge disconnect between the american people and our leaders. so i mean we have someone like saturday or settlement minority leader, mitch mcconnell, who is in stated that the number one, the most important issue is the supporting you trained or general. i mean, that's a huge disconnect. no one,

no one america in america really feels that we are very few, a percentage wise. we have much more important concerns. domestic concerns, obviously the trust from china, which is the highlighted by the, the, the chinese air ship incursions, which we've recently shot down of. so a lot of rooms, the british, more important issues and then you create a new create as a country, as a country, half a world away from united states of where is it?