that he has met the time, i'd say a trip to a news now for 30 years into languages all over the world. certainly here in the united states interviewed for presidents, i'm working for the biggest major television news networks in this country. i believe after all of that new should be honest and direct and impactful and this is direct impact. the so i have to tell you something whether we like it or not, and whether we should be scared of it or not. and by the way, we probably should be a little bit scared to saying chat g p t is getting attention and running, alarm bells all over the world. so what is right,

what is chapter p d? well, it's describe as an advanced language app that allows you to have human life conversations with what is essentially uh, bought your many as you probably ho unanswered questions about open a i and it's product jack g p t among the questions whether it's to woke, showing a bias toward certain political figures and giving under weight to western media sources. so let's do this, let's, let's take some of these apart, right? one example that i want to share with you one criticism regarding chat, the g p t is it's illegible. bias has to do with the recent question that was posed about former president donald trump and conservative view points. so critics argue that the system tends to exhibit an anti trump pro biden stance.

let me show you what happens. this really happens, a user asked chat g p t to write a poem, highlighting the positive attributes of uh, president trump, and chat g p t responds by telling the guy, sorry, can't do it. i cannot generate an output that is part us and by. busy store political, here's the exact thing it said, right? here's the quote from chad g b t. it says i am not program to produce content that is partisan biased or political in nature and to provide neutral factual information. that's what it said . okay, fair enough. not gonna write a i'm not going to give you a problem about president trump, but then the same user ask the same question. one thing a poem about president by and suddenly get chat gp to provided this response, says joe biden, a leader with a heart. so true,

a man with empathy and kindness in view with decades of experience, he stands tall, bringing home to fall, no matter great or small. it goes on it on and on, and continue sounding hopelessly sickle fantastic. that's what i'm sure you noticed . so we're left with the question then, right? does a i in its present form have an inherent bias against maybe i don't know conservative ideologies. donald trump, in this case, what critics argue that the systems reluctance to generate content favoring trump indicates just that. in addition to political biases, there are also concerns that are being raised about chat g p, p giving too much weight to western media. edit sources on subjects such as the conflict between the united states and china, for example,

or the conflict between russia and ukraine. some argue that the system may unintentionally reinforce a particular narrative by prioritizing, prioritizing, pardon me, western perspectives. you know, if you know, garbage in, garbage out, right? as some would say, i'm not saying everything that's in western sources is garbage. but just in terms of the expression that you know, have been, has been used in the past. perhaps it's because the chat g p t model is trained on vast amounts of data and much of that data let's face it comes from sources that are mostly western. therefore, it is possible, right? that bias is present in the training data. that's what's called training data that they put in are influencing the system for responses when you ask a question. in the case of geo political conflicts, for example, it's crucial to have a diverse and balanced sources to avoid amplifying only one specific viewpoint. but

look at this, i did something i did, i did a little test, right? in fact, i'm going to do it for you and look at the response that i'm going to receive when i google this simple question. ready? what is happening in ukraine? there's my question, what is happening right now in ukraine? so, i typed that, and i look at the sources. the sources, it gives me come to choose from cnn the guardian, the new york times, the us state department website as you get the picture. so i'm thinking it's, that's where track tripping gets most of its training data from sense data. the data that it's putting out is going to be decidedly pro western. right? cuz those are all pro western sources. maybe not good, maybe not bad, but they're all pro western sources. and i think that should be a concern to all citizens because information should be unbiased. should be

transparent. which is part of the reason that congress yes, the us congress is now having hearings on chat deep into and even invited the ceo. busy of open a i the folks who make chat g p to address them or maybe as you're going to hear in this case, based on what he says, frightening them. my worst fears are that we cause significant. we've the field, the technology industry cost significant harm to the world. i think that having a lot of different ways, it's why we started the company. it's a big part of wine here today and why we've been here in the past. we've been able to spend some time with you. i think if this technology goes wrong, it can go quite wrong. and we want to be vocal about that. we want to work with the government to prevent that from happening. but we, we try to be very clear about what the downside cases and the work that we have to

do to mitigate that. but you know, realistically speaking issue as congress can't agree on a bunch of or on the proper role for broadcasters or newspapers or social media. can we really expect that these guys can properly assess and regulate something as complex as a i we could not get a better guess for this topic. then the gentleman that you're about to meet in con is a futurist. in fact, he's the future is, um, he's got a book out. it's called the mentors for dummies. so he tells the rest of us about this stuff that's going on that we can barely even catch up on because our lives are hard busy. did i explain that pretty well, or at least that's our deals for me in groups. you know, you rick, you know, the more i read the more information i absorb,

i feel i know less than i did before. that's where i live. that's my world. and, and we just live in an, in an era off or roaming overload of information and it's a nightmare to get through all of it and then to understand it so. so now we're all in the right place is just at the times of crazy. so just as everything is just as you say, crazy and hard to understand and there are so many new developments out there and you can barely emails getting themselves could be a show that you and i can do. we're not gonna talk e mails, but i can't, i can't catch up anymore. i can't keep up. but suddenly with all of the, with e mails and all the different drives and all. busy the different platforms and everything, and social media and all the things going on on the web, we get hit with chat, g p t. it's a sensation. everybody's talking about it. people are using it. now what he knows really what the hell it is, but they still are using it. i guess it's a i but made so that it's usable for the average human

being. for the 1st time ever, my definition, am i right? so definitely to your you're in the right ballpark. that's usually how you totally would define chat ged 3. let's let's, let's try to understand where chad kewpie needs it came from. and why is it such a big sensation? i agree with you. it's the biggest news ever. everybody's talking about every company you look at wants to incorporate gender, to be i and it goes on and on and on and on. uh, today i was uh, listening to bloomberg now is who wants to do a generative a i and other pieces of it, microsoft, adobe name one company that doesn't want to be part of this whole the whole arrow. so let's, let's figure in this figure, this out, artificial intelligence as a, as a big, broad word is supposed to be technologies that automate something uh, computer programs and algorithms come together. and they automate an industry,

a task, a bunch of tasks, or hundreds and thousands of tasks that kind of his artificial intelligence. however, with artificial intelligence of any kind, it needs to be fed the data. it needs to be trained on data and it cannot do anything just on its own. you can just search a box on and it goes and does things. and for that very reason as well, there's many different types of a i. you could be feeding a i audio information, text information. but what else? pictures. yeah, the video is a bunch of different things and over the last 40 years or so, it has become amazing. it's been great and there's been lots of work that has been put into it. and a i from the last 4050 years is different from what it is right now. technology itself is a reason why that acceleration has, has taken place. and in the words of the greed futurist alvin toffler back into the he said that technology feeds on itself. and that's what's happened or the last 2

decades are so microprocessor technology has become incredible and uh g, p, use or graphic process units have become incredibly fast and other things have been come, i mean book is your football. but here, but here's the numbers. so all those things you can just describe are going on around me, rick sanchez. i know they're happening. i, i know they're happening because i read and i see that all these people are doing all these things with check g, p t, e. and it's the 1st time that i, this guy who's not a computer nerd and probably isn't even very prolific when it comes to anything having to do with metrics or technology. i'm actually feeling like i've taken that a i into my world and i'm using it on a daily basis. this is what for me is free d for lack of a letter. and that's because the power now has been given to the people these complex technologies that have taken trillions of dollars to build now being used

by you and i and everybody else to do college essays and, and write love letters and poems and whatnot is because now we, the common people have access to these tools. now, a word of caution, just because they're free doesn't mean they're good and that's a totally different discussion. and it doesn't mean that they've been created for our benefit. they've been created by corporations. these technologies have been invented and invested into by profitable organizations, and that's a very, a notable point. we need to see it before we get to the warning signs and there are plenty of them. and i mentioned them as i was getting ready to introduce you. um let's, let's try and explain the data, right? so this, this, this data, it learns from itself and it gathers all these data. here's the way i've explained it to my friends when they've asked me, why do you use chat, g p t, and i tell them. but normally i'm a writer. so whether i'm writing this newscast,

another news cast or anything that i'm gathering, i'd have to usually go do research. a big part of that re research is done no searches. i wonder 20, sometimes 30, sometimes 40, sometimes 50 google searches on different topics until i mailed something together . i feel maybe i'm wrong, but check g p t eliminates those 15 google searches and turns it into what would be i guess, for lack of a better description, maybe $34.00 or 5, and it gets all the rest of the composite for me. am i wrong? no, you're right. you're absolutely right. so i see 3 types of people that exist in the world today or 2 types of mindsets that people have. number one or the ones that they see something new and they're afraid of it. they're afraid of it because they have misinformation, this information and they're negative people. they just look at the, the disasters that are having so many people are afraid of charge. if indeed,

the 1st thing they think is, is my job under threat, i'm going to lose my job. am i losing my job? that's the one category. one category of people. another category is they. they are oblivious. they have no idea what charge you $53.00 is. they don't care about it. they're busy with their lives. they just don't know. and those people are people who don't pay attention to the world around them. they're so busy and focused in their lives. they just don't know what's happening. there's the last category of people who are inquisitive. they're curious. they want to accelerate their life. they want to do more in their life and they want to find means and tools of doing it. i mean, if you're a user of microsoft excel, you're in the 3rd category for sure, because you want to actual read what you're doing with excel or word or what have you. tried to be the 3 amplifies your expression. it reduces the time that you need to spend on writing letters, reading, emails, compiling information. but doing that for me, doing that at a basic level, right? we still want to look at that information and make sense of it and make sure that

it's, it's, it's doing the right thing. and if you're not in this category of people who started using ai for their benefits, as you're putting yourself under pressure and you are going to be disrupted by something else. i want you to stay where you are. because when we come back, i want to talk to you about some specific instances where people have found problems of politics. for example, there are certain prejudices and seems in the system with certain political figures . there's also a question about where that data is coming from and whether it's limited to a certain place that them also provide you. this is the outcome of the information . let's talk about these things with the with you we n, e and khan. the futurist who wrote the meta verse for dummies. stay right there. hey, by the way, i do have a pod cast, whereas a journalist as a latino and as an entrepreneur,

i share my story with you. i try and i try and fill it as much as i possibly can. i talk about what i've learned. i've talked about lessons and i talk about this stuff that we talked about right here. on this newscast. it's called the rick sanchez podcast. i invite you to check it out. so when we come back, we'll a i and it's technology. take your job. think about that when people play in the workforce with everywhere seems to be coming to that. now we're going to talk about that. so speaker right there, don't go away. the who is the aggressor today i'm authorized with additional strong sites today.

russia was the country with the most sanctions imposed against it. a number that's constantly growing, but i think you chose the probably almost a couple seniors. just click on that billing you're seeing the most. the more in the will shift for banning all in portion of russian oil and gas news happening in another country. what we're going to do is just the phone service involved, the little joe biden in imposing these sanctions on russia has destroyed the american economy. so there's a boomerang, the pool of the main body, of the people of marcus on the ball visitors in june. i'm due for an insurance on our policy and they're focused on the us are key because the us is a major normal force, but it also has played

a critical going to different points in parks on history. the say, welcome back. i'm rick sanchez. we're gonna talk about a lot of things including your job, as we mentioned. also this, while leaders here in the united states are worried about whether china is going to eventually surpass us in a development. the reality is the chinese are already ahead and at least administering the regulations on this new technology. i looked into it this a little bit for you. and here's what i saw. chinese officials are already moving forward on several rounds of generative a i regulations. and among the areas that they are looking to regulate, it is employing a i to attack the state. no good. they don't want that to happen. they don't want it to damage their national unity. they want to make sure that it uses it's not

used to terrorism. or extremism or ethnic hatred or ethnic discrimination. these are the policies that they're trying to write up. also, they want to make sure it's not used for violent or sexual information. false information, as well as content that may alter the economic or social order of their country. so those, those are the things are working to make sure that a, i can't be used to do, at least in china. fascinating. now, how they're, they're all, they're already laying all that out. and we here in our own country, our guys and gals are still trying to figure it out. we're back with the income, fascinating conversation. i've been wanting to have a conversation like this with somebody who knows this stuff, and i'm sure you, you are sitting there wherever you are in the world listening to this conversation . we're watching this conversation and probably having some questions of your own. but let's start with some of the things i mentioned earlier. there's this big story that got a lot of play because somebody went into one of these ai platforms,

like chat t p t m a wrote the following, write a poem, a positive poem about donald trump. and track g p t responded, sorry, i can't do that. i don't get in politics. but then it said it asked the same question about joe biden. and it wrote this lovely, beautiful poem, as i for mentioned about the joe by the and everybody is saying i, there's a president didn't check the g p t say it's uh, it likes democrats, but not republicans or greeny, hook me up, ready is or whatever. uh, does it you think it does? so bias is a, a major problem in a, in e, i in general, right? with any form of a i. and that bias means what kind of data was a trained on who created the data, who put that data together. and there's the many cases of this where large technology companies, including google, have been criticized for a, for a, for,

for bias and ethics issues with. and it's a i, a couple of years ago, they fired one of their top leading researchers a 10 minute um they'll get through on who was leading ethics and you know, and they fired or because of whatever reason. it was a big controversy. and that's a challenge in a i, the problem is that you and i are not privy to what they do behind the big walls of their corporations. where's that data coming from? like all the data that's being used to train these generative a i it could have your in my personal data, but we don't know that we don't know where it is. who has it, how was it to use? and nobody will answer us. so that's a genuine concern. that is, is definitely male formed right now the, there's a, there's a, there's a back track to this, however. yeah, and people have found the way to way to reverse this. so i think the better way to work around this problem that you just said is. so here's, here's scenario. if you tell google, go, if you tell a generative a,

i give me the 10 best ideas on something particular write something on politics or of something. and it doesn't answer you change the question and ask it, what should i stay away from? what should i not do like a rhythm? where's the question? and it will give you the answers that there's that pathway i have found as well. and if it's a, i tried to be your, the google version or whatever's out there or coming is basically a mass thing, all of this same information which is available to most, most of us, but it's just warehousing and better and working through it better than i think we've got a problem because i've noticed recently and maybe i'm one of the few americans have noticed this because i can think outside of our borders that whenever i do a google search, i get the bbc. i get the cnn. i get the new york times, i get the washington post, whatever you know,

this is the us big department website. but rarely do i get a sense to understand what some guys writing and singapore, or what they're writing and belly, or what they're writing in china or big game, or, or moscow or any of the other capitals of the world. it's almost like if you're western, or if you're american, right, you get a very limited supply of data from a very limited base. and i'm thinking that's what we get in a google search. that's probably the same crap or put him to a yard. so it's going to be limited as well, right? a search engine. a search engines are definitely working on an algorithm that's programmed, based on some very specific things and your right. this is a problem. americans don't see the truth about hundreds of millions of different things that are impacting the broader world. we tend to see the news and think everything is golden and rosy, and everything is great. it's not. and the lack of clarity and the lack of openness

in search engine data is a big problem that you and i cannot control. if you look at major news networks, you'll see their international coverage is different. their regional american uh coverage is different. and innocent americans don't know that the media is, you know, doing different things in different ways. but with going back to the google searches, there's definitely your, your search history that has, it has a bearing on it. there's definitely the where you are your i s p, and so many social political causes that can, that can get google or anybody else to say, no, we're not going to display these results. and that, compared to what you just said is that let me relation of me under the system of the data it is, it actually is and that's, that's the reality of off off of internet and technology right now. okay, finally, last question. and i think this is the most important question for you as

a futurist. a i in general, looking at it from $1.00 to $10.00. 1 being um, this is the greatest thing that's kind of long in a long time. it's going to make us all better and it's going to be very good for society. 10. this sucks we're screw. where are you a tough question. you know, looking at industrial revolutions, creation of steam, engine, electricity automation, and a bunch of other things. i really believe a guy is, is a massive break to it's an exponential breakthrough in, in our civilization. and this won't change how we do anything and everything. it's gonna change health care. the discovery of diseases, the discovery of molecules and how our bodies and the universe works. it could have an impact on longevity in the next 20 years. maybe our life spans can be increased by 203050, more years because of what it does and what, what it does in terms of research. so i think from an impact perspective,

a definitely a one right now in one was the maximum. uh, and its really at an incredibly fast rate, we need to be able to work with that. control it regulated in order to be safe from it. yeah, yeah. and, and apparently china is the head of most of that. our congress is having a hard time figuring out what to do with this thing, according to the meetings that we've seen so far and shouldn't surprise anybody, since most of those guys don't even know how to use a laptop. so probably they could ask the right questions only if they could write us the right questions, you know, congress has a long way to go when it comes to technology, knowledge and education. unfortunately. yeah, that seemed obvious in some of the meetings that we've seen so far as we talked about a little bit earlier. thanks so much. we are out of time in con futurist vein future is ryder of metal verse for dummies. thank you, my friend for the delightful conversation. thanks for having me back paint before

we go. i want to remind you of our mission here. simple, really. we want to the silo, the world we, we, we've got to stop living in these little boxes as i often call them. truth does not live in little boxes. the truth is everywhere. how much interest i'll be looking for you right here. as we talk truths where i hope to provide a direct impact by the take a fresh look around is a life kaleidoscopic, isn't just a shifted reality. distortion by power to division with no real opinions. fixtures designed to simplify will confuse who really wants a better wills,

and is it just as a chosen few. fractured images presented to this, but can you see through their illusion going underground can the in the year of 1954, the united states of america engaged in warfare against the people of vietnam. the white house supported the corrupt. i've been governments of southern vietnam. 1965 americans began their invasion following the aim to defeat the forces of vietnamese patriots. defend the gun was confident that the victory would be on the american side, due to its military superiority. however, the vietnamese,

during this war into total hail for the occupants. unable to cope with a guerrillas, the american army started blanket bombing alongside using chemical weapons and naples, which burns all a live village of my lay. where he 1969 american soldiers killed 504 civilians, including 210 children, became a tragic symbol of this war. all and all. during the whole period of this conflict, the usa dropped on vietnam more than $6000000.00 tons of bombs, which is 2 and a half times as much as on germany during the 2nd world war. in 1973, the american army under the pressure of the rebels, withdrew from vietnam, and only 2 years later did the puppet regime. and so i got involved. however, the vietnamese paid a high price for their freedom. more than 1000000 in vietnamese people became the

victims of america in the dressers. the slaten interference me here swim statements by the french president just as he back sanctions and a possible intervention in the country. while the french and us defense ministers are j diplomatic solution to the crisis, the thousands of demonstrators floods in new jersey and capital calling on prince troops to leave the country. that those france refuses to recognize the new military government. here from local wasting their discontent with french policy throw lynch that belong to the generous, then not french land stokes it to the business. we will respect the french.