honest and direct impact so and this is direct impact the so i have to tell you something whether we like it or not. and whether we should be scared of it or not. and by the way, we probably should be a little bit scared to sam. track g, p d is getting attention and running, alarm bells all over the world. so what is right, what is chapter p p. well is describe as an advanced language app that allows you to have human wide conversations with what is essentially uh bought. there are many, as you probably ho unanswered questions about open a i and it's product chat, g p, d, among the questions, whether it's to woke, showing

a bias toward certain political figures and getting under weight to western media sources. so let's do this. let's take some of these apart, right? one example that i want to share with you one criticism regarding chat g p t is it's a legend. bias has to do with the recent question that was posed about former president donald trump and conservative view points. so critics argue that the system tends to exhibit an anti trump pro biden stance. let me show you what happened was really happen. a user asked chat g p t to write a poem, highlighting the positive attributes of uh, president, trump, and chat g p t responds by telling the guy, sorry, can't do it. i cannot generate an output that is partisan biased or political.

here's the exact thing. it said, right, here's the quote from chad g, b t. it says i am not program to produce content that is partisan biased or political in nature and to provide neutral factual information. that's what it said . okay, fair enough, not gonna write a i'm not going to give you a problem about president trump, but then the same user asked the same question. one thing a poem about president bud and suddenly get chat gp to provided this response, says joe biden, a leader with a heart. so true, a man with empathy and kindness in view with decades of experience, he stands tall, bringing home to fall, no matter great or small. it goes on it on and on, and continue sounding hopelessly sick, authentic. that's what i'm sure you noticed. so we're left with the question then,

right, does a i in its present form have an inherent bias against maybe i don't know conservative ideologies. donald trump, in this case, or critics argue that the systems reluctance to generate content favoring trump indicates just that. in addition to political biases, there are also concerns that are being raised about chat g p, p giving too much weight to western media and its sources on subjects such as the conflict between the united states and china, for example, or the conflict between russia and ukraine. some argue that the system may unintentionally reinforce a particular narrative by prioritizing, prioritizing, pardon me, western perspectives. you know, if you know, garbage in, garbage out, right? as some would say, i'm not saying everything that's in western sources is garbage. but just in terms of the expression that you know have been, has been used in the past, perhaps,

is because the chat gaping team model is trained on vast amounts of data. and much of that data let's face it comes from sources that are mostly western. therefore, it is possible, right, that bias is present in the training data. that's what's called training data that they put in are influencing the system for responses. when you ask a question. in the case of geo political conflicts, for example, it's crucial to have a diverse and balanced sources to avoid amplifying only one specific new point. but look at this, i did something i did, i did a little test, right? in fact, i'm going to do it for you and look at the response that i'm going to receive when i google this simple question. ready? what is happening in ukraine? there's my question. what is happening right now in ukraine? so i typed that and i look at the sources. the source is,

it gives me come to choose from cnn the guardian, the new york times, the us state department website as you get the picture. so i'm thinking it's, that's where track chipping thing gets most of its training data from the data. the data that it's putting out is going to be decidedly pro western. right? cuz those are all pro western sources. maybe not good, maybe not bad, but they're all pro western sources. and i think that should be a concern to all citizens because information should be unbiased. should be transparent. which is part of the reason that congress, yes, the us congress is now having hearings on chat deep into an even invited the ceo of open a i the folks who make chat g p to address them. or maybe as you're going to hear in this case, based on what he says, frightening them,

my worst fears are that we cause significant. we've the field, the technology industry cost significant harm to the world. i think that crap and a lot of different ways. it's why we started the company. it's a big part of wine here today and why we've been here in the past. we've been able to spend some time with you. i think if this technology goes wrong, it can go quite wrong. and we want to be vocal about that we want to work with the government to prevent that from happening. but we, we try to be very clear about what the downside cases and the work that we have to do to mitigate that. but you know, realistically speaking issue as congress can't agree on a bunch of or on the proper role for broadcasters or newspapers or social media. can we really expect that these guys can properly assess and regulate something as complex as

a i we could not get a better guess for this topic. then the gentleman that you're about to meet in con is a futurist. in fact, he's the future is. so he's got a book out, it's called the members for dummy. so he tells the rest of us about this stuff that's going on that we can barely even catch up on because our lives are hard, busy. did i explain that pretty well, or at least that's our deals for me in groups. you know, you rick, you know, the more i read the more information i absorb, i feel i know less than i did before. that's where i live. that's my world. and, and we just live in an, in an area off or roaming overload of information. and it's a nightmare to get through all of it and then to understand it so. so now we're all in the right place is just at the times of crazy. so just as everything is just as you said, crazy and hard to understand and there are so many new developments out there and

you can barely emails getting themselves could be a show that you and i can do. we're not going to talk e mails, but i can't, i can't catch up anymore. i can't keep bucks. but suddenly, with all of the, with the e mails and all the different drives and all. busy the different platforms and everything, and social media and all the things going on on the web, we get hit with chat, g p, t. it's a sensation. everybody's talking about it. people are using it. nobody knows really what the hell it is, but they still are using it. i guess it's a i but made so that it's usable for the average human being. for the 1st time ever, my definition, am i right. so definitely be your, you're in the right ballpark. that's usually how you totally would define a chat, ged 3. let let's. let's try to understand where chad to be need to came from. and why is it such a big sensation and i agree with you. it's the biggest news ever. everybody's

talking about it. every company you look at wants to incorporate gender, to be i and it goes on and on and on and on. uh today i was uh, listening to bloomberg now who wants to do a generative a i and other pieces of it. microsoft, adobe name one company that doesn't want to be part of this whole, the whole arrow. so let's, let's figure in this figure, this out, artificial intelligence as a, as a big, broad word is supposed to be technologies that automate something. uh, computer programs and algorithms come together and they automate an industry, a task, a bunch of tasks, or hundreds and thousands of task. that kind of is artificial intelligence. however, with artificial intelligence of any kind, it needs to be fed the data. it needs to be trained on data and it cannot do anything just on its own. you can just search a box on and it goes and does things. and for that very reason as well, there's many different types of a i. you could be feeding a i audio information,

text information. but what else? pictures. yeah, the video is a bunch of different things. and over the last 40 years or so, a i has become amazing. it's been great and there's been lots of work that has been put into it. and a i from the last 4050 years is different from what it is right now. technology itself is a reason why that acceleration has, has taken place. and in the words of the greed futurist alvin toffler back into the he said that technology feeds on itself. and that's what's happened or the last 2 decades are so microprocessor technology has become incredible and uh, gp use or graphic processing units will become incredibly fast. and other things have become, i mean, but look at your football, but here, but here's the numbers. so all those things you can just describe are going on around me, rick sanchez. i know they're happening. i, i know they're happening cuz i read and i see that all these people are doing all

these things with catchy p t e. and it's the 1st time that i, this guy who's not a computer nerd and probably isn't even very prolific when it comes to anything having to do with metrics or technology. i'm actually feeling like i've taken that a i into my world and i'm using it on a daily basis. this is what for me is free d for lack of a letter. and that's because the power now has been given to the people these complex technologies that have taken trillions of dollars to build now being used by you and i and everybody else to do college essays and, and write love letters and poems and whatnot is because now we, the common people have access to these tools. now, a word of caution, just because they're free doesn't mean they're good and that's a totally different discussion. and it doesn't mean that they've been created for our benefit. they've been created by corporations. these technologies have been

invented and invested into by profitable organizations, and that's a very, a notable point. we need to see it before we get to the warning signs and there are plenty of them. and i mentioned them as i was getting ready to introduce you. um let's, let's try and explain the data, right? so this, this data, it learns from itself and it gathers all these data. here's the way i've explained it to my friends when they've asked me, why do you use chat, g p t, and i tell them. but normally i'm a writer. so whether i'm writing this newscast, another news cast or anything that i'm gathering, i have to usually go do research. a big part of that research is google searches. i wonder 20, sometimes 30, sometimes 40, sometimes 15. google searches on different topics until i move something together. i feel maybe i'm wrong, all that check g p t eliminates those 15 google searches and turns it into what

would be i guess, for lack of a better description, maybe $34.00 or 5. and it gets all the rest of them and compiles it for me. am i wrong? no, you're right. you're absolutely right. so i see 3 types of people that exist in the world today or 2 types of mindsets that people have. number one are the ones that they see something new and they're afraid of it. they're afraid of it because they have misinformation, this information and they're negative people. they just look at the, the disasters that are having so many people are afraid of charge. if indeed, the 1st thing they think is, is my job under threat, i'm not going to lose my job. am i losing my job? that's the one category. one category of people. another category is they. they are oblivious. they have no idea what category 3 is. they don't care about it, they're busy with their lives. they just don't know. and those people are people who don't pay attention to the world around that they're so busy and focusing their lives. they just don't know what's happening. there's the last category of people

who are inquisitive. they're curious. they want to accelerate their life. they want to do more in their life. they want to find means and tools of doing it. i mean, if you're a user of microsoft excel, you're in the 3rd category for sure, because you want to actual read what you're doing with excel or word or what have you. tried to be the 3 amplifies your expression. it reduces the time that you need to spend on writing letters, reading e mails, combining information. but doing that for me, doing that at a basic level, right. we still want to look at that information and make sense of it, and make sure that it's, it's, it's doing the right thing. and if you're not in this category of people who started using ai for their benefit, you're putting yourself under pressure. and you are going to be disrupted by something else. i want you to stay where you are. because when we come back, i want to talk to you about some specific instances where people, the found problems of politics. for example,

there are certain prejudices and seems in the system with certain political figures . there's also a question about where that data is coming from and whether it's limited to a certain place that them also tried to. this is the outcome of the information. let's talk about these things with the, with you we n e and con, the future risk. who wrote the meta verse for dummies. stay right there. hey, by the way, i do have a pod cast, whereas a journalist as a latino and as an entrepreneur, i share my story with you. i try and i try and fill it as much as i possibly can. i talk about what i've learned. i've talked about lessons and i talk about this stuff that we talked about right here. on this newscast. it's called the rick sanchez podcast. i invite you to check it out. so when we come back, we'll a i and it's technology. take your job. think about that when people play in the workforce with the everywhere seems to be coming to that.

now we're going to talk about that. so speaker right there, don't go away. the the on the on the page. so glad they should cooperate. guess what is the best thing, move on to the idea about them. this is and the purpose of it fits and as it doesn't have to be complicated advocate community please. what are 2 schools

accomplishment for staff? what are some excitement? i certainly must give me a port for new car to today. the standard isn't most interested in life. it's called wheeler gardner. so kind of skip politics due to what you just said, you suggest. so i'm using menu to remind you that if you don't compete, come to the antique over to somebody and you come to the routine that they've come to a computer. definitely not. does all like supposed to be set up. thank you. so i'll fix it to only out of the media with us. that's a disclaimer, but that was the boot, industrial cleaning, the basically the 2 forces looking at them with a some of this list. now the reason why we should show credits on this pretty do we have kind of crazy word was it was the 1st one was a and then you big as a lift. so they should,

i see that i guess to notice the shape upper and lower step by step on proud those in the oven. i think it's an over some of the say, welcome back. i'm rick sanchez. we're going to talk about a lot of things including your job. and we mentioned also this, while leaders or the united states are worried about whether china is going to eventually surpass us in a development. the reality is the chinese are already had and at least administering the regulations on this new technology. i looked into it this a little bit for you. and here's what i saw. chinese officials are already moving forward on several rounds of generative a i regulations. and among the areas that they are looking to regulate is employing a i to attack the state. no good. they don't want that to happen. they don't want it to damage their national unity. they want to make sure that it uses it's not

used to terrorism or extremism or ethnic hatred or ethnic discrimination. these are the policies that they're trying to write up. also, they want to make sure it's not used for violent or sexual information. false information, as well as the content that may alter the economic or social order of their country . so those are the things are working to make sure that a, i can't be used to do, at least in china. fascinating. now, how they're there are, they're already laying. busy that out, and we here in our own country, our guys and gals are still trying to figure it out. we're back with the in con, fascinating conversation. i've been wanting to have a conversation like this with somebody who knows this stuff. and i'm sure you, you are sitting there wherever you are in the world, listening to this conversation. we're watching this conversation and probably having some questions of your own. but let's start with some of the things i

mentioned earlier. there's this big story that got a lot of play because somebody went into one of these ai platforms, like chat t p t m a wrote the following, write a poem, a positive poem about donald trump, and track g p t responded, sorry, i can't do that. i don't get in politics, but then it said that asked the same question about joe biden, and it wrote this lovely beautiful poem, as i for mentioned about the joe by the and everybody is saying i, there's a president didn't check the g p t say it's uh, it likes democrats, but not republicans or greeny, hook me up, ready is or whatever. uh, does it, you think it does? so bias is a major problem in a, in e, i, in general, right? with any form of a i. and that bias means what kind of data was a trained on who created the data, who put that data together. and there's the many cases of this where large technology companies, including google, have been criticized for a, for a, for,

for bias and ethics issues with. and it's a i, a couple of years ago they fired one of their top leading researchers attended. um they'll get through on who was leading ethics and you know, and they fired or because of whatever reason. it was a big controversy. and that's a challenge in a i, the problem is that you and i are not privy to what they do behind the big walls of their corporations. where's that data coming from? like all the data that's being used to train these generative a i it could have your in my personal data, but we don't know that we don't know where it is. who has it, how was it to use? and nobody will answer us. so that's a genuine concern. that is, is definitely the male formed right now the, there's a, there's a, there's a back track to this, however. yeah, and people have found the way to way to reverse this. so i think the better way to work around this problem that you just said is. so here's a,

here's scenario. if you tell google, go, if you tell a generative a i give me the 10 best ideas on something particular write something on politics or of something and it doesn't answer you change the question and ask it, what should i stay away from? what should i not do like a rhythm? where's the question? and it will give you the answers that there's that pathway i have found as well. and if it's a i chat to you, your, the google version or whatever is out there or coming is basically a mass thing. all this same information which is available to me most of us, but it's just warehousing and better and working through it better than i think we've got a problem because i've noticed recently and maybe i'm one of the few americans have noticed this because i can think outside of our borders, that whenever i do a google search, i get the bbc, i get the cnn. i get the new york times,

i get the washington post. whatever you know, this is the us big department website. but rarely do i get a sense to understand what some guys writing and singapore, or what they're writing and belly, or what they're writing in china, or beijing, or, or moscow or any of the other capitals of the world. it's almost like if you're western, or if you're american, right, you get a very limited supply of data from a very limited base. and i'm thinking that's what we get in a google search. that's probably the same crap or put him to a lie. so it's going to be limited as well, right? a search engine. a search engines are definitely working on an algorithm that's programmed, based on some very specific things and your right. this is a problem. americans don't see the truth about hundreds of millions of different things that are impacting the broader world. we tend to see the news and think everything is golden and rosy, and everything is great. it's not. and the lack of clarity and the lack of openness

in search engine data is a big problem that you and i cannot control. if you look at major news networks, you'll see their international coverage is different. their regional american uh coverage is different. and innocent americans don't know that the media is, you know, doing different things in, in different ways. but with going back to the google searches, there's definitely your, your search history that has, that has a bearing on it. there's definitely the where you are your i s p, and so many social political causes that can, that can get google or anybody else to say, no, we're not going to display these results. and that, compared to what you just said is that let me relation of me and the system of the data it is, it actually is. and that's, that's the reality of off off of internet and technology right now. ok, finally, last question. and i think this is the most important question for you as

a futurist. a i in general, looking at it from $1.00 to $10.00. 1 being um, this is the greatest thing that's come along in a long time. it's going to make us all better and it's going to be very good for society. 10. this sucks we're screw. where are you? as a tough question, you know, looking at industrial revolutions, creation of steam, engine, electricity automation, and a bunch of other things. i really believe a, i is, is a massive break to it's an exponential break to in, in our civilization. and this won't change how we do anything and everything. it's gonna change health care. the discovery of diseases, the discovery of molecules and how our bodies and the universe works. it could have an impact on longevity in the next 20 years. maybe our life spans can be increased by 203050, more years because of what it does and what,

what it does in terms of research. so i think from an impact perspective, a definitely a one right now in one was the maximum. and it's growing at an incredibly fast rate. we need to be able to work with that. control it regulated in order to be safe from it. yeah, yeah. and, and apparently china is a head of, most of that, of our congress is having a hard time figuring out what to do with this thing. according to the meetings that we've seen so far. and shouldn't surprise anybody. since most of those guys don't even know how to use a laptop, so probably they could ask the right questions only if they could write us the right questions, you know, congress as a long way to go when it comes to technology, knowledge and education unfortunately. yeah, that seemed obvious in some of the meetings that we've seen so far as we talked about a little bit earlier. thanks so much. we are out of time in con futurist vein future as rider of a metal verse for dummies. thank you, my friend for the delightful conversation. thanks for having me back. i hate before

we go. i want to remind you of our mission here. simple, really. we want to the silo the world. we've got to stop living in these little boxes, as i often call them. truth does not live in little boxes. the truth is everywhere . how much the interest i'll be looking for you right here. as we talk truths, where i hope to provide a direct impact. i got the take a fresh look around his life. kaleidoscopic isn't just a shifted reality distortion by power to division with no real opinions. fixtures designed to simplify will confuse who really wants a better wills,

and is it just as a chosen few fractured images presented as 1st? can you see through their illusions, going underground? can the russian states never as tired as on the phone in the most sense, community best. most all sun set up the same assistance to progress be the one else calls question about this, even though we will then in the european union, the kremlin media mission, the state on russia to day and split the ortiz vote net, keeping our video agency roughly all the band on youtube tv

services for what question did you say a request, which is the, is this the issue right now? the best thing to do. so that's it. the series for you and you have them by see it the split it up. you believe the way needs? yeah. the cost, if you're saying, you know, the image doesn't get to see that few those them. but the instrumental village doesn't notice we are gambling with the future of all mankind and we're,

we're risking it for not the, the disturbing images as a number of, as i say, is the fastest 100 in classes between 33 and that's fine and citizen police and some of the also ahead of the self goals or is the immediate expulsion of princes i'm about to den revoke specifically about the community. as well as thousands of protest system on the withdrawal of french troops from that country. on the 1st video to trace is all confirmed and the ocean that upon receive a power plants up to the controversial release often terminated waste. suassa was met with condemnation from neighboring.