pull announced internally that it was going to conduct something called a vapor intrusion test. she objected, saying that it was unsafe for employees. spoiler alert! she was right, of course, but the company pushed back hard shortly thereafter. ashley fainted at work and did not know why. this contributed to her concerns that apple had not properly tested the work side for contaminants. she also believed apple had not sufficiently informed employees of the possible health problems from chemical exposure. she was told that apple had no legal requirement to do so, but ashley was on to something. as it turned out, the building in which she worked for apple was built on a toxic waste site that was supposed to been managed by the defense giant northrop grumman, a carcinogen, called try coral. ethylene was known to have been disposed of there and had leaked into the soil. even the government admitted that the ground water at the site was contaminated. a government study in 2019 found the issue had been addressed,

but then in 2021, employees were found to have been exposed to poisonous fumes through cracks. and the floor actually filed complaints with the environmental protection agency and the national labor relations board. she also filed a whistleblower, a complaint with the occupational safety and health administration and with the u. s. department of labor. and when she approached apple about correcting all of these problems, she was told her only option was simply to work from home. more whistle blowing was to follow, actually complained that some of the apples internal policies on employee privacy, on the privacy of the public, and on the retention of documents and user data were unethical. she even filed complaints in the u. k. with the data protection information commissioner's office in the counter part office in brussels. and in dublin with the data protection commissioner. those complaints are still under investigation. not only did actually

not receive any help or satisfaction from apple. the company began to harass her. in response, she took the twitter to air her complaints. consequently, she was retaliated against repeatedly and was transferred in the end. she was fired . some of the complaints actually made are still being investigated on others. the national labor relations board found that she had told the truth, and the apple head overstepped its bounds, had retaliated against her, and had deprived employees of their constitutional rights. i have one of the meet ashley gilbert for a long time and i'm very pleased to have her with us on the show. actually welcome . that's great having you. thank you so much for having me. i'm excited to meet you too. oh, the pleasure is mine, and my goodness, there is so much to ask you when you decided to blow the whistle on wrong doing it, apple. you really decided to blow the whistle. tell us about how this whole thing got started. it was all about environmental issues at the beginning. what made you

initially decide to make that complaint? yeah, it turned into something very, very complicated, but it started into something very simple, which was, i moved into a new apartment complex and i got very ill immediately. i was on short term disability. i thought i could be dying doctor's or standing me forbid on this is i have 7 months later i discovered the apartment was built on a toxic waste split up site. and then 2 years later, i find out that my employer at that time apple was operating a secret, somebody, conductor manufacturing plant outside our windows mentoring a bunch of solve them into our windows. so there was solid exposure of that was the root cause of my illness. and through that experience, i learned about the split up sites. i learned about how to do that. and there's a lot of ways whether you're at work or just, you know, in your home that you can be so specific. make you very ill. i assumed i was not the only one who did and i was not so i undertook to try to figure out what was

going on and report it to never been easy to use. so we finally got to the bottom of it. it is being investigated what was implicated, but through this i kind of became when i call an armchair expert since the clean up site and environmental laws. so all of that was happening in 2020. i was not satisfied with the government responses, so i ended up publishing an extra jose, what happened to me and asking for more intervention. and the beginning of 2021. and right at that time, an email comes into my inbox with apple saying that they want to test her office for me for intrusion. and that's all it says. but i had become an expert at this point. so i knew exactly what that term and i'm and yeah, i had briefly been informed that my apple office was something called a super bowl sunday site by a friend who broke the are not at all. so i live in that office since 2017 and she's like, you know, that's a really bad super fun to site to kind of explain that it was about solution and

toxic waste. but i've kind of put it aside. um and, but that all, you know, the lights went off when i saw that email, that what they're saying is they want to test and see if that toxic waste from superfund site in the ground water and slow was pushing up indoor, indoor air when we were at our dest, you are breathing it in. and through this experience, i also learned that in silicon valley to the most common chemicals are checked for o. s o n t, rush citizens and very, very dangerous. so from that email, i started looking through the documentation, start asking questions, i'm very dissatisfied with all the answers, i'm say, not just from my employers oversight of the office, but how the agent overseeing it, which is not at all, they kind of neglected it weren't paying attention and then as soon as i start asking questions and identifying issues which the later confirmed, all my concerns were correct and they have the same concerns. apple started just,

you know, trying to shut me out, retaliated, told me not to tell anyone else. they didn't want me to tell the government what they were doing. i'm so, hey, awesome, choose from there. good lord, we should say to that a superfund site is a site that is so toxic. it's so dangerous that the environmental protection and ministration has to come in at a cost sometimes of billions of dollars to try to clean it up. but like any government bureaucracy, sometimes they do a great job. sometimes they do a terrible job. and it sounds like in this case they did a terrible job. a very interesting you, what you said is correct. but like to add another angle which may appreciative someone that works in the federal government, there's a lot of politics about funding and to clean it up and especially considering a lot of these sites, even it's not directly r d o d, right? there's a lot of the stuff or is it was a lot of military operations. so how does the federal government force itself to

clean up stuff when they don't want to? how do they force corporations do when corporations ultimately, if they're big enough to just say no, i'm not going to do anything. so it's a lot of compromise influence. some funding, some tax, their dollars goes into trying to help clean this up, which is very demoralizing. when you will be these huge companies with so much money made a mass that should just clean it up. and it seems like the rest of your whistle blowing happened in very rapid succession after your initial revelations about the environmental issues and the fact that apple was literally sitting on this toxic superfund site. what then led to your decision to make additional disclosures? yeah, so i wonder this experience, even starting the apartment and seeing the response to the government, you know what i just said? now i'm kind of thing of stockholm syndrome. of like, let me explain why they tolerate companies to not clean this stuff, but when it is all started, it was shocking to me that you could have this kind of pollution that science and

medicine show can cause cancer until people don't even tell people they do the very bare minimum of cleaning it up. and then when you raise concerns, even when you are very ill and all my symptoms turned out to be solvent exposure, all of them were diagnosed by an occupational exposure doctor is like all that is solid research. you don't have a mask, you don't cancer, you don't have an aneurism without, you know, all the other stuff as before. but even then the responses were very clear to me that these companies and even the government didn't really care if i lived or died . it was just kind of business and as i start looking into that more, this is a huge issue, especially for folks who don't have a lot of resources for me or refer me to just from a nation along toxic hotspots, or in areas with black and native people with people living in poverty, but even what is it? so it's kind of like a big own sacrifice done for the use of property or just to let some people that i asked me that was so jarling and upsetting and fundamentally changed me in the way

that i knew that my relationship with these companies, including my employer, so when my employers response to my questions about my office, especially after everything i've just gone through and they knew it was chemical exposure to uh, it showed me they don't care if i live or die either. and in fact, they want to cover it up and make sure i don't tell any of my co workers that are housed to be a risk just because a liability. so for me, you shifted somebody of find me where i lost any of that, you know, assume good intent or cognitive dissonance you have at work when you don't necessarily align with your employer. so use they see something kind of upset to you leave it to the side. and i was just done because they were, they saw me completely disposable. i am working, you know, 80 hour weeks for nearly 7 years. this company i did everything i could to try to help them with their products and problems in teams and make things better. and they literally are just like, don't tell other people that they're gonna be cancelled to. so as they started

retaliating, i really, i had no rose colored glasses left and i'd love to know what, what was the reaction from your colleagues. you'd been at up at apple for almost 6 years. were people supportive? after all this, this directly impacted them where they helpful to you. did they pull you aside privately and offer support or did they just put their heads down and walk away and try to protect themselves? so i was a very unique and st culture guy. there's not a problem comparable to many other companies. if any, they find themselves with extreme secrecy. they brag about all their x, t, i a and say they're like the private sector, c i a. and so they really, the culture is based on not sure information, probably not turn information with each other, not doing things. i'm pretty sure they are using the id control system for our disclosures when they were coughing in a row, you know, so it's very departmental eyes, and that just means that most of our friends are coworkers, right?

when you're told anything about your work and they started giving this service to jail for basically we can see you just kinda keep it internal. so most of my friends were my co workers and the ones that were along with all of this are very supportive to they were outraged just along with me as everything that we're seeing . but then apples telling me not to talk to my co workers to not tony want to know what's going on. and i go along with it for a little while because i was terrified of them. sure. here. but then i kind of break when they're retaliating more clearly covering up the environmental issues really probably not until a day. and so i kind of the 1st taking a public was taking a public just to the communication tools with the company. and it's also on top of a, for apple that was public because they're so secretive and they were just an outpouring . the people who also have used your stories of trying to raise real concerns and just being immediately reevaluated upon and being covered up. so many people don't to tell anyone. so there is a huge response there that was positive, but then there was also backlash from

a lot of people. that for some reason are used to or rely on the system of secrecy saying you're leaving your concerns about work conditions. don't tell anyone there's already backlash there. and then when i was ordered to go in public in august when i went on twitter and just start sharing stuff. so it was clear, my employer was doing nothing helpful. and just mostly in this area. yes. so i said no document and time you know the code, what's going on i, there's also a mix. there were more co workers, the team ford probably as well, and also share their stories. but then a lot of backlash, a lot of smears, wanted division, and apples and fueling that, of course, for the last couple years to try to get everyone to find each other. because if we have any hope of actually improving things as workers, we need to organize. so they seem to be doing everything they can to not have us do that and all of their sectors. disney retail, isn't it? i'm sorry to interrupt you in, in the intern between your revelations and the corporate decision to try to push you out. what was it like for you inside apple? were you kept at arm's length?

did the company try to implement any changes based on your revelations or did they want to fight from the beginning human resources, for example, which was supposed to protect you? certainly didn't protect you. i'll also point out that apple ceo, tim cook, sent out a company wide email about you, that at least to my eyes seemed like a friend. yes. so much about one of the reasons i think i didn't even think that my installations would go anywhere. so it was immediately just documenting everything kind of gone and this would be lost to them. probably have to take the public because they raise real concerns about face the, my bosses only, not the telling one of my safety concerns. i go to h r and this is like the bare minimum of what a sharp should do is like explain labor laws to executive. but in fact, she were telling me it's against me openly and refuses to explain the safety productions to him that employees can talk about safety in when she's doing that.

it just, it kind of showed me, okay, everything's set up now to push me out. there not seem, it doesn't matter what my position was, what i complex, what my now you know is network to months. so your doctors and the fees didn't matter. they were going to, it's near me, destroying me, push me out, find ways to fire me. i'm so they kept doing that and that's, you know, it's come out. that's a very strong pattern from them. um and yeah, i closer to me getting fired. i, the bosses, did it 2 boxes. one of them was giving me a bunch of projects that were set up a little. let's make everyone upset of me. and then the other ones are moving me from projects and emails and not responding to my emails, which are 2 of the things that they love to do and they situations. so yeah, i be removed from even my actual responsibilities. i'm being repeatedly told not to talk to co workers not to organize. and then as i'm pushed out on leave within a couple of days,

i'm here and there is meetings about me across your organization saying they're gonna like talk about me in the next all him, which was clear to me that i was gonna be fired. they already knew they were gonna fire me, otherwise they're not talking about me while i'm at all hands. so you know, they're already showing everyone. okay. we're pretending ashley's out on this. we, that we're cleaning is not tentative. so we're clearly gonna fire her. we're in for it. so at that point, a lot of people pull away. i start losing a lot of friends. they're scared, i don't blame them because of apple sit culture. it's a real fear of retaliation. and i've had to deal with that said last, most of my friends, they were co workers, the ones are still there. some of them even left the country. right? yes. so this is what i want to. i kind of says in addition to the relation to the environment still issues the end, the age and the culture of secrecy, i felt charges about that, that email that tim hooks that which i think definitely reference me. i think at least one other person and was definitely a threat to his entire staff. he said,

but anything internally confidential and they will fire anyone who shares anything internal. and he was referencing a meeting where he talked about pay equity and benefits. so i mean, not, you know, it's only out to about 50, so have many very clear, like we are standing behind our culture. so i about church, you know, or be agreed with me. that email is a violation of federal law. most of apples and the asian employment policy is also violate federal law. i sent them like 20 different documents, including the employment agreement i signed when i joined. and so they're working on it sounds like a complaint. now let's, if apple doesn't settle, it wouldn't go to court. an apple i expect is gonna be used on dozens of charges against these policies because they're basically illegal. and so i'm hoping starts to help a see change at apple where employees can try to speed up a little bit. i think it was a very long time. no, because everyone, i'm so used to secrecy and intimidation and feel ashley, thank you very much. hold on to we are going to continue our conversation with

apple whistleblower ashley gilbert about her experience with a wide variety of whistle blowing at the tech giant. we're going to take a short break and then come back to talk about life after whistle blowing state to . 2 the russian states never as one of the most sense community was all sense and the in the system must be the one else holes. question about this, even though we will ben in the european union,

the kremlin machine, the state on russia to day and split the smooth neck, given our video agency, roughly all the band on youtube, the tenant services for the question, did you say they requested the soon as 2016 numerous monuments to serve you as soldiers in poland, ukraine and the baltic states have been destroyed all vandalized fish this the body must be the most certainly within. yeah. unless or even some others could. i ask if i don't think so. that's the most on whether it's it's flash or almost 3 of the police government denies the rule of soviet sonya is in the victory of a naziism. and is it raising historical memories of world war 2? because that is the new story. although it did seem to notice the regimes of

trustees would remain, thinks in people's consciousness forever. but as long as the rest of the b a is profitable and brings dividends, you are willing to have a to rewrite the cost. if you don't speak up the, i'll provide i need the seats in the car to talk. so i need to release the welcome back to the whistle blowers. i'm john kerry onto we're speaking with ashley gilbert. a whistleblower from apple who called attention to environmental dangers at the world's biggest company as well as privacy concerns and other issues. and as you might expect, she paid for her whistle blowing with her career. actually good to have you with us . thanks again for joining us. you john. actually tell us about some of the legal

issues involved in your whistle blowing. it seems to me that here you were making protected whistleblower disclosures at the very least the company should have been investigating your complaints. but as often happens they attack the messenger. apple is represented by one of the most powerful law firms in the world of melvin and myers. did you have any representation? was there anybody out there to protect your interests? or were you on your own? as i was on my own in every way possible. obviously, i think the other issue would be huge, that corporations that have way too much control. and so for lawyers, they were all intimidated by how complicated the case was. and then apple's notoriously very difficult and poor. so they didn't want to go to work. they want to get an end, the federal and i did not want to do that. i wanted to make sure that what they did was known as they have to fix the issues. so i ended up, i was halfway through law school, so i'm just taking it on representing myself. which allows me to be

a bit more at dial 2 because there are a number of issues from environmental, the retaliation dose. ok, so what's the lowercase? so i can just research and learn, instead of having to have like 7 firms, which is what actually apple has. now, the firm you mention was the one of the 1st ones they were saying who sent me harassing emails about privacy concerns. but they've sense iron or, and m, w, e and morgan lewis and probably more firms. i don't even know about a best partners. i 60 huge team, but i was fortunate enough, but i will violated a number of laws agreed justly with a ton of documentation and evidence. and i was able to get that in hand. why things can be the bottom, mary, i'm going to in every case i am currently 5. 015. they look. they lost 5. incredible, incredible. as only you know, i know, i'm sorry, please go right ahead. oh i was going to say it's really david and goliath and it shows like the why so here, because these companies the lower be charge for that same cook email. you mentioned

they last in january of this year and or be set up i like that or why they hired in our me and morgan lewis attorney's, including a previous, at our b board member. so an executive for the agency and somehow tried to do this like a p o outside of a normal appeal process. so i had the not only respond to those of some arguments of you still lose, but also say if you're violating the constitution and industry the procedures that we stop and i want, but it's like why i'm not even a licensed attorney. and i have to say, previous, easy to read. so i, you know, i think there's just shows why these companies get away with this stuff. there's not a lot of people who are equipped to try to do this and mostly, or was an embryo. most of them are captured by companies like apple, whether it's funding advertising or they need an hour and an app store and they need their pod cast uh, be able to go to. there's always influences that just make people not want to challenge apple or who. right. and as i mentioned a few minutes ago,

whenever the government investigated your allegations, they found that you were telling the truth. several of the things that you revealed are still being investigated, but in the end, apple threw you out. was there anything at all that you could do about that? i know that you have a lawsuit pending. you have multiple law suits pending. but as best as you're able, can you tell us a little bit about the personal impact on you and how you become recovering or so i want to say like, not only was i right, i was more right than i knew. so as i've been doing player class and trying to figure out what actually happened, i wasn't spend it just a couple of days after the a informed awful. they would be inspecting my office due to my disclosures about apple's circle. now, why? and that was the state of justification was actually told us what you're doing. we need to come see they got a bunch of issues. i got in trouble. and then i was fired, an apple kid, that inspection and all the issues from me trying to. but i found out i lose a number of those type of stories where it was already really bad and it was far

worse even than i knew. so as i'm digging, i'm pressing these agencies and really trying to make sure the issues are addressed . i have retaliation cases, the us department of labor and, and i'll be in california department of labor, but it's taking a very long time. and i kinda see these bottles as a primary, secondary and tertiary where the primary was. all the environmental stuff. secondary was seeing all the retaliation and reporting the retaliation and trying to organize with people to get that address and try to get them to stop by at least a little bit. and then the tertiary is just realizing how you protections whistleblower is actually out of this country i, i would not actually use the word protection for any of our law, right? you have a chance maybe of a remedy. you're after. the fact if you go during adjudication process that will be traumatizing on it. so in what you're doing, but i'm trying to bring to life just how i, you know, it's working. it's designed by the industry,

but for whistle blowers at destroying the us. we're already traumatized. we're already ostracized. going years without a government saying this person should not have been fired. just that statement. you know, you have trouble finding were people that your credibility, you like even if you decide you want to do with the lower theater. so that open question of like was this person right? i was lucky enough that i got for your documents way earlier home saying like i was right. so that's where that's it's ordinarily rare. so i been writing about the current state of whistle blowing, both with legal and posing nancy, but also just the emotional term. well, i went through what so many of us do, were you just feel like you last you put your place in the world and the call yourself, you don't know how to fit in. lots of depression. i use of all my savings. i still can't find a job, i am pro se on all my cases. so i'm doing that while i'm trying to find work and then advocating along the way. it's when just kind of thrown and i'm one of those whistle blowers where i never even thought i was,

was the blowing at 1st. and it seemed like just something you'd need to do, right, of like ratings like that. and then, you know, then you're carried on a stop for your life is never the same. so i'm on that path. and as i'm seeing things where i'm hoping things could be improved in some way, even if it's education, i'm trying to do that. so publishing articles, speaking about the experience and really trying to help people understand that whistle or who may come for there's a very high percentage, their life will just be destroyed, whether they're right or wrong. yeah. and that those 70 just pretty darn close to 100 percent or not. yeah. actually gilbert, thank you so much for joining us and thank you for your courageous whistle blowing . thank you john. thank you. thank you. to actually do of it blew the whistle at the largest company in the world. apple. it can't possibly have been easy. you heard it yourself. it could not have been a decision to be taken lightly,

but it's always worth it in a perfect world. we wouldn't need whistleblowers, we wouldn't need them because companies, governments, and individuals would do the right thing. they wouldn't lie, cheat, steal, and try to cut corners. they would have the best interest of the public in mind, but that is not in real life. we have whistle blowers because we need the. we have whistle blowers because at least somebody goes into government for the banking or into the corporate world. with a clear cut sense of right and wrong. yes, the price of the blowing can be very high. but where would we be without be ashley gilby except the world? i'm grateful for people like her. thanks for joining us for another episode of the whistle blowers i'm john to reaku. we'll see you next time. 2 2 2 2 2 2 the

oh, what else? seemed wrong? just don't you have to safe house to come and engagement because the trail when so many find themselves will support. we choose to look for common ground the the at the end of the 18th century, great britain began to conquer and colonize australia. from the very beginning of the british penetration to the continent, natives were subjected to severe violence and deliberate extra patient. according

to modern historians, in the 1st 140 years, there were at least 270 massacres of local depot. any resistance to the british was answered with double cruelty. hundreds of natives were killed for the murder of one settler. indigenous australians were not considered complete people. no wild beast of the forest was ever hunted down with such unsparing perseverance as they are. men, women, and children are shot when ever they can be met with squatter. henry myrick wrote in a letter to his family in england, in $1846.00 plus strategy as fast as these rightly described as blood soaked in races. if at the beginning of colonization, there were one and a half 1000000 indigenous people living on the continent, then by the beginning of the 20th century, their number had degrees still 100000 people. despite the indisputable historical facts, the problem of full recognition of the crimes of white australians against aborigines

has not been resolved so far. the infantry is porch by these apc's is now retrieve are teasing or i guess the visits these upper rotors are region to the bunk. the western media is claims. the ukranian army has reached the russian defenses with a very different picture on the ground of the more than 80 protesters were arrested on friday alone. as a 4th consecutive day of protests, brock armenia over the government, surrendered. i'm going to car box as are by john kenya and india demand reforms.