the going underground can the, from the front lines of the ukraine conflict are senior correspondent, reports on the latest the tim spike. he has forces to reg, gain loss, positions coming up, the expensive mom power. and next, it was supplied hardly claimed us journalist seymour her sledges. it was washington who blew up ignored stream pipelines, arts of fear of losing influence in europe. we chronicled those revelations in his latest article, marking the one you wrote a bursary of the under sinks of the time. on the russian defense ministry release has been you will put commander of the black sea fleets alive and well. it comes, it made western media and t x naming the middle was killed during

a recent ukrainian. that's the primary expenditure. the one minute past 7 pm in the russian capital this tuesday. my names, you don't know me like this is the news hour or 2 russian forces have repel the series of attacks. in the photos you region, with dozens of personnel and nature supplied military equipment destroyed, that is, according to the russian defense ministry, uncovered themselves, kias, barkers are showing increased fatigue over ukraine's stoled country offensive. with more on all of that from the broad. here's ortiz broadcast, do you have, as it is being 2 hours since you pains assault? he began ukrainian mac vehicles of budding, thousands of slate dead to die with more, keep coming across. you will get

a type of fit different still on us. you to be evil. months pro well my stomach maybe was a special forces recall and dispensed as units. tracts. the enemy and relays coordinates to the big guns pallets is roughly 2 inches. and the guy did me, sol, teams. it is now being 2 hours since the ukrainians. deep any military launched on the soul above with the outskirts of which we are now. so i thought it was your region via so these are going so far off of the gradients of last and again for about 2 and a half hours. 3, all but plus one. but to go over that and have a 300 meters to the north of it and another up as a 100 meters north of draft. as of the minutes of the hours drive on to a chorus of hundreds of bus, the shelves and rockets,

training and losses mounted june should hold down the shore and the horizon, a burning ukrainian tank excludes. it's a new nation cookie golf, sending up a file boat, little closer, another ukrainian homage vehicle, an american supply. max proof spews plumes of black smoke up into the sky. for tally rises and rises proves more and more reserves into the battle to save the situation. and what, what, what the show room is in the middle, sorry, you try to appeal it all, love all, no lives, nobody the to you and you could probably go to the team and you can nobody else and you come

oh, think i put a summer is put to it's a good with a washer and you can choose that. i know you guys are gone for last night, but i'm also by us. and then before we share the permission to smell, that would soon be posted to the test. 7 hours in the battle was winding down. 11 ukrainian vehicles had been hate, destroyed. lease is when the drove finally found us. how itself, fleet has a way we have less than the seconds warning, the building to show that there was a very suspect, you saw it even

in these hills splits mass find room per cubic footage for new at this with the insurance, you have to do that because this is stephanie, so white, the issue would you choose show for admission for sure. you have to do that. it was no to you, but to make sure that that arch ended and the ukranian drew left carefully moved away. i think it had been a long and exhausting mode. i think with your staff the,

the job was done this day ukraine had done through tens of millions of dollars in. yeah, i knew the shipment compensation for nothing. they had not gained. i mean, the, it is quite in doubt loss since this morning. it is being 7 hours since you train the job. it's attack you these over. now almost a dozen vehicles either destroyed the damage as a result of the auxilary fire. we're also not thousands upon thousands of bodies. now scouts of the strip live a field of dog games will try again. it's not today but tomorrow for i guess the of the, from the bubble. yeah. so i thought it was,

you have region the, the current world order that is ruled by the few must be changed. that's the message from india on the final day of the 70. 8th, you, in general assembly new delhi is external refers, administer, saves a multi pour, the world is emerging and the global side is finally getting a larger voice. in our deliberations, we often advocate the promotion of federal space stalled from time to time. respect for the un charter is also involved. but for all the top, as it is still a few nations shaped the agenda and seek to define the knots. this cannot go on indefinitely, nor will it go unchallenged. affair, equitable and democratic order was surely a much,

once we all put online students was also noteworthy. that that in the us initiative, the african union was admitted as a prominent member of the g 20. by doing so, we gave voice to an entire continent which has long been its due this significant step in reform should inspire the united nations a much older organization. to also make the security council contempt it will coming up soon, the united nations security college. so convenience on russia's request to address the 1st anniversary of the north stream pipeline. sabotage will be covering the event here on our t international state streams. the another startling report has once more put the bite and administration in the spotlight. it's been

a year since the north stream pipelines were blowing up, but the pieces are being put together as to who was behind the last few lecture prize award winning journalist seymour hersh made headlines with his initial reporting on the sabotage. and now he's back with more revolutions or the binding. the ministration blew up the pipelines, but the action had little to do with winning or stopping the war in ukraine. it resulted from fears in the white house, the germany would waiver and turn on the flow of rushing gas in germany and then nato, for economic reasons would fall under the sway of russia. and it's extensive and inexpensive. natural resources invest, follow the ultimate fear that america would lose its longstanding primacy in western europe. another bombshell revelation by seymour hurst with his most recent article, it really reveals the decision as to why washington decided to blow up the north stream pipelines and why it shows the timing that it did. it all has to do with the

influence that washington was afraid. that russia would exert on western europe and germany with the sale of cheap natural gas act, expected to go through these north stream pipelines that at that time of the attack were actually not flowing any natural gas. now, in terms of the sabotage operation and the associated planning, this is the that amounted to a delicate several months projects in which everything was done to cover up the sea ice tracts. i mean, all of the documents associated with this operation works typed up on type writers, they were immediately destroyed after the operations completion. and all reports were made exclusively to the head of the c. i a who then passed information on to us president joe biden. the white house was isolated some of the goings on. your also various reports and updates from the field were directly provided to c. i. a director bill burns, was the only link between the planners and the president who authorized the mission to take place on september 26th 2022. once the mission was completed,

the types of papers and carbons were destroyed, thus leaving no physical trace, no evidence to be dug up later by a special prosecutor or presidential historian, you could call it the perfect crime. according to hers, washington also chose to attack the north stream pipelines because it didn't feel like there would be any problem about denying involvement in the attacks. it's all something that russia is. foreign ministry is calling a very important series of revelations. the hash investigation is cooler than will to gate. american presidents have never gone these the before, the bonding administration is obliged to provide this star a response on all counts. on top of that, hers also says that german chancellor hold off schultz knew about preparations for the attacks in advance actually. and it's really not all that surprising, considering what hearse calls a legacy of us politicians trying to weaponized natural resources for political purposes. something that obviously continues into the current day as we see with

this intent on destroying the north stream pipelines. if uh, if from russian base, then there will be we, there will be no longer on our steam to we, we will bring it into i m. and i think the administration is very gratified to know that north stream too is now as you like to say, uncles metal at the bottom of the seat. these pipelines that is more streamlined, worse for me to we're not pumping gas into your data offers. tremendous strategic opportunity for um, for the years to come. so it's even more bombshell revelations from seymour hersh and a clear us mel intends when it came to north stream pipelines. i mean, it's obviously going to be a lot more difficult for washington to keep up this narrative of denial and then actually expect people to listen just throughout the doubles piece, former austria and foreign administer a car in can. i saw spoke to archie and speculated on why germany, where most of the gas was heading, didn't do much in response to the new extreme pipeline latasha. or why the german,

i'm sorry, it just cut another react it. so that's why the in wives brushing, well, sorry, choose to do some little effect, find them all together. the have to give. so that is, it will probably be a very nice to situation for german need to accept the fact that it's made to allies how slowly as our importance energy infrastructure, no need for drumming needs before the terminal is by the, all of those companies which, where as to are involved in the problem for sure, because it's not only a matter of liability political, my affinity responsibility is all for the fall of compensation for established. so that much sooner or later that we have to be some sort of legal dispute verification. i do hope that that will be some of the station is constant because

that exchange dotted lines, the corporation sports are. that of course, would be a long problem. all my life fission. but when it comes to business, such as energy, i don't expect that russia is such a site really change uh, once again. uh, it's a, it's a customer because it's new customer with the customer and i'll uh, states and i like in the uh, the agents to china is doorstep. i'm be owned in the midst of escalating tensions with beijing. the us space for us is considering establishing a unit in japan. does it come under of the group? did not name a site proposed site for the unit, but at a clear purpose was not built into either just said it may supplement already deployed us personally in japan. no, it wouldn't be washington's 1st foray into the pacific region. but the newest

branch of its military, either the space force also established an indo pacific union unit to excuse me, stationed in hawaii, less than a year ago. that was follow then by the launch of a subordinate i'd fit inside korea in december. but that's across live now, to archie, contributor carl john for his. take carl, good to see you today. let me put a to directly. why is the u. s. space for 6 funding? it's presence in asia and why is this happening now? this is part of the long term trend of us militarize in the asia pacific region. the trend started with the so called pivot to asia under the 1st obama term. and by, by pivot team, they don't mean pivoting economically, they mean pivot the military asset and us space for us as part of that pivot and yours has always been interested in the militarization of space. and in fact it

back in the 1950s a minute us military. i actually had a proposal to detonate a nuclear weapon on the moon just to show off the soviets. and thankfully, that crazy plant did not get to carry out. and in 2000, no 8, both china and russia actually put together a draft to the u. n. know, as the treaty of prevention of the placement of weapons and the older space. united states oppose the draft claims for itself, lives of self defense, and again 2014 the general assemblies of you. in past 2 resolutions, the 1st resolution, the prevention of arms spacing, our racing outer space caused all states, particularly those was major space capability to contribute actively to peaceful use of outer space. and again, there's a $178.00 country voltage in favor with 2 of the stations and the to space or israel and united states. the 2nd resolution,

no 1st placement of weapons and outer space. again, it was a 126 countries voting favor and 4 against 4 countries are gains or georgia is real ukraine and united states. us has always been seeking the webpage nice in space. number 2 is all advantage in this particular case. us wants to block 2nd am china and russia as nuclear deterrent. because for much of the cold war, the mutually assured destruction mat dockery is what, how these between the 2 superpowers and us. what is trying to do right now is trying to degrade russia and china is nuclear capability, so that us can wage conventional welfare without fear of nuclear retail lease. well this is the point as well, is because for, for many years the u. s. has being rallying against the build up in space of that

of arms from other from other countries. i'm yet know, it seems to be there on the very front fault of doing this, going to asia placing at these bases. these units in no time is back yard. let's, let's face it, let's say it as it is. so there's only one direction of travel. this is going on. that's to a build up and militarize ation of space. are you worried? well, i am very worried because right now we are heading to work a possible big confrontation between those 3 nuclear arms superpowers, the china, russia, and united states. and us is one that's aggressively pushing this to work. as you say, the backyard of china and also russia us already place the so called that system to terminal high velocity psychology to area depends, which is the anti ballistic missile system. in south korea, the aim is, of course,

to shoot down any possible launch from either china or, or rush up before they could reach, you know, continental north america. and this is, this is a continuing trend that we're seeing and there's no letting up. of course i'm worried at can i just touch upon something as well? because the details were sketchy on this karl. the commander of the us base for said that his units would supplement american military installations already in the asia pacific region. how would you translate that? well, you guys already lined the whole pacific rim waves is military bases. and so this is just an additional deployment, and they're talking about a space capable of yours is actually pretty worried about the growing space capability of both russia and china. us military depends on your system for

targeting. and, but you, my china and russia also have their own satellite system. you, russia was a loss, not nasa. and china with this made or system, or china actually have more satellites in space, then uh, gps at the moment is the chinese page or system have 45 active site licensed based . whereas the gps only have $31.00. so now us are trying to gain advantage over its rivals by placing it's a space capabilities closer to what matt imagined to our it's adversary, china and russia. ok, carl, thank you. as all was archie calculator, carl is giving us his take today life. thank you. the russian defense ministry has published for the it's showing the commander of the black sea fleet, admiral of victor circle of alive and working that may come as a shock to those who'd read that he'd been killed as a result of ukraine's recent attack on the russian fleet

h q in the port city of service, double r t charlotte duban c talked to 3 developments earlier over the last few days since the attack in quite may on friday. the 22nd, the western media has been parsing the claims by ukraine, that it's really taking this huge scalp of this black fleet. see command one of the most senior men in the russian navy and not something over. no, but they talked about this as being a devastating attack, a huge blow, but this would make a massive whole, a new russian defense system and really have been rocketing on about that. let's take a listen to how this has been portrayed in the west and media may jump low against russia, ukrainians, special forces, say the commander of russians, black sea fleet was killed in last week's attack on. so that's the poll. now these comes out, the ukranian military claims that struck the headquarters of russia's black sea naval fleet and occupied crimea,

or his ministry of defense said one service man was missing. who was with no take. the russians have not admitted to the losses of these offices, including the overall commander of the black sea fleets of it to so close a last. we can now claim that this is fake news because in the video that was being released on tuesday following the russian ministry of defense, we can see that victor circle of is alive. and while i'm was taking caught in a meeting. but of course, this is not the 1st time we've had claims volley of ukraine inside about something major happening with it that's on the offensive with it that's of attacks that have happened. and really we see now on several occasions the claims are made. and then they have to roll back on that front house across the line. that is ostensibly the message from the united nations body for human rights. after parson, lines, french women would be prohibited from wearing

a village next year. some of them pick it. france has an obligation to take all the appropriate measures to modify any social cultural patterns that have based on the idea open priori or superiority of these are these exist in general. the human rights office says that no one should impose on the woman what she needs to wear or not to wear. with the un condemnation came off to the french sports minister, declared that no member of the french olympic delegation would be allowed to wear head coverings of next summer's event. the international olympic committee is not barking the french bond and as urge the country to consider the clothing, not as a religious symbol, but a cultural norm. the french and i spend coming shortly after the nation for bade school girls from telling the full that's a bad garments leading to keep a debate in the country and beyond on how intrusive the state should be. an individual clothing choices. let's profit. i've talked to more walsman mart as

a commentator in middle east issues on lecture of lebanese introduction diversity. i'm more f university in love and a welcome to the program. horace has bottom french female athletes at competing in the olympics from wearing the veal calling the ruling in line with the countries quotes regime of strict secular is of their country. their rules is not for a that's a k a a. so i'm a phobia my friend, it's not a rule it is, it's not before yet, and i'm pretty sure. and when i say this, i mean it, because if it were actually against all women who we're who job, we would have heard something coming out of friends against, for example, french nuns who are part of the vatican athlete team, which would take part in the opening ceremony of the paris olympics of 2024, but we did not hear anything about that. what is a french non is part of the running team, for example,

was wearing his job decides to take part in the opening ceremony. will friends obliged her to take off her job? i beg to differ. this is why it is a target, and it's a war against islam in general. and most of them women in specific. i don't think that the french policy makers, the legislators, are aware of how risky and dangerous this kind of a pressure, i guess most of them women is they started with it in schools and universities and then public institutions. and there are some people will say that this is frances right now, it's not there, right? it's not the right to disagree to the beliefs of human beings. and i think that the one was pretty strict when they said that funds has gone too far. this time, let me put the point you though that every other participate that the games will have to abide by strict uniform rules. why should anybody, most of the included be allowed to differ from that? shouldn't there be a set rules and clothing that everyone abides by? otherwise it just starts to get chaotic?

a this is a, some sort of a not, i'm not going to say no debate, but this debate doesn't have a basis. because my friend, what would a woman covering only her hair due to the rules? how was it bending the rules? if this is part of her religious belief, this is part of her faith. if and non wishes to run while covering her hair. why should i be against her as almost one wants to take part in any athletics, sports and any sports in the olympics? why should i be a guest or covering her hair as much as i am, i guess? recovering her knee or covering her elbow or covering her neck, it's her body, her choice small, i got a secular country at dealing in this case, sports have to worry about somebody's religious beliefs. it's, it's about support, 1st and foremost as well. that's what we need to exactly, it's about sports. this is what we need to ask friends wise friends, so obsessed about women wearing or not wearing that?

her job weiss friends obsessed about women wearing a bias or a full grown, a garments or not. why is, are they ever obsessed about nuns wearing their habits? i don't see that. and the french media, then why is there a war against muslims in france? why is it that it was the moment? why can i all you got not go to a french beach and where my brit kenia and swim the way that i swear i'm in italy and spain and the u. k. in cuba and of all over the place. why is it the french women are not allowed to live like they want? but it's okay, for example, to see a man identifying as a woman, leading in women athletes. that's not a guess the rules, but a woman choosing to cover her hair is a guess a roof that's just obscene. that's a pathetic. that's a visa corporation of the face of women in general. and most of the women and specific and it's a big question. maurice as to why spend so upset about these issues instead of obsessing about making the ceremony a successful one, making the powers olympics and olympics, or a ceremony or

a party or no. so that's $64.00 to $40.00, that the whole world will talk about. why are they focusing on this specific issue? because it comes from a background of a 6 terry newsome slumber phobia and of via vile targets against sloman specific well, in english, the woman in particular, it's an interesting point to make as well because, you know, i think you're right readable flags, for instance, greenville, arm buttons are lied to be water then, and that's a very political statement as well. but not everybody agrees. i didn't want to go there. i yeah, the interesting point i know that you mentioned was that on gender obviously to participate in because the female sports um that's exciting by fronts as well because people wouldn't say it on your more level here when they hear me english the moment. no, no, but when people hear me talking about this, i'm speaking on behalf of muslim woman. this is what they see. and then they might get attacked by saying, well, why didn't you say a thing? when could tar and the world cup was banding. the rainbow flag or banding things

that are supposedly legal in the west. well, guitar has its cultural, strict cultural conservative laws. funds is about difficult, the need that they've got to the best fit. where's the, the best it was, the liberty in allowing the women to be who they are, wears the liberty in allowing other people which are men to assume that they are women, take hold of the women, athletes and sports and say, well, we are with that is legal because we are not against friends, gender, we are not against a, for example, whom sexuality but we are against women who would like to wear more quotes. where's the bad part? and the woman wearing more clothes. i don't understand it now. it's ok for men to be women and to change their gender and play the sports of women. but it's not ok for women to decide what they want to wear, what's the liberty and that, that is hypocrisy, my friends. just finally, they may say that that is being forced upon them. some women that choice of wearing

that is not there is perhaps in a, in a very, at patriarchal sense that it's, it's a meal guardian doing that. um, they should have, we, we want to take that choice either their hands to make everything equal, that they don't have to, to where that it's not a whole. yeah. and, and the sorting for, you know, it's not up for them to look whether in the sporting field or any other place. i got asked about the lot, i could ask, why are you wearing his job? where are you forced? actually i had a fight with my parents to where the her job they didn't want me to wear the heads up. this is might choice. this is why yeah. my life travel the entire world, wearing my her job with my faith, with my customs as a muslim woman. but when it comes to this kind of speech, when saying that it is a picture, okay, we want to help them by helping them. but by, by not wearing it all by taking it off, helping them. how exactly would you help? it has civic jewish woman to take off her, his job. i would never see that in europe then why is it.