to the age of 76, for the question, did you say stephen twist, which is the time action or nancy, and welcome back to going underground broadcasting over on the world from the u. a since last year. and they to a nation authorities of so to prevent john list from linking ukraine leaders, zalinski denazi's, the media black outreach example of fios as when in the past few days, the entire parliament of canada is previously supported. catastrophic was on libya

or in syria, give a standing ovation to zalinski and a nazi assess veteran. joining me now from l. a. to find out what is going on with canada, and it's billions to you. great is someone who recently ran. there's a candidate for the people's party, off canada, david finalizes, a canadian form, it litigated to an award winning viva for i rambler. david, thanks so much for coming on. i mean, what has happened to your country? i used to live in vancouver. i knew the vancouver sun was pretty right wing back in those days, but really the entire parliament to the old politicians, the defective, celebrating the holocaust. it wasn't they, they have no idea what they're doing. that's. that's the bottom line. there's a defense. and for those of you who don't know, a standing ovation that to a member of the ss granted here division, the 14th division, they give a standing ovation today because that guy, back in the forty's, father associates and there's so oblivious to history,

they don't understand that soviets good or bad in the time they were the allied forces and they don't put $2.00 and $2.00 together. that someone who bought the allied forces was fighting on behalf of the axis. and they invites this guy, give them to standing ovations. but this is coming from the government. the trudel government means that it's called everybody under the sun. get it out just leaving the speaker resigned that operating in the blame is it's, it's to blame and he's the follow guy. it's the, it's the sorriest excuse on earth. or we didn't know who it was, we just stand up in good standing ovations to people who fought the soviet, announced as much during the parliamentary debates ro here or whatever. the explanation makes no sense. and even if it was only wrote to who invaded this guy, that they didn't understand in real time, the history of ukraine, of the soviets. it shows that they have the understanding of the actual history. they can have no understanding or grasp on the presence to dictate current global

policy. and i say thank you for having the on to discuss this because it's been basically a big media blackout in canada. the state funded media cbc global moves. you have to pull teeth in order to get them to cover the story and it's been the independent media that has been making hell of the story. so the international community understands what an absolute disgrace the current government is in canada. you see that's kind of unbelievable. i mean, the assignment ways and all center all was the story is this thing that your explanation that company drew how can that many people just be clapping on demand and not understanding that to more than 40000 canadians actually gave their lives along with americans. obviously, a greater number 27000000 russians to fight than i'd say that's, that's just not possible. i think it is. it's, it's, it's either it's not possible or it's inexcusable. but the other bottom line of this is, do i believe and should anyone believe for one second, the christian freeland, with her family ancestry,

had no understanding of who this guy was, or who we thought for, even if she didn't know him by. and this is the deputy prime minister of cavity is referring to. yeah. and yes, so yeah, absolutely be the, i think the 2nd most powerful member of the canadian parliament, christian freeland, has a family history going back to nazi as i'm and the ukraine to pretend, oh, they don't know who this individual is by name. that doesn't mean that they don't know of the history of the individual and the battalion that they fought for, who the says was, and you couple this with the fact that zalinski is in our parliament also giving a standing ovation to this gentleman. you think zalinski doesn't understand the history of the ukraine and his fight against the soviets and fighting with the nazis back in an old. what do you think he doesn't understand the history and they try to wiggle out of and say, well, it's not like everybody's supposed to know exactly who this guy is by name. first of all, course, truly you invited this individual into the government. there was a bidding process and i don't think for one second that they didn't know who this

guy was. but even if we go that far and given the benefit of the doubt, they didn't know one by name. they demonstrate an absolute absence of understanding of history, and these are the people making geo political decisions in real time with billions of our tax dollars that could very well lead the war and took the world into world war 3. basically it's making decisions. they have no idea what they're clapping up and they do it like a bunch of clubbing circuit seals because they think it makes them look virtuous to celebrate somebody go historically bought someone who was an ally at the time, but it's now perceived as being to me it's, it's easy. i mean, it was in textbooks presumably that all across the us as divisions when you were growing up in canada. i think it was, i mean it's, it's, it is a laughable assertion to say they didn't know laughable. and and then you say, even if i, you can't get past their christian freeland new zalinski, who was there asking for billions of more dollars. knew justin trudel if he didn't know he also known. and if he didn't know if this qualify,

they made an international mockery of the canadian government. but i said, the only i said we're just in truth was going to get in big political trouble. he's made an international scene of the, in fact, historical ties between the ukrainian or james and not sees him far right extremism speak, he's brought it to the international for now. that once upon a time 20142016. when the bbc was writing articles on ukraine's not the problem you chris for right problem 2022 comes around. all of that gets orwellian memory hold. they don't have a problem. it's russian propaganda and russians. rudo has now brought back to the international for this very real problem, highlighting the fact that the western governments are funding to the tubes of hundreds of billions of dollars or we're seeing that in fact has a known problem and they can't deny it anymore. but justin, triple get. so if you can believe this, the audacity it takes you comes out in his apology video and says, this is deeply embarrassing for all canadians, but we have to push back against the russian propaganda and rush in this

information verbatim. this guy found a way to try to blame the russians for his international embarrassment to get our parliamentary uh, house that is supposed to be, you know, a say uh, a wonderful place of respect and, and, and they need to sound a way to blame it on russian, this information in russian propaganda maybe the whole canadian problem. it is russian. this information. so i wasn't quite sure what he meant within 2 weeks or of course the standard response and it is a bi stature dri instrument. now not allowed for john this in britain to talk about those early bbc reports that you refer to, which as you say, it'd be in the res, down the memory hole. all students said zalinski is jewish. i mean, i suppose rather like obama is african american. i'm not sure what african americans in or africans in libby, i think of obama. he couldn't have killed black people in libya because he's african american. you know, the argument zelinski is jewish, so that's really terrible of you to draw any comparison or link between this as,

as wife and officer. and as lensky well, i mean, i can think of a number of other decent examples of people who are jewish, who might have done, participated in the very bad things that is being jewish is not a defense to the ac is ation. and it might actually also be the cheapest, most superficial shielding from the accusation. belinda, the method cuz i might say, well, i mean what you look at a man who is doing who might be partaking in bad things and say, well he's got to be good because he's jewish. yeah, but i mean, rehearse discrimination is still discrimination, but let's fall on the logic you create. can't have a knotty problem, because lensky is jewish, and you have somehow, per goshen. who is the head of the wagner group. they can still be nonsense, even though per goshen. is jewish, i mean, do people don't understand the corrosion, but the murder is mercenary. there from the wagner group who just got blown up in the plane was jewish. i don't think people know that. so if this defense of the

keys you is there for can't be anti semitic, you can support naziism worst results. so let's keep that nice cuts both ways. the whole problem is it means nothing. zalinski is judaism, or being jewish, or jewish ancestry means nothing in terms of his, of a political aspiration. is that what means? nothing in terms of the conflict now and it changes nothing in terms of a history which helps a little bit to explain that the presence as well in western europe, i suppose, as well as in canada, a mass censorship of, of the press. you said that on canadian broadcasting, they haven't really been talking about this in west and your a banding of russian novels, soprano, isabel arenas. how can canadians get a fair understanding of why billions of their tax dollars being sent into the landscape bank account? a house they have to watch alternative media viva for eyes of the world. the rebel news is that the true north of the post millennials, the canadian media for those who don't really appreciate this. if you're not from canada, you might not have a total appreciation. but too big, it is outlets,

i guess the biggest in quotes, cdc, canada broadcasting corporation in regards to canada are funded by the federal government's to the tune of $1200000000.00 annually. i think they're funded by the government directly, indirectly through advertising, other subsidies, whatever they are basically bought and paid for by the government. the argument being they're funded by the federal government. the federal government can change power, so it can go from, you know, liberal control to, to concern or controlled. some of the conservatives want to defend the cdc. so you can pretty much imagine who the cbc state fund is gonna be parcel too, but they're state funded. the other ones that are not state funded, the print media back in 2018, got a 600000000 dollar baler from just intruder. nothing, nothing. gains loyalty, more than handing out cash. so the print media got a $600000000.00 bill out in 2018. you can, you can assume they'll be a little bit of loyalty, not biting the hand that feeds some. come, coven digital media has been getting, i call it in direct bailouts,

in direct subsidies through covered as you know, told the narrative, you'll get government cobra that told the narrative. you'll get government subsidies in, in get out in various ways. illustrated perfectly by the fact that when google and meta said we're not going to part taken this link attached to the government of canada just imposed through one of their most recent laws. the government consists of oregon and we're going to stop advertising on your platform illustrating how the government compels acquiescence from the media. the only thing is, you know, mehta and google don't need government advertising, but digital print media does. so you see how the government buys loyalty directly and indirectly. and what we've seen is basically radio silence. there might be some stories here in there cuz it's like normal at this point, but it wasn't me, it's the media mainstream today. do you mean it broke the story? it was getting depends on media, the broke the story and the apple slide it so that it got international, strong willed international traction. and in fact, there's kind of the doesn't have a 1st amendment like the united states and it's kind of important. so it's all kind

of in the little telling me, i mean we've got a truck out there and we, we've got a charter of rights in very good a formalized and 1982. and it has the freedom of speech and theory, freedom of association, freedom of ability, except we've seen under cover that, that charter of rights is not worth the digital paper that it's printed on. because the government of canada has violated each and every one of our constitutional rights in his response to coven and other other subsequent matters in terms of regulating censoring content on the internet. will a case that we can really talk about. russel brands case as raise the profile of rumble of the platform. we go out on so many people uh, go out on uh who. com. go out on uh, youtube, uh, owned by pentagon contract or alphabet google. you understand or something to do with the rumbling away cuz it was a press release saying that the motivation policies were ramblewood, designed by leading rumbles, locals. create is robert bonds and david fry. hi. how do you design policies for

a platform that a different to the ones on the sense of platforms as well? so robert barnes and i were both attorneys by training robert and still a practicing attorney. and we devised basically the, the terms of service, the guidelines for how they're gonna, uh, you know, regulate content. and the most important thing is not having opaque rules that are politically weaponized to suppress ideological adversaries. what you know, the problem with, with youtube rules is not that they don't have any, is that they're so opaque or they can be weaponized one way or the other. someone says one word and it does or a sense to ship someone else's exact same word and it deserves amplification. so we've, we've, we've devised these, you know, terms which say, if it's a legal, it's not going to be censored, you know, above and beyond what is over harassment, what it is not, but it's not lawful in the 1st place. and more importantly than anything, transparency. so there might be issues where people say, you know, you've, you've,

you've took off a video for an x. why is that a reason? we, we think it's a violation of free speech. what was it? this is why, here's the timestamp. there's no ambiguity as to how the rules are being enforced on rumble, as opposed to youtube, where i have an interview with the a cam. rooney and clinic, what names possible and i got school was jail for violating corporate protocol into, into back find almost a $100000.00. they took off my interview with him because of medical misinformation and i don't know, i made a stick. it was like, we're just give me the time step, let me know where no response, sorry, that's all we can do, appeal rejected. so we've been working with rumble to make sure that their terms of service, community guidelines are clear and not susceptible of political weapon. isaiah sion, david, right, i'll stop you the more from the v before i host and for my litigate during candidate for the people's body accountants or after his break, the

the we are in control of land of fire breathing volcanoes. volcanoes vividly capture the imagination and they define our lives much more than you would expect. so what are they capable of and what makes contact as volcanoes stand up the welcome back to going on the ground. i'm still here with you before i those involvement litigate during candidate for the peoples body of kind of the david

fried. what did you make of the fact that rumble is that to take down its entire site from the republic a from that's because france says r t is state funded media. and if you don't block it, rumble, we're going to block, you take it down or will block. you. can you imagine this? this is a part of the 3 western society and set aside however you feel about r t o operate on the basis it states funded, and it could be qualified as propaganda. let's operate on the basis. it state funded propaganda. what do you think the bbc is? what do you think the emp yards were using the cdc in 20 think cnn is m s. nbc. i mean these things are directly or indirectly state funded propaganda. and because we're in a war that they then think they can go sensitive information so that you don't even have access to news from a certain part of the world, which if it's state funded propaganda above and beyond, maybe defending its own state funding, it might be critical of other regimes, other governments it's,

it's so patently obvious what this is. it's an attempt to control the narrative along the lines of or what it was. 1984, just yeah, delete certain stuff. blocks certain stuff and give the, the megaphone the monopoly of state for the propaganda to the states under propaganda that they like that they agree with it it's, it's preposterous. and the only question is going to be, is britain, you know, the birthplace of freedom, freedom of speech, individual rights is or is it going well, maybe it's not the best place, but is it going to follow suit and try to find a way to suppress, to deliberately target rumble, because rumble that has taken the position that it will not be monetized. one of his creators, based on anonymous, unproven allegations above platform conduct that have no relevance or connections to the online content. we'll see what we'll see, what a good that says i, i can't believe the world is getting to this point, however, but did it show even you david is being used to this guy? that sense of chip that's been growing and recently, is that

a you cable edition married to uh, someone from the u. k. shadowy, 77th, or gave this information division that i, i got to know when i was broadcasting for london would write to ramble, to ask them questions about a case which hasn't had any due process or due uh, judicial process. the tool, as i said with mrs. news broke of russell brands and they come up with monogamous accusers from decades old. and i've, i've known of russell brands history i've, i mean, i listen to his book, i say, listen, i, i mean, we can't, we can't really talk about, as you know, the british attorney general has said, don't even talk about it, just let himself or you can know, nobody can make money, he can't, you can't even defend himself publicly was i was, i was disappointed, but not shocked, but i said right from the get go. this is more than just russell brand. it's what russel brand represents, but it's also the 2 step to the platform that allows the voice is like russell

brand to be heard. and so i, you know, i don't like putting ju, do out in the universe because i don't want to feel responsible if and when that happens later on. so i kept my prediction a little bit to myself. although i did predicted, you know, they got the twitter, when i found out that they sent letters to take talk youtube to the b b. c. i mean this, this is one guy. i don't think they need it as the bbc. in fact, i think it was before youtube just acted or the magic though youtube is active, but they said that the british go whatever committee this was sent, the same type of the letter to, to take talk and then sent a letter to the b, b. c. encouraging the bbc to encourage employees to come forward with further accusations. you have a government entity, contacting another government and to be giving it the wink wink nudge, nudge to pay. if there were any more excuses out there and make sure that they know that they can go to the police as if anybody needs that reminder, it's the, it's to me, it's deliberately cooking up more accusations. so they can then not just go after russell brand, he's a big fish, but they're going to go after a whole sea,

after that rumble and twitter or the season, which the fishes like russell brand, swim and bright. and so this is nothing but uh uh, you know, the vague indirect way of getting to the platforms themselves in anticipation of 2024 anticipation of full regulation of the internet. so they can control what you can hear and what you can think. you can't talk if they, they want to, you know, protect the safety of the internet against back seeing this information and this information which we now seem to pretty much only from the government over the course of years. but yeah, that, that's, that's the game plan is disappointed today. i mean, shopping, trump can, i mean, the leading opposition leader of the united states can run using rumble from prison use, you know, dads, of course, did it before we've, we've seen, obviously dr. calls and being fired from fox news he's using rumble. i understand that all the eat on the sides. okay. can the how can we would stand the pressure at

the moment? i mean, any west in europe can impose all sorts of problems on these companies because there is no free speech. but the united states has that 1st amendment that they have it, they defended, and it's a clause i religious principle. and i say this in the best possible way in the united states. it's the freedom to go up and tell a government official to go ask themselves. and i understand the value of this now having come down from canada where i thought we had free speech. and i remember back in the early days of by channel americans were saying, you guys have no free speech up in canada and like, what are you talking about? we do a lot of the whole now you can actually be criminally truck, take you to for mrs. gendering someone and i'm that i'm almost not exaggerating there. but rather than that debate actually isn't the point them going back to what we're used to making by the idea that the nazi symbol was bought it on the truck is striking canada. oh, working on the glass, the canadians were associated with the pictures and while it turns out it's the

liberal elite. i appreciate this and everybody in the audience to appreciate this. there was one flag with us. this was swastika on it during the entire auto of protest. on day one, in a very convenient spot right in front of a professional photographer, they got their one picture and then demonized everyone there as far right extreme is anna folds up you name and that whether or not that individual was a plans and as on for buckets, or what about that person, was they with the flags commentating that they believe the government is acting like a nazi regime? that was it. and that was good enough to demonize. hundreds of thousands of people . you get the liberal government inviting, an actual massey into the, into the parliament and giving him to standing ovations and then saying, we didn't know, don't politicize if you have one mt green, a gold say without laughing. let's not politicize this. it's a shameless audacity that i cannot overemphasize,

let's not politicize this. and then she actually had the audacity to suggest put forward a motion to have the speakers opening comments struck from the digital archive and struck from the whatever the, basically the archives of where they, they, they keep the transcripts. they wanted to delete their own praise innovation of an actual massey while labeling everyone in canada who is a guest child genital mutilation against transgender ideology. as nazis far right extreme is they have no standards where, where all the defendants, i mean this is what i was getting earlier about the colleges record on world war 2, which is better argue, believe that the united states and went into the war earlier. where all the grand, great, great grandchildren of all is, a canadian veterans at fort denied says, i mean that's why haven't had to protesting against the problem. but by chance that there have been a lot of people protesting but also bear this in mind. a very sure of holocaust survivor from germany. demonized by the media. she comes out and complaint and you

know, compares it might not be the same distance but my goodness, it's the same direction. the world is taking now a holocaust survivor. she gets demonized as being far right. i mean, the thing is like a big it's, it's a, it's a political play for power. so there will be no standards. there will only be web an icing of things for power and then attempting to minimize things that damage that proceed for power. but where the people are, they've got to start getting very vocal peaceful lead vocals. she really this really, i mean that that's what it takes it, the violence doesn't work because we saw what happened on january 6th of minus donnelly doesn't work, is the pretext that they want we, we know the true to wanted violence during the auto a protest and but for the grace of god, there was done so they couldn't use that, but they still try. they want people to respond to their abuse in a manner that allows them to weaponized the response. the way to do it is public streaming. and you have to cumulate them on the national and international scene,

and i will be relentless and humiliating of the truth or theme for what they've done. this is just the latest, you know, but this is in the way, the tip of the iceberg. but it's the combination of it just intrude. oh, has violated his code of ethics and found to have done so in breach of the best of breach of his ethics. twice he was accused the 3rd time. this is the guy who dressed in blackface calls, all the people racist who groups reporters calls other people massaging is, violates his code of ethics calls other people corrupt and now calls other people, not these while standing ovations for an actual, not the public humiliation. relentless and the change will come from the bottom up and the top down in unison. but i'm doing my part is, i think there's a lot of people out there who don't have the, the political freedom to really say what they think. well, you have the ramo channel, but we don't know whether they are, you know, shot rumble, that, i mean, how easy will it be? how easy will it be for canadian authorities to explain how they last, uh,

this $1000000000.00 ukraine? why mean? they managed to explain, there was an operation move wheeler, that was cabinet is over asian in libya. we can see what the, what's happened to what was africa's reaches the cabinet of country operation impacts was their actions in syria. i don't suppose the main stream media or in canada talk about canadian actions in libya and syria, much today. how will they be able to explain the way the billions being sent to ukraine after this uh, this conflict ends in catastrophe? well, it's, it's already in catastrophe. and, and there are been hundreds of thousands of innocent ukrainians. i'd say ukrainian soldiers that have been sent to the slaughter of thousands of ukrainian civilians that have been casualties, images, it's a regional conflict and they, they've depicted it as good versus evil. and now justin trudel has really just shown to the world. maybe it's a little more complicated than that. how are they going to justify the vic history

will not look well upon this is my is my assessment because however you feel about this who's right and who's wrong. you have the west funding a proxy war with the blood of ukrainian soldiers and the blood of ukrainian citizens. and people say like, oh we can't, we can't negotiate with putting because he's literally hitler. why are you there? so it's the west fighting this proxy more for and on behalf of their natal aspirations and they're preferred to do it to the last ukrainian fighting aged male . and the last of creating a civilian a. the idea that putting is a hitler with global domination, but somehow can't even take over the ukraine, take over ukraine and doesn't have a population to even manage. we manage ukraine even if that were aspiration. i mean it's, it's a, the audit comparisons made by people who clearly have no understanding of history to the degree that they gave a standing ovation to a nazi soldiers because he fought the soviet score current enemies in quotes, not appreciating that they were the allies back and move or to david fry. hi. thank

you. thank you very much. and that's it for this year. i will be back on saturday with a brand new episode. but until then keep in touch viral social media. if it's not send, send in your country and had to a channel going on the garden tv on rumbled up. com to watch new and old episodes of going underground. see us have the the, by the middle of the 20th century, the portuguese colonial empire was in an acute crisis. a particularly tense situation had developed in mozambique the people of this country were put in a humiliating position, income inequality ramp,

and illiteracy. this respect by the portuguese for the local traditions led to a mass unrest. getting 1964, the liberal race in front of mozambie for a limo began its armed struggle for freedom. the regular army was not easy to resist, but the guerrillas inflicted considerable damage on the invaders through the fighters against the colonial regime were supported by the soviet union and china. whereas the united states and great britain took the side of the invaders, the board to gaze responded to the guerrillas attacks with cruel counter insurgency . however, 3 limos, 10 year courageous struggle was a success after the overthrow of the fascist regime and portico, late 1974, the new what the already surrendered. a year later, lisbon fully recognized the independence of mozambie. but the victory had been gained at a high price during the war,

mozambique had lost tens of thousands of and sons and daughters of the, the so lucky a crowns, a new leader who rally as a nation on the stands that the pro ukrainian agenda is jeopardizing the country and brought to swap, i must stop sending weapons to keep also ahead. the current in troops struggle to make gains in an offensive, according to the russian m. o, the london back tracks of a plan to send the partition instructors south to kia and the ties between russia, china and the african states are strengthening and to work on the moscow teaches chinese and the african language courses.