so what are they capable of and what makes contract as volcanoes stand out, the process of all the rain seems to be drawing off as well as it is. 12 officials admit that the us, canada, on the offer a long term solution to the ongoing conflict. and so that he is unionize in policy with the price the n t 8 to keep the base of rocky and cool defending himself against accusations of fraud, which he says i'm found that are meant to be real. is thomas is next is by the next for the next part as far as the this and the phone. so it goes back to after that is in model as a going to a least private statement from one to 5 commission to the u. k. funded studio for this country to see themselves as of the rest of the

country, the it's just the i'm here in the russian capital. welcome. where ever it will cost savings and use our phone today across the globe. this is all to no funds for a long term solution, not as the message from washington. the officials are made of the us no longer support the ongoing conflict in new claim. while we have the ability to continue to support ukraine's ability to defend itself, in the immediate term, we have already exhausted much of the existing security assistance funding. it is enough to for us to meet the meet ukraine's urgent battle from battlefield needs for a bit. for bit longer, but we'll remaining will, will be maintaining our, our study cadence of p. da's for sure. but it is not the long term solution. here it is not the long term solution. so on, washington is a, you, i,

lies of also be the, i'm to shift the financial priorities from helping key to solving problems at home . also, you contribute to the original mazda and takes us through the details. well, the use chief diplomat. use the burrell, you'll recall of you and the west are guard, and then the rest of the world is a general fame ventured out of the garden today to meet up with other european foreign ministers in t of because apparently that's the new capital of europe. now, but what's that timing for team unity because as they're needing to discuss how they can conjure up more euros to tacit princess vladimir zalinski, so we can keep doing is european values pulled out some worldwide on this tour. it turns out that the us congress has decided to suddenly get tight fisted dropping aid to ukraine to strike a bi partisan deal to keep washington afloat. that basically involves turning zelinski into the we in order to caprio character in the titanic movie during the

raft. seen sorry, paul, but there's only room for one on this raft and that's washington. but verola is now resorted to wishing aloud that washington re considers. i have told that this will not be definitive decision, and you can even continue having the support of the us you can use are fighting what's called the cottage, the capacities and you, we want them to be more successful. you have to provide with better arms, burrell and the you are pretty much now. the guy who books the super expensive holiday with his body only to have the body back over the last minute and leave him holding the bag. in the case of burrell, well, maybe he just hasn't noticed that washington has some major problems of its own right now that have nothing to do with you. crane like uncontrolled migration and the republican. how speaker i said that border funding has to come before you

friends the, the priority for me as america and our borders now i support being able to make sure ukraine has the weapons that they need, but i certainly support the border 1st. so we've got to find a way that we can do this together. the trends of citizens demanding that their leaders put the oxygen mask on their own country 1st before helping you frame, as also started to take hold on this side of the atlantic, the european side as well. while the western preston leaders framed last, we can slow back in election when by robert feats, those populace smear party as a below to ukraine. since you promise not to send them any more weapons, they really miss the point as though there was absolutely nothing else going on in the country other than ukraine. so that he has already given all the weapons that it had to possibly give to you free in any way, even feed. so himself wondered what all the fuss was about.

why, for god's sakes, don't we go negotiate piece? why do we only talked about how much munition we're going to send to ukraine? what tanks we're going to send? how many billions we're going to spend on more arms. secondly, the issue of anti russian sanctions. let's use common sense a little bit. well, maybe some sanctions did hurt russia, but the fact is that the russian economy is growing and the european economy goes into recession. as i say it loud and clear and will do so again to warn you. crane didn't start yesterday or last year. it began in 2014, when the ukranian nazis and fascist, started to murder the russian citizens in dumb boss and who gods. all right, so you see what he did there. he talked about me for a touch on that. me says, what's the big deal? we have an economic problem brought on by anti russian sections in our own country and in europe. and that's a big problem. and really, nobody's been talking about that the press was just talking about you friend and features. victory is one of the very 1st democratic manifestations in europe,

of people being absolutely fed up with the direction of the country. and the way things have been going in the west and how the establishment has just been completely obsessed over you frame to exclusion of the everyday person's problems. and that's exactly how some political leaders have interpreted features when here in france, robot fits. so he's victory was a welcome development. we need as many governments as possible, the deposed military support for key and the critical of the you and nate to so the was riding shotgun to washington being dragged along on this wild rawhide. it's cost europeans, an absolute fortune, just in their daily lives, with inflation skyrocketing as a result of the price of energy spiking. constantly. all this just to stick it to russian president vladimir putin. and now washington has injected from that wild drive and left europe all alone at the wheel. and bro seems awfully worried that the key as mobiles is headed straight for the ditch. for us

present, donald trump has slammed the civil food case. it gave us and as he paid the new york city court house, a continuation of the greatest which front of all time is out, he is this bribe. the trial, the republican fund run of a negative. that election added to the department of justice needs to take action in his favor. well, we have here is a me so very simply put, it's a, which is a disgrace. we have a corrupt attorney general of the states and see how she does this file was real fast dressed as fast as i have been brought years ago. but they waited till i was right in the middle of my campaign. the same with other trials, indictments, i built a great company. it's got tremendous value. it's got some of the greatest real estate assets in the world. and now i have to go before a row as

a continuation of russia, russia, russia, as a continuation of the greatest of all time. and i don't think the people of this country are going to stand for. now there's times yesterday is also a new york judge file, the don't funds on his family. businesses had full and the names linked to the value of his properties of assets. and pro is accused of providing false or misleading financial statements in order to obtain the message from the state lows, uninsured services pump was denied any wrong doing. meanwhile, the us supreme court has rebuffed updates to disqualify republican in front runner from next year's president to election over the legend role in the cap to run it back in january 2021. so the, off the top was a, like the said present in 2016. he was one bothered with a series of obligations including ties with russia. however, a series of probes in the us failed to find any evidence of the so called russia

gate link, which trump has always refuted. american investigative did claim that moscow had slides to interfere with the election, which must have denied, but were unable to link it to trump a u. s. republicans such as now suggested that washington stood up the war in ukraine to get bracket from the russians. a lot of the anti rush up session on the left has nothing to do with ukraine. it is their revenge fantasy over 2016. they blame russia for donald trump selection and they will bleed ukraine drive for payback. maybe uh for the state secretary, hillary clinton, the last the 2016 no action did from us fi to blame russia for the expense of nato and looking across the globe defending democracy and ukraine. ready expanding nato,

just as an aside to bad latimer. you brought it on yourself, and that was such a point of since i'm not going to buy a pile of the same. yes to michael. right. so the former and why you professor duncan public human level, right. smart and john in college senior editor, if i issue insight analysis platform gentlemen, i like to thank you all 3 of you for joining us today. and i'll see now mike. cool . i'd like to start with you 1st, though i'm from claims that the color of round of around for russian election in defense of engagement is being continued in every one of his indictments. what are your thoughts on that? yeah, i mean, i think that is, uh, you know, this, the militarization of, of the justice department and all of the da's going after trump is certainly

something to do with some sort of vengeance fantasy, some sort of revenge porn that the democrats have been uh, undertaking now since 2016, i'm not saying that the war in, uh, ukraine is a part of that necessarily. but it's very suspicious. and there's been this uh, you know, anathema in terms of booting and they've wanted, i think to execute another resume. change here through ukraine as a proxy, as a staging area for that. so i don't think he's wrong. i don't think that he's off base there. they've definitely continued this, which is part of li, partly in response to the so called collusion, election collusion with russia. yeah, it's interesting guys what

a lot to get face so bad with a dime. if you how threatened all the democrats of drums increasing influence we do so this type of race. well, i think they're very worried. i mean a bite and is a literally wounded candidate. he is not in good health. he is obviously not in good health. his approval numbers are very low. i think good bye and had to debate trump. it would be a fun thing is we would say. and they're worried, they're very worried that they cannot be trump, i think they're even worried. they can't be bobby kennedy. so they're going to try design law. sideline. trump, then kennedy as well. they're going to try to sideline their opponents because they don't think they could be the minute they are. right. which i think they're probably correct in that. a. yeah, interesting uh is definitely alonzo as they want to all the debates as well. they've been very interesting and, and quite funny as well. at the same time, john,

i, the very serious this. uh, we heard this us a republican side. so claiming that the democrats hold ross are responsible for trans victory in 2016 and waiting for it. this does sound a little bit fall face, but this is why they have retaliate and again, see plain. what do you think about that? they could fit the definition of farfetched that the timeline is simply that the russian federation in the united states were connected. you know, from 2016 onward in a variety of ways. and then again from february 24, 2022 with respect to ukraine. and then you add to that the legal issues that donald trump has and to say that or to make the connects connection that this is all payback, this is, you know, everything that's happened to donald trump is in some measure trying to connect

russia and that also remove him from the playing field, whether because of russian africa, i just think there's there a little too many ingredients in that su 4 to taste any good. and you're there. there are some legitimate issues that mr. trump has with the legal system. by virtue of his statements and actions, he tends to exacerbate the tends, makes them worse, and then you have a electorate that in the united states, that is, is fairly divided you of a 30 plus percent core of the republican party that very much support. mr. trump, and then you have the rest of the republican party trying to figure out what they can do. so yeah, i'm, i'm, i'm not with the, with the teams that are, that have,

describe everything russia from elections. i just think that there are no separate issues amongst them. all. yeah, so interesting indeed. um, you know, done. sorry, it's from michael. sorry. uh, what do you, what do you think about hillary clinton puts his eyes environment puts in for nato expires. and as a claim that quote, he brought it on himself. i mean, that's a ludicrous claim on her part. and surprisingly, there was no, certainly, there was a warnings that, you know, put, putting nato allies on the border of russia was not, was not advisable. that he saw it as a threat and that he's, he gave many, many warnings and also attempts to attempt to adjudicate the situation before it became so imminent. a threat that he saw that they would uh,

uh, then they would retaliate. but i'm not exonerating prudent or russ site for its actions, but i'm just talking about the conditions, the circumstances that condition this response. it's uh, uh, hillary clinton's a on her, her, her timeline is backwards. exactly. this is he didn't bring this on himself. he didn't do anything to uh, to uh, bring this upon himself. in fact, everything indicates that look, they've been, you know, the us back to a, to, and in ukraine in 2014, to replace and not a russian neutral president with a, a anti russian president. and the ukraine started bombing people in dom bass at the same time ukraine repeatedly violated the minx agreements. and the protocol uh, you know, and brand new allied partners were lined up on rushes borders. once the war started,

the us effectively mixed the talks between russia and ukraine, and the us and nato partners have in bold, is the landscape to keep the word going. despite the heavy casualties, the 6000000 ukranian refugees and the destruction of property and infrastructure. the us keeps escalating this conflict by sending money in arms and lending military intelligence to ukraine, reading these ukrainians and likely mercenaries into the mall desk. so achieving next to nothing, militarily or strategically. yes, definitely. really interested, are you how western media sort of switches things around and changes the timeline to just to sit it done. and i was a to, to more because this next question, because more of that, you're a human a of a, a labor rights lawyer. what will it take of what we've heard, both the us and its allies saying we will back to ukraine,

no matter what it takes. but what we'll need to happen in ukraine to forgive the expression to break the camel's back if you like. so really for ukraine size, you maybe say, look, you know, it doesn't matter how many weapons you sent us, we don't have the manpower anymore. well, that's a great question. it seems to me, ukraine may be nearing that a position now. i mean, i think you crane is in trouble. they have lost so many young men to this war. um, probably hundreds of thousands and uh, i think that right, you know, they're now having to forcibly recruit old people and off the streets to get them to fight. so they may be close to the point where they're going to have to see good deal. well, what we know, they saw the deal in the back degree, do a deal, at least in principle, back in march of last year. and the u. s. and u k. intervened to tell him, don't abide by that deal, right?

so i think you cried at some point may be ready. the question is whether the west will let them make a deal. and i don't think this current by to ministration is willing to do that. i think it will take a new administration to be willing to see reality and, and find a negotiated solution out of those. yeah, assessing indeed that's hope less lives. i lost really then more john, you'll deal to our international on the i see you will over the well the, i see that you travel the world. you're probably saying in the hotel right now. but you know, these both of the u. s. and e 's will claim to be committed to defending ukraine. but we, we can see like, uh this, the new leader and stuff like a robot fits. so a you need is sort of pulling away from providing especially leave full assistance . think he, if you think that's, let the ties of changing, john they've been,

you know, changing as we're nearing the 20 month of the war. it's been progressive and it hasn't been about a moment. it's been about a series of moments and you know, i'll, i'll go back to march and april when, and justifiably, so the government of ukraine president southern sky was incredibly belligerent, incredibly insulting, incredibly demanding that mostly nato member countries helping and deliver health and over time. well, it's been sort of an e k g in terms of peaks and valleys. he's continued that and we saw as the nato summit and bill. this was there where the presence of lensky and his team were warned for months, quietly,

stop pushing for nato membership because you're pushing too hard. you're insulting too much. most of these countries want this over for variety of domestic political reasons. and if you do push too hard, you're going to get an answer and it's going to be an answer you don't want. and sure enough, he entered the illness the day before making derogatory statements. then he gets there and it starts and he was told, you know, this isn't happening, particularly a country that's in an open conflict. and so you, you keep that going, you know, from bill this and then g 20, where he wasn't invited. and they were furious about that, but the prime minister mode of india held his ground and said there were issues other than ukraine that need to be discussed and that a no disrespect to ukraine. they're more important than ukraine. and now we come to

the us budget issues and when there are issues in the us congress about $300000000.00, which they've eventually pro and then $6150000000.00, which still sort of remains to be used. then the 24000000000 that the vitamins duration is asked for, which wasn't approved. but that just isn't the whole story. and that's where you're starting to get a lot of this flow back, not only in the us, but in the you, but that the buying administration is saying that that 24000000000 is roughly 90 days and that in january they want to come back and they wasted, basically want to go to congress and say, let's get this done in one shot for 24 calendar year. that will be $96000000000.00 in 2020 to the us congress appropriate

a 100. 13.1000000000. to add to that to 20. about 25000000000 and presidential drawdown authority. so the u. s. this is looking at $3400000000000.00, potentially by the end of next year. to put that in perspective, the 113000000000 last year represented about 20 percent of us federal government interest payments. just interest on the $36.00 trillion dollars in national debt. this year, us interest is going to be about $785000000.00. and now we're looking at another 100000000000 for ukraine. so you read that, you look at the european union where most of the money they've given to ukraine is in the form of grants, where our money is loan. recently, we gave them $230000000.00 to help ukranian companies. better integrate with european union car companies. and it's, it's, it's insane. so the 5 administration has done some damage on its own by not

focusing on what's truly needed us tax payers don't need to be paying to help ukrainians by corruption and to better integrate with the european union. that's the european union's job. and so their tax payer, john, so um, yeah, we had all of this together and um and, and that's one of the reasons why you have these fishers that have both the us and european union countries are just starting to say we need it off ran ukrainians may not like it, but we need an off ramp and no longer. so the discussion about will ukraine's or mine. it's a matter of what ukraine will look like. yeah, that is, it is devastating to think about far ahead. but before we get that, michael, let me ask you while i have you hit my gifts, i caught in the past. how you pronounce. his name is king size house speaker, kevin mccarthy, for allegedly making you deal with the democrats to guarantee money for you claim

1st lie. i have no idea. i wouldn't be, i wouldn't have been party to any such negotiations. so i can't say either. i mean, speculating, i would say there, there's always going to be deals made between democrats and republicans, if anything is going to move forward at all. so i mean, i'm sure something was discussed, but i have no empirical evidence on which to base a real opinion here except to say that i think something had to be sad about it. and certainly some kind of deal was probably struck. but i think that, you know, this is beside the point, i believe, because of the us and nato stop this funding. an army of ukraine i think, is the landscape would have no choice, but to negotiate a piece. and in fact, this could have been, this could have happened the long time ago. and this,

you know, he's been in bold and by all this money in arms coming in, i think, militarily, military intelligence as well. and this has been a, what was there and really and a dom, i'm savvy. i have one out of the time directors in my and, but i will find the 3 of you very much so much for joining me. that i might go back to the end life as a couple of human and labor wise. let junk of a senior editor of an issue is i've done. thank you so much for joining me here. all to thank you. thank you. the little one, the high commissioner surveys and has said that london was immigration plans were assign him and see because are absolutely wrong and e mail now his hospitalization was filled and then under cover investigation release plan, i'm to bridge that campaign group commission. i jo, some of the thing. yeah. also marks, british claims that it is a come passionate country. this is amazing. this, i guess,

really on a set of people for 400 years, they just do it. the china industry, the u. k. governments to then to send a some them see, cuz to the one that has of course being criticized by the countries and best suited to the u. k. a very must say that receipt. so i know for being so full sway my brave i'm in, which is the u. k is home sick retreat now and i'm the come by investigation that would just be the which was august rated by competing group known and quote led by donkeys shows the johnston for senior high permission. i offer one de pointing out to what most people know, but the government refuses to acknowledge. and that is that their plan is absolutely wrong then which is in his own. but i'm a journalist entity bonded to mid to the operation meeting for senior it a london club under the guise of a businessman from

a south east asian company. and she needs to um, proceed. yes, one seemed to invest in his country. that's what he tried to say to him so that they could meeting this london cup, but then doing that to meet him, he was almost a watch he would say to the prime minister, a whole secret about the case, immigration to police. and she responded by saying that she would tell them was absolutely wrong on that picture that to make the choice for people and it still has a model for this country to see them. so they are the rest of the country. this whole us of the country with dixon country. i'm just adding on to some of the things that the senior has acted in the,

the for the former justice minister also dismissed allegations off keeping up with the g the in the video. but then we've also had one, does the government slamming those investigations by the you pull the lid to buy a donkey saying that to keep gun operates from the position of mutual respect to an open dialogue with the case when it comes to matches, such as the migration and economy, beautiful talking to deals that the 2 countries have signed for one day is the right place to support those looking for century and opportunities for one day is committed to the principle that every person, whether the or of london or from elsewhere is to be to day quality for one day in the u. k. a parade from a position of mutual respect and open dialogue that i want on high commissioner to the u. k. police, an important tool in maintaining our strong bow, a trouble relationship with the united kingdom. the you kids, government plans just been some east for them. seek has to be one that was the and

rule and according to the court of appeals, not so long ago, besides you good child, which was the last last you would have seen a lot of them see because in the q k, the incentive to be one the on a, one way she could to claim a to the day and december, the high for the miss the see reset of seagulls had been just to the government plan, but several individual a some see cuz and having a some age took the case to the point of appeal which has moved is that the policies offer you k give, i'm good to help. if it's this does include the child is in the supreme court by the likes, the office way library from and which is the home secretary that you're talking about. you also still believe in folks that's a slip, c cause will fly to the one that's which is an unsafe country campbell, i'm talk about it and it's still in conflict. it's what it's name about, which is the t c. and so when i'm in pain, so starts to off. so the legal responsibilities of, for processing the resettlement office gets to the one the and that's just by court

documents that she.