r t, in a stumble while that so for this thing is, as always, is great to have your company here on, on the i'm, i'm on the, the west as a nancy problem and it's just not in canada. it's the west has a long history protecting. now please stand demonizing all things russian. the west is attempting to rewrite history. also a single mouth and the new york times tells us everything we need to know about the west losing proxy war the time out sooner than see and welcome back to going underground broadcasting over on

the world from the u. a since last year. and they to a nation authorities of sort to prevent john list from linking ukraine leaders. zalinski did not sees the media black outreach example of fios as when in the past few days, the entire parliament of canada. this has previously supported catastrophic, was on libya or in syria. give a standing ovation to zalinski and a nazi assess veteran joining me now from l. a. to find out what is going on with canada and it's billions to you. great is someone who recently room is a candidate for the people's party off canada. david friday night is a canadian form. it litigated to an award winning viva for i rambler. david, thanks so much for coming on. i mean, what has happened to your country? i used to live in vancouver. i knew the vancouver sun was pretty right wing back in those days, but really the entire parliament to the old politicians, the defective, celebrating the holocaust. it wasn't they, they have no idea what they're doing. that's. that's the bottom line,

the defense. and for those of you who don't know, a standing ovation that to a member of the ss granted here division, the 14th division, they give a standing ovation today because that guy, back in the forty's, father associates and there's so oblivious to history, they don't understand that so the, it's good or bad in the time they were the allied forces and they don't put $2.00 and $2.00 together. that someone who bought the allied forces was fighting on behalf of the axis. and they invite this guy, give them to standing ovations. but this is coming from the government. the trudel government means that it's cold. everybody under the sun, get it out just leaving the speaker resigned their dep or anything it the blame is it's it's to blame and he's the follow guy. it's the, it's the sorriest excuse. on earth or we didn't know who it was, we just stand up in good standing ovations to people who fought the soviet, announced as much during the parliamentary debates ro here and whatever the

explanation makes no sense. and even if it was only wrote to who invaded this guy, that they didn't understand in real time, the history of ukraine, of the soviets. it shows that they have the understanding of the actual history. they can have no understanding or grasp on the presence to dictate current global policy. and i say thank you for having the on to discuss this because it's been basically a big media blackout in canada. the state funded media, cvc, global moves. you have to pull teeth in order to get them to cover the story and it's been the independent media that has been making hell of the story. so the international community understands what an absolute disgrace the current government is in canada. you see that's kind of unbelievable. i mean, the assignment wheezing del santo, holocaust historians. this thing that your explanation that company drew, how can that many people just be clapping on demand and not understanding that to more than 40000 canadians actually gave their lives along with americans. obviously,

a great number 27000000 russians to fight the nazi and that's, that's just not possible. uh, same it is it's, it's, it's either it's not possible or it's inexcusable. but the other bottom line of this is, do i believe and should anyone believe for one second that chris just freeland, with her family ancestry, had no understanding of who this guy was, or who we thought for, even if she didn't know him by. and this is the deputy prime minister of cavity is referring to. yeah. and yes, so yeah, absolutely be the, i think the 2nd most powerful member of the canadian parliament, christian freeland, has a family history going back to nazi as i'm and the ukraine to pretend, oh, they don't know who this individual is by name. that doesn't mean that they don't know of the history of the individual and the battalion that they thought or who the says was. and you couple this with the fact that zalinski is in our parliament . also giving a standing ovation to this gentleman. you think zalinski doesn't understand the history of the ukraine and its fight against the soviets and fighting with denazi's

back in an old. what do you think he doesn't understand the history and they try to wiggle out of and say, well, it's not like everybody's supposed to know exactly who this guy is by name. first of all, course, truly you invited this individual into the government. there was a bidding process and i don't think for once, 2nd that they didn't know who this guy was. but even if we go that far and give them the benefit of the doubt, they didn't know one by name. they demonstrate an absolute absence of understanding of history, and these are the people making geo political decisions in real time with billions of our tax dollars that could very well lead the war into the world into world war 3. basically it's making decisions. they have no idea what they're clapping up and they do it like a bunch of clubbing circuit seals because they think it makes them look virtuous to celebrate somebody go historically bought someone who was an ally at the time, but it's now perceived as being to me it's, it's curious, i mean, it was in textbooks, presumably the article is the as, as divisions when you were growing up in canada, or, i think it was, i mean it's,

it's, it is a laughable assertion to say they didn't know laughable. and and then you say, even if i, you can't get past their christian freeland new zalinski, who was there asking for billions of more dollars. knew justin trudel if he didn't know he also known. and if he didn't know if this qualify, they made an international mockery of the canadian government. but i said, the only i said we're just in truth was going to get in big political trouble. he's made an international scene of the, in fact, historical ties between the ukranian her dream and not sees him for right extremism speak. he's brought it to the international for now. that once upon a time 20142016. when the bbc was writing articles on ukraine's not the problem, you chris fluoride problem. 2022 comes around. all of that gets orwellian memory hold. they don't have a problem. it's rushing propaganda and dressed. intruder has now brought back to the international for this very real problem, highlighting the fact that the western governments are funding to the tubes of

hundreds of billions of dollars or regime. but in fact has a known problem and they can't deny it anymore. but justin, triple get. so if you can believe this, the audacity it takes, he comes out in his apology video and says, this is deeply embarrassing for all canadians, but we have to push back against russian propaganda and rush in this information verbatim. this guy found a way to try to blame the russians for his international embarrassment to get our parliamentary uh, house that is supposed to be, you know, a say a, a wonderful place of respect and, and, and dignity. he's found a way to blame it on russian. this information in russian propaganda, maybe the whole canadian problem, it is russian just information. so i wasn't going to go anywhere within 2 weeks or of course, the standard response and it is a bi stature dri instrument. now not allowed for john this in britain to talk about those early bbc reports that you refer to, which as you say, and being a res, down the memory hole. all students said zalinski is jewish. i mean,

i suppose rather like obama is african american. i'm not sure what african americans in or africans in libby, i think of obama. he couldn't have killed black people in libya because he's african american. you know, the argument zelinski is jewish, so that's really terrible of you to draw any comparison or link between this as, as wife and officer. and as lensky well, i mean, i can think of a number of other decent examples of people who are jewish, who might have done, participated in the very bad things. the case being jewish is not a defense to the act is ation. and it might actually also be the cheapest, most superficial shielding from the accusation. belinda, the method, cuz i might say i didn't look at a man who is doing who might be partaking in bad things and say, well, he's got to be good because he's jewish. yeah, but i mean, rehearse discrimination is still discrimination, but let's fall on the logic. you can't, can't have a gnostic problem,

because lensky is jewish. and you have somehow, per goshen, who is the head of the wagner group. and they can still be nonsense, even though per goshen is jewish. i mean do people don't understand the corrosion, but the murder is mercenary. there from the wagner group, we just got blown up in the plane was jewish. i don't think people know that. so if this defense of the keys, you was never kept the anti semitic, you can support naziism worst. there's a load the, let's keep that knife cuts both ways. the whole problem is it means nothing. zalinski is judaism, or being jewish, or jewish ancestry means nothing in terms of his, of a political aspiration is now it means nothing in terms of the conflict now. and it changes nothing in terms of a history which helps a little bit to explain that the presence as well in western europe, i suppose, as well as in canada, a mass censorship of, of the press. you said that on canadian broadcasting, they haven't really been talking about this in west and your a banding of russian novels, soprano, isabel arenas. how can canadians get a fair understanding of why billions of their tax dollars being sent into the

landscape bank account? a house they have to watch alternative media viva for eyes of the world. the rebel news is the true north of the post millennials, the canadian media for those who don't really appreciate this. if you're not from canada, you might not have a total appreciation. the 2 biggest is outlets i guess the biggest in cloud, cdc, canada broadcasting corporation in regards to canada, are funded by the federal government's to the tune of $1200000000.00 annually. i think they're funded by the government directly, indirectly through advertising, other subsidies, whatever they are basically bought and paid for by the government. the argument being they're funded by the federal government. the federal government can change power, so it can go from, you know, liberal control to, to concern or controlled. some of the conservatives want to defend the cdc. so you can pretty much imagine who the cbc state fund is gonna be parcel too, but they're state funded. the other ones that are not state funded, the print media back in 2018, got a 600000000 dollar baler from just intruder. nothing, nothing. gains loyalty,

more than hanging out cash. so the print media got a $600000000.00 bill out in 2018. you can, you can assume they'll be a little bit of loyalty, not biting the hand that feeds some. come, coven digital media has been getting, i call it in direct bailouts, in direct subsidies through covered ads are, you know, told the narrative, you'll get government cobra that told the narrative. you'll get government subsidies in, in, you know, in various ways illustrated perfectly by the fact that when google and meta said we're not going to part taking this link to taxed. but the government of canada just imposed through the most recent laws of the government. hundreds of organ and we're going to stop advertising on your platform illustrating how the government compels acquiescence from the media. the only thing is, you know, mehta and google don't need government advertising, but digital print media does. so you see how the government buys loyalty directly and indirectly. and what we've seen is basically radio silence. there might be some

stories there in there cuz it's like normal at this point, but it wasn't me, it's the media main stream. canadian either broke the story, it was getting depends on media the broke the story and up amplified it so that it got international, strong willed international traction. and in fact, there's kind of the doesn't have a 1st amendment like the united states. so it's kind of important, so it's all kind of in the little, tell me, i mean we've got a truck out there and we, we've got a charter of rights in very good a formalized and 1982. and it has the freedom of speech in theory, freedom of association, freedom of ability, except we've seen under cover that, that charter of rights is not worth the digital paper that is printed on. because the government of canada has violated each and every one of our constitutional rights, and is response to coven and other other subsequent matters in terms of regulating censoring content on the internet. will a case that we can really talk about. russel brands case as raise the profile of rumble of the platform. we go out on so many people uh,

go out on uh who. com. go out on the youtube uh, owned by pentagon contract or alphabet google. you understand or something to do with the rumbling away cuz there's a press release saying that the motivation policies were ramblewood, designed by leading rumbles, locals. create is robert bonds and david fry. hi. how do you design policies for a platform that a different to the ones on the sense of platforms as well? so robert barnes and i were both attorneys buy training. robert is still a practicing attorney and we devised basically the, the terms of service, the guidelines for how they're gonna you know, regulate content. and the most important thing is not having opaque rules that are politically weaponized to suppress ideological adversaries. what the problem was with youtube was rules is not that they don't have any is that there's so opaque or they can be weaponized one way or the other. someone says one word and it does or a sense to ship someone else has the exact same word and it deserves amplification

. so we've, we've, we've devised these, you know, terms which say, if it's a legal, it's not going to be censored, you know, above and beyond what is over harassment, what it is not what is not lawful in the 1st place. and more importantly than anything, transparency. so there might be issues where people say, you know, you've, you've, you've took off a video for an x. why is that a reason? we, we think it's a violation of free speech. what was it? this is why, here's the timestamp. there's no ambiguity as to how the rules are being enforced on rumble, as opposed to youtube, where i have an interview with a cam. rooney and cubic want names possible and then i got school was jailed for violating corporate protocol into inter back find almost a $100000.00. they took off my interview with him because of medical misinformation and i don't know, i made a stick. it was like, we're just give me the times that let me know where no response, sorry, that's all we can do, appeal rejected. so we've been working with rumble to make sure that their terms of service, community guidelines are clear and not susceptible

a political weapon. isaiah sion, david, right, i'll stop you there more from the v before i host and for my litigator and candidate for the people's body accountant. there after his break. the moon zillow is, is this, this is the sort of the series pulling it for you. and you have them by see it the split it up too, but even the way needs yeah, you're saying this stuff and you have a c code that you those and but things go mental village. doesn't notice we are gambling with the future of all mankind and we're, we're risking it for not the

the welcome back to going on the ground. i'm still here with you before i those involvement, litigate or, and candidate for the people's body of kind of the david fried. what did you make of the fact that rumble is that to take down its entire site from the republic of france, because france says bar t is state funded media. and if you don't block it, rumble, we're going to block, you take it down or will block you with. can you imagine this? this is a part of the 3 western society and set aside however you feel about r t o operate on the basis it states funded, and it could be qualified as propaganda. let's operate on the basis. it's state funded propaganda. what do you think the bbc is? what do you think the n p r? what you think the cbc is? what is like cnn is m s nbc. i mean, these things are directly or indirectly state funded propaganda. and because we're in a war that they then think they can go sensitive information so that you don't even

have access to news from a certain part of the world, which if it's state funded propaganda above and beyond, maybe defending its own state funding, it might be critical of other regimes, other governments it's, it's so patently obvious what this is. it's an attempt to control the narrative along the lines of or what else? 1984, just yeah. delete certain stuff. blocks certain stuff and, and give be the megaphone. the monopoly of state for the propaganda to the state funded propaganda that they like that they agree with it. it's, it's preposterous. and the only question is going to be, is britain, you know, the birthplace of freedom, freedom of speech, individual. right. is it going well, maybe it's not the birthplace, but is it going to follow suit and try to find a way to suppress, to deliberately target rumbled, because, rumbled, that has taken a position that it will not be monetize. one of his creators, based on anonymous, unproven allegations a boss platform,

conduct that have no relevance or connection to the online content. we'll see what we'll see, what, what that says i, i can't believe the world is getting to this point, however, but did it show even you david is being used to this guy that censorship that's been growing and recently is that a new cable edition married to someone from the u. k, shadowy, 77th brigade, this information division that i, i got to know when i was broadcasting for london would write to rumble. to ask them questions about a case which hasn't had any due process or due uh, judicial process. a tool, as i said with mrs. news broke of russell brands and they come up with monogamous accusers from decades old. and i've known of russell brands history i've, i mean, i've listened to his book, i say, listen, i, i mean, we can't, we can't really talk about, as you know, the british attorney general has said, don't even talk about it, just let himself or you can know nobody can make money,

he can't, you can't even defend himself publicly was i was, i was disappointed, but not shocked, but i said right from the get go. this is more than just russell brand. it's what russel brand represents, but it's also the 2 step to the platform that allows the voice is like russell brand to be heard. and so i, you know, i, i don't like putting junior out in the universe because i don't want to feel responsible if and when that happens later on. so i kept my prediction a little bit to myself. although i did predicted, you know, they've got to twitter. when i found out that they sent letters to take talk youtube to the b b. c. i mean, they've this, this is one guy. i don't think they need it as the bbc. in fact, i think it was before youtube just acted or the magic though youtube is active, but they said that the british, whatever committee this was sent the same type of the letter to, to take talk. and then sent a letter to the b, b. c. encouraging the bbc to encourage employees to come forward with further accusations. you have a government entity,

contacting another government and to be giving it the wink wink nudge, nudge pate. is there any more excuses out there and make sure that they know that they can go to the police as if anybody needs that reminder, it's the, it's to me, it's deliberately cooking up more accusations, so they can then not just go after russel brand, he's a big fish, but they're going to go after a whole sea after that rumble and twitter or the seas in which the fishes like russell brand swim and bribes. and so this is nothing but uh uh, you know, the vague indirect way of getting to the platforms themselves in anticipation of 2024 anticipation of full regulation of the incident. so they can control what you can hear and what you can think you can talk. and they, they want to, you know, protect the safety of the internet against back seeing this information. and this information, which we now seem to pretty much only from the government over the course of years . but yeah, that, that's, that's the game plan is disappointed. do you think, i mean, you think trump can, i mean, the leading opposition leader of the united states can run using rumble from prison . use. you know, dads, of course, did it before we've, we've seen,

obviously dr. calls and being fired from fox news. he's using rumble, i understand that over eat on the sides. okay. can the, how can they would stand the pressure at the moment? i mean, any west in europe can impose all sorts of problems on these companies, because there is no free speech, but the united states has that 1st amendment. then they have it, they defend it, and it's a quasi religious principle. and i say this in the best possible way in the united states. it's the freedom to go up and tell a government official to go ask themselves. and i understand the value of this now having come down from canada where i thought we had free speech. and i remember back in the early days of by channel americans were saying, you guys have no free speech up in canada, and like, what are you talking about? we do a lot of the whole now you can actually be criminally truck, take you to, for missed gendering someone. and i'm that i'm almost not exaggerating there. but

rather than that, debate actually isn't the point them going back to what we're used to making by the idea that the nazi symbol was bought it on the truck is striking canada. oh, working on the glass, the canadians were associated with the pictures. and while it turns out it's the liberal elite, appreciate this and everybody in the audience sort of appreciate this. there was one flag with us. this was swastika on it during the entire auto of protest on day one, in a very convenient spot right in front of a professional photographer, they got their one picture and then demonized everyone there as far right extreme is anna folds up you name and that whether or not that individual was a plans and as offer buckets, or what about that person was there with the flags commentating that they believe the government is acting like a nazi regime. that was it. and that was good enough to demonize hundreds of thousands of people. you get the liberal government inviting an actual massey into the, into the parliament and giving him to standing ovations and then saying,

we didn't know, don't politicize if you have one m p green a gold say without laughing. let's not politicize. this is a shameless audacity that i cannot overemphasize. let's not politicize this. and then she actually had the audacity to suggest put forward a motion to have the speakers opening comments struck from the digital archive and struck from the whatever the, basically the archives of where they, they, they keep the transcripts. they wanted to delete their own praise and elevation of an actual matching while labeling everyone in canada who is a guest child genital mutilation against transgender ideology. as nazis far right extreme is they have no standards where, where all the defendants, i mean there's what i was getting the earlier, but the, they kind of just record on world war 2, which is better argue, believe that the united states and went into the war earlier where all the grand, great, great grandchildren of all is

a canadian veterans at fort denazi's. i mean that's why haven't had to protesting against the problem. but by chance um that there have been a lot of people protesting but also bear this in mind. a very sure of holocaust survivor from germany. demonized by the media. she comes out and complaint and you know, compares it might not be the same distance, but my goodness, it's the same direction the world is taking now a holocaust survivor. she gets demonizes being far right. i mean, the thing is a big it's, it's a, it's a political play for power. so there will be no standards. there will only be web an icing of things for power and then attempting to minimize things that damage that proceed for power. but where the people are, they've got to start getting very vocal peacefully. vocal humiliate this really. i mean that that's what it takes. if it violence doesn't work because we saw what happened on january 6th of minus donnelly doesn't work, is the pretext that they want we, we know the true to wanted violence during the all to

a protest and but for the grace of god there was done. so they couldn't use that, they still try, they want people to respond to their abuse in a manner that allows them to weaponized the response. the way to do it is public shaming. and you have to cumulate them on the national and international scene. and i will be relentless and humiliating of the true doors in for what they've done. this is just the latest, you know, but this is in a way, the tip of the iceberg. but it's the combination of it just intrude. oh, has violated his code of ethics and found to have done so in breach of the best of breach of his ethics. twice, he was accused the 3rd time. this is the guy who dressed in blackface calls, other people racist growth reporters calls other people. massage it is violates his code of ethics calls other people corrupt and now cause other people not fuse while standing ovations for an actual nazi public humiliation. relentless and the change will come from the bottom up and the top down in unison. but i'm doing my part is,

i think there's a lot of people out there who don't have the, the political freedom to really say what they think. well, you have the ramo channel, but we don't know whether they are, you know, shot rumble, that, i mean, how easy will it be? how easy will it be for canadian authorities to explain how they last, uh, this $1000000000.00 ukraine? why mean they managed to explain, there was an operation. moby la, that was counted as operation in libya. we can see what the, what's happened to what was africa's, which is the cabinet of country operation impacts was their actions in syria. i don't suppose the main stream media or in canada talk about canadian actions in libya and syria, much today. how will they be able to explain away the billions being sent to ukraine after this uh, this conflict ends in catastrophe? well, it's, it's already in catastrophe. and, and there are been hundreds of thousands of innocent ukrainians. i'd say ukrainian soldiers that have been sent to the slaughter of thousands of ukrainians civilians

that have been casualties, images, it's a regional conflict and they, they've depicted it as good versus evil. and now justin trudel has really just shown to the world. maybe it's a little more complicated than that. how are they going to justify the vic history will not look well upon this is my is my assessments because of however you feel about this who's right and who's wrong. you have the west funding a proxy work with the blood of ukrainian soldiers and the blood of ukrainian citizens. and people say like, oh we can't, we can't negotiate with putting because he's literally hitler iron the there. so it's the west fighting this proxy more for and on behalf of their natal aspirations and they're preferred to do it to the last ukranian fighting aged male. and the last are creating a civilian a. the idea that putting is a hitler with global domination, but somehow can't even take over the ukraine, take over ukraine and doesn't have a population to even manage. we manage ukraine even if that were aspiration. i mean

it's, it's 80 audit comparisons made by people who clearly have no understanding of history to the degree that they gave a standing ovation to a nazi folder because he fought the soviet score. current enemies in quotes, not appreciating that they were the allies back and move or to david fry. hi, thank you. thank you very much and that's it for this year. i will be back on saturday with a brand new episode, but until then, keep in touch viral social media. if it's not send, send in your country and had to a channel going on the garden tv on rumble. don't come to watch. new and old episodes of going underground c as have the the same is possible anymore to understand western security as policy

with rational, logical c rees concepts, a piece is now move into the re on all the irrational emotional is talk to is the,

the but the dish to the dots that all the job i those videos that i see it pretty when i see it was that on the isn't boy stuff with me. if i need to, can it be a boy sit out and even interest them, and they'll say that and the id, i'm sharing a full moon are settled, and this announce wirelessly to plus the i new up. she's clear sheet isn't that i would need to get up listed on the progressive implementation because i left so you could either call noise and get by the end of the debate. me by now is this, which is because lectured on premier and by doing the conflict of cd quantum that you'll sound at these charging system windows for 2 pieces. patrice me and you pick a tool, sit proceeding, doc, see to be able to show that there's not rosalie's boy. he puts you in with a fit on us that can you just a new listing with the funny assad government gas to death over a 1000 people in spring 2011.