will strength and we won't allow the palestinians to continue to spread lies and distort history. while is waiting militia, undoubtedly strong on some into leaving others were encouraged to flee by neighboring arab states. this came as those states pushed in to repel the newly born jewish state. at the store to pick our up is really was in 1948 that was so is well take significantly more lines in the u. n. had envisaged, while the remaining palestinian communities found themselves under the rule of egypt in what became known as garza. i'm jordan in the west bank in east jerusalem . the right to return is a cause close to the hearts of millions of palestinians around the world. but it wasn't until the late 19 eighties at that possibility grew into a real decoration and palestinian meters and eggs all staked by claim. the session culminated in the declaration of the palestinian state on our belly stained inland, representing the natural combination of the valiant and tenacious popular struggle

which has continued for more than 70 years and taking it stole in the amount of sacrifice as me. but our people in its homeland, on his throne tiers and an old accounts and places to which it has been dispersed. plans for 2 state solution started to buy fruit in the ninety's with the old slow accord. it was a deal signed by the leaders of both sides, but that quickly came and stuck on the decades of the cycle of violence. continue to spiral despite widespread international recognition of palestine. the palestinians remain a fragmented nation with new unified state of the writing of peace talks all long overdue. many countries in the region sympathized with applied in this tragic disaster, which is aptly named neck of the day. the apartheid zionist regime was established in millions of palestinians as the original inhabitants and owners of palestine were forced off their ancestral lands. on the occasion of the 75th sunday,

the serial the neg bought, i once again re to re tell a strong support for the posting on costs personally and on behalf of my nation. i would like to express that we as the tickets nation stand by the posting on people against the occupation and injustice that has been going on for 75 years on the day of the 75th anniversary of the neck. but we painfully recall the tragedy of the brother, the palestinian people, and the crime against humanity that was committed against them in 1948 when hundreds of thousands of people in palestine were forcibly driven out and displaced to remain with the successive generations away from the homeland over a period of more than 7 decades in 2023, but not on a victory was commemorated by the un for the 1st time, a decision celebrated by palestinians. i'm criticized by as well, if nothing else, it was perhaps a way of view and acknowledging its will in 75 years on silence us or us

and is rarely conspiracy to kill people in the gaza strip. that is the striking obligation from his stuff about duty, general secretary and co founder of the palestinian national initiative. and the latest episode of going on the ground. he says, palestinians are being evicted from their homes and watch the whole episode throughout the day. in the meantime, here's a quick preview. why do you, would it help if egypt opened the crossing? i know it was bombed soon off to you and then yeah, we said leave guys as if there was a way to leave guys. what, what do you see is the role of interest that i see here is the conspiracy between the on, unfortunately, this american administration, which is behaving in my opinion and it the responsibility on a because nothing, you know, said the police are the homes that military spoke special also not then, you know, came out and said, i'm assuming you guys, i should evict their arms and go to egypt. this became the headline of the senate

few days ago and then stood. it can be the support sped. it's one of the american defense ministry. spent that there shouldn't be a human stadium, couldn't do it with egypt, but only in one direction to egypt. so what do we see here? it's a tool conspiracy to keep bombarding. people in gaza. keep bombarding them. i'm kilograms day on event, and they've actually goes through, i still believe the insidious thing festival. and i still believe in the humanity. i still believe that out of good people in every country. and i am been doing my old on the fact that the see all these a lot of images, especially students can of children and by this time, slow to buy as early as strikes. there are 5000 probably 500 prisoners now. and is there any is including dollars done to 100 children? and many of these children like are the other $1260.00 by the studios are under

administrative detention, which means they don't know why they are in june. which means they are practically kidnapped up next on direct impact. rick sanchez and his desk ticket, the dive and tomatoes, fiscal irresponsibility when it comes to the ukraine conflict, the honorary sanchez. i've been doing news now for some 30 years to languages all over the world. and here in the united states, i've been interviewed. i've interviewed some for us presidents and worked at about 4 or 5 different us television networks been fired by most by the way. i really knew it should be honest and direct and impactful, and this,

this is direct impact. the so i've noticed that lately, even though it's cnn, is admitting that the situation for ukraine and it's counter offensive is quote, increasingly sobering. when you creating troops manage early on, travel back a good deal of that invasion force hope so initially high, they can quickly finish the job. it's not worked out that way. and now new reporting tonight that there's going concern among western allies about ukraine's counter offensive. and it's fate in a moment. we'll talk to a retired 3 star general for his take, but 1st disclose reporting from she nash. i'm sure to look, it's right there on the screen. you see the words increasingly sobering. now, if cnn is saying that the counter offensive is increasingly sobering, certainly be increasingly sobering, or maybe even worse. why?

well, because c m m, and you probably have noticed, is and has been among the ukrainian governments biggest cheerleaders. i mean, if they say it ain't going well, pardon the 8, then it must truly not be going well to. and then there's this. they recently did a folder at the cnn, my old colleague's, which as it for the very 1st time ever, a majority of americans are now against continuing this and billions and billions of dollars. do you crime? in fact, as americans watch the death toll grow from like the fires in hawaii recently, many are asking why is it taking the vitamin ministration so long to send so little to those americans while we send so much by way of relief to ukrainians? since when does the need to send money to ukrainians rank above the signed release

funds to americans and lock? that's the reality. no matter what position you are on. that's what americans are asking themselves these days and ask yourself why this is happening. how about the money we do send the ukraine because it's, i think this is important part of this, which by the way is a lot how is it accounted for? let's start with just some basic numbers. congress approves i'm $113000000000.00 and aid to your grand last year. and i know it's a hard number to kind of nail down because you'll get different figures somehow unless you're even saying the real figures closer to a 137000000000. i saw a lot of money because of the enormity of those numbers, a watchdog organization that track the money that we spend enough data stand has now come forward and they are recommending to congress that we audit those funds. so what happened in afghanistan doesn't happen again. by the way, what happened enough to understand, you probably know this. maybe you don't. $19000000000.00.

$19000000000.00 was lost to waste fraud abuse. who knows? just disappeared into thin air type $2000000000.00. that's your money. now, based on that, you would think congress would want to make sure that the money that we send is audited. right? nope. democrats right now, and congress are actually saying, it's okay, we don't need to audit the money to ukraine. if it is a $137000000.00, you're saying a $137000000.00 does not mean to be audited. now if you're asking, are they actually turning down the oversight of the funds? are they really doing that? after what we saw happened in afghanistan and in iraq and in other countries. yep. yep, exactly. that's exactly what they seem to be doing. it seems crazy. no as a taxpayer anyway. so here's where we are. we have americans for the 1st time,

souring on their tax dollars going to ukraine. we have the us corporate media for the 1st time starting to recognize that so lensky is government may not actually be telling us the truth when they say they're crashing. the russian military and it sounds like it might be the right time for congress, maybe the by the administration. maybe some of these neo cons to at the very least, just take a step back. right. take a step back and reassess the theater, reassess the situation. the wrong again. in fact neil cons like john bolton, president, trump national security advisor, who now is among his biggest critics, is wanting americans not to electronic get because he will when they don't have his words. proving once again that nato is to me. a cons. what squirrels out of dogs, they're obsessed by a mitt romney. here's another example. despite long standing treaties that would prevent this from happening. the senator from utah recently said that he wants to.

he wants a more aggressive new us strategy in the black sea. the former presidential candidate, assuming to suggest that we should send us naval ships into the black sea right now to try and regulate traffic and patrol the region. a lot of observers who heard that are saying that wouldn't be akin to russia sending warships up the st. lawrence river through new york all the way up to lake michigan to regulate shipping lanes in lake michigan. how would that go over? exactly, so, so maybe maybe the take away is this. well, most americans and even the us corporate media are beginning to recognize that we should work toward a cogent, maybe more peaceful resolution the, and the conflict. democrats and republicans as usual, both more fully uninformed and downright war hungry. it seems. is it

because of all the money that they get from war, profiteers, weapons manufacturers. the lobby is who shall it out? i don't know. the, let's talk about this. i don't even know right here in the studio we have uh michael milofa former uh kind of got official as well as garlic nixon who is uh, co host of google. our. i'm not radios that day. all right, thanks guys. so glad you're here. i don't. i guess we've got to start with we have spent mr. me lose a $137000000.00. bill. how does there's a $1000000000.00? it's in ukraine, and people are actually saying, we don't need the audit if we trust our government. how crazy does that sound good? it's of noxious and, and it's, it's foolhardy. and there are, there are calls actually in the congress, the house, the house has passed legislation to the, in the a, the national defense authorization bill to do just that, to set up an office with in the office within the uh,

it inspector general to do basically what the, the inspector general for afghanistan did for, for asking even out of here in favor that we need to give him tons of money to ukraine to do whatever the hell is that they want to do with it. you still should be good, right? well, especially if you compare it to afghanistan to what happened in afghanistan, we see in the extremely high numbers of, of fraudulent a operate here till the economic operations to where we solve the, the weapons that were left behind. and basically it was in the atm machine for the military industrial complex for, for years. okay. but yes, actually domino, stop me. you're talking about a gun and stand it in this case. we're talking about ukraine, who has a democratic form of government, a very honorable and respected leadership, including mister so lensky. and there's no way in the world that there would be any corruption there. right. well, the reason i compared it is because it was a money laundering operation, and this is

a money laundering. operation is the same thing. you know, sy hersh reported that the c i a chief went to the zalinski and basically said, you know, you stole $400.00 all or $400000000.00. you got to do to more than your fair share . sarah, share it with some of the other people, they understand what's going here on here. they can't do an audit because they already know the level of criminality that's going on here. you think that's really what you think they know if we were to do an audit, they're going to find out that these guys are taking the bodies. the lensky recently fired. i don't know, but i'm good bachelor of people in his government. and he said, the reason i'm firing them is because they're all corrupt. so they complained because he wasn't sharing that money, that he was doing everything. the people he fired were actually a part of the deal. they yeah, they were all part of the deal and he kept much of it for himself. the problem here is that we have a demo. we have a democrat side in the house and the senate that feel that it would send the the wrong signal to the allies if we did. if we started the audit number one. and

number 2, it would send a message to moscow that we were not serious but, and, and, and, and, and, but, but the here, here's the problem. when the n d a comes up in the, in the, in the senate and the house for a conference committee, that's where you're going to see the brouhaha. it's attached to the defense authorization bill. we're talking to michael, believe he's a former beneficial and also brought a next in the host of the critical hour on sputnik radio. i guess the question i need to add you gentleman at the deal with his. why are we getting such a weird story from the corporate media that says, some of the following things? the russian military is incompetent. by the way, these are people who destroyed hitler's, not the military. the crane is a democracy. button is hitler who's trying to take over the world and the ukrainians by far are winning this whole thing. which of those things is true or

not true? none of them is true and, and it's a binding administration, but is controlling the multi they the mass media in this country and saying what they, what for him to start the meal, carmichael, i disagree with you over to the neo cons or controlling the message. i really don't think it has that. what you're doing. all right, victoria, no matter where you put in there, they're going to get the same as victoria new and she's, she's the deputy acting deputy secretary of state. now she has family that came from you crate. why is she a t, right? how are those people different from the people in the bush administration who got us into a couple of wars? well, are they? well, they had, they had, they had other designs. now then the need, then the icons will, will look for any more. so it's, it's, it's a push democracy. that's my point that i'm making to you. and i'll bring you this, the into this carlon thing by them out of the way, take the democrats out of the way part of a different president. does anything really change? absolutely not. and i agree with you because what we're talking about as an ideology and we're not talking about you joe biden. in fact, there are many,

may be one who believe the joe biden isn't making decisions. now, the joe biden is not competent to make decisions now. so he is a president, he is theoretically presiding over this, all we are the allergy. and as you said, if they, if joe biden is going to more they could put a picture of joe by, they could put a cardboard, cut out of joe by using the same, by the way, let me argue with you on what they have. now. i don't care if he's incompetent or not competent, or if he can speak, or if his brain still works. even book fair, all of that. he's always been a pain war guy. the war guy, right? yes. i wouldn't think that even if it was well, but he would be doing anything different. exactly. all you have to do is look at the people around him. they are neo cons and what we know about the neo cons, they've been consistent. victoria newland was dick cheney's assist it through your policy was she was hillary clinton's assistant under brock obama. she missed a little bit of time under trump and she's back. so this is a ideological strain that has come to power and they are doing what the they do. so

look, here's what i want to do. i want to talk a little bit more about what can possibly happen moving forward, and maybe a better understanding of what's actually happening in the theatre from you. michael, as a military guy, they help us understand that. all right, you guys stay right there by the way. i wanna continue this conversation with you as well. all you gotta do is reach to me on twitter. the handle is rick sanchez, tv. that's rick sanchez, tv, and we can have a conversation like the one we're having here and i'll look for you there. by the way, when we come back, we'll have money for ukraine ever dry up, or are we being led into a hot wheels with your more when we come back? don't go with the the

the pay. welcome back. i'm like sanchez. what we're talking about is congress. our congress just doesn't seem to be able to whip up enough support here in the united states boards, members, to audit the us taxpayer dollars. oh, just a few of them calling over to ukraine and were joined once again by our panel. michael maloof. plumber robeteck unofficial. as well as got a mention. who is the cost of the critical hour on radio? sputnik. my thanks again. the both of you gentlemen for being here, did you guys get a chance to watch the g o p debate? yes, i have never seen more people trying to out do each other to try and same 12,

like they're going to take on the world. and we've got to and china, and we're going to take off with, you know, and, and, and rush, it just seems like they're living in the 1950s or something. is it me or are they crazy? what i saw was a bunch of candid talking points. when i watch that, and i watched trump or i watched, and joe rogan, you'd see why everyone is leaving corporate media. you see an honest conversation when you agree with it or not. it runs like tucker carlson, and donald trump were thinking about what they were saying and answering these people. these were tried and tested, talking points from their particular parties. i can make the government smaller than you. oh, i can drill more than you. people have had enough of that. they can't pay their rent, their house has been burned down. so what do you, what do you think? and i want to make this point. what do you think, michael, the, the american people trust the, the least these days? the members of the corporate media or the member of the house and senate. well, it sounds like both. there, this is what we're seeing. pete,

they are the american people know better now they, they've seen it with their own eyes. we've lived through 20, some odd years of war and we get, we're going to be going to war again and, and nothing seems to change and, and just doing this administration alone, things have gotten worse. you think it's the way here's as an american, what i want to know if tomorrow, president biden called president, put, and called presidents a lensky, and may be involved president she and may be in pro and involve mowdy or a couple of other world leaders. and this, it, guys, we gotta figure this out. let's try and figure out how we can come to some kind of drew's or some kind of arrangement here with this ukraine situation. has anybody even tried to do that? do we care to do this? it's not in our interest. right? again, it's not in the us, so peace is not in our interest. that's correct. and why the hell the thing to say, you know, why did we expand nato? the way we did when, when the warsaw pact went away? after, after the fall of the soviet union,

so you're saying that report that said that the former prime minister of the great britain went over there and literally told zelinski do not agree to anything. we don't want this thing to stop that's probably drove at it. he'd probably did, yes, i would say he did anything of that. oh, that's not for good or forget it was the ukrainians that reported that so you know, right, there are not a lot of things. i believe that of your training and media media, but that one seems to make a lot of sense. and it's simply because the us plan this, i mean you, all you have to do is look at the grand chest boards. it was a big new brzezinski is a book for years. the us as telegraph, that all they want it was the getting ukraine into shopping ukraine up at night like a knife and the cutting brushes root with it. and they've gotten what they want. but be careful what you paid for, you might just get it. rick. it was victoria newland, and, and then vice president biden, who arrange for the crew in 2014 and that of ukraine at why? because they wanted to begin an isolation of russia. this is all aimed at at

containing russia and, and to, and, and, and now china. and now you hear the head of nato stoughton bird who's saying we need now the expect in nato, into the, into the, in the pacific. and people are objecting. why are we doing this? why do we have this kind of expansion military expensive, but the reality of the situation on the ground? not if you listen to see and then then you know, nbc and fox and all the corporate media or, or the newspapers here in this country. but if you really are a keen observer and you start doing your homework on this, is that in fact the ukrainian military is being decimated. yes, this is what i'm reading in certain places. is it true? yes it is. and that they're running out of soldiers either running out there, running out of soldiers. in fact, i saw a clip this morning whether where authorities in ukraine are actually virtually

kidnapping young men due to be the so in other words, the trying to take people off the streets and get them. yeah. i because they to yeah, i've seen some of those videos as well as happening and we've confirmed a few of them. okay, so let's, let's make this argument right. garland play along with me here. ukraine. is it a tough spot? it really is running out of reinforcements while it's trying to tell the world that it's having success in this counter offensive. what happens when you're out of your soldiers? who's gonna fight collapse? that's the way this thing is, is going to eventually collapse. eventually there will be some kind of a clue against zalinski. there will be some kind of a collapse militarily and politically because. busy as there is no space for this public government, they're just puppets of the neo cons to come back to reality and to discuss with the rest of the issues. not to mention, they've had a number of agreements with russia. the men's go chords. what means 12, et cetera. rest is not going to believe them again. so they're just going to fight

and they're going to eventually, okay, you say collapse. let me give you another alternative. they run out of boots on the ground. somebody else furnishes those boots on the ground. some would even argue maybe the united states of america. my country is going to front as those boots on the ground. maybe poland maybe made. oh, is it possible it worries me a little? i'll say this. we wouldn't if we could, but we can't. so we, well, we actually don't have the troops. we actually, we're being demilitarised along with you. great. what does that mean? that means that we don't have the numbers of troops in um, in, in, in the area. it would take the united states a couple of years to get the number of troops in that theater to effectively engage russia on the ground on the ground. and we don't have the ability to do things. my opinion is, do you think there's a political sense or movement or even need to do that other people in this country, your friends at the pentagon or near ponds? maybe a little crazy or the new? pardon me for saying that by the way. but who would actually say no, no,

we need to get our guys in there to fight those rush. no, i don't think that's, that's not the flavor of the thing. even the crazy is won't say no, no, no good. not, not, not the, not the current pentagon. back back then maybe. yeah. when we were really strong, but our, our, our stockpiles are, are depleted and, and we, and we don't have control over a lot of the resources that would take the build up. we would have to tweak the memory and my, i mean, i mean that's crazy. so crazy talk here would be it would, we won't work through it. yeah. so like i envision a country like poland. poland has been various sort of, you know, over there. they're the ones who are buying new military equipment, whether it's from us, from japan. and they are using nato ultimately to re gain portions of what's ukraine that they historically occupied at one time as well as bell roofs. so i've seen where basically you're going to be confronted with getting into one of their 18th century wars and everything and the 21st century. and i think,

but let's go back to the model. this is what worries me. the theater right now is russia against ukraine. right, yeah, my concern is the theater expands into the russians, the ukrainians and somebody else and who potentially could be that somebody else. and how worry some, would that be, i would say the 1st or, or next in line. and the cannon fodder line is, is pulling the problem is poland, but they can feel maybe a 150000 troops. they even there, i mean, rush of sitting with several 100000 troops in this. ok, so on the side, russia does not. i mean, excuse me, poland does not have the military might to engage the russian army. the russian army is, is, is pretty powerful. they are not using everything they have. but if a gentleman and if that happens, and polish soldiers go in, poland is a part of the data correct? isn't there an agreement that says if the russians then attack polish the soldiers, then the whole of nato has to go in or is that correct? does that apply?

if they go into ukraine and they fight and you create article 5 wouldn't that's not apply. that's correct. okay. yeah, but there's a, there's a distinction there. and you're absolutely correct the, the, the if, if, if they do a bilateral thing without approval of nato. it's article 5. they are political and we'll leave this because we don't want to turn this into a segment about public. but do you believe there's a political will in poland from both the people and the amount of patients to do something like this? maybe the politicians, but not the people even your you look up, listen to your listen to jeremy, listen to france or sick of it. in fact, their economies are wrecked. they're not, they're gonna, it's gonna take a decade or 2 for them to re gain their quality of living that they had prior to all this. and it's, and wait until this winter, this winter is going to be bad. why are they ukrainians? if it's true, as we've seen in more credible reports around the world, but the ukrainians are not necessarily tearing it up over there or at least their military. is it? why is that? why haven't they fared well with all the inclement?

the $137000000000.00 worth of equipment. well, but i mean, let's, let's face it. you know, if you've read any history about the russian army, you look at what happened with france, attack them and hit were attacked them. beats. the history says that if you attack russia, they end up in your capital. so to put the ukrainian, which is the strongest proxy army that the u. s. has ever had, but it's still a proxy army. it doesn't have an effective air force, and it's not a legitimate military match for the russian army. they never had, it sounds like you're saying we expected too much of them. well, no, there's what we expected was for them to engage russia. we could then use economic coersion to take russia out, mark that didn't happen. we didn't have another answer, michael, i'll give you the last word on this. i think we're down to 32nd. yeah. where they were, they've always been trained for defensive fighting, not offensive. and that's why all of their doctrine has been geared towards a defensive. and that's why it's the russians have

a history of being able to counter that. they have an effective kind of expensive. that's what i see happening. i'm hearing they got weeks to train some of these people. i know it's there for and somebody even though it's not actively, no longer train somebody who can train someone to run through a minefield. there's no way to get through that column. nixon. markham aloof, thanks to buck. thank you, should thank you. so before we go, i want to remind you of our mission here, which is a really simple and i think you get a sense of it from this conversation. watch of dish, so i load the world right. we've got to stop living in these little boxes where you only know your true and maybe not your neighbors to, to stop the boxes everywhere. public sandra, i'll be looking for you again, right here to provide some direct impact the.