[000:00:00;00] the, the reason is it is combat. it is what it is ugly and it's going to be messy and it isn't. civilians are going to be hurt. well, i think that was, that will be led to that's up in the state of indian blood, shedding god as a rock regardless of the gas to climes existing $1500.00 times in less than 3 weeks. so these do i do because the escalade and almost another $100.00 to overnight. and it's important to us you recognize the effects by our minds. the loss happened in

the policy. didn't people have been subjected to 56 years of simple catching up the page as well? size of the un secretary general must quit off thinking suggested by a mazda of 12. so these were response to 56 years of the o. t goes on the roads and see how tensions we let them on how big is altered in mold in a 140000 people in northern is ready for the towers are because i feel like the life of elf grove, this is odd. see, my name is run her mom in 30 minutes of news on these star. now the us has said,

people need to accept. there's going to be most of that in casualties in god's as is very continues as s likes on the territory a ceasefire right now. really only benefits from us. this is for it is combat. it is bloody, it is ugly and it's going to be messy. and it isn't. civilians are going to be hurt going forward. i wish i could tell you something different. i wish that that wasn't going to happen, but it is, he's going to happen and that doesn't make it right, doesn't make it the dismissal. it doesn't mean that we are going to still express concerns about that and, and do everything we can to help. these rarely do everything they can to minimize it. but, but that's, that's unfortunately, that's the nature of conflict quote, you hate and there's comments that i was simply the humanoid using the situation that's happening in gauze or at the moment. and it's the 1st time we've heard this

from western powers from western media. if we look at the situation in se ukraine we'll see in the ways of thought was covered compared to what we think goals are at the moment. and also what we've seen in previous conflicts in the middle east in the past that just so a, it's a very different story when, when you create, install, say it in february of 2022. we. so all of you are full of western powers, including the us, talking about opening their arms to the white ukrainians, the europeans. so i think that is clear. what we're seeing here is there is a distinction between what we're talking about is the color of people's skin. and then finally we put on their lives. let's just give you a reminder of how some of the coverage was stolen to view claim last year. we are, sorry, it's really emotional for me because i see your p and people with blue eyes and loans here being to this isn't a place with all due respect, you know,

like iraq or afghanistan. this is a relatively civilized, relatively european. i have to choose those words carefully to we are in the 21st century. we are in a you routine city and we have cruise missile fire as though we were in a rock. we certainly don't see that kind of comfort when we talking about the thousands of children that have been killed in gulls. there was a huge double starting to take in the way that the school is being treated when you look at the war in ukraine. there was a suggestion that this could be a world march to the gates of brussels. we're now looking at these really goals at conflict as if they say some local parochial conflict. it's not going to expand further, but the reality couldn't be further from the truth. so say children have been killed, i've seen civilians, i've seen the women even health work as john list old have fallen victim to this. how was the western media coughing this whole complex?

well, this being an accusation of double stand, it's when we talk about the ukraine, who, whenever they was a strike that resulted in any casualties that included the victims being children. they were lost it all over the headlines, the number, the children, we knew everything about those children. the same company said, for those thousands of children in garza who will spend lives in the past 2 weeks. in fact, they've been simply overlooked. we've heard for unicef who's despite the number of deaths and injuries to children as being simply started going to the us as described people, people dying as being collateral damage. now, perhaps that shouldn't come as a shock because us administration of the us administration has really seen people as being collateral damage when it comes to war. even when the strikes the cause by the us themselves. back in 2021. the us. i strongly, kate. tough down the stone,

killing, 3 children, and this is how the us reacted to it. it's a tough scenario to be and it was a mistake. there was an honest mistake. that's a mistake. it's a really rateable mistake, as an honest mistake and all the state can you imagine having to try and explain that to the parents if those children that died, that those children were collateral damage and an honest mistake, it's really very difficult. and now is we see is well continuing to retaliate full those homeless attacks on october. the 2nd question many people are asking is when is enough enough? what is the limit to what the us would like to see before the pressure of the ally to say it enough is enough less stop the volunteer was very difficult to know what that point is. many humanitarian organizations think that point has already been reached, but just to give you an idea of what saving us military consent is to perhaps be

the limits. and then they have something called an n c, v. this is called a non combatants cottle folly. this isn't the limits of innocent people that can be killed by a command. i'm as an incidental killing as a result of the work or strikes that's going on the region. we don't have the figures, but for example, we do know that the value of one american citizens life is equivalent to the value of a 112 or rocky civilians or a 112 syrian at the civilians. so that gives you a sense of the value of the u. s. military and what values they put on life compared to us civilians. we don't yet know what valley the us puts on civilian life in palestine. still more about this and cause live to man. uh are they from c o and as and she's at ment press news that thanks for joining me. you recently wrote an article about how one side to the west,

the media reports on the news when it comes to the israel, gaza was, to what extent do you think the west and media coverage is biased in favor of israel? well, 1st of all, thank you so much for having me on. well, the, the us and western corporate mainstream media is extremely biased and it's on purpose. in fact, in a lot of cases, we've seen the organizations from the new york times, the b, b, c. the washington post cnn, directly working with the is really military and the is really government media as defined by our 1st amendment in the united states. and i'll just speak on behalf of americans here in our constitution. the media is supposed to act as a watch dog to those in power, not as a lot dogs to those in power. and so we have instances where the new york times

takes direct um gag orders from the state of israel and what they can and cannot report on when it comes to israel and palestine of their lead. a bureau chief in jerusalem has their off spring, actively participating in the is really military. we have instances where cnn takes stories about fake be headed babies. they go with that headline and then cnn. we had to see, we saw how see it and actually ended up retracting that story. and the same thing with the bbc, they take the directives directly from the is really military and the israeli government. and in this recent captive situation with the recent captive that was released from, from us through the humanitarian exchange through the international red cross. we saw that her interview that went viral that was live on is really tv.

she said that she was treated humanely by him as well as who was being held captive . and immediately after that, almost lapkins law keeps of all of the mainstream corporate media outlets from sky news to the bbc cnn. even um the new york times and the washington post, they distorted her interview and they only released certain clips of her interviews, not to not show that she was being treated humanely. so, oh no, sorry. so i, i hate to interrupt, but i did. we had, did we just see on the see it on cnn. jordan's clean ron it, if you appear, then sort of condemn is bombing. but cnn showed it so there must be some form of, uh, on bias or some sort of uh, uh, some sort of balance news here. what do you agree? what we're seeing,

outlets definitely showing the policy being perspective and showing the, the damage that has but been done to gaza. they're showing the devastation of the children being pulled out of rebels. but they're at a disclaimer. and every single one of their news reports that this is israel's, or tell a retaliatory defensive attack on gods in response to the events of october 7th, leaving out any sort of context to the fact that israel is occupying power. stein the policy use in gaza are living in an open air present in a concentration camp, where over 50 percent of the population are children. so well, some of the media coverage might appear to be showing the side of the palestinians, or of the devastation. they are in fact a betting israel's genocide and against god and civilians. but by not calling out

war crimes that are work crimes. israel is committing work crimes um, even according to the rome statute, they're committing the crime of genocide. they're committing the crime of apartheid . they're committing crimes against humanity by targeting schools, un shelters, and a convoys. and they're displacing over a 1000000 people in the process. and yet, the media, including cnn, is specially cnn. they continue to report on this as a defensive war, and that these palestinians are collateral damage. this is the same tactic that was being used after 911 when the us bombed us against in and iraq and millions of people died. the media is still seeing the same tunes of beating the drums of war, of dehumanizing palestinians as collateral damage as those as unworthy victims that deserve to be dead. i was reading a logical earlier today,

and it's interesting about the woods, the ease of highlighted, the how they say policy and has died, but is what is killed. is this the way that the media sort of tries to shape people's minds when it comes to specifically this call's until this war? and also when it comes, when we look up to recently the b, b, c, have us of re labeled thomas as a terrorist instead of minutes. and these are the specific words, the used in western media. how influential is that when it comes to reporting on the news? well, let's make it very clear that the bbc changed their label of him us after the is really military called on bbc to do that. and yet another example of how the bbc is taking direct orders by the is really military, whatever you may think of how i'm us of how much is a resistant, a resistance group that is based in gaza that is building hospitals

for civilians and schools. and the people of guys that have voted them in. and so when the outlets like the bbc, in fact it was the bbc leg with the headline that is rarely is were killed while palestinians nearly died. that goes to show that the life of israel is, are more where the middle life of palestinians. and this is a, you know, a war of narratives that the bbc and other mainstream outlets are pushing in justifying their support for the is really military's a carpet bombing of this open air prison. i mean, because it is a concentration camp. this is not a war between how mass and israel as the media are, are framing it to be. this is a war by israel, which is what the, what the 6th strongest and largest military in the world that is supplied by the number one military in the world. the united states against and m club a strip,

a concentration camp, where the infant mortality rate is extremely high, where 50 percent of the population are children. and again, one thing i want to mention with the bbc and other outlets like cnn, they have been given around the clock coverage of so called mass tunnels that are allegedly beneath the feet of every palestinian. once again, this is a lie that has been debunked time and time again by human rights organizations. it's a lie that has been shared by these outlets. it's a talking point by the is really military to justify the bombing of hospitals to justify the bombing of residential homes of the us monday. so my know, we have to really be careful about these kinds of disclaimers that the media push and a minute. um, i meant a word that you mentioned that a lie. now we probably,

you'd river initially. um, how mazda supposedly was accused of be heading, is ready. so the latest on, later on this was proven falls. i'm doing good. i mean, why do these journalists couldn't do to pull these claims without actually fact checking anything? is it uh, they are, they said a line and they have to just say what they want to say. now they don't, they just key words when it comes to palestinians. are a will, is ready, is, are angels, and that's what about, so sort of a richard. they want to push well, we have to remember the, it's not a conspiracy that a lot of the journalists that appear on cnn. uh, for example, have trading by the national security state. they have training by the us military to act as public relations arms for the military industrial complex and us forever

wars. and so when outlets like cnn take the word by netanyahu himself. so the man who has launched this, you know, egregious war against a concentration camp and helpless population, you can't help but wonder the conflict of interest that, that arise within the corporate mainstream media. and it is true that the story was retracted by cnn. after pushing that out, and in a lot of cases, even in organizations like political, they have released statements to their employees. i'm directing them to take a very pro israel line. and they've, in fact, in many cases have fired many of the many journalists who have refused to do so. the new york times has done this as well. um, and they've taken these requests at the, at the behest of the israel lobby like organizations like honest reporting. and so we really have to be careful when consuming mainstream corporate media. their

agenda is to push and to continue these forever wars and israel represents a proxy state for the military industrial complex. it's a major recipient of us military aid. and so every time israel drops a bomb on gaza and it is the executives at lockheed martin at raphael and the profit. and that's what fuels the military industrial complex. and so we have a corporate media, whether in the us or in the european union, we're going to continuously be pushing for these wars, whether it's the war in palestine or the war and ukraine. so that's why the united states and the states and great britain are the ones who continuously vote for these words to not. and at the way, i mean it was the us great britain who voted against the ceasefire in gaza. they don't want to see these conflicts and they may report to support human rights and democracy, but that is again

a lie. it's double speak. they don't represent human rights and democracy. they only represent the interest of the executives at lockheed martin and right. yeah. right. then i have to leave it that when i la and thank you so much for joining me . a pleasure talking to you see a editor in chief ment press news. thanks again for your time. i'll cost one of those. i'll see, i'll bring you an update of the latest information from both sides of the conflict, as well as other nations reaction from around the world today, where we're fully from several regions of garza and along the israel. and they've been on board at mazda $6005.05 of now being killed in just on the 3 weeks is really with talent 3 strikes. and one of the lights is of types. the idea of said it target admittance in the westbank setting of dinning, a warning the following footage contains disturbing images of

the. 7 in the southern dogs in the city upon news does report to the killed i'm the bid officer residential. this thing came on the fire fussing health of minutes. he says 2300 susan of now been killed. since we started the scenes, i just saw parents so big tom homan plates and hospitals and stone so so those of code for the incidence of patients, a lack of both medical supply, then solve is only compounding process. it will say for the hospitals have now run out of fuel for generates is cause of basically what the homes of trouble has more details on the back end with your institution across the others are still very worse and worse are because of

the situation that they face the electricity is really reaching the danger line next to us people, hospitals, there's a lot of affairs tracts, periodically, continuous air strikes next to the hospital. generators inside the hospital is not running very well, like some of the hospital is trying to borrow guys from another hospitals to run their generators, life and age, and hospitals in the north of the city. before 3 days they stop the electricity cut off on the hospital, complete. there's no electricity there. they were allowed to take some gas from another half cost me. why is the highest issue for through to fighting with almost one of the things along the shore line. the idea, so that lead to, to how much one of the since attempted to access is well by the see north of the

gaza strip off the entering a nearby beach in gaza via a kind of a footage posted by the is what he minutes. it shows a couple of naval vessels. 6, you know, the target logically seems to be kind of then be seen in the sea with the how much . so i was focusing out just above the water off season, middle east correspondent murray for national as well. now, on the latest developments in israel, out of the old going hostage situation, it was supposed to be a happy moment for the entire nation. the entire country eventually went a little bit the wrong direction. after being released from her master's give to tea, a lady in her h is resident of one of the jews specimens in south and israel. boulder in gaza, gave my name to be describing which she and other hostages had been through in these 2 weeks. how armed crowds stormed her house, how she was beaten with sticks. how gunman on

a motorcycle took her inside the guys 3 and how already on the ground inside in place, see in other hostages worth taking through the underground tunnels to a small room where about $25.00 other prisoners were already held. she basically said that she went to hell and back, but at the same time and the same interview, that lady also said that she was given access to medical care and that she was treated well while in cafeteria t, adding that the palestinian fighter is cared for all the needs of the prisoner is making sure none of them get 6 and also there was a doctor even visiting those in cafeteria to one's in 2 or 3 days. and despite the fact that significantly bigger part of the freed hostages, testimony was all about bad things happen to her and other civilians is really made a report that some is really officials with war. the positive remarks may damage is really interest leave should statements about the humane treatment of the hosp to

just at the hands of the homeless terrace harmed is rarely public diplomacy. it would have been appropriate at the very least to make it clear to lift shits or her family members. that message is in the spirit serve the enemy at a sensitive time. and it seems that the freed hostetter, his revelation is far from the only words that wore these rarely politicians. earlier. the litter of these rarely opposition lectured the international media on how to cover israel. him as conflict saying that if journalists are objective, it serves the him as militant groups have the international media is a could save. it says come us. if it just shows both sides, it says, come us. my argument. is it the media conscious claim to bring both sides of the story? if you do that, you're only bringing one homicide. that's cowardly and it's, it's lazy. it's an insult, insult to the victims, including the police thing and victims. it's also, i mean,

so to the core idea for, for journalism is, believe me. i know i wasn't real nice for 51 years. they will as well as oregon's time. us continues. it is the 19th day of our in swords, military operation. the idea says in the last day alone, your inexpensive air and into a re, strikes a foreign and destroyed hundreds of military and governmental sides in the gases, 3 belonging to her mass, including military headquarters, emanation storage is and launching positions of miss salas. this is where the army also says that a big number of how mass offer it says have been killed. earlier on tuesday, there was quite a disturbing statement by have mass military wing saying that the militants again managed to infiltrate israel and to enter one of the sacraments and israel south at the border with gaza and that they were clashing with the army. they are on the ground later. the idea of confirmed that information saying that the militants were

trying to use the underground tunnels leading to the beach. but these really air strikes, attack them, and there is no threat anymore. but the fact that there was an attempt by the middle to this, again, to infiltrate. israel was very disturbing and worried because i have to tell you that people here in israel is still afraid of the militants attack. and worrying that they could be a repetition of what's happened here on october. the 7th is really citizens living in the north where attention is with his bottle of growth rise as well. are among those who have the biggest fear is that the war that started in southern communities more during gas that will come to their homes to here's my report from these really lebanese border as we're driving to israel's north, where the country borders lab and on in the last 2 weeks, the id f and his bella have exchanged fire many times. it's the worst escalation since the 2nd lebanon, more in 2006. this 5 kilometer area has been declared a closed militarism. we have less then.

the tensions have 4 civilians from both sides of the boulder to flee. we know inside the city of city of small and i'm usually home to more than 22000 people now and to streets no lights in the window. although it's evening time i see someone hi, we're just from russia. the. 2 we don't see people here. what about do you, where are you going? well, why that was wanting to stay. why? what do you think about this situation? to very proving that really isn't very, very strong. and the only thing you good. thank you very much. for now,

more than 120000 people have been evacuated from around 40 sacraments and towns at the vote that was levon on from the highway we noticed a young man sitting at the entrance of his coffee shop. we keep on driving. we had a meeting, arranged with a resident of one of the jewish settlements at the boulder. at the entrance, the army stopped us. we cannot go in the streets inside like military activity. the soldiers say it is not safe here. below the bridge has collages with his bola to boulder, intensify the lebanese milton's group has not sufficiently joined the war against

these ro. but some locals fear hates on the matter of time. brief notion, archie and repulsing from northern israel and jerusalem. but you, as soon as we go, has rejected frame t condone thomas is actions in a recent speech saying is, was with miss interpretive. i am shocked by the me is that it presents ations by some of my statements yesterday in the security calls to is if there's, if i was just the finding x of data by i'm us, these is false. it was the opposite. nothing can justify the deliberate schooling, shooting and kidnapping of civilians or the launching of rockets against civilian targets. in this, i spoke of the grievances of the policy and people. i mean doing so. i also clearly stated on the quotes,

but the grievances of the policy that people cannot just defy the appalling attacks by i'm us and quotes is very officials had been cooling full of us. there are 3 journal to resign priming. a was onset for the jump. more of israel said what brought the visas, the, what officials due to his comment. you and she's had said passing suffered from oppression for decades. part of the reason for the subtract is important to also recognize the effects by our minds. the laws happen in the vacuum. the policy didn't people have been subjected to 56 years of sleep. okay, think occupation. they have seen that land sadly be followed by supplements and blake by violence that economies defaults that people displaced and their homes demolished. that hopes for the political solution to that applied and being vanishing that they gave it was use of the policy and people cannot justify the