and have a such a large protest in the grass. one i seem to do in most of the russians in the russian government was surprised, but i think that it, 008 emphasis. how complicated see 2 issues old. why is that? it's not just, is there a place to you and confront tissue biases, confrontation along, in some believe loosely and so who field can you press and that people are doing nothing, and on the loss. and that other than that people will see that behavior. how mazda 0 to unacceptable. so i was surprised as well as all my colleagues, nothing does. the russian government will take a dress a minute or 2 prevents sites, happenings. and i true that are you. are you believe all this process? well, i see that it's in some mental investigation. i think that the russian stage must be highly go with them. got to find the new building. it is possible because we plan these fighting into russia. if you truly do use old tools

possible to escalate situation in, in, in the process with the rest of the duration. but to see was to be very cautious about this issue. because we must dig deeper to understand what was, what were the part of products, is it? well, this disturbances find more on the ukrainian links to the disturbances in the russian, apple. it's on our web sites up see, dot com in the meantime, moneys be discards, but they might be back with more at the top of the hour. thanks for watching the hello. i'm manila chan you are tuned into modus operandi. she's brash file now influential and very powerful among the circles of a leads of both parties here in washington dc. no, i'm not talking about hillary clinton. i'm talking about victoria newland today. we'll examine just who this woman is and why she wheeled so much power,

having never been an elected official. alright, let's get into the m o the . she's got lots of nickname, the madam of my dad, the butcher, the nord stream, siren officially. so she's the artificial number 2 at the state department, make sense? victoria and jane newland, the child of an eastern european jewish father who was a surgeon and a christian british mother. she was born in 1961. she went to the prestigious brown university, but not much else is no nor, or told about this so called career diplomat. she joined the foreign service back in 1984 and has since clod her way to the highest echelons of and elected power in

the us. at one point, young victoria was a political officer at the us embassy in a new post soviet russia from 1991 to 1993 in 2005 under george w bush. she was the 1st female ambassador to nato. if her resume existed in a vacuum, it might sound quite impressive, but the reality of her career has had real life consequences for a great many people. so joining us to unpack this so called career diplomat is garlan nixon. he is a political analyst and co host of the critical our on radio. sputnik garland, thanks for joining us. so 1st your top line thoughts on miss victoria new and what's her place in the us political elite class? i think victoria newland represents a particular audiology end of the day in the,

in the elite class, a class. it is a very confrontational, expansionist, and in my opinion, i would argue a fascist ideology. one that believes in using brute force, while they pretend to be intellectuals, they pretend to be, you know, uh, you know, to use their thoughts and their education and their background to determine their future and determine the course of america in, in, in, in truth. these people are, i mean, and i hate to use this term, but i consider the knuckle draggers. these are the people who see the world through the lens of, you know, fangs and claws, us are viable. if you have the biggest findings and the biggest close, then you can rule the jungle. and they seem to believe that they have a right of that america and, and when i say america, i don't mean the united states. i mean the ideology that they,

for us america is the dominant ideology and culture and should be dominant throughout the world. so i think they're a very dangerous group of people because of their fact the fastest nature of the i, the ology, the authoritarian nature of their audiology. and most importantly, most importantly, their contempt an anger for anyone who disagrees with them at which, which inevitably to me it ever really means this, that the anger and the brutality and the tactics that they use towards their adversaries outside of their city or event fluids. the rushes, the china is the runs, etc, will be turned inward. they do not differentiate in their anger between external adversaries and internal adversaries. that's why they talk, they've talked about using their tools from the war on terror at home. they use terms like a domestic terrorism, basically they see their adversaries internally or externally asked people who must

be vanquished. they don't believe in democracy. you can look at her erstwhile conrad, tony blinking, who, his date, who under blinking, the state department does no democracy. and they simply do aggression. so i think that victoria knew, and we can talk about her as the individual, which is certainly a valid discussion to have because as an individual based on the, the results of her political actions and politically, the nations. a lot of people have died and a lot of people at people's lives have been disrupted. but i think it's a very important to talk about her through the context of this vicious neil con ideology that she represents. yeah, she sounds lovely. so right now, speaking of the state department, she is temporarily spitting in as the number 2 at state. she's the acting deputy

secretary of state, because when the sherman stepped out earlier this year, why hasn't joe biden ordered a confirmation hearing with congress for victorino? and i think that while the neo cons are unified in their, in their belief that military aggression and economic coersion are the most important tools of empire. i think he also, he joe biden, and his team also recognize that it can be quite off putting to the public. i think they also realize that so there is a, an element in the republican party, the populist element, the mag a element that finds these neo cons very distasteful. i think they also recognize that while they can control of the, the main stream, part of the main stream, elements of the republican party, that there are some elements that they cannot contain. and that these people are

likely to ask some questions and to present some things to the american people in the course of any hearings, confirmation hearings that would be extremely uncomfortable for video cards. and could in fact expose the bible machines, plants, and inner workings. when it comes to number one, ukraine, but even more importantly, i think at this point they're a tackling the word street. i think they are reticent to put one of the people on any stand in front of congress under threat of um you know, being held accountable for lying to congress. i think they're very, very wary of putting someone like that on the stand. because once the question started co coming in about the north stream attack, victoria newman would obviously have to shut down. she could not answer those questions because the truth is we all know the answer and the people would ask the

questions already know the answers. so i think the biggest issue that divided ministration is facing when it comes to getting in front of congress right now is the north stream attack, and they cannot afford to put a blinking or a sullivan or a newland, or that inner circle of joe biden, who clearly was involved in the planning and execution of the attack. they can't put them on the stand. the other thing about victoria newland is that while she's evil, she's not very bright, it's at 10. some tends to be the case with video cards. so in the uh, in after the north stream attack, tony blake and victoria newland. and some of the other neo kinds were going around, basically bragging about it, basically rubbing it into the face of the world. look what we've done. it's a great opportunity for us to go in and feel for every stinking dime in europe and leave the people in, in uh, you know, in horrible cold and disaster. but we'll make a lot of money and we'll still be in charge. there are free ead number one that

she'll be asked questions that will expose their involvement and then towards team attack and number 2, that she will not have the ability to hide her glee when it comes to that attack. and that she would likely say things that would expose them embarrassed them or in fact expose them to some kind of a legal um you know, uh jeopardy for their actions. yeah, definitely too much of her ugly history would emerge. now hang on to the north stream stuff. we will definitely address that later for sure. but for now, let's get personal on victoria. new and her husband is robert kagan, one of the architects of be a rock war, famed neal con birds of a feather. i guess, but no one claims to be a democrat, her actions would suggest otherwise, but here we have her sitting in yet another high profile roll under another

democratic poetess. first, it was under obama now. biden, are we to believe that her politics or her world view are somehow different than that of her husband's? a couple of things, you know, i could call myself a democrat. i could call myself a libertarian. i could call myself a cactus, it doesn't matter my, the ideology is what it is. my belief in how the world order should be either changed or maintained or what they are. so in america, we have been put weight into believing that the republicans and the democrats are at odds that they are having a knife fight. when in turn they are having a pillow fight entered. in reality, they are not fighting over the, particularly, they're not fighting over the issues of foreign policy. as i said, there is a small strain, a small element of populist in the republican party. while there are

a lot of things that they believe that i don't agree with, they certainly have been pushing back into some of the again, some of these, these foreign policy. um, debacles that the, that the, um, the democratic party has been leading this country into an of that the main stream . i'd say that again, i see the democratic party that the neo con establishment has been leading this, this nation into. so the idea of, you know, read the history, if you look at history, the most 0 and the stream of neil times in the democratic party. and really in both parties. to be quite frank arose from a guy named henry school jackson, who was a democrat if you look at his assistant, all named to of richard pearl and paul wolf with. if you go right now to london, the henry jackson society of the henry jackson institute. he is one of the,

of the fathers of modern neil con neoconservatism. and i would argue international militaristic, fascism, right? they want to make the world safe for uh, for international oligarchy, encrypts and criminals and corporations. so the discussion of neoconservatism is one that doesn't lend itself to a specific party, but the 2 of the best friends, the best deal, conservative friends, you know, would be a minute. a senator menendez neoconservative and lindsey graham, neal conservative, a democrat and republican. so i would in bondage people from interpreting the party affiliation of any particular politician in the united states with their foreign policy due certainly she's a democrat, but it tomorrow she can, will show wake up tomorrow and become

a republican if she needs to. it doesn't matter to them, they have an ideology and whatever label they need to use to execute their ideology they will use. i would argue that the democratic party, currently the democratic party of 2023 is a republican party of 2006. and they have a lot of the same supporters, the same people, the same funders. so it is what we're looking at is the, you know, the 4th iteration, or at least 3 and a half when it comes to the trunk administration. the 3rd and a half iteration of the george w bush administration, and a lot of the same people. so democrat republican, i use the term that you feel about most comfortable or least comfortable with. but look at what they're doing, look at their actions, and that'll tell you who they are. going to wings on the same bird. exactly. now, hold that thought about president obama. so coming up next, the mess that is ukraine began under brock obama when he set victoria newland

there to spread democracy and cookies. we'll discuss it when we return with garland nixon sit tight, the m o will be right back. the, the the,

[000:00:00;00] the, the welcome back to the m. o i manila chant. it's convenient to think that the conflict in ukraine began in 2022. but the reality is it goes back almost a decade before. and victoria newland was therefore,

it political analyst and co host of the critical our on radio split net, garland nixon is back with us. thanks for sticking around. garland. so speaking of obama, it was under his watch that we saw the massacre at my down square ukraine. victoria newland was there, handing out cookies just days beforehand. then this happened. that would be great, i think, to help glue this thing and have the un help fluid and you know, the, you know, exactly, and i think we've got to do something to make it stick together because you can be pretty sure that if it does, if it does start to gain altitude, the russians will be working behind the scenes to try to torpedo at garland. later we just heard there, we heard, we all heard this infamous we audio per se f, the e u, as she went about running through names of who to

a point into what would be ukraine's new government in 2014 or what was happening in that audio what were we hearing in real time? a couple of things were here. what we were hearing was u. s. foreign policy. in reality, us foreign policy is we have a right to over throw countries, and we have a right to insert a government as we choose. so, you know, we heard sausage being made basically the f, the u part. i think that's interesting because if we, if we look at new york, the new york on ideology as a rule, they have contempt for anyone who doesn't agree with them. again, they see adversaries, internal and external, right? so they see their adversaries, iran, china, north korea, russia, blah, blah, blah. okay. those are the externally adversaries. the interim adversaries include journalists such as you and myself, who would say, i don't agree with you, and i'm going to present evidence to support my positions. and any countries within their work with these facile countries of germany and france and blah, blah,

blah. they are not friends, they are convenient tools. so any time these convenient tools are not going along with what they want, they get angry at them, how dare you have in the unmitigated gall to try to stand up against your masters. so basically she wasn't saying f v you to jeffery pipe because when jeffery piatt said, hey, the use not going to be happy with this. what he was implying is that we should have some concern with the user input what he was implying. what cause the issue is not a person, it is not an individual a that's called the e u i. e u, how are you today? i'm busy right now. i'm having breakfast. that's not the way it works. this is a metaphorical person of the you. so he was implying a, we must have concern with the leaders of the you. they're not going to be happy with it. at that point,

she came out with the truth. i'm in new york on the these people work for me. they are, these people are our food, these people, this is how we eat. this is how we survive. they do not have the authority. just talk back to us. so at the e you didn't really need f, b, e, u as a cotton it, it meant f. the idea that we would allow these people do have some input into our policies. jeffery, in a way she was saying to buy to, to, to jeffrey. but if you shut up, what are you doing implying that i should be listening to these people? they are nothing. once we get this pipeline blown up, we're going to steal all their money and they're going to be a problem as to why should i care? it ain't gonna work out well for the okay, they're part of the equation here. that's when it gets knocked into the ground. so why should i have any concern for people who i'm going to rob blind as soon as i am able to enact my plan? that's the way i, i see it. yeah. so what, what does that audio,

expos about democracy in the you are, or even ukraine? a? well, it exposes that there is no democracy in ukraine. there is no democracy in the u. these are vassal states. i've put it like this, and i'll a, make it clear what i'm saying. the way i do you, ukraine is i view ukraine as a glove. and here's what i mean. when a criminal goes, you know, my background is in law enforcement. i was the investigator, i was commander of the investigations division, but it does take an investigator to figure this out. we've all watch movies when a criminal goes do in a movie, they go to commit a crime, they go to commit a bird or bird or whatever the case may be. what do they do? they put on a glove they put on a blackboard. it's always of lack of love and why is that to hide their fingerprints? they want to commit the crime. they want to execute the act, but they don't want to be held accountable for. they want to logical that deniability where you in the area. yeah, sure. but i don't have my fingerprint,

i didn't commit the crime the but the murder, right? that's all ukraine is. ukraine is a glove that the new kinds put on to hide their fingerprint, but not their fingerprints against russia. the neo cons. in fact, what the world to know, we took out russia, we destroyed this country, we wiped them out, we took them on, and we want, they want to be proud of that. so they can say to china, in iran and north korea, you better do what we said because look what we did to russia, so they don't need this black level of ukraine to hide what they want the world to know. but what they really want it for is to hide their fingerprints on the destruction of europe. what they're doing is they're reasserting their dominance over europe. if the europeans are able to get cheap energy from russia, their economy continues to build, they get stronger, and then they happen to leave. the united states will lose some power over the cotton and as they become economically more self sufficient, the neo cons have to put a street bring that to

a screeching halt. and they're using ukraine as that gloves, so their fingerprints won't be on it. so they can then say, well, yes, did we push the sanctions that took you out? sure. did we blow your pipeline up? well, we're not going to tell you admit that we did that, but yeah, of course we did it. but it was rushed out because we had to do the sites and we had no choice, blah, blah, blah, blah blah. anyway, you look at it, europe ends up destroyed. and the neo cons had on a glove which was york ukraine to hide their fingerprints. and to hide the reality that they are intentionally wiping out the european union. in fact, in john brooks, john boat, his book, he said that the neo cons, basically, after china, they viewed europe as the great economic threat to them because it's an economic block. if it becomes powerful they will listen to them anymore. in fact, emmanuel recruit and said we should have our own harvey. he wants europe to be an alternative poll in the unit polar world. but, but

a huge amount of can on your pole. none the less, but he wants it to be free or from the united states rule. and that's what that, you know, that's what, what, what this whole thing is about. it's about hiding. the us is in 10th and involvement in the economic destruction and the subjugation of the european cognitive. yeah, excellent analogy with the glove. uh so lets fast forward to 2022. uh noon was on the stand, addressing the north stream to pipeline blast. but the lead up to that for months on multiple occasions, we heard victoria new and alluding to threats against russia even the pipeline itself. her remarks were actually backed by president biden's. either gaps or allusions. what do you think was her involvement there as it pertains to the pipeline? well, what we see now is it's, it's certainly based on the information that we've gotten from seymour hersh. if

you choose to believe that based on seymour hersh is record. i certainly believe that it's far more likely than not that is there that his arguments are credible so that jake sullivan and joe biden's inner circle was involved. and if they were the impetus behind this attack, this military attack on germany. um and uh clearly uh that you've got joe biden, victoria newly jape sullivan, tony blinking as that inner circle of neil cards. those are the people who are behind this machine who are running this thing or sit in the driver seat. and i believe that it was, you know, a, put it like this. i love, i'm familiar with that. i love steam. crabs, you don't have to say to me, garland, would you like some steam grab if steam crabs are there. you know, garlands gonna eat him because he loves seats, and marilyn chesapeake bay thing. right. okay. it's like the, the, the maryland food fee is being crabs. right?

in the same way, regardless of whether victoria knew lynn was involved in the planning, which i suspect she was, they didn't have to ask. you don't have to say victoria moving, would you like, do you think it's a good idea? would you like to do it? no, because the ideology of victoria underwood aligns with the ideology of jake solomon aligned with the always ideology of tony blinking. so you don't have to ask that she was behind it 100 percent and do show that after the north stream pipeline blast. she came out as did tony blink, and as did the, one of the neo cons from poland, i forgot his name and an apple boss. husband. they came out and they couldn't help themselves. they had to celebrate. they had to do what we call and in here and american football there in the zone dance. you know, after some of these players score, they'll do all these dances in the end zone and celebrations. and that's what they were doing. they did the victoria newly and tony blinking,

and jake sullivan were doing, you know, back flips in the, in zone because they felt that they just score to touch them. so if she was involved, right, if she wasn't involved, which i think she was, it doesn't matter because that's the type of play that victoria knew any joy. and if she didn't do it, if she wasn't involved in it, she sure was involved in the end zone dance afterwards. a political analyst and co host of the critical hour on radio. sputnik garland nixon, thank you so much for waiting. and on this very important political figure. thank you very much. i certainly enjoyed the, the interview. all right, that is going to do it for this episode. i'm modus operandi to show that dig deep into foreign policy and current affairs. i'm your host middle a chance. thanks for tuning in, we'll see you again next time and figure out the m o.

the useful email. those are initial scrambling. nick builders and outputs miscellaneous mode that old what came showed mr. barn you still at the georgia nicholas low marquis and read to the doctor and of course with us some hear them for it anyways, jr. austin, i'm in march somewhat like we shift some of the mental, nice to policeman us loss. so let's to some of the kids to move. so that'll be the georgia i'm interested in. you'll see a check in the southern glass. you know, the same or starting place or to bring us it will gladly cause your you'll be black . be subsidized. 7, what a towards engine. loud enough. well,

you'll be protective that you're not on don x and i said i would just do the $290.00. she's going to learn a swing, which in kindergarten slip of edward. she's with the, the old squire. he's much so, but as the way it is for the wrong just don't you have to see power to conduct the application and engagement equals the trails. when so many find themselves will support. we choose to look for common ground, the are going to be cut off from the world. israel continues to deny god's that everything needed to stay monitored line. in the meantime,

the west collectively turn supply died to the collective, punish palestinians. the the for a 1000 people, the dead and gaza is israel intensified this ground, an account pains with communication outages from for invest. your efforts became detached from the world, given that all phone and internet services were cut off, making it impossible for the people to contact each other around accuses israel of crossing red lines in gaza. both fleming washington for it's on the waiver in support of israel. ok, the examines the breakdown of forces in the region of the conflict escalates and the disturbances that a russian efforts of a plane landing from tel aviv we're inside to buy a telegram news tunnel linked to ukraine. but the lease is,