company is always appreciate, it does get to take all websites, all t dot com for all the very latest. the take a fresh look around it. life kaleidoscopic isn't just a shifted reality distortion, by how of tired vision with no real opinions. fixtures, design to simplify will confuse really once a better wills, and is it just as a chosen few fractured images presented to this, but can you see through their illusion going underground? can the

the hello i'm manila chan. you are tuned into modus operandi. she's brash file now influential and very powerful among the circles of a leads of both parties here in washington dc. no, i'm not talking about hillary clinton. i'm talking about victoria newland today. we'll examine just who this woman is and why she wheeled so much power, having never been an elected official. alright, let's get into the m o. the . she's got lots of nickname, the madam of my down butcher. the nord stream, siren officially. so she's the artificial number 2 at the state department makes sense. victoria and jane newland,

the child of an eastern european jewish father who was a surgeon and a christian british mother. she was born in 1961. she went to the prestigious brown university, but not much else is no nor, or told about this so called career diplomat. she joined the foreign service back in 1984 and has since clod her way to the highest echelons of and elected power in the us. at one point, young victoria was a political officer at the us embassy in a new post soviet russia from 1991 to 1993 in 2005 under george w bush. she was the 1st female ambassador to nato. if her resume existed in a vacuum, it might sound quite impressive, but the reality of her career has had real life consequences for

a great many people. so joining us to unpack this so called career diplomat, it is garlan nixon. he is a political analyst and co host of the critical hour on radio. sputnik garland, thanks for joining us. so 1st your top line thoughts on miss victoria new and what's her place in the us political elite class? i think victoria newland represents a particular audiology independent in the, in the elite class, a class. it is a very confrontational, expansionist, and in my opinion, i would argue a fascist ideology. one that believes in using brute force, while they pretend to be intellectuals, they pretend to be, you know, uh, you know, to use their thoughts and their education and their background to determine their future and determine the course of america in, in, in, in truth. these people are,

i mean, and i hate to use this term, but i consider the knuckle draggers. these are the people who see the world through the lens of, you know, fangs and cause us are viable if you have the biggest findings. and the biggest clause that you can rule the jungle, and they seem to believe that they have a right of that america and. and when i say america, i don't mean the united states. i mean the ideology, just a few as america is the dominant ideology and culture and should be dominant throughout the world. so i think they're a very dangerous group of people because of their fact the fastest nature of the audio ology. the authoritarian nature of their audiology and most importantly, most importantly, their contempt an anger for anyone who disagrees with them at which, which enabling the inevitably means this, that the anger and the brutality and the tactics that they use towards their adversaries outside of their sphere of influence the rush is the china is the

around, is it cetera will be turned inward. they do not differentiate in their anger between external adversaries and internal adversaries. that's why they talk. they've talked about using their tools from the war on terror at home. they use terms like domestic terrorism, basically they see their adversaries internally or externally asked people who must be vanquished. they don't believe in democracy. you can look at her erstwhile conrad. tony blinking, who his the, who under blinking the state department does no democracy. and they simply do aggression. so i think that victoria knew, and we can talk about her as the individual, which is certainly a valid discussion to have because as an individual, based on the results of her political actions and political nations,

a lot of people have died. and a lot of people at people's lives have been disrupted. but i think it's a very important to talk about her through the context of this vicious neil con ideology that she represents. yeah, she sounds lovely. so right now, speaking of the state department, she is temporarily spitting in as the number 2 at state. she's the acting deputy secretary of state, because when the sherman stepped out earlier this year, why hasn't joe biden ordered a confirmation hearing with congress for victorino? and i think that while the neo cons are unified in their, in their belief that military aggression and economic coersion are the most important tools of empire. i think he also, he joe biden, and his team also recognize that it can be quite off putting to the public. i

think they also realize that there is a, an element in the republican party, a populist element, the mag a element that finds these neo cons very distasteful. i think they also recognize that while they can control of the, the mainstream part of the mainstream elements of the republican party, that there are some elements that they can not contain. and that these people are likely to ask some questions and to present some things to the american people in the course of any hearings, confirmation hearings that would be extremely uncomfortable for video cards. and could, in fact expose the divide regimes plants and inner workings when it comes to number one, ukraine. but even more importantly, i think at this point they're a tackling the word street. i think they are reticent to put one of the people on

any stand in front of congress under threat of um you know, being held accountable for lying to congress. i think they're very, very wary of putting someone like that on the stand. because once the question started co coming in about the north stream attack of victoria newman would obviously have to shut down. she could not answer those questions because the truth is we all know the answer and the people would ask the questions already know the answers. so i think the biggest issue that the bided ministration is facing when it comes to getting in front of the congress right now is the north stream attack. and they cannot afford to put a blinking or a sullivan or a newland, or that inner circle of joe biden, who clearly was involved in the planning and execution of the attack. they can't put them on the stand. the other thing about victoria newland is that while she's able, she's not very bright. it's as tens of tends to be the case with video cards. so in

the uh and uh, after the north stream attack, tony blinking victoria newland, and some of the other neo kinds were going around, basically bragging about it, basically rubbing it into the face of the world. look what we've done. it's a great opportunity for us to go in and pilfer every stinking dime in europe and leave the people in, in uh, you know, and horrible cold and disaster. but we'll make a lot of money and we'll still be in charge. there are free ead number one that she'll be asked questions that will expose their involvement in the north stream attack. and number 2, that she will not have the ability to hide her glee when it comes to that attack. and that she would likely say things that would expose them embarrass them or impact, expose them to some kind of a legal um you know, uh jeopardy for their actions. yeah, definitely too much of her ugly history would emerge. now hang on to the north

stream stuff. we will definitely address that later for sure. but for now, let's get personal on victoria new one. her husband is robert kagan, one of the architects of the iraq war, famed neal con birds of a feather, i guess. but no one claims to be a democrat, her actions would suggest otherwise, but, you know, here we have her sitting in yet another high profile roll under another democratic products. first, it was under obama now. biden, are we to believe that her politics or her world view are somehow different than that of her husband's? a couple of things, you know, i could call myself a democrat. i could call myself a libertarian. i could call myself a cactus. it doesn't matter my, the ideology is what it is my believes in how the world order should be either changed or maintained or what they are. so in america,

we have been good weight into believing that the republicans and the democrats are at odds that they're having a knife fight. when in turn they are having a pillow fight entered. in reality, they are not fighting over the, particularly, they're not fighting over the issues of foreign policy. as i said, there is a small strain, a small element of populist in the republican party. while there are a lot of things that they believe that i don't agree with, they certainly have been pushing back into some of the again, some of these, these foreign policy. um, debacles that the, that the, the democratic party has been leading this country into an, of that the mainstream. i'd say that again, i see the democratic party that the neo con establishment has been leading this, this nation into. so the idea, you know, read the history, if you look at history,

the most virulent strain of a, a neal kind in the democratic party, and really in both parties. to be quite frank arose from a guy named henry school jackson, who was a democrat. if you look at his assistant, i'll name to a richard perle, impossible for which if you go right now to london, the henry jackson society of the henry jackson institute. he is one of the, of the fathers of modern neil con neoconservatism. and i would argue international militaristic, fascism, right? they want to make the world safe for uh, for international oligarchy, encrypts and criminals, and corporations. so in the discussion of neoconservatism is one that doesn't lend itself to a specific party. so the 2 of the best friends, the best deal, conservative friends, you know, would be a minute. a senator menendez neoconservative and lindsey graham, neal conservative,

a democrat and republican. so i would in bondage people from interpreting the party affiliation of any particular politician in the united states with their foreign policy due certainly she's a democrat, but it tomorrow she can show wake up tomorrow and become a republican if she needs to. it doesn't matter to them, they have an ideology and whatever label they need to use to execute their ideology they will use. i would argue that the democratic party, currently the democratic party of 2023 is a republican party of 2006. and they have a lot of the same supporters, the same people, the same funders. so it is what we're looking at is the, you know, the 4th iteration, or at least 3 and a half when it comes to the trump administration. the 3rd and a half iteration of the george w bush administration, and a lot of the same people. so democrat republican,

i use the term that you feel about most comfortable or least comfortable with. but look at what they're doing, look at their actions, and that'll tell you who they are. going to wings on the same bird, exactly. now or hold that thought about president obama. so, coming up next, the mess that is ukraine began under brock obama. when he set victoria new in there to spread democracy and cookies, we'll discuss it when we return with garland nixon sit tight, the m o will be right back. the the

coffee is back after going dark, being cut off from the world. israel continues to deny god's that everything needed a modern line. in the meantime, the west collectively turn supply died to the collective punishment, palestinian, the, the most people don't understand the global financial system and how financial resources are distributed. or the dominant financial group, of course or, or the united states and your k bikes. their objective, is there a huge event controlling the world's money flows grants the power to wipe in time, nations of the face, of the government. to see if this to put in 3, in global, in the condition of september, the coke states. think of that. i mean, pretty for the rest of the police. give him dealing with some of those. when

we lived on a guy, the player, the good thing, the go with the book, are you out pull that were to present the apple store any k or seek us at that number? would it be me see? oh, the one good, all the all new to this old creek the the welcome back to the m. o i manila chant. it's convenient to think that the conflict in ukraine began in 2022. but the reality is it goes back almost a decade before. and victoria newland was there for it. political analyst and co host of the critical our on radio split net, garland nixon is back with us. thanks for sticking around. garland. so speaking of

obama, it was under his watch that we saw the massacre at my down square ukraine. victoria newland was there, handing out cookies just days beforehand. then this happened. that would be great, i think to help glue this thing and have the u. n. help fluid and you know, the, you know, exactly, and i think we've got to do something to make it stick together because you can be pretty sure that if it does, if it does start to again, altitude, the russians will be working behind the scenes to try to torpedo at, garland. later we just heard there, we heard, we all heard this infamous we audio per se f, the e u, as she went about running through names of who to a point into what would be ukraine's new government and 2014. what was happening in that audio? what were we hearing in real time? a couple of things we were hearing, what we were hearing was

u. s. foreign policy. in reality, us foreign policy is we have a right to over throw countries, and we have a right to insert a government as we choose. so, you know, we heard sausage being made basically the f, the e u part. i think that's interesting because if we, if we look at neil, cut the new york on ideology as a rule, they have contempt for anyone who doesn't agree with them. again, they see adversaries, internal and external, right? so they see their adversaries, iran, china, north korea, russia, blah, blah, blah. okay. those are the externally adversaries. the internal adversaries include journalists, such as you and myself, who say, i don't agree with you and i, but to present evidence to support my positions. and any countries within their orbit, these facile countries of germany and france and blah, blah, blah, they are not friends, they are convenient tools. so any time these convenient tools are not

going along with what they want, they get angry at them. how dare you have in the unmitigated gall to try to stand up against your masters. so basically she wasn't saying f v you to jeffery pipe. because when jeffery piatt said, hey, the use not going to be happy with this. what he was implying is that we should have some concern with the use input, what he was implying, what cause the issue is not a person. it is not an individual a. let's call the e u i e o, how are you today? i'm busy right now. i'm having breakfast, that's not the way it works. this is a metaphorical person of the you. so he was implying a. we must have concern with the leaders of the you. they're not going to be happy with it. at that point, she came out with the truth. i'm a neo con, the, these people work for me. they are, these people are our food, these people, this is how we eat. this is how we survive. they do not have the authority. just

talk back to us. so if the you didn't really need a f, b, e, u as a cotton it, it meant if the idea that we would allow these people do have some input into our policies. jeffery, in a way she was saying to buy, it's a to to jeffrey pi f, you shut up. what are you doing implying that i should be listening to these people? they are nothing. once we get this pipeline blown up, we're going to steal all their money and they're going to be a profit as to why should i care? it ain't gonna work out well for the, okay. they're part of the equation here. that's going to get knocked into the ground. so why should i have any concern for people go, i'm going to rob blind as soon as i am able to enact my plan. that's the way i, i see it. yeah. so what, what does that audio, expos about democracy in the you are, or even ukraine? a? well, it exposes that there is no democracy in ukraine. there is no democracy in the u.

these are vassal states. i've put it like this and i'll a, make it clear what i'm saying. the way i do ukraine is i view ukraine as a glove. and here's what i mean. when a criminal goes, you know, my background is in law enforcement. i was the investigator, i was commander of the investigations division, but it does the thinking investigator to figure this out. we've all watch movies when a criminal goes do in a movie they go to commit a crime. they go to commit a burglary, murder, whatever the case may be. what did they do? they put on a glove they put on a blackboard. it's always the black of the book is why is that to hide their fingerprints? they want to commit the crime. they want to execute the act, but they don't want to be held accountable for. they want to logical that deniability were you in the area? yes or, but i, you don't have my fingerprints. i didn't commit the crime the but them are right. or that's all ukraine is, ukraine is a glove. the neo cons put, don't want to hide their fingerprint, but not their fingerprints against russia. the neo cons. in fact,

what the world to know, we took out rush, we destroyed this country, we wiped them out. we took them on and we want, they want to be proud of that so they can say to china, in iran and north korea, you better do what we said. because look what we did to russia, so they don't need this black level of ukraine to hide what they want the world to know. but what they really want it for is to hide their fingerprints on the destruction of your what they're doing is they're reasserting their dominance over europe. if the europeans are able to get cheap energy from russia, their economy continues to build, they get stronger. and inevitably, the united states will lose some power over the cost, and then as they become economically more self sufficient, the neil cons have to put a st, bring back to a screeching halt, and they're using ukraine as that gloves. so their fingerprints won't be on it. so they can then say, well, yes, did we push the sanctions that took you out?

sure. did we blow your pipeline up? well, we're not going to tell you admit that we did that, but yeah, of course we did it. but it was rushed up because we had to do these sites and we had no choice, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. anyway, you look at it, europe ends up destroyed. and the neo cons had on a glove which was your ukraine to hide their fingerprints. and to hide the reality that they are intentionally wiping out the european union in fact. and john brooks, john bolt was booked. he said that the neo cons, basically, after china, they viewed europe as the great economic threat to the because it's an economic block. if it becomes powerful, they will listen to them anymore. in fact, emmanuel macro and said we should have our own harvey. he wants europe to be an alternative poll in the unipolar world, but, but a huge amount of can only a poll, none the less, but he wants it to be free or from the united states rule. and that's what that,

you know, that's what, what, what this whole thing is about. it's about hiding. the us is intent and involvement in the economic destruction and the subjugation of the european cognitive. yeah. excellent analogy with the glove. uh, so lets fast forward to 2022. uh noon was on the stand addressing the north stream to pipeline blast. but the lead up to that for months on multiple occasions, we heard victoria new and alluding to threats against russia even the pipeline itself. her remarks were actually backed by president biden's. either gaps or allusions. what do you think was her involvement there as it pertains to the pipeline? well, what we see now is it's, it's certainly based on the information that we've gotten from seymour hersh. if you choose to believe that i based on seymour hersh his record, i certainly believe that it's far more likely than not that is there that his

arguments are, are credible that jake sullivan and joe biden is inner circle was involved and that they were the impetus behind this attack, this military attack on germany and clearly of that you've got joe biden, victoria newly james sullivan, tony blinking as that inner circle of neil cards. those are the people who are behind this machine were running this thing, just it in the driver seat. and i'd be leads that it was, you know, a put like this. i love, i'm familiar with that. i love theme crowds. you don't have to say to me, garland, would you like some steam grab? it's deem crabs are there. you know, garlands gonna eat him because he loves seats and marilyn chesapeake bay thing. right. okay. it's like the, the, the maryland food fee is being crabs. right? in the same way, regardless of whether victoria newman was involved in the planning,

which i suspect she was, they didn't have to ask. you don't have to say victoria moving, would you like, do you think it's a good idea? would you like to do it? no, because the ideology of victoria underwood aligns with the ideology of jake solving . it aligns with the always ideology of tony blinking. so you don't have to ask that she was behind it 100 percent. and to show that after the nord stream pipeline blast, she came out as did tony blink. and as did the, one of the neo cons from poland, i forgot his name there. and apple boss, husband, they came out and they couldn't help themselves. they had to celebrate, they had to do what we call and in here in american football there in zone dance. you know, after some of these players score, they'll do all these dances in the end zone and celebrations. and that's what they were deal with. they did the uh, uh, victoria, newly and tony blinking and jake sullivan were doing, you know, back flips in the, in zone because they felt that they just score to touch them. so if she was

involved, right, if she wasn't involved, which i think she was, it doesn't matter because that's the type of play that victoria knew any joy. and if she didn't do it, if she wasn't involved in it, she sure was involved in the end zone dance afterwards. a political analyst and co host of the critical hour on radio split next garland nixon. thank you so much for waiting. and on this very important political figure. thank you very much. i certainly enjoyed the, the interview. all right, that is going to do it for this episode of motors operandi to show that dig deep into foreign policy and current affairs. i'm your host middle of chance. thanks for 2 and again, we'll see you again next time and figure out the m o. the

recently my little just the scrambling nikoto is and up. i misunderstood what the told what came shelton net of understood the origin and it was little dark. we hadn't read it, so it actually sits in, of course, with us to get in for it and it was doing in house and i'm in your smart, somewhat like we shift. so the name adults nice to fully spent a lot. so there's to some of the kids to move. so sort of in the doors you, i'm interested in, you'll see a check number 7 allows you to see more solid waste the to bring us into loud because you're, you'll be blacked dyslexia dice them in one or towards engine loud enough. well, you'll be protective that you're not on donnie. and i said i would just do the

$290.00. she's going to learn a swing, which in kindergarten, the slave forget or to the, the old squire. he's much so, but that's the way it is. but the problem is that there wasn't any confusion inside. they say the community, you know what happened after the after the 7. okay. and the government, the government, but this would be part of what they want. it's gonna take them all this from the sides. nobody is to read the we'd be finishing 1st come us because you know, i'm us, gosh, the, [000:00:00;00]

the, we know that there was supposed to be a cease fire and you were supposed to release that says you promised. however, we're suffering from your political security and military failure. and i suppose for a video of several is ready hostages to say policy, phase 5 prime minister netanyahu all the reasons why that's still in service. how this time site is ready for sins of attack. she has another hospital in gauze, if it was a wedding spark like to cope with wounded civilians, die i shall take just aside since the death told him dollars is the policy is a 1000 feet when it is well intensified is grounded as tugs with tyler called