the, the so i see the do not want to deal with the the

2023 could be deemed the year of the blame game. as it seems. no one wants to take responsibility for problem from the economy to food shortages, to the rise and mental health illnesses, to relationship troubles. the latest target for the walls of the world is the world itself. i'm sky now. he's in on a this edition of 360 view. we're going to look at the validity of the climate change blame game. let's get started. the, remember when everything caused cancer? well now climate change causes everything. people are blaming natural disasters. the conflict in ukraine divorce and even a rise in domestic abuse on climate change. you know who ways of getting the blame

the big corporations who dep, millions of tons of waste into our oceans and landfills every year, killing fish and sending toxic chemicals into our land and waterways or maybe a climate change isn't the problem is the pollution of the world we live in with not just actual toxic waste, but the secular world view eating its way into our politics, schools, businesses, and even home from governments are what caused a warren ukraine. the rise and social media with too many options, the inability to commit to monogamy. and this illusion of the sacred fund of marriage is what is actually causing divorce. gritty power companies are sparking mass of wild buyers and equipped idiots and the desert, causing the burning man fiasco excuse of climate change. simply is being used to divert power, torture in governments, all to gain control of how you commute to work. when you hit your home and yes,

even click on your stove, but what is the actual science behind climate change? in joining me now to discuss whether there is any validity to the blame it. climate change game is patrick, more ecologist and environmental list, founding member of greenpeace. thank you for joining us, patrick. patrick, i want to start off. do you think climate change has become a scape goat for the various challenges facing society today? well, i'm not sure about scape goat, but it certainly has become a way of filling people full of terror and scaring them half to death, and therefore being much more pliant in and being the people in charge. i think it's being used as a weapon. uh there's, there's no doubt at all that gets a complete false fluid uh that there is a climate emergency or climate crisis of any kind. the weather has been happening since the world began. that was 4600000000 years ago. and it was much more extreme

in many times in the past. it was only 20000 years ago when the entire country of canada and half of russia recovered the sheet of ice more than a mile sick. and then that that melted partly, we're still in the place to see an ice age. that's another ridiculous assertion that it's getting too hot, when in fact this is one of the coldest periods in the history of the earth. that is why there are these huge ice sheets on the arctic and antarctica, and they are not going away any time soon. they keep, you know, at al gore predicted they'd be gone already. they're not, they're still there. and for us in the, in the, in the, in the winter, the arctic ocean, if there isn't one square inch of that isn't frozen over, they always show you the summer ice when it shrinks back from the russian from north north america. to cover about half the arctic ocean, but then every winter, it covers the entire arctic ocean of the other factor as it is so important

is that there is no historical evidence that c o 2 is a main driver of temperature at and not even in the slightest, it's been out of sync with temperature for most of the history of yours. and it happens to be that we're in a slight warming period now. and we started replenishing the atmosphere with c o 2, which had come down to a level lower than it ever had been in the history of the earth. that's 4600000000 years 20000 years ago. in the peak of the most recent lacey ation in this place to see an ice age c o 2 saying to $180.00 parts per 1000000, which is only 30 parts per 1000000 above when planned start to die. we are replenishing the c o 2 that life took out of the atmosphere and the oceans over the last 3000000000 years. most of it in the last half 1000000000 years. when sea creatures learn to make shells from calcium carbonate. although shelves up and you

end up on the bottom of the ocean, turning into limestone, where the white cliffs of dover, which are the skeletons of taco listed for us, which are a microscopic fido plankton plant at the base of the food chain in the c. and there, there are 100000000000000000 tons of carbon locked up in carbonaceous rocks, all of which is of life origin. all of which was sucked out of the ocean. and to some extent, the atmosphere, the atmosphere, the forest turned into coal. so that was atmosphere at c o 2 that ended up buried in the ground forever until we came along. so in fact, we are the salvation of life in the we are replenishing the c o 2 that life inadvertently hit mean they didn't do it on the plankton weren't thinking. let's take to all the c o 2 out of the water, but that's what happened because they invented a way to make armor plating for themselves. if you think of a clam, imagine how easy it would be for a predator to get

a clam. if it didn't have that shell on it, the shelves are like, harm are on a night. and so there's many, many, many species figured out how to do that. and that's why there's a 100000000000000000 tons of carbon in the form of carbonaceous rocks, limestone. marble and shock are all of life origin. and they all contain carbon that came from carbon dioxide. it's, i could go on forever about the subject, but i'll leave it there. but that is the truth. is there a difference between climate change and global warming? as they are often confused, it seems, well they, they, they changed it to climate change when it stopped warming for about 20 years back in the ninety's. and so then they said, well, all of a sudden now a change to cooling was, was called climate change. you can call it global warming because it was cooling. so it goes in cycles on cycles, on cycles. the most interesting one in modern times is the 1000 year cycle, the,

the roman warren period 2000 years ago. then then the dark ages, which was a cold period and a miserable period in the, in around $580.00. then $1080.00 came the embed evil one period which was even warmer than now in some places. and, and then it went into another cold period called a little ice age peaking around 1680. and since then for the last 400 years or so, it has been warming slightly one degree celsius. it's not, it's absolutely not even significant. the level of warming that has occurred, the earth was so much warmer than this prior to this ice ice age where he and, and that is the great irony, they're saying it's a climate emergency of heat when 10 times as many people die from cold as die from heat, even in asia and africa in the, in the warmer countries,

more people die from cold and from heat. those stats are irrefutable. it's easy to find them. and it's a fact we are in fact a tropical species. the we're not like polar bears, which are indeed a polar species that evolve because the ice came and they, the polar bear is a descendant of the year raising and browned bear, which we call grizzly bears. they came here from the old world when you could walk across the burying land bridge during the glassy agents. and so the polar bear is actually would not exist if it weren't for climate change because it didn't exist before the earth went into the ice age 2 and a half 1000000 years ago. and probably about a 1000000 and a half years ago. the bears were able to get on the ice and hunt seals and eventually evolved into what we have to do called the polar bear, which is half half again as big as the brown bear if you it descended from. because

they have to pull a $300.00 pound seal out of a hole in the ice. so they need it to be stronger to be more efficient. and they turned white because of the ice being a camera flies. and their digestive system is geared more to a carnivorous diet, whereas the verizon land have a lot of plants matter in their diet. so that, that's, it is kind of ironic that if it weren't for climate change, there would be no polar bears. and yet they're saying that climate change is a threat to the existence of poor bears and show a picture of one swimming in the water, as if it doesn't know where it's going. their nickname is, see there's, and they know when they jump in the water where they're going, they know it just jump in and go off to be drowned or whatever like they make out. and then they show a really old, there in the summer when there's no snow on the ground. so it looks like the arctic ice is gone, which it does on the islands up there in the summer. and it's dragging his hind feet because it's so old. it's probably lost all his teeth,

and polar bears don't. there's no old folks homes for polar bears. they die in the wild and, and when you take a picture of one, like national geographic did and then put underneath, this is the face of climate change. as if climate change caused to bear to get ahold or is it that it's just goes way too far and a pretty well all the publications are in the world except for a few have bought into this sensation lism about the climate. when in fact, there is no crisis about the climate, hurricanes have been with us forever when the earth warms, actually hurricanes diminish. because when the earth warms as it was millions of years ago, the polls are much warmer, but the equator stays about the same. and back to us being a tropical species, we came from the equator. we came out of africa only because we had fire, shelter, and clothing. we could not live in most of the world if we didn't have those things . we would die of the cold very quickly, like the 1st winter coming on. if we went,

if we went out of africa without those necessities. and so they, you know, the control of fire, of course, was, i guess you could mark that as the beginning of human civilization when age turned into people and, and went on from there to inventing all kinds of tools and etc. but just look at us today, 8000000000 people are actually able to survive with way fewer in poverty than were when there was only 4000000000 people or 2000000000 people. and now they're telling us we have to give up our main energy source. fossil fuels, in order to save the world from climate disaster. this is the stupidest decision that has been made by the high level people in our, our, our society and our politics. the stupidest decision that has ever been made in human history. other than going into world wars and is this,

this could be even worse than a world war. if we were actually to stop using more than 80 percent of the energy we use to keep ourselves alive every day. how much of this is happening because of man's actions versus the natural progression? well, we have had a fixed on the environment, of course we've turned for. busy a student to feels to grow food. we've made cities, but in fact the cities don't even cover 3 percent of the land. and the land is only about 25 percent of the surface of the years. there's no cities in the oceans. so the, the, the, the, the urban areas of this world don't cover very much at all. and i don't understand why people don't just look out the window when they're flying across the country and see how much of it is green and beautiful and productive. it's not as if we've turned it into a death, a dead landscape or anything. i'm a mine. yes. a very tiny fraction of the earth is,

is affected by mines. and when they finish wisdom, now they re vegetate them and same with the oil sands in canada. they show these pictures of the earth being dug up, which are not very pretty. but all of those areas are re reclaimed with native vegetation and trees and just look, looks like nothing's ever happened there. and it's a blink in the eye of history to have that place being opened up for a short period of time. while you take the minerals or the oil or whatever it is, you need. very interesting, thank you, patrick play stick around. because after the break, we're going to look at the motivation behind the climate change this area, the russian states. never as tight as i'm sort of the most sense community best.

nothing has all sense of the speed. what else holes? question about this? even though we will then in the european union, the kremlin media mission, the state on russia to day and split the ortiz full neck, even our video agency, roughly all the band on youtube. the question, did you say stephen twist, which is the, or take a fresh look around his life kaleidoscopic, isn't just a shifted reality distortion by power to division with no real opinions

fixtures designed to simplify. it will confuse really once a better wills, and is it just because it shows you few fractured images presented to this, but can you see through their illusion going underground? can the exception that i'm here to plan with you? whatever you do, do not watch my new show search like why watch something that's so different whitelisted opinions that he won't get anywhere else working with plans or do they have the state department, the c i a weapons makers, multi $1000000000.00 corporations. choose your fax for you, go ahead, change and whatever you do. don't want my show stay main street because i'm probably going to make you comfortable. my show is called stretching time,

but again, it's not. we don't want to watch it because it might just change the way you we are back with our guest, patrick, more ecologist and environmental is founding member of greenpeace. patrick, who is profiting off of this hundreds of organizations i've, maybe it's thousands of organizations are profiting from this fear. people are giving them money in order to save them from the climate catastrophe. and then you have the, the interesting fact that the 2 largest assemblages of private jets in the world are at the world economic forum in dave, us. and at the inter governmental panel on climate change meeting, which happens in different capitals around the world. each year was born, they are the ones who have the all the private jets because they're, they're, they're the wealthiest people in the world. and they are taking advantage of this.

and, and some of the hare brained schemes that come out at bill gates just gave $6000000.00 to an organization which their approach project is to cut all the trees down in 10000 square miles. that's 70000000 acres of forest and buried the trees in the ground. so the carbon can't go back into the atmosphere when the trees decompose. instead of using it for firewood or buildings or paper, they're going to buried all all these trees in the ground. and i guess eventually they'll turn into coal in a 1000000 years or 2, and then they won't be allowed to dig them out and use them for fuel because we wouldn't want that carbon dioxide getting into you're, i'll tell you one thing to remember. anybody who calls c o 2 carbon should immediately be dismissed. scientists do not call things that they aren't. carbon

is a different thing. carbon is graphite carbon. it is so it carbon has a lot of forms just as an atom. an element. lucky balls is another one. we invented them at named after buckminster fuller. it's an amazing lattice work of carbon because carbon has 4 bonds on it, and so it can end it and it can combine with nearly every other adam in the world. that's why it is the center of life. because life has a lot of very complex compounds in it, and carbons is able to be part of all of them. whether it's the proteins or the fats, or the sugars or, you know that they're not part of bone as far as i know, but they're part of all the fleshy parts of us is made of carbon. and so people who call c o 2 carbon should be dismissed immediately because there are they are distorting the the use of language. if you're going to be talking about science,

they call us carbon change or climate change deniers and carbon deniers. and we don't deny anything, we just know certain things are true and, and others things are not. and what were there it is. again, i start to repeat. there is no evidence in the long term history of the earth. that c o 2 is a major player in the temperature of the years, climate, none, whatsoever. it is, it is just a made up thing. the reason i titled my book fig, invisible catastrophes and threats of do. and that i queen the term the secands visible catastrophes because almost everything that is used as a scare story is something invisible. carbon dioxide is clearly invisible. no one can see what it's doing. no one can feel what it's doing. the same thing for

radiation, they use it as, as a bogeyman. when in fact there's over a 100 nuclear plants in north america and nobody's ever been hurt by them. never mind killed the only the last people that were killed by nuclear plant were in charitable, which was a stupid designed nuclear plant. it blew up. no other plant has ever blown up like that. and if, unfortunately in focus stream it, they allowed the hydrogen gas to explode in the containment structures that could easily have been breached and let it out. so it didn't do that, that one after another, they let that happen. that was, that was a, i wouldn't call it a comedy of errors, a tragedy of errors, and they didn't need to happen. there were so many things wrong with how fukushima was designed and how badly they handled the accident. still no one was killed in that accident by radiation. 2 people were killed by this anatomy when it came to shore an hour after the earthquake and 20000 people died just from the sioux. now

me itself. never mind any radiation. i mean, they made it seem as though fukushima was more important than the 20000 people being washed into the sea. so, uh that, but that's because it's invisible. my favorite one is g hmos. what is in g m o's that is bad? what's its name? apparently it doesn't have a name, therefore it doesn't exist. it's just a made up thing. there's nothing that n g m o is. and any scientist who is understanding biology knows that to be true. but they still carry on is if there is something bad going to happen to you, if you eat a genetically modified food and even the term genetically modified is misused. we are all genetically modified. none of us look exactly like our parents. we are half, half, and half are paying our mother and father. so we are, we are

a modification of the original genetics. it was in either one of them. and it, it, it's very hard to be a scientist these days. and but the tide as you have to, if you know what's true as the founder of green piece, you obviously care about the earth. so it is blaming climate change. hurt the conservation movement. very much so. uh, if indeed they took away all the fossil fuels, we would ravage this planet pretty badly to try and stay alive. and you know, the reason i left green piece was very clear. all the campaigns we did while i was there, i agreed with. except i was wrong about nuclear energy back then. so many of us got caught up in that idea that radiation was going to harm everybody.

it took me quite a while to realize that nuclear energy should not be lumped in with nuclear weapons . it should be lumped in with nuclear medicine as a beneficial use of nuclear technology. but beyond that, it came a time when i was the only international director of green piece of the 6 of us that had any formal science education. the rest were activists and politics and all of that. and they decided that green patient started a campaign to ban chlorine worldwide, because chlorine is very toxic, it's part of d d t. it's part of p. c. b's. and it's put part of all kinds of chlorinated hydrocarbons, but it's also the most important element for protecting public health by putting it into our drinking water and preventing color and other waterborne diseases. it's also so that 75 percent of our medicines are made with chlorine chemistry and 25

percent of them have chlorine in them. if you look at the, your flu and cold medications, you'll see a little cl after some of the compounds in there. and in addition, table salt, sodium chloride is any central nutrient. you could kill yourself if you put a cup of it in your stomach, you'd be hydrogen die. and that's why it's toxicity of the main mantra in talks. the city is the poison is in the dose. many elements and compounds are essential at low doses. don't hurt you much if you take too much more of it. but eventually we'll kill you. and chlorine is one of those. and so i just said you guys, you got to be slightly more nuanced about this because chlorine is one of the most important elements for life as well as being something that can kill you if you breathe it in as an element like the germans used it in world war one as

a weapon and you know, you can use a gun for hunting or for a murder. so it, it, it's just ridiculous. i said you guys we, i can't be here if you're going to be against corey. and that was the way it worked . i just wrote a nice letter and said see you later. thank you. at patrick moore, ecologists environmental list, founding member of the green piece. there is no doubt the climate is changing, but how much of that is based on the actions of mankind, or just an agent planet? maybe i would have a better time respecting the politicians and scientist if they're life reflected their own sermons on sky. now here's, and this has been your 360 view of the news affecting you. thanks for watching the

there's no end in sight over how you're going to continue to destroy the earth. is the case of the med, most of the people i tried to go to the gym, but i'm certainly not ready to fight russia. this is also absurd. this is the 3rd world lunacy re washing press for. so the funder line likes to say, we have the tools while we just start with stability and visit this deal. so just let me, let me on that you have very quick propaganda. you know a price here in your i think we don't know the aftermath any time that you're not allowed to ask questions, you should ask all of the questions. the more questions ask the better the answer is will be the

so i see the do not want to deal with the, the sense world war 2 united states as foster extremist and t russian

prejudices and hatreds among the ukrainian d. as for in at least in canada, united states and countries in eastern europe, probably everywhere. and it doesn't matter what these groups say or do it will support them. if it is, the groups are causing hatred and chaos within the target country. joe again might done choose but who should consecrate dell or sort of do when i was one of the email myself, it has these up and it was interest of the portal. let me see, i see a use is anyone at anything if there's a religion the

the sky lit up over a gallery of the idea of the ground incursion into the end play comes alongside or strikes across the region. also a head on the program, the guy, so he's becoming go get a job such as kind of goes on boys that reportedly the cubans, 14 just every day. the un secretary, general solomon's the alarm of the grim at death colon jobs is burying for future generations. as the number of palestinians killed reportedly surpasses $10.00 in one month ago how most attacked israel displays the records from the nova festival . the relatives also has taken hostage to the government must do more chip.