[000:00:00;00] the, the fillings, the mania has run its course interest in the proxy war in russia is fading. calves . one type of color offensive is a bus whispers, and rumor suggests there are those in the west to believe the time is coming to pull. the plug on zelinski fits was always inevitable. the

2023 could be deemed the year of the blame game. as it seems, no one wants to take responsibility for problem from the economy to food shortages, to the rise and mental health illnesses, to relationship troubles. the latest target for the was of the world is the world itself. i'm sky now. he was in on of this addition of 360 view. we're going to look at the validity of the climate change blame game. let's get started. the, remember when everything caused cancer? well now climate change causes everything. people are blaming natural disasters. the conflict and ukraine divorce and even a rise in domestic abuse on climate change. you know, who wasn't getting the blame the big corporations, who dep, millions of tons of waste into our oceans and landfills every year,

killing fish and sending toxic chemicals into our land and waterways. and maybe climate change isn't. the problem is the pollution of the world. we live in with not just actual toxic waste, but the secular world view it its way into our politics, schools, businesses and even home clubs. governments are what caused a warren ukraine, the rides and social media. with too many options, the inability to commit to monogamy and this illusion of the sacred bond of marriage is what is actually causing divorce. gritty power companies are sparking massive wild buyers and equipped idiots and the desert, causing the burning man fiasco excuse of climate change. simply is being used to divert power, torture and governments all to gain control of how you commute to work when you hit your home. and yes, even cook on your stove. but what is the actual science behind climate change?

joining me now to discuss whether there is any validity to the blame it. climate change game is patrick, more ecologist and environmental list, founding member of greenpeace. thank you for joining us, patrick. patrick, i want to start off. do you think climate change has become a scape goat for the various challenges facing society today? i'm not sure about scape goat, but it certainly has become a way of a ceiling people full of terror and scaring them half to death, and therefore being much more pliant in being uh the people in charge. i think it's being used as a weapon there's, there's no doubt at all that gets a complete false fluid. uh that there is a climate emergency or climate crisis of any kind. the weather has been happening since the world began. that was 4600000000 years ago, and it was much more extreme in many times in the past. it was only 20000 years ago in the entire country of canada and half of russia were covered the sheet of ice

more than a mile sick. and then that that melted partly were still in the place to see an ice age. that's another ridiculous assertion that is getting too hot, when in fact this is one of the coldest periods in the history of the earth. that is why there are these huge ice sheets on the arctic count antarctica and they are not going away any time soon. they keep, you know what that al gore predicted they'd be gone already. they're not, they're still there and force in the, in the, in the, in the winter, the arctic ocean. if there isn't one square inch of that isn't frozen over. they always show you the summer ice when it shrinks back from the russian from north north america to cover about half the arctic ocean. but then every winter, it covers the entire arctic ocean. of the other factor is that it is, is so important is that there is no historical evidence that c, o 2 is

a main driver of temperature at and not even in the slightest. it's been out of sync with temperature for most of the history of yours. and it happens to be that we're in a slight warming period now. and we started replenishing the atmosphere with c o 2, which had come down to a level lower than it ever had been in the history of the earth. that's 4600000000 years 20000 years ago in the peak of the most recent, lacy ation in the place to seeing ice age c o 2 saying to $180.00 parts per 1000000, which is only 30 parts per 1000000 above when planned start to die, we are replenishing the c o 2 that life took out of the atmosphere and the oceans over the last 3000000000 years. most of it in the last half 1000000000 years. when sea creatures learned to make shells from calcium carbonate. although shelves, up and up on the bottom of the ocean and turning into limestone,

where the wait list of dover, which are the skeletons of clock alyssa forest, which are a microscopic fido plankton plants at the base of the food chain in the see. there, there are 100000000000000000 tons of carbon locked up in carbonaceous rocks, all of which is of life origin. all of which was sucked out of the ocean. and some extent the atmosphere, the atmosphere is a for us turned into coal. so that was atmosphere at c o 2 that ended up buried in the ground forever until we came along. so in fact, we are the salvation of life in that we are replenishing the c o 2. that life inadvertently hit mean they didn't do it on the plankton weren't thinking. let's take to all the c o 2 out of the water, but that's what happened because they invented a way to make armor plating for themselves. if you think of a clam, imagine how easy it would be for a predator to get a clam. if it didn't have that show on it, the shelves are like, harm or on a night. and so there's many, many,

many species figured out how to do that. and that's why there's a 100000000000000000 tons of carbon in the form of carbonaceous rocks, limestone, marble and shock are all of life origin. and they all contain carbon that came from carbon dioxide. and it's, i could go on forever about this subject, but i'll leave it there. but that is the truth. is there a difference between climate change and global warming? as they are often confused, it seems, well they, they, they changed it to climate change when it stopped warming for about 20 years back in the ninety's. and so then they said, well, all of a sudden now a change to cooling was, was called climate change. you can call it global warming because it was cooling. so it goes in cycles on cycles on cycles. the most interesting one in modern times is the 1000 to year cycle the,

the roman warren period 2000 years ago. then then the dark ages, which was a cold period and a miserable period in the, in around $580.00. then $1080.00 came the emit evil one period which was even warmer than now in some places. and, and then it went into another cold period called a little ice age peaking around 1680. and since then for the last 400 years or so, it has been warming slightly one degree celsius. it's not, it's absolutely not even significant. the level of warming that has occurred, the earth was so much warmer than this prior to this ice ice age where he and, and that is the great irony, they're saying it's a climate to emergency of heat. when 10 times as many people die from cold as die from heat, even in asia and africa in the, in the warmer countries, more people die from cold and from heat. those stats are irrefutable. it's easy to

find them. and it's a fact. we are in fact a tropical species that we're not like polar bears, which are indeed a polar species that evolve because the ice came and they, the polar bear is a descendant of the year asian brown bear, which we call grizzly bears. they came here from the old world when you could walk across the bearing land bridge during the glaciation. and so the polar bear is actually would not exist if it weren't for climate change because it didn't exist before the earth went into the ice age 2 and a half 1000000 years ago. and probably about a 1000000 and a half years ago. the bears were able to get on the ice and hunt seals and eventually evolved into what we have to do called the polar bear, which is half half again as big as the brown bear if you it descended from. because they have to pull a $300.00 pound seal out of a hole in the ice. so they needed to be stronger to be more efficient. and they turned white because of the ice being

a camera flies. and their digestive system is geared more to a carnivorous diet, whereas the verizon land have a lot of plants matter in their diet. so that, that's, it is kind of ironic that if it weren't for climate change, there would be no polar bears. and yet they're saying that climate change is a threat to the existence of polar bears and show a picture of one swimming in the water as if it doesn't know where it's going. their nickname is, see there's, and they know when they jump in the water where they're going, they know it just jumped in and go off to be drowned or whatever like they make out . and then they show a really old, there in the summer when there's no snow on the ground. so it looks like the arctic ice is gone, which it does on the islands up there in the summer. and it's dragging as high and see because it's so old, it's probably lost all his teeth. and polar bears don't. there's no old folks homes for polar bears. they die in the wild and. and when you take a picture of one,

like national geographic did and then put underneath, this is the face of climate change. as if climate change caused the bear to get ahold, you know, is it, it's just goes way too far. and a pretty well all the publications are in the world except for a few have bought into this sensationalism about the climate. when in fact, there is no crisis about the climate, hurricanes have been with us forever when the earth warms, actually hurricanes diminish. because when the earth warms as it was millions of years ago, the polls are much warmer, but the equator stays about the same. and back to us being a tropical species, we came from the equator. we came out of africa only because we had fire shelter, enclosing we could not live in most of the world. if we didn't have those things, we would die of the cold very quickly, like the 1st winter coming on. if we went, if we went out of africa without those necessities. and so they, you know,

the control of fire, of course, was, i guess you could mark that as the beginning of human civilization when apes turned into people and, and it went on from there to inventing all kinds of tools and etc. but just look at us today, 8000000000 people are actually able to survive with way fewer in poverty. then we're when there was only 4000000000 people or 2000000000 people. and now they're telling us we have to give up our main energy source. fossil fuels, in order to save the world from climate disaster. this is the stupidest decision that has been made by the high level people in our, our society and our politics. the stupidest decision that has ever been made in human history. other than going into world wars and is this, this could be even worse than a world war. if we were actually to stop using more than 80 percent of the energy

we use to keep ourselves alive every day. how much of this is happening because of man's actions versus the natural progression? well, we have had a fixed on the environment, of course, we've turned forest into fields to grow food. we've made cities, but in fact the cities don't even cover 3 percent of the land. and the land is only about 25 percent of the surface of the years. there's no cities in the oceans. so the, the, the, the, the urban areas of this world don't cover very much at all. and i don't understand why people don't just look out the window when they're flying across the country and see how much of it is green and beautiful and productive. it's not as if we've turned it into a death, a dead landscape or anything. i'm a mine. yes. a very tiny fraction of the earth is, is affected by mines. and then when they finish with them, now they re vegetate them and same with the oil sands in canada. they show these

pictures of the earth being dug up, which are not very pretty. but all of those areas are re reclaimed with native vegetation and trees. and just look, looks like nothing's ever happened there, and it's a blink in the eye of history to have that place being opened up for a short period of time while you take the minerals or the oil or whatever it is you need. very interesting. thank you, patrick, please stick around because after the break, we're going to look at the motivation behind the climate change. this area, the release of russian states never is as tight as i'm one of the most sense community . most all sense and up the must be the one else holes. question about this,

even though we will then in the european union, the kremlin, the machine, the state on process routing and supports the r t spoke neck. even our video agency, roughly all the band on youtube, the question did you say they replaced the toner? the energy, the section exists as you get to the world.

the sense world war 2, united states has fostered extremist and t russian prejudices and hatreds among the ukrainian. the asked for in, at least in canada, united states and countries in eastern europe, probably everywhere. and it doesn't matter what these groups say or do they will support them if it is the groups are causing hatred and chaos within the target country, joe again might done choose to consecrate dell instead of do well as low as one of the socialist please. the potatoes is interest if people

are familiar, familiar with each other, ca uses anyone at anything if there's a religion the we are back with our guest, patrick, more ecologist. environmental is founding member of greenpeace. patrick, who is profiting off of this hundreds of organizations. i've, maybe it's thousands of organizations are profiting from this fear. people are giving them money in order to save them from the climate catastrophe. and then you have the, the interesting fact that the 2 largest assemblages of private jets in the world are at the world economic forum in dave, us. and that the inter governmental panel on climate change meeting,

which happens in different capitals around the world. each year was born. they are the ones who have the all the private jets because they're, they're, they're the wealthiest people in the world. and they are taking advantage of this. and, and some of the hare brained schemes that come out at bill gates just gave $6000000.00 to an organization which their approach project is to cut all the trees down in 10000 square miles that 70000000 acres of forest and buried the trees in the ground, so the carbon can go back into the atmosphere when the trees decompose. instead of using it for firewood or buildings or paper, they're going to buried all all these trees in the ground. and i guess eventually they'll turn into coal in a 1000000 years or 2, and then they won't be allowed to dig them out and use them for fuel because we wouldn't want that carbon dioxide getting into your. i'll tell you one thing to

remember. anybody who calls c o 2 carbon should immediately be dismissed. scientists do not call things that they aren't. carbon is a different thing. carbon is graphite. carbon is so it. carbon has a lot of forms just as an atom. an element. lucky balls is another one. we invented them at named after buckminster fuller. it's an amazing lattice work of carbon because carbon has 4 bonds on it, and so it can end it and it can is combined with nearly every other adam in the world. that's why it is the center of life. because life has a lot of very complex compounds in it. and carbon is able to be part of all of them . whether it's the proteins or the fats, or the sugars or, you know, they're, they're not part of bone as far as i know, but they're part of all the fleshy parts of us is made of carbon. and so people who

call c o 2 carbon should be dismissed immediately because there are they are distorting the the use of language. if you're going to be talking about science, they call us carbon change or climate change deniers and carbon deniers. and we don't deny anything, we just know certain things are true and, and others things are not. and what were there it is. again, i start to repeat. there is no evidence in the long term history of the earth. that c o 2 is a major player in the temperature of the years, climate, none, whatsoever. it is just a made up thing. the reason i titled my book fake and visible catastrophes and threats of doom. and that i queen the term the secands visible catastrophes because almost everything that is used as

a scare story is something invisible. carbon dioxide is clearly invisible. no one can see what it's doing. no one can feel what it's doing. the same thing for radiation, they use it as, as a bogeyman, when in fact there's over a 100 nuclear plants in north america and nobody's ever been hurt by them. never mind killed the only the last people that were killed by nuclear plant were in charitable, which was a stupid designed nuclear plant. it blew up. no other plants has ever blown up like that. and if, unfortunately in focus stream it, they allowed the hydrogen gas to explode in the containment structures that could easily have been breached and let it out. so it didn't do that one after another. they let that happen, that that was a, i wouldn't call it a comedy of errors, a tragedy of errors, and they didn't need to happen. there were so many things wrong with how fukushima

was designed and how badly they handled the accident. still no one was killed in that accident by radiation. 2 people were killed by this, so now me when it came to shore an hour after the earthquake and 20000 people died just from the sioux. now me itself. never mind any radiation. i mean, they made it seem as though fukushima was more important than the 20000 people being washed into the sea. so, uh that, but that's because it's invisible. my favorite one is g hmos. what is in g m o's that is bad? what's its name? apparently it doesn't have a name, therefore it doesn't exist. it's just a made up thing. there's nothing that in html is in any scientist who is understanding biology knows that to be true, but they still carry on is if there is something bad going to happen to you if you eat a genetically modified food and even the term genetically modified is misused we are

all genetically modified, not none of us look exactly like our parents. we are half half and half our pay our mother and father. so we are, we are a modification of the original genetics. it was in either one of them. and it, it, it's very hard to be a scientist these days. and but the tide as you have to, if you know what's true as the founder of green piece, you obviously care about the earth. so it is blaming climate change, hurt the conservation movement. very much so if indeed they took away all the fossil fuels, we would ravage this planet pretty badly. just try and stay alive. and you know, the reason i left green peace was very clear. all the campaigns we did while i was there, i agreed with. except i was wrong about nuclear energy back then. so many

of us got caught up in that idea that radiation was going to harm everybody. it took me quite a while to realize that nuclear energy should not be lumped in with nuclear weapons . it should be lumped in with nuclear medicine as a beneficial use of nuclear technology. but beyond that, it came a time when i was the only international director of green piece of the 6 of us that had any formal science education. the rest were activists and politics and all of that. and they decided the green p should started a campaign to ban chlorine world wide, because chlorine is very toxic, this is part of d d t. it's part of p. c b's. it's part part of all kinds of chlorinated hydrocarbons. but it's also the most important element for

protecting public health by putting it into our drinking water and preventing color and other waterborne diseases. it's also so that 75 percent of our medicines are made with chlorine chemistry and 25 percent of them have chlorine in them. if you look at them, your flu and cold medications, you'll see a little cl after some of the compounds in there. and in addition, table salt, sodium chloride is any central nutrient. you could kill yourself if you put a cup of it in your stomach, you'd be hydrate and die. and that's what we toxicity of the main mantra in toxicity is the poison is in the dose. many elements and compounds are essential at low doses. don't hurt you much if you take too much more of it, but eventually will kill you. and chlorine is one of those. and so i just said you guys,

you got to be slightly more nuanced about this because chlorine is one of the most important elements for life as well as being something that can kill you if you breathe it in as an element like the germans used it in world war one as a weapon and you know, you can use a gun for hunting or for murder. uh so it, it, it's just ridiculous. i said, you guys we, i can't be here if you're going to be against corey. and that was the way it worked . i just wrote a nice letter and said see you later. thank you. at patrick moore, ecologists environmental est founding member of green peace. there is no doubt the climate is changing, but how much of that is based on the actions of mankind, or just an agent planet? maybe i would have a better time respecting the politicians and scientist if they're life reflected their own sermons. i've got now here's,

and this has been your 360 view of the news affecting you. thanks for watching the in 1884, the german empire began its colonial invasion intern, and maybe from the very start. berlin encouraged, the white calling is to settle in south west africa and take away the best land from the local drive. the germans were actively draining natural resources and using the local population as a cheap labor source. this was causing major protests and led to rebuild your in 19 o 4, they hear arrow, and nama drives rebuild against the german colonial rule. kaiser wilhelm the 2nd

was fully determined and ordered to suppress the rebellion with the most severe antique against the inhabitants of nan. maybe a germany through is 15000 well equipped army all around the country. concentration camps were built in humane medical experiments over citizens were conducted within the period of 4 years. the german scaled up to 60000 people, among which there were 80 percent of the here railroad tried and 50 percent of the number dr. the events in south west africa are called the 1st genocide of the 20th century and not without reason. hard compared to the holocaust just 2 decades later after the massacre in nam may be a hitler's the solve unit put on the same brown colonial uniform which puts the world into the chasm of the 2nd world war. the take

a fresh look around his life. kaleidoscopic isn't just a shifted reality distortion by power to division with no real live indians. fixtures, design to simplify will confuse who really wants a better wills. and is it just because it shows you frustrated images presented as fast? can you see through their illusion going underground can owens the mania has run its course interest in the proxy war in russia is fading. calves, one type of color offensive is a bus which 1st and rumor suggests there are those in the west to believe the time is coming to pull the plug down. zelinski fits was always inevitable. the,

the grid is really false, is saying they are now fighting in the very cause of gauze to see the future of the impacts of the blinds in the 5 minutes. have benjamin netanyahu claimed we would retain control security definitely off to the world i think is definitely period will have the overall security responsibility because we've seen what happens when we don't have a rigorous process in place for evaluating whether something constitute as genocide or not. that is not a term that we have assessed pertains to this current conflict. well, i think the said that sees no sign of just 5 violation of international law by the