that technology should work for people. a robot must obey the orders given by human beings accept. we're so charters at conflict with the 1st law show your mind, anticipation. we should be very careful about our personal intelligence. the point obviously is to place a truck rather than to the various jobs. i mean with artificial intelligence, we have somebody in the team and the most protects this phone existence was on the right focus. right. is still no we, we but it's a shot record is missing. i noticed that you should be, you know, when you, if you have somebody really aggressive are swap of beach and control them. so pretty good. last time you, it's showing up. i just said he is going to talk a little she speak to at least somebody called us from us,

which is kind of nice with them for pretty to so that would ensure it's good for us to see on the do you feel like i have any way she wouldn't have got the new speed if i leave it somewhere topple. but i think i've got to let you know refresher those items the to saw. yes or no? not. i'm normally at the are you leaving to own coley, jake? uh, the uh, on the,

on the question. the 2023 could be deemed the year of the blame game as it seems. no one wants to take responsibility for a problem from the economy to food shortages,

to the rise in mental health illnesses, to relationship troubles. the latest target for the was of the world is the world itself. i'm sky, know he was in on of this edition of 360 view, we're going to look at the validity of the climate change blame game. let's get started. the, remember when everything caused cancer? well now climate change causes everything. people are blaming natural disasters. the conflict and ukraine divorce and even a rise in domestic abuse on climate change. you know who isn't getting the blame the big corporations, who dep, millions of tons of waste into our oceans and landfills every year, killing fish and sending toxic chemicals into our land and waterways. or maybe

a climate change isn't the problem is the pollution of the world we live in with not just actual toxic waste, but the secular world view eating its way into our politics, schools, businesses, and even home from governments are what caused a warren ukraine. the rise and social media with too many options, the inability to commit to monogamy. and this illusion of the sacred bond of marriage is what is actually causing divorce. gritty power companies are sparking mass of wild buyers and equipped idiots and the desert, causing the burning man fiasco excuse of climate change. simply is being used to divert power, torture and governments all to gain control of how you commute to work. when you hit your home and yes, even click on yourself. but what is the actual science behind climate change? and joining me now to discuss whether there is any validity to the blame it. climate change game is patrick,

more ecologist and environmental list. founding member of greenpeace. thank you for joining us, patrick. patrick, i want to start off. do you think climate change has become a scape goat for the various challenges facing society today? well, i'm not sure about scape goat, but it certainly has become a way of feeling people full of terror and scaring them half to death, and therefore being much more pliant in and being the people in charge. i think it's being used as a weapon. uh there's, there's no doubt at all that gets a complete false fluid uh that there is a climate emergency or climate crisis of any kind. the weather has been happening since the world began. that was 4600000000 years ago. and it was much more extreme in many times in the past, it was only 20000 years ago when the entire country of canada in half of rusher recovered the sheet of ice more than a mile sick. and then that that melted partly were still in the place to see an ice

age. that's another ridiculous assertion that is getting too hot, when in fact this is one of the coldest periods in the history of the earth. that is why there are these huge ice sheets on the arctic count antarctica and they are not going away any time soon. they keep, you know, at al gore predicted they'd be gone already. they're not, they're still there. and for us in the, in the, in the, in the winter, the arctic ocean, if there isn't one square inch, if that isn't frozen over, they always show you the summer ice when it shrinks back from the russian from north north america. to cover about half the arctic ocean, but then every winter it covers the entire arctic ocean. and the other factor is that it is, is so important is that there is no historical evidence that c, o 2 is a main driver of temperature at and not even in the slightest. it's been out of sync with temperature for most of the history of yours. and it happens to be that

we're in a slight warming period now. and we started replenishing the atmosphere with c o 2, which had come down to a level lower than it ever had been in the history of the earth. that's 4600000000 years 20000 years ago. in the peak of the most recent lacey ation in this place to seeing ice age c o 2 saying to $180.00 parts per 1000000, which is only 30 parts per 1000000 above. when plants start to die, we are replenishing the c o 2. that life took out of the atmosphere in the oceans over the last 3000000000 years. most of it in the last half 1000000000 years. when sea creatures learn to make shells from calcium carbonate. although shelves up them to end up on the bottom of the ocean, turning into limestone where the white list of dover, which are the skeletons of kaka listed for us, which are a microscopic fatal plankton plant at the base of the food chain in the c. and

there, there are 100000000000000000 tons of carbon locked up in carbonaceous rocks, all of which is of life origin, all of which was sucked out of the ocean. and to some extent, the atmosphere, the atmosphere, the for us turned at the coal. so that was atmosphere at c o 2 that ended up buried in the ground forever until we came along. so in fact, we are the salvation of life in that we are replenishing the c o 2. that life inadvertently hit mean they didn't do it on the plankton weren't thinking. let's take to all the c o 2 out of the water, but that's what happened because they invented a way to make armor plating for themselves. if you think of a clam, imagine how easy it would be for a predator to get a clam. if it didn't have that shell on it, the shelves are like, harm are on a night. and so there's many, many, many species figured out how to do that. and that's why there's a 100000000000000000 tons of carbon in the form of carbonaceous rocks, limestone,

marble and shock are all of life origin. and they all contain carbon that came from carbon dioxide. and it's, i could go on forever about the subject, but i'll leave it there. but that is the truth. is there a difference between climate change and global warming? as they are often confused, it seems, well they, they, they changed it to climate change when it stopped warming for about 20 years back in the ninety's. and so then they said, well, all of a sudden now a change to cooling was, was called climate change. you can call it global warming because it was cooling. so it goes in cycles on cycles, on cycles. the most interesting one in modern times is the 1000 to year cycle the, the roman warren period 2000 years ago. then then the, the dark ages, which was a cold period and a miserable period in the, in around $580.00. then $1080.00 came the emit evil one period which was

even warmer than now in some places. and, and then it went into another cold period called a little ice age peaking around 1680. and since then for the last 400 years or so, it has been warming slightly one degree celsius. it's not, it's absolutely not even significant. the level of warming that has occurred, the earth was so much warmer than this prior to this ice ice age where he and, and that is the great irony, they're saying it's a climate to emergency of heat when 10 times as many people die from cold, as die from heat, even in asia and africa in the, in the warmer countries, more people die from cold and from heat. those stats are irrefutable. it's easy to find them. and it's a fact. we are in fact a tropical species that we're not like polar bears, which are indeed

a polar species that evolve because the ice came and they, the polar bear is a descendant of the year asian brown bear, which we call grizzly bears. they came here from the old world when you could walk across the burying land bridge during the glassy agents. and so the polar bear is actually would not exist if it weren't for climate change because it didn't exist before the earth went into the ice age 2 and a half 1000000 years ago. and probably about a 1000000 and a half years ago. the bears were able to get on the ice and hunt seals and eventually evolved into what we have to do called the polar bear, which is half half again as big as the brown bear if you it descended from. because they have to pull a $300.00 pound seal out of a hole in the ice. so they needed to be stronger to be more efficient. and they turned white because of the ice being a camera flies. and their digestive system is geared more to a carnivorous diet,

whereas the, there is on land have a lot of plants matter in their diet. so that, that's, it is kind of ironic that if it weren't for climate change, there would be no polar bears. and yet they're saying that climate change is a threat to the existence of polar bears and show a picture of one swimming in the water as if it doesn't know where it's going. their nickname is, see there's, and they know when they jump in the water where they're going, they know it just jump in and go off to be drowned or whatever like they make out. and then they show a really old, they're in the summer when there's no snow on the ground. so it looks like the arctic ice is gone, which it does on the islands up there in the summer. and it's dragging its hind feet because it's so old. it's probably lost all his teeth, and polar bears don't. there's no old folks homes for polar bears. they die in the wild. and when you take a picture of one, like national geographic did and then put underneath, this is the face of climate change. as if climate change caused the bear to get

ahold, it was it, it, it's just goes way too far and up pretty well. all the publications are in the world except for a few have bought into this sensationalism about the climate. when in fact, there is no crisis about the climate, hurricanes have been with us forever when the earth warms, actually hurricanes diminish. because when the earth warms, as it was millions of years ago, the poles are much warmer, but the equator stays about the same. and back to us being tropical species, we came from the equator. we came out of africa only because we had fire shelter and closing. we could not live in most of the world if we didn't have those things . we would die of the cold very quickly, like the 1st winter coming on. if we went, if we went out of africa without those necessities. and so the, you know, the control of fire, of course, was, i guess you could mark that as the beginning of human civilization when apes turned

into people and, and it went on from there to inventing all kinds of tools and etc. but just look at us today, 8000000000 people are actually able to survive with way fewer in poverty than were when there was only 4000000000 people or 2000000000 people. and now they're telling us we have to give up our main energy source. fossil fuels, in order to save the world from climate disaster. this is the stupidest decision that has been made by the high level people in our, our society and our politics. the stupidest decision that has ever been made in human history. other than going into world wars and these, this, this could be even worse than a world war. if we were actually to stop using more than 80 percent of the energy we use to keep ourselves alive every day. how much of this is happening because of man's actions versus the natural progression?

well, we have had a fixed on the environment, of course, we've turned forest into fields to grow food. we've made cities, but in fact the cities don't even cover 3 percent of the land. and the land is only about 25 percent of the surface of the years. there's no cities in the oceans. so the, the, the, the, the urban areas of this world don't cover very much at all. and i don't understand why people don't just look out the window when they're flying across the country and see how much of it is green and beautiful and productive. and it's not as if we've turned it into a death, a dead landscape or anything. i'm a mine. yes. a very tiny fraction of the earth is, is affected by mines. and when they finish wisdom, now they re vegetate them and same with the oil sands in canada. they show these pictures of the earth being dug up, which are not very pretty. but all of those areas are re reclaimed with native

vegetation and trees and just look, looks like nothing's ever happened there. and it's a blink in the eye of history to have that place being opened up for a short period of time. while you take the minerals or the oil or whatever it is, you need. very interesting. thank you, patrick, please stick around. because after the break, we're going to look at the motivation behind the climate change this area. the society of the account is going to be that it was a fine you that there was a series of organizations on the, on the western ukrainian side, issues about their own strength illusions about straight for the russian opponents . basically the, you know, the take their to rush or, and new crime was adored, i just have to be checked in and the whole structure would come, come some come into the looseness. i've been shopped with the

the, the, [000:00:00;00] the right now in the acreage where he lives to alaska. for fathers born and 1917,

his 1st wife, rest of the course of extra service. we have people from all over the world or a 100 percent personal village. vanya is one, your service solution for russia. did you say, what was the, that's what i'm trying to explain to show that this product accept. uh, is this the regular destiny of what can i see? what's, what's the zip on we have to strong connection in a church that weren't there spiritual taking to us here. that's where

the we are back with our guest. patrick mor ecologist environmental is founding member of greenpeace. patrick, who is profiting off of this hundreds of organizations like maybe it's thousands of organizations are profiting from this fear. people are giving them money in order to save them from the climate catastrophe. and then you have the, the interesting fact that the 2 largest assemblages of private jets in the world are at the world economic forum in dave, us. and that the inter governmental panel on climate change meeting, which happens in different capitals around the world. each year was and they're the ones who have the all the private jets because they're, they're, they're the wealthiest people in the world. and they are taking advantage of this. and,

and some of the hare brained schemes that come out at bill gates just gave $6000000.00 to an organization which their approach project is to cut all the trees down in 10000 square miles that 70000000 acres of forest and buried the trees in the ground, so the carbon can go back into the atmosphere when the trees decompose. instead of using it for firewood or buildings or paper, they're going to buried all all these trees in the ground. and i guess eventually they'll turn into coal in a 1000000 years or 2, and then they won't be allowed to dig them out and use them for fuel because we wouldn't want that carbon dioxide getting into your i'll tell you one thing to remember. anybody who calls c o 2 carbon should immediately be dismissed. scientists do not call things that they aren't. carbon is

a different thing. carbon is graphite. carbon is so it. carbon has a lot of forms just as an atom. an element. lucky balls is another one. we invented them at named after buckminster fuller. it's an amazing lattice work of carbon cuz carbon has 4 bonds on it, and so it can end it and it can is combined with nearly every other adam in the world. that's why it is the center of life. because life has a lot of very complex compounds in it, and carbon is able to be part of all of them. but whether it's the proteins or the fats, or the sugars or, you know that they're not part of bone as far as i know, but they're part of all the fleshy parts of us is made of carbon. and so people who call c o 2 carbon should be dismissed immediately because there are they are distorting the the use of language. if you're going to be talking about science,

they call us carbon change or climate change deniers and carbon deniers. and we don't deny anything, we just know certain things are true and, and others things are not. and what were there it is. again, i start to repeat. there is no evidence in the long term history of the earth. that c o 2 is a major player in the temperature of the years, climate, none whatsoever. it is just a made up thing. the reason i titled my book fake invisible catastrophes and threats of doom. and that i queen the term the fake invisible catastrophes. because almost everything that is used as a scare story is something invisible. carbon dioxide is clearly invisible. no one can see what it's doing. no one can feel what it's doing. the same thing for radiation, they use it as, as a bogeyman. when in fact, there's over

a 100 nuclear plants in north america, and nobody's ever been hurt by them. never mind killed the only the last people that were killed by a nuclear plant were in charitable, which was a stupid designed nuclear plant. it blew up. no other plants has ever blown up like that. and if, unfortunately in focus stream it, they allow the hydrogen gas to explode in the containment structures that could easily have been breached and let it out. so it didn't do that, that one after another, they let that happen. that was, that was it. i wouldn't call it a comedy of errors, a tragedy of errors. and they didn't need to happen. there were so many things wrong with how focus shame it was designed and how badly they handled the accident . still no one was killed in that accident by radiation. 2 people were killed by this anatomy when it came to shore. an hour after the earthquake and $20000.00

people died just from the sioux. now, me itself. never mind any radiation, i mean, they made it seem as though fukushima was more important than the 20000 people being washed into the sea. so that, but that's because it's invisible. my favorite one is g hmos. what is in g m o's that is bad? what's its name? apparently it doesn't have a name. therefore it doesn't exist. it's just a made up thing. there's nothing bad in html is, and any scientist who is understanding biology knows that to be true. but they still carry on is if there is something bad going to happen to you, if you eat a genetically modified food and even the term genetically modified is misused. we're all genetically modified. none of us look exactly like our parents. we are half, half and half our pick our mother and father. so we are, we are

a modification of the original genetics that was in either one of them. and it, it, it's very hard to be a scientist these days. and but the tide as you have to, if you know what's true as the founder of green peace, you obviously care about the earth. so it is blaming climate change. hurt the conservation movement. very much so. uh, if indeed they took away all the fossil fuels, we would ravage this planet pretty badly. just try and stay alive. and, you know, the reason i left green piece was very clear. all the campaigns we did while i was there, i agreed with. except i was wrong about nuclear energy back then. so many of us got caught up in that idea that radiation was going to harm everybody. it took me quite a while to realize that nuclear energy should not be lumped in with nuclear weapons

. it should be lumped in with nuclear medicine as a beneficial use of nuclear technology. but beyond that, it came a time when i was the only international director of green piece of the 6 of us that had any formal science education. the rest were activists and politics and all of that. and they decided the green p should start a campaign to ban chlorine world wide. because chlorine is very toxic, it's part of d d t, it's part of p. c. b's. it's part part of all kinds of chlorinated hydrocarbons, but it's also the most important element for protecting public health by putting it into our drinking water and preventing color and other waterborne diseases. it's also so that 75 percent of our medicines are made with chlorine chemistry and 25 percent of them have chlorine in them. if you look at the,

your flu and cold medications, you'll see a little cl after some of the compounds in there. and in addition, table salt, sodium chloride is in the central nutrient. you could kill yourself if you put a cup of it in your stomach, you dehydrate and die. and that's the way toxicity of the main mantra in toxicity is the poison is in the dose. many elements and compounds are essential at low doses. don't hurt you much if you take too much more of it, but eventually will kill you. and chlorine is one of those. and so i just said you guys, you got to be slightly more nuanced about this because chlorine is one of the most important elements for life as well as being something that can kill you if you breathe it in as an element like the germans used it in world war one as

a weapon and you know, you can use a gun for hunting or for a murder. so it, it, it's just ridiculous. i said you guys we, i can't be here if you're going to be against corey. and that was the way it worked . i just wrote a nice letter and said see you later. thank you, patrick, more ecologists, environmental. as founding member of green piece. there is no doubt the climate is changing, but how much of that is based on the actions of mankind, or just an agent planet? maybe i would have a better time respecting the politicians and scientist if they're life reflected their own sermons. i've got now, here's, and this has been your 360 view of the news affecting you. thanks for watching the

professional united states cause the real stir when speaking to congress, joe biden brought up the possibility of american troops fighting russian troops. this is the state of the fail due crane project facing failure on all fronts. biden's only option is to expand the complex really, the for the both of the letters says that the move found the single was a because all the them yeah. record of one of the stuff out for you. yes, i have a life force. right? so what kind of this if i started with us because those exist to the 5 units, but on us and model is fine. much it took me on the before should be more with

the the bodies really drilling a tax of the homeless office in david lebanon, killing the deputy director of the organizations political department and go, the schools of civilians are killed in the last 24 hours as is where the missiles bring down all the only central i'm southern areas, policy and dest, totaling the girl hasn't supposed $22000.00 defense. and that the says that school does have a web, the production warehouse between 5 japanese coast guard playing group that was all killed in an inclusion with an ad

lineup to choose another apple 379 passengers on board with successfully evacuated