tv The 360 View RT January 9, 2024 3:30pm-4:01pm EST
3:30 pm
these documents come to lights. right, that's what i do for now, but up next i'll be back in 30 minutes with much more news by the over 44000 hours of security footage, the united states capital on january 6th, 2021 has yet to be released, but it's not the democrats, this time of fighting the footage from being made public. i'm scanning now hughes. and on to this episode of $360.00 view, we're going to look at the latest developments being made public regarding the events who was involved on the attack on capitol hill. and what impact this will
3:31 pm
have a future protest in the united states? let's get started. the 2 months after the defeat of president trump and just days before president biden was to be a not created americans gathered in washington dc to protest what they thought was the election, douglas voter irregularities and stolen by the radical left in the crack. now the hope was you persuade congress and then vice president my pen to not certified the electoral college results. however, when a fraction of the rally, attendees on the washington mall, march to capitol hill and clashed with capitol hill, police, a legal, peaceful protest involved into an angry mon. only one person died on january 6th, and there was an unarmed protest her and veteran. this is where the facts of the day even 2 years later and start to be challenged as january 6 was quickly turned
3:32 pm
into a popular weapon, used by democrats, the last 3 years to demonize. anything related to donald j. trump. and the support of our president is now basically a case of in washington dc, alleging he was actually responsible for assigning the violence. prosecutor jack smith is attempting to subpoena anyone who even like a trump tweet before january 6th. now this isn't pure and republican lawmakers like louisiana representative clay higgins. let me say regard jack smith and his request for now. no other list of american citizens on this i'm a legit, legitimate investigative effort. i'm considered a bad, your honor to be on another one of jackson missile is. so i just say that is is days are numbered, but newly elected speaker of the house. mike johnson is making good on his campaign promise to release the videotapes. you know,
3:33 pm
congress is posting more than 44000 hours of security for footage taking during the january 6 riot on a new public website over the next several months. now the videos will blur the faces of private citizens all to ensure no one is targeted for retaliation of any kind. roughly 5 percent of the video footage will not be posted due to sensitive security information related to the building architecture. and information continues to be revealed about the day, mainly through the release of security footage and personal videos doubted being shed on whether this protest which began as peaceful was instigated to become violent. the release of the january 6 tapes, as in a critical and important exercise, we want transparency, we should demand that the american people do. we trust house republicans trust the american people to draw their own conclusions. we should not, they should not be dictated by some narrative and accept that as fact. so they can review the tapes themselves. let's discuss the latest about january 6th and the
3:34 pm
impact is happening on the 2024 election. was our panel. the go as to robert patello and bullock abdul and larry ward, who was the chair of the constitutional rights pack. thank you gentlemen, for joining me on this. and so i'm actually going to start with our democrats on the panel. robert, should democrats continue to make january 6, one of their main talking points against donald trump and the support isn't working for the party? i think so, and i think more importantly, we have to ensure something like january it's, it's never happens again that if we start normalizing this and simply say, well, it was a peaceful protest. the got a little bit out of hand and that so you know, there was a guy in the viking had on the senate floor reading through ted cruz of paper work . well then that means everyone gets to do that whenever there is a contest to the election. and i challenge people to say that that was thousands of muslim americans breaking into the capital and reading the crown on the senate floor. what will you be saying? well, just a pre people protested with a wry or that would black lives matter. a storm in a capital are flying a red,
3:35 pm
black and green flag, the same with they had the confederate flag parading through the capital that we signed that will just simply a peaceful protests going arrive. and we do not set a president. now this is not how america settled to let from then we will no longer have we let him to and america. so i'm all for getting to the bottom of things. i think many of us were disappointed and became where it sits, commission because it focused so much on president trump. didn't focus on the role of law enforcement because we saw the video for people who were moving barricades and letting people in with all the video to people. so you'll know that the bad habit doors were open out there and said they're there. you might be the 1st time a credit for it actually admitted that the, particularly in the, in the bank. so they've been particularly don't let people, we will say there's no way you just ran in. there are probably help of people who are inside president trump said before the election, we have the we have law enforcement behind. we have the bike roof, we have the truck or if we have the military behind it, we got all the tough guys. and then on january 5th, we thought exactly that, so the investigation needs to be exactly how deep that rock goes and how deep the
3:36 pm
penetration wants to allow this to happen. because the, there's no waiting for anyone to credit. we believe that people just walked into the capital because they broke a window and stormed in there. and, well, i think the american people still want to know exactly what happened on that day. okay. so you at least show him at that side of it. larry ward present candidate the backroom remo swami. he brought out a recent interview, how the foot it shows the capital place, opening the doors. but here was a new one that's come out and unless you were close to people that were there that day and they told you it, we know know they were shooting rubber bullets and tear gas into the crowd. does this change the perception of those who were part of january 6? as the footage we've seen was the reaction of course i look, we honestly another january 6 because what it was was a peaceful protest. there's no question in my mind. that's what it was. it was, it wasn't protested and look, let's you can't look at january 6, it it back, you might or, you know, they were definitely voting like a regular already. i believe the election was stolen. a lot of americans believe
3:37 pm
the election was stolen by the fact one of the highest percentage of people that believe you liked into solar. are democrats in the inner cities? i did, i ran a poll on it, and it was one of the highest percentage of people because they see elections being stolen all the time in these inner city. so of course they believe the election was stolen a 2020, but you, you looked at what happened and, and then was not just a, it was not just january 6, it was all of the cases that we brought with the judges the case out for no apparent reason, there is no way i judge can say there was no electric fraud. there is no way that bill bark and say after 2 days of investigating what to do with investigators saying that there was no election fraud. there is no way that could happen that they close the case. there was so and then we had 2 other protests to other stop. this deal breakdown when we brought millions of people very peacefully to dc and said stop this deal. we brought this pre car. we problem, they the, to stop the steel rallies with a 1000000 people who say patent us on the head and said, nice protest. now now we're going to do what we want and,
3:38 pm
and that's why january 6 happened. there was a lot of friends up frustration about the big getting ignored get. i mean, i mean, one of the most important elections that are lifetime, you know, stolen in the minds of all of those protesters and just being ignored and being pacified to be told. you don't know what you're talking about when we didn't know what we were talking about. so look, did we go there? angry. yeah, we went there. angry. it was. there was a lot of pagger, but yes, for sure. i was there on the ground. i jumped on the gas, they, they threw rubber bullets, they threw dir. yeah. c it was, it was per bolt by the capital police. there was no question in my my i was, i saw people came out immediately and said they just started fired canisters at us . and, and it was, it was a, a result in since they took a peaceful protest. they riled up the crowd. they've got the crowd even angrier than they were. and then they left them in the capital so that they could take all
3:39 pm
the video and photo and a rush. you know, and there i can say this is, but i have the arrow to and this in, this goes to robert's point. who did this, who, you know, robert says obviously law enforcement needs to be investigated how deep the rod is . is it long for the who was the one that was shooting this in to the end of the crowd? who was the one do you think should be held accountable for those actions as we did see them on necessarily the recent past pro palestinian prototypes that have happened on capitol hill? we haven't seen that other approaches we did same on the women's march when they, there were fights that broke out. we saw it in this case. so who is the one that should be held responsible for things like rubber bullets being shot into the crowd . and is this the law enforcement, or do you think there's a higher power involved? i think there's a higher power, but look, there were hundreds of f, b i, agents on, on the ground where they are not quite sure what it figures out. but what's the proof of that? and this is the question of it that keeps getting kind of where i'm going to get to there. but what is the proof that the f b i agents do you believe on the ground there? oh there were, there were definitely undercover agents on the ground in january 6. look,
3:40 pm
you see video of lawn 40 identified law enforcement people, you know, instigating the crowd. you see, of course, you know, the, the, you know, the, the, well going into the capital end of the capital from, from that, that, that guy who kind of was given a slap on the wrist and only because, you know, it was a, became a, i can't remember his name, sorry, sorry about my head, but he became the focus of, of the, the incident. but there's this bit, this 44000 hours video. we can find out exactly exactly what happened. and you can look at that time in terms of when the, when the, the police attack the crowd. and you can look at the, uh, you know, we can get a list of, of all of the f, b i, agents and informants that we're on in the ground. we just have to continue to investigate this. and, and this is important because here's why there has not been another conservative protest of any consequence on capitol hill. and there's lots of things to protest.
3:41 pm
they're not going to go back to the people's house because we're afraid we're going to get arrested. and larry goes added point, and that's the point we're going to talk about. i wanna talk about monique, you're in an interesting position. you live in washington dc. this is your city, you love the city. you also are public and your conservative. you saw the events are january 6th, we have a do you think the truth has been allowed to be out there and why or why not? well, i can say as, as you said, i live here in washington dc. i've been here for about so we weren't there. oh, you did not go down. oh, i did not go there on january 6, but i think i could probably speak for not just washington dc, but interstate. he's all around the country and that the no, we don't believe that the election was stolen. ida, i think we can save that. but on january 6, and i do agree with larry, i actually attended the very 1st rally, which was the millions of like a millions mag a march or something that was in november of 2021. it was absolutely peaceful. there was another rally our week after the election. there was a week after the election. there was another a rally that occurred sometime in dfcs, emberts january 6th,
3:42 pm
was the 3rd rally. so as to the question of why didn't people expose, you know, expect it to be violent because of the 1st 2 were not violent at all. there were security failures all around the board, but i don't think that there was anything deliberate behind it. we know that this is mary mariel bowels are requested on december 30th on our national guard troops to actually deal with things like, you know, traffic violations and controlling traffic. she wanted them on arm because of what happened just that summer, where the net, there was a natural discourse around whether or not the law enforcement was too heavy handed in dealing with the black lives matter. protesters. so she requested on our national guard troops. the question on how did they get inside? it could be easily answered because the house sergeant at arms who controls security of the capital. that is their role. someone had to give a stand down border, meaning the video that we saw of people walking into the capital. i just can't believe that someone didn't say, well,
3:43 pm
we need to just let them come in. if there was no type of contingency plan for an event like that, where if something happens, you don't lock the doors because these weren't all of these doors lock. they were not locked in the doors there. next door, you saw people walking in. so someone said, don't engage with them, don't even lock the doors and i think we need to get to the bottom of that. and i think that's an easily answer question. someone said, stand down. and that's not something that any of us here will be able to answer. okay, we're going to get to this engagement, robert, until you tell him like a bill or award. hold it. let's take a quick break because when we come back, we're going to look at the role, the fbi i played in january 6th. and why this is not much different from what us intelligence agencies have been playing a role in protest and other foreign countries or the,
3:44 pm
there's no end in sight over how you're going to continue to destroy the or is the case for the med, most of the people i tried to go to the gym, but i'm certainly not ready to fight russia. this is also of soon. this is the 3rd world will receive re washing as for so the funder line likes to say, we have the tools while we just start with stability and business deals to living on mac. we have very quick propaganda. you know, a price here in new york. i think we don't know the aftermath any time that you're not allowed to ask questions, you should ask all of the questions. the more questions ask a better. the answer is, will be the release of russian states. never as one of the most sense community best. most all sense and the same
3:45 pm
assistance must be the one else holes. question about this, even though we will then in the european union, the kremlin machine, the state on the russians to day and split the r t smooth neck, even our video agency, roughly all the band on youtube tv services for the question, did you say steven? twist, which is the welcome back on the sky. now hughes and you are watching the 360 view and the central intelligence agency is supposed to collect, evaluate, a disseminate vital information on economic, military, political, scientific, and other developments abroad to protect the national security of the united states
3:46 pm
. however, there has been multiple countries who have accused the c. i a, a play, a significant role in popular pro, test within their own borders. in 2022, around the summit for public intelligence ministry and the intelligence organization of the revolutionary guard issued a joint statement, claiming the c i a had a significant role in the protest following the death of my husband. many the chinese media accuse as the eye of being behind extreme asked by hong kong protesters and 2019 and there's operation, timber sycamore and 2013 is a secret program which eventually led to the syrian civil war. it's an amazing new because back of the 1950s, the c i, it was a part of operation k us and found a cuban exiles who could be used in the campaign against president fidel castro. so did the fbi, i does take a lesson from their fellow intelligence agency and apply it domestically. but why?
3:47 pm
well, let's continue this discussion with our panel. so go analyst probably tell them like ado. larry ward, who was the chair of the constitutional rights patch. i didn't get a chance to get back to robert. you heard from the 1st segment, what they were saying. i love the fact that we have kind of, we have ones that, you know, we can talk about. i think you could separate was the election stolen versus the events of january 6. i think both need to be looked at separately. granted cause and effect. but do you believe the f b i was actually involved in the for january 6th purchase was in inside jobs as the republicans continued to try to talk about. this is where the inside job falls apart. that donald trump was president and he had his own f, b, i, director, and the here on the attorney general. and he was in charge of the f b i at the time and had been so for 4 years. and so the idea that there was an inside job, they've been and just metastasized inside the f b i over the course of 4 years waiting for january 5th to foment itself and then kind of explode upon the world. really doesn't make a lot of sense because of the daunting front would be in certain candidate trying
3:48 pm
to women much and versus being the incumbent. it might make a little bit more sense. but when you have, when you have your own f, b, i your own f, b, i, director your own department of justice and you're the person in charge of the federal government. the idea of that there's a inside job against you kind of falls apart. now what we have said for decades now is that the f, b, i c, i a have been involved in pro, a, involving our co intel program or against african american communities. even during the black lives matter or protest arouse, we have with serious people in black, may have showing dealt with pallets of bricks that just descended upon black communities. and all of a sudden escalated, arrives into a volume arrived. we still don't know who burned down the minneapolis police station. for example, if you look at the comp city in the, in atlanta, we're protest her from afar was auto and canada in california. they showed up and started shooting at law enforcement. so we know that these things do indeed happen to protest within the african american communities at other communities. but this
3:49 pm
conceptualization to donald trump's own f b. i turn the gifts to me, particularly when we have the videos of law enforcement opening against opening doors, giving tours around the capital to these individuals is more like it's an inside job the other way. but i'm interested in hearing the for the, the book i, i'm all for good conspiracy theory. it was all have to line up for book, i believe big foot. i believe you're talking to me under the say, i get that common sense. you lay out your case common sense. why is that something good service often say, just look at comments inside of it, larry, i know you want to interject here. i really want to get some awake real quick, make your response with them. but i do not believe that it was an inside job. i think this was something that actually organically happen. and even if we look at the actual charges, once we get free, i behind dropped the, as you said, since it was under trump, do you believe that the f b i head spin again, has been on trump side from day one? know a little, there is nothing and we've even had the people who were donald trump, a pointed to position some were in the federal government who pin anonymous off. it's talking about what they were doing in the federal government in order to
3:50 pm
actually stop the, you know, dictate, or donald trump from doing things. there were, there were met people within federal government who were working against federal government. a donald trump. we know that as a fact, but as far as the f b, i as involved into this, yes. all around all around the world, the federal government is involved in protests. i'm not, i wouldn't be surprised that they were f, b, i, informant in the protest. but i really think because of the very 1st 2 rallies that were peaceful, there was really no reason for this to be for let's take january 6 then to be the inside job as opposed to the very peaceful previous rallies, which was an extension of what we saw on january 6, so i don't think that it was an inside job and there is no evidence to suggest that it was an inside job. but larry timberlake's plan, a 3rd already been to protest, you basically showed how things were going to run. did you already go in and give them with their already kind of like here's the, here's the schedule. you know what's going to happen if you want to do something as far as go for it? yeah, yeah. well, absolutely. robert, come on the f
3:51 pm
b i was on trump side. i'm sitting here listening to you. i know you don't really believe that the f b, i the say that the guy that did the russia collusion, oaks the same f, b i, the lubbers, the whole, the yard. you can't believe the f b. i was on trump side, particularly after he fired, told me, you know, this is, this is a completely ridiculous statement that be and it was trumps f b i truck trump was an enemy of the f b i n n a quite frankly the f b i c is, it is an enemy of the american people today. and so we have to look at what, what actually happened there. yes, there were f, b, i, informant, it will come out. i have no doubt about it. and, and, you know, the less be, but argument is there is no evidence that keeps a 100 and, and joe by there's plenty of evidence. there's plenty of evidence that there was. yeah, there's plenty of evidence or there was an inside job. it just not has not been adjudicated. we have not had a real trial looking at what actually happened on january 6. the only the only
3:52 pm
thing we had was the least cheney sham january 6th hearing where they didn't have any real republicans called list jamie republican. i, she's not, you know, you, that was the only hearing that we had was one side where they could videos it made it worse than it actually was. so, you know, and, and then literally simply, just for robbery we were part of it. and robert republicans have been in charge of the house for a few years now. they can have their own january 5th tearing the last year or so. instead, they've gone through like a half dozen speakers and they want the impeachment inquiry. they wanted to get to the bottom of it. they have every power in the federal government to be able to do so. they haven't done that. so how is it that we're still claiming there's evidence out there, but then when given the chance, educate that evidence they just decide not to well, 1st of all, they don't, you know, the house does not have the, the power to go through 44000 hours of video, which is why releasing it is the right answer. you release it,
3:53 pm
you'll let the crowd looked. c at it, you pull out the important evidence, you pull out the important each time stamps, particularly when things were like, like you said, capital police were, were drawing gas categories, tapper police, or somebody was stored gas canisters and rubber bullets in the crowd to agitate them. you can look and see that, you know, who is who's actually instigating people saying we go into the capital. we, we do, we do some background checks here at this time. this is not going to be a, this is not going to be adjudicated in this cycle. it's going to be when uh, president trump takes office again and, and actually has us look, we got to get to the bottom of what happened in 2020. and we have to get to the bottom of what happened on january 6th. and that's when maybe the truth will come out. i'm not confident that that'll happen. i'm not confident that they're going to go back and look. but i think it's important to do so, particularly because we have to tell the american people who have been afraid of their government, afraid to voice their opinion at the people's house to come back and. and then you
3:54 pm
have real rights and that you are protected and that the government made a run, this terrible mistake going into the radical direction and rounding of grandma grandma for no apparent reason. well, and that's what i want to end this conversation with is talking about the effects moving forward on it because she's right. you have not seen you saw the march for life. i think you saw gathering a little bit about roe vs wade a few months ago. you really have not seen a large scale, conservative protest, or even a live protest. do you think this has changed? protest in washington d. c. a city that has been made famous throughout history for protest against injustices. robert, i don't think so. i think what people have learned is, you know, don't break into the speaker, but house office and smear free seeds on the wall. they don't steal that term. i think that we can fit, that is to bring to general rules of how peaceful protests, goals have been. people understand that, but what i, what, what we have still sitting within the profile, assuming and marches taking place, whereas got violent. they got violent, but they, they did not try to scan the capital. and i think that like with
3:55 pm
a one take way has been that we are having a protest. even there is comfortable receiving very some level of discourse or internet for a police officer. the people understand what the parameters are, and i think that's been the, the kind of the bar relative and set by designing worth it events. i don't think they have this way that people have to be, i guess the government as the thing is people realize that, well, maybe there's a limit to where this can go very well. you do another protest here on the capital as, yeah, i want to but quite frankly, no one's gonna come. i, i speak to conservatives, you know, prominent conservative and they're like, no, we would not go back, but kept, why wouldn't i risk my freedom? you know, people are big, were, were hunted down like animals and arrested because they were led into the capital and walked around and stayed in the lines of the whole 9 yards. so yeah, they all wouldn't try it or what was not even there. he was not even there, he was arrested and imprisoned. this with this has been the most egregious uh, you know, abuse of power we've ever seen in american history. oh,
3:56 pm
and you know what they said they kept saying it was an art protest. you know what the january 6 uh committees reason for calling and our protest was is because they the, the protesters brought flags with flag poles into the capital. that was, that was the justification because they were know that when people, when he later tell area where the, that's not what we're going to find a bit later. we're going to talk about some agreements, abuses of american history by the government. black folks and native americans would like to check into the chat and give you a couple of things to look at because they've been a lot worse. things will happen on january 5th. they've happened to other communities and bladder. what else is catching up to? what happened? but you can call and tell probably assess nice and sort of to for ice leaders. we leave jailing and political pressure. there's no people in jail from the 1964, only political speak, so i'm glad you guys have joined the chat and seeing what's happening. everybody else. but i don't think you think jane versus the worst thing that happened in this country. well, and i think the difference is that was one day compared to like you said, a move with that. obviously i trust the f atrocity committed to robert, but i appreciate this conversation. obviously it's going to continue until we
3:57 pm
actually get the truth. but who knows if that will actually happen any time soon? thank you for joining me. robert. tell him like a bill and larry ward and there's been no greater event and recent history i believe which has damage the trust and integrity of the united states government. then january 6, politicians and pundents, one to blame it on the people who are involved. however, it is the government and how they handled the events of the day, their involvement and their political web, the web and ization, which is followed and continues to read people's faith and the government. edited video slowly being released to the public. parson hearings which turn into shouting matches, and the ignoring of facts which refused the original claims of the day, only adds to the stress with unclear answers as to whether the f b i was involved. i mean, it's a simple yes or no. and in what capacity, it's no wonder why there is frustration at why the truth cannot be simply stated. i don't agree with anything which happened on january 6, 3, personally,
3:58 pm
i assessed ahead of time there was going to be a high risk of something going wrong. but there were good people who came to washington dc on that day, and all they wanted to do was express their costs additional right to usefully protest. and even though they never took one step towards the capital, their lives for the past 3 years had been lived in fear. that would be false accused and find law enforcement dramatically showing up at their place of work or at their home is completely motivated by politics as to why the full truth about january 6 has not been released. don't be fooled if this is about protecting democracy or security. if this was the true intention, then there would be nothing to hide in all the facts. the footage would be released immediately to justify the position taken by either party. yet here, american cit, waiting for the next negative information to drop all to connect the dots of the day in hopes of creating a clear picture and moving on. and this is
3:59 pm
a tactic which has been used by both democrats and republicans, which somewhat consider to be alarming. unfortunately, i consider to be the standard, the sky, nephews, and this has been in your 362 the, there's many problems in u. s. society. now that they're facing because of the, their model is again, it's not able to fulfill the expectations of people guessing goals in, in, in, in homelessness, us and growth in poverty. this is a lot of traffic ations on the people who say so that they need to find a way to, to vote for, you know, solving their own problems and trying to police the world. the
4:00 pm
to the president of ecuador has declared an internal arm to complex, the resume and the south african nations, due to the unrest bike criminal troops across the country. the israel released as fresh videos of its operations and strikes on gaza 11 on as the us secretary of state business to tell a fee to solidly affirm washington support bank united states of america. all your more all due to the fact that you're spending steadfast with this road and bangladesh elections attracts greater scrutiny this time from the u. s. which has granted the recent tournaments report results as this honest.
12 Views
Uploaded by TV Archive on