or guns to use our military bases, which are very, very close, figuratively stores that are all way from by why that. so what, why do you assess now? is that, um, but they one issue obviously with becoming a proxy wire between china and the united states. and because we are the most proximate neighborhood by why and because of the, um, uh, it got to be met that we have entered into with united states basically mean the water for the philippines as well. all right, archie does comedies while you can get for the details of the stories. we're following. this our more updates just ahead in about 30 minutes. next is direct impact the the color sanchez. i've been doing news now for 30 years of the 2 languages all over the world here in the

united states interviewed for us. presidents, i've also worked for several us major television networks and i believe after all of that, the news to be honest and direct and impactful. that's why we call this direct impact the let's start with this one. earlier this year, the world court declared that the united states violated international law wanted force. the freezing of assets of iranian companies was sending a message. one that was uh, essentially already repeated all over the world. because it's what so many around the world of already been saying that the west and its bags are weaponized being assets like gold, oil, and even savings accounts. it's, it's a bit of a worry,

some trend, no doubt. right? one that has to do with our bags because they're the ones freezing the assets and even closing people's accounts and for whatever the reasons they're doing. so the countries they're doing, so the companies and they're even doing it, the private citizens. let me tell you what i'm talking about here. it's happened to a gentleman his name a lot. next. how roy? right, that's his name. he lives in los angeles. and one day out of the blue, he goes to log into his account with bank of america, right. and he finds out that the account shut down. it's shut down shutter, he can't even get in. so what he calls the bag, they have no explanation for the lod finally told reporters at the time he said, look, i'm broke. i can't even feed my family because i can't get into my bank account. now to be fair, banks do, on occasion, phrase accounts over concerns from the police suspicious activity,

etc. but the numbers recently are way up. is there that much more suspicious activity? well, here, let me tell you what i learned according to the banking policy institute, over the past 4 years. more than a 1000000 people have had their accounts shut down. americans. if you are asking why was mister nickle rise account shut down? the answer is it was done at the request of the f, b i the f, b i. and eventually after a series of media reports that determine that mister and her, i have done nothing wrong. he was able to move his funds out of there and put it into another bank, but it's irritating. it's irritating the thing that something like this could even happen. and that it seems to be happening now with more frequency. bank of america told me it was shut down. they refused to give me an explanation. they told me i would get my money after it was the result of which he says he was told would take

$10.00 to $20.00 days. and all of a sudden i find out, i'm gro, can be my family. now let's take a look at something. let's take a look at what's happening globally, which by the way, it is part of the reason that the us dollar is kind of falling out of favor worldwide as well, because of asset forfeiture. but it's not just the u. s. the okay, for example, is also accused in this alleged highest. there may be no better example of this than what the brits did to venezuela when they seized $2000000000.00 and then as well and gold that was held in the bank of england. their pre text while they were doing so at the request of one, why don't and who the hell is one wide go? who's the some guy that the united states in the brits decided one day to a point as the new president event as well? yes, you heard that, right? they appointed some guy as the new president event as well. even though been as well already had a president named nicholas my door. oh. all right,

so let's stop and think about this for just a minute. by the way, the u. s. and the brands decide to name out of the blue a new president of venezuela because they don't like the president who is there now . and then they seize the country's assets at the best of the president. they a point. now look whether you agree or disagree with then as well as present government or their politics. does any country really have the right to seize any other countries gold and can their bank, who did so ever be trusted again? after doing so. that of course, there is a report at 600000000000 in russia's assets frozen recently by the united states. the okay. and canada in march, 1 of the most significant sanctions ever inflicted on any country. and it leads one to as give a questionable controversial or the stabilizing invasion of any other country be at

the opinion of whatever other country is reason enough to take away a country's assets. well then, lo and behold, we have to ask, i mean, just to be fair as an american, why wasn't the same thing been done to us? here in the us, after the united states invaded iraq? i mean, there's the seizure of funds from russian 1000000000 areas as well, or as they've come to be called in the western media rushes oligarchs. oligarchs is a funny word, isn't it? according to a p, some $30000000000.00 and bank accounts, homes, jobs, and other assets have been seized from russian citizens $30000000000.00. now look, i'm a fan of russian, billionaires or oligarchs, or whatever the hell you want to call them for that matter. but what about us billionaires? i mean, this really begs the question, doesn't it? should anyone who profits from a war or corruption of any type have their assets ease?

okay. do you want to go there? let's do it. how about c o is of lockheed martin, boeing, general dynamics rafia and who got the spoils of the useless and disastrous wars in afghanistan and iraq? just the name of a few where they us deployed 8 trillion dollars. and they got that. we say that again, 8 trillion dollars. and if you want to find american oligarchs, by the way, there's plenty of candidates out there. in fact, you can look no further than this guy. see that guy right there? that's billionaire harlem cro. he was recently alleged when he's been buying off supreme court justices like to. 2 thomas, with lavish vacations and yachts of trips around the world that even a house for his mother. this is such an important topic and you know, i think we've got the perfect guest to talk about this column mix in front of the show veteran radio and political analysts. toast of critical our on sputnik joins

us now to talk about this. the idea that we have come now to a point where our beloved country, the united states of america can go around by the way. we're not the only ones, but let's just start there. literally freezing other countries assets in the case of what happened was with venezuela 1st cool with the, you know, very assets in the bank of england. they literally just stole her gold. i mean, they still are gold. um, what do you make of this? well what, what, what, how would you characterize this trend garland? well, i, i think what we're looking at is this is the essence of the unit polar order. this is the essence of the rules based order. us laid world order, all of the euphemisms that tony blink and use this to talk about how the neo cons view view the world it arbitrarily an arbitrary application of the law as opposed to rule of law. where in the u. s. can basically do anything they want to and no

one can push back the problem with that is that now there are alternative options for countries, alternative options for corporations. and so now that the, the options are there in the past where a particular country corporation, nation, etc, didn't have a lot of alternatives as far as international economic and can infrastructure. they can that have bricks is rising china, russia, etc. and so they could get away with it before because people didn't have other places to sink their money. now that there are other places to think their money, people are simply going to look for other options that are safer. and what do you make of just the bank of england case by itself, the fact that they literally and, and the way they want to buy on it was so fascinating the united states in england get together and they name a new president of venezuela. they say this dude white though is now your president,

then they get, why don't the guys, they named not the people of it as well? who would like to know the united states names of the president then gets that guy who they name to sign off on their season of the gold from that country, which he is not really the president of my door. oh is the sign off on it and then they sees what was it $2000000000.00, i think. yeah. $2000000000.00 of gold. that just seems him to use hell that. yeah. and in addition, they also use one guy though, in a last, they are scheme to use the courts to grab sit go, which is the, the international energy powerful energy corporation that was owned by the venezuelan government. they seized the money extensively. we were told that they that they transferred to money the money to the one g, y o and his alternative government to run the country, whatever that meant. but it seems that most of the money in the state go has disappeared. again, what we have is simply

a criminal. so international criminal scheme and you know, the reality is this is not due in i believe it's somewhere around the 19141930, some of 13. somewhere around in the united states literally invaded 80, physically invaded 80, physically went to their vault and took the gold out of eighty's volts and brought it back to the united states. so as i said, the big difference now is when the world sees these kinds of things, they look for other alternatives and options. that's the big difference. they've gotten away with this for so long that they feel that they can do virtually anything. and when we see the, a hypocritical arguments that are made, whether we is about conflicts, international criminal justice, the union, etc, that are made, the leaders of the united states are living in a past world. i mean, if you look at the up, let's face it, look at the age of the joe binds the mitch mcconnell, if the people who leave this country, they are still living at

a time when they could get away with this stuff. and the world has passed them by and then we're going to pay the price economically. i think what they're doing now is economic warfare and economic warfare is very different from no direct warfare. now, i do know this has gone on for some time, especially in the latin america with the c i a, in places like guatemala and columbia and the dominican republic, etc, etc. but even in those cases, they were working usually with marines who they had also sent in the c i a was heavily involved. now it just seems like it's banking transactions where we say ours is bigger than yours. and we're just going to take what you got as. yeah, well, there's another major factor. i think that's changed to change the game. and that is, that the, the us went after rush, they went after, you know, there are 3 world powers, russia, china, and the united states and the united states. finally, after going after, you know, smaller countries to do it for additionally going after countries that were unable

to stand up, the us international power, they finally decided, okay, we're going to go after russia and we're going to take them down economically. and if you look at the, if you look at the sanctions against china, the us is literally saying we have this international internet, a economic infrastructure, and we'll use that to take out the big guys. what that done is that sent a message to all countries, such as, say, a saudi arabia say to people to the billionaires worldwide who, you know, were parking their money into by the u, a. e. and they had it, some of it in london, it sent the message to them, but no, and it states that the international power players failed. okay. yeah, they'll go after the little guys, they'll go after some left, this countries in south america or africa. but we're too big, they won't touch us in going after russia and china, they've changed the game. everything you're saying is true, but it always comes back to this. and this is what should bother. all of us,

not just me as an american. these things that my country is doing to other countries which seem terrible, it's outright fever. it seems to me to go unchecked because there is nothing in the system neither are politic. team players nor are media players are jerks. suppose that reporters and journalist to cover it to say it and to fight for a little countries out there who say, we're not going to stand, we're not going to stand for this because it's wrong and we're not supposed to be cheerleaders. were supposed to be truth tellers that that's, that's my biggest complaint with fits and seems given what you and i do for a living, garland, how to use. how does it sit with you? well, you know, the said state of affairs is that the u. s. media is now simply on an operation arm of the us government, particularly the us state department and the,

and the intelligence communities. and what they do actually is they act as a medium to rather than cover what the government is doing to cover up what the government's doing. i firmly believe that if the american people in the aggregate understood what their government is doing and understood why that it would be rejected. so we're at a point now where what they're doing is so obvious and so wrong that they have to hide it from the american people. and that's the now the job of the united states media. sadly, we're now in a country where if you have an alternative perspective for perspective, when you make an attempt to, to voice that on social media, you'll be sense or mainstream media. you won't get back on anymore as you and i both well know. so the media, they just cover me in for these uh, you know, kind of like a mob lawyer here there to cover the crowds. it does seem though, recently we've never gone as far as we've gone,

especially in the case of russia. the numbers are astronomical. the assets taken from oligarchs. i'm no fan of all the guards, trust me. but i think we just, we got just as many in this country as they do over there. but the fact that we're just taking private assets away from countries and people seems to me like almost a bridge too far and where will this lead? i'm concerned, it's what we're going to talk about with god next. and when we come back to stay there, girl, i will continue this conversation on the inside them. by the way, if you want to continue this conversation, we can do so on twitter or x or whatever. you call it these days. my handle. rick sanchez, tv. that's rick sanchez, tv. let me know what you think. why do you agree or disagree? i'll see you there. so when we come back, the money that used to be in the bank of afghanistan, who does it belong to now? us or i've got to step the

look forward to talking to you all. that technology should work for people. a robot must obey the orders given by human beings except we're so shorter is that conflict with the 1st law show you alignment of the patient. we should be very careful about our personal intelligence at the point, obviously is to make a trust, rather than see it the job. i mean, with the artificial intelligence, we have so many with him in the robot most protects his phone existence was alexis the

1918. the countries of the west won the final victory over the ottoman empire. the sultan's government capitulated to the inside and sign the humiliating armistice of little girls. great britain and france, and italy wanted not only to destroy by the ottoman empire, but also to divide the prime orderly turkish lands among themselves. in 1919, their armies began to land on turkish territory. but the west decided to choose greece as the main striking force. seeking to make others realize its aggressive plans for an intervention, provo mass, indignation among the turkish peoples. the national liberation struggle was led by

the experience of general mustafah come all as a 3rd in order to bear down the enemy, a bank on the mobilization of the nation. and the alliance with russia, which acted as a united front, with turkish patriots. at the end of august 1922. as a 3rd, so army won a decisive victory over the invaders in the battle of doomed living art. and within a month liberated all asia minor. from them, the impressive success of the circus army force the west to make concessions. in 1923, the loss on these treaty was signed turkey. one of the 1st countries in asia manage the defeat the colonial empires and defend its independence. becoming an example for millions of the press on the planet the

. so let's continue with this last year, president barton announced that he was transferring $3500000000.00 from afghanistan to a trust fund established in washington. the president said that he was doing so because he wanted it to be available for humanitarian aid and for possible legal claims from the families of the victims of $911.00. something that happened more than 20 years ago. right. so you have to ask yourself, we have to ask ourselves using our place to take very money. and we're back with the garland mix and veteran radio and politic land list. the voice of the critical, our on the sputnik and i guess we can't have this conversation without cutting to the chase. and that is the currency of what's happening right now. $600000000000.00 and russian assets had been frozen by the united states and the

united kingdom and canada. that is an astronomical number. $600000000000.00. i don't even know where to begin. uh, garland with that number. oh, well i, i think it reflects a desperation. it's kind of like a person who jo was, you know, you've heard of the infamous analogy of someone who yells to get what they want. they don't get what they want. and the only thing they know how to do is jo, louder and louder, and the latter, they yelled, the less they get what they want, the us empire, when after russia, you know, it was a full spectrum attack and but diplomatically, economically, etc. with the economic situation didn't pan out the way they had suspected, they decided ok, we'll take more, we'll get more if we can just take their money. i think some of it also is out of your anger and emotion, the anger, it rushes to have the temerity to exist and to try to, you know, expand the there and you know,

their economic power in the world which every country has a right to do so they're angry, they're trying to take them out, they don't know what to do, and they're just going to take more and more. and of course, let's not forget, there's the issue of green here. look at what happened to libya when the nato over through libya, likes for somewhere between $40.00 and $70000000000.00 from a small country like libya there solving well, fund disappeared, but it didn't disappear, it was stolen. so i would imagine a part of this is simply greeting. they're going to steal some of this and, you know, the criminals will divided amongst themselves as best they can. but there will be a severe price. i mean, but to, i mean it's easy to just say empire for and criminals and all that thing, but we're not talking about the criminals. and we're not talking about the empires . we're talking about a nation, the united states of america, washington. one of the most admired countries on the face of the earth, acting in a belligerent way, and no one seems to be checking them. and,

you know, aside from the countries that are being victimized in this case. and that's just easy to do. you just say, well, it's put, you don't need to listen to him. he's hitler, he's a criminal, as they often do. it has to go beyond main calling and this type of activity i guess i'm looking for for a solution from you is there was, well, i'll put it like this. you know, the nature of the world orders that is that a solution is arising even as we speak. remember, you know, difficult times that never changes a person, it exposes their initial nature. so what we're seeing, this is what the empire is people for many years thought the, you know, in the united states felt that they were living on a luxury liner. and the reality is they were living on a pirate ship. they were on the jolly roger going around the world steel and everybody's stuff is being exposed now. but, but the nature of a world order is, as i say, you have bricks, you have a shanghai cooperation order in recognizing that the u. s. lid. economic

infrastructure is on trustworthy. it's just natural other countries are saying we need, we need to build some alternative infrastructures, people who invest capital, what do they want most? and mostly they want stability and secure security with their investments. so this is just natural economic rules that happen. people are seeking an alternative method to have stability for their, for their investments. they see the us will steal it. and so they're going to build something else to that where they can put the money in. and they can be assured in the long term that their funds will be secure in this new situation. we're now dealing with, with israel and come us and obviously, you know, israel is killing 34 or 5 times as many people as hamas killed. and what, how boss did was wrong. but what israel is now doing with the cooperation of the united states with the assistance of the united states is being seen certainly throughout the world and certainly in the air of world as just dastardly. at this

point of this balance that you and i just talked about where we see rush, um, sorry, ravia china, ron even previously to an a certain extent israel, what is going to happen to that consortium? now, with this new wrinkle, with this new potential escalation in the middle east. oh, i think what's going to happen in, you know, i've talked to um, journalists who are based in the middle east and what they're telling me is that the, the people in the muslim world in the middle east now clearly understand that they have to turn to the east they have to turn to russia, china, even india. they have to turn away from the west. they don't trust the waste west anymore. they seem as literally a seat in the west as their enemies and they are they of course, this is a very dangerous situation. they want to have this situation to, you know,

to be alleviated and dealt with. but uh, that's it. this is the final nail in the economic coughing of the, of the let's just say the ties between the west and the middle east when this is. so yeah, here's where the power, what, what the, what if it will that, can this, let me ask it this way. is it possible that this can do anything but empower that new consortium as i call it, these countries who used to be outliers who are now coming together and pushing back on the us global economics as well. it will absolutely, absolutely. it will, it will empower them very much because of the, the issue. if you look at your, what is the issue with europe as if europe have economic power, industrial power, etc. but what they don't have is the natural resources and what the new a, you know, group of powers is coming together. what the new world order is really doing. it's bringing together the countries that have not been the industrialized is bringing together china, russian, india of industrial powers with the powers of natural reason with the natural

resources, the old tax advocate, etc. so they're creating a future environment of, i mean, an incubator for great economic power, and they're the, the traditional powers and making enemies of them and that, so there will be no trust to do deals. they just feel like we've got to work together. we've got a bill together, we gotta save our money together. i think that's what you're going to see. a complete lack of trust and a dissolution of the current world order that will be considerably sooner than that . we thought it would be. got a nixon veteran radio and the political analyst and host of the critical our on the sputnik radio. thank you, my friend. thank you. so before we go, i want to remind you of our mission. it's simple, really. what we want to do is kind of be silo the world. we've got to stop living in these boxes where we only think are truths matters to stone live in boxes. truth is everywhere, expansion. and i'll be looking for you right here,

where i hope to provide a direct impact the the lowest points of view as to the side of the vehicle. so the

motion store slid are the for the money and dumb of the school in which it seems to stay on the the, there's many problems in u. s. society now that they're facing because of the, their model is again, it's not able to fulfill the expectations of people guessing growth in, in, in, in homeless mass us and growth in poverty. this is a lot of traffic ations on the people who say so that they need to find a way to, to vote for, you know, solving their own problems and not trying to police the world.

the, the mass protest drops across the welding solar diary to a smaller side and demand unusual and the balance on the equals $100.00 days of water and gas that the, the lead, the $135.00 people are killed in the past 24 hours that idea of strikes and the enclave of the south area designated as a safe area of theme. the main pocket. also ahead. we were focused on making sure that the conflict ongoing alga doesn't spread as washington talks fees that.