Skip to main content

tv   Direct Impact  RT  January 27, 2024 3:30pm-4:01pm EST

3:30 pm
and over the border from ukraine's stock of region to head, the plane follows flying over the russian province of belgrade. now this 4th, it shows the crate in p o. w is being taken into the aircraft, an eel $7.00 to $6.00 military transport plane before take off the block box. finally, a flight record is had been recovered from the wreckage and the investigation is still on the way. it's on the, on the wall correspondent andrea le ged says, but increasing and authorities are in the k off over the incident. we have c is for the 1st of the ukraine inside was incomplete calls soft the, the shooting of this uh, quite of this our customer. because the 1st time they say that the, they are nothing form of the about the life plan of this, the 76 after they say that the least of the were pretty is on us for the next change. it was a fake. and then they have to meet the yes, maybe this leases so through the bought. so we are not to have to have the
3:31 pm
communication about these exchanges. so a lot of cost, a lot of cost, a lot of confusion in this side. and then it said those things to see what's happened with the western weapons systems, because uh i, i'm, i'm sure you'll remember that the 1st time uh, the west said that the, uh, the west, the weapon system are not all over to use in the territory of production only for the fun ukraine, but now this a flight that was a heat in the direction on that are from 3030. so this is a violation of this, the prescription of the west of boston, another of ukraine. the archie does come this way. you can get the details of all the stories will fall on this house. i'll see you again in about 30 minutes the
3:32 pm
the, the primer, sanchez. i've been doing news for 30 years and 2 languages all over the world. here in the united states. i've interviewed for president's work, and 4 of the us is major television networks. i don't like what they do by the way, because i think new should be honest and direct and impactful and this is direct impact. the i want to start by showing you a picture of somebody who's probably not supposed to be front and center in the
3:33 pm
news suddenly is this is janet jo. and so you're there for title is treasury secretary for the united states of america. as such, she doesn't really make for a policy what she's supposed to. if a treasury secretaries and federal reserve chairs, which was her previous job, are supposed to stick to essentially accounting and nomics. they usually shy away from engaging in politics, certainly world politics. but here she is sharing our personal opinion on the middle east. mm. mm. i think america stands behind israel's period. we stand with israel. america is also made clear, the israel, we're working very closely with the israel leaves that they have right to defend themselves from weight. there's more here she is
3:34 pm
now assuring the world that the us as plenty of it's a tax payers money to spend, will continue to do so by giving tens of billions of dollars of it to ukraine. will also giving tens of billions more to israel and whatever else it might need. i think the answer is absolutely american and certainly afford to stand with israel and to support this reels, military needs. and we also can, in most support ukraine and its struggle against russia find the way she's not alone. secretary of state anthony blanket is assuring as real as he has a ukraine. that when it comes to funding, quote, we got your back. that's what he's saying. we got your back,
3:35 pm
plenty of money. don't worry that there's national security adviser takes all of us, who's also assuring his corporate media friends that he will put together a new weapons package for both israel and ukraine, which for starters, will be significantly more than the $2000000000.00 each that they've already guaranteed and not going to take the place of the o and b director who will present the requests that we send up at the present was very clear today that we will be making a request to the congress. and it will include a request for funding for support to israel. and he has also been equally clear that we are going to renew our request to the congress for aid to ukraine. what exact form that all takes that'll be worked out and presented by others, not by me. but the notion that we're going to go up and ask for is real aid and ask for ukraine aid. that's unequivocal. we are going to do that. and of course the kuta gra, there is the president himself,
3:36 pm
mr. bide fresh off his visit to israel and mr. biden told reporters that he will now tie together his funding with to ukraine with the funding for israel. it, it, it's, it's a kind of a to for right, or maybe better said if you want one from column a, you got to take one from column b. that's why the more i'm going to send to congress an urgent budget request to fund another dispatch. so security needs to support are critical partners, including israel and ukraine, is a smart investment is going to pay dividends for americans. security for generations help us keep american troops out of harm's way. now if you're a us taxpayer flag, diane, and you're hearing this change during sound of a cash register going off in your head with all of these numbers. while your money is being spent on causes that have really nothing to do with you or your family,
3:37 pm
rest assured to are not alone. in fact, there are members of congress who are now asking some of the same questions that don't dress them from day one. they're wor, pounds, that's all right, and their business is very good right now. borrowing money from china to send it to ukraine makes no sense. you know, who else starting to ask, you know, who else starting to worry about this money? money he thought was promised to him, but may now be going somewhere else toward a cause he fears may trump is. yeah, ukraine president vladimir zalinski. it explains say press reports. why he was so eager to try and combine his cause with that of israel's. how did try to do that? well, by literally inviting himself to join the us delegation as they met with his really
3:38 pm
officials immediately after these almost attack. interesting move right. well, instead of being welcome though he was kind of humiliated, that's how it was reported globally, by the way. that's not my word. it was reported that way in newspapers like india's induced on times in fact, what prime minister benjamin netanyahu essentially told that your grand in president was thanks, but no thanks. that's on. yeah, those exact words as lensky were, quote, this is not the right time. ouch. so here's what's going on. now is the lens keys up, obviously, sensing something about this situation while you are so, so shows in the bottom administration continue to promise ukraine, that their check is on the way history is telling a different story. as there are countless examples in u. s. foreign policy and kept promises when priorities just changed. and there's no
3:39 pm
bigger priority in u. s. foreign policy, by the way. then the state of israel americans need to remember it's not that is real needs america, america needs israel. israel is the front line of defense for the uranium regime and harris that want to hurt us and want to hurt our friends. and we need to be honest with the american people. and so well, us funding shift toward israel and the way from ukraine really to early to tell. but those closest to the situation seem to be feeling that it's all but uh, a forgone conclusion. at this point, and the person coming to that conclusion, by the way is this is gonna maybe shock you maybe not. none other than the finance minister of ukraine himself, sir, he march and go in a moment of candor. has told reuters that as he sees it,
3:40 pm
the owners are tiring of ukraine. speaking of the international monetary fund and the world bank meetings and mark cash, morocco. merchant goes said that his country has been promised billions of dollars, but he's still waiting for it. and then he admitted the following. and now let's talk about the u. s. congress. is that an impasse specifically over spending? and in large measure, it's about the spend that's being sent to ukraine. and as you've been hearing during these arguments, many on the republican side of the aisle or calling it money that is not well spent, it's a problem that has in fact reached a fever pitch so much so that it's already costs the old speaker of the house. is job, it has sent the entire body really just tell us,
3:41 pm
just tell us what was in the secret ukraine side deal. what commitments were made to print, to president biden, to continue the spending of president biden in exchange for doing things for president biden. it is becoming increasingly clear who the speaker of the house already works for. and it's not the republican conference but there is an even bigger concern for ukraine that you have to be. you have to be something like maybe someone is that going american insider to really appreciate it . but you have to understand the american spirit is a we americans are if nothing else, man, we are extremely sickles. and we fall in love and we fall out of love with the latest media fad. like nothing you've ever seen before. nbc, cnn fox news, they sell it and we buy it until they sell something else. and then we just move on
3:42 pm
to the next thing. whatever else they're selling. now, one day afghanistan is the worst place of the world, and we've got to attack until it isn't. the rock has weapons of mass destruction. oops. maybe they don't. syria. yeah, man. olivia, it's so confusing, right? how vietnam used to be the domino that would tip over lots of countries and make them all commies and to show the world today. vietnam's are trading partner. hello . funny how it works, right. and then there's a war on terror. wherever those people were all replaced by the next scene, the question for ukraine is in the physical world of us politics. the 20. busy of our media cycle, the american voters who are simply used to moving on. how does it remain relevant? how does you claim remain relevant? and how does it avoid not being replaced or replaced by the next big
3:43 pm
thing? hey, by the way, i'd like to continue this conversation with you. what do you say we do it on twitter racks as it's now called. i think my handle rick sanchez, tv. rick sanchez, tv and i'll be looking for you there. okay. when we come back, why have things gotten even worse for those who want to continue to send funds to ukraine? i'll tell you the the
3:44 pm
hey, welcome back. i'm rick sanchez. 2 things of happened recently that have to be extremely concerning for ukrainian president the zalinski on top of some of the things we previously discussed. one is that twitter owner, eli mosque is expressing his very pointed disappointment with the ukranian counter offensive of sharing it. and he's going on to say that, in fact, the us should already start having talks with russia to establish some kind of
3:45 pm
truce here. but even more concerning them, that probably is the fact that the us house of representatives of you know, this battle that's been going on for so long. well guess what? they finally have a new speaker or a new leader in the house congress. his name is mike johnson, he's a conservative republican, and he's been expressing his disapproval ascending more funding to ukraine. and started talking about this is march little boat out. he's in the international relations. he's also in a, a security at list based in moscow. and he has a background in both defense, military and security. so he's running the perfect person to talk to about this. i want to start with this mark. so we got genet y'all and comes out and she says lot, we certainly got enough money to fund taiwan and is real and ukraine. and so it is entity blue. do uh, sorta is uh, jake sullivan. the prices are united states as we have plenty of money,
3:46 pm
don't worry about it. in fact, we're also going to do a package that can be. busy taken care of sending funds to the border as well along with texas in the arizona. so are they right? got plenty of money. no, nothing to worry about. to read sites or have of a it's always an honor to in a pleasure to be on the show. um, well, i mean, i guess that is a question that you really need to be asking directly to us taxpayers. right. the pentagon budget for last year was nearly a trillion dollars, right? not counting conflicts spending, which is it access. and by then has just asked for another $106000000000.00 on top of that. so this goes to fuel, you know, a whole host of military requirements including a network of well. busy over $800.00 military bases around the world,
3:47 pm
which is, you know, it's about $750.00 military bases more than anyone else has around the world and most of those others are us allies. um, so what the us tax payers funding is primacy right there. a military primacy, the goal of the us to not only have the most powerful military in the world, but to have a more powerful military then all of any potential rivals challengers or discontents at the same time. and it is interesting to say that i'm going to interrupt, you can, you just made me think of something that's been kind of not going to be a little bit as an american living here in the great united states of america. country that i'm very proud of it for many great things that we have done lately. i
3:48 pm
have gotten the feeling that everything military and militaristic have more like is on the present. you cannot go to a sporting event without having to watch rockets literally, please. you know, where planes going above as part of the beginning of the game. you can't go to any event anywhere without having soldiers come out with the fly, which, you know, then you have to salute the flag. and then, you know, saying that atlanta, which i'm fine with, obviously, but it just seems like there's parameters towards everything being so military, you can't turn on the tv without seeing something that's joining to the military and defense and more. and then on top of all that, you just said that we're almost spending a trillion dollars the most ever, according to what the, by the administration just did. and yet every time you turn around, somebody's asking you for a donation for our soldiers, for the military,
3:49 pm
etc. it's kinda weird and i, i'm probably not the only one in this country who's noticing that. but it's not something you want to say publicly because then people are gonna think you're not patriotic to. yeah, i, i think is really uh you made it a good point. um, i think that on multiple levels, not just the military and the military spending itself, but the militarization of us society on, you know, everything from sporting events to a completely militarized police force across the country. uh, to uh, you know, uh, domestic intelligence services like the f, b i and everything um, are incredibly, uh, you know, militarized to a degree the, and i'll do you one more movies, the media cable, those shows the newspapers they,
3:50 pm
they carry on the drum beat of war so that when suddenly whereas should we be sending money to country backs because we need the help of everybody's like, yeah, i guess so. is that what we're supposed to do? sure. uh huh. but i mean, it's kind of like that's how they get you because no one who, no one say why no one's asking that question mark to when the us was launching a cruise missile strikes into syria. a few years ago, i remember there was a, a journalist anchor for one of the big 3. i can't remember or the moment, but he was on, you know imbedded with the forces on the ship and, and he was live and talking about how the site of a cruise missile was the most beautiful thing he has ever seen in his life. and i'm like, i mean, i'm x u. s. navy, and i don't know, i've seen
3:51 pm
a lot more beautiful things than chris, are going to take more of the cation of everything having to do. and i'm not against having a standing military. i'm not against using that military when necessary, but 20 years in afghanistan to get absolutely nothing but make a whole lot of people rich. same, we can say about a situation in iraq. and now the story we're getting that we have to just continue to give gabrielle what ever the hell it was? no matter what it is that we co got there back. oh, and we're still going to be pumping money to your grade and we're going to be bumping what it is i want after a while, it starts to sound pretty crazy, especially considering that most americans today, according to most studies, barely couldn't get by paycheck to paycheck. without going broke yeah, i mean, where is, i have to wonder why haven't the american people demanded accountability
3:52 pm
from their politicians. we started 20 trillion dollars wasted on this fail fiasco where our politicians and our military lied to us continually about the state of the conflict for 20 years. i rac, livia syria, where are we still have us occupation forces sitting on syria's oil and weak fields? right? well, that's the, let's talk about that because that's an interesting point you raised and this one that i think we need to address and it has to do with really 2 things. are media, which is where we get all information, you know, the average work in american good guy, good galleys. they, they put in their hours, they come home, they'd get their beer, they shouldn't throw d b and they're gonna watch. i don't know blitzer, sean hannity who the hell knows some cable news channel or something and they're gonna expect that they're going to be told the truth. and in fact, they're generally not what they're generally they're not those people were never
3:53 pm
question. what are military or what our government does in terms of military expansion is. and it's really interesting to because in the past we used to and then the 2nd part of this is politicians. they're supposed to protect us against this kind of study, but they don't. why is it that those 2 entity seem like they're in codes with whatever the heck the military industrial complex wants, which is more wars and more say well, one of the, of, of course is the revolving door between the us military complex. uh and uh, both the politicians and often even journalists, i mean there, there is that, you know, as lobby as there's a huge revolving door. but it's more than just personal interest because military industrial complex is the vehicle for an audiology, for an ideology of american exceptionalism. that demands us primacy and had
3:54 pm
gemini, and that goal is seems to be pushed by the us media. i don't remember. there's a reason why we call the media of the for, for state, as if they are a force and an equal branch of government. how many press conferences have, have we seen? where reporters asking questions of either the you know, the state department, the white house press corps, the pentagon badgering. why haven't you sent this weapon to you? great. not. not asking but badgering. why have a lot of the boards did during the vietnam war, which got to go back fiasco right as yes. right into and then and then out of. but there was a big, huge narrative change somewhere along the line and they just don't know if the media is capable of that type of the sense that they eventually
3:55 pm
became capable of during the vietnam war. today. as long as a guy at a military corporation, whether it's ready on or anybody else can put money in the pocket of these politicians. these politicians will be able to support wars because they're essentially accepting legal brides. and we're talking about hundreds of millions of dollars by himself got over a $100000000.00 to become the president of the united states. much of it from some of these corporations. so house in america and my not to then doubt whether the reason he's really fully in support of ukraine has less to do with my needs and my to his needs. and more with his needs to have a question how, how do you vote against northrop grumman and, and goldman sachs?
3:56 pm
i mean it's, it's impossible with the serious problem that we're west country right now though. i mean, it's how do we mean i'm an american and then i want this country to do right. and i'm not saying i don't, we don't want to be involved. they'll generally from time to time. but it starts to look like it's just the front of the game. that's the problem. unfortunately, as long as the us dollar continues to be the global reserve currency, which is starting to rain but only slowly and the not a process that will happen. then the us can keep printing more money and borrowing more money and it's called, you know, quantitative easing and they can continue spending these enormous military budgets . but i think that there's more than just personal interest. there is a broad bi partisan consensus on
3:57 pm
the goals of us for and in military policy in pursuit of primacy and had gemini ben rhodes called this a norm as establishment that really decides us foreign policy. mark your delight to talk to thank you. my friend, i enjoyed the conversation. thanks for having me rick. it's always a pleasure. likewise. hey, before we go, i want to remind you of our mission and simple. really. what we want to do is try and the silo the world. we've got to stop living in these little boxes where we think only our information matters. and it's all we read are see troops don't live in boxes to this everywhere. i'm actually interest. i'll be looking for you again right here where i hope to provide a direct impact. the
3:58 pm
choice between democracy and talk or see is a false one. because the ultimate issue is about who controls information the means of production and distribution and who controls money in debt. and increasingly, in the united states, for, for that matter. but in china, russia in other countries, is controlled by multinational corporations which are not an alternative government, but are rather a form of government itself, which is on account of the name of the death of him. but he's a got one of the see at the end of me say, guess i'm all what had a little more of a school? i thought of it a i wanna say and stuff like that. it's on whether the media you got on. i'm glad
3:59 pm
you know you got one way just under then you'll sit in data sorta my idea that i fits on a k. i knew i love is that goes to you that i mean, i think going on because the i'm a persona of a be that me court that i, i didn't go to almost the end to see the best. so that sort of i that out of in to see if they have and the single man to some of the manual and all that. i don't, why don't the remainder measured on it? be just the modem, units off on, you know, the system go less the say i could be of them, but these are, let's see, let me look to see like tennessee, but i do you have the tenant out of this and fit on. so being at that point, i see on there the most down in the boss on the new site, one of the subs have been in the media mckinney and so those new battery needs to be what somebody that gets some game with your mouth. but i feel so you see it goes in a 2nd. i mean, either it is by you say know things on
4:00 pm
a something different then generally a going i think the interested in the all jerry, i calls for the un security council to convene and they've been to force israel to implement the rulings handed down by the international court of justice. i think the world has already realized the absurdity of israel and the condemnation of israel as a hey, court has justified that into ron local, say the i c. j. a preliminary moving on to use role as a key applied for justice. put fee is remain that these are on the march on whether it's this function of guys that as it's backed by united states, the bullying at the lone star states the texas job that has pledged to personally secure the border with mexico. ignoring the fairly close coming out of.

9 Views

info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on