personally killed the russian stalls in judas. thanks. and using windows, us troops consisted of ukrainian nationalistic. include that as dirty work, how the president, the ro crane stood up with the entire parliament of canada and applauded this miracle piece colored dimensionally. how can this be imagined? got that the president of ukraine himself, by the way, is a jew by nationality. even when really my question is, what do you do about it? i mean hitler's been dead for 80 years. nazi germany no longer exists in so true. and so i think what you're saying is you want to extinguish or at least control ukrainian nationalism. but how, how do you do that? what you mean you wish to approve us what you want to listen to me? your question is very subtle. and i can tell you what i think do not take offense of course, because of the ocean pride to believe the top of this question appears to be

settled. it is quite investigate unless you use a hitler hesitating. there are so many years or 80 years when each test, by his example, lives on a vehicle who exterminate the jews. russians as she holds our lives, he wouldn't use new. great, and then the president, even currently the president of today's ukraine laws family in the canadian parliament, gave us a standing ovation. typical lucas, can we say that we have completely approved technically this ideology? what if what we see happening today? and that is what the not certification is in our understanding. and we have to get rid of those people who maintain this concept and support this practice and try to preserve that. that is what we do not certification is what that is, what we mean, right? my question is, what more specific it was? of course not a defense of the nazis knew or otherwise. it was a practical question. you don't control the entire country, you don't control give,

you don't seem like you want to. so how, how do you will eliminate a culture or an ideology or feelings or a view of history in a country that you don't control? what do you do about that? i wasn't here. ok from you, but gosh, describe them. would you be to go to the stumble? yeah, you know, as strange as it may seem to you during the negotiations that they stumble, we did agree that we have it all in writing. neil now susan would not be cultivated in ukraine, including that. that was be prohibited at the legislative level. mr. carson, we agreed on that. if that is, it turns out to can be done during the negotiation process. there is nothing humiliating for ukraine as a modern civilized state is any state allowed to promote not citizens. and that's because it is not, is it that is it making it will

there be talks and why haven't there been talks about resolving the conflict in ukraine? peace talks really and you bring it here and you actually and ocean was focused on you said last one, your bus you'd see for they had been they reached the very high stage of coordination of positions in a complex process. but still they were almost finalized. but after we withdrew of troops from kia, have, as i have already said, the other side threw away all these agreements and a bade, the instructions of western countries, european countries, and the united states to fight russia to the bidder. and moreover, the president of ro, crane has legislated the band on negotiating with russia. he signed a decree for bidding every once in a go see it with russia, you know, but how are we going to negotiate if he for baby himself and every one to do this?

now, we know that he is putting for, with some ideas about the settlement. but in order to agree on something, we need to have a dialogue. is that not right? what, but you wouldn't be speaking to your credit in present, you'd be speaking to the american president. when was the last time we spoke to joe, but i cannot remember when i talked to him because i do not remember we can look it up. you can tell, remember, know, why do i have to remember everything? i have my own things to do. we have domestic political affairs while he's funding the war that you're fighting. so i would think that would be memorable. well, don't sure. wonderful. nice. well, yes, he funds, but i talked to him before the special military operation, of course, and i said to him, then by the way, i will not go into details. i never do what i said to him, then i believe that you are making a huge mistake of historic proportions by supporting everything that is happening

there in ukraine by pushing russia way. i told him, told him repeatedly, by the way, i think that would be correct if i stop here. what did he say? when you ask him please, it is easier for you. you are a citizen of the united states. go and ask him. it is not appropriate for me to comment on our conversation, but you haven't spoken to him since before february of 2022. and you? good? no, no, no. we haven't spoken. expect a good. certain contexts are being main thing though. speaking of which we'll put in the luxury and do you remember what i told you about my proposal to work together on a missile defense system? yes, no. what do most most especially to see if you can ask all of them that will. all of them are safe and sound. thank god wish you. the former president come to lease

a safe and sound. and i think mr. gates and the current director of the intelligence agency, mr. burns, the then invested there to russia, in my opinion, are very successful invested there. they were all with assisted these conversations . some ask them as much the same here, if you are interested in what mr. president biden responded to me, ask him. at any rate, i talk to him about it. i'm, i'm, i'm definitely interested. but from the outside it seems like this could devolve or evolve into something that brings the entire world into conflict and could initiate some nuclear launch. and so why don't you just call by me and say, let's work this out. i'm not sure what you should or should you should. what's there to work out? it's very simple. i repeat just this concept of putting it on medication. we have contacts through various agencies going sky, so something

a good thing that i will tell you what we are saying on this matter and what we're conveying to the us leadership. we, if you really want to stop fighting, you need to stop supplying weapons. it will be over within a few weeks. that's it. how much is it? and then we can agree on some terms. before you do that, to stop what's easier? why would they call in it? what's your dates? talk to him about 2 more. beg came for what and what mess with the fact that what the quote was, you look like you're going to deliver such and such weapons to ukraine. oh, i'm afraid, i'm afraid, please don't. what is there to talk about? do you think nato is worried about this becoming a global war, or a nuclear conflict? the least that's what they're talking about. and they are trying to intimidate their own population within the imaginary russian threats.

this is an obvious fact and thinking people will not tell us steins but thinking people analyst, those who are engaged in real politics, just smart people understand perfectly well that this is a faith doing it. so they're trying to fuel the russian threats. the threat. i think you're referring to is a russian invasion of poland whitefield expansionist behavior, is. can you imagine a scenario where you send russian troops co kilograms, which is the phone system? the problem, in one case, if poland attacks russia, why? because we have no interest in poland, latvia, or anywhere else. why would we do that? we simply don't have any interest into this, but it's just track mongering. well the argument, i know you notice is that well he invaded ukraine. she has territorial aims across the continent and you're saying unequivocally, you don't send,

you know, it's absolutely description of it is absolutely out of the question. you can, i mean, you just don't have to be any kind of analyst. it goes against common sense to get involved in some kind of a global war and the in the state. and i'm going and a global warbles bring all humanity to the brink of destruction. it's obvious. let's see. just curious to see they are certainly means of the insurance. they have been swearing every one with us, all along. tomorrow. russia will use tactical nuclear weapons tomorrow. russia will use that as you know, the day after tomorrow. so once we meet, you know, we will put each in order to extort additional money from us taxpayers and european tax payers in the confrontation with russia in the ukranian theater award. the goal is to weaken russia as much as possible. well,

one of our senior united states senators from the state of new york, chuck schumer said yesterday, i believe that we have to continue to fund the ukrainian efforts for us soldiers. citizens could wind up finding their how do you assess that? it's a, it's a better walk, let's. uh, this is a publication and a cheaper vacation at that end of the week. i do not understand why american soldiers should fight in ukraine. they are mercenaries from the united states. there was the bigger number of mercenaries comes from poland, with nursing aries from the united states, and 2nd place, and mercenaries from georgia in 3rd place. google sloan as well. if somebody has the desire to send regular troops, that would certainly bring humanity to the brink of a very serious global complex. this is obvious to do the united states

need. this is what for somebody to do with newsrooms and thousands of miles away from your national territory. they're going to need simple items. don't you have anything better to do? so if you have issues on the border issues with migration issues, with the national debt, more than $33.00 trillion dollars, you have nothing better to do so you should fight than you agree. when you mindshift, why don't you a couple of us good, wouldn't it be better to negotiate with the russian? make an agreement already understanding the situation that is developing today. realizing that russia will fight for its interest to the end, they're almost mostly and realizing this actually return to common sense and start respecting our country and its interest and look for a certain solutions. because yeah, it seems to me that this is much smarter and more rational. who blow up north stream you for sure. i was busy that

made it and you have to have uh, i did not pull up your delivery. uh, it takes you to know what's the coolest leech and what, what you said it was each that you personally may have an alibi, but the c a has no. so tell him i didn't. did you have evidence that nato and ca did a i need to know this. you know, i won't get into the details which people always say in such cases, to look for someone who is interested. but in this case, we should not only look for someone who is interested, but also for someone who has capabilities because they may be many people interested. but not all of them are capable of thinking through the bottom of the baltic sea and carrying out this explosion. and these 2 components should be connected into you. so who's interested and who's capable of doing?

but i'm confused. i mean, that's the biggest active industrial terrorism ever. and it's the largest emission of c o 2 in, in history. okay. so if you had evidence and presumably given your security services, rental services, you would, that nato, the u. s. c, i a, the west did this. why wouldn't you present it? and when a propaganda victory, when you put up identity, which is working in the war of propaganda, it is very difficult to defeat the united states. because the united states controls all the world's media and many european media, the ultimate beneficiary of the biggest european media, our american financial institutions. don't you know that? so it is possible to get involved in this work, but it is cost prohibitive, so to speak more than we can simply showing the spotlights on our sources of information. and we will not the cheat results that it is clear to the whole world

. what happened then? even american analysts talk about the directly. it's true. yeah. so, but here's the question you able to answer. you worked in germany. famously. the germans clearly know that there natal partner did this, but they and it damaged their economy greatly. it may never recover. why are they being silent about it? that's very confusing to me. why wouldn't the germans say something about it? a new system hits the unit and the so so it confuses me to. but today's german leadership is guided by the interest of the collect, the west rather than its national interest. otherwise, it is difficult to explain the logic of their action or inaction each, after all, who doesn't have only about north stream one, which was blown up and the north stream to was damaged. but 15 is safe and sound, the gas can be supplied to europe through germany does not open it. we're ready

please. again, when you're gonna have to wait till there's another round truth, poland called the amal europe, which also allows for large flo nolan has closed it, but poland pecks from the german hand. it receives money from the pen european funds, and germany is the main donor to the span of your paying funds. germany feeds poland to the certain extent. and they close their route to germany. why? i don't understand ukraine to which the germans supply weapons and give money to germany is the 2nd sponsor of the united states in terms of financial aid to ukraine. they are 2 gas rails through ukraine. they simply closed one route through training session, opened the 2nd route, then please get a gas from russia, greens. they do not open it. could you spell that much? why don't the german say, look guys, we give you money and weapons. open up the ball,

please let the gas from bruship pass. true for us. we're buying liquefied gas a exorbitant prices in europe, getting that improvement plan decision invest, which brings the level of our competitiveness and economy in general, down to 0. so do you want us to give you money? just simply let us have the decent existence they can make money for our economy because this isn't worth the money we give you comes from which you they refuse to do so why? it's as easy as that is what is like in their head. some, those are highly incompetent people. well, maybe the world is breaking into 2 hemispheres. one with cheap energy, the other without. and i want to ask you that if you for now multi polar world, obviously we are, can you describe the blocks of alliances who, who, who is in each side. do you think that's close to? let's go, they need to get a sense of listen, you have said that the world is breaking into 2 hemispheres. a human brain is

divided into 2 hemispheres. we'll see what we do. you can still be able to create one is responsible for one type of activity. the other one is more about creativity and so on would be the. but it is still one and the same head i shifted there will should be a single hole. security should be shared the rather than the meant for the golden 1000000000 to each of them. that is the only scenario where the world could be stable, sustainable, and predictable. until then, while they had to split into parts, it is an illness, a serious adverse condition because it is a period of severe disease that the world is going to now. but i think the thing so honest journalism of this work is i came to work at the doctors this could somehow be remedied. what, let's just give one example the, the us dollar, which has kind of united the world in a lot of ways, maybe not to your advantage, but certainly ours is that going away as the reserved currency to become the

universally accepted currency? how have sanctions do you think changed the dollars place in the world? it's a good piece of my is going to use just you know, so use the dollar as a tool a for and policy struggle is one of the biggest strategic mistakes made by the us political leadership rules. it's a small us move model. she's supposed to share to the dollar is the cornerstone of the united states bower. and i think everyone understands very well that no matter how many dollars are printed there quickly dispersed all over the world. i'm the president 15 and teach the student or the uh, the you mean with this issue? absolutely. inflation in the united states is minimal. it's about 3 or 3.4 percent, which is, i think, totally acceptable for the us. but they won't start printing it because the death

of $33.00 trillion dollars tell us about it is about the mission capital. good. let me go look at what's the pretty lady showing is because we're doing of quite you informed me on the never the less it is the main weapon used by the united states to preserve its malware across the world. as soon as the political leadership decided to use the us dollar as a tool of political struggle, a blow was dealt to this american power group. i would not like to use any strong language, but it is a stupid thing to do. and a great mistake. it's just more than just a pretty squared nation. i'd say it's great look at what is going on in the world. even the united states allies are now downsizing their dollar research. seeing this, everyone starts looking for ways to protect themselves. but the fact that the united states applies restricted measures to certain countries,

such as placing restrictions on transactions, freezing assets, etc, causes great concern and sends a signal to the whole world. not what i see within we have here until 2020, to about 80 percent of russian foreign trade transactions were made in us dollars and euro's it seems to them a legit to use dollars accounted for approximately 50 percent of our transactions with 3rd countries. well, currently it is down to 13 percent. it wasn't knows who banned the use of the us dollars to ship. things that issue. yeah. i can, i can get, you know, shot i shut the door. we had no such intention. it was decision of the united states to restrict our transactions and us dollars. i think it is complete formation is from the point of view of the interest of the united states itself and its taxpayers. as its damages,

the us economy undermines the power of the united states across the world by the way, our transactions and you are accounted for about 3 percent just h duty, but it's in today. 34 percent of our transactions are mated roubles, and a belt as much function a little over 34 percent and you on the gym single next step. why did the united states do this? my only guess is self can see. they probably thought that but really to full collapse but nothing to lapse. more over. other countries including oil producers, are thinking of and already accepting payments for oil. and you are as to, you even realize what is going on or not. what we met just does anyone in the united states realizing is interested in the next step? what are you doing? you were cutting yourself off. oh, experts say there's like some doors to see that ask any intelligent and thinking person in the united states,

what the dollar means for the us when you're killing it with your own hands. the way i think that's a fact that i think there's a fair assessment. the question is, what comes next page? and maybe you trade one colonial power for another much less sentimental and forgiving colonial power. i mean, or is the, the, the bricks for example, in danger? of being completely dominated by the chinese, the chinese economy in a way that's not good for their sovereignty. to worry about that. it, it, it just especially of we have heard those booby men stories. the 4th was it is a bu, game, and story where neighbors with china. because you cannot choose neighbors just as you can to choose close relatives. we share a border of 1000 kilometers with them. this is number one. second, we have a centuries long history of co existence where use to 3rd join us foreign policy

philosophy is not aggressive. its idea is to always look for compromise, and we can see that the most. the next point is as follows. we're always still the same book, human story. and here it goes again through an euphemistic form, but it is still the same book. human story. the cooperation with china keeps increasing the level of the base of which china cooperation with europe is growing, is higher and greater than that of the growth of chinese russian cooperation. especially if you ask your opinions on the freight they might be, i don't know yet, but they are still trying to access china as market at all costs, especially now that they are facing economic problems he could face the chinese businesses are also exploring the european market new chinese businesses of small presence in the united states. yes,

the political decisions are such that they are trying to limit their blah peroration with china. it's going to you. it is through your own detriment, mr. tucker, that you are limits in cooperation with china a little bit. you are hurting yourself. it is a delicate matter, and there are no silver bullet solutions just as it is with the dollars here. you. so before introducing any illegitimate sanctions, illegitimate in terms of the charter of the united nations. so one should think very carefully for decision makers, this appears to be a problem. so you said a moment ago that the world would be a lot better if it weren't broken into competing alliances. if there was cooperation globally, one of the reasons you don't have that is because the current american administration is dead set against you. do you think if there were a new administration after joe biden, that you would be able to re establish communication with the us government,

or does it not matter who the president is? just schedule the point, you know, show, but i will tell you, but let me finish the previous thoughts, a weight together with my colleague and friend, president g thing thing with set that goal to reach 200000000000 dollars of mutual trade with china. this year we have exceeded this level of this according to our fingers, our bilateral trade with china. so tools already 213000000000. and the chinese statistics says it is $240000000000.00, which is one more important thing. our trade is well balanced, mutually complimentary in height, sec, energy, scientific research and development. it is very balance which has for bricks wherever russia took over the presidency this year. the bricks, countries are by and large, developing very rapidly. look,

if memory serves me right back in 1992, the share of the g 7 countries in the world economy amounted to 47 percent equipment. whereas in 2022 it was down to i think, a little over 30 percent. you gotta way community to assist the yellow the bricks. countries accounted for only 16 percent in 1992. but now their share is greater than that of the g 7 that it has nothing to do with the events in ukraine. this is due to the trends of global development and world accounting. me, as i mentioned just now, and this is inevitable. this will keep happening. it is like the rise of the sun. you cannot prevent the sun from rising. you have to adapt to it. you said we can, how do the united states with them, with the help of force like sanctions, pressure, bomb bangs,

and use of armed forces. this is about self conceits here, but with the goal is stablish ment does not understand that the world is changing from under objective circumstances. and in order to preserve your level, even if someone aspires pardon me to the level of dominance, you have to make the right decisions in the competence and timely manner. such brutal actions including with regard to russia and say, other countries are counter productive. this is an obvious fact, it has already become evidence of a. so could i need. so what do you think? you just asked me if another leader comes and changes something. it is not about the leader. it is not about the personality of a particular person. if i had the very good relationship with the say, bush, i know that in the united states, he was portray this some kind of a country boy who does not understand what you should know,

but i assure you that this is not the case. i think he made a lot of mistakes with regard to russia to the bottom. i told you about 2008, then the decision in bucharest to open the nato's doors to for ukraine and so on. that happened during his presidency. he actually exercised pressure on the europeans, but in general, on the personal human level, i had a very good relationship with him. he was no worse than any other american or russian or european politician. i assure you he understood what he was doing as well as others. you might have such a personal relationship with trump as well because it is not about the personality of the leader. it is about the lease mindset. you must stay in your if the idea of domination at any cost based also on forceful actions dominates the

american society. nothing will change. it will only get worse than usual. but if in the end one comes to the awareness that the world has been changing to the objective circumstances and the other one should be able to adapt to them can time is using the advantages that the us still has today. and perhaps something may change, a lot of money to join us economy has become the 1st economy in the world and purchasing power parity in terms of volume. it's over to the us a long time ago. the usa comes 2nd then in the one and a half 1000000000 people. and then japan with russia in the 5th place, still a rush. it was the 1st account i mean in europe last year despite all the sanctions and restrictions, or is it normal from your point of view, sanctions restrictions to impossibility of payments in dollars being cut off from

swift services such as the sanctions against our ships carrying oil company sanctions against airplanes, somebody sanctions in everything everywhere. and we make sure that goes to something unique that the news is, the largest number are sanctions in the world which are applied are applied against russia. and we have become europe's 1st economy during this time. no, no that's about doing with the tools that us use is don't work with. well, one has to think about what to do. if this realization comes to the reading and leads then yes. then the 1st person of the state will act in anticipation of what the voters and the people who make decisions at various levels expect from this person. then maybe something will change. but you're describing 2 different systems . you say that the leader acts in the interest of the voters, but you also say these decisions are not made by the leader they're made by the ruling classes. you've run this country for so long, you know,

and all these americans.