is sure, but you already said it, i didn't think you meant it isn't insulting. as you already said correctly. it's been reported that ukraine was prevented from negotiating a peace settlement by the former british prime minister, acting on behalf of the binding ministrations of course, or satellite. the countries control small countries that's not new. and that's why i asked about dealing directly with the binding ministration, which is making these decisions not as presence a wednesday of crane or used to mistrust agent is going on. cutting of cars also be to go or yep. stuff. well, if there's a lensky administration in ukraine refused to negotiate. i assume they did it under the instruction from a washing machine, washington to leave, so it should be the wrong decision and even the let it amending it, let it find a delicate excuse so that no one is in. so let it come up with the way out with a new thing with because it was not us who made this decision, it was them to. so let them go back home and if i needed to that is the only one

who does it to me for an edition. however, they made the wrong decision, and now we have to look for way out of the situation. so correct, there is a problem. they did it, so let them correct in themselves. we support this. so i just wanna make sure i'm not misunderstanding what you're saying. i don't think that i am. i think you're saying you want a negotiated settlement to what's happening in your credit, you know, right? so this is at the and we made it, we prepared the huge document that is stumble. that was initialed by the heads of your domain names over the issue and he had fixed his signature to some of the provisions. i'm not so all of it they, he put a signature and then he himself said, we were ready to sign it and the where would it be over a long ago? would you have 3 months to go to my numbers, however, prime minister johnson, can you talk to is out of it and with misled chances? well, you missed it. she made a mistake,

receiving just let them get back to them. that's it. that is all. why do we have to bother ourselves and correct somebody else's mistakes? no one can say it is our mistake in what it was us, who osh, intensified the situation and decided that it was an end to the war and then started to think 2014 and done. but as i have already said by means of weapons and then the with me good maximum, you know further in history, i already told you of us going on with furniture. we were just discussing the room . let us go back to 1991 when we were promised that nato would not expand issue with one to 2008. when the doors tonight to oakland, say that the declaration of state sovereignty of the crane declaring ukraine, a neutral state amongst the let us go back to the fact that nato and us military bases and we started to appear on the territory. ukraine. reading threats to a hosting issue and let us go back to the crew to tell in ukraine in 2014 is

missing the problem. it is pointless though, isn't it? when they go back and forth endlessly, but they stops negotiations. ship, is it a mistake? you spell? yes. correct it, my god, we're ready. what else is needed? do you think it's 2 humiliating at this point for nato to accept russian control of what was 2 years ago? ukrainian territory or right? yes. yes, because now i said, so let them think how to do it with thickness, being your, their options, if there is a will randy's nature cuz there's really up until now there is being the uproar and screaming a bell to inflict thing is strategic defeat the russia on the non don't fail each scope. i don't think that i see, but as being and now they are apparently coming to realize that it is difficult to achieve safe if possible at all. i'm in my opinion. it is impossible, by definition. it is never going to happen when it comes to show. it seems to me

that now those who are in power in the west have come to realize this as well. that's of any additional. but if so, if the realization has set and they have to think what to do next or we're ready for this dialogue, would you be willing to say, congratulations, nato, you one and just keep the situation where it is now? no, it was not just the big mit big. a lot of you know it is a subject matter for the negotiations. no one is willing to conduct or support it more accurately. fishing is cuz i do. yeah. they're willing. yeah. but do you not know how to do it yet? and i know they want certain life. it is not just i see and, but i know they do want that they're struggling to understand how to do it. they have driven the situation to the point where we are at it is not us who have done

that. it is our partners for opponents who have done with that. well, now they've been saying how to reverse the situation. we're not against it. it would be funny if it were not so sad and then move little this makes nicely when you will good this endless mobilization and ukraine. the hysteria then domestic problems, sooner or later it will result in agreement is to you to get them know thing you, but you know, this probably sounds strange given the current situation. so i don't know the names e, but the relations between the 2 peoples will be rebuilt anyway. we just mentioned to us it was which it will take a lot of time, but they will have, uh no, that'll be most them. but they would some degree me, i'll give you very unusual examples. so she and there's one. yeah, yeah. unfortunately, payment, there is a combat thing counter on the world here, specific example, ukrainian soldiers, government circled,

and this is an example from real life cranes. car soldiers were shouting to them and there is no chance. surrender of yourselves come out and you will be alive. and that sort of thing. could you suddenly the cranium soldiers were squealing like from there in russian. perfect russian saying they've got to russians, do not surrender competitor from those. and all of them parish things they use they still identify themselves as russian but hosting these issues that issue with them . so let's get test of what is happening is through a certain extent and element of a civil war. you see everyone in the west, things that the russian people have been slid by, his snails lives forever. and especially now they will be re united. yeah, they unit, the is still there will see you in your birthday to you cause why are the ukranian authorities dismantling the ukrainian orthodox church of cooper or something?

which is because it brings together and not only the territory i need to do, it brings together ourselves no one will be able to separate the so shall we end here or is there anything else? so i think that's great. thank you. this person you've been watching the highly anticipated interview with the russians. laudermill approaching the president of russia by american news, has to talk a costs and the 2 hour long interview will cover the various topics including the war and ukraine. what led to age and the role played by the collective wise to profit which president put a note at the 2014 coo and ukraine as a refusal to implement the means. government played a key role including nato's military activities at its border and plans to accept

a crane inter nato, about a few provocations by the west. let's discuss this further with our correspondence during a quarter. thank you so much for joining us. what are the highlights of this interview for you? well, i mean, there was really a wide array of topics that were discussed, of course. so i think it's safe to say that it mostly focused on the ukraine conflict. specifically, russia's perspective on why this stuff happened because i have to say 1st, i've been following this uh, the tucker call since visit to russia, since it became known based on pictures, published on social media that he was in moscow. and in the video that he published confirming that he was going to be doing an interview with vladimir put. and he said that the purpose of it was to inform the american people about the reasons for why russia launched its military operation. something that the american people, unfortunately, on the whole, have not been informed of because of the way the main stream media has shape this narrative. so this interview is very important because it is offered the russian

president to provide a brought clean and cut russian perspective to the american public. so they can see for themselves this perspective. um and uh if, if we want to start with the actual ukraine conflicts, there's a lot of things that the russian president went over all the way going back to the history of ukraine, the history of russia, the fact that they share a common history listen tend uh, the facts that the west has uh, basically for a long time tried to artificially divide the peoples of these 2 countries. but of course, if we're talking about the, if we're starting from 2014, when the euro might don crude a ton, ukraine took place, which a lot of our put and spoke at length about. he said that it was supported by the c . i a that the united states used of force to basically over throw the democratically elected president down a coal,

which at the time of the country using neo nazi elements and society put and went over that. and, you know, he also said that you're on a cold, which was ready to hold early election. so why even support a cru dates on the 1st place is another thing that vladimir put mentioned about the events of 2014 and it kind of, i guess you could say set a precedent for the rest of the way. but this is a situation began to develop because the russian president also spoke with tucker carlson a lot about each uminski agreements that were suppose to us now that right, they were supposed to establish a cease fire in done boss after the um, uh, hostilities broke out between the key of regime and the look on some people's republic, financial depos republic that broke away from ukraine to not be part of this new nazi administration. and the, the main points that the russian president talked about. and you were the fact that the was the piece for an administration in key of had no actual desire to abide by

these agreements. they didn't like it from the beginning and the west that it, you know, many western powers. it signed off with the leadership reprint of the time on these mince pie agreements. uh, some leaders, specifically, the former ukranian president porter shank. go admitted that these men ski agreements were just to buy time to prepare for a war with russia. we also heard the same thing echoed by this is a former german chancellor. um aguilar merkel later on. so this is kind of what vladimir put in was talking about that these ministry agreements were really not conducted in good faith and key of even later openly admitted that it would not abide by these protocols. and it began to prepare for an offensive. and that's exactly what the russian president said, basically was the straw that broke the camel's back in terms of russia deciding to launch the military operation. the less quite interesting, when you said the, the last straw was, you know, the lack of the implementation of

a mist means agreement. president put and also say that, you know, when the, he was a start collapsed, it was agreed that russia's border would be around. it's full, martin, junior and republics, and a lot of that has changed. you want to speak to that? yeah, well the russian president also spoke a lot about the fact that they were promised, you know, that nato would not move farther eastward in the either late 80, the late eighty's early ninety's. i don't remember exactly, but um, this is obviously something that nato has not abided by spending 5 time. right? exactly. it's expanded 5 times since it's a 5 waves of expansion. since we've gotten to this point where ukraine and georgia as the russian president said in this interview, who are essentially in danger. well, obviously this colored revolution happened in 2014 and ukraine. and georgia has

long been under threat of having its own cover color revolution as well funded by, you know, western powers, specifically the united states. so, obviously, nato expansion continued. and even when the, in the months that preceded the launching of the russian, a special military operation, ukraine, russia was hard at work for months trying to make the minister agreements work. trying to discuss with the west, with the west, with washington to make sure that they have a guarantee that ukraine is not going to become a part of nato. and their response was continuously that we're not going to make any guarantee like that. if, if need, if we decide that, you know, nato wants to become part of nato, are sorry, that ukraine wants to become part of nato. then you know, that's how it's going to be. and this is just a red line that mosque out made clear for the longest time. and now we're in this situations where this obviously military operation has been drawn out for about 2

years already. and we have to understand why it's not able to be concluded at this point because one of the main parts of this interview, and i think one of the most important parts of the russian president has said something that he said many times before. but obviously it doesn't get to the american public that russia has been trying to negotiate a peace settlement for the longest time and its ukraine that has rejected this is the landscape has made it illegal even have negotiations with russia. and it's got interest in present. putting still said that he is still willing to negotiate. isn't that something is saying that if, if the reach out that the door is open, the door of negotiation is not completely closed. and that's if zalinski wants that it was the question the cost and asked him, you said, have you achieved to ames and, and ukraine, you know?

and then he said, not really because we need something that's a 5 you create and cost me. it was trying to ask him what he meant by like, what do you think he was referring to smell? vladimir putting a says in the interview. we actually, um, he explains, i think, uh the, you know, the concept of did not suffocation very well. the fact that in ukraine there is, you know, watermark put and explains their neo nazis all over the world. but in ukraine there's a very specific situation where this sort of neo nazi ideology is ingrained in the establishment right. there are historical figures and ukrainian history. the collaborated with the nazis during world war 2 that have statute was built after them and in, in their name and ukraine, their hailed us heroes. and this is basically the guiding ideology of the, um, so if you ever seen that emerged out of the 2014 uh, 2 dates on your, on my don. and this is what a sensually brought them or put in a said means buy,

did not buy donuts vacation, removing this institutionalized, neo nazi ideology in ukrainian society. and like you said, the black one we're putting said that unfortunately the goals of the special military operation. so far have not been accomplished. uh, and one of the things that i'd like to take a look at actually is where he mentions. uh, well, one of the reasons why and is the prolongation of this conflict as a result of basically on ending flow of western weapons being sent to ukraine. let's take a listen to what the russian president says this. this lets you, what is it the uh, searching of what's there to work out? it's very simple. i repeat just this concept of putting it on medication. we have contacts through various agencies, around schedule, something going that i will tell you what we are saying on this matter and what we're conveying to the us leadership. we, if you really want to stop fighting,

you need to stop supplying weapons. it will be over within a few weeks. that's it. and then we can agree on some terms before you do that, to stop what's easier. why would they call in a lot? that's pretty interesting too. he also said, as i was coughing, i was asking him about the status of a dollar and how the world is basically now a to different camps. it was an interesting analogy to the president to explain about the brand, even though it is divided into 2. it is still sort of working together, and one of the us to take a cue from that at the top goes through their knowledge. right? well, if it's even in itself, really connected to the frame conflict as well, because so i think it's safe to say that it's a dave, a real impetus to the development of the multi polar world that the vladimir put and was talking about when he was talking about the decline of dollar dominance as well because he brings up a lot of different things that i'll go over in

a 2nd. but he says that it's out right after the tucker carlson assets. what am i putting about dollar dominance. he says that as soon as the us leadership decided to use the dollar as a weapon, it damaged the united states power around the world. and we're seeing sort of the social consequences of that in the economic outcomes of. it's like the russian present went over the fact that many dis, well, producers are turning away from the dollar. they're going towards the u on, we're seeing the emergence of bricks, bricks, economies. the russian president brought attention to the point that the share of global g d. p of the g 7 countries has been steadily decreasing over the years. and the share of global g. p of rich countries has been on the right hands to minutes to essentially what vladimir putin said is that this rise of the multi polar world of the brakes block. this is something that's inevitable. he said that it's as

inevitable as the sun rising. it's something left to adapt to it. let's take a listen to that part where he talks about that and put on the viola. the bricks. countries accounted for only 16 percent in 1992. but now their share is greater than that of the g 7. that it has nothing to do with the events in ukraine. this is due to the trends of global development and world economy, as i mentioned just now. and this is an image symbol. this will keep happening. it is like the rise of the sun. you cannot prevent the sun from rising. you have to adapt to it. you said we can. how do the united states of them with the help of force, sanctions, pressure, bomb bangs, and use of armed forces? interesting. yeah, there were and, and after that there were another 2 moments that i think i could, i think it's safe to say were very interesting. and i'd like to go over a tucker,

carlson asked the russian president. and this is the kind of question that to be honest, i don't think uh in the western media. it's talked about that much, but tucker carlson. ask lot of are putting what, what does it, what does it mean to be an orthodox christian leader of the country? right? because obviously nobody has vladimir put in is made quite clear that russian orthodoxy is part of the russian identity and potent spoke a lot about russia's history, historical relation to religion. actually, the fact that it has a track record of being a country with many different religions and a track record of having tolerance towards people who profess different religions really. because the, the common factor of people who professed different religions in russia is that they have one mother land, which is russia. and they are all kind of united by a traditional values as the russian president said. and this is what allows society

to function correctly. and to continue and it's a and it's development essentially. and the 2nd part, so i think is important is the information was something that came up for a 2nd. obviously because we're here working as journalists at the rest of today. because he was asked about, as you know, is that the way russia has been trying to come back to us propaganda. right. and the russian president responded by saying it's very difficult to defend us propaganda because they basically have more or less monopoly on global information . and all that we can do really is try to shed light on the truth as much as possible, which of course, that's something we're trying to do here in the rest of the day. that was very, very poignant, actually. thank you so much. we're gonna have to leave it. they are to correspondent on a quarter. thank you for speaking to us. so let's stick you live now to jackson, the hang co political analyst, and the host of the dive with jackson,

who can go. thank you so much for joining us. i'm going to start with what you make of talk a causes interview with pressed important. what were the most member particular ways for you as well? i thought it was incredible. it's also worth noting that you as president joe biden is currently speaking on the white house lawn, trying to explain away his mental health decline issues as we just got a 2 hour lecture from president, or maybe even professor boot and thinking about geo political history. and the future of the multi polar world. i think the biggest takeaways from this conversation, and it's exactly what tucker set out to do was to show the western worlds that nato and the west are the ones provoking this english warfare against the russian federation. and that, despite that fact that the tutoring and the russians have made every single attempt

possible to bring about peace, prudent brought up, of course, when he 1st came into office, the issues in the caucus is in the us financing the terrors, separate as they're cute and brought up later, of course the issues surrounding the middle lease. he brought up, you know, looking at ukraine, the 2004 orange revolution with you on a co which and that's a piece of history that is often overlooked. the brought up the 2014 us who and the failure to implement the men's good chords. and even more recently, the efforts that were led by boris johnson in the united states to terminates the peace proposal that was almost signed by ukraine and russia in east symbol regarding bringing it into the war and ukraine. so overall, great conversation, and i think it provided a very in depth analysis to what the truth of these events really are for an audience that may not have been previously aware. why do you think this visit by

costing to russia has drawn so much attention? well, it's quite simple this, this visit from tucker carlson, put it put the final nail in the coffin for the western press, the main stream media of the fake news which is financed by mega, corporate corporations, international monopolies, the military industrial complex, big pharma. they understood that for the 1st time there's going to be an avenue for the truth to get out to the world that isn't going to be inflamed by this for cancer is corporate, global is veneer. that's the mainstream media so often applies to any conversation that they publish. so tucker carlson toys is a unique for the read not only because of the truth that this interview was going to inevitably bring to the masses, but also because of the reach it. it is going to have, i mean,

already millions of views and his announcement video for this interview alone got a 100000000 views on twitter. so they're very fearful in the global as establishment. and i'd say with good reason, water and 14 began to interfere with the historical overview on the origins of russia and ukraine. and it was a pretty long one. why do you think he was so eager to share this and to educate the rest of the world about how it's 2 countries getting about as well? i think it's very important to understand what is actually happened and tucker himself even seemed may be a little bit surprised to learn about the history of hungry and ukraine as well, which i find that region of ukraine has been targeted heavily by refraining authorities for conscription. efforts for the ukraine war because of the hon. gary and authorities approach to trying to bring about an end to this war and stopping the sanctions against russia. and at the end of the day, what the, the west fails to comprehend. and when i say the west,

the global is ruling elite is that this territory, historically, especially the november c, a region is russian territory. and it is not a territory that should be governed or dictated by the united states, which is what we've seen for so many years now leading up to february of 2022. i think with that in mind, you can understand and fully appreciate that the people here would rather live under a rushing rule, or at least in unison and peace with russia. and they simply could not do that when their governments that they were electing was being violently overthrown by the united states and their proxies during the interview put and revealed some details of the data with the full lot us president bill clinton on nature membership for russia saying that president clinton clinton initially expressed interest, but then later rejected the idea. why do you think the situation played out like a bit? i think that the us authorities knew that russia was

a massive country with uh, you know, a deep culture that they would fight to protect. i think that they understood that russia's economy was slated to grow up by increasing psalms each and every year. and also that boots and actually wanted to preserve global peace, even early on in his presidency. that of course, is not the aims of the us ruling class who funds their campaigns in their lives as life styles by promoting english wars like the one we're witnessing and ukraine right now. so, for uprooting to join something like nato, with a country, a military, and a people as strong as russia has, would be a massive hurdle and a roadblock to the aims of the us. deep state to continue this imperialist world order rather than bring about the peaceful integration of all people. talking about

brick spirit and said quote to you kept stop the sun from rising nursing. the brakes is a significant part of world economy and is now larger than the g 70 economies. what does it take and why the russian president reached this point as well? i think it's a very important point to raise for people in the west average americans in particular, because frankly, we don't hear about this in the press. americans still believe that the united states is the sole loan economic superpower. and nothing can be done about that. and also brought up the very important points that china is purchasing power parity has far surpassed. united states is that russia is the top economy in europe and also when he didn't bring up. but i also find interesting is that russia is the 5th largest economy in the world. when you look at those facts and also look at how

transformative this moment truly is for the breaks grouping most uh for the ceo. for these alternate id, economic models that are really beginning to flourish, to begin to understand that the united states isn't a much weaker economic point. then the officials in washington or their proxies in the media leads the public on to belief. and when you understand that, you understand that, hey, maybe war isn't the answer. maybe we should be pushing for piece cooperation. and when, when uh, you know, trade in bilateral, you know, agreements with countries like russia and china, are talking about the media, american tv channels, fox news, and cnn. and for face to mentioned, coughing on at face interview with tutoring. came to light instead of focusing on biden's papers and using these resignation. why do you think that he was mainstream media is refusing to acknowledge the interview?

because john kirby told them not to talk about it, john kirby. he told the american public not to listen to this interview with vladimir putin, which i just find insane because the liberal establishment media, his interview, proved in many times before. of course, with this uh, the of this, this facade of sincerity. but in actuality, what they were doing was a deep state political head job against boot in, in the russian federation and the mainstream media in the united states. also right here, really props up interviews with on savory actors and pass vice news is interviewed isis and al qaeda soon, which they regularly interview is really officials. but for some reason they don't want. so the world they hear tucker calls and interview vladimir putin because tucker calls and gives a plane in rational take on the ukraine war. there is no reason why we should be funding it. there's no reason why we should be involved. and there's definitely no

.