[000:00:00;00] the, the lot them importing discusses the future of the world in his much anticipated interview that has already been viewed by millions online. the russian president says a shift in the global balance of power is under way. it has nothing to do with the events in ukraine. this is due to the trends of global development and world account. and me, as i mentioned just now, and this is an image symbol, this will keep happening. it is like the rise of the sun. but you cannot prevent the sun from rising the, you're watching our to international blogs from us go. i'm

a day show. our josh top stores this our new pritchens 1st interview with a western jung list. since 2021 has already been viewed by tens of millions online . the, to our long conversation covered various topics including the war and ukraine. what led to it? and the role played by the collective west to perpetrated, dr. costing, press the russian president on whether there was room for dialogue between russia and nato. jude, it gets to humiliating at this point for nato to accept russian control of what was 2 years ago. ukrainian territory. right, yeah, yeah, no, i said, so let then thing how to do it with thickness. think your, there are options if there is a will a van to use music cuz there's like up until now there is being the uproar and screaming. ability inflict thing is strategic defeat the russia on the system, each scope butters,

and yet i see pressuring and now they are apparently coming to realize that it is difficult to achieve if possible, at all. in my opinion, i think it is impossible, by definition, it is never going to happen. so it seems to me that's now those who are in power in the west have come to realize this as well. that's other than your visual. but if so, if the realization has set in, they have to think what to do next to we're ready for this dialogue and let's discuss the slides now without correspondent or not quarter. thank you so much for joining us. what with the highlights of this interview for you? well, the interview covered a wide array of topics, but it began with a pretty thorough history less than uh, regarding the common history, the common economics and the common face that both russia and ukraine share. but of course, the main thrust of the discussion was on the ukraine conflict itself. we heard

vladimir put in speaker, quite a blinks about the euro might on coup d'etat that took place in 2014. he said that this was sponsored by the c. i, a, we heard about the men's protocols and tucker also asked the russian president about the prospects for peace negotiations to which the russian president responded . and rather i might say, reiterated, because this is something that he said time and time again. the moscow is ready and has long been ready for peace negotiations, but this conflicts can come to an end very quickly. if the west just puts an ends to it's supplying. it's a key of, of weapons without end. let's take a list, a luxury. what is it that oh, searching she what's there to work out? it's very simple. i repeat just this concept of putting it on medication. we have contacts through various agencies, going schedule. if someone going that i will tell you what we're saying on this matter and what we're conveying to the u. s. leadership. wait week, if you really want to stop fighting,

you need to stop supplying weapons is it will be over within a few weeks. the that's the end, then we can agree on some terms. before you do that, we stop showing you what's easier. why would i call? and now, another important thing that came up in this interview tucker asked vladimir putin, what was the possibility of russia perhaps attacking the european countries? specifically, poland was mentioned in lot of our proven answered that there, there would be no situation in which russia were the tax, their european country, unless they were to, unless russia was attacked 1st. what does he have to say about the direction? all the changes taking place in the world right now. well, according to putting, he spoke a lot about the, the us dollar dollarization, the decline of the dollar gemini, and according to food. and he said that probably the thing that did the most damage

was when the us leadership decided to use the dollar as an economic weapon. that's basically that marks the beginning of the decline of the dollar. so germany around the world, we're seeing countries um that by hoyle, moving from the dollar to the one we're seeing the steady decline of the global share of gdp of g 7 countries and the the steady rise of the influence, the economic influence around the world of the global south, as well as the bricks economic block. and this is something that the russian president said is as inevitable as the right of as the way the sun rises in the morning was suggesting what he said, the yellow bricks country is accounted for. only 16 percent in 1992, but now their share is greater than that of the g 7. it has nothing to do with the events in ukraine. this is due to the trends of global development and world accounting. me,

as i mentioned just now. and this is an image symbol. this will keep happening. it is like the rise of the sun. you cannot prevent the sun from rising. you have to adapt to it. you said, how do the united states to them as soon as meeting with the help of force, like sanctions, pressure bombings, and use of armed forces. now of course, uh as we talk about the rise of nations outside of western europe and the north atlantic continent. of course, china is a big point of discussion. and this was mentioned in the interview as well. talk across and as a lot of our put, and if he was worried about the rise of the economic rise and the political influential rise of china on the global stage. and what her point said, there was nothing to worry about. because china and russia both enjoy long standing uh good relations and they have a partnership based on when, when cooperation. but a lot of our put and did say that the west is more worried about

a strong china then a strong rush out of a on here to highlight you picked up on. yeah, the other main thing that was spoken about had to do with the north stream pipeline sabotage is, 1st of all, obviously a lot of our put and when he was asked who he thought carried out these sabotaged us. he said, of course, the united states and he also talked about the damage it had on the german economy and talked about the fact that despite that, despite the fact that the primary suspect here is the united states, the german government did not offer any criticism in that direction then, the russian president said back to be attributed to the fact that it's already is in berlin, are more interested in representing the interests of the collective west under the leadership of washington rather than its own national interest. so let's take a quick listen to what they discussed. a full blow up north stream for

you for sure. i was busy that day. i need it and you have to have a i just uploaded or what are you shipping? of course it was each and how much would you say it was each that you personally may have an alibi, but the c a has no. so tell him i didn't do. do you have evidence that nato or did it? um it, you know, you know, i won't get into the details which people always say in such cases, to look for someone who is interested in this case. we should not only look for someone who is interested, but also for someone who has capabilities because they may be many people interested, but not all of them are capable of thinking through the bottom of the baltic sea and carrying out this explosion. and these 2 components, should me connect those into this, always interested in who he's capable of doing, but i'm confused. i mean, that's the biggest acura industrial terrorism ever. and it's the largest emission of c o 2 in, in history. okay. so if you had evidence and presumably given your security

services, rental services, you would that nato, the u. s. c, i a, the west did this. why wouldn't you present it? and when a propaganda victory, when you pull up a gun that was just looking for the indoor of propaganda. it is very difficult to defeat united states because the united states controls all the world's media in many european media. the ultimate beneficiary of the biggest to europe and media are american financial institutions. oh, don't you know that so it is possible to get involved in this work, but it is cost prohibitive, so to speak. we can simply showing the spotlights on our sources of information, and we will not that you results staying on the subject that we just heard in that clip of the had gemini, that the united states basically has on global media and the difficulty of challenging american propaganda because of that,

i think it's important to understand that in this a 2 hour premiere of this interview, where the russian president is giving the raul on cut russian perspective on these events, we saw over 20000000 people watching on twitter alone. so that's not even counting tucker crossings, personal website, or other platforms where this interview could be viewed, or how many people are going to be watching in the future as well. so on that subject, i would say that this is really a victory for um, you know, in the isn't the information that can challenge mainstream narratives when it comes to russia. very valid points, right? that, thank you our, to correspondent on a quarter. thank you so much. let's cross live across life now to our to contribute our call job. what did you make of tuckers interview with president clinton and what were the most? the member bo ticket ways for you. i think that was great. you uh,

president food and headed out of the ballpark. and the is the most important thing about target costs and interviews. is that the gift to platform, to present, put in to actually voice, articulate his thoughts of much trust relationship with the world, particularly, which be noted, stays with the current conflict ongoing in ukraine. these are the points that's rarely reported on, you know, west or mainstream media yet. we've talked to carlos and now i'm posting this interview on his own independent blackboard. now we have a 20000000 people viewing it in just while hours after he's being released these, these, this now president boynton is speaking directly to a american audience. the anglo full audience about not only russian history, but the reason for the special military operation. the gray and why united states should you that you're getting into fear. i mean, he made a great point about you have plenty of problems at home,

don't you have better things to do? you have a problem with the border. you have 37 trillion dollars in dad y, which you, you really want to send your troops thousands miles away from home to fight ruptured and ukraine. that's ridiculous. i think that's very persuasive point. and, and another point he made out is about a gemini, because tucker carlson asked the question, what should be worry about being placing one colonial empire who is another was reference to china. of course, this is a projection following the america mentality that everyone, they, the american face that useem pyre is a, nor is that everyone should aspire to be like american hedge them on. so the only reasonable of pollution from that is anyone want to replace united states to be the hedge my, which to me directly point out there,

russia and china has to be neighbors for centuries. they the to know how to co is co exist with each other. the problem is really the america mentality of the gym. indeed of dominance. and in this changing world, it's the america mentality that must change to adapt to it because the world is changing, just like this song is rising in the east. it's view, you have to learn how to accept it as a fact. and i think these are some of the things that american audience should ponder, present important, explain the historical context behind the relationship between russia and ukraine over the centuries. and it stated, aim to denounce a fi you cream. basically, how do you think this will be perceived by view as in the west? well, what part of it did actually did a great job succeeds, succinctly, summarize the history of russia and it's eastern. it's the european borders within

25 minutes. the 1st 25 minutes of the interview, i have a feeling this information is rarely covered and rarely convey to the american audience. merican consumer of news, i mean the, i expect to be a huge backlash in the mainstream media, but yet the people who are watching on either on x or tucker carlson own website, they will be educated for the 1st time to that file text for the current conflict in ukraine, which is, you know, the main mainstream media in the west often presume everything happened on february 2022, which is not the case. it wouldn't quickly point that out. there is a long history you bring as a state was only created under sylvia union. and the war actually started in 2014 and ended russia. russia, especially a military operation,

is an attempt to bend the conflict beginning in 2014. the russian president also touched on the strong ties. russia has with neighboring china while suggesting that the you as aims to break rusher off and absolve it for what the west seas as a coming conflict with the people's republic. what is your take on his choice of what? well, i mean, the president put in minutes no worries. this is a fact. that's why we understood not just in rush up by the, in china as well. this is why when washington and all it's all the pundits, are screaming at china for why they're not jumping on the russian sanction bandwagon. the chinese leadership understood perfectly that the ultimate aim of the west and nato alliance after they, they go. they own breaking up brush, it wouldn't be china, china would be the next target. why would china, how that the so called click the less on accomplishing there, and that's, that's just ridiculous. and so, so this is, this will,

this also explains the ever increasing bombs between russia and china in the face of the continual hostility coming from the us. let west lot of important says the global violence of part is changing with the west. on the one hand, seeking to divide and conquer, while russia and other like minded nations are sticking to collaborate and support piece. how does that message resume, given events unfolding around the world today? the bottom, the tucker carlson, actually ask a very important why said he. so it looks like the world is being increasingly divided into 2 blocks. and is he asked present food and what he thinks of it? and i think the president put in, put a very succinctly, that the, with the human brain might be divided into 2 of them. it's fear that the 2 hemisphere must be able to communicate full for the human brain to function is

actually a sickness for the world to be divided into blocks. and again, this is not the wish of this, the brakes to be divided found to wes. this is an attempt that's a driven typically by the lead from washington and, and present brittany is making that case directly to the american people's, through this interview. i think this, people are understanding that this is the decision that's being made for. so call us at gemini, and it does, diamond is through the flow is made to serve and very special, very small selective circle of people not, not necessarily for the goods of say, the working class americans, americans even try that was fox news and cnn refused to mention coughing on air after his interview with button came to light instead, focusing on biden's papers, ends, illusion these resignation. why do you think that he was venturing media is refusing to acknowledge the interview? well, 1st of all,

thoughts fired percent tucker carlson. and i think that that's actually the greatest thing that ever happened to tuckers career, because now he has a much broader audience. people are getting sick and tired of the mainstream. narratives that's being force fed the shop under everybody's throw. people are hungry for real news and this, this interview. i mean, you really, i, this, this interview is something that the western journalist should have been doing all along, but yet that the habits. so is it. so again, this is a, it just shows that the, the mainstream media, they're losing their crypt both on construction, the narrative, and the ways to influenced the public during the interview also put in revealed is dialogue with former us president bill clinton on nato membership for russia saying that president clinton initially expressed interest, but then later rejected the idea. why do you think the situation played out the way that?

and it's very interesting uh the way present food and has describe how you went down what it sounds like to most of the less the nurse, i'm sure is that even a president of the united states is not the ultimate decision maker. because bill clinton said yes to check with the people, and in the end you come back to point and says, sorry, can be done at this moment. this is not the only instance. do you know what present food and also mation the instance about the anti ballistic missile defense pack that he tried to create with the, with united states. again, it's america, president, wizard clinton or bush. they all initially receptive. yeah. when they come back after consulting was for them for their people, the officer is always know. so it looks like the american president may not be the one that's actually running the show here. and so who can actually answer

a great question that post by tucker is that we didn't make a difference if a different leadership of some to tolerate in washington and, and putting pointed out it's really some and talented of american hegemony and dominance over the world that needs to change if that's not changed, you know, school as soon as seen himself, it was a different changing american president in the and the policy remain the same in the 2 hours since the interview was published on top of coffins x, twitter, formerly twitter, it has generated more than $20000000.00 views. what do you make of this vigor as well? it's one thing, it tells me that people are hungry for real use. you know, the people are to see lucian. where is the mainstream media is this is not a secret, this is why the news legacy news is dying literally dying. the average of viewership

of seeing and today is over 65 years old. their audience is literally dying. people are going elsewhere for news and ex provided excellent platform. um, you provided a platform for solid like tucked through the boston to be able to interview president bruton on his own without without the artificially constructed mainstream narrative narrative that everybody is so sick and tired of the news that the coffin visited. moscow went viral on social media with some liberal use of suggesting the gentleness should be banned from returning home. how does that fate with washington is due to, to uphold the bill of rights? i mean that that's just very ironic because you know, it's the don't, the journalist should be prosecuted for doing his job. i mean, why wouldn't you want to hear the other side of the story? this is a basic of journalism one. 0 one. yeah. right now,

the people who espouse the idea of freedom of speech to actually believe it, they don't actually believe there should be freedom of speech fall of the people that despise or from there. it's some of those the supposedly fast, supposedly any b s. the fact is, yours is not even. i've worked with russia. why is, why can anyone talked to prop pressed and put in for that matter, us has not clear where was rush. a rush is not even the official enemy rush of united it is waging a proxy war. can you? right? so what it is, there's really no reason for this accusation of trees and throwing a wrong except to shut down the descent. and that is important because they think they try to shut descent through any channels list their own uh, this own mainstream. a narrative about american history, many over the world collapse in from the audience. all right,

then our to contribute our calls out. thank you so much for speaking to archie international will stay tuned for the 1st part of a viral interview with vladimir putin, which will air in a few hours from now. you can already watch dr. costs in full conversation with the russian president on our website. our to com site president vladimir zaleski has fact general valerie is the lose the who's out this commander in chief of the armed forces of ukraine since july 2021. alexander safety has been appointed as the new head of the queen in the army. the media reported on the loose needs fried relationship with the landscape over the course of the conflict which reached breaking pointed along with the countries mobilization strategy after cubes failed counter offensive. artist shape always has more a diesel risk and it rumors of these risk have been life for many, many months now. it's now also being officially notified on the president's

sealants. he's website too. so this is definitely the news that many have been expecting. a lot of room, or though a lot of suggestions that there had been a rift, that as the general solution had refused to leave his post, and no one else would take it up, it's cetera. but the question remains is just part of a white or rift at the very top of the key, every g. you may feel like as it faces off against russia and it increasingly difficult situation. now, the actual dismissal itself has been pitched as a very friendly one. which is interesting, the imagery and the language that's gone around the zalinski fine thing is illusion, the 1st service, etc, junction is in the dollars. i'll lose the most of all. i am grateful to generals. illusion the for 2 years of protection, but then we spoke frankly today about what needs to change in the army was urgent changes that were by offered general's illusion to remain in the team of the ukrainian state in the future by his appointed colonel general ser stevie as the commander in chief of the armed forces of ukraine approval at all, combs, it made a very,

very difficult situation for ukraine. and this is all about the battlefield. really a general's illusion. a very experienced soldier. first joining the military academy in 2005, when you pointed as the leader of the ukrainian military and 2021, which is interesting, very well liked by his troops, very popular. i've seen as something of a pragmatist. but the reality speaks to the difficult situation that the general found himself in the russian m. o. d. recently suggesting that over 400000 ukranian troops have been lost in the conflict and the loss of significantly strategic important centers like back more at under the general's come mind leading to these kind of conflicts at the top of the political sphere. again, the president, the ukraine being more adamant to hold at all costs whereas, so lucy was a and it was prone to sort of more pragmatic, military approach, which is not by military strategy. if you like it. all. this comes as well as

russian troops are advancing along the wide stretches of the front too. so things don't look too good on the international stage, a lack of a lack of funding funding held up in, in the us at the middle, these crisis taking the world off your training if you like. and one of the key issues that really, maybe in the store, the broke the camel's back was when a general was illusion. he made a, an interview with the economist, the base of the suggested that this conflict would reach the style nice that they were gonna be real. sure. there wasn't gonna be any beautiful breakthrough. and that much like the 1st floor where the 2 sites have come to a stalemate on the battlefield. trench warfare, i feel like that's not exactly true because russian troops are gaining ground as we speak. put this openness from is that lose me? i think. and i think most of us would believe it was really a catalyst for the landscape seeking to end his career, just like in the 1st world war we have reached the level of technology that puts us into

a style made. there will most likely be no deep and beautiful breakthrough or time has passed, people are tired regardless of their status and this is understandable, but this is not a stalemate. i emphasize this once again. so as you can see, significant differences in the opinion here. this gap was whitening over the last number of months. yeah. certainly. can you get a storm background on the situation and what's happening on the battlefield? of course, as we speak, you claim needs more troops. and nobody would deny that in your training kia. and this was another one of the main sparking points between these 2 personalities at different sides of the data. and almost everything on the general's alluding to becoming more more vocal and his supporters becoming more vocal, even in ukrainian society. people very well disposed the general's illusion. whereas the president, the lens, these, the popularity ratings are actually lower. uh, when you ask the question, who do you support? so i mean, zaleski has no military knowledge whatsoever as well. and it seems that he was

increasing the waiting into debates on specific strategic decisions that have to be made. and it was really when the illusion event again, publicly criticized president savanski is a attempts to reform the recruitment laws, the drafting laws to bring women into the forces to recruit a vast army, to hold back at the advancing motions as illusion was against this. essentially, they were professionals, they knew how to do it and now they are not there. in terms of mobilization issues, it's not that it needs to be strengthened. it just needs to be brought back to the framework in which it was in which it worked before the disagreements were coming more and more vocal. and it was really a matter of time before the presence of landscape got this stone out of issue. if you like, you gotta wonder what is going to do to morale because general is illusion. elizabeth, rather popular. what we're going to tell us about this new commander in chief. well, a general sir ski alexander sits cc. he's the current commander of ukraine's ground

forces, which make up the, the main body of the plan. so army, remember, your frames army has probably been destroyed sadly as several times over compared to the army that stood in 2022. they've lost huge amounts of men. much of the constituent part of the russian, or the ukrainian military is now made up of territory and defense units. people are drafted into the military. and again, this was another issue where a loony opened, he criticized the idea that you're asking civilians to hold that critical infrastructure that we need to pull back to re um and prepare for a different type of war. uh, serious key is also a quite on ceremoniously known as general 20200 is military terminology for a deceased person. and he was actually the amount in charge of a very important thought. political in the bolts have been twin to 15 in the, in this and on the bus where a significant ukrainian force was surrounded and it too much of an extent, destroyed. so he's seen as

a mom that's willing to expend the lives of his man. he's seen as quite a high, you founded as a lensky loyalist. quite the opposite to general was a losing, so his appointment to me and to other on was looking at the situation seems to smack of some kind of desperation and also a complete change that interestingly the key every gene has also tonight suggested the reasons why they have basically dismiss general's illusion. sunday include that we need a new type of strategy. we need to brush that will sweep clean, become fellow a stalemate on the battlefield. and we need to invest and investigate different ways to continue to win the war against russia. no, no real objective analyst would suggest that you train is winning the war against bush. you. so we're gonna have to watch this space and see what this really sorry is make change at the top of the ukrainian regime means on the ground security expert,

michael. my new says that is the last case where shuffle shows the helpless position