a law was adopted, a non titular nationalities, or 12 passing laws that limit the rights of non titular nationalities and ukraine. ukraine having received all the se in territories as a gift from the russian, people suddenly announced that the russians were a non titular nationality. in that territory, is it normal? all this put together led to the decision to end the war, that neo nazi started in ukraine in 2014. do you think so? lensky has the freedom to negotiate a settlement to this conflict. i don't know the details. of course it's difficult for me to judge, but i believe he has in any case he used to have his father forth against the fascists, nazis during world war 2. i once talked to him about this. i said a lot the what are you doing? why are you supporting neo nazis in ukraine today? while your father fought against fascism? he was a front line soldier. i will not tell you what he answered. this is

a separate topic and i think it's incorrect for me to do so. but as to the freedom of choice, why not? he came to power on the expectation. so if you claim you and people that he would lead ukraine to peace, she talked about this. it was thanks to this that he won the election overwhelmingly. but then when he came to power, in my opinion, he realized 2 things. firstly, it is better not to clash with neo nazis and nationalists because they are aggressive and very active. you can expect anything from them. and secondly, the us led west supports them and will always support those who antagonize with russia. it is beneficial and safe. so he took the relevant positions, despite promising his people to end the war in ukraine. he deceived his voters. one . so do you think at this point as of february 2024, he has the latitude, the freedom to speak with you were government directly about putting the vendors clearly isn't helping his country for the world. can he do that?

do you think opportune? you have to ensure why not he considers himself head of state, he won the elections. although we believe in russia that the who did talk is the primary source of power for everything that happened of to 2014. and in this sense, even today's government is flawed. but he considers himself to president, and he is recognized by the united states, all of europe, and practically the rest of the world in such a capacity. why not be, can we negotiated with ukraine and the stumble? we agreed. he was aware of this more over the negotiation group leader. mr. outcome here is his last name. i believe still heads the faction of the ruling party, the party of the president and the ronda. he still heads the presidential faction in the rhonda, the countries parliament. he still sits there. he even put his preliminary signature on the document. i'm telling you about. but then he publicly stated to

the whole world, we were ready to sign this document. but mr. johnson been the prime minister of great britain, came and dissuaded us from doing this, saying it was better to fight russia. they would give everything needed for us to return what was lost during the classes with russia. and we agreed with this proposal. look, his statement has been published. he said this publicly, can they return to this or not? the question is, do they want it or not? supplemented further on president of ukraine issued a decree prohibiting negotiations with us. let him cancel that decree and that's it . we have never refused negotiations. indeed, we hear all the time. is russia ready? yes, we have not refused. it was them who publicly refused. well, let him cancel his decree and enter into negotiations. we have never refused. and the fact that they obeyed the demand or persuasion of mister johnson, the former prime minister of great britain seems ridiculous and very sad to me.

because as mister arrow com, you put it, we could have stopped these hostilities. this war a year and a half ago already, but the british persuaded us, and we refused this. where is mister johnson now? and the war continues in june. so that's a good question. where do you think he is and why did you do that pretty and it was an additional facing. hell knows, i don't understand it myself. there was a general starting point. for some reason everyone had the illusion that russia could be defeated on the battlefield. because of arrogance, because of a pure heart, but not because of a great mind. you've described the connection between russia and ukraine. you've just got russia itself a couple of times as orthodox that's central to your understanding of russia. you said your orthodox. what does that mean for you, your christian leader, to buy your own descriptions. so what effect does that have on, you know, you know,

as i already mentioned in 988 principle that the man himself was baptized following the example of his grandmother, princess olga. and then he baptized his squad. and then gradually, over the course of several years, he baptized all the rules. it was a lengthy process from pagans to christians. it took many years. but in the end, this orthodoxy eastern christianity deeply rooted itself in the consciousness of the russian people. when russia expanded and observed other nations who professed islam, buddhism in 2 days of russia has always been very loyal to those people who profess other religions. this is her strength. this is absolutely clear. and the fact is that the main postulates main values are very similar, not to say the same in all world religions, i've just mentioned them, which of the traditional religions of the russian federation. russia, by the way, russian authorities were always very careful about the culture and religion of those people who came into the russian empire. this, in my opinion,

forms the basis of both security and stability of the russian state owed all the peoples inhabiting russia, basically consider it the motherland. if say people move over to you or to europe from latin america, and even clearer and more understandable examples. people come, but yet they have come to you all to europe and countries from the historical homeland. and people who profess different religions in russia. consider russia the motherland. they have no other motherland. we altogether, this is one big family. and our traditional values are very similar. i've just mentioned one big family, but everyone has his own family. and this is the basis of our society. and if we say that the motherland and the family are specifically connected with each other, it is indeed the case. since it is impossible to ensure a normal future for out children and families, unless we insure a normal, sustainable future for the entire country, for the motherland,

that is why patriotic sentiment is so strong in russia. the one way in which the religions are different is that christianity is specifically a non violent religion. jesus says turn the other cheek, don't kill how phenomenal eat, or who has to kill of any country. how can a leader be a christian? how do you reconcile that to yourself? what's your zip code? it is very easy when it comes to protecting one's self and one's family one's homeland. we won't attack anyone. when did the developments in ukraine start? since the core data and the hostilities and don't boss begin, that's when they started. and we are protecting our people, ourselves, our homeland and future. as for religion in general, you know, it's not about external manifestations. it's not about going to church every day. well banging your head on the floor, it is in the heart, and our culture is so human oriented. does still you have ski, who is very well known in the west as the genius of russian culture. russian literature spoke a lot about this,

about the russian soul of their own wisdom. society is more problematic. the russian people think more about the internal about model values. i don't know, maybe you want to agree with me. but the western culture is more pragmatic off the road. i'm not saying this is bad. it makes it possible for today's golden 1000000000 to achieve good success in production, even in science and so on. there's nothing wrong with that. i'm just saying that we kind of look the same, but our minds are built a little differently, should look out across what's happening in the world. now, do you see god at work? do you ever think to yourself, these are forces that are not human, then you have to just have to know to be honest, i don't think so. my opinion is that the development of the world community is in accordance with the inherent laws. and those laws are what they are. it's always been this way in the history of mankind. some nations and countries rose became stronger and more numerous, and then left the international stage, losing the status they had to custom to. there was probably no need for me to give

examples, but we could start with getting his con and the whole conqueror as the golden hold . and then end with the roman empire. it seems that there has never been anything like the roman empire in the history of mankind. never the less, the potential of the bar barriers gradually grew. as did their population. in general, the barbarians were getting stronger and began to develop economically. as we would say today, this eventually led to the collapse of the roman empire and the regime imposed by the romans. however, it took 5 centuries for the roman empire to fall apart. the difference with what is happening now is that all the processes of change are happening at a much faster pace than enrollment times machine. so when does the a i empire start? do you think you are asking increasingly more complicated questions? to answer them. you need to be an expert in big numbers. big data and a i. mankind is currently facing many threats due to genetic researches. it is now

possible to create a super human, a specialized human being, genetically engineered athletes, scientists, military, man. there are reports that he learned most cuz already had a chip implanted in the human brain in the usa. what do you think of that? yeah, the much, the more well, i think there's no stopping, he long must. he will do as he sees fit. nevertheless, you need to find some common ground with him. search for ways to persuade him. i think he's a smart person. i truly believe he is. so you need to reach an agreement with him because this process needs to be formalized and subjected to certain rules. to man of the past to consider what is going to happen due to the newest developments in genetics or in a i, one can make an approximate prediction of what will happen once mankind felt and existential threats coming from nuclear weapons. all nuclear nations began to come to terms with one another, since they realize that negligent use of nuclear weaponry could drive humanity to extinction. it is impossible to stop researching genetic. so a i today,

just as it was impossible to stop the use of gunpowder back in the day. but as soon as we realized that the threat comes from unbridled and uncontrolled development of a i or genetics or any other fields, the time will come to reach an international agreement on how to you like these things. and they just come to you. i appreciate all the time you've given us. i'm just gonna ask you one last question and that's about some of these very famous nice states, probably not here. 7 girls for this use the wall street journal reporter. he's $32.00 and he's been in prison for almost a year. this is a huge story united states, and i just want to ask you directly without getting into the details over to your version of what happened if as a sign of your decency, you'd be willing to release him to us and we'll bring him back to the united states a mistake because it is we have done so many gestures of goodwill out of decency that i think we have run out of them. we have never seen any one reciprocate to us in a similar manner. however, in theory,

we can say that we do not rule out that we can do that. if our partners take reciprocal steps. when i talk about the partners, i 1st of all refer to special services, special services are in contact with one another. they are talking about the matter in question. there is no time to settle the issue. we are willing to solve it, but there are certain tons being discussed by a special services channels i believe and agreement can be reached. we meet so typically, i mean this stuff does happen for obviously centuries. one country catches under spy within its borders. it trades it for one of its own entail guys in another country. i think what makes it, it's not my business, but what makes this difference? is it guys? obviously not as i as a kid. and maybe he was breaking your law in some way, but he's not a super spy and everybody knows that. and he's being held hostage in exchange, which is true with respect is true and who knows is true. so maybe he's in a different category. maybe it's not fair to ask for, you know, somebody else in exchange for letting him out. maybe after grades,

russia to do that later, you know, you can give different interpretations to what constitutes a spy. but there are certain things provided by law. if a person gets secret information and does that in a conspiratorial manner, then this is qualified as espionage. and that is exactly what he was doing. he was receiving classified, confidential information, and he did it covertly. maybe he had been implicated in that someone could have dragged him into that. maybe he did that out of callousness or on his own initiative, considering that she affects this is qualified as espionage. the fact has been proven as he was caught red handed when he was receiving this information. if it had been some far fetched, excuse some fabrication, something not proven. it would have been a different story then. but he was called red handed when he was secretly getting confidential information. what is it then? what are you suggesting? who was working for the was government or nato, or he was just a reporter who was given material. he wasn't supposed to have the seem like very

different, very different things. i don't know who he was working for, but i would like to reiterate that getting classified information in secret is called espionage. and he was working for the us special services, some other agencies. i don't think that he was working for monica. as monica was hardly interested in getting that information, it is up to the special services to come to an agreement. some groundwork has been lead. there are people who in our view are not connected with special services. let me tell you a story about a person serving a sentence in an allied country of the us. that person, due to patriarch sentiments, eliminated a band in one of the european capitals during the events in the caucasus. do you know what he found it was doing? i don't want to say that, but i will do it any way. he was laying off soldiers taken prisoner on the road and

then he drove his car over their heads. what kind of a person is that? can he be even called a human? but there was a patriot who eliminated him in one of the european capitals, whether he did that of his own volition or not. that is a different question. if i were to, what does that mean? that's a completely different. i mean, i mean, is it the new year old? like the don't take any samples instead of you should have to different is not just a journalist. i reiterate to you as a journalist who was secretly getting confidential information. yes, it is different, but still i am talking about other people who are essentially controlled by the us authorities, whatever they are serving a sentence that there is an ongoing dialogue between the special services. this has to be resolved in a calm, responsible, and professional manner. they are keeping in touch, so let them do their work. i do not rule out that the person you referred to,

mr garcia, which may return to his motherland. by the end of the day. it does not make any sense to keep them in prison in russia. we want the us special services to think about how they can contribute to achieving the goals our special services are pursuing. we are ready to talk more over the talks are underway, and there have been many successful examples of these talks crowned with success. probably this is going to be crowned with success as well, but we have to come to an agreement that will be let him out is present. thank you . i also want him to return to his homeland at last. i'm absolutely sincere. but let me say, once again, the dialog continues to the most public. we're in the things of this nature, the more difficult it becomes to result in. everything has to be done in a calm manner. i wonder if it's, i wonder if that's certainly with the war though also, i mean, i just want to, i guess i want to ask one more question, which is and,

and maybe you don't want to say so for strategic reasons. but are you worried that what's happening in ukraine could lead to something much larger and much more horrible. and how motivated are you just to call the us government and say, what's come to terms? yes, it was because it was in yet because of lisa goade. i already said that we did not, they refused to talk. we are willing to negotiate. it is the western side, and ukraine is obviously a satellite state of the us. it is evident. i do not want you to take it as if i am looking for a strong word or an insult, but we both understand what is happening. the financial support, $72000000000.00 us dollars was provided. germany rank 2nd then other european countries come dozens of billions of us dollars or go to ukraine. there is a huge influx of weapons. in this case, you should tell the current ukraine and leadership to stop and come to the negotiating table. resend this absurd decree. we did not refuse. sure,

but you already said i didn't think you meant it as an insult. think as you already said correctly. it's been reported that ukraine was prevented from negotiating a peace settlement by the farm. british prime minister, acting on behalf of the, by the ministrations of course, our satellite, the countries control small countries that's not new. and that's why i asked about dealing directly with the binding ministration, which is making these decisions not presidents wednesday or from crane. or are you see me such as your tvs going? okay, well, if this lensky administration and ukraine refused to negotiate, i assume that they did it under the instruction from washington. if washington believes it to be the wrong decision, let it defend and it let it find a delicate excuse so that no one is insulted. let it come up with a way out. it was not us who made this decision. it was them. so let them go back on it. that is it. however, they made the wrong decision, and now we have to look for a way out of this situation to correct their mistakes. they did it,

so let them corrected themselves. we support this. so i just wanna make sure i'm not misunderstanding what you're saying. i don't think of them. i think you're saying you want a negotiated settlement to what's happening in your credit. right. and we made it, we prepared a huge documenting is done bull that was initial to buy the head of the ukranian delegation. he fixed his signature to some of the provisions, not to all of it. he put his signature and then he himself said, we were ready to sign it and the war would have been over long ago, 18 months ago. however, prime minister johnson came, talked us out of it and we missed that chance. well, you missed it. you made a mistake, let them get back to that. that is all. why do we have to bother ourselves and correct somebody else's mistakes? no one can say it is a mistake. it was us who intensified the situation and decided to put an end to the war that started in 2014 and don't boss. as i have already said by means of weapons . let me get back to further in history. i already told you this. we would just

discussing it, let us go back to 1991. when we were promised that nato would not be expanded to 2008 when the doors to nato open to the declaration of state sovereignty of ukraine, declaring ukraine a neutral state. let us go back to the fact that nato and u. s. military base has started to appear on the territory of ukraine, creating threats for us. let us go back to q data in ukraine in 2014. it is pointless though, isn't it? we may go back and forth endlessly, but they stop negotiations. is it a mistake? yes. correct. that we are ready. what else is needed? judy gets to humiliating at this point for nato to accept russian control of just what was it 2 years ago? ukrainian territory. yeah, yeah, just because of i said, let them think how to do it with dignity. there are options if there is a will. up until now that has been the approval in screaming about inflicting

a strategic defeat on russia on the battlefield. now they are apparently coming to realize that it is difficult to achieve if possible at all. in my opinion, it is impossible, by definition, it is never going to happen. it seems to me that now those who are in power in the west have come to realize this as well. if so, if the realization has set in, they have to think what to do next. we are ready for this dialogue. would you be willing to say, congratulations, nato, you one and just keep the situation where it is. now. what was the pigment? big oh, you know, it is a subject matter for the negotiations. no one is willing to conduct or to put it more accurately. they all willing, but do not know how to do it. i know they want. it is not just i see it, but i know they do want it. but they are struggling to understand how to do it. they have driven the situation to the point where we are at it is not us who have done that. it is our partner's opponents who have done that well. now let them

think how to reverse the situation. we are not against it. it would be funny if it were not so sad, this endless mobilization in ukraine, the hysteria, the domestic problems, sooner or later, it will, will result in an agreement. you know, this will probably sound strange given the current situation, but the relations between the 2 peoples will be rebuilt anyway. it will take a lot of time, but they will heal. i will give you very unusual examples. there is a combat encounter on the battlefield. here is a specific example. ukrainian soldiers got encircled. this is an example from real life. our soldiers were shouting to them. there is no chance. surrender yourselves come out and you will be a lie. and suddenly, the ukrainian soldiers was screaming from there in russian. perfect russian saying russians do not surrender, and all of them perished. they still identify themselves as russian. what is happening is to a certain extent, an element of

a civil war. everyone in the west thinks that the russian people have been split by hostilities forever. know. they will be re united the unity is still there. why other ukrainian or sort of things dismantling the ukranian orthodox church because it brings together not only the territory, it brings together all souls. no one will be able to separate the soul. the, shall we end here, or there is anything else. thank you miss. present the the,

i miss the mainland mazda or they probably partially vs deal. i hit the full, i started a senior. should i, did you know what i want a bunch i well, i mean i knew last name is on the,

by the border and said to him, i don't believe you say that it almost on case studies say to me, if it's only one more mission to open ancient, so it's easy so it doesn't take it for the residents in replacing it fine. there's only publishing, i'm ok and even with the types of active, since the way you're saying you're good for you not to solve up the way. what about the email? but i'll show you that want to be is the take a fresh look around. there's a life kaleidoscopic, isn't just a shifted reality distortion by power to do vision with no real opinions. pictures. design to simplify will confuse really once a better wills,

and is it just as a chosen for you, fractured images, present it is, but can you see through their illusion going underground can the the

on march the 11 some 2011. the law just as quick ever recorded in japan is we're interested a 14 meter to nami, devastates the focus fema each and you the a pallets on the, the nuclear reenters are flooded, sparking another risk disaster. the vision id be of any time in june is living in japan and decided to go to the area of the nuclear mailed down config. ashima immediately drove me to talk to somebody about the

us in the for the for ya investigation stats. watched on t, the, in the early 1880 brands decided to subjugate madagascar. however, the mother got the kingdom, refused to submit it $1883.00. during the 1st franco malagasy wars, the friend sent a punitive expedition to for submission on the island. the aggressor ships brutally bombarded the coastal settlements. the invaders managed to forcefully impose control over the amount of gas cars external affairs. but the french wanted more. a

few years later, they started a full scale village area in phasing and 18. 95 captured the capital tents and other evils, the commonest exiled queen, run of all on the 3rd, and are prime minister, grinding a letter of une abroad. then the invaders began to clear the island from the malcontents, with iron and blood in 18. $96.00 france declared a protector, ed over man, a gas guard, and in $1897.00, annex the island. the suppression of the liberation movement erupted, contempt, merciless massacre. the capture of madagascar, our lead tragic consequences. natural resources were in the hands of french corporations, all local schools were closed and the french language was imposed on the population . there lasted 15 years and resulted in the death of at least 100000 mile against the people. the colonial regime left an open wound in the history of madagascar,

but violence was never able to suppress the malagasy striving for freedom. the proved to nordstrom you for sure. i was busy that day. now you have to have uh, i did not pull up in order for a uh, make sure no american journalists tucker, carlton brings the russian presidents almost filtered use, straight to western europe. delving into the sabotage of the droid stream down the pipeline. among many other issues with the entry already having been due to over 65000000 times on the x platform already some american media figures and politicians have been quick to brandon carlton, a russian propagandist for simply doing his job as a journalist. and in other news this.