is the guardian says its investigation on what's in low cost risk viewed, the company strives to cover up atrocities by offering drives to people just paying the narrative, the tie stones to the body, to keep it from floating in the water, to keep it from decomposing. not just one person was cute and then monta. there are many with sick injustice president or should know this. they should stop queueing on what children. they arrest them if they should take them to port not to give them any human i do. but whenever i see 1st from delmonte, i feel as i've seen the blood of my son quite always too bitter knowing very well we're under new calling. you've reached people who do not care about others. there are people in 2 months, either politicians were influential. people for always obstruct justice as all complaints filed against the one thing are not resolved. no more today. we spoke with brian over line from the canyon human rights commission, who 6 just this, but those killed on the repressive conditions. because we are looking forward to

the government, but at the moment of course the company is raising uh uh, eliminate objection the, the myself in terms of guessing that the quotes and kind of do is dixon. uh to handle uh dimensions. because it, because i do have to be able to possibly meet you, get to the community in general, have a big company uh with a company. and you could see this by the number of victories, definitely incorporating this differently in portland, this one, despite these company making millions and billions of dollars. so the benefit will be something you know, the house before the kid is the main induced on this property. then be support and company city, so you should be fine. that's a kind of you and i would say we'd are those kind of a 14 and then last name. what's so in terms of paying for the legal fees,

of course and your bill definitely sure. and that's, i think this dustin, somebody who works with me and of course, you know, at the functions including a, telling the market in the, okay, these are the okay with us that, uh, this company, the products, that's the people in the product. so do you think the product but definitely yet it was a product of uh, kind of you, thanks for joining us. this friday. i'm going to meeting with the next part of the full interview between talk a call soon on president who's in now on spectrum. you're doing that, get some more news at the top of the i just have to ask you, you've said clearly that nato expansion is where it is a violation of the promise you all are made. and i mean it's, it's a threat to your country, right before you send troops in to ukraine,

the vice president, night states once munich, security conference, and encouraged the president of ukraine to join nato. do you think that was an effort to provoke you into military actions? you should've supposed to, i repeat once again. we have repeatedly repeatedly propose to seek a solution to the problems that arose in ukraine after the 2014 who did talk through peaceful means. but no one listened to us. and moreover, the ukrainian leaders who were under the complete us control suddenly declared that they would not comply with the men's grievance. they disliked everything that and continued military activity in that territory. and in power low. that territory was being exploited by nato military structures under the guise of various personnel training and retraining centers. they essentially began to create faces that, that's all ukraine announced that the russians were a little, was adopted, a non titular nationality, while passing laws that limit the rights of non titular nationalities in ukraine.

this means you crane having received all the se in territories as a gift from the russian. people suddenly announced that the russians were a non titular nationality in that territory. is it normal? all this put together led to the decision to end the war, that neo nazi started in ukraine in 2014. do you think so? lensky has the freedom to negotiate a settlement to this conflict. i don't know the details. of course it's difficult for me to judge, but i believe he has in any case he used to have his father forth against the fascists, nazis during world war 2. i once talked to him about this. i said, beloved yeah. what are you doing? why are you supporting neo nazis in ukraine today? while your father fought against fascism? he was a front line soldier. i will not tell you what he answered. this is a separate topic and i think it's incorrect for me to do so. it's so important. but as to the freedom of choice, why not?

he came to power on the expectation. so if you claim you and people that he would lead to claim to peace, he talked about this. it was thanks to this that he won the election overwhelmingly . but then when he came to power, in my opinion, he realized 2 things. firstly, it is better not to clash with neo nazis and nationalists because they are aggressive and very active. you can expect anything from them. and secondly, the us led west supports them and will always support those who antagonize with russia. it is beneficial and safe. so he took the relevant positions, despite promising his people to end the war in ukraine. he deceived his voters. one, what do you think at this point as if february 2024, he has the latitude, the freedom to speak with you or your government directly about putting vendors, which clearly isn't helping his country or the world. can he do that? do you think opportune you have to and why not?

he considers himself head of state, he won the elections. although we believe in russia that the who did talk is the primary source of power for everything that happened after 2014. and in this sense, even today's government is flawed, but he considers himself to president, and he is recognized by the united states, all of europe, and practically the rest of the world in such a capacity. why not? because we negotiated with ukraine and the stumble we agreed he was aware of this more over the negotiation group leader. mr. outcome here is his last name. i believe still heads the faction of the ruling party, the party of the president and the ronda. he still heads the presidential faction in the rada, the countries parliament. he still sits there. he even put his preliminary signature on the document, i'm telling you about. but then he publicly stated to the whole world, we were ready to sign this document. but mister johnson, then the prime minister of great britain came and dissuaded us from doing this,

saying it was better to fight russia. they would give everything needed for us to return what was lost during the classes with russia. and we agreed with this proposal. look, his statement has been published. he said this publicly, can they return to this or not? the question is, do they want it or not? for their own president of ukraine, issued a decree prohibiting negotiations with us. let him cancel that decree, and that's it. we have never refused negotiations. indeed, we hear all the time. is russia ready? yes, we have not refused. it was them who publicly refused. well, let him cancel his decree and enter into negotiations. we have never refused, and the fact that they obeyed the demand or persuasion of mister johnson. the former prime minister of great britain seems ridiculous and very sad to me. because as mister arrow com, you put it, we could have stopped these hostilities this war

a year and a half ago already. but the british persuaded us, and we refused this. where is mister johnson now? and the war continues. johnson, how are you? that's a good question. where do you think he is and what did you do? the pretty and it was an additional facing. hell knows, i don't understand it myself. there was a general starting point for some reason everyone had the illusion that russia could be defeated on the battlefield because of arrogance because of a pure heart. but not because of a great mind. you've described the connection between russia and ukraine. you've just got rush itself a couple of times as orthodox that's central to your understanding of russia. you said your orthodox, what does that mean for you, your christian leader, to buy your own descriptions. so what effect does that have on, you know, you know, as i already mentioned in 988 principal, that the man himself was baptized following the example of his grandmother,

princess olga. and then he baptized his squad. and then gradually, over the course of several years, he baptized old the roost. it was a lengthy process from pagans to christians. it took many years. but in the end, this orthodoxy eastern christianity deeply rooted itself in the consciousness of the russian people. when russia expanded and observed other nations who profess islam, buddhism in 2 days of russia has always been very loyal to those people who profess other religions. this is her strength. this is absolutely clear. and the fact is that the main post to its main values are very similar, not to say the same in all world religions i've just mentioned in which of the traditional religions of the russian federation, russia, by the way, russian authorities were always very careful about the culture and religion of those people who came into the russian empire. this, in my opinion, forms the basis of both security and stability of the russian state owed all the

peoples inhabiting russia, basically consider it the motherland. if say, people move over to you or to europe from latin america, and even clearer and more understandable examples. people come. but yet they have come to you all to europe and countries from the historical homeland. and people who profess different religions in russia. consider russia, the motherland. they have no other motherland. we altogether, this is one big family. and our traditional values are very similar. i've just mentioned one big family, but everyone has his own family. and this is the basis of our society. and if we say that the motherland and the family are specifically connected with each other, it is indeed the case. since it is impossible to ensure a normal future for out children and families, unless we insure a normal, sustainable future for the entire country, for the motherland, that is why patriotic sentiment is so strong in russia. the one way in which the religions are different is that christianity is specifically

a non violent religion. jesus says turn the other cheek, don't kill. how can i eat or who has to kill of any country? how can a leader be a christian? how do you reconcile that to yourself? what's your zip code? it is very easy when it comes to protecting one's self and one's family one's homeland. we won't attack anyone. when did the developments in ukraine start? since the core data and the hostilities and don't boss begin to, that's when they started and we are protecting our people, ourselves, all homeland and future. as for religion in general, you know, it's not about external manifestations. it's not about going to church every day or banging your head on the floor. it is in the heart, and our culture is so human oriented. does still you have ski, who is very well known in the west as the genius of russian culture. russian literature spoke a lot about this, about the russian soul of their own wisdom. society is more problematic. russian people think more about the internal about model values. i don't know,

maybe you won't agree with me, but the western culture is more pragmatic off the road. i'm not saying this is bad, it makes it possible for today's golden 1000000000 to achieve good success in production, even in science and so on. there's nothing wrong with that. i'm just saying that we kind of look the same, but our minds are built a little differently. we should look out across what's happening in the world. now, do you see god at work? do you ever think to yourself, these are forces that are not human then you have to just let me know to be honest, i don't think so. my opinion is that the development of the world community is in accordance with the inherent laws. and those laws are what they are. it's always been this way in the history of mankind. some nations and countries rose became stronger and more numerous, and then left the international stage, losing the status they had to custom to. there was probably no need for me to give examples, but we could start with getting his con and the whole conqueror as the golden hold

. and then end with the roman empire. it seems that there has never been anything like the roman empire in the history of mankind. never the less, the potential of the bar barriers gradually grew. as did their population. in general, the barbarians were getting stronger and began to develop economically. as we would say today, this eventually led to the collapse of the roman empire and the regime imposed by the romans. however, it took 5 centuries for the roman empire to fall apart. the difference with what is happening now is that all the processes of change are happening at a much faster pace than enrollment times. so when does the a empire start? do you think you are asking increasingly more complicated questions? to answer them, you need to be an expert in big numbers. big data and a i, the mankind is currently facing many threats due to genetic researches. it is now possible to create a super human, a specialized human being, genetically engineered athletes,

sciences military man. there are reports that the law must cuz already had a chip implanted in the human brain in the usa, what do you think of that? yeah, the much, the more well, i think there's no stopping he long musk he will do as he sees fit, never the less you need to find some common ground with him. search for ways to persuade him. i think he's a smart person. i truly believe he is. so you need to reach an agreement with him because this process needs to be formalized and subjected to certain rules to man of the past to consider what is going to happen. due to the newest developments in genetics or in a i, one can make an approximate prediction of what will happen once mankind felt and existential threats coming from nuclear weapons. all nuclear nations began to come to terms with one another, since they realize that negligent use of nuclear weaponry could drive humanity to extinction. it is impossible to stop researching genetic. so a i today, just as it was impossible to stop the use of gunpowder back in the day. but as soon as we realize that the threat comes from unbridled and uncontrolled development of

a i or genetics or any other fields, the time will come to reach an international agreement on how to regulate these things. i appreciate all the time you've given us. i'm just gonna ask you one last question and that's about some of the very famous nice states, probably not here. kevin goes to this. who's the wall street journal reporter? he's $32.00 and he's been in prison for almost a year. this is a huge store in united states, and i just want to ask you directly without getting into the details over to your version of what happened if as a sign of your decency, you'd be willing to release him to us and we'll bring him back to the united states, a mistake because this we have done so many gestures of goodwill out of decency that i think we have run out of them. we have never seen anyone reciprocate to us in a similar manner. however, in theory, we can say that we do not rule out that we can do that. if our partners take reciprocal steps. when i talk about the partners,

i 1st of all refer to special services, special services are in contact with one another. they are talking about the matter in question. there is no time to settle the issue. we are willing to solve it, but there are certain terms being discussed by a special services channels. i believe an agreement can be reached immediately. so typically, i mean this stuff has happened for obviously, centuries. one country catches under spied within its borders. it trades it for one of its own entail guys in another country. i think it's not my business, but what makes this difference is the guys, obviously not as i as a kid. and maybe he was breaking your law in some way, but he's not a super spy and everybody knows that. and he's being held hostage in exchange, which is true with respect is true, never knows is true. so maybe he's in a different category. maybe it's not fair to ask for, you know, somebody else in exchange for letting him out. maybe it degrades russia to do that . later, you know, you can give different interpretations to what constitutes a spy, but there are certain things provided by law. if

a person gets secret information and does that in a conspiratorial manner, then this is qualified as espionage. and that is exactly what he was doing. he was receiving classified, confidential information and he did it covertly. maybe he had been implicated in that someone could have dragged him into that. maybe he did that out of callousness or on his own initiative, considering that she affects this is qualified as espionage. the fact has been proven as he was caught red handed when he was receiving this information. if it had been some far fetched excuse some fabrication, something not proven. it would have been a different story then. but he is caught red handed when he was secretly getting confidential information. what is it then? what are you suggesting? it, he was working for the was government or nato, or he was just a reporter who was given materials. he wasn't supposed to have the seem like very different, very different things. i don't know who he was working for,

but i would like to reiterate that getting classified information in secret is called espionage. and he was working for the us special services, some other agencies. i don't think that he was working for monica. as monica was hardly interested in getting that information, it is up to the special services to come to an agreement. some groundwork has been laid. there are people who in our view, are not connected with special services. let me tell you a story about a person serving a sentence in an allied country of the us. that person, due to patriarch sentiments, eliminated a band in one of the european capitals during the events in the caucasus. do you know what he found it was doing? i don't want to say that, but i will do it any way. he was laying off soldiers taken prisoner on the road and then he drove his car over their heads. what kind of a person is that? can he be even cold, a human?

but there was a patriot, so eliminated him in one of the european capitals, whether he did that of his own volition or not. that is a different question. if i were to, what does that mean? that's a completely different. i mean, i mean, is it the new year old? like the don't take the money samples instead of the shift additional, he is not just a journalist. i reiterate to you as a journalist who was secretly getting confidential information. yes, it is different, but still i am talking about other people who are essentially controlled by the us authorities, wherever they are serving a sentence. there is an ongoing dialogue between the special services. this has to be resolved in a calm, responsible, and professional manner. they are keeping in touch, so let them do their work. i do not rule out that the person you referred to, mr garcia, which may return to his motherland. by the end of the day. it does not make any sense to keep them in prison in russia. we want the us special services to think

about how they can contribute to achieving the goals our special services are pursuing. we are ready to talk more over the talks are underway, and there have been many successful examples of these talks crowned with success. probably this is going to be crowned with success as well, but we have to come to an agreement that will be let him out. this prison. thank you. i also want him to return to his homeland at last. i'm absolutely sincere. but let me say, once again, the dialog continues to the more public we are in the things of this nature, the more difficult it becomes to result them. everything has to be done in a calm manner. i wonder if it's, i wonder if that's certainly with the war though also, i mean, i just want to, i guess i want to ask one more question, which is and maybe you don't want to say so for strategic reasons. but are you worried that what's happening in ukraine could lead to something much larger and

much more horrible. and how motivated are you just to call the us government and say, what's come to terms younger risk of losing your cousin release a bit ago. i already said that we did not refuse to talk. we are willing to negotiate. it is the western side, and ukraine is obviously a satellite state of the us. it is evident. i do not want you to take it as if i am looking for a strong word or an insult, but we both understand what is happening. the financial support, $72000000000.00 us dollars was provided. germany rank 2nd then other european countries come dozens of billions of us dollars or go to ukraine. there is a huge influx of weapons. in this case, you should tell the current ukraine and leadership to stop and come to the negotiating table, resend to the subsea decree. we did not refuse. sure, but you already said that i didn't think you meant it as an insult. think as you already said correctly, it's been reported that ukraine was prevented from negotiating

a peace settlement by the former british prime minister, acting on behalf of the binding ministries. and so of course our satellite, the countries control small countries that's not new. and that's why i asked about dealing directly with the, by the ministration which is making these decisions. not as presidents awards view from crane. the you see me substituting is gone. ok. well, if this a lensky administration and ukraine refused to negotiate, i assume that they did it under the instruction from washington. if washington believes it to be the wrong decision, let it defend and it let it find a delicate excuse so that no one is insulted. let it come up with a way out. it was not us who made this decision. it was them. so let them go back on it. that is it. however, they made the wrong decision, and now we have to look for a way out of the situation to correct their mistakes. they did it, so let them correct it themselves. we support this. so i just wanna make sure i'm not misunderstanding what you're saying. i don't think of them,

i think you're saying you want a negotiated settlement to what's happening and you're right. and we made it. we prepared a huge documenting eastern bull that was initials by the head of the ukranian delegation. he fixed his signature to some of the provisions, not to all of it. he put his signature and then he himself said, we were ready to sign it and the war would have been over long ago. 18 months ago. however, prime minister johnson came, talked us out of it and we missed that chance. well, you missed it, you made a mistake. let them get back to that. that is all. why do we have to bother ourselves and correct somebody else's mistakes? i no one can say it is all mistake. it was us who intensified the situation and decided to put an end to the war that started in 2014 and on bus. as i have already said, by means of weapons. let me get back to further in history. i already told you this, we were just discussing it. let us go back to 1991. when we would promise that nato would not be expanded to 2008 when the doors to nato open to the declaration of

state sovereignty of ukraine, declaring ukraine, a neutral state. let us go back to the fact that nato and us military base has started to appear on the territory of ukraine, creating threats for us. let us go back to coo data in ukraine in 2014. it is pointless though, isn't it? we may go back and forth endlessly, but they stop negotiations. is it a mistake? yes. correct. that we are ready. what else is needed? get started. judy gets to humiliating at this point for nato to accept russian control of what was 2 years ago. ukrainian territory. yeah, all right, you know, i said let them think how to do it with dignity. there are options if there is a will. up until now, there has been the up rule in screaming about inflicting a strategic defeat on russia on the battlefield. now they are apparently coming to realize that it is difficult to achieve if possible at all. in my opinion,

it is impossible, by definition, it is never going to happen. it seems to me that now those who are in power in the west have come to realize this as well. if so, if the realization has set in, they have to think what to do next. we are ready for this dialogue. would you be willing to say, congratulations, nato, you one and just keep the situation where it is. now, what was mentioned to me to go, you know, it is a subject matter for the negotiations. no one is willing to conduct or to put it more accurately. they all willing, but do not know how to do it. i know they want. it is not just i see it, but i know they do want it. but they are struggling to understand how to do it. they have driven the situation to the point where we are at it is not us who have done that. it is our partners, opponents who have done that well. now let them think how to reverse the situation . we are not against it. it would be funny if it were not so sad,

this endless mobilization in ukraine, the hysteria, the domestic problems, sooner or later, it will result in an agreement. you know, this will probably sound strange given the current situation, but the relations between the 2 peoples will be rebuilt anyway. it will take a lot of time, but they will heal. i will give you very unusual examples. there is a come back encounter on the battlefield. here is a specific example. ukrainian soldiers got encircled. this is an example from real life. our soldiers was shouting to them. there is no chance. surrender yourselves come out and you will be alive. suddenly, the ukrainian soldiers was screaming from there in russian. perfect russian saying russians do not surrender. and all of them perished. these still identify themselves as russian. what is happening is to a certain extent, an element of a civil war. everyone in the west thinks that the russian people have been split by hostilities forever know they will be re united. the unity is still there.

why, of the ukrainian or sort of these dismantling the ukranian orthodox church because it brings together not only the territory, it brings together all souls. no one will be able to separate the soul. the shall we end here or there is anything else. thank you miss present the the, the

acceptance that i'm here to plan with you. whatever you do, you do not watch my new show seriously. why watch something that's so different listed of opinions that he won't get anywhere else. welcome to please or do have the state department c i a weapons makers, multi 1000000000 dollar corporations. choose your fax for you. go ahead. change and whatever you do. don't want my shelves to stay main street because i'm probably going to make you uncomfortable. my show is called stretching time, but again, you probably don't wanna watch it because it might just change the way you the 1st time in history and meantime country's culture has been cancelled. the very modern weapons cancel a culture. they need to ask one of the associated miles to the truck. it just means that in the one a who puts the glue,

the phrase now particularly refers to canceling russian culture. and yet the worst it creates a few of those to that i get 20 miles folks to pittsville renewal. that is charlotte phillips, that the most of the separate yolanda m e. the moines blood rushes created the pos 1500 years. there's no questions, partially condemned, reviled and reject it to sit alone and use that a to put somebody at the middle of panel. there's a lot, i don't know because i don't know. she doesn't have to use it a little. some of this joining total comes of nation grows daily and now including the us, they ask you to go skate. shostakovich, get the i need to. yeah. or less, but yeah, she goes to the things that would just be on the w 2 year up. i'm gonna need you to

the full of north stream you for sure. i was busy that you need it and you have to have uh, i just uploaded or uh, american journalists tucker comes and brings the russian president on phil certain views, straight to west and audiences. delving into the sabotage of the newest dream gas pipelines monk many more with the interview or saving of the 19000000 team to read the on the x top home some american media speakers, encore, the titian's. i've been quick to brand calls and a russian propagandist for simply doing his job as a journalist.