ologist services on in the political leads around the world are analyzing in granular detail the cellphone messages that were given by latimer food, enjoying the speech, and over well many those messages. whereas, which are our doors that can be opened, there is a positive reconciliation in partnership. thank you. i think it's absolutely remarkable. so many thanks for your company. i'm meeting you now is thoughtful of the big interview between soccer calls and answer documents. who's in and make sure you join me again. some more news and 13 the. i just have to ask you, you've said clearly that nato expansion is where it is a violation of the promise you are made and such as. i mean it's, it's a threat to your country. right before you send troops in to ukraine, the vice president, night states with munich security conference and encouraged the president of ukraine to join nato. do you think that was an effort to provoke you into military actions? insured as opposed to i repeat once again, we have repeatedly repeatedly propose to seek

a solution to the problems that arose in ukraine off to the 2014 who to talk through peaceful news. but no one listen to us. and moreover, the ukranian leaders who under the complete us control suddenly declared that they would not comply with the minsk agreements. they disliked everything that and continued military activity in that territory. and in power though, that territory was being exploited by nato military structures under the guise of various personnel training and retraining centers. they essentially began to create faces that, that's all ukraine announced that the russians were a little, was adopted, a non titular nationality. so while passing laws that limit the rights of non titular nationalities in ukraine, ukraine having received all these se and territories as a gift from the russian people suddenly announced that the russians were a non titular nationality in that territory. is it normal? all this put together led to the decision to end the war,

that neo nazi started in ukraine in 2014, if you need to, to you. do you think so? lensky has the freedom to negotiate a settlement to this conflict. i don't know the details. of course it's difficult for me to judge, but i believe he has in any case used to have his father fought against the fascists. nazis during world war 2. i once talked to him about this. i said, beloved, yeah. what are you doing? why are you supporting neo nazis in ukraine today? while your father fought against fascism? he was a front line soldier. i will not tell you what he answered. this is a separate topic and i think it's incorrect for me to do so. but as to the freedom of choice, why not? he came to power on the expectations of ukrainian people that he would lead to credit the piece. he talked about this, it was thanks to this that he won the election overwhelmingly, show that to me. but then when he came to power, in my opinion, he realized 2 things. firstly, shit is better not to clash with neo nazis

a nationalist summertime because they are aggressive and very active. you can expect anything from them. and secondly, the us led west supports them and will always support those who antagonize with rush up to you. it is beneficial and safe. so he took the relevant position, despite promising his people to end the war in ukraine. picky deceived his voters. what do you think at this point as of february 2024? he has the latitude, the freedom to speak with you or your government directly about putting the vendors clearly isn't helping his country for the world. can he do that? do you think the junior ones, why not sure that he considers himself head of state, he won the elections, although we believe in russia that the crew to talk is the primary source of power for everything that happened of to 2014. and in this sense associated even today's government is flawed against him, but he considers himself to president only stuff,

and he is recognized by the united states, all of europe. and practically the rest of the world in such a capacity. why not good casualties? we negotiated with ukraine and the stumble. we agreed he was aware of this being a lot more over the negotiation group leader. mr. outcome here is his last name. i believe i still heads the faction of the ruling party, the party of the president and the ronda, right. he still has the presidential section in the right of the countries parliament. he still sits there. he even put his preliminary signature on the document. i'm telling you about but then he publicly stated to the whole world when we were ready to sign this document. but mister johnson, then the prime minister of great britain came and dissuaded us from doing this, saying it was better to fight russia. they would give everything needed for us to return what was lost during the classes with russia. and we agreed with this proposal. look, his statement has been published. he said this publicly,

can they return to this or not so much? the question is, do they want it or not? for their own president of ukraine, issued a decree prohibiting negotiations with us. let him cancel that decree and that's it . we have never refused negotiations. indeed, we hear all the time. is russia ready? yes, we have not refused. it was them who publicly refused. well, let him cancel his decree and enter into negotiations. we have never refused, and the fact that they obeyed the demand or persuasion of mister johnson. the former prime minister of great britain seems ridiculous and very sad to me. because as mister arrow com you put it is this thing. we could have stopped these hostilities, this war a year and a half ago already. but the british persuaded us, and we refused this. where was mister johnson now? and the war continues to explain, john, so that's a good question. where do you think he is? and what did he do? the party and it wasn't much facing hell knows. i don't understand it myself. there

was a general starting point. for some reason everyone had the illusion that russia couldn't be defeated on the battlefield because of arrogance, because of a pure heart. but not because of a great mind. you've described other connection between russia and ukraine. you've just got russia itself a couple of times as orthodox that's central. if you are understanding of russia, you said you're at work docs. what does that mean for you? you're a christian leader to buy your own description. so what effect does that have on, you know, you know, as i already mentioned in 988 prince, let him in himself was baptized following the example of his grandmother, princess olga. and then he baptized his squad. and then gradually, over the course of several years, he baptized all the rules. it was a lengthy process from pagans to christians. it took many years. but in the end, this orthodoxy eastern christianity deeply rooted itself in the consciousness of

the russian people. when russia expanded and absorbed other nations who professed islam, buddhism in 2 days of russia has always been very loyal to those people who profess other religions. this is her strength. this is absolutely clear. and the fact is that the main postulates main values are very similar, not to say the same in all world religions i've just mentioned, and which of the traditional religions of the russian federation, russia, by the way, russian authorities were always very careful about the culture and religion of those people who came into the russian empire. this, in my opinion, forms the basis of both security and stability of the russian state owed all the peoples inhabiting russia, basically consider it the motherland, each se, people move over to you or to europe, from latin america, and even clearer and more understandable example. people come, but yet they have come to you for to europe and countries from the historical homeland. and people who profess different religions in russia. consider russia the

motherland. they have no other motherland. we altogether, this is one big family. and our traditional values are very similar. i've just mentioned one big family, but everyone has, he's has his own family. and this is the basis of our society. and if we say that the motherland and the family are specifically connected with each other, it is indeed the case. since it is impossible to ensure a normal future for out children and our families unless we insure a normal, sustainable future for the entire country. for the motherland, that is why patriotic sentiment is so strong in russia. the one way in which the religions are different is that christianity is specifically a non violent religion. jesus says, turn the other cheek, don't kill how phenomenal lead or who has to kill of any country. how can a leader be a christian? how do you reconcile that to yourself? what's your zip code? it is very easy when it comes to protecting one's self and one's family one's

homeland. we won't attack anyone. when did the developments in ukraine start? since the qu data and the hostilities and don't boss begin to? that's when they started. and we are protecting our people, ourselves, our homeland and our future. as for religion in general, you know, it's not about external manifestations. it's not about going to church every day or banging your head on the floor. it is in the heart, and our culture is so human oriented does through epsky, who is very well known in the west as the genius of russian culture. russian literature spoke a lot about this, about the russian soul of their own wisdom. society is more pragmatic. the russian, people think more about the turn of about model values. i don't know, maybe you want to agree with me. but the western culture is more pragmatic. after all, i'm not saying this is bad. it makes it possible for today's golden 1000000000 to achieve good success in production, even in science and so on. there's nothing wrong with that. i'm just saying that we

kind of look the same, but our minds are built a little differently which should look out across what's happening in the world. now do you see got it work, do you ever think to yourself these are forces that are not human then you have to get to know to be honest, i don't think so. my opinion is that the development of the world community is in accordance with the inherent laws. and those laws are what they are. it's always been this way in the history of mankind. some nations and countries rose became stronger and more numerous, and then left the international stage losing the status they had a custom to use. there's probably no need for me to give examples, but we can start with getting his con and the whole conqueror as the golden horse, and then end with the roman empire. it seems that there has never been anything like the roman empire in the history of mankind. never the less, the potential of the bar variance gradually grew. as did their population. in general, the barbarians were getting stronger and began to develop economically. as we would say today,

this eventually led to the collapse of the roman empire and the regime imposed by the romans center. however, it took 5 centuries for the roman empire to fall apart. the difference with what is happening now is that all the processes of change are happening at a much faster pace than enrollment times. so when does the a i m pyre start? do you think you're asking increasingly more complicated questions? to answer them, you need to be an expert in big numbers. big data and a i. mankind is currently facing many threats due to genetic researches. it is now possible to create a super human, a specialized human being, genetically engineered athletes, sciences military man. there are reports that he learned must cuz already had a chip implanted in the human brain in the usa is what do you think of that? yeah, the much, the more. well, i think there's no stopping, he long must. he will do as he sees fit, never the less you need to find some common ground with him. search for ways to persuade him. i think he's

a smart person. i truly believe he is. so you need to reach an agreement with him because this process needs to be formalized and subjected to certain rules to manitoba has to consider. what is going to happen due to the newest developments in genetics or in a i. one can make an approximate prediction of what will happen once mankind felt and existential threats coming from nuclear weapons. all nuclear nations began to come to terms with one another, since they realize that negligent use of nuclear weaponry could drive humanity to extinction. it is impossible to stop researching genetic so a i today just as it was impossible to stop the use of guns held it back in the day . but as soon as we realized that the threat comes from unbridled and uncontrolled development of a i or genetics or any other fields, the time will come to reach an international agreement on how to re do you like these things. your name is controlling. i appreciate all the time you've given us. i'm just gonna ask you one last question and that's about some of these very famous,

nice dates, probably not here. evan grows to, that's who's the wall street journal reporter. he's 32. and he's been in prison for almost a year. this is a huge store in united states, and i just want to ask you directly without getting into the details over to your version of what happened if as a sign of your decency, you'd be willing to release them to us and we'll bring them back to the united states, a mistake because this we have done so many gestures of goodwill out of decency that i think we have run out of them. we have never seen anyone reciprocate to us in a similar manner. however, in theory, we can say that we do not rule out that we can do that. if our partners take reciprocal steps. when i talk about the partners, i 1st of all refer to special services, special services are in contact with one another. they are talking about the matter in question. there is no trouble to settle the issue. we are willing to solve it, but there are certain terms being discussed by a special services channels i believe and agreement can be reached. so typically, i mean this stuff has happened for obviously,

centuries. one country catches under 5, within its borders. it trades it for one of his own entail guys in another country . i think it's not my business, but what makes this difference is the guys, obviously not us. why as a kid. and maybe he was breaking your law in some way, but he's not a super spy and everybody knows that. and he's being held hostage in exchange, which is true with respect is true, never knows is true. so maybe he's in a different category. maybe it's not fair to ask for, you know, somebody else in exchange for letting him out, maybe integrates russia to do that. you know, you can give different interpretations to what constitutes a spy, but there are certain things provided by law. if a person gets secret information and does that in a conspiratorial manner, then this is qualified as espionage. and that is exactly what he was doing. he was receiving classified, confidential information and he did it covertly shows that maybe he had been implicated in that someone could have dragged him into that. maybe he did that out

of callousness or on his own initiative, considering the she affects. this is qualified as espionage. the fact has been proven as he was caught red handed when he was receiving this information. if it had been some far fetched excuse for some fabrication, something not proven. it would have been a different story then. but he was caught red handed when he was secretly getting confidential. information is, what is it then? what are you suggesting? who was working for the was government or nato, or he was just a reporter who was given materials. he wasn't supposed to have the seem like very different, very different things. i don't know who he was looking for, but i would like to reiterate that getting classified information in secret, it's called espionage, and he was working for the us special services, some other agencies. i don't think that he was working for monica. as monica was hardly interested in getting that information, it is up to the special services to come to an agreement. some ground work has been

laid. there are people who, in our view, are not connected with special services. let me tell you a story about a person serving a sentence in an allied country of the us. that person, due to patriarch sentiments, eliminated a band in one of the european capitals. during the events in the caucasus, do you know what he found it was doing? i don't want to say that, but i will do it any way. he was laying off soldiers taken prisoner on the road and then he drove his car over their heads. what kind of a person is that? can he be even called a human? but there was a patriot who eliminated him in one of the european capitals, whether he did that of his own volition or not. that is a different question. if i ever, what does that mean? that's a completely different. i mean, i mean is about one year old. like the most of them, an example instead of

a shift additional, he is not just a journalist. i reiterate to you as a journalist who was secretly getting confidential information. yes, it is different, but still, i am talking about other people who are essentially controlled by the us authorities, wherever they are serving a sentence. there is an ongoing dialogue between the special services. this has to be resolved in a calm, responsible, and professional manner as they are keeping in touch. so let them do their work. i do not rule out that the person you referred to, mr garcia, which may return to his mother land by the end of the day. it does not make any sense to keep them in prison in russia. we want the us special services to think about how they can contribute to achieving the goals our special services are pursuing. we are ready to talk more over the talks are underway, and there have been many successful examples of these talks crowned with success. probably this is going to be crowned with success as well, but we have to come to an agreement that will be let them out is present. thank you

. i also want him to return to his homeland at last. i'm absolutely sincere, but let me say once again, the dialog continues to the most public. we are in the things of this nature, the more difficult it becomes to result them. everything has to be done in a calm manner. i wonder if it's, i wonder if that's related with the war though also, i mean, i just want to, i guess i want to ask one more question, which is and maybe you don't want to say so for strategic reasons. but are you worried that what's happening in ukraine could lead to something much larger and much more horrible? and how motivated are you just to call the us government and say, what's come to terms? you have risk of losing your costs a little bit ago. i already said that we did not refuse to talk. we are willing to negotiate. it is the western side, and ukraine is obviously a satellite state of the us. it is evident. i do not want you to take it as if i am

looking for a strong word or an insult, but we both understand what is happening to the financial support. $72000000000.00 us dollars was provided. germany rank 2nd then other european countries come dozens of billions of us dollars or go to ukraine. there is a huge influx of weapons. in this case, you should tell the current ukraine and leadership to stop and come to the negotiating table. resend this absurd decree. we did not refuse. sure, but you already said it. i didn't think you meant it as an insult. think as you already said correctly. it's been reported that ukraine was prevented from negotiating a peace settlement by the farm. british prime minister, acting on behalf of the, by the ministrations of course, our satellite, the countries control small countries that's not new. and that's why i asked about dealing directly with the binding ministration, which is making these decisions. not as presence wednesday of crane. nissan says, well, if this a lensky administration and ukraine refused to negotiate,

i assume that they did it under the instruction from washington. if washington believes it to be the wrong decision to abandon it, let it find a delicate excuse so that no one is insulted. let it come up with a way out. it was not us who made this decision. it was them. so let them go back on it. that is it. however, they made the wrong decision, and now we have to look for a way out of the situation to correct their mistakes if they did it. so let them corrected themselves. we support this listing. so i just wanna make sure i'm not misunderstanding what you're saying. i don't think that i am, i think you're saying you want a negotiated settlement to what's happening in your credit. right. and we made it, we prepared a huge documenting eastern bull that was initial did by the head of the ukranian delegation. he fixed his signature to some of the provisions, not to all of it. he put his signature and then he himself said, we were ready to sign it and the war would have been over long ago. 18 months ago. however, prime minister johnson came,

talked us out of it and we missed that chance to, well, you missed it, you made a mistake, let them get back to that. that is all. why do we have to bother ourselves and correct somebody else's mistakes? i no one can say it is all mistake. it was us to intensify the situation and decided to put an end to the war that started in 2014 and don't boss. as i have already said by means of weapons. let me get back to further in history. i already told you this, we were just discussing it. we let us go back to 1991. when we were promised that nato would not be expanded to 2008 when the doors to nato open to the declaration of state sovereignty of ukraine, declaring ukraine, a neutral state. and let us go back to the fact that nato and us military basis started to appear on the territory of ukraine, creating threats for us. let us go back to coo data in ukraine in 2014. it is pointless though, isn't it? we may go back and forth endlessly, but they stop negotiations. is it a mistake?

yes, correct. that we are ready. what else is needed to do to get to choose humiliating at this point for nato to accept russian control of just what was it 2 years ago? ukrainian territory. yeah, yeah. discuss it all. i said let them think how to do it with dignity. there are options if there is a will up until now that has been the approval and screaming about inflicting a strategic defeat on russia on the battlefield. now they are apparently coming to realize that it is difficult to achieve if possible at all. in my opinion, it is impossible, by definition, it is never going to happen. it seems to me that now those who are in power in the west have come to realize this as well. if so, if the realization has set in, they have to think what to do next. we are ready for this dialogue. would you be willing to say, congratulations, nato, you one and just keep the situation where it is now. right. it's

a big mistake. you know, it is a subject matter for the negotiations. no one is willing to conduct or to put it more accurately stale willing. but do not know how to do it. i know they want. it is not just i see it, but i know they do want it. but they are struggling to understand how to do it. they have driven the situation to the point where we are at it is not us who have done that. it is our partners, opponents who have done that well. now let them think how to reverse the situation . we are not against it. it would be funny if it were not so sad, this endless mobilization in ukraine, the hysteria, the domestic problems, sooner or later, it will, will result in an agreement. you know, this will probably sound strange given the current situation, but the relations between the 2 peoples will be rebuilt anyway. it will take a lot of time, but they will heal. i will give you very unusual examples. there is a come back to encounter on the battlefields. here is a specific example. ukrainian soldiers got encircled. this is an example from real

life. i was soldiers with shouting to them. there is no chance. surrender yourselves come out and you will be lives. suddenly, the ukrainian soldiers was screaming from there in russian. perfect russian saying russians do not surrender. and all of them perished. they still identify themselves as russian. what is happening is to a certain extent, an element of a civil war, which everyone in the west thinks that the russian people have been split by hostilities forever. know, they will be re united, the unity is still there. that's why other ukrainian or sort of things dismantling the ukranian orthodox church because it brings together not only the territory, it brings together all souls. no one will be able to separate the soul. thank you. this person, the

of the every spring and summer, the melting optics move reveals a band of machinery, millions of rusty barrels, and the detritus left by human expansion into this most inaccessible of territories . yes, i used to move. so as a customer, both of us will someone from the lewis at the post the beach and as an issue, calling to us from clean optic, travels the highest island home to the biggest opponent station on the fence of joseph land occupied the go. really asked me for i was my was or more you have to do should. so it means if you have, when you feel when we see lots of money and then put some of the some will stay on . the old stuff was so much you feel like you are a mess almost a little bit. the mean membership when you to, i've got the serial no boys to the middle of please to join me instead of the optic

pioneers main objective was to explore and comcast, these harsh lands they had no time to think about waste management now and. and then because they could remain for centuries. that's my of my choice to fill out pretty at the course you system is the most upon your deal to issue the

lot. the 112011, the largest us, great. ever recorded it in japan is we're interested, a 14 me to, to know me devastates the focus. she must each and you have pallets on the nuclear re, into zip flooded sparking and her risk this stuff and i d b o. anytime in june, it is living in japan and this nice to go to the area of the nuclear meltdown. config ashima immediately to the georgia tech on my side to talk to somebody about the gym

for ya. investigation stats. watch on tv, the 1898 of the united states won the war again, spain and gain control of the philippines. the people of the philippines held that the americans would help over throw spanish rule and to grant independence to the country. but the united states was by no means willing to give freedom to the philippines and side as just another colony. the 1999, the filipinos began armed resistance to the new occupier. american troops were

barely able to occupy the territory of the philippine republic, but that bay 3, it's started a desperate, so reliable r, washington was forced to say new reinforcements and triple the number of its troops on the islands. the us army suffered heavy losses. the americans took 8 out of the population, general jacob smith, in revenge for the guerrilla attack on the garrison in the city of fall on ega. porter to kill everyone over 10 years old. the monstrous gulf of terror, according to the most conservative estimates, lead to the death of about 200000 filipinos, the americans manage to suppress the gorillas only 14 years after the beginning of the war. but the united states was not able to stop the national liberation struggle of the filipino people in 1946. after the decades of the dramatic ordeal, the philippines was finally able to achieve independence.

the russian states never as tired as on the phone in the most sense community best most i'll send, send up the progress be the one else calls question about this, even though we will then in the european union, the kremlin mission, the state on the russians per day and supports the r t. suppose next, even our video agency, roughly all the band on youtube said this is a request which is the.