Skip to main content

tv   News  RT  February 9, 2024 12:00pm-12:31pm EST

12:00 pm
the, the full of up north street you for sure. i was busy that made it think you have to i did upload it or go straight to the american journalist tucker carlson, brings the russian presidents on filtering views straight to western audiences. and delving into the sabotage have been nordstrom, gas pipelines, among many more issues, documents, linux, i'm reading. that was quite an interview. stuff across and share his 1st impressions on the interview with 5 as soon as it gains over 123000000 views on the x platform. you know, it is
12:01 pm
a subject matter for the negotiations. no one is willing to conduct or to put it more accurately, they all willing, but do not know how to do it. and the russian president send signals that he's open to negotiating with western partners in the wide ranging interview. his 1st term journalist says 2021, the i'm rachel ruble live in moscow. you're watching r t international. just hours after being broadcast vladimir putin's 1st interview with the western journalist since 2021 has already been viewed by over 123000000 people on the social media platform x. the sit down with tucker carlson, covered a wide range of topics including the ukraine conflict and one of the most significant acts of industrial terrorism in north stream. blast a cool blow up north stream for you for sure.
12:02 pm
i was busy that day. i need it and you have to have uh, i did not pull up in australia uh, takes, you know, what's the coolest leech and how much would you say he wasn't each? now? you personally may have an alibi, but the c a has no. so tell him i didn't do, do you have evidence that need or to see i didn't mention no, you know, i won't get into the details which people always say in such cases, to look for someone who is interested in this case. we should not only look for someone who is interested, but also for someone who has capabilities because they may be many people interested, but not all of them are capable of thinking to the bottom of the baltic sea and carrying out this explosion. and these 2 components should be connectors introduced, always interested, and who's capable of doing so i'm confused. i mean,
12:03 pm
that's the biggest active industrial terrorism ever. and it's the largest emission of c o 2 in, in history. okay. so if you had evidence and presumably given your security services, rental services, you would, that nato, the u. s. c, i a, the west did this. why wouldn't you present it? and when a propaganda victory, a well, when you pull up identity, which is looking in the order of propaganda, it is very difficult to deceive. so united states, because the united states controls all the world's media and the many european media. you see the ultimate beneficiary of the biggest european media, our american financial institutions of don't you know that so it is possible to get involved in this work. but it is cost prohibitive, so to speak more than we can simply showing the spotlight on our sources of information. and we will not achieve results that the it is clear to the whole
12:04 pm
world. what happened then? even american analysts talk about it directly to the get to choose humiliating at this point for nato to accept russian control of what was 2 years ago. ukrainian territory right? yeah, yeah, no, i said, so live then thing. how to do it with dignity your, there are options if there is a will. randy's nature visual and up until now there is being that oper or, and screaming ability inflict thing is strategic defeat on russia on the non don't fail either just huge scope punish. and yet i see as being and now they are apparently coming to realize that it is difficult to achieve if possible at all, in my opinion. and if i think it is impossible, by definition, it isn't ever going to happen when it comes to show. it seems to me that now those who are in power in the west and have come to realize this as well,
12:05 pm
that's when your visual if so if the realization has set in, they have to think what to do next or we're ready for this dialog. a luxury, what is it? oh, searching of what's there to work out? it's very simple. i repeat just this concept of putting it on medication. we have contacts through various agencies, around schedule, something regarding that i will tell you what we are saying on this matter and what we're conveying to the u. s. leadership. wait week, if you really want to stop fighting, you need to stop supplying weapons, is it will be over within a few weeks that sort of how much does it and then we can agree on some terms. before you do that, stop to me. what's easier? why would i call in the bricks? countries accounted for only 16 percent in 1992, but now their share is greater than that of the g 7. it has nothing to do with the
12:06 pm
events in ukraine. this is due to the trends of global development and world economy, as i mentioned just now. and this is an image symbol. this will keep happening. it is like the rise of the sun. you cannot prevent the sun from rising. you have to adapt to it. you said we can, how do the united states of them as soon as we get with the help of force like sanctions pressure, bombings, and use of armed forces? a cup of coffee, a folder of documents and impressions on quite an interview. tucker carlson reported his reaction immediately after he interviewed the russian president at the kremlin on tuesday. take a look. so we just finished our interview with landmark. we're in an ante room in the kremlin. i'm waiting for a car to come. having a cup of coffee, i'm sitting here with the folder fashion. let me get some documents that
12:07 pm
me got my nighttime reading. that was quite a interview was obviously, is very rude. it by the rejection of the west. united states doesn't like for us with us. government doesn't like russia. the west has determined not to be alive or trusted. this for obvious. that's the whole point of nato, i guess, is to contain russia in this one, but it's very upset about it as i slash when we talked about that as we did, you know, for probably over an hour. so she didn't have a coherent theory that he's going to tell me any way as to why that is, um versus not expansionist power. sorry, you're not supposed to say that because all the tories, the ones, all the liars and the walks around the state department. i want to make him into this, you know, shit, we're imperial, japan. but the truth is that that's just false. it's a stupid action. if you think that was too big already is the biggest land mass of the world. they all have a 150000000 people. us officials have said on the record it,
12:08 pm
and i've said to me and are telling me much people that part of the times have to be rushing, giving up front of me. so it's like if you really think that the condition of peace is the problem is going to give a credit. and then you're, you're like a little tech apart from getting the attention of now more than $100.00. 23000000 people on ex alone. so far, the conversations for the american legacy media into a hysterical frenzy, despite many mainstream media journalists having admitted to seeking a one on one with the bright russian president for years to no avail period came thick and fast at tucker carlson for being granted the exclusive sit down a suit and talks to an american friend and while they may not speak the same language, they also kind of do tucker carlson is lying from the streets of russia. he's what's called a useful idiot. i mean he's like a puppy dog. why he's during this interview now, obviously for the criminal and it makes sense if they want to talk to her house and
12:09 pm
doing the propaganda work of basically russian state media. how did he, how do you think he got that interview? know, quit loving a lot of praise on if you're interested in talking to charles and still doesn't have a job. he's in moscow. how something i hope tucker halston is not a journalist, not even close or from east to european history, to sabotage of the north stream. pipelines tucker carlson, covered a wide range of crucial topics with the russian president, including the potential for negotiations and brushes. diplomatic stands towards western a partners earlier. my colleague, nikki aaron discussed this with our tea correspondence shape, both president putin and portrayed the position of the russian side when it came to negotiations. what, what's the young gave looked like in ukraine? and you know, this is a veteran states. one time a fruit has been at the top of his game for uh, you know, 2 decades now. he's had relationships with numerous presidents of the united states
12:10 pm
. he mentioned them several times by the 1st name, talked about these discussions. well, i'd be very disagreed of course, but also, you know, he's, he's a realist and he understands that the situation of ukraine has such a negative impact potentially have so many careers, even on the nato alliance itself. nicky, if you actually look at this objectively, what would be perceived as a needle defeat and you frame would and many careers if it cost significant instability. and it would leave a lot of people with ag on their face as looking quite you know, um, damage to politically let the president put in related to that. we took the carlson and suggested, you know, i believe they may be looking to negotiate but they don't even know the way back to the negotiating table. they pushed so hard they've and you know, made a rod for their own back would sanctions. they've driven themselves into a corner and know may not know how to get out of that other than that perpetually escalate. i think that's absolutely fascinating. would you be willing to say,
12:11 pm
congratulations, nato. you one and just keep the situation where it is. now, what was the big method to go? you know, it is a subject matter for the negotiations. no one is willing to conduct or to put it more accurately. they all willing, but do not know how to do it. i know they want. it is not just i see it, but i know they do want it, but they are struggling to the stand. how to do it. the language is there from president to the very relaxed, still referring to the west as partners as they formed this very brutal economy, militaristic war against russia. president putin still understands how the game is played. there must be a, a rules out of this conflict for the west if it's, and in a way that will be beneficial to both sides to end the conflict. it's um, you know, we think we use to president piercing, be betrayed in the west in mainstream media, or someone who's so filled with haines. and yet in this interview with it, he spoke more about inviting unity rather than that accelerating. you know, war and hostility can you walk us through that face?
12:12 pm
yeah, and i think this was particularly a part that when it came to ad breaks and multi polarity, i think, took across and sort of carried the questioning about breaks the rise of the global . so it's a, as one of adversarial movements that it was, you know, something that was going to press the west and present, putting, again, stepping in to say, well, it's not about, it's not about add, you know, to add the 2 sides of the brain. but the go to work and harm you really remarkable analogy. you really think it on his fees. and again, he sort of related that idea that this isn't just about you find that the global salesman brakes has been developing long before the, you find new conflict occurred that, you know, chinese, the chinese economy was, was burgeoning. and that they were wanting to do business in a different way, if you like. the idea of divide and conquer was passing and united and prosper was, was coming. and again, we see president putin as suggesting that, that the vision of these 2 spears of the brain,
12:13 pm
it would signify an illness as unity that everyone kind of work together. we kind of find solutions and we kind of push forward. i think that was a remarkable solution. listen, you have said that the world is breaking into 2 hemispheres. a human brain is divided into 2 hemispheres. one is responsible for one type of activities. the other one is more about creativity and so on. but it is still one in the same head for the world should be a single hole. security should be shared rather than meant for the golden 1000000000. that is the only scenario where the world could be stable, sustainable, and predictable. until then, while the head is split into 2 parts, it is an illness, a serious adverse conditions. it is a period of a severe disease that the world is now going through. so, again, mazda full diplomacy from president, plenty of space here to apportion blame. you know, to accelerate things,
12:14 pm
we will do this, we will do that. you've done this to us what a completely different approach a religious pragmatic approach from present showed a scale and how he has led russia through some of its most difficult days and times after the class of the soviet union president put in a force credited with transform of the russian economy and society in many ways. and one of the scales, he has his discretion. many times during the conversation took her cross and asked him what they say, what the present point and say, and president putin as saying, well, you need to ask them that. i'm not going to disclose these private conversation that shows great skill and respect for who the people are now, funding this conflict and you play, you gotta compare this performance from a lot him or food. and including his masterful a recollection of russian history at the beginning, no notes, no prompt or have to ask yourself what a western leader be able to do that of course, joe biden, at times even differentiate between egypt and mexico. it seems minutes after been challenged on his health and as, as well,
12:15 pm
being overall i think walk the circle message here and we'll, that's going to be trawled over. we've seen john kirby say, like if you're going to watch this interview and you know, don't listen to anything that i'm approved and says you can absolutely bet your bottom dollar. the analyst and the intelligence services on in the political loop leeds around the world or analyzing in granular detail the cellphone messages that were given by loudon recruitment during the speech and over well, many those messages where it's, which are our doors that can be opened. there is a positive reconciliation in partnership. thank you. i think it's absolutely remarkable. joe old man, host of the conservative daily podcast shared his impressions on the interview that has made headlines. somebody talked about the fact that they put in did not have a problem during there's no tal prompt or there's no notes. he didn't sit there and go, but let me check with somebody else. he had a great understanding of history and not just the recent history, but the history that went back hundreds of years and a use that for
12:16 pm
a justification, not a justification, but an understanding of what culturally step man, it's actually enter into ukraine's. there's a lot to unpack over this 2 hours, but i do believe that as you look at it, it's very difficult for the emperor to have clothes, the united states and for people not to look at this and go, maybe we should be taking your larger look at the right, it apparatus that we have in our country because i will tell you something about tucker cross and the character that that man has to stay in on the beach knowing that what he is saying and that he's doing this interview in order to lead truth not just be heard by americans about people around the world is tantamount to the fact that he was willing to make the ultimate sacrifice. and whether that is freedom or his life, he recognizes that it's necessary and if not him who and if not now when we've got to get to a place where we actually break down the barriers of the evil that has actually taken a grip on our society. all over the world. all right, let's cross live now to then are back here, pan, parliament and member for the alternative for germany party. i didn't order to have
12:17 pm
you on the program with us. uh, let me put and discuss the nord stream pipeline blast and berlin's in action for this case, when the country's interests were clearly heard, what's your take on what the russian president had to say? well, i friendly very carefully. there isn't a single thing. i disagree with, he was quite clear about kenny dodge a separate charge of tech, and he said the job would be, it has a very unfortunate robert to be precise. and i think he was precise. he said the german political establishment had a tendency to identify or we identify. we define national interest tubs of the collective interest of the west. and germany. was it, in this sense, a kind of a country that shows to act against its own interest. so i think that's all true reference to the russian president also talked about european countries primarily
12:18 pm
in germany, caving into us influence on many global issues. so when you talk about germany and acting in, in a way that's not on, it's in its own interest, you agree with the rest and present president standpoint on that as well? or maybe i overlooked something, but i'm not quite so sure why he was so expressive. i think it was more explicit, oppressive bluetooth is more explicit in germany, in saying that job, he wasn't a curious, very strange state of self denied that much. the increased the national interest side, so far as the north stream to voice concerned. clearly it was k beginning, so that to us interest. but i do not see. i mean, germany has to do on the 6 of sacrificing of the neighborhood may acting against it to national interest interest for 15 years. they had lots of
12:19 pm
examples. i do not think that you can teach and every one of these examples we can play with the united states. i think the problem lies more with the masses, or lack of a sense of the reality of r o d, don't ship that with the united states. although i agree with you that there are clear instances such as energy policy and the destruction of the north stream to a pipe, not i, where the germans simply active likes made. so the united states, you know, good are there was quite a lot of backlash toward this interview even before it was released, especially in the united states. but i'm wondering how is the interview being viewed in germany? well, i haven't really had a chance to gauge property binion, i've read it in full enough being extremely impressed. i mean, that's
12:20 pm
a very long part about the russian history. now, best approaches is a great to ext uh, dropped the subject of the russian history. then i and so i cannot read the comments on that, but there's an equal the long section about a whole variety of subject subjects such as well the call to be a g of politics. the big ticket situation to go to be a conflict, a super ukraine, even hungry claims, want to a certain parts of mother ukraine. and my 1st reaction to reading your president's comments. yeah, well it was said there was a very new all of that and stuff of mine, someone who isn't giving way isn't given to wild exaggeration, someone with a very sofa appreciation of, uh, the main outlines of, well, just of, of, as well as development right now and the economics do less than other areas. i wish
12:21 pm
we had leadership like that. i think it clearly there's a lot of interest in this b interview. it's gotten more than 120000000 views on the social media side ex, uh, several 1000000 on youtube as well. not to mention how many people watched it on tucker carlson. uh, website, european politicians. the earlier had flooded the idea of sanctions against tucker carlson for even doing the interview. do you think it's something as harsh as sanctions could be a real possibility? uh, what kind of official reaction do you think we could see now that the interview has dropped as well? i see anything as possibly but today's climate and it is curious said so i can see why they are doing that because the last big they want is the president booting to be given the jobs, explain things is side of the story. at considerable length in a comment and ends with a very intelligence interviewer,
12:22 pm
the language of west and the does have to be trying to create the image of a bad, a wildly out of control. and clearly the to interview refutes this quite resolved a d and was totally given you my impression of what the president said. i'm quite sure that i'm not the only one who would react to this specially if that use of goals. the last thing i'll western the does want because it runs counter to the image, say, a draw on the president to did for us now. now that president put in has laid out his reasons for why the conflict. a new crane is taking place for a western audience. do you think it will have any impact on western support for ukraine to the? well, i think here um, the position of the united states is decisive. that in a sense,
12:23 pm
the present administration has already, i mean it's an open question as to whether or not the us is a stop did submit it to the financial aid for your grade for good, or whether it's going to change its mind to some extent. but what's clear is that the us with the district doesn't have the end of the dissolves to provide in depth and it's held for you. great, that's changed. i think the situation quite remarkably now the europe is at present just a nose they, they charge, they will step in, but they cannot a 4 digit over to a, over a sustained period. this time they will no longer be waiting 2 or 4 days. so i think we already seen change. it's not yet immediately fell out in ukraine. brothers, we committed to a situation that is already deteriorating for you. great. and ukrainians will be
12:24 pm
reconsidering differentiation. i think we are very gradual. they heading into the direction where i think it's not altogether justified. and i seem to think that b west will eventually come to the view that sometimes these negotiations would have to be entered because the decisive effect. yeah. are the november us election. these go the way they seem to be going that this process could be expedited, quite consider. all right, well, live with are going to back here, paying that problem, that number for the alternative for germany party. great to have you on the pressure the war between israel and how mos in gaza has divided opinions and caused a turbulence across the region. some western politicians have drawn and comparisons between our mazda and isis, but according to a representative whole of 16 arab countries released by the error of center,
12:25 pm
washington dc. more than 80 percent of respondents at home us is not similar to isis. 10 percent fewer participants said to us policy toward the warren gods have little harm washington's image. and the reason in the region and a bit more than 70 percent said their views on us policy in the air abroad has become more negative since the war began. all right, let's cross live now to mohammed shadow senior professor in middle eastern politics mohammed. good to have you on with us. as some western politicians have drawn comparisons between our mazda and isis, as i mentioned there yet, the slightest poll says a very different picture. when it comes to opinions among arabs, despite the picture painted in western media, what do you make of those statistics as well? i think 1st of all, this is a wrong kind of slow comparison because uh, isis is a different organization. uh, using violence and killing people for a g r o g,
12:26 pm
which it has in mind. well as to how much is the google for them fighters or trying to get independence for the country and to have a country if the there was one and there are different in there. uh so you and they are defending the people. uh, so the comparison says, $100.00. so i think that should be reviewed on the issue. how much should be seen in a different slide for the moment? because they are trying to get an independent country and to have their own. a place where to list a public opinion. and each of the countries has also shown a growing vision of the palestinian cause as an error of issue. is this a sign of growing unity among arab states against israel and us policy? a lot of people are really united when it comes to what's happening in the gaza strip. the old believe that it is the general side on the thousands of
12:27 pm
people being killed. and um, uh that this war is going on endlessly with the help of the united states. and that this should come to an end and that there shouldn't be in the end for once, for all the creation on foot bodies, simeon states for bodies to unions with the real borders and the real a piece in the region. so maybe the data people who disagree with their leaders who are trying to find different way to approach the problem. but the people typically believe that this should be 2 states and the, the probably see this should have the right to have their own state. and they shouldn't be hoped and because i shouldn't be rebuilt and the people should be allowed to go back to the places where they live. but in terms of prospects for
12:28 pm
peace in the guys, the complex. now more than half of respondents reported that there are certain there is no possibility for peace with israel. do you think this is a cause for pessimism when it comes to long term resolution of this conflict? so i think, well, there is this investment every aspect of politics, but i think there should be a 2 states in the region. there should be peace. these right is come up live. uh, and definitely more on the regions. when you look at the, we are not we, it's a regional award. it's not, it's not on. do you guys i it's in in loveland on you've seen young man, you've seen you rockets in syria, so you've got to live forever in this kind of situation. so peace is the only solution and the only solution to have peace is to have a negotiation with the point of stimulus. and one of the punishing and simple sure yet with in the 1st place is how much you cannot describe how much, how much is very important in the gaza strip. did it present the people because of
12:29 pm
script and do the fighting for the independence of the police and even people? majority of respondents also reported they believe us media is biased in favor of israel. they think this shows a growing distrust of mainstream western media when it comes to coverage of global events, particularly israel, their israel, home, us war. so i think the western media is biased for the moment. the have double standards when it comes to by the sign and to when they're dealing with israel, the afraid of anti semitism, and some of them aren't even afraid of the united states backlash on them. and i think the media should do the view. it's the approach to the, the war in the middle east for the moment because i think there are, uh, nevertheless, some people give their views freely in the west. and we kind
12:30 pm
of say that it's a general so we can say the blankets, you know, are things that i think that a lot of people believe that the media should have your, its way or for the point in the war. and they showed up on this idea of uh, double standards when it comes with a bunch of things. and what about the truth that's been proposed by guitar? do you think that that will happen? well, i'm not sure. we the, the, the police doing in a situation right now and the mom from bomb. and so these, right, these, so for off i have all the cities on the border. i don't see any transfer this piece or, or for this to choose to happen for the moment. i think nothing, you know, who doesn't want this to happen, because if it, it happens, it means it's the end of him. it would be uh, he would go to prison, he will have to respond to a lot of things.

11 Views

info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on