negotiate with russia, but how are we going to negotiate if he still bade himself and everyone to do this? we know that he is putting forward some ideas about this settlement. but in order to agree on something, we need to have a dialogue is not that right well, but you wouldn't be speaking to your printing present. you'd be speaking to the american president. when was the last time i spoke to joe, but i cannot remember when i talked to him. i do not remember we can look it up. i'm just trying to remember. no, why do i have to remember everything? i have my own things to do for you have domestic political affairs while he's funding the war that you're fighting. so i would think that would be memorable. so don't ship. well, yes, he funds, but i talked to him before the special military operation, of course, and i said to him, then, by the way, i will not go into details. i never do. but i said to him, then i believe that you are making a huge mistake of historic proportions by supporting everything that is happening there in ukraine by pushing russia away. i told him, told him repeatedly,

by the way, i think that would be correct if i stop here with can you have somebody come yet? what did he say that i need to ask him please. it is easier for you. you are a citizen of the united states, go and ask him. it is not appropriate for me to comment on our conversation. but you haven't spoken to him since before february of 2022. you know, we haven't spoken in certain contexts of being maintained. those speaking of which do you remember what i told you about my proposal to work together on a missile defense system? yes, no. you can ask all of them. one of them are safe and sound. thank god. the former president come to lisa is safe and sound and i think mr. gates and the current director of the central intelligence agency, mr. burns. but then i'm pass that to russia in my opinion, a very successful and pass it up. they were all witnesses to these conversations. ask them same here. if you are interested in what mr. president finding responded to me, ask him at any rate, i talk to him about it. i'm definitely interested,

but from the outside it seems like this could devolve or evolve into something that brings the entire world into conflict and could initiate some nuclear launch. and so why don't you just call by me and say, let's work this out. let's see, what is it, what does it work out? so it's very simple. i repeat, we have context through various agencies. i will tell you what we are saying on this matter and what we are conveying to the us leadership. if you really want to stop fighting, you need to stop supplying weapons. it will be over within a few weeks. that's it. and then we can agree on sometimes before you do that, stop what's easier? why would i call him? what should i talk to him about? full beg him for what you're going to deliver, such and such weapons to ukraine. oh, i'm afraid, i'm afraid, please don't. what is there to talk about? do you think nato is worried about this becoming a global war or

a nuclear conflict? at least that's what they're talking about. and they are trying to intimidate their own population with an imaginary russian threat. this is an obvious fact and thinking people, not philistines, but thinking people analysts, those who are engaged in real politics, just smart people. this done perfectly well. this is a fake. they are trying to fuel the russian threat. the thread, i think you're referring to is a russian invasion of poland lab fee, expansionist behavior is. can you imagine a scenario where you sent russian troops cold only in one case which we've pulled into tax russia. why? because we have no interest in folding like the or anywhere else. why would we do that? we simply don't have any interest. it's just the threat monitoring. well, the argument, i know you notice is that well, he invaded ukraine. she has territorial aims across the continent and you're saying

unequivocally, you don't do now. it is absolutely out of the question. you just don't have to be any kind of analyst. it goes against common sense to get involved in some kind of global war, and a global war will bring all of humanity to the brink of destruction. it's obvious. there are certainly means of deterrence. they have been scaring everyone with us all along. tomorrow. russia will use tactical nuclear weapons tomorrow, russia will use that no the day after tomorrow. so what? these are just horror stories for people in the street in order to exploit additional money from us taxpayers and europeans taxpayers in the confrontation with russia. in the ukranian theater of wars. the goal is to weaken russia as much as possible. one of our senior united states senators from the state of new york, chuck schumer said yesterday, i believe that we have to continue to fund the ukrainian efforts for us

soldiers. citizens could wind up fighting there. how do you assess that? this is a publication and a cheap publication. if that i do not understand why american soldiers should fight in ukraine. there are most scenarios from the united states. they're, the biggest number of mercenaries comes from poland, with most scenarios from the united states. and 2nd, place and mercenary is from georgia in 3rd place as well. if somebody has the desire to send regular troops, that would certainly bring humanity on the brink of a very serious global conflict. this is obvious to the united states need this. what for thousands of miles away from your national territory. so you don't, you have anything better to do? you have issues on the border issues with migration issues, with the national debt. more than $33.00 trillion dollars. you have nothing better to do. so you should fight in ukraine. wouldn't it be better to negotiate with russia? make an agreement already understanding the situation that is developing today. realizing that russia will fight for its interest to the end and realizing this

actually return to common sense, start respecting our country and its interests and look for certain solutions. it seems to me that this is much smarter and more rational, who blow up north stream. you for sure. i was busy that made it and you have to have uh, i did not pull up your last name. uh it takes you to know what you personally may have an alibi, but with the c i a has no such alibi. did you have evidence that nato, or did it matter? you know, i won't get into the details, but people always say in such cases, look for someone who is interested in this case, we should not only look for someone who is interested, but also for someone who has capabilities. because there may be many people interested, but not all of them are capable of thinking to the bottom of the baltic sea and carrying out this explosion. these 2 components should be connected, who is interested and who is capable of doing it. but i'm confused. i mean,

that's the biggest active industrial terrorism ever. and it's the largest emission of c o 2 and it has 3. okay, so if you had evidence and presumably given your security services, rental services, you would, that nato, the u. s. c, i a, the west did this. why wouldn't you present it? and when a propaganda victory, when you put into words propaganda, it is very difficult to defeat the united states because the united states controls all the world's media and many european media. the ultimate beneficiaries of the biggest european media are american financial institutions. don't you know that so it is possible to get involved in this work, but it is cost prohibitive, so to speak. we can simply shine the spotlight on our sources of information and we will not achieve results. it is clear to the whole world what happened and even american analysts talk about it directly. it's true. yeah. say. but here's the

question. you able to answer it. you worked in germany. famously. the germans clearly know that there natal partner did this, but they ended in damage their economy greatly. it may never recover. why are they being silent about it? that's very confusing to me. why wouldn't the germans say something about it? the police also confused as many of those we knew there, but today's german leadership is guided by the interest of the collective west, and that's rather than it's national interest. otherwise, it is difficult to explain the logic of their action or inaction. you mentioned after all, it is not only about north stream one which was blown up, and north stream too was damaged. but one pipe is safe and sound and gas can be supplied to europe through it. with germany does not open it. we already please. there is another route through poland called them all europe, which also allows for a large flow. poland has closed it, but poland picks from the german hand. it receives money from pen european funds,

and germany is the main donor to these can you repeat and funds? germany feeds poland to a certain extent, and they close the route to germany. why? i don't understand ukraine to which the governments simply weekends and give money to money is the 2nd sponsor after the united states in terms of financial aid to ukraine. there are 2 gas moves through ukraine. they simply closed one route, the ukrainians, opened the 2nd route and please get gas from russia. they do not open it. why don't the germans say look guys, we give you money and weapons open up the valve, please. that's a guess from russia pass through for us. we are buying liquefied gas at exorbitant prices in europe, which brings the level of our competitiveness and economy in general, down to 0. do you want us to give you money? let us have a decent existence to make money for our economy, because this is where the money we give you comes from. they refuse to do so. why

ask them that is what it is like in their heads. those are highly incompetent people. well, maybe the world is breaking into 2 hemispheres. one of the chief energy, the other without. and i want to ask you that if you for now multi polar world, obviously we are can you describe the blocks of alliances who, who, who is in each side. do you think? just listen to the news. you have said that the world is breaking into 2 hemispheres. a human brain is divided into 2 hemispheres. one is responsible for one type of activities. the other one is more about creativity and so on. but it is still one in the same head. the world should be a single hold. security should be shared, rather than meant for the golden 1000000000. that is the only scenario where the world could be stable, sustainable, and predictable. until then, while the head is split into 2 parts, it is an illness, a serious adverse condition. it is a period of

a severe disease that the world is now going through. but i think that thanks to honest journalism, this work is akin to work of the doctors. this could somehow be remedied to this. what, let's just give one example the, the us dollar, which has kind of united the world in a lot of ways, maybe not to your advantage, but certainly ours is that going away as the reserved currency, the become the universally accepted currency. how have sanctions do you think changed the dollars place in the world that the, you know, to use the dollar as a tool of foreign policy struggle is one of the biggest strategic mistakes made by the us political leadership. the dollar is the corner stone of the united states power. i think everyone understands very well that no matter how many dollars are printed, they are quickly dispersed all over the world. inflation in the united states, as minimum it is about 3 or 3.4 percent, which is,

i think totally acceptable for the us. but they won't stop printing. what does the debt of $33.00 trillion dollars tell us about? it is about the emission. nevertheless, it is the main weapon used by the united states to preserve its power across the world. as soon as the political leadership decided to use the us dollar as a to of political struggle, a blow was built to this american tower. i would not like to use any strong language, but it is a stupid thing to do and a great mistake. to look at what is going on in the world, even the united states allies are now downsizing, that dollar reserves. seeing this, everyone starts looking for ways to protect themselves. but the fact that the united states applies restrictive measures to certain countries, such as placing restrictions on transactions, freezing assets, etc, causes great concern and sends a signal to the whole. well, what did we have here? on to 2020, to about 80 percent of russia's foreign trade transactions were made in us dollars and euro's us dollars accounted for approximately 50 percent of our transactions

with the countries while currently it is down to 13 percent. it was not us who find the use of the us dollar. we had no such intention. it was the decision of the united states to restrict our transactions in us dollars. i think it is a complete foolishness from the point of view of the interest of the united states itself and its taxpayers. as it damages the us economy, undermines the power of the united states across the world. by the way, are transactions in un accounted for about 3 percent to day? 34 percent of our transactions are made in roubles and about as much a little over 34 percent in un. why did the united states do this? my only guess is self conceited. they probably thought it would lead to a full collapse, but nothing collapse, more of other countries including oil producers of thinking of and already accessing payments for oil and you on. do you even realize what is going on or not? does anyone in the united states realize this? what are you doing? you are cutting yourself off. all experts say this,

ask any intelligent and thinking personally in the united states, what the dollar means for the us. you are killing it with your own hands. i mean, i think that's a fair, so i think there's a fair assessment. the question is, what comes next page? and maybe you trade one colonial power for another much less sentimental and forgiving colonial power. i mean, or is the, the, the bricks for example, in danger? of being completely dominated by the chinese, the chinese economy. you know, way this not good for their sovereignty as to worry about that. it, it's, it's just a special can. i'm frustrating is we have heard those big events stories before. it is a movement story. we are neighbors with china. you cannot choose neighbors. just as you cannot choose close relatives. we share a border of 1000 kilometers within. this is number one. second, we have a centuries long history of co existence. we are used to it. 3rd, china is foreign policy, philosophy is not aggressive. its idea is to always look for compromise. and we can

see that the next point is as follows. we always told the same boogeyman story and here it goes again. the you from mystic form, but it is still the same boogeyman storing. the cooperation with china keeps increasing. the pace at which china's cooperation with europe is growing is higher and greater than that of the growth of chinese russian cooperation. ask europeans, aren't they afraid? they might be, i do not know, but they are still trying to access china's market at all costs, especially now that they are facing economic problems. chinese businesses are also exploring the european market to chinese businesses have small presence in the united states. yes, the political decisions are such that they are trying to limit the cooperation with china. it is to your own detriment, mister tucker, that you are limiting cooperation with china. you are hurting yourself. it is a delicate matter and there are no silver bullet solutions. just as it is with the

dollar. so before introducing any illegitimate sanctions, illegitimate in terms of the charter of the united nations, one should think very carefully. so for decision makers, this appears to be a problem. so you said a moment ago that the world would be a lot better if it weren't broken into competing alliances. if there was cooperation globally. one of the reasons you don't have that is because the current american administration is dead set against you. do you think if there were a new administration after joe biden, that you would be able to re establish communication with the us government, or does it not matter who the press service should schedule if i was tell you, but let me finish the previous thoughts. we together with my colleague and friend, president, she didn't things set a goal to reach $200000000.00 of mutual trade with china. this year we have exceeded this levels, according to our fee goes our bilateral trade with china. total's already 213000000000. and the chinese statistics says it is $240000000000.00. one more

important thing, our trade is well balanced, mutually complementary in high tech, energy, scientific research and development. it is very balanced as for bricks where russia took over the presidency this year. the bricks, countries are by and large, developing very rapidly. so if memory serves me right back in 1992, the share of the g 7 countries in the world economy amounted to 47 percent. whereas in 2022 it was down to i think, a little over 30 percent. the bricks, countries accounted for only 16 percent in 1992, but now their share is greater than that of the g 7. it has nothing to do with the events and ukraine. this is due to the trends of global development and world economy that i mentioned just now. and this is inevitable, this will keep happening. it is like the rise of the sun. you cannot prevent the sun from rising. you have to adapt to it. how does the united states adapt with the

help of force sanctions, pressure bombings and use of armed forces? this is about self conceit. your political establishment does not understand that the world is changing under objective circumstances. and in order to preserve your level, even if someone aspires pardon me to the level of dominance, you have to make the right decisions in a confidence in timely manner and speaking such a brutal actions, including with regard to russia and say, other countries are counter productive this is an obvious fact, it has already become evident. you just ask me if another leader comes and changes something. it is not about the lead to. it is not about the personality of a particular person. i had a very good relationship with, say, bush, i know that in the united states he was portrayed as some kind of a country boy who does not understand much. i assure you that is not the case. i think he made a lot of mistakes with regard to russia to what i told you about the 2008 and the decision invoke arrest to open the knock those doors to for ukraine and so on. that

happened during his presidency. he actually exercised pressure on the european spot in general. so on the personal human level, i had a very good relationship with him. he was no worse than any other american or russian or european politicians. i assure you he understood what he was doing as well as others. as far as i had such a personal relationships with trump as well. it is not about the personality of the leader. it is about the elite mindset. if the idea of domination at any cost based also on forceful actions dominates the american society, nothing will change. it will only get worse. but if in the end, one comes to the awareness that the world has been changing due to objective circumstances. and that one should be able to adapt to them in time using the advantages that the us still has today. then to have something may change, china's economy has become the 1st economy in the world, in purchasing power parity industry in terms of volume it over to the us. a long

time ago. the usa comes 2nd, sustained india, one and a half 1000000000 people naturally. and then japan with russia in the 5th place for us it was the 1st economy in europe last year when, despite all the sections and restrictions here. is this no ma'am, from your point of view, do sanctions restrictions and possibility of payments in dollars actually being cut off from is with surfaces, sanctions against our ship carrying oil in new sanctions against airplanes, sanctions and everything everywhere. the largest number of sanctions in the world which are applied are applied against russia. and we have become europe's 1st economy during this time. the tools that the us use is don't work. well, one has to think about what to do. if this realization comes to the ruling elite, then yes, even the 1st person of the state will act in and sit pitching of what the voters and the people who make decisions at various levels expect from this person. then maybe something will change you're describing to different systems. you say that

the leader acts in the interest of the voters. but you also say these decisions are not made by the leader. they're made by the ruling classes. you've run this country for so long, you know, and all these american pressures, what are those powers that are being in the united states? do you think like, who actually makes the decisions? i don't know. america is a complex country. conservative on the one hand, rapidly changing on the other. it's not easy for us to sort it all out. who makes decisions in the election see my edition? is it possible to understand this? when each state has its own legislation in the state regulates itself, someone can be excluded from the elections that the state level. it is a 2 stage electoral system. it is very difficult for us to understand. certainly, there are 2 parties that have dominated the republicans and the democrats, and within this party system, the senses that make decisions, that prepared decisions and then look at why, in my opinion, off to the collapse of the soviet union, such an erroneous crude,

completely unjustified policy of pressure action was pursued against russia. after all, this is a policy refresher which nato expansion or support from the separatists and the corpus creation of a missile defense system. these are all elements of pressure, pressure, pressure, pressure, and then dragging ukraine into nato is all about pressure. pressure. pressure is why i think among other things because excessive production capacities were created during the confrontation with the soviet union. they were many cent is created and specialists on the soviet union who could not do anything else. it seemed to them they convinced the political leadership. it is necessary to continue chiseling russia to try to break it up. to create on this territory several clauses, a state entities and to subdue them in a divided form to use their combined potential for the future struggle with china. this is a mistake, including the excessive potential of those who work for the confrontation with the

soviet union. it is necessary to get rid of this. there should be new, fresh forces, people who look into the future and understand what is happening in the world. look at how indonesia is developing 600000000 people. where can we get away from that? to say and, you know, with this we just have to assume that indonesia will enter. it is already in the club of the world's leading economies, no matter who likes or dislikes it. yes, we understand and are aware that in the united states, despite all the economic problems, the situation is still normal with the economy growing decently. the g d p is growing by 2.5 percent. if i am not mistaken, but if we want to insure the future, then we need to change our approach to what these changes. as i already said, the world would never the less change, regardless of how the developments in ukraine and the world is changing. in the united states themselves, experts writes that the united states are none the less gradually changing their

position in the world. it is your expert to write that i just read them. the only question is how this would happen painfully and quickly or gently and gradually. and this is written by people who are not anti american, they simply follow global development trends. that's it. and in order to assess them and change policies, we need people who think, look forward to analyze and recommend certain decisions at the level of political leaders. the, [000:00:00;00]

the israel to itself selfish interests is not just destroying its rep is not only destroying the so called legitimacy as well in the eyes of the world. but it's destroying the whole of the western project of all of the notion of western civilization and somehow western civilization being exceptional for the greatest civilization. now people are looking down at the when

the, the russian states never, i've started as i'm one of the most sense community best. most all sense and up

in the system must be the one else holes. question about this, even though we will then in the european union, the kremlin move. yep. mission the state on the rush coding and split the r t. suppose next. even our video agency, roughly all the band on youtube, the services for the question, did you say a request for check the by the early 1950. can you became one of the centers of resistance to colonialism in africa?

the british invaders infringed on the most basic rights of the local population. great britain pursued the policy of squeezing out the local population from their indigenous lands. the best airable areas were given to white farmers, dooming canyon step 5 or de and hunger. this caused the sharp protest of the peasants and led to the emerging of the mile mile movement, which started the fight against the invaders. the rebels called themselves canyon, land and freedom army. this spiritual leader of the movement with the anti colonial active as jo, mo kenyata, the freedom fighters used guerrilla tactics and attacked the individual units of the radius troops. the latter responded with mass of air, race and artillery effects. wind, suppressing the uprise of london relied on the maximum cruelty over $50000.00 kenyans were killed. about 300000 people were thrown into prisons and concentration camps,

where tortures no way inferior enrolls the to the nazis was widely practiced. the veracity of the colonial list only led the temporary success. in 1963, the british empire had to recognize the independence of gain. yeah. however, the colonial raising left behind a trail of blood and wounds that canyon nation has not recovered from on sale. now, [000:00:00;00]

the, [000:00:00;00] the stopped the coffins interview with ladder reporting as wrapped up more than 150000000 views on the x platform. a low exclusive strip down covers a wide range of topics, including the queen conflict and the shifting global balance of power. you'll be watching the final part of this much dissipated interview. now on our team the i just have to ask you, you've said clearly that nato expansion for it is