on the script and the reason the tomato allies distance themselves from the idea of sending troops to keep you as the french president says, he cannot roll out european boots on ukrainian soil. and moscow says my frond doesn't realize the significance of what he's saying. the russian defense minister says russian troops have liberated 3 residential areas on the dentist's front in one week. adding that ukraine in turn is using its remaining reserves to prevent collapse, plus instead of making a collective effort to de escalate the us, something you can have chosen a forceful response. pressure is foreign minister warns that continued violence in and around the guys that will create additional political and military risk in the region. he said that during a meeting with the many prime minister in moscow,

the you are watching r t international. i'm rachel ruble live in moscow. natal chief in suttonberg says the alliance is not considering sending troops to ukraine, that comes a med reaction from russia to friendship presidents and manual my cons. suggestion there could be direct involvement in the hop conflicts. mazda says it's such a move could lead to no good results. you know, we are well aware of mac cross position on the needs to inflict the strategic defeat on russia and so on. we have noticed the facts and that the topic of sending troops to the crane was indeed discussed. we have also taken note that there was a very rich pallet of opinions on this matter. indeed, there was no consensus great party, a number of countries participating in the paris event, remain sober in their assessment of the potential risks of subtractions and the

potential risk of being directly involved in a hot conflict. well, out of all the leaders of all the natal member states macro on the is the only one who's suggested this plan, this idea that sending nato troops to crane to fight there is not off the table a table gets as well. everything was this cause this evening in a very open and direct manner. there is no consensus to day to officially openly and with endorsements and troops on the ground. but in terms of dynamics, nothing should be ruled out. we will do everything necessary to ensure that russia cannot win this war. people who are assessed for administer certainly elaborate of explain the reasoning behind the shocking proposal as a means for the west to try and compensate for the lack of results that the ukrainians are seeing on the battlefield right now. but at any rate, a proposal like this is enough to set off alarm bells, but coming from the head of a major western state, it set the main stream media into a frenzy with headlines,

talking about potential world war 3 erupt. and what about other european leaders? what are they being say? well many of them are not happy about the tone of monday's meeting. we for example, heard from slovakia as prime minister who said that piece was not even mentioned. there are several put, it was completely bull like meaning to support the war at all costs and to do everything you know, is it for the was it continued? i was very surprised that there was not a single was about any piece plan or piece of they should to. i can confirm that the all countries that are all ready to send their own soldiers to ukraine all the say never so long case among them. they are also countries that say that this proposal should be considered all government. this piece oriented rejects the continuation of the war, will not sound weapons to ukraine and will focus on severely on projects of the apple settled. and that same realm of thought we heard from hungry as for administer, who said that there are

a flat outside that his country is not going to be under any circumstances sending troops to ukraine. this anti war message from slovakia and hungry comes as no surprise. what are we hearing from the other european countries in support of ukraine? well, even the more pro, key of figures, like germany's chancellor, the leadership of the european commission and even the secretary general of nato himself. they're all saying that they're not going to be sending troops to ukraine and many other nato states. sort of that, the very least saying that the, the block is divided on this outline, this idea really, let's take a listen to what they said. there was a heated discussion about sending soldiers to you frame, and there was no absolute mutual understanding on this issue. there are different opinions, but i want to emphasize that there are absolutely no such decisions. right now, we are busy sending advanced systems from sweden to ukraine in various ways. as many other countries are doing, it's a completely different matter. there is also no such demand on the part of ukraine

. this issue is irrelevant. i want to assure you that there's no question of sending european nato forces inside ukraine. an issue that for greece does not exist and i believe doesn't exist for the great majority of our colleagues. and let's trip to the average citizen here. don't old. what has the reaction being from the french public to them across states? but because, you know, sometimes it's usually a disconnect between the leadership what the leadership of the country wants and what the people want. what have you seen? well, it seems that people are just as afraid as the kind of fear we've been seeing. and these mainstream media headlines, a lot of stuff has been echoing between those headlines and what people are saying specifically talking about fears of world war 3, sending french ground troops to ukraine. chrome is crazy, completely crazy. it would obviously be war with russia. world war 3, sending troops to ukraine would make us belligerence. war against russia would be madness. this belligerent verbal escalation by a nuclear power against another major nuclear power is already an air responsible

act. manual the chrome explain vote, but it's our children's lives. he's talking about so carelessly. it's a question of peace over in our country now in terms of the actual idea of sending troops to ukraine, although there might not be consensus among european leaders. there certainly is a consensus among the general population across the west, but that consensus is absolutely against sending troops to ukraine. we've got statistics from polls here, sending us troops to ukraine, and people who strongly support that that's the only 6 percent of the population. well, strongly opposes 41 percent in terms of europe sending uh, troops to ukraine. support for that in germany is 13 percent. i mean the highest we have here is in sweden 33 percent, which is still extremely low. when you take the population as a whole, so there's no doubt that there's very little supports in the west or among the general population for starting a potential world war 3. no, all right,

well discuss these developments. i'm crossing to a panel of guess political analysts and veteran war zone correspondence, elijah magneer, medical consultants and human rights defender are no delay. and the journalist and so she's like, affairs expert, how me to con must rekey great to have you on with us today, elijah, let me start with you. excuse me. what do you make of the french presidents message about potentially putting boots on the ground and you kind of what reaction was background expecting here? thank you for having me. what 1st of all, we need to look at who is saying that the french president as one by 24 percent of the votes on the 1st round. and he came to power, not because the population wants him, because the population didn't want to use the opposition side. that is not in the pen and the rifle and candidate. so he's someone very frustrated with the french people. and he has been working very hard to a degree,

a larger gap between the interest of the french population and to europe and population. and the eh, and he's emission. and because of that, we have seen, he's a finance minister saying that you are being rich. people have $32000000000.00 in the bank that he needs to borrow that money for buying weapons to funds. so if his idea to send troops to ukraine is to stop preparing the ground, posting all the savings of the europeans, and go and buy weapons from the us. because victoria, during the total known and told us that at the end of the day, the bulk of money that you're a n d us already to give $2.00 grand would go back to the us. so what he's saying 1st the all new ammunition to gifts to do great. and so how he's going to go and

fight in ukraine. secondly, he called quite the war that these already lost. so the, there is no agreement among the european leaders. and they're all matters, i station in the street to fewer by the agriculture, by all the other people who are extremely unhappy because of the late inflation due to the read your decision says, february 2022. when we have sharp, i was sent in the foot and decided to go and buy the washing eh, owing from india and to buy the american n o region, guys that goes full time, more expensive than the restroom gas. there are no devil a the french defense minister commented on my crohn's statement, same quote, to say that we exclude and nothing is neither weak nor escalade towards what do you think about the position? was he basically shrugging off what my chrome said?

sure, obviously uh i think maxwell actually broke ranks. uh, the idea is not to come out obviously. all right, then said will well send troops there. but the facts are very stubborn, which is that we have uh, germany easily falls under u. k. signed my law told agreements with ukraine. what do those uh, by that's all agreements and tell in practice only time will tell. and obviously right now was the federal traveler in washington dc fighting for his political life? everything is done. so watch to not try to create panic amongst the population, but make no mistake about it. the spot that you'd be fit for nato is in the offing . and all those uh, uh, agents placed in those people's emotions in western countries are playing their role. and soon or later,

we'll try to engage the collective west into an open conference. definitely was russia. so, i mean, what are your thoughts on that? there are media reports that other european governments have been studying. parents has planned to send troops to crane for several weeks and that the united states supports the idea if that's true. are we looking at the birch here of another world war? yeah. so i mean, those said was, she'll even think about this idea of what, but i'm actually looking at the moment. it is just, i'm going to say that idea from an unpopular verse. i like to put these all nations and put the rest of the your in on the board of the, i mean, friday we already and when do most conditions. i've said i've been talking to send me the 2. and the other thing is the be, here's stupidity by metal, i'm going to continue on with the last few months. vmc.

on the other hand, you have seen the, i do like to meet a lot of the, you know, a dash on. yep. i mean, you know, these and he said the engage any further explanation. we just, i mean, i mean there should be no escalation on the other hand, um, so just do standard by mac. that means that the need for the so your, you know, the danger at all, not one more, 3, and what would be affecting the euro from getting the movie that back to the americans? why is a, be, i mean, what is the america use the euro and the proxy is less, yeah, this is a clear understand that. and then the, you people are being used by the, your end no matter what,

and that's what i mean. and then what i mean, anybody will be back here to there on the if the think that i mean it will be today, i don't think so that if it doesn't make any effect or any any t investment black, what he has doing on and if it was d n a any, you know, cause it could be a model, it could be very much catastrophic. and because use of in this entire scenario, maybe your, we so busy problems yourself. and indeed, i think nobody knows in but something back that i. yeah. and i think i understand that it is actually not in the view, but it is an american cost race. these they should not come into a trap who's ever seen you. it is being used by the mountains. eliza, back to europe and leaders were quick to reject to the idea of sending their people

to fight and ukraine. what does that say to you about agreement with in the european union regarding the complex there is no agreement among the european union . we've seen the other day when a europe decided to send $54000000000.00 to your grand or so on the land the you're in commission the said with or without the in the number of the european union. and we would give the money to credit and which means that they already divided the constitution just to accommodate all american ford size and the american foreign policy. but i understand where and my, the way my phone is coming from. he was arguing that in 10 years down the line, we wouldn't have in europe, russia on our doors. it's because he fully understand that the war and ukraine is

going nowhere. it's the last of all, and rochester said that it will not stop until the d. knox duplication of ukraine. if your credit doesn't sit around the table, then not only 30 percent of your grade is all but all of the ukraine, and that is a failure for all of the 50 nation that all gathering or, and run staying in germany to that and supply weapons and intelligence and to conduct the war on russia from germany. so if this war is lost, the whole of europe is going to, for, from the military approach. and this is why a menu in mclean saying, we need to go and fight as you're being in other people's land in ukraine, destroying more ukraine, getting more europeans instead of seeing russia inside our country. when there are no elements that indicate that russia wants to expand beyond view grain,

the objective of russia is very clear to all of the european de does. however, as one to go get said, right the, we have become a proxy to the us a, our know we're seeing how european leaders are distancing themselves from the kron and it was back in october that we saw a similar situation when the french president proposed creating an international coalition to fight a mazda and nobody actually supported it. why do you think mr. microns suggestions are not finding support among his western counterparts, despite friends being a he, you and natal member state as well obviously because uh they are not the same um, brand of agent. as my goal is, my goal is someone was somewhat completely illegitimate and falls as one of your guest dimensions. you specing a lot of internal um what position and he needs an out and so to him,

falls does not exist as an entity. my call is vying for the post of uh, president of the european union. that's really what it's all about for my phone. and so in that sense, this man is very dangerous because he doesn't really care about differential interest versus a falls to him is ideologically, almost if you directly something that he rejects uh, completely, uh, e as being programmed to take over, you know, the european position, create this you've been superstate, the idea that you've created this uh, completed this deal with as an ascii. and now under domestic pressure announced that he was going to go to the national assembly to flight yourself. you're going to basically try to control the opposition. and randy, uh, the one who are refusing to go with the program as for russian agents, but you will get to eventually the, the able to actively the my, that's all like we met was ukraine. agreed upon, money dated. and the problem,

what i'm afraid of is that a to the next, that, as you says, you know, we don't, we may not have to send french group to fight russia. but more was that you money day. and we've seen that before again, recently with, you know, a friendship nationals being casualties in ukraine. so we know that french shorter was operating down to a dubious covers and so on it. or the idea would be that we, if we have to sacrifice french troops, what technically or officially presented as not belligerent. but i'll know the last french troops, you know, official wants to. and the victim of the false flag disk would then be the guest, his belly, that gets all the members of the alliance involved into quite a treat wire. i mean, in germany like france is one of the main supporters of the crime, but it has rejected putting boots on the ground. is there a risk that you think in decision making between 2 countries within the u. a good

thing that, i mean we have seen, i mean last winter as well. and then they were talking about, you know, a few items of my guess of my and that i'm getting the stuff. i'm very clear that they will not matter. i mean, this is, this is more, you're using your service. i mean, a journey guys deal that we're making all these trying to do a, some of some of the really wants to be more of a 100 or something, but it does not lead to be bad. teacher for the your are for the generally or for any country, it will become more catastrophic if we become more, you know, i will see a doctor, you know what, i mean, you know, i'm them. so i think you have see a lot of the retreat are, you know, media all the, all that it is the point of the, you know, between me and joe need as being and brought to me i, you know,

differentiate already in your uh, you know, country so, i mean, this issue has definitely, i mean only your income has been on the can not. so what we call the american dis, thought because of anything with the feeling america always be the you know, if anybody is trying in your, on behalf of american address, i'm an incidence of a leadership is not technology that has a new one. any sensitive, agreed receive, and then the joe mean that it isn't spent on that is the main why we, that's of the arts in countries have, let's say we have see, united kingdom has been following so many step of it. and it is very much again, you know, was in uh, you know, by this time we're very who are, she's a great again. so i, so i mean all the, you gave me the supporting the said yes. that, that is the main thing. i mean,

we have to understand that sometimes, you know, the sea has like connected wireless trying to take it. it could be, you know, just to come into the news and just to be more closer to a mac address. but it's not in the interest at all. okay. we're going to leave it there. political analyst and veteran war zone correspond to elijah magneer for the whole consultants and human rights defend. there are no delay. and journalist and strategic affairs expert heavy to con, almost freaky. thank you gentlemen. for joining us. the rest of the streams are strengthening battlefield positions on the donuts friends and after the successful capture of the city, they have liberated 3 more residential areas in one week. total personnel losses on the cranium side have far exceeded 400000. that's according to the russian defense minister. she was already in, during the russian special military operation. the ukrainian armed forces have lost a total of more than $444000.00 service members. after the failure of their

counter offensive, the ukrainian military command is trying to stabilize the situation and prevent of the collapse of the front at the expense of its remaining reserves. well, the russian defense minister was talking about the recent games made by russian troops down. and i've d. s got in particular and he said in general, russian troops have been getting more control of the don't ex region. he talks about the size, the controlled and said since the beginning of 20 towards full. so just this year, the russian troops have been able to take an extra 327 square kilometers of territory. just to put you in to context. what that means that is larger than the size of an e, you state that is the space to malta. he also talks about, of ukrainian dead saying that soldiers, they were laughing at losing more than $800.00 individuals on a daily basis on average. and therefore, as you heard and not click,

russia was estimating the total loss of ukrainian sold, as is some 444000 individuals since the source of the conflict back in february 2022. that is very different to what we heard from ukraine this week. president uh, zalinski saying that the law says was 31000 individuals. i'm but it's not as much of that saying that there's a huge disparity here is actually the figures are a lot higher. we heard from the washington post back in 2023 saying it had sources within the us government that was already pushing the losses of recording and soldiers as around a 170000. so you can see that there was a huge difference to what you claim is pushing out it towards po, please, the reality on the ground. what we also heard that this was the 1st time the russian troops i'm unable to take out the american operations tongue. now adds to long list of military equipment,

the russian soldiers have been able to obliterate on the front lines. he also talked about the issues in the south pacific saying that need to have increased its exercises in the region and also its presence in the region that said the as a result rusher is having to do what it needs to do to protect it. see, eastern board is pushing for the for those. the washington continues to use the rising tensions on the korean peninsula and in the area of tie one island as a pretext to expand the presence of its military forces in the western pacific ocean. because this year, the scope of joint exercises between the united states and this allies is expected to increase due to the military potential of nato member countries or persons to as well as a result of that there will be increased equipment put down into the eastern old so they will be more training of preservice in the east and less. you'll also be

carrying out international missions with several countries, including a loud vietnam and india the escalating situation in the middle east and let the discussion between the russian foreign minister and the many prime minister in moscow on tuesday. so gale, rob express conviction that the you many who the showing of commercial vessels of the red sea was largely a consequence of these rarely palestinian conflict written, you know, we do not condone to showing the merchant ships, but we also cannot justify the aggressive actions that the united states and the u . k. are taken against that service or of the republic of human under bet, protects, without any international mandate in the form of the un security council resolution . the did not allow it to report minutes as i grade level over the course of the last 3 months, has issued statements highlight of his position, but more problem with highlighting bosco's position on this matter. a letter

stating that the united states, along with the united kingdom are currently defiant international law, as opposed to an extensive business growing up in a new point of moscow that the united states have be nice to have some means to justify intervention. so that intervention cannot be military intervention more so it can include the bombing of the stage or the southern states as well as the people, particularly young man that has been in the comes from a contract for the better part of the decade. which really highlight some of the kinetic german crises over that period as well for ministers, that grade level and that the money problem is on the but it kind of discussed a number of possible outcomes. and i didn't get many satisfied grades whatnot. for this law, this is what page uh, you know, many tried me to say i have to say for them. and i thought for us, we support the palestinian people. they have the right to have their own independence stage with the capital in east jerusalem. and we will work in this direction to mitigate the consequences of the humanitarian disaster that we are now

witnessing happening. that there are a double standards applied to this situation. then we in the m and taking a class stance in regard to the palestinian issue. and we shared the russian approach to that issue from this is best document that hasn't been issued over the course of not just the last 2 months, but over the past 2 years or even longer, back to the united states or the connected west hasn't been involved in some sort of double standard, we're double sandra suggests that took, leaving by standing at any given time is by without the theme do force of international law or the new i security council carry out strikes, leaving the wage war against the states. but more formulas. the russian position on the model is involved as a samsung washer is currently acting as a mediator despite the impressions of the united states and we cannot contain them trying to ensure that this also does not spill over to send out your students are getting the form minister, when you look it up the pretty to finish that if we have a warrant that contain it, violence in and around together. street will create additional political and mailed

to risk in the region. but instead of making a collective effort to de escalate the us, somebody u k. have chosen a forceful response. so here level is less than one, issued a statement suggesting that the united states or the collective, less physical interested when they go shooting. and that statement, who said that, according to these dynamics and the names of these dynamics side of the general sense of the west, i shouldn't be strictly negative. and what is getting worse or truly suggest, i mean less than how interested in negotiating. and that based potentially slight role often, you know what works before it was sent over to the 2nd congress of the international risk, the filed movement and a form on global multiple. larry is underway in moscow representatives from over $130.00 countries are taking part. we've heard from political analyst pep escobar, who says the amount of foreign delegates testifies to rushes, prominence in global affairs, and the importance of a more multi polar world. i cannot over states enough how important this

is. we have representatives of over 130 nation states here, apart from moving south and 0. yesterday i had the honor to bother rates, especially on the global cells, which i, i wish you could have gone on for the whole day. but i had that 33 and a half hours and we have representation of as yeah, after we got in latin america speaking with their own voices. and it was something absolutely extraordinary. refresh sir, is extremely isolated as we've been seeing here. and as we see behind those, right, it's very, very, very difficult to explain this to the west. i am a product of the west of myself. so i know how all of us who understand the russian position and the russian civilizational position,

the way we are politically marginalized, by the so called owners of the narrative, not anymore, because the people who owned the narrative now they are right here. all right, do stay with us here on our to international up next, the documentary hero wines by where you have a shift letter specialist. if somebody look chairs with the table and i see previous looked like some numbers that long ago, but just the color of the one. yes. oh, that's across the seems to me, i started my job to get the benefits on the get the or the, the problem for the delay. no netscape like the long or something marshal . they said it's.