the the nato allies distance themselves from the idea of sending troops to pm. as the french president says, he cannot roll out european boots on your printing and soil. moscow says mac cron doesn't realize the significance of what he's saying. the russian defense minister says russian troop 7 liberated 3 residential areas on the domestic front in one week. adding a refrain in turn is using us remaining reserves for event collapse plus incentive for making a collective effort to de escalate us. some of you could have chosen a forceful response, rushes for administer warrens that continued violence in and around the gaza will create additional political and military risk in the region. it said that during a meeting with the many prime minister in moscow,

the, i'm rachel ruble live in moscow. you're watching r t international natal chief in stilton. virg says the alliance is not considering sending troops to crime that comes in mid reaction from russia to french husbands, emanuel microns suggestion. there could be direct involvement in the hot conflict. moscow says such a move could lead it to no good results. we are well aware of mac cross position on the needs to inflict the strategic defeat on russia and so on. we have noticed the fact that the topic of sending troops to the crane was indeed discussed. we have also taken note that there was a very rich pallet of opinions on this matter. indeed, there was no consensus. okay, but the number of countries participating in the parents event remain sober in

their assessment of the potential risks of subtractions and the potential risk of being directly involved in a hot conflict. well, out of all the leaders of all the nato member states macro on the is the only one who's suggested this plan, this idea that sending nato troops to crane to fight, there is not off the table to take people gifts as well. everything was this cause this evening in a very open and direct manner. there is no consensus to day to officially openly and with endorsements and troops on the ground. but in terms of dynamics, nothing should be ruled out. we will do everything necessary to ensure that russia can not win this war book with us as foreign ministers. certainly alive, rob. explain the reasoning behind the shocking proposal as a means for the west to try and compensate for the lack of results that the ukrainians are seeing on the battlefield right now. but at any rate, a proposal like this is enough to set off alarm bells, but coming from the head of a major western state, it set the main stream media into a frenzy with headlines,

talking about potential world war 3 erupt. and what about other european leaders? what are they being say? well many of them are not happy about the tone of monday's meeting. we for example, heard from slovakia as prime minister who said that piece was not even mentioned there are just didn't put it was completely bull like meaning to support the war at all costs and to do everything you know, is it for the want to continue? i was very surprised that there was not a single was about any piece plan or piece that they should to. i can confirm that the all countries that are all ready to send their own soldiers to ukraine all the say never so long case among them. they are also countries that say that this proposal should be considered all government. this piece oriented rejects, the continuation of the war, will not send weapons to ukraine and will focus on severely on projects of yep. will settle in that same realm of thought. we heard from hungry is for administer. who said that there

a flat outside that his country is not going to be under any circumstances sending troops to ukraine. this anti war or a message from slovakia and hungry comes as no surprise. what are we hearing from the other european countries in support of ukraine? well, even the more pro, key of figures, like germany's chancellor, the leadership of the european commission and even the secretary general of nato himself. they're all saying that they're not going to be sending troops to ukraine and many other nato states. sort of that, the very least saying that the, the block is divided on this outline, this idea really, let's take a listen. what they said. there was a heated discussion about sending soldiers to you frame, and there was no absolute mutual understanding on this issue. there are different opinions, but i want to emphasize that there are absolutely no such decisions. right now, we are busy sending advanced systems from sweden to ukraine in various ways. as many other countries are doing, it's a completely different matter. there is also no such demand on the part of ukraine

. this issue is irrelevant. i want to assure you that there's no question of sending european nato forces inside ukraine. an issue that for greece does not exist and i believe doesn't exist for the great majority of our colleagues. and let's shift to the average citizen here. don't old. what has the reaction being from the french public to them across things? but because, you know, sometimes it's usually a disconnect between the leadership what the leadership of a country wants and what the people want. what have you seen? well, it seems that people are just as afraid as the kind of fear we've been seeing. and these mainstream media headlines, a lot of stuff has been echoing between those headlines and what people are saying specifically talking about the fears of world war 3, sending french ground troops to ukraine, cronies. crazy, completely crazy. it would obviously be war with russia. world war 3, sending troops to ukraine would make us belligerence. war against russia would be madness. this belligerent verbal escalation by a nuclear power against another major nuclear power is already an air responsible

act. manual the chrome explain vote, but it's our children's lives. he's talking about so carelessly. it's a question of peace over no country. now in terms of the actual idea of sending troops to ukraine, although there might not be consensus among european leaders. there certainly is a consensus among the general population across the west, but that consensus is absolutely against sending troops to ukraine. we've got statistics from polls here, sending us troops to ukraine, and people who strongly support that that's the only 6 percent of the population. well, strongly opposes 41 percent in terms of europe sending uh, troops to ukraine. support for that in germany is 13 percent. i mean the highest we have here is in sweden 33 percent, which is still extremely low. when you take the population as a whole, so there's no doubt that there's very little supports in the west or among the general population for starting

a potential world war 3. moscow says statements like this from the french president ways. questions about his adequacy as a leader and comments to r. t vs foreign ministry spokeswoman said paris, you should remember its own historical opposition to nazi as a beautiful white and what's 1st. just weeks ago, french president, my crown and his representatives, denied parents having any official role in recruiting volunteers or mercenaries, quite a few of whom were on ukrainian territory. and despite the facts presented by the russian side, in particular by our investor in paris, the palace denied it in every possible way. then the french president says he is considering sending his military to ukraine is one of the options. the question arises as to the adequacy of people who make such statements. but it seems to me that the problem is much deeper than that. it is that people who are running things in the e. u in france now do not know. and in the context of parents do not appreciate

their history. i want to remind mr. mack chrome that there are other pages in francis history that would be worth paris turning to now and realizing in the 21st century. for example, the emergence and growth of anti fascist organizations, an enter french resistance to naziism during the 2nd world war and the joining the citizens and all of civil society and friends in the fight against naziism, against the 3rd reich. when it was not an official trans in france, this is what needs to be done now, to counteract the rise of naziism in ukraine. and we understand very well that enough facts have been provided to make even those who didn't want to believe it. to now believe it, so who side is background on? what is this is ridiculous to attempt that hype to make a spectacular statement to gather more hits, or is it just disrespect for his own heroes? the heroes of france, who gave their lives in the fight against nazi as i'm yeah, let's put an end chief editor of finish. and the, let's see, says the narrative is

a sign of an escalating war of words, which is the west reaction to russia's success on the battlefield. where do i see that the war of the woods is escalating as fast as the russian troops are liberating? the dumas region, the panic is growing amongst the western supporters. they see that the great in front lines are collapsing and at bands is very powerful. i see that the seas and has to be the bluff. beats orchestrated very much from the frame size. we have seen the whole day, so one leader of to run out or convincing their own population that no, no, no, we are not sending our voice there. and of course that would be a madness. that would be a k is. so they are panicking out from their own actions. what us being disgusting of being friends is basically another question, but looks like that the marker on has to take his own off the steps,

trying to make the discussion maybe distort the attention alt, from the real games, what the russian troops are doing and to create the west east panicking as they cannot do anything to prevent russia will need superior already in the battlefield . they are trying to escalate to world war on the works. well, as the mac kron makes controversial statements about ukraine, his government has been losing influence in other parts of the world as well. fema francis or minister has been trying to mend relations with rocco, expressing support for the north african nations autonomy plan for western sahara. that's coming up later in the program, the russian troops are strengthening and battlefield positions on the domestic front and the after the successful capture of, of the, of can city. they have liberated the 3 more residential areas in one week. total personal loss is on the premium side have far exceeded 400000 according to the

russian defense minister, she was over there this besides, during the russian special military operation, the ukrainian armed forces have lost a total of more than $444000.00 service amendment after the failure of their counter offensive, the ukrainian military command is trying to stabilize the situation and prevent of the collapse of the front at the expense of its remaining reserves. well, the russian defense minister was talking about the recent games made by russian troops down in ab df got in particular. and he said, in general, russian troops had been gaining more control of the don't ex region. he talks about the size of the controller and said since the beginning of 2024. so just this year, the russian troops have been able to take an extra 327 square kilometers of territory. just to put you in to context what that means, that is larger than the size of an e. you state that is the space to malta. he also talked about of ukrainian dead

saying that soldiers, they were laughing at losing moving $800.00 individuals on a daily basis on average. and therefore, as you heard and not quite, russia was estimating the total loss of ukrainian sold. this is some 444000 individuals since the source of the conflict back in february 2022. that is very different to what we heard from ukraine this week. president uh, zalinski saying that the law says was 31000 individuals. i'm but it's not just the washer that saying that there's a huge disparity here is actually the figures are a lot higher. we heard from the washington post back in 2023 saying it had sources within the us government that was already pushing the losses of recording and soldiers as around a 170000. so you can see that there was a huge difference to what you queen is putting out. it's a watch app, hopefully is

a reality on the ground. what we also heard that this was the 1st time the russian seem to be able to take out the american outcomes. told that now it's too long list of military equipment. the russian soldiers have been able to obliterate on the front lines. he also talks to file the issues in the south pacific saying that need to have increased its exercises in the region and also its presence in the region that said the as a result rusher is having to do what it needs to do to protect it. see, eastern board is especially for, for those the washington continues to use the rising tensions on the korean peninsula and in the area of taiwan island as a pretext to expand the presence of its military forces in the western pacific ocean. this year, the scope of joint exercises between the united states and this allies is expected

to increase due to the military potential of nato member countries or persons to as well as a result of that there will be increased equipment put down into the eastern on. so they will be more training of preservice in the east and rush will also be carrying out international missions with several countries, including a loud vietnam and india. the escalating situation in the middle east. the discussion between the russian foreign minister and the many prime minister in moscow on tuesday. sorry, i love rob express to conviction that the many who the selling of commercial vessels in the red sea was largely a consequence of these rallied palestinian conflict. written, you know, what i'll do is we do not condone to showing the merchant ships, but we also cannot justify the aggressive actions that the united states and the u . k. are taken against that service or of the republic a pm. and under that pretext, without any international mandate in the form of

a un security council resolution that did not allow it to be formed, mid assessed. i grade level over the course of the last 3 months, has issues maintenance highlight of his position, but more problems with highlighting bosco's position on this matter that instead of the united states, along with the united kingdom are currently defiant, international law approach to an extensive right versus really nothing. i'm the point of moscow that the united states and being nice to have some means to justify intervention, that that intervention cannot be military intervention more so it cannot include the bombing of the stage or the southern states as well as the people, particularly the man that has been in the comes from a conflict for the better part of executive origin. really highlight some of the kinetic german crises over that period as well. for ministers that grade level and that the money problem is the kind of discuss the number of possible outcomes. and i didn't get many satisfied grades like no for this law. this is what page. uh,

you know, many tried me to so have to pull them in. i thought for us, we support the palestinian people. they have the right to have their own independence stage with the capital in east jerusalem, and we will work in this direction to mitigate the consequences of the humanitarian disaster that we're now witnessing happening that there a double standards applied to this situation. then we in the m and taking a class stance in regard to the palestinian issue and we shared the russian approach to that issue for this. this has been a supplement that hasn't been issued over the course of not just the last 2 months, but over the past 2 years or even longer, back to the united states or the collected, wes hasn't been involved in some sort of double standard where a double standard suggests that i took the nightstand at any given time as by without the theme do force of international law or to your why security council carry out strikes or even wage war against the states. but more formulas, the russian position on the matter resolved as a samsung washer is currently as big as

a mediator. despite the impressions from the united states army united kingdom, trying to ensure that this conflict does not spill over the years to so game of the foreign minister. we have the ability to finish this. we have only warrant that continued violence, e and around the gallows trip will create additional political and military risk in the region. but instead of making a collective effort to de escalate the us, somebody u k. have chosen a forceful response. so here, level of less than one, issued a statement suggesting that the united states or the collective, less physical interested when they go shooting. and that statement, he said that according to these dynamics and the development in somebody's dynamics . so it'd be the general sense of the west has been extremely negative and is getting way so truly suggest die. so the less than i'm interested in the go shading on this because potentially slow to roll out to me. you know what works before it. let's say competitive france appears to be seeking to make political inroads with morocco after years of winning influence on the african continent. parents says and

will try to move forward with the north african nations planned to give a ton of me to the disputed region of western sahara. he says he liked his soldier . so these are a question, is an existential issue for morocco or the and autonomy plan was presented by morocco and has been on the table since 2007. it is now time to move forward. and i will see to which, personally, so they send that along to you. he's, you know, a western sahara has been under dispute for decades after spanish forces withdrew from the region and nearby morocco claims sovereignty fighting abrupt it. and the un had to step in with peace making efforts, the complex it broke out again 4 years ago. and morocco deployed his military to stop a protest that led to western sahara as military and all like the ceasefire deal. brock, those claims of the region were rejected by the un france previously expressed neutrality about the issue then paris has relations with

a northwestern african nation, grew increasingly strained in 2021 frantic hughes morocco of committing espionage against the president. my crohn morocco denied those claims. the tensions continued to increase and 2 years later, morocco rejected frances offer to provide aid to the african nations following a deadly earthquake in france has been losing substantial influence on the african continent in the past few years of shoes and several countries are there, and governments that had been amenable to paris and a friendship sentiments had been on the rise as african nations and couldn't molly new sharon burkina faso have rejected historical ties with the former colonial ruler and heard from a senior diplomat from western sahara and the line in that last hall, he says, france, like most other western powers, does not see africa as worthy of an equal partnership. the french position is not one who's been fighting with the organization commercialization

for our suspension 75 years, unfortunately. but this is the 2 friends as best as the issues with the off the conditions or too much to so how it tells prim who's side to read the station, a glass, it's a national vote and it goes to the right division so that she didn't seem new right added for really uh, says about the declination of such a position where i'm a country that's a surprise to be a member of a security concept. and most of the members and part of the solution notion of these sorts of imports on see much of the nation instead of incredibly young men of courtney, continuing to uh like cuz that's that goes into it. so there is an ocean in to discover what to do about this defense and cooling matters. and again, you can let me and is that some of these other people should be sort of depression . that's one that i have my ration to patching the flush cache and it goes to

humanity. you must actually can. i have never of just met a treat to assume that the given after tuesday to mess up with that is the, the, the potential to, uh, you know, to, to us and it adds to the, to the development talk to you. it'll be as of the rest of the rent because we haven't met because we have resources, we have the young nation, we have a much better attention to me. i'm just, i'm now i just have to leave the rest and that was the best of them. or if i see them actually, you can actually come as much as even much opportunity to, to really contribute to 2 different types of the, of a few, many to young. i'm sorry,

i missed this call was have twice servers and attempt to know the new generation really to find that hold on the garbage and you call them yes. and it's about c s, i'm a, it's a graph. pulses, wrist, tenants, risk them, farms still didn't get too often except must be subsidy period. we have just not to 6 investments or is that your spectrum to us? you can decisions. and due to this situation between us, because the risk is go in griffin, worse well, the 2nd congress of the international risk, the file movement at a forum on global multi polarity have kicked off in moscow. representatives from over $130.00 countries are taking part. we've heard from an indonesian delegate who said his country and russia have mutual ideas about diversity and multi polarity in the world. we have also started that social networks must allow all voices to be

heard. i have the same idea as the guns my guns most. so is really got the, well, we've got day for us to be in one sort of diversity. the multiple, a lot of it is in the in line with what we have in my account. that is all. i think it's interesting and want to see another perspective of the same ideas of i fully agree and support the support of multiple out of these because it is human of the from in 33 we are different and we have to find a way to compromise which is the problem that something like we cannot express fully. i wanna move the because the

new public space. so, so maybe i only have one method. we have one, we have one well out of the which is popularity and that's it. and that's, that's make many foreigners on her. we need as many as why just to be that. so we know as a human being, we got a letter from each other. and that's the idea. in my opinion, i do stay with our to international up next on the 360 view, illegal immigration in america, and the group that spreading awareness and peacefully protesting the open border policies. president biden stands behind by the

the, it was supposed to be a call to action for thousands of americans. frustrated with the lack of immigration security at the southern border. turned out to be a raleigh of just a few 100 over 3 states on sky. now hughes, in on this edition of $360.00 view,

we're going to discuss whether the maxim move it still possesses the power to motivate unimportant issues, including showing up at the polls in november. so let's get started. the in january, the supreme court ruled the federal government not texas had authority over the border and border control could start cutting down the razor wire, erected by texas governor greg abbott, all to help secure the border. and response a take back our border. trucker conroy, a group of christian truckers held events across the texas, arizona in california, which included concerts and speakers. now the 8 was to help spread awareness and peacefully protest. president jo biden's position on the border and the open border

policies. he stands behind notables like former vice presidential candidate, and governor of alaska. sarah palin, as well as feigned the rocker ted nugent took the stage. the organizes of the protests were aiming for $700000.00 plus to attend. however, actual numbers felt very short, was only several hundreds showing up. now almost all the latest polls show the subject of border security and immigration rigging, as number 2 or number 3 and voters might hit by the showing of this last rally against the lack of security at the southern border. you would think the only action voters are looking to take on the issue is going to be on election day. but it's ridiculous to say a politician is going to take care of a problem, especially if it's one that they have done everything possible to avoid fixing in the past as somebody or and say, encourage this problem to grow. well,

let's discuss this with our panel joined me today, our former democratic congressman from florida, alan grayson, whose personality is just as bright as that shirt and from new york. we have typical analyst, steve malls, berg and director of policy studies at the center for immigration studies. jesse von, thank you so much for joining me. let's make sure we have a lively conversation on this because i do believe it is an important issue. and i will start with you just because i remember the anti obamacare rallies that happened in 2009 in do you see there were thousands of people that all really lead to the birth of the tea party? there was enough momentum in the anti government controlled health care to flip congress in 2010. so let's move it to today. do you think americans really care about what is going on at the border? and enough that it could actually have an effect on the outcome of an election for the most definitely do care. and i think it really could affect the outcome of this coming election because there are such stark differences among the candidates on

their immigration positions, at least between the democrats and the republicans. under the last 3 years of the, by the administration, we've seen the, the worst crisis along the border in our history with higher levels of illegal immigration that we've ever seen. and a lot of public safety and fiscal and security problems as a result. um, even if maybe not everybody loves donald trump, but they do love is immigration policy. and i would trust donald trump more to um to bring order to our border and to get this crisis fixed. so, you know, so i'm sure there will be other issues at play, but the immigration issue apparently is the one that people care most about right now, regardless of their political affiliation. is that how you see it outlined in the fact that this is an issue that's bi partisan? i know they're trying to make a deal in washington dc for element seems like the 2nd decade in a row. do you think this is

a that is just clear cut between democrats and republicans? you know, this is a republicans trying to make an issue because they feel like making an issue. a joe biden arrested more people to border in one year than donald trump didn't for years, and 8 out in w8w out of the 12000000 mexicans who across the border across the board during the george w bush administration, was this is republicans desperately tries to take attention away from the fact that they're likely candidate has been invited for times is having his business strict away from him because of fraud and so on and so forth. he's literally the worst person in america, and they're the ones he's, he's the one that they're putting up to be present, united states. they're just trying to distract us. okay. says hey, do you agree that they're just trying to distract from their kid up and using immigration? is the issue. yeah, right. well then that then it's the most it's.