having won independence, american colonists headed for the total extermination of the indigenous population of the continent. american indians were deprived of their land. local residents were driven into reservations and given the worst agricultural territories. while the best land was appropriated by white colonizers, the strongest blow to american indian tribes was the extermination of by some native americans lived by hunting these wild animals. colonists slaughtered the bison, and in fact, made them nearly extinct. every buffalo did, he's in india and gone, said colonel richard dogs, a veteran of the bloody and vicious indian wars cynically. the indigenous population was simply exterminated us army generals philip sheridan express the evidence of this policy in the infamous words. the only good india is a dead indian, the genocide of native americans of north america lead to a demographic catastrophe. the exact number of deaths is still unknown,

but the number of victims is in millions. having been a majority on the continent before being digit, as people make up less than 3 percent of the us population today. the bad. hi everybody. i'm are sanchez and i'm here to tell you that after being a journalist and a news presenter for, for the biggest networks in the united states, it's time for some context and for some truth, tell him. and then that vein, here's what we're going to be talking about. number one, why are soldiers not patrolling new york subways? and what does that say? number 2, china tells us tech companies that out. is it getting mad or is it getting even number 3? why is alana zillow and scott, the 1st lady of ukraine in case you didn't know snubbing 1st lady jo biden's

invitation to sit with her at the state of the union address to me. but here's the most interesting story. it has to do with a woman named victoria of newland, the queen of the neo cons. she's stepping down. who is she? why she's so wealthy. and what's this going to mean for ukraine? good questions. you bet. this is a direct impact the so if a picture is worth a 1000 words, then this one should be like an entire book, a book perhaps about the future of our country, the future of america. look at this. and as you're looking at this picture, those members, they're of the national guard, their soldiers, right? essentially inside some of the same ones you've served in iraq and afghanistan.

those guys, those dials are now patrolling the subways of new york city. the optics of this, just think about it for a minute. the optics of this seem bizarre to me anyway, because one of the things that i always kind of separated in my mind, maybe because i'm a gringo here and that's the way i think. the way i separated us from the rest of the countries in the world that i've visited, for example, throughout latin america, is that we don't seem to have a military presence in our daily lives here in the united states. we don't, right? or at least that's what i always thought. i mean, and here's what i mean. i've never been, for example, have you ever been on vacation to like the caribbean or the line america? i always found that when i went there, i thought it was always on settling when i went there on trips with my wife and with my kids to see these guys in these military fatigues holding a machine gun, you know, and they were like next to me and my wife and my kids while we were sitting on the beach or outside of store or even at

a park. and it always made me made us question. is there something going on here about was this guy sitting here with the machine gun, right? how safe can this place be where we're vacationing? if there's a guy next to us with the machine gun in the military for tags. how free is this place? i asked. well, a, i'm what i'm wondering now should we be asking the same question about us here in the united states as we learned that a 1000 guards are being sent to patrol the subways 250 of them going to be straight troopers. another $750.00 of them are going to be national guardsmen sitting there . the subway is as you come in and out and go to work why new york officials are saying that it's a, it's for the turns to send a message to the potential bad guys. right? the real reason, the some ways are just damn dangerous these days. they've already been 3 killings this year alone. commuters are being attacked and recently, even

a trained conductor had a slight slashed, you know, how many people use in new york subways? by the way, 3000000 people in the bay. the united states has reportedly adding thousands of chinese companies to a trade blacklist later today in total, around each additional companies could be added to the so called entity list. nearly all of them chinese did you hear that? yeah, the all of them chinese, so that has been pretty much the big story here in the united states for the past 8 years or so. we heard it during the trump administration. we're hearing and now during the, by the ministration of the same is pretty simple. go after and punish all chinese tech companies. what's interesting about this story is i've told it over the years and written about it over the years. us tech companies, our guys here have long been warning us that these china sanctions, these things that we're doing, the chinese would end up hurting us or hurting them. in other words,

right. the tech companies in the us. well guess what? as it's happened, del, international business machines, cisco systems, they're all getting kicked out of china as beijing games to let its own companies take over all tech operations by 2027. so why are the chinese doing this? well, according to them, they apparently don't trust us. american tech giants had long drive them china, as we provided them with tech tools. they provided us with cheap labor. and now china reacting no doubt to the match the back and forth with washington over the last 7 or 8 years. savage, driven to self sufficiency within the computer industry. it's operating systems and software systems because it doesn't trust the us tech companies any more. can you say take the time? usually the wise of presidents are exclusively engaged in peaceful affairs,

education, human rights, equality, accessibility, and maybe you expected from me to speak on those topics. but how can i talk about them when and on per loca? and pro invasive terrorist war is being waged against, and my country of russia is destroying, are with people that in case you couldn't figure it out for the records, is the 1st lady of ukraine speaking recently. and then at the invitation of nancy pelosi to the us congress or a congressional hearing or meeting. she was also invited to attend the state of the union by 1st lady joe biden, and they were going to be sitting together for all the world to see. but apparently mississauga lensky had said that as see ain't doing it. she snubbing the us 1st lady snubbing the event. you wonder why here's a story kind of gets weird. i mean, it reminds me of high school,

pardon me for saying that. so she's not being the invitation because she doesn't like the widow of to 10 critic alexi know volney. you can't make this stuff up right. but here it is. according to the officially now mrs. sullen. scott? yes, that's how you pronounce her name. it's not zalinski cuz she's the wife, female, whatever. anyway, they say that when she heard that mrs. not volley pronounced noble maya was also invited. she said, well, that i'm not going, i'm not going if she's going. and apparently she's not going for a reason. look, and it's kind of complicated, but apparently it has to do with crimea with despair you a headache, i'll save you the explanation for some other time and perhaps some other show. then there's missus newland thinks he can wait ukraine out and he thinks he can wait out all of us. we need to prove him wrong. that was under secretary of

state victoria newland last month discussing tactics to stop russian president. what am i putting on the 2nd anniversary of the ukraine war? now, just week later, the career diplomat to turn top political appointee is retiring. here you go, secretary of state. anthony blinked and has announced that his under secretary, victoria newland, i guess is number 2 or number 3 or whatever is stepping down. maryland is an interventionist. you know, that means other words, she likes wars and she like sending our troops to go fight in worse. she's also large in very large measure, responsible for the escalation of the war in ukraine. in fact, outside of us media, she's known worldwide, right? you won't hear about it here because our media doesn't report this for some reason because i don't know. they just don't want you to know the truth, but she's known throughout the world and media reports around the world have shown

this. she was the person who directed the c. i a to start the cool when you grained, to push out the democratically elected president, back in 2014. did you know that you probably did? if you're watching me from somewhere else outside of washington, why didn't she want him out? by the way, why did you want that do the president at the time out because. busy his ties to russia is the, the jury, and who and hates russia. hey, it's russia. i mean, with them and vigorous she h. russia. here's a smoking gun. now that proves that she did exactly what her critics charged. that she was overheard by the way, in the planning of disco, of the dates in precise context of the recording and not known you'd under the us ambassador to ukraine. geoffrey piet's discuss which of the countries opposition leaders they'd like to see in government, and they refer to getting the un involved. so that would be great, i think, to help glue this thing and have the un help fluid. and you know, the, you know, exactly, and i think we've got to do something to make it stick together because you can be

pretty sure that if it does, if it does start to gain altitude, the russians will be working behind the scenes to try to torpedo it so there it is . now here's what you need to know. i. i started this morning and last night doing a little bit of a day gone now victoria know i want to find out who is victoria newland right? this is the stuff that i think about victoria know, and that's relevant to her pro. so lensky stands, for example, she is a neo conservative to say the very leads to also happens to be married to one of the most prolific neo conservatives, perhaps. and us for and. busy the history, so his husband, per her husband, pardon me, is a guy named bob kagan, along with dick cheney and build crystal great pairing. huh. they actually together founded the neo conservative project back in 1997. they actually found it right. and then use that to push for the disastrous war. that was iraq. here's something else. i think this is fascinating. i don't know. you might find it

fascinating as well. well, no. and makes roughly a $180000.00 a year. as a government employee, i looked it up. she said to be worth anywhere between $2.00 to $8000000.00 conservatively. and though she works for the government for our government, she also has a long standing relationship with a private company that handles 4 and government affairs. and that would be the albright stonebridge group. look them up, it seems conflict the why because that those folks the by the way, named after the former us secretary state madeline albright albright stonebridge seems conflicted because they make their money handling complex diplomacy deals with countries all over the world, which means they kind of get to choose who are the good guys who are the bad guys? they do deals with them. they get paid by the way. that sounds off a lot like they're doing foreign policy. now this is what i want to dig into. so

when we come back, when we come back, what's this mean for ukraine? when the, some would say architect of our ukraine policy, these out. we're going to be joined by that guy right there. see him that's michael maloof said hi michael, former pedagogy official and george. some wally wrote bombs for peace nato's humanitarian war on yugoslavia. and he is an advisor at the global policy institute and we're coming right back. do not go away the one year to do the 2 at that point, but at 50 extra a month. i thought she sat there for the show and then it will here job to las negotiated. all of it is uh, excuse us for the defense of the supplement is setup button and

not the printer and i thought someone did you lose it asked for that if i said the media and not be focused on you to reason, could you say what would you say the video camera in tempe, miss of us generally present good deals for the work you've done. stimulus the industry. is it a lot of money in the process? really left? so should we inform her shots? my goodness, we have good cash door to door or decisions in my lab. and what was that man was the ones i've been thinking left on is i put in the organization based on them one today and bunch of deluxe. i've also left for the additional to set. i'm sure those are pretty sure can was i'm patient did it for she's kimble's, i'm best do what i mean there's a push out the

let's talk about this cause i think this is whole. this whole the victoria know what the thing is past that, and we're joined by michael maloof. as you know, michael maloof is a former pentagon official and we're also going to be joined as i told you about just a little bit earlier by george. so i'm well we welcome gentlemen michael, i begin with you and i'm thinking to myself here if i am zelinski sitting in care of and i'm wondering, so newland is out. wait, that's my go that's. that's my go to person in the us government. that's the one who helped me in 20. 14 is what must be thinking right now. he's probably seeing the handwriting on the wall. he's. i think this is a signal that it's over and that has offensive. if you can call it that me is not working. it's and it's a and he's having to retreat. well, it's interesting because that actually makes me think, can there be a ukraine policy without victoria newland? it seems like one hand goes with the other. no. well it's out of her. it's out of us hands at this point it's, it's becoming,

it's not only not only the russians taking the eastern part button, you have countries such as poland, lithuania, these other countries that have historical ties to west ukraine. it is. and the reason why she was just sell embedded in, in ukraine, is that her family came from what was the czar's russia, which is to the west to credit. so it's kind of like a part it would be like new and making sure the united states attacks cuba. yeah. but it's like a family came from 2 of them. yeah, that's strong. exactly. it's like a family feels good place at all. is person let's, uh, let's go to georgia somali of is your is, you know, is, is my life right? or are or does the ukraine policy hedge on her and is the fact that she's out say that it's going to be tough goings now for zalinski and his group. i'm not sure about that. i think that the united states a european is they are absolutely wedded to this policy of you're basically trying

to inflict the feet on russia it through you. great. i don't think it depends on victoria you. then she obviously has been a, a central thing up in the ukraine policy right from the beginning, you know, actually going back even to the 19 ninety's. however, i don't think us policy hangs on that. and even the noises that we're getting the, uh, a uh, from your up with my crown saying that there are no limits. there are no red lines in our support for, uh, ukraine. and then you know, the, the british what the rating, the germans with them for being insufficiently zealous and supporting your brain. i think we're a long, long way from any, any policy of abandoning events. but i, but, but here's where i think my goal is right. uh if, if we, if, if we had done the deal that was proposed a year ago or so with ukraine is the landscape. what is that? i'll take that deal, let the russians take that part of the country and,

and we're good, we're good. let's let, let's just finish this and he had taken it then he would have lost. i had them a lot less than he's losing now. so it just seems incrementally like it's certainly not going in his direction. wouldn't you argue? oh, that's absolutely right. i think um ukraine made the softest, absolutely catastrophic decision in listening to bars johnson and through bars jones up to the americans up sticking with that policy. but that just shows up to be determined, the british, the americans, and they do up to use ukraine to inflict a defeat on russia. because let's remember that deal that was on the table is stumble was not at all favorable to rush. it was actually very favorable to rush within the premium, negotiate before amazed at the concessions or options were making, but nonetheless, they rejected that deal because they, they thought they sold this opportunity ready to screw russia over so absolutely.

so let's get you a thinking that deals for that doesn't mean that the in the burden of americans and nature are abandoning this policy. right? no. okay, good. well, you guys, you're somebody disagreement on that and i'll accept that by the way. interestingly enough, as i recall, a lot of my putting told my friend tucker carlson, that he was willing to consider that deal and probably would have taken that deal back then. which is interesting looking at it. now if you know, if, if he in fact whatever not, we don't know. that's a part of history. now michael, back to you. i am bothered, i don't know if you listen to my intro, but i am bothered. what i this all bright stonebridge group that apparently she has worked for apparently she's a big to do. there is always blinking ins or a bunch of people in the bottom administration. when i read about this outfit, it sounds to me like they do like foreign policy, rather like a shadow government. if you will inform policy, you have to comp, pickering, also who belongs to it. and you have a lot of, admittedly, some real,

a rhino republicans who work, who are, are, are part of that establishment. and so there, there's sort of a, a government and waiting, and they advise on who will, who will not be a good candidate the way long. they all, they had to wait for, it was for bite him to get elected. because as soon as they got elected, he took all of them from that company and then put them into is the state department, the state department right now there's, there seems like there's some falling in that for me. i mean, well, we think because they're because they're a part of the company, that means they do deals with these. what other minutes over the republicans do it? they pull him out of out of heritage and, and, and other uh, think tank. submitted it, if it has conflict, if it seems to me, isn't it? well, it might be conflict, but that's the way it is in washington. and so, and so you can then make an argument that the reason we do the things we do, let's just pick your brain cuz we happen to be talking about. i don't want to pick too much. are you? great? so in, in many ways, the reason we're doing ukraine is because these guys, when they were, and those companies already had a standing policy or, or deals that they had done with you,

great in the government. but not only that now they're gonna work on their behalf. but, but they also had a near con, image of containment of russia. ukraine is just a stepping stone for russia. gotta keep that much. that's why i disagree with. what with my colleague here a little bit that the europeans are now beginning to understand the us got them into this mess. they're stuck with it. the us is thinking of pulling out, especially if trump were elect to be elected. but it's, and that affects nato. but let's leave, let's leave leave ukraine aside because now i'm like a dog with a bone stuck on this albright stonebridge thing. and i'm thinking of myself, man, it just sounds so incredibly corrupt. if you work for a government for, i'm sorry, if you work for a private company and that private companies, business is dealings with governments and you take money from those governments to do their deals. now you go work for the government and i pay you. and you are still going to do the same deals, but now you're going to do them on behalf of me and my government and the taxes that i pay you. that's a conflict of interest. no, i mean i mean that the,

you know, i that, that's kind of what i'm thinking here. george. no it is. but the thing is like the full bright stonebridge grew much like a live group. i mean these are private. what do they do? they go into a country and they secure the investment. so that's what they, they, these are, you know, you, you found the countries you pulverized of you install a friendly government the following in your color revolution and then you make money. and that's the whole, the whole point of that, the old right, stonebridge will they make money, they go there with their own clients. and you know, how do i really invest in this country? and that's and that's what they do in and over item particular, she made a lot of money on cost. so that was she was the big bomber in chief of costa though in the 90s. and then they pay for us. so i can make a lot of money here, and that's how people like, um, doland get rich for themselves. yeah. that sounds corrupt as hell. i mean, just,

just to my see right now that i mean, it sounds unbelievably corrupt and you were about to go there. but if it's true, as i read that she makes, she has anywhere between $2.00 and $8000000.00 and that's very conservative. i mean, she's gotten rich off of her government position, trading, what she knows or contacts and her deals while pretending to be really working for the government of the united states when she really wasn't my overstating. am i being fair on fair? that's exactly what it, so you go, you go the georgia promise, georgia state. you're going to have um, in the nato membership down the road. i'm a, let's make some money. let's so, you know, let's, let's do a deal. let's, let's sign a contract. let's say investigated, let's invest that and there's a lot of money to do it because these companies like this, the old rags stonebridge grew. they have clients like clients. well, when they go make money, they want to go and invest in these countries that are big. i mean, clients,

states of the united states. so why, you know, politicians are part of, i mean that's of allows these filthy rich. so is the mcconnell, by the way, all they do is take a, you know, they take a salary of a 100, a couple, couple $100000.00 a year and somehow they end up in may of the millions of dollars. so, but in this case, these are not even elected officials. these are the members of the cabinets of all the different president republicans or democrats. shouldn't we do something to stop this? couldn't there be a rule if you, for example, here's a simple the rick sanchez role, making it up as we go here. if you work for auburn stone, right? or stone bridge or whatever that was calibrate, you can't work. you can take a job and the government for at least 3 or 4 years, but we are just kept doing great. we do that with defense companies. but with our generals, and when they retire, when they wait 3 or 4 years, then they get it as a r r. they get waivers from congress? well, i do. well, that's what the austin got. i mean, that's all we became secretary defense right after he chose the apparently worth over 10000000. well he has, he was with, i believe lockheed so you know, it,

it's so embedded in our, in our culture, our, our governing culture. how you get rid of it, and you won't be able to because it's so, but then if we don't get rid of it every time somebody tells me that we have to give a $100000000.00 to ukraine or but you want a lab or wherever that how, what was the name of the country? my 1st question is, are we giving it to him because they need it? or are we going to get to it? because there's some people there for cronies who are going to get rich off. well, that's why you need a congress that's on top of things that can do oversight and question these kinds of things. they actually have to approve the budgets and then what happen, they can question those things and, and bring it out. but then say they're not, they're too busy fiddling around or, you know, of george i, i've left to think that there's no way forward except a way that doesn't look very good because of this path continues. whether it's a rom, guys of ukraine, of china, the south try to say russia,

i mean all i see is opportunities for people to get rich during conflictive or conflicts, wars conflagrations. then that means that these things are going to keep it happening. well that's why newland, it has, has, has been involved in non stop wars, so it's from afghanistan and, and, and, and then iraq. yeah. and all of this, i got you all wild up now, so let me get, let me, let sports here to george. go ahead, you're right. yeah, so that's way right, because michael mentioned about the need for congressional oversight, but because the way they rigged it in congress is that they can never be any oversight because these bills, 1000 page bills, they arrive and then you have the mind within about 2 hours so no one, no one can possibly get through a 1000 page bill into as and find what's in the and, and that's what so, yeah, absolutely. what least huge amounts of money important here that no one knows what the hell to doing. because unless you assign them a service,

i'm not going to be paid. and imagine of all sections almost going to be paid. the numbers are like, well, we have to, we have to actually sign. and the couple of us to know really knows what the handles in the bill, and you literally have to go to russian television to find out about these things because you're not going to hear it from that as a group or you're not going to hear it from anybody on fox, you're not gonna be here at american newspapers. all these things that are going on that we as americans should know about, because we love this country and why don't they want them it. and it just makes me crazy to know that most of my fellow citizens don't know about the things that are being done in their name. in their name michael george, you guys are great, guessed interesting discussion. great conversation will do it again before i go. i want to remind you of our mission here that we try and have these conversations because we think it's important and we don't want to live in the. so i'm on the right or i'm on the left or whatever. no twos don't live in the right or in the left to serve everywhere. we should talk about them wherever they are. i'm rick

sanchez. i'll be looking for you again right here. but i hope to provide a direct impact the the, the today in the united states. all foreign policy establishment on national security establishment is whether or not you person becomes a cloak for our own aggression. it becomes a way of flushing other countries on the back for our record shows that we're not really that much democracy that we have on those 3 of interfering in other countries when they produce democratic outcomes. we don't like the

was a major issue. they pretty doing it by giving me the conditional insurance will i find you appreciate the goals and because of the issues simply with blue cross, you will get to the cities because of the consortia, the cases i chose coast mcadams. whenever you're ready to spell the name, just you pretty much the folks that are on the road. norma jean, you will, you will with it. the 1st, the most important thing to visit on some of the risk adjust to the point of this is what are you able to study successful? he wants to build some of the key treasures to go additional for 3. don't know if i'm forward to for, for most of which might get her in the

or distressing. so th, from southern gaza as citizens of bodies are buried in a mass grave of the being were tubs to the and baffled and plays by israel. also this out government decision that gives alter, also to excuse the privilege known to bear with for the, for the army is valid until the end of march this year. a war time, a national conversation about city as well as some of the will for a tease to review legislation that exempt so old for orthodox students from military service. we hear from a member of that religious community offers the particular people said, well, you know, of the spiritual thing, whatever you want to play, you can come to play. now one thing was quite clear and.