is because now you're saying it, and it's very strong because you've got the endorsement from the outside plus the fact that, that, that dichotomy of the room in the, even there are you aspiration levels and ruling, they have changed. and if you and i've worked there with that foundation, because of 800000000 people don't have aspirations, it doesn't make a difference. how big the other $400.00, because the divide wouldn't be stronger. i think that divide is not going to guide and extend. anyone feels i can make a difference in the country if anyone and everyone feels i can make a difference. when the right place the colorado snippets of let's talk about off, which are is which premieres today? i like to make sure. all right, a reminder for up to the moment developments of this monday, our website has covered head on over to r t dot com for all the latest global i'm russian updates analysis plus online program recordings are available completely free. you will be bored by

the the, what is a part of the, the employee would post code? is it the defense you of us entered into word? or is it something deeper, more complex might be present? good. let's stop without pleases. let's go products. as the fellow again

everybody, amex sanchez, that you know, i've worked at 4 or 5 of the biggest television networks in the united states. and i frankly have a bit of a problem with the way they cover news these days. now we're doing a newscast here. every single day we're daily. okay, and i'm sure you probably notice, so we get an opportunity to see all the big stories that happen throughout the span of the week. and now what we're going to do is going to compile all of those stories. we're gonna try and put them together in order of importance. i'm going to share them with you and then wake them apart. talk about why they matter, or maybe why they don't. this is direct impact. the right, let me bring you up to date on some of these big stories that we're referring to just a little while ago that again, you likely would not have seen if you were watching television news. just lets say

in the united states, i think the biggest story is victoria maryland. victoria newland is out at the state department. there's something that goes with that too. did you see what happened with president zalinski is wife. man, she did something really weird that we're going to be talking about george galloway . oh, my goodness, the george galloway tape. it's the tape that's being seen around the world. and i'm gonna let you see a part of it because you're going to be talking about it for some time. joe biden says, no. or what is the right? i mean, he says, no, but the gods of war is escalating. it is escalating as both these just what happened this week? german general scott, right handed, planning an attack on russia. boy, that's something you've got to listen to. i mean, talk about getting caught red handed. it really is a case of that in the spring board. it's saying that mr. trump will be on all the ballots in the united states, all 50 states. also this wire us troops now patrolling new york some ways. a kind

of weird. i think. i don't know what you think. and china, it says to can play this game. they're telling us tech companies get out a drive. all right, we're joined now by our panel. i've got a nixon is the host of be critical. our on sputnik jamal thomas, who's lines on the sputnik. i talked to these guys all the time about things that are going on in the world and that we get to share some of our thoughts with you. let's start with victoria new and how big a deal is that your model, the fact that she is out and what's the signal that that's ends, let's say you are, let's just say for tenure of a lot of mere jewel zalinski right now. and you just turn this news, what do you think? oh my god, we're not going to continue to support me. that would be my 1st let me give you my victoria newland as one of the architects of that war. i mean, and you know, cookies and all this other stuff. um yeah, she is directly related to pushing an agenda emerging church can ukraine was the main point. here's how it was presented here in the united states. let's tell us

the dates in precise context of the recording and not known, and you'd under the us some precedent to ukraine. jeffrey piet's discuss which of the countries opposition leaders they'd like to see in government. and they refer to getting the un involved. so that would be great, i think, to help glue this thing and how the u. n. help fluid and you know, the, you know, exactly, and i think we've got to do something to make it stick together because you can be pretty sure that if it does, if it does start to gain altitude, the russians will be working behind the scenes to try to torpedo it. now i probably don't have to tell you garland where that was about. if you listen to it, you know that that was the smoking gun that seemed to prove to most people around the world that victoria newland had everything to do in 2014. with that could a talk where she tried to get rid of a democratically elected president in ukraine since the, and she's been running the entire operation. same sprites. how important do you

think this decision is today? and do you think it's going to have an effect or no, or do you agree with them? i think it's very important that i think the people that will be the most concerned will be the very hawkish leaders in europe. i think they understand that they're the, the, the support for the ukraine. neil con project is waning in the united states, particularly in congress that donald trump is a ripple in the republican party now. and they're not getting any money out of congress. and i think they're now concerned at their most ardent support or the person that would keep the u. s. machine focused on ukraine is gone and that we only have an effect on their ability to maintain a continuity. you don't think there's it on there. are there people around her? i mean, uh, who will no doubt continue to push this thing and see if they can make it happen. yeah, imagine the main job. i just want to give a speech tonight is state of the union talk about we're going to be with your brain for as long as it takes a while, but newly is particularly can take or so, i mean give you my team direct for one of those think she's worked with dick cheney at one point meeting she is. she's like neil calling from new god. well,

you spoke about that state of the union and i think one of the weirdest things that i've seen in a long time, and i don't know if you guys know about this, but there's something going on right now where the 1st lady misses cilenzo the lens gov is that pronounced correctly because when you pronounce a females name and russian right, you actually changed it a little bit. so president is a landscapes wife, has decided that even though she was invited by the us government and by joe biden, the 1st lady of the united states to go and sit next to her at the state of the union. she said, no, she's not going to sit next to her. and the reason she's decided not to say next door is because apparently novalis wife was also invited and she said if she's going, i'm not going. apparently they don't want each other. and apparently it has to do with something i've always said about garden meal. but what a weird situation said this woman who is essentially the 1st lady of ukraine. yes.

is invited to sit next to the 1st lady of the united states and she says, no, i'm not going to go well. and it also goes to show that below this argument that this entire ukrainian problem started in february of 2022. that there was a long, historical background to your involving. i mean, you could go all of a way back to the crusades and why are they calculate from the neighbor river on to poland and how they, you know, the procedures got stopped the beginning of the river. but the bottom line is when it comes down to it, 0 is a deep intellectual conversation to be had about ukraine. it's not just about vladimir putin woke up one day and got angry just and i think this is evidence that there is more to this conflict than meets the eye. here is the 1st lady of ukraine giving a speech. this is not a speech recently. this is when she was invited by nancy pelosi to speak in and around congress. here it is. usually the wise of presidents are exclusively engaged in peaceful affairs, education, human rights, equality, uh,

accessibility. and maybe you expected from me to speak on those topics. but how can i talk about them when and amazon for loca, and provoke, invasive terrorist war is being waged against? and my country of russia is destroying all with people to do this just, i'm so sorry for saying this, and i don't mean to be disrespectful. but it seems like something you would hear about in high school. it's, it's, i mean it's keep in mind that story, but the us has given us all of the started on, you know, just recently in 2020 to met. that was a long history and the way the goal of pointing out there was a historical context, right. and for whatever reason, in order to justify all of the money and everything else that we've been putting into this particular conflict, we've had to ignore reality itself out to just trying to take over all of europe. that seems to be the way they are going in those place a little and she was pushing in a speech. i want to show you guys something now, because did you want to say something i would add this and here's another reality

that i suspected. first, she hates russians. there isn't, there was an, an ethnic racism, whatever you want to call it, that here the unit that is in, in the ukraine that the united states has pushed to take advantage of to make short for many, many years only back to the fifty's and the band there at the band, right aid the russians and i think part of it is she's not going to sit next to one of those things was in or is less there. right? to a foot and yeah, but she also hates devolving, which is interesting. in fact, apparently that zalinski government hates and of all me in the off that there are even citing with just last week and there was a report the mom a had been killed by putting the ones who came out and said no to that and killing me died of natural causes. yeah. but again, you get back to this, they just hate broccoli, kids, and they're happy to see another russian day and they're not gonna sit next door russians. they don't want to sing a russian song. they don't want to a street named after a russian, and i think that's what it comes down to it. she can't go back to the band of

rights and say, oh yeah, i sat next to a russian person and smile. so they have that in common with the with, with victoria noted on. right. seems like although victoria no one is making money . rush i, she's worth somewhere between $2.00 and $8000000.00, even though she makes a government salary of $180000.00. i've always wondered how you get to those big figures when you're in a government job, but i think we could figure it out in the case of victoria. no. yeah, she will be fine. as a will be fine. yeah, she works really. all right, don't bridge organization, which essentially does our foreign policy when they're not working for the government. it's a freaking thing. all right, here we go. this is i think one of the best moments of the week. this is the esteemed george galloway after returning to the british parliament. being asked of question by a reporter and it's fascinating as you watch this because it may be you tell me what you think after you watch this. and you can do so on twitter and rick sanchez,

tv. and you don't think this is one of the best take downs of a corporate type reporter that you've seen in a long time. here it is. i don't respect the members. do i respect the prime minister? i despise the prime minister and get millions and millions and millions of people in this country despise the prime minister. i don't respect the prime minister at all. there is something about him standing up to somebody who's giving your lot. i love it, i love it, i love it. what are you? a lot of a because the foreigner is often times when somebody is doing an interview like that. they're actually a particular question. putting you on the spot with you and asking you to question in a way that kind of suggests the answer that you expect to get. so i think it was the prime minister because that's all things like research. so that came up basically, batch do. are you know, you don't have any feelings about that to not only do i not respect this buys. yeah

. yeah. it's like, you know, beyond, i don't care. yeah. it's not just vice prime minister. so you're bringing this. i think even what we said you acting like he bought down the 10 commandments. what he just was watching that i wasn't just thinking about what you said, which is, you know, putting a reporter in his bite for asking a stupid question. i'm almost thinking that there are people in this world and especially in the western media that if you said to them something like, do you know that there may be another perspective than the one that your sharing do? you know, for example, there's a different perspective than what you believe in terms of israel's right to go in there and kill so many palestinians. do you know there's a different perspective on the ukranian story? do you know what happened in 2014 and ukraine? they would look at you like you have horns coming out of your head. and i got the sense that when he said that bright garland, to that reporter when he challenged that reporter with, why are you bringing up the prime minister's name like i have to bow. what do you

say is name is a lot of people disagree with the prime minister that the reporter did not understand that. right? because i think i saw that that a reporter as a personal sales, we have a certain protocol, particularly in britain, england. we must be printing properties and we must so respects to the institutions, etc. there are people that are furious at these institutions and by carry this week through a george galloway, they're saying that so george galloway said, no, i'm not going to respect your protocol. i'm going to stand up for these people in the street that are suffering and say to you, go jump in a lake, we don't like it. he's saying there is another perspective out there. yeah, you need to listen to it as well. and apparently he made the point very fortunately in ways that i've never seen it made perhaps so well, i'm gonna show you a piece of video right now. and when we come back, i want you guys to talk about this. what you're going to see right now, right here,

are german generals, as they're actually discussing what it is that they plan to do in russia. take a look at this, i came to the conclusion that there are 2 interesting target, some of the bridge in the east and the munition depos above originally east is hard to reach. it's a rather sorry target for the tourist can be admonished. indeed most also about it . and even if we consider the bridge, i don't think taurus is enough. we need to have an idea of how with money for, for the satellite data. you know, i don't know if we can train the premiums for such a task in a short time, and we're talking about a month. they're talking about bombing a russian bridge. they're talking about bombing a russian bridge. when we come back, we'll take that apart as well. stay with us. don't go with the

the the, the, [000:00:00;00] the

the the welcome back. i'm rick sanchez, is a special edition of direct impact where we, where we talk through the stories of the week and i've got to tell you, i found this story to be absolutely fascinating. and after i listen to these, these german generals for a long time planning a bombing of a russian bridge using a tourist missile. i can't help but ask myself, are they trying to start war 3? are they trying to start voice more 3. i mean, is this what these guys are doing? here's a piece of that of that leaked audio tomorrow kind. we'll see how it doesn't matter . we need to ensure that from the very beginning present, there is no mention that would make us a lot of the conflicts. might i'm exaggerating a bit,

but if we tell the minister now that we plan meetings and we'll drive by call from problems and all so that no one notices that's already participation and we want to do that. so let me ask you the question that i just asked our esteemed viewers all over the world. are they trying to start world war 3? so, you know, i think that one of the things that this shows is that they don't really believe the propaganda that vladimir putin is a made man. they can't be trusted. that they don't really believe that because they believe that they wouldn't take these kind of chances that they believe they can get away with it. and even if they get caught, they feel like, well, he's reasonable, he's not going to attack us. i see what you're saying. there that's interesting because all we hear about putting is he's a madman, he's a bad man. he's about to invade all of europe. oh my god. and you can't take those kind of chances with a minute. it may again. basically let's say no, we don't, we don't, we don't, we, we must not think much of him bad. exactly. right. i mean, do you think that the, the german chancellor knew that this was happening? no,

i mean it the way the conversations that he says when at the chance and we're going to go from so and so and so, and so, and he even makes the point of saying like, you know, we don't want to be involved. we don't want any fingerprints, so in and everything else is unclear whether it's towards muffles, obviously, or. so this is a big space thing itself, like i mean, the german, they just, i do what they kept coming to, you know, as the story is the one that's running, the german government did schultz know. and even when the story broke, germany freaked out, we said we're going to do an investigation to figure out when we came from ignoring the contents of a week to yes, yes, oh my gosh, that is so important. i'm so glad you say that part of my passion responding to what you just said, but if there's one and i'm glad you said that, and that's why we're having this conversation. if 1st of all, i'm a journalist, you know what i love other than my wife and my kids, and my producers and i always love to mix. yeah. i love leaks, thinking i'm all for needs as many links. as of course,

i don't want the atomic bomb or government secrets that can hurt somebody. but generally speaking of you know, something about my government that i, as a citizen should know, i want that lead. that's why i respect julia massage and everything and that he's done. we just heard the german chancellor come out and essentially say not as you say, if we're going to go after these generals for doing this, for planning a pac on russia, which could literally create a world wide conflagration. no, he says we're going to investigate how this link got out. that's crazy. well and it, it just goes to show that he actually understands how powerless he is. he already understands that he's powerless in the face of the us power of using the face of us imperialism. but he realizes that within his own government, he's powerful. he understands, as they all do, that in this me a fraudulent, a ukrainian proxy war that all of the neo cons in the hopes around the you are getting their opportunity to throw a missile. were

a rock any time they want to. but oh, la schultz knows. he understands the limits of his power. let's talk about donald trump. yes. because this announcement was made by our steam to media. but using that word a lot. during this newscast here it is. we've learned that it was a 9 to nothing decision ruling that donald trump can be on. the ballad in colorado and other states, even justices during the oral argument, seemed very skeptical of the idea that one state could decide for the nation. whether donald trump was an insurrection, us, and it was therefore disqualified under this 150 year old provision. now there's a lot of talk in the united states, certainly on the last gentleman that uh, this is a supreme court that's bought and sold, but it's donald trump's supreme court. it's a conservative court. so of course, they were going to put donald trump on the court on, on the pallets, despite the fact that he's a quote unquote insurrection is ok. the argument,

except it's not, i'm not an unpopular argument, a fair argument, but here's the problem. and where i tend to side with this particular supreme court decision. i said earlier in the week on one of our newscasts. if you allow one state to side or decide who is allowed to run in that state, then what will have i fear in the future is a case where if you have $25.00 republican states you, you're going to have $25.00 states where the democrat is not allowed to run. and if you have $25.00 democrats states, you're going to have $25.00 states where the republic is not gonna be allowed to run. and that will, will really create hell in this process, the high opinion, what do you, what do you said, really? i mean it to be fair. it's one of the arguments the supreme court made themselves. i mean, i say congress shouldn't make this decision. and not the state, right, but when you were actually in the argument, this was when did the thing, the basically came up, this kind of came around system of governance and everything else. well, reality of it is they are trying to say that donald trump, so i've been lucky,

i'm not a fan of 12. 0, so like i need to add, okay, that's okay. we're not here. a little 9 justices 3 of which were liberal justices that still came down on the exact same side. say, you can't do this once. they can't pull a man on the ballot for why he wasn't charged with them to direction. mm. to he wasn't convicted and it's a direction. i think another copy gets big like made for examples like yeah, i know i'm just a secretary of state, but screw it, we're going to go to colorado and i think where they're wise, if you'll allow me is garlan. when they say, if you want to call them an instruction is then congress has to come out and put that stamp on his forehead and them after they do that, they can make a decision that ends or insurrection is, are not allowed to run, cause what happened after the civil war, the united states were candidates, were removed because, sorry, you were on the wrong side. i'm not sure there's enough proof for that in this case . or am i wrong? i agree with the person that that has to be convicted of something there has to be some of factual evidence to show that they, that he was, that is

a final decision. ok, he's, he's an interaction if that hasn't happened to the other part. oh, i believe he invited all those people who ended up acting as insurrection as that day. but i don't think because he invited them and then they did something that he gave them exact marching orders. yeah. my problem. yes. my point is there's been no finding of fact correct. he's done that so you don't have anything in the other part of it is the slippery slope. the next thing that kind of a state does is they pass a ruling in the state. you can't ronnie of x. yeah. and then they can use state law, and now that has to go and you don't want to open the door for that for the, for states to be able to find various methods within their own state to disqualify federal. let's talk about something else ready when i go to latin america and the caribbean, which i'm sure you guys have gone to. one of the things is always bother me when i go there. and especially with my wife and kids as i go to the beach and there's a guy in the military fatigues and my young gun go. yeah, my god or something, i don't know that they're putting uh you know,

this stuff up sooner by way. and same thing at the store, same thing at the parks, and i've always wanted a man. i'm so glad i live in a country. we don't see the military visually out there. well, guess what? look at these pictures. look at us. this is new york by the way. oh sorry, i jumped ahead. let's do that story. let's do this. this is not, this is not the sub. okay. we, we are going and some with, okay, look at this, this is the sub ways of new york city. and there are now troops, a 1000 of them really 250 troopers and 750 national guard. same people we sent to iraq and afghanistan. they're now in new york city, petroleum and subways. i don't like the price of freedom rick price of freedom. what does that mean? i don't know what these jobs do. it said it was just ready with a no. i said it's a horrible look, i think. but look, are we like it's one thing is the cops military is different. so that's,

that's my point. yes. is. can i speak to dare i say 3rd world, a little bit. i mean, the military is, you know, so like ford parties not domestic. and it's a little bit strange to see military as pulls the cops during the job. and the question is, why, why on earth did you have to go to national guard as opposed to using your own police force in order to jump what's going on to deal with that semester? well, of 3 people, dad, in the last couple of months, a conductor had a stroke flushed. a couple of things are going out of new york. i'll take another position. you know, i was retired, want force me when i go back and look at the guys in my and girls in my agency. i don't know. that's what they look like. and i, you didn't tell me the way the cops are dress now in fatigues with the ones if you didn't tell me that they weren't soldiers in a lot of states. i wouldn't know. i just think they, they were cops that are cops had been so military. right. yeah. cit oftentimes they're running around in the year. yeah. intakes. yeah. they have different missions like that,

like from my point is like your diversity on. it's because you are, you've been the previous police officer, but the military from one of you has a job of dealing with foreign advertisers, were sending them over there to do something. which is the reason why it's so bad that they're militarize in a plea for it, for the police, for so that's what would be a gets the citizenry that to me is. yeah, i gotta tell you it's, it's a picture. i never thought i'd see. i don't like looking at it and we're not talking about a disturbance or a riot. we're just talking about another day in new york. yeah. and saying troops on the streets in some ways is not a pretty picture. thanks so much guys for coming in. thanks. so much for this conversation, i think this is important. i'm glad we do it this way. this is direct impact. thanks so much for being with us because, you know, our mission is pretty simple. here. we are really just trying to not keep the troops in little boxes where you got to be on one side or another. truth is everywhere, complex and should be looking for you again, right here really help to provide

a direct effect. the the the, by the middle of the 20th century, the portuguese colonial empire was in an acute crisis. a particularly 10 situation had developed in mozambique the people of this country were put in

a humiliating position, income inequality ramp, and illiteracy. this respect by the portuguese for the local traditions led to mass unrest, getting 1964 the liberation front of mozambie for a limo. began its armed struggle for freedom. the regular army was not easy to resist, but the guerrillas inflicted considerable damage on the invaders through the sliders, against the colonial regime were supported by the soviet union and china. whereas the united states and great britain took the side of the invaders, the board to gaze responded to the guerrillas attacks with cruel counter insurgency . however, pre limos 10 year courageous struggle was a success after the overthrow of the fascist regime in portugal in 1974, the new what the already surrendered. a year later, lisbon fully recognized the independence of mozambie,

bought the victory had been gained at a high price during the war, mozambique had lost tens of thousands of his sons and daughters. the clashes are wrapped in east jerusalem at the idea prevents many muslims from entering the lunmark. our accent most is going to be div of rama down more raging and guns up south africa as president slums. an opposition party request for the us to oversee upcoming elections in the country calling you to attempt to grow mortgage. our democracy also had this our. it's the final count done in russia. citizens bureau to vote in the 1st presidential election since the arctic all the main conflicts of the own president, the western pressure which followed. we have exclusive coverage of the build up to