tv The 360 View RT March 19, 2024 4:30pm-5:01pm EDT
4:30 pm
will on media as many thanks. thank you sir. and that is where we even use run off for now. i will be back in 30 with more of the stories, not always being highlighted elsewhere, are to make sure you don't miss any of the updates. the what is part of the blog post that isn't the deepest view of us and that in the word part is it something deeper, more complex might be present to that stuff without collision. that's going part of the a
4:31 pm
pop culture. empower or predestined to intertwine, and there is nothing one can do to keep them separate. however, what does it say about an electric which can be influenced by a but dazzled celebrity, or an athletes opinion rather than a well educated professional. as both the presidential contenders continued to speak and boast of star endorsement. on this edition of 360 the, we're going to look at the role pop culture is going to play the 2020 for presidential election on sky. now here's, let's get started. the president job i is looking to fuel his re election bid within or doors limit for one of the nation's biggest stars taylor swift. meanwhile,
4:32 pm
donald trump is se if taylor endorses biden, it would be just loyal because he quote, made her so much money that the trump is trying to tell his donors. he is more popular than the international pop star, and his base is larger and more loyal. and this with these army. a trump enjoys a base of supporters with proven and movable. swiss fans have also become known for their die hard commitment to are now one instagram post from the center about national voter registration de caused a 1226 percent increase in traffic to the website. she directed it to vote dot org. the non parson, non profit required recording more than $35000.00 registrations as a 23 percent jump from the mid terms election year of 2022. so this isn't the 1st time donald trump and taylor swift have traded words back in 2018 taylor swift. he
4:33 pm
came out of his testing center, marshall blackburn, and told her band to vote for the opponent a democrat, the in about 25 percent less but i'm not so old. remember when the 1st crossover of pop culture in the politics actually cause career ending damage? the year was 2003, and on a stage in london, natalie maines of the popular country band, formerly known as the dixie chicks, spoke to the crowd just days before the invasion of iraq, british and the president united states. this statement once published by the guardian started a domino effect of music and concert sales plummeting and major sponsors like
4:34 pm
lifting ice tea, pulling their promotional contract with the group. and while that single event might have hurt the dixie chicks standing in the music business, the attention is rude of politics and pop culture. show the power celebrities garner to not only put a spotlight on an issue, but more important persuading ideology onto there during fans. now this power has only been amplified by technology and the development of social media. let's discuss how pop culture is going to play in the 2024 election with our guess. dusty k robinson, health professional do, and media analyst and media and political analysts line. oh, thank you so much for joining me. indeed. okay, so this is somewhat might consider a very superficial topic. i mean, obviously pop culture is going to have an effect on politics. however, i'm gonna start with you, jesse. do you think we are overestimating our under estimate, the effect pop culture has on politics today?
4:35 pm
i don't know if we could necessarily say that it can be over or underestimated. i think it's relative to what we have come to understand about the infusion of popular culture and media within the landscape. i think it's always been a part of it in 3rd world countries where there had been high level levels of literacy, they had always used radio to inform citizens about candidates. even the roll out of the b, b. c. increased readership in the 1920s. and we've had a succession of media and popular culture infused. i mean, you could look all the way from not necessarily the news and the 1980s to editorial cartoons to mtv is rosabelle wrote in, in the ninety's, even s and l. sketches and weekend updates. have always had a highlight and a commentary around politics and that is often times how people even
4:36 pm
learn about some of the issues that are being raised. it is through popular culture, but like i know, you know, in the last 20 years, people have said they get their news and their information more from a place like comedy central than from the 5 p. m. news has pop culture change and the in fluids. it has on politics, whether before people now looked at the source of information, not necessarily just a source of humor. well, 1st of all, to segregate as somehow different or, or the legitimate, i think is incorrect. you know, the right part doctrine says that politics is down stream from culture. and the emphasis here is popular called here. you know, a couple of things happened. you mentioned the dixie chicks sometimes in effect, doesn't work as thought the dixie chicks went against a well we thought was a rather unpopular perhaps republican president george bush, that didn't work. kathy griffin came out against donald trump. she was black bone
4:37 pm
who can figure this thing out. neil young decided to go after joe rogan, regarding his dodge his flip and allegedly flipping comments regarding vaccines in the light. and joe rogan was forced to issue an apple load you are threatening to pull him. so since the days of frank capra, and by the way, pop culture, but perhaps culture as in propaganda, during world war to capture a warner, everybody use movies. so i would respectfully submit the pop culture is more important than quote news media, especially with dwindling news rooms being shuttered daily. but how do you keep the standard then to be something that you're not having this invitation of propaganda isn't. if you're wondering is that's what people are going to be looking for. how do you keep a standard of what's the truth and not? and what's the detector of that duffy? but if i knew the answer to that, i bottle it, sell it, and i'd be
4:38 pm
a wealthy woman. i think that power always is what dictates what is popular, what is politically relevant. and so i think the question is really, who has the, who has the power and who's to say where the winds will blow what, what celebrity will get cancelled? you know, which i'm not sure if i even agree. oh idea. cancel culture. i think account ability, culture is probably more in line with what uh, you know, that is and i would say that and i think that i would agree, i think that popular culture, it lives in the imagination of people well. and that's the thing. why know? because some people look at the go, you know what, keep at a keep athletics separate from pop, coal, or from politics, keep music separate, separate from politics i. they look to the elements and make a pop culture to escape politics. is that just unrealistic?
4:39 pm
before a football game, there are examples of military and fly overs and the national anthem. what are the natural ends i'm have to do with the baseball game? i never even understood that one. and the idea, you know, we sometimes you, in my generation, i remember um walter cronkite and that was the gold standard. walter cronkite was dod uh cnn. i remember when seen and 1st started, that was the, that was the gold standard episode. terrific. then we have done lemon case closed book, you may like something, laugh at something you may consider a song to be relevant from stephen stills. his song for what it's worth with. buffalo springfield became the anthem against the vietnam war, a song, it was always used to punctuate what people say popular culture and news are the same. you might look at something in, by the way, sometimes people in our world will look heartily at social media or some, a rapper or a song or a senior as the old news. what did they know?
4:40 pm
and that's not the truth. excuse me. what is the truth? you define that one? tell me what is valid. i know people who look at their phone and if it's facebook, but as long as they're getting something. but you do one thing and i say about it. either you get on board it or just forget about it because you better understand this is a new world, a completely new world. well into line those point debbie, are you right? yes. i agree with them and my, my mind is blown with how much i agree with you all, but, i mean, even think about the martin luther king holiday. there were so many people, you know, we sort of have this amnesia about how a vitriolic people were against martin luther king and what and, and how many lee. but now they are heroes that martin luther king holiday was had to go through so many rounds of congress and it was when stevie wonder came out with this happy birthday song that really turn the tide. so in that case,
4:41 pm
you say the pop culture are obviously issues change, but at the same time we don't trust the media. we don't trust the politicians. could you say that people now are going to start looking at elements of pop culture because they are becoming so infused and not trust that movies have an agenda. now, anything on netflix because the obama is, are behind it. people don't trust because it's pushing a certain narrative virgin. same thing with music. is that not a danger, lionel? what do you say 2 things? what is the most important things that never happened regarding one of the most important red po, subject of my life. and that's what j f k, assassination was oliver stone's j. okay. was a movie, it's strange family thing. where did this approach? her film debut on the horizon, rivera shell like 9075. and then they also they use of the and i, and i love the, tell this to my for i just basically to visit one of the most important and, and size make event that happened recently was kat williams auto club che,
4:42 pm
dead completely changed every thing in terms of how we view this tucker carl, since interview with vladimir bowden, just with world wide the, this is causing conventional mainstream media to say, wait a minute, what are we doing in terms of numbers and metrics and excitement? you can't beat that, but most people in the news business say, well, that's not news. those are journalist. oh, really more people know who they are. then who is the people who, who laugh at them are? well, the good news is our audience. so who the 2 of you are and you're going to stay? because after the break, when we come back, we're going to look at how social media platforms like facebook and ex, have only super sides. the power pop culture has in politics today. chica room. there's a life kaleidoscopic, isn't just
4:43 pm
a shifted reality distortion by power to division with no real opinions. fixtures designed to simplify will confuse who really wants a better wills, and is it just as a chosen few fractured images presented as for us? can you see through their illusion going underground can or ok welcome back. you're watching 360 view and i'm a scott, i know he's, you know, jazz k junior used a magazine article to help promote literacy in the community. there wasn't any backlash. in fact, he was praised for this innovative idea all way beyond the point where pop culture can be used to make the world an actual better place. or is that unrealistic, utopian thinking?
4:44 pm
was ask our panel rubber, bryce in a great joins as jesse k, robinson, a health professor dula and media analyst and of course line on media and political analysts. thank you so much for joining us for ice and welcome to the party. you are a person who has benefited from pop culture and politics crossing over your i known within the rep can be prior, but definitely your, your in your creation of a song about trump major name more of a household name, especially amongst trump support span. i'll talk to you a little, but do you feel like we should be using pop culture in more responsible ways influenced good behavior? not necessarily political, ideological positions. of course, i haven't even made a political song necessarily in like years i've been focusing on more family messaging and messaging around my face. and that seems to hate people in their heart more of the issue of pop culture and politics and other things. as you do
4:45 pm
have to do it in a positive way, we have to create our own celebrities and our own pop culture icons, because the industry is not going to let us do it. i've had multiple billboard starting phones and that i still don't let me anywhere close to certain areas because my messaging is too controversial, and your messaging is usually like say family values controversial. that's what's interesting about this. jesse, in your case, when you look at it, should there be any accountability when pop culture gets it wrong and they later have to back track kind of what they should they apologize at least, i think apologies with actions are really what matter. and i don't know if i missed this, i really think that pop culture icons should be responsible for being role models . but what i do think is that people with very large prep platforms should be responsible. busy for what they have power to do and, and that includes inciting riots and is creating chaos in concerts.
4:46 pm
i think that you have to be responsible for the reach and the in the spread of your platform for them. that's interesting cuz i'll bring in the legal side of that line old. there's currently several trial is going on a rap artist that they are putting the blame for a rise in violent crimes. specific crimes industry is based on the lyrics of certain music. they've also tribute, obviously the video games uh to the mass school shootings. are we in 3? is should there be a form of law that has to deal with this sector? absolutely not. the listen. i've been listening to this since in my days when they were playing, paul is dead, supposedly the play, the beatles records backwards, and why anybody would play them backwards. i have no idea that there was ozzy osborne, there's a be with rap. i remember to live grow. i remember talking to luke skywalker, whatever years ago in, in, in, in florida. and i said this is a song. now i may listen to a song about violet and not be violent. what if i listen to the bible?
4:47 pm
what if i took the message of watch daughters and i were not an advocate? incest. i mean at a band, the bible right now, as we speak, mind comp isn't the new york public library, but they want to that's ok. listen when we get into book burning and information, if you don't like it, turned it off. well, and that's the thing, bryce. and because you have seen the calling and the blaming of politicians who have recognized how powerful pop culture is having their corner or should the resume blame place on a population who can be persuaded by celebrities so easily to vote just because their favorite person tells them to i think both deserves some responsibility as a rap artist, i mean there's levels you have wrapped in the form of drill wrap, where they're literally talking about crowds and talking about real people that died. i'm talking about real people that they have killed and real game wars. i do think that clearly they are a means of crimes and songs while being there is level to it. as well as taking responsibility. if you have influence, you know,
4:48 pm
you have influence. what are you doing with your influence? now? they shouldn't be legally responsible in any way, but they should be called out. they should be rebuilt and they should be exposed and hopefully people recognize that and follow the light rather than the dark. well, it does say, obviously social media platforms, the last 20 years haven't grown the reach that even grass roots, people apart, pop culture influencers. now you have political influence, areas that are on all platforms. what role do you see the social media platforms playing? and do you think the platforms themselves have any responsibility in regards to finding what is considered to be this information that is being pushed from their specific form? i think social media has a, a wide reach. i think it, it has the power for great, good. and with that kind of power, it can easily be swayed for harm. and so i do think that there should be continue to be moderators on these path on these platforms. i think it's absolutely
4:49 pm
important and i think when missed information and this information and purposeful lies and harm is being disseminated to people. i think they're after be moderators on these platforms. and yet we saw a line on john curry came out and said, is actually that to talk is too dangerous. and you have seen bands being pushed amongst the federal government among state governments to ban took talks the the app to talk from people's phones that our government paid for. yeah, absolute just recently show by themselves and is campaign jointed talk seriously planning to break the seasons of the seats and make the superbowl or the chief just being a good football game. then trouble trump or by you can buy the president and sending a message to americans about the nash about the safety of tick tock. by doing, i'd have to refer you to the campaign on that. nothing's changed about the national
4:50 pm
security concerns from the indices perspective, about the use of tick tock on government devices. that policy is still in place. how may i understand this? every leave tick, tock alone and twitter an x, and it's a, that's a billboard that's i st. banning radio or banning the phone. let me just make one comment that our colleagues said. in no way, am i ever going to advocate or allow if i have anything to say with a moderator to determine what is true and one is not true? what is missing information, this information, data information or what is hate speech? what is uh a vile, what could no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, everything you say i promise you, you cannot say anything that i cannot refute rebuke. and were there any way of a challenge in terms of the verity, if you we saw this during cove it, we saw people who said,
4:51 pm
i have an opinion regarding i respected and you would have thought these were the people advocating heresy for god's sake. no, no, no, no, no, no, no. listen, i want to live in a country where i have this thing called the 1st amendment. and the 1st amendment is this wonderful idea that says, if you don't like what i say, challenge me, tell me i'm wrong, go up against me or, or turn off that which i'm say, i love when people used to say we should have readings on albums. remember that should be rated g, was tipper gore against frank zappa and davi. osman said, thanks a lot. now nobody's going to buy my record because it says g. so now i'm going to have to deliberately put something in there that i didn't want to in order to sell it. so you can have, but you do go to this is america. say, what ever you want. i have never been harm, but anything anybody's ever said might have had my feelings hurt, but i've never been harmed. if i don't like it turn it. 7 off simple, i'm a bill, they have the people who have been hired like things that have been said and it is mostly more, you know, i want it full of come name or name one name,
4:52 pm
or what do you mean? name one person who have been hired by 3 people have found it. you tell me, yeah, i mean, let's talk about january 6th when somebody came out and sprained about revolution. and now we have a whole case of why this 3 speech free speech has limits. free speech does not allow you to go into a fitter and you'll fire nobody y'all respite your to theater. i was brand new, i was very way 6, this is great. is ridiculous that the enjoy reading the let's go to bryce and grace and bryce. and was there bryson? you're here respond 1st. i was there. i got investigated by and beyond. my phone got tap. the 1st thing the f b. i told me when i came to my home, they said that they know i wasn't in the building,
4:53 pm
but they still came and investigated me. tap my follow the present. you to me any way. we didn't harm anybody at january 6. all that got the bunk speaking aloud said mister formations, it'd be a moderate did this is a fact by the way all the people something habits of after always small person was injured. one person was injured, but we didn't kill anybody while he was there. but we got killed multiple mobile people of us guy was there also and also also on the oh, fingers broken. come on now, but if it is the riot, why it's somewhat let me tell you something. so anyway, if i stood up and apply that application, dr. t malcolm x, nobody would have said anything because somebody could take what they're saying the wrong way. but you're still advocating sedition. because if you read this edition as conspiracy stature, i guarantee you you can't sneeze without violating. don't don't ever area. and to and what happened is that the prize pass and why, why only have what you're say, what you're saying is this information, this is in your perpetuating an absolute life. don't want to know you got to ask,
4:54 pm
are you kidding people? i actually, oh wow, that actually bad, but it was kill. what's your time that we were and the, and you have to pay the back though, does he, how did, how did you take the words that were said, though, and say in the words were, say, and say that the result was because of the word said by donald trump or anybody else that was there in the march. are you directly say that that was what motivated anything that happened on the steps that day was just the words. okay, so let's say that he did not intentionally inside a riot with when his words showed the plays out in violence. why did he not stop it? why did you wait? oh, no, now or now your sport, wait a bit, 5, now you're charging that. you learn what stop it you. so here's where i see what you're doing. alright, did you see what was the worst year though?
4:55 pm
if you just went from, you just went from inciting, arise to not stopping it. that's called miss praise and, and there is no law in this country that you can be found guilty of. and i'm a lawyer that says you didn't do some of the test stop something unless you're a police officer or you're trained to do this. this january 6 stuff is a fraud. and let me tell you something. how we the i've never seen in my life. it was stupid, there was no interaction, there was no solution. i would, donald trump did was he has a big mouth and you'd be like everybody up was a big mouth and we'd all be locked up. and the fact that you can sit here and say that she should be what the, what he said she never ever said, right? he never ever said violate she never, ever said that you're made the you're right, you ready? now i was in the, i are your when your price in the last word on this case and embraces the supreme court has recently come out and said that it was not and is direction that it was
4:56 pm
not. title is direction. they're using that dealing with the what is going on with colorado, in the removal of truck, from the about last word, pop, culture, influence and politics. dessie obviously feels like it influenced it negatively the results in the actions. how do you feel and what's your final thoughts? so i am a victim of being a band. some platforms, like spite of 5, i've had music ban. i'm one of the few art of that ever got there music completely battles by the office of the gall hayes beach. she's advocating for model racing. so i don't even have a real chance. we've been pay out a positive message because it probably what hers the l g b t community according to her logic. but you're talking about murder though, and everything is good about everything else and everything is good. you can stop bad about christmas and everything is good. you can commit blast would be, everything is okay, but when i disagree it, is it okay? so no, and they're gonna allow one thing based on the allow it all i've asked, including me talking about a biblical message and that's how we change the culture. and that's how we bring
4:57 pm
positivity until dessie bryson line. oh thank you so much this lot. a lot of the conversations, the conversation that we need to be having in this country, especially if we can comes to some sort of respectable and at the, at the end of the conversation. thank you. ok, let me just be frank with you. i do find a little ironic to watch donald trump have any complaints about a figure of pop culture, like taylor swift remarking or being involved in politics. because the truth is, donald trump did not rise to be president from the ranks of the for a political world. donald trump, because of his popular tv show, the apprentice movie roles music tributes with one of the most well known celebrities in a multiple pop culture. rina's all this prior to announcing his run for office in 2015. it was his name recognition, which drew so many were never even paid much attention to politics, to even get involved. prior to this, the only president much involved in pop culture was ronald reagan. but he was more
4:58 pm
known for his popularity as governor of california. there's few minor film rules there for the groups who might be complaining the most about the info. as pop culture has over politics might be the same one who's election is a result of the strength of pop culture. i'm say now here's this, been your 360 view of the news affecting you. thanks for watching the the crime is for almost 3 centuries, it's been a stronghold of russian culture. 10 years ago of the events,
4:59 pm
the divided dependence is history into before and of the it became part of russia for good. the progressive divorce sort of so we'd love to see the fitness, the superficial. if the boy at the chest here, it was more or less to about that bill jeffers to do some with you the, with the station. with that, if you choose the most orders the think within those the mr. village is the listing of what the quote was pretty crossed and the good person it says gets that position this. it lit up the floor that us getting strongly just the in the spirit i didn't, i suppose by us then probably the course of things, but we will suppose to we need to ship to to be
5:00 pm
a gun because danielle could be moving, you receive the russian intelligence reveals that francis preparing this end to a 1000 troops to ukraine. busy jose is the french contingent, will be considered legitimate targets. libya marks 13 years since nature was military intervention, which plans most of all the most prosperous african countries of the time into a ticket of turmoil. we discussed the western land incursions legacy with a former goods off a government school. the city i became haven. busy international from the month that was a total, it isn't which later on spread through this i haven't reason of i freak out. all of them. we're funded on, on, directly by nato.
13 Views
Uploaded by TV Archive on