is this level as is it a valuable poster? is it the defense you of us in that in the word? or is it something deeper, more complex might be present good. let's stop without pleases. let's go part of the power button just to remind you once again that we're going to soon be one of the most watched news and information and shows on the planet why? because we are committed to context and we are committed to truth in this edition. we're going to take you through the weeks big event. so some surprising ones, like americans most established jewish politician attacking the israeli government and actually say would be that then. yeah. who you got to go to all just like that . so i'm not surprising news. like when russia is president,

put me was re elected by a whopping 87 percent of the vote and the media here and all throughout the west side. yeah. course cheated. color just 2 of the big stories that we're going to be following for you. i'm rick sanchez. this is direct impact the the okay, we're gonna start things off with schumer. frankly. i was surprised by this. i didn't see it coming method you know and put in as well. but i wanted to again, by introducing you to our panel, political scientists, dr. wilbert leon, political analysts, garlan nixon. both are hosts of the critical, our on spot, big news, if you like, the way i did that with my voice on that. right. i like i crescendo, does i introduce you guys? thank you very much. let's get started with schumer, chuck schumer, the highest ranking, do it american elected official, you know, of the united states of america. and this week he has been going after being isn't

yeah. who somewhat you could say almost what a vengeance, the fact that he's doing it is a vengeance. in fact, when the yahoo asked if he could come this week to speak to congress, the pro schumer wrong and to touch and, and to get close to his friends. schumer said, no, you can, i don't want you in congress. you can't come here. you'd have thought, you're sure, as a lifelong supporter, it is really, is become clear to me. the nets in yahoo coalition no longer fits the needs of these real after october 7th. nixon, what do you make of that? well, this is a change in rhetoric, but it's not a change in policy. i think people are, you know, that are concerned about what's going on in gods are seeking some things that will show them that a policy has changed some concrete. we're not going to send if we're going to do that some announcement by the, by an administrator. and this is just another rhetorical move to pacify the people

that are angry. and i'll add this. i think that i don't that they are prohibiting yahoo from coming here. because they know they'll be massive of people in the streets, they'll be angry, people making a lot of noise and they'll suffer as a result. do you think that the schumer was put up to this by the white house and maybe even specifically by the president united states because he did what the president can't do because the president is not jewish? did you follow that? i did, and i don't think that it was the white house that put him up to it. i think there are other is really interests that that put him up to it. and notice he did not call for a cease fire. he did not call for an end to the genocide in gaza. me and i think chuck schumer has been served. notice that netanyahu is dead man. walking me as it relates to pull is really pilot. so the intel says only 14 percent, and this is true. what i'm about to say apparently only 14 percent according to polls in israel, say they want him to remain as the prime minister after the guise of situation.

he's going to be indicted and he's already been indicted, but he may very well be convicted and sold a bite and then in and, and schubert, they're not going to put their money to it. so it's not what you're saying. what you're saying is it does it, don't you're saying, rick sanchez, don't look at this as a sign that the us agenda or the us policy and as well as changing the throwing this guy under the bus. but it's not like throwing the policy under the bus. oh, absolutely, the girl is. that's the right. the policy hasn't changed. it's just the players of the is, is on the chessboard are being, are being because look at it and um, humor made the point about netanyahu's colorless coalition. yeah. and what did he have to do to make that coalition move farther to the right? yeah. and he still said, by the way, if you listen to schumer, speech, which i carefully did, because i happen to be on a plane to actually read it. and he says in there that it's a joint state and it has the right to defend itself. and he says,

all the other talking points in defense of what i think you were saying. luckily, i think another thing that's important is that a letter has recently surface from a number of donors that, that was complaining basically their complaint is that because of the push back we're getting from the democratic constituency. it looked like this good move. donald trump in a position to win, simply as a result of mainly and principally as a result of the policy. so again, so you're saying a pack has a lot of money and that you from time to time influence american elections? is that what you're such a little bit, but i think what we've got there are other donors regarding insurance, and i think these donors are concerned that they won't get the return on their, on their investments. no, no, not a lot of money to be made. let me now remove my tongue from the side of my mouth as i continue with the next story. the western media was beside itself after the president's presidential elections and russia put an election as they called it. even though all. busy of even western balls show that potent is a very popular person, but media treated his when as if it was

a personal insult to them that he one. here's a sampling and the outcome was never in doubt. this may have been an election, but it certainly wasn't a contest. it was stage managed to crime and controls absolutely everything including the elections. so what's the point of them? yeah, so what is the point of them? i guess i would point out and you guys might or may not agree with me, that if you go with what they're accusing button being and that is somebody who essentially cheated the elect orally, i would add to you. i would remind you that president biden was about 5th when he was elected president. he had bernie in front of me, had elizabeth warren and we had buddha, judging from them, and somehow the party manipulated it. so he would go to the top. so that's manipulation. and if you want to talk about authoritarianism though, there's not one single person in the republican party who was afraid to take it on donald trump because we're afraid it's going to hurt them. who knows? personally, professionally, maybe even physically you say watch?

well, i say 1st of all, to those so called commentators are pundents from the west that are talking about the election was rig. where's the evidence of such, please present some evidence? well, they would argue they would argue fairly, that a lot of the people who take them on somehow or either disappear and i don't mean because they're killed or anything like that. of course. and involved is a different case. but i think that they would argue that usually his opposition lose his strength somewhere along the way. and they say that's well in here and i'll have it. well, argument let's so let's look at this. he won is the largest turn out in, in improvements history. uh huh. so voter turnout is an indication of something. yeah. he won with 86 percent of the vote. mm hm. and he had an appraisal rating of about what's 747580 saying to 82. well. okay. so when you're, when you're turn out as high, when your approval rating is 86 percent and you went by 86 percent,

the data seems to tell me we call it in statistics. still statistically relevant correlates yes it is. yes it is. and i think that's a fair point, and i think it's hard. it's funny, i've made this point. when i covered this story earlier this week, i said i looked it up and most of the western posters that russian not kremlin posters, preston balls. there's most of them german went in there stats, that this stuff went in there and they're the ones you determine that basically he's he went up 9 points in the last year. well, in fact, the lovato center, which is a, an organization that is funded, we learn from weekly cables at nevada center is funded by the national a, the usa id. right. and that's about it for a democracy. all right, so it's, it's, it's funded by us intelligence operations. if it for fair and you can go check the data right now. as of february, they had it with an 86 percent approval rating. so apparently, whatever shenanigans he used only got them another 1.2 percent and we probably should move on because we have a lot of stuff to talk about. but i will say this,

i am mystified by why members of the us media use that i could you could not like put and it's okay if you don't have to like people you don't like that. you don't like the lot have to like the, the president of it as well, or the president of bob. we're the president. anything. but why it is that they follow the talking points that are given to him by the state department and you make a good point. give me some facts. what can you say? like you say he cheated? how did you choose? what we don't say how he'd see that we just say he treated because the state department says, so you don't wanna put yourself in the mirror at the end of the day and say, why am i just what am i a puppet to? yes. okay, we'll leave it at that. i want to show you because i think you're right. i mean, i think there's no one of us. we're just saying things without being able to bring up. that is what i want to show you. one of the stuff. busy or is that the thanks to julia, massage, and wiki legs? we know a lot about this is an attack in 2007. i want you guys to watch this now. where you as soldiers, they take out to reuters photographers,

and you may remember it. and then they laugh about it and when the ambulance is come to take these people out, these are reporters, really photographers for reuters. they should have the ambulance acting all the while as if they're playing a video game. and they're joking about it and laughing about it, it's tough to listen to i'm, i'm showing you this because there's weren't this week that they are talks to possibly free julian a song here it is 180545 . all right, perfect. good. if i had to go on to shoot during the claire claire.

oh, yeah, like that right there. the way we just drove over a body, a ha, ha ha ha, ha funny. if not for julian massage, we don't know that those things happen. we should know that those things happen, not because i want to praise assad's not because i hate the united states, but because we need to be transparent, we need to be truthful and we need to learn from our mistakes. how am i wrong? well, you're absolutely right, and it's the release of this video. that is one of the key elements, which is why julian assigns wound up being held up in the ecuadorian embassy in london. and why he's been in bel march prison up to this time. because those are what are known as war crimes. and that's direct evidence of the united states being involved in war. crime is that it, it shouldn't be, it is a lot to embarrass your country. i understand if he's giving out nuclear secrets or something like that. but he didn't do any of that pain basically. and the reason i

do believe right now, i don't know what you guys think the reason i believe right now that the white house, the justice department may actually be considering doing a deal where they lower his charges to a misdemeanor. is because there's a lot of pressure on the united states right now because the ukraine, they don't need this guy coming over here in hancock. some people like rick sanchez showing this video every day. yeah, well yeah, absolutely. i agree. of course there's the, there's the electoral issue, they've have enough problems the, the late, the lease they need to do is to put pressure on their people in the media because their people in the media will be called out as to whether or not they're supporting another publisher, i think another important issue here is that within the call, within this case, there are some actions that the government that have that have taken such as spying on the spying on the defense team, which let's face it if that gets to the supreme court, they're going to have a difficult time, not throwing this out. do they really want to take a case with this holes?

is because this case has to the court or you. so why do i hear you saying you're saying that a sondors lawyers are on to something and they might have a breakthrough in this thing, but i think i think there are several to deal with there. yeah. now i think there are several issues in this case. that would make it difficult for the cost for the, for the, for the government, the project that wouldn't be no installation real quick before we go to break. you agree? oh, i agree, a 100 percent. and the they, the united states government does not want. julian decides to set foot on american soil. they were holding and praying that he died in belmore lies because of to, to a garland articulated the, the optics, the well, the optics of it. and it's gonna force western media to deal with the real. 7 all of these that donald trump looked into having him assassinated when, when my con pale was the head of the c, i a was a spied on his, on his council. they, we're thinking a lot of stuff is going to come out and a lot is not exactly in defense of the 1st amendment. speaking of the 1st amendment,

when we come back, i'm going to tell you what some of the supreme court members are saying about freedom of speech. maybe it's not that big a deal. maybe we ought to move it aside because after all the government's interest come 1st or do that, you're gonna hear it for yourself. do not go away. the

. the, the rabbit collapse of the ottoman empire gave the arabs hope for independence. but the colonial power. so their future differently, great britain and france agreed on the seizure of the air of lands under the guise of the so called mandate of the league of nations. this bible play caused a particular indignation in a rack, which was to get under the control of the british. in may 1921 rest with claim for independence broke out, both assuming and that she took part in it. soon the rallies turned into a real uprising against the invaders. more than 130000 people took up arms. britain urgently began to transfer reinforcements to

a rack and used aircraft. british war secretary, winston churchill birds, the use of chemical weapons against the rebels. and general ser i on their hel dane bordered the destruction of any village where weapons were found. burning a village properly takes a long time, an hour or more according to size all day and recall and cynically. in his memoirs, the mediaeval girl, the paid off, the revolt was crush. however, separate his empire had to make serious concessions. in 1921, it recognized bustle. the 1st, as the king of a rag time gave part of the power to representatives of the local population. v. a racket revolt marked the beginning of the national consolidation of the country and became an important milestone on the way to final independence. the

the hey, welcome back. i'm rick sanchez along with carla nixon and wilber leon. and i wanna fax these gentleman for joining us to so we can have his illustrious conversation. illustrious, on your part, i'll do the best buy to all right. we were talking just a moment to go about the 1st amendment of the united states of america, and something else happened this week happened to the 1st amendment this week. the supreme court, whose job it is by the way to interpret and in essence, defend the constitution of the united states, actually made some comments that seem to suggest that maybe it doesn't think all that much of the 1st amendment of the constitution. yours just as good times you browned jackson, seeming to suggest that maybe we ought to push freedom of speech. you know, maybe it ain't that important in some cases. so my biggest concern is that your view has the 1st amendment, ham,

stringing the government in significant ways in the most important time periods. i mean what we, what would you have the government do? i've heard you say a couple of times that the government can post its own speech, but in my hypothetical, um, you know, kids, this is not safe, don't do it is not going to get it done. i think i'm a journalist. i was trained as a journalist, it's all i know it's all i've ever done in my job drop. when i listen to this, i want to hear which one of you guys wanna wanna wanted. wanted to take the 1st crack of this thing. what do you think? well, she's doing the job. she's been sent there to do. huh. the empire is in serious trouble. and well, let me, let me take a step back. the 1st amendment when she's talked about it, hamstrings, the government. yeah. she's saying, well, the government should have a right to supercede the 1st amendment in a case like, for example, would, vaccines that people shouldn't have the right to go on on, on, on social media and criticize vaccines for example. because that hurts the

government's message. i don't know if she's ever read the 1st amendment because it starts by saying the government shall make note that is hands during the i've read the constitution. thank you. i already much, especially when i was the no law the it's called a negative. right? yeah. because it starts with the government shall make no law. huh. and fritz, it is probably the case of right is protecting us against the government. right? that's why it was written that was the same johnny, this but act son, which he seems to be saying is just as jackson, that a know i have to be some cases where the government has to come in and make a law against the 1st amendment. hans, i think that he says you cannot falsely cry. fire in a crowded theater. yeah, that issue was debated in my 10 and you can publish the, the, the, the manuscript on how to make an atomic bomb. there are things but not just because

the government has an opinion that's different from the other people were taking up way too much of your time. go garland. well, i think what we find out from her speech is who she represents. right? that's. that would be because the clearly she's supposed to represent the people here, the court is supposed to mean on behalf of the people not on behalf of the government . she makes it clear that she's saying we've got to make sure that the government isn't hometown strong. as the intent of the 1st minute. in other words, pop lock government. yes, there will be times when people will say things that are awful and stupid and maybe even wrong. but in our system, the way we created this country that high as the stand. sorry. yeah, but the to be through right, but you have a right to be wrong, right. but as what was it? she represents the ruling a lead. she represents the government. and so she's speaking for the people who put her in power in the part of the empire is on the wayne. and yeah, hands, that's what the whole trip talk things about. look the by the way,

this thing we're talking about here. but i didn't mean to interrupt you, but it is the legacy media, social media, same thing, right? you don't see any difference between the 2. she doesn't have a point that we got to keep an eye on social media or the but, but it's social media. this really bringing us to this point, which is the hands wikileaks, the, the, the atrocities being committed by the government in the fallacy they are being exposed. and now the supreme court is turning to defend the empire as a, as opposed to defending the people i liked the way you put those 2 together. if i take a vacation where you sit here and do this for me to the manufacture, another one that one of the things i like to do on this show especially given i have. busy of experience in this area is to put the us media in place, reminding them from time to time. just heather failing us really. but if you think i get a lot less with this topic, wait to hear, there's do name jose vega, this guy is running for congress in new york. his name is jose vega. and when he

found out that the distinguished executive directors and editors of the new york times and the la times and, and the washington post were going to be given a, a conference there about journalism and how they cover story. this guy shows up and he just throws, he lets them have it here. watch. is there anything you've gotten right in the last 20 years or am i mistaken about that? i mean, it's just kind of funny because i read wrong serious, wrong rush to get really wrong. okay. kind of getting the list goes on and on. so the last thing you could do to try and actually fix your reputation is acknowledge that through we, we had to wind out that lensky was going to bomb moscow on the anniversary. i mean, if you saw him parcel suited to at least say, right, that's a wednesday, we're going to bring us on the verge of world war 3. the main screen price is now the dying. nobody is ever going to listen to you again. you have no credibility,

but the hardware, the only people tell what you have to release. well, i'm not big productive design anymore, and it's dying. so where are you at least some thing either about nordstrom or ukraine or the fact that the lens he brought us to the verge of world war 3. and the only reason we knew about that was the leaks. i gotta tell ya. i've never seen anything quite like it out, and by the way, when he asked them to respond, they didn't, they ignore them, garland pick it up. well, you know, one of the things that he says is that it's dying on the that, that the mainstream media is dying on the vine. and we've seen lately, massive layoffs all over the mainstream media. the bottom line is this, people are transferring their attention to alternative media to show because this to youtube shows, etc, because they don't get the truth from that make people want, even if they don't, and it was bad for correct. right? absolutely. always things you mentioned were true. i noticed an alternative media people will listen to shows where they don't even ideologically agree with or align

with the host. but at least they feel that the person's trying to be honest with them. yeah. they're had trying to have that conversation. you agree? i agree, a 100 percent and main stream made a huge mistake when they turn their news rooms into profit centers. yeah. and when they turn their news programs away from true journalism to live style in entertainment, and they're not providing substance. and the minimal substance that they provide has no context. so, you know, we still some people who are still think that china said a spied balloon over to this country when it was in fact a wayward weather balloon district. you know, china, something happened this week as well, but i thought it was interesting. one we found out that us has troops now on an island that's just 3 miles from the coast of china. apparently there to protect and train the taiwan military. also in cuba, the us at teams. and there is one media account of the president of cuba,

where he's saying you guys have been interfering with our country now for the past 60 years. here is the president of cuba diaz canal. you see on the, on the the he says look, the bottom line is, the only reason why you got this situation in cuba is because you've had to is that a bar go on has never 60 years. i never thought i would put china and cuba in the same sentence with taiwan in the middle, but that seems to be the story this week. us interference us interference, us interference, right, and add nichol dogwood. you can add them as well. you can add per room, you can add bread zoo uh the, the, they, and haiti you, you gotta put haiti of this. uh, because again, the, the, the folks that have been victimized by american imperialism have now been throwing out the neo liberal american public governments that were in place. and they've

been installing their own socialist leaning governments. and the united states, under no circumstances is going to tolerate that shift in the global dynamic. well, i don't, i don't know, china is going to tolerate us soldiers as we learned this week in off the 3 miles off of their cost. that's what i mean. i have to ask, are we trying to start working through? yeah, well, you know, i think that we have an on hinge, the group of the neo cons, invite administration, and they're setting fires all over the world. and right now, any time there's a provocative act that they can take against china, they're doing it. i personally think that the bottom administration sees the profit patients towards china as a way to try to attract, you know, what they're always doing. they're trying to attract conservative votes, which they will attract and they're taking just unreasonable chances. but i will say this, i do believe that the leaders and the global majority, the leader of china, the leaders of russia, are wise enough to usher in

a new multiple world. yeah. and keep the hot heads at bay in washington delta dental. they're smart enough to do the global south is certainly a gate in strength and momentum, and i think that's going to create a little bit of a power balance. and they might, that may not be such a bad thing by the way. the service is, is basically doing it to itself because the actions it's taking are forcing these countries to a stand about relationships. yeah. they otherwise might not have a stab. that's actually a very good point, dr. warmer leon growling next. and my thanks to both of you for being with us. and that's the end of this once again before we go, i want to remind you of our mission is simple as you can probably tell. we try not to live in boxes around here, not just in a place where people all agree with me. truths don't live in boxes, need it the way the truth is everywhere. i'm retro interest. i'll be looking for you again right here, where i hope to provide a direct impact the

take a fresh look around his life. kaleidoscopic isn't just a shifted reality distortion by power to division with no real opinions. fixtures designed to simplify will confuse really one say better wills, and is it just as a chosen few fractured images presented as 1st? can you see through their illusion going underground? can the position i was suggesting bell great. was suggesting that we send americans

in and uh, the bridges on the drain and put on your bill is us. one of the most move dining room probably now, now a lot soon, but as to when you see it, all the owners will tell you that it will save you most of glasses in the middle of it is what i need to file a passcode as well. as always, does, this one is known as the guidelines source or cit, emotional ronnie room? and may be, you know, a lot less radioactive than the something is active uranium, but still its radioactive. it has toxic $750.00, killed the laptop. you want me to go and see so easily. again, let's see the echo seats. the boeing that i don't know the mold was suggesting. we pharma fell grace bill. call us. what day was

the man 2 of the full suspects and fridays. considerable, mastercard. it must go paid fuel see to tower charges. one of the men will be held in custody while the investigation continued. the more footage of the tragedy and most go and much is but a mid, som, over the dog could still bowers tales of troops. arrow is a match from the college of those pushing that own lives on the line to save others the

california. when the shots started i.