gaza the historical records notes. the american administration is a named co conspirator to jennifer. the. the west is especially actively persuading us not only publicly, but also in context started diplomatic missions that we should not suspect the crate. pushes top different modeling buses, washington's repeated dismissal of ukraine's possible involvements and the tire. since i can most go suspicious and obsessive the public choices of last week's terrace and talked in moscow west and significant amounts of money on the trip to currency from ukraine, which was used in preparing to commit the a trust a lot, at least according to russia's investigate the committee is the one in gaza approaches the 6 month market. we hear from an indonesian volunteer who chose to keep helping contest against me and bustled enclave despises hospitably involved.

israel not only wants to kill the people of gossip with their bullets, but also with starvation because the page entering gaza is still minimal and cannot be distributed fairly the system 5 am in moscow. this is audience, a national and pete to scope with the latest world news. thanks for joining us. that's what the top story this our, the russian farm and assist. the good luck for office said that washington is a constant insistent that ukraine wasn't involved in the recent cetera. it's like in moscow, is coming off as obsessive a sample of giving you some one that is on the west is actively trying to convince everyone that this is the work of baseline mistakes and that's no one else should be a suspect. above all ukraine go up the speak directly and regularly about this country, and it's not involved in the future. it is become an obsessive. we have repeatedly said that we're not making any final conclusions until the investigation is fully completed. we simply have no ride through a lot obviously,

especially since those people who carried out this terrorist attack tried to flee to crane before the words to change the west. it's especially active in persuading us not only publicly, but also in context or as diplomatic commissions that we should not suspect to crate to. the americans have stressed in every possible way that they weren't us on march 7th of this year. following them on march page, the british embassy issue at this thing weren't on the on. so they addressed this warnings to their citizens horton. moscow advising them not to attend, must events as for contacts with things intelligence services, they're generally not published. but in a recent interview with the director of the federal security service impressions for more than a couple of years set that there has been such contacts. and there has been a warrant in, but it was only a very general nature versus investigative committee says the significance amounts of money and crypto currency from your credit and nationalist, was paid to the is the mist perpetrators ahead of last fridays. it starts talking must go in the initial results of the investigation fully confirmed,

the plan nature of the terrorist actions, careful preparation and financial support from the organizers of the crime. the investigation has confirmed data on the income of significant amounts of money and crypto currencies from ukraine to the perpetrators of the terrorist attack, which were used in the preparation of the crime. as you were hearing just a moment ago, this is the information that we've just had from the russian investigative committee. it's pretty big. they're saying that they have substantial evidence that ukraine was involved in the attacks last week. a croaker city hold. they have link to be attack us who killed a $143.00 individuals and left hundreds more interested in the attack at 2 ukrainian nationals. they say they say that they significant evidence the money including quit to current c. we use the funding to the attack before it happens. and base, of course, is coming off the box. we put claims previously from the head of the russian f s b

that ukraine has links to these attack is this, have a listen to what he has said previously, students to 0, and that was the way, what did you cry and supposedly need to do to prove its worth commit sabotage and terrorist attacks. that's what the ukraine security services and the british security services have claimed. oddly enough, the americans have also spoken about this repeatedly on those. why didn't you specify the yes, the u. k. and ukraine. those 3 countries were behind the terrorist attack. of course you well, i think so. we are currently talking about the findings that we have and there are some general developments. this is a jigsaw puzzle and adds to that puzzle. we already know that those attack is apprehended as they were fleeing most go through app brenda, down in the brown screeching which is close to you quite. and that is evidence coming out from the speech that they were looking to head into crane, but they have contacts that and they were hoping for window to be open so that they

could cross the border. but as i say, this is dick. so the latest piece of puzzle we've had today is from the russian investigative committee saying that there was substantial evidence that crypto currency was funded from ukraine to the attack is on the face. and use that for me to thoughts terror attack in moscow trying to can i just touch and on washington in all this, it keeps insisting key of authorities had no involvement, no awareness of this attack, what's being said. and how does this information relate to that? not yeah, that's why it wasn't very long off though we was seeing what was happening occurred to city hold that we had a statement from whitehouse saying ukraine was not involved in this attack that really quick off the mocking denying that also say that not involved and we've heard that line over and over, not just from washington, but from other western governments over the last 7 days. we've also had that, reiterated fine matthew. mila, who's the support special for the us state department?

once again saying ukraine is not involved. it's clear that these claims are categorically false. ukraine wasn't behind these attacks. the u. k. was behind these attacks, the united states was advised that in fact, the united states warned russia about the possibility of these attacks. well, let's just pick up on those warnings for a 2nd. this warnings came at the beginning of march. it was basically the embassy website, the us telling the citizens to leave the u. k. website said something very similar, and they have site, the americans that they passed all this information to the cbs and fest basic. well actually what you gave us was very known concrete evidence to say it was quite general knowledge, essentially wishy washy. nothing really that they could act on as a result of that. now we've also had a response from the russian foreign minister, maria. so how about to walk marketing bill until the u. s. has continued to say in terms of that idea, but they saying ukraine was known for of the missed as opposed to part then the

white house, along with the state department, has stated that ukraine has nothing to do with the tara attack on what data and what information did they draw such a conclusion? it's completely unclear. any one thing is obvious, that washington started to whitewash the key of regime to whitewash themselves. because everyone understands that there is no standalone key every shame without weston minute, 3 support and western funding. let's not forget, this is an incredibly complex investigation, an investigation that russian authorities are conducting, who are on the ground, that the ones with the evidence that the ones piecing this possible together. and i think it's easy to forget sometimes of west and governments can make all the assertions that they won't see what they know, hey, no, 15 through the material and working out exactly what's going on. and that's exactly what we know. russian authorities wants to use because they won't know that they

holding the warrant, people accountable for this horrific attack dead police attack, and he is a police in russia. meanwhile, i spoke to the person for the building, puts you into. keir has claimed that last week, so it's like, you must go, couldn't have happened without the involvement of foreign powers that hadn't been there, nothing. this doesn't happen without support from any states intelligence activities or from several states, whatever that is. this is not an organization that i see sold, a light can do a loan, but ultimately, i'm not saying we agree with the address. russia has shown, but it's true that there must be a sponsor, uninitiated, for subtractions, spokes person. i'm not sure they issued a statement issued a number of interesting facts and a television interview. he says that uncle is it's, it has inspected the footage and suggests that the perpetrators of this attack were professionally trained. and that this could not have happened without some sort of pre planned motives. and the reason why uncle is currently involved in this case is because at least 2 of the gunmen were believed to have visited

a turkey mum days. or if not weeks before the attack, and this is a matter of concern for uncle as much as it is for moscow, which is why the spokesman has been quite vocal and adamant in his position towards the matter. what else is, of course he says that the tensions in the region are escalating any post, a rhetorical question, who benefits? and this is, of course, the question of great concern for on cry. because in this, according to the spokesman, he says that the number of things that need to be evaluated here, of course, who benefits, could it be a group? could it be a number of groups? is a state sponsored? is it not? but more importantly, what he said was, it could also be another group that is gaming to redirect and much of the focusing attention to serial related conflicts. and in this sense, of course, the spokesman was referring to isis. he did not specifically say that the united states was involved, but he didn't see any way that the united states would best benefit from an industry on a scenario like this. of course,

this is also in line with washington's position on the matter as well. washington says that she was not involved that it was isis, whereas most goes position. and according to the investigation committee, suggestively that ukrainian nationalists were in fact involved in the attacks carried out by these perpetrators that onto this position is more important here in the sense that they're also competing terrorist activities. and that has been the general consensus between the turkish and russian presidents and based on all of the facts and at least the allegations at this point coming out, it suggests that there could have been someone behind these attacks. and entre moscow will work closer together than ever before. this comes as a new york times on schofield speculations of the must go security services upon failings, accusing restaurant. i'm trying to pin the blame on ukraine for the atrocity. and you say, for also claims to us without specific details about the part to shield his thoughts . as in russia,

the adversarial relationship between washington and moscow prevented us officials from sharing any information about the plot beyond what was necessary out of fear, russian authorities might learn their intelligence sources or methods. pharmacy on the list, laurie johnson told off savings united states had and so they didn't follow the protocol is showing information with moscow. the motto i was taught early on a ca and they've got a motto it mit, nothing. deny everything. make counter accusations, in this case, the united states did not follow protocol a number. what if they had information about an attack that was going to take place in moscow, where there are american citizens running around? then you share everything you have with the russian counterpart. this is very dest, ingenuous in this, on us, on the part of the united states. because when you go back and look at the public

warning that was issued, it was issued only for 48 hours. they didn't say other something may happen within the next 48 hours. but if it doesn't, you know, we're not sure when it could happen. no, no, no, no. they said, hey, there's 48 hours. this is part of the new intelligence community propaganda effort to try to just push the mean the story line, the rush, it was warned that the russian security services incompetent the applauded, we're putting in as incompetent and callous that and it's a lie. this is all wester propaganda taking advantage of this. what we know for a fact is there is not one damn us person or nato person on the ground with the investigators looking at the evidence. and yet, despite the fact that you don't have a single one looking at the evidence, you're all saying, oh yeah, i was, i, it says it was it, ukraine. they can't know that. meanwhile, the head of versus intelligence agency says it's all probably

a warning governance. i collect substantial detail the why, so i'll skip back. you should say that the best and then your salesman, off interior samples in the maps. russian officials seem to be pretty good been or so. there are no such prey, bobs and russian because they carry maneuver in the mouth, smelt hair, what type of sees. but there is all saying who have the huts talks about it. by the way, it now becomes clear why the expression to wash one's mouth out with soap is common in the states. don't get accurate, who's host of the whistle? blowers show and the former us intelligence officer himself says that russia has an undeniable rights investigates any a legit you fighting involvement? we should go where the evidence points and the evidence is pointing to crate. now does the evidence say there was official involvement of view creating government? not yet, but it's worthy of investigation there. there's

a reason why these attackers were not suicide bombers, which has been the norm in the past. there's a reason why they were fleeing in the direction of ukraine, and i think that that the russian government has every right in the world to investigate these questions. and to get to the bottom of this, i wouldn't, i wouldn't close the door on anything. if the information was declassified to the point where the us government felt comfortable turning it over to the russian government, then why not release it to the public so that we can make our own decision? why not say this is what we gave the russian government. so we can see if the state department is lying that the information they turned over was indeed actionable. i would bet my next paycheck that it was not actionable when any 6 months into the war in gaza, there's still no sign that israel's prepared to scale down. it's assaults on the

policy and you an enclave. officials to upset them on the 32400 people have now being killed. but some, it's enough. civil answers are choosing to stay and help the victims. despite the cottage, we bring you now the story of an indonesian medical worker who still working in gaston the we are calling the civilians to leave the guys that goes out. some us wants to keep them there as a human shield. this is innocent. civilians are going to be hard to sign on. i see all the civilians and one in the in this on we were safe to our homes. i was at work and they told me the house is

bombed in the neighborhood. when it came back, i found my uncle and he told me your father was murdered. we cannot find your son. then they said, your grandmother was also murdered and we were in a shelter. my daughters were crying, so my husband went to look for bullshit for them. and these really show him in the back. every time we try to get close to him, they started shooting towards us to this day, i do not know what happened to him. the . even here in a school in hun, you news, we're not spared from his really attacks every night. we hear the bombing quite

a few people have been hit by jerome strikes, including some who were farming, or even just walking the all the time i was display several times. i can tell you the death is better than disgrace. i wish these rallies had killed me. that would have saved me from the excessive. okay. um yeah, we wilks many kilometers from gauze. the city. we remain that for 40 days without 8 flour or canned goods. if that was the most left for us as adults, we would feed it to the children. we will suffering that no food, no food to know medicine, nothing. it was like we would dead. the aid was coming, but the is radius. preventative from reaching out to the israel, not only wants to kill the people of gaza with their bullets,

but also with starvation because the age entering gaza is still minimal and cannot be distributed fairly in my view, if 1000 trucks could enter garza, then the crisis could be resolved the notice of course, this is very sad because the assistance they should receive actually adds to their misfortune. indeed, this age should be sent via the egyptian border in rafa. and the solution is a ceasefire. the

thing that these people have nothing, their houses have been destroyed, they have no work. so their survival really depends on humanitarian assistance. they don't have cooking equip and they don't have warm clothes. they don't even have a place to rest. the rest of the hospitals that are still operating are in southern gaza. tier the fighting is still ongoing. so the current condition of the hospitals is very worrying. they're running low on medicine. the number of doctors is decreasing, at least 364 medical staff have been killed as a result of this really attacks,

not to mention more than 260 others who have been detained by the idea of hospitals are also running out of fuel the since we moved from northern garza to the south in several days we prepared food for $5800.00 refugees near the european hospital. we're focused on providing baby milk diapers or cooking oil. whatever we can help with the situation in gaza has not improved. israel continues to launch attacks on various regions. the man we never felt regret. you're

actually very proud to be representatives of more than 280000000 indonesians, of whom only 2 people now remain here. that is me and my colleagues. moreover, we know that the entry room to gaza is still being blocked by israel. so not everyone can enter here because permits are very difficult to obtain. security is very tight. therefore we chose to stay here to help our brothers and sisters in gosh, the mustang in the region. the palestinian education ministry impulse is almost $6000.00 students have lost their lives since october. the 7th, at least 9000 more have been wounded in the ideas on slots. the ministry audits

over 200 teachers and school administrators have been killed in gaza. the majority of the enclave is remaining governments and on russ schools. now serve as refugee shelters, as, as a constant. these various types, the many severely damaged and some completely destroyed you had from so the other side of a local student says education has no future in the investment to me, i wasn't available like the 1st place i wasn't 12 actually and my friends told me that oh, university goes and so i swung by the side, actually i don't know anything about my daughters in the university because we all supplemented of some of those things. that's the only one that's involved. there's no holding because there's no hope in indication. there is no home in the an amazing does nothing kind of work and doesn't seem to cushion and goes, i got sort of distorted because in the 1st thing,

schools and universities now is a place that people tend to be safe. uh, doctors and teachers about 20 percent of them got me. oh, out of garza, i was seems to be able to, to, to take, to finish my university to go off of the country. continue my studying in a good way. but actually out of the way, because of the and now what i want to be, i want to be a free man. that's it. all i want this to go up to goes a life. but western representatives on the un security council have once again, lots of rushes requests to discuss nato's 1999 minutes intervention. and you can solve, you must go have sold have the debates on the 25 year anniversary of the minute. your life is bombing campaign, which is deputy on bus the, to the end has called the move a serious blow to the organizations reputation. a silly story. so that we

regret that the council has been tracked into an extremely unpleasant situation at the behest of the western troy. in fact, it has just refused to discuss the night on its agenda, on the maintenance of international peace and security. that is essentially the members of the security council have refused to fulfill their mandate. and this is an extremely serious bolts. the reputation of our body fronts, britain and united states have sacrificed it for their own self interest by any means necessary to prevent discussion on this platform of the issue of nato's illegitimate aggression against the sovereign state of yugoslavia. by hasn't to disappoint you, you can by procedural manipulation, block one or even 2 meetings of the un security council. that alone will not erase the consequences or the destructive actions. thousands of dead and main civilians. territories poisoned by depleted uranium and expose surprising a number of cancer diseases that will haunt according to experts. estimates at the next 60 generations of the bulk in population hotspot in the center of view of created by natives hand, which will not fade away and which will threaten to exploit again at any moment.

well, essentially we had western countries on the un security council blocking the discussion of what happened in the former yugoslavia. now the russian representative made clear that this was because western leaders did not want the world to be reminded of the outrages pre taxes upon which these interventions were carried out. uh, and they also did not want there to be any discussion that would show the negative implications of nato and its activities. now it's worth noting that china also spoke. i've been expressed of disappointment and said that these are the kinds of issues that the un security council should be discussing and that this was only a meeting that was to take place. this was not a binding resolution. this was not a statement on behalf of the security council. this was just a meeting to discuss a military intervention and its consequences. however, it was block to now the russian representative said that this points to an em

balance because the majority of the members of the security council, the 15 member body that leads the united nations, the majority of countries represented on it at this time, had no problem with this meeting, taking place by western countries with their veto bower were able to prevent any discussion. so that caused a lot of outrage. we heard both russia and china expressing disappointment in saying that these kinds of issues, military interventions and their results, the pre text under which they are waged. these are the very kinds of issues that the united nations security council should be discussing, the russian federation. and here we spoke to your opinions to these scholar, thought to stuff and guides from bell drives. he says that western countries still aren't ready to accept the pots in nature. as bombardments also be, because they know it was a walk on they panicked, they are so much afraid of dimension on the war crimes that they have committed. and the original cry which is crime like against these and the crime against the

international. uh, the whole point of what we see, what we are seeing today goes back to everything goes back to 1999 when without the resolution, without any kind of a legal basis. natal attacks have committed aggression and war crimes against the sovereign country, which is federal republic of yugoslavia at the time. so if this is the question, then the whole point of nate to basically physically occupying serbia in southern province if possible. and the thought here comes the question and also their, their policy as such because the original crime is crime against fees. and it was commissioned by natal by breaking international law, advise me 3 large men. so even today, every that of ukrainian war is in one way or the other victim of beta because

a lot of and policy and radio international law was it brought us to today's moment . and finally, a $45.00 people are dead in south africa after a bus drove off a bridge. and the northern province of limpopo, an 8 year old boy is reported to be the only survivor of the crush. and he's been transported to hospital according to the south african transport department, the drive, the loss control, as the bus was pulling a trailer, something it something of a chris, i mean, so a bulky river. what caused by a local authority say, the bus is transporting people from neighboring botswana on a pill and a pilgrimage to south africa. that's a rep, phenomenal speech of scots, and i'll be back again the top of dallas, the latest news views i'm in the states. right, say i'm on the

the french to do this, but it's a bit of a cover letter. gosh, a little bit to me and i know even though for the fall of the school guys is it's a few. i know where you liked it. the wish for you see when i goodness

it only for the simple do this device to be able to be like for us to be on the brain in and go into the stuff to the, [000:00:00;00] the hello and welcome to cross software. all things are considered. i'm peter level secretary defense lloyd austin declared, well hosting his is really counterparts the us israel, military relationship as unshakable as israel continues and slaughter of